Food Advocates Downgrade Splenda From ‘Safe’ To ‘Caution’


WASHINGTON (UPI) — U.S. food advocates downgraded sucralose, the artificial sweetener better known as Splenda, in the Chemical Cuisine guide to food additives.

Michael F. Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest in Washington said the food safety watchdog group had long rated sucralose as “safe” but is now placing it in the “caution” category pending a review of an unpublished study by an independent Italian laboratory that found the sweetener caused leukemia in mice.

The only previous long-term feeding studies in animals were conducted by the compound’s manufacturers, Jacobson said.

CSPI’s Chemical Cuisine gives the artificial sweeteners saccharin, aspartame and acesulfame potassium “avoid” ratings, the group’s lowest.  However, the CSPI considers rebiana, a natural high-potency sweetener obtained from stevia, to be “safe,” though deserving of better testing, Jacobson said.

“Sucralose may prove to be safer than saccharin, aspartame and acesulfame potassium, but the forthcoming Italian study warrants careful scrutiny before we can be confident that the sweetener is safe for use in food,” Jacobson said in a statement.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.