Feinstein Says Free Press Only Means People On MSM Payroll

0 Shares
do not use

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), backed by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), has proposed an amendment to a journalist shield law sponsored by Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier in the month. She wants to choose who can and who cannot be considered a journalist.

Schumer’s shield law bill’s purpose is aimed at protecting journalists’ sources. A renewed push for stronger media shield laws came after disclosures earlier this year that the Justice Department secretly subpoenaed two months’ of telephone records for phone lines used by reporters and editors for The Associated Press and secretly used a warrant to obtain the emails of a FOX News journalist.

“We need a strong media shield bill now more than ever,” Schumer said. “This is an important step forward that strengthens this bipartisan bill and should give it even more momentum to clear the committee and the Senate by the end of the year.”

The New York Democrat’s effort came complete with a four-page explanation of who would be protected under the law, summarily, a person “with the primary intent to investigate events and procure material in order to disseminate to the public news or information concerning local, national or international events or other matters of public interest.”

Though Schumer has declared that organizations like the government leak clearinghouse Wikileaks would not be protected by the language in his bill, the proposal would protect independent bloggers and citizen journalists.

But Feinstein wants to place further limitations on the definition of journalist because she is concerned “that the current version of the bill would grant a special privilege to people who aren’t really reporters at all, who have no professional qualifications.” The Senator has proposed that only people who are salaried or at least affiliated with a news “entity” should receive media shield protections.

Specifically, the Feinstein amendment requires a journalist to meet one of the following definitions:

  • Work as a “salaried employee, independent contractor, or agent of an entity that disseminates news or information;”
  • Either (a) meeting the prior definition “for any continuous three-month period within the two years prior to the relevant date” or (b) having “substantially contributed, as an author, editor, photographer, or producer, to a significant number of articles, stories, programs, or publications by an entity . . . within two years prior to the relevant date;” or
  • Work as a student journalist “participating in a journalistic publication at an institution of higher education.”

Her amendment also reaffirms problematic language in the original version of the bill, which gives Federal investigators broad room for abuse, requiring people seeking protection under the media shield to regularly participate in journalistic activities. Specifically, the amendment requires:

  • That individuals “engage[d] in . . . the regular gathering, preparation, collection, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting or publishing on” matters of public interest; or
  • That individuals “regularly conducted interviews, reviewed documents, captured images of events, or directly observed events.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation contends that Feinstein’s crusade to define “who” is a journalist with vague language about paychecks is bad news for independent bloggers, journalists and anyone on the media fringe.

The organization said in a statement:

Sen. Feinstein’s amendment is riddled with vague language, failing to define key terms including “agent,” entity,” “substantially contributed,” and “regularly”—on which the definition of who’s a journalist turns. Non-traditional journalists are at a disadvantage when the interpretative waters are muddy. Why? Because such vagueness invites interpretations that exclude those who are on the margins of status quo journalism, and who are often in a more vulnerable position and unable to hire legal counsel to sort through the law’s ambiguities. As a result, independent bloggers and citizen journalists would likely be interpreted out of Feinstein’s definition of journalist.

Of course, Feinstein is probably well aware that her amendment endangers citizen journalists and thousands of bloggers keeping a keen eye on the criminal class in Washington. That’s the point.

 

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • independent thinker

    Feinstein is likely acting for the current administration.

    • disqus_bQJ5hcTAd4

      Ya think.

  • Harold Olsen

    Feinstein Says Free Press Only Means People On MSM Payroll

    ——————————————————————————-
    Basically, what she is saying, anyone who does not oppose the left’s Nazi agenda.

    • Don 2

      Maybe the MSM should be the ones unprotected, since they rarely bother to investigate anyway. I wouldn’t trust any legislation being proposed by the three Communist: Schumer, Feinstein, and Durbin. There’s always an undisclosed secondary purpose.

  • villageidiot

    Who let her out of the coffin and why?

    • Frank Zappa

      Perfect

  • rwp24382

    Fear the government that fears us. This proves beyond a showdown of a doubt, they are scared. Shut off any dissent, confiscate weapons, spy on everyone, and find every piece of mail they get. These people are paranoid. They know that Obama is close to getting impeached and want to disarm the country as soon as possible.

  • Sarah Conner

    Under obomanation,all Amendments will become null and void…by executive bullsh!t order…to be silent is to comply…we can be silent no more…I WILL NOT BE SILENT,I WILL NOT COMPLY,I WILL NOT OBEY,I WILL NOT BOW DOWN…I AM AN AMERICAN AND WILL DIE ON MY FEET,NOT ON MY KNEES…

    • Frank Zappa

      Sarah Conner:
      Excellent Summary;
      Diane Frankenstein is a FRAUD, as well as Senator Dick Dirtbag now that’s a pair to draw 2. Diane is getting a bit OLD, don’t Ya think? Looks to me as IF she has been sucking on a lemon for some time, maybe she needs a complete full body makeover assuming that would help? maybe she had a sex change? After all she is from “San Francisco” City of fruits and nuts.

      • Sarah Conner

        As my brothers are fond of saying,”That old boar needs a good [bleeping]“…

        • Frank Zappa

          I have no issues that you would call her what she really is and that is a Whore, a political Cockroach, that has infested our country, and should be run out of the political arena.
          Ahhhhh The Bleeping….No wonder she is so cranky, she has missed the ride she desperately is in need of. Maybe she thinks she is in Disney Land, but does not know IF she is the right height to get on the “Ride.”

          • Bill

            Good analogy, Zap

      • Bill

        Durbin, “Dirtbag” is on the take from the drug companies. He is the main one pushing for new FDA laws to take away your right to heal yourself using supplements. Intravenous C drips are one of the most potent therapies you can use. Because they cannot be patented, they hurt the profits of the drug companies and therefore are bad.
        Feinstein is his cohort in crime in pushing those bills.

      • Vis Fac

        The last three face lifts failed to take root. I do have a suggestion or two for her.
        Libertas inaestimabilis res est
        Semper-Fi

    • FreedomFighter

      Fiendstein is a psychopath.
      Laus Deo
      Semper Fi

      • Vis Fac

        YOU GOT THAT RIGHT but you failed to include omnipotent like ODUMBO Seems as though all politicians fall into that category.
        Libertas inaestimabilis res est
        Semper-Fi

      • Christopher Koda

        No she is just another dip stick that was voted in by her fellow dip sticks in San Francisco.

  • Dale H Brown

    The Constitution protects a free press, wouldn’t these so called Senators have to come up with an amendment for the Constitution before any thing like that law could be legal or in effect?? It would seem that they are trying to circumvent the very laws that protect us all –just more Obama stooges doing his bidding–but I am not surprised , they couldn’t care less about the American people once they are voted in to office–each day gets more sickening, from the info that comes out of DC

    • chocopot

      The CPUSA – er, I mean the Democrats – have no use for the Constitution. They simply ignore it, knowing full well that Holder will do nothing to stop them, and the Repubs haven’t got the cojones to challenge them. To borrow a phrase: “We don’t need no stinking Constitution!”

      • Vis Fac

        I’ve got my guns (they want to take form me) I don’t need no STINKING BADGE either!
        Semper-FI

        • chocopot

          Me too. Pass the ammo, brother.

          • Vis Fac

            Got Plenty on hand!

            Libertas inaestimabilis res est
            Semper-Fi

  • Gib74

    The idiot political ‘class’ needs to be all run out of Washington…………………………………

  • John King

    If I start my own News Paper…and it starts to have readers, then I should qualify…even if no-one pays me or if I never went to college for a degree in journalism!!!

  • steve

    this is just part of the end of your freedom and liberty’s . the best is yet to come. do you still think man has the answers. when will you finally wake up. i hope it doesn’t happen when you have a gun pointed at your head.

    • Vis Fac

      If I have a gun pointed at my head know that I used mine first.
      Libertas inaestimabilis res est
      Semper-Fi

  • Warrior

    If I were in boehner’s shoes, I would say “all” bills passed down from this senate full of “progressives” is dead on arrival.

  • Protonius

    I wonder if, under Feinstein’s proposed redefinition of the term “journalist”, Alexis de Tocqueville — best known for his treatise “Democracy in America” (Volume I, 1835 and Volume II, 1840) — would have qualified.

    And what about OTHER outspoken independent thinkers and political philosophers and explorers of any particular political, social, or of other condition that might have come into their focus, regardless of whether or not that individual was or wasn’t — or is or isn’t affiliated — with a “news entity” (whatever THAT is) or receiving a “salary” for having his or her views on the matter disseminated?

    In today’s America, would that person — as Feinstein would perhaps have it — NOT be (even if in regard to a single disseminated output) entitled to be accorded the title “journalist” and NOT be entitled to be protected (even if in regard to a single disseminated output) by a journalist “shield law”?

    But why even argue those points; the key issue here is that, IMO, Feinstein is trying to CONSTRICTIVELY NARROW what has ALREADY been traditionally defined — and which is still evolving toward even greater openness — as to the who is and who is not “permitted” to be considered a “journalist”.

    First of all, SINCE WHEN do I, or anyone, need GOVERNMENT PERMISSION to be a journalist?

    Also, as traditionally accepted, and also per the term’s definition in prominent dictionaries and sources even today — at least as per my understanding — there is NO requirement that says that in order to qualify as a “journalist”, a person must:

    “Work as a ‘salaried employee, independent contractor, or agent of an entity that disseminates news or information';

    “Either (a) meeting the prior definition ‘for any continuous three-month period within the two years prior to the relevant date’ or (b) having ‘substantially contributed, as an author, editor, photographer, or producer, to a significant number of articles, stories, programs, or publications by an entity . . . within two years prior to the relevant date;’ or

    “Work as a student journalist ‘participating in a journalistic publication at an institution of higher education.’ ”

    IMO: Feinstein’s proposed redefinition would, in essence, place into Federal law such restrictions on the application of the term “journalist” — and would consequently also deny important legal protections to any person who, regardless of being otherwise qualified as a “journalist”, does not meet Feinstein’s definition of “journalist” — that Feinstein’s redefinition of the term becomes tantamount to a veiled threat of censorship and increased Government-corporate control of any news or commentary that may ever get a chance to see the light — if that news or commentary gets a chance at all.

    But, Feinstein aside, perhaps we do have a conundrum, especially if we consider how modern technology has already changed the field of “journalism” and “commenting” and “reporting” and “blogging” or “vlogging” (“video blogging”), and any combination of those terms and more of that nature.

    If a person writes, or otherwise presents, and disseminates, his or her reportage or commentary about any particular issue or set of issues, does that — and should that — constitute “journalism”? What if, in that presentation, the person makes a lot of sense — or makes no sense at all? What if that presentation, regardless of whether or not (or to what degree) it follows a reasonable or logical line of thought, might be objectionable to you or to someone else? What if that presentation praises, or lambasts, an official corporate or Government policy — or a corporate or Government official –, with whose views you do or do not agree? What if that presentation, whether or not its line of thought is reasonable, tears into a group that you favor — or even tears into YOU?

    Should the person presenting that presentation — or in any of these instances, for example — be accorded — or be refused — the title of “journalist” and the legal protections that “journalists” might receive?

    Now suppose that that same person does any of the above things as part of a “Governmentally-recognized” “journalistic entity”, or does any of the above things for a “salary”: why, if at all, should THESE “Governmentally-approved” qualifications make any difference to your answers to the above questions?

    Or SHOULD they?

    What IS a “journalist”? What IS “journalism”?

    Fore that matter, what IS “the press”?

    Does the term “the press” itself need to be redefined?

    Perhaps the ONE OVERRIDINGLY CRITICAL POINT is THIS:

    The FIRST AMENDMENT of the United States’ Constitution specifically states as follows:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”.

    In that regard, Feinstein’s proposed redefinition of what is and is not a “journalist” most assuredly does not — in my opinion — meet Constitutional muster, and — in my opinion — could itself well qualify as being a direct violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment.

    And what did the framers of the Constitution write of the intended meaning of the terms “freedom of speech, or of the press”? More than I can write in this little commentary, but, I submit, they appear to have put far greater thought to the meaning and importance of the concept of FREEDOM — and placed far higher value on protecting and maintaining that FREEDOM — than appears to me to be evident in Senator Feinstein’s proposal.

  • jzandensky

    Perhaps we should redefine ” politician” as a person duely elected, bound to Following the constitution by oath and promise to serve to Benefit those they represent.
    She wold fall outside either of these since she does neither.

  • rivahmitch

    Congress shall make no law …………….abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press….

    So, now that they’ve started their big move to destroy the 2nd Amendment with licensing (excuse me… Background Checks), they want to go after the 1st Amendment the same way, by licensing (excuse me…. defining who “the press” is). If one recalls history, one can make a strong case that today’s “bloggers” were the “pamphleteers” of the pre-revolutionary period… the very people the 1st Amendment was designed to protect. MOLON LABE can apply to computers and printing presses as well as guns. Semper Fi!

  • Don 2

    The real intent of Schumer, Feinstein, Durbin, and the rest of the Communist Democrat party, is to shut down opposition to the state run media. Same way as the intention of the Fairness Doctrine was to silence Conservative talk radio.

    • Vis Fac

      No one is forcing you to pay attention to the media.
      Libertas inaestimabilis res est
      Semper-Fi

      • Don 2

        Force Recon,
        Did you miss my point?

        • Vis Fac

          No I get it. Others are consumed by the lame stream media and think these crackpots are Gods of some sort that can dictate what is real media and what is not. I don’t pay attention to many politicos for I look at them as non entities and an issue of mind over matter I pay them no mind because they don’t matter.
          Libertas inaestimabilis res est
          Semper-Fi

          • Nadzieja Batki

            Since you are or were a military man then you should know that it is easier to hold your ground than it is to reclaim the ground you lost. There are enough people standing their ground and watching the Leftist human predators and thwarting them.

          • Vis Fac

            I certainly hope so. We have a bunch of “limp wristed” morons that are afraid of their own shadows so they enact inane statutes to control everyone els to feel safe.

            People respect strength and character liberals want to legislate these assets out of existence. I read today Gov’ Jerry Brown of the PRC (People’s Republic of Commiefornia) just signed a bill allowing T/G boys to use the girl’s restrooms and locker rooms in Commiefornia’s public schools. This is liberal one dimensional idiot-ology at its finest.

            Libertas inaestimabilis res est
            Semper-Fi

      • Nadzieja Batki

        You better pay attention to the media, how else will you know what the Leftists have in store for you. Believers in God abrogated their responsibility to go into politics because it was too grubby, they gave up the media because it was too grubby, they gave up education because it was too grubby, they didn’t go into hard science because it was too grubby, the same with law and religion. It may be too late to reclaim any ground taken over by the Leftists.

        • Vis Fac

          I don’t need the media to inform me on what the left has in mind. It’s the same thing just a different day-month-year-decade etc.. Nothing new.

          Libertas inaestimabilis res est
          Semper-Fi

  • Alan

    A real bad idea. After seeing the IRS in action, this will be another way for the socialist scum to silence an ideas but their own. Things are already too one sided in this country already.

    • Vis Fac

      Only if we let them!
      Libertas inaestimabilis res est
      Semper-Fi

  • TIME

    Dear People,
    Who is it again that has championed the removal of the Second Amendment again? Is that list a carbon copy or what?
    Now even if you live under a rock deep within the swamps of New Jersey the light should be coming on at some point.
    People the “ZIONEST Luciferian Talmud” followers are not hiding what they want to do to you, if you just open your eyes and ears they tell you every day what they are planning.
    Of what by the way these special people are not just with D’s by their names, again there is no difference between a D or and R within the “ZIONEST Luciferian Talmud” Guard.
    “YOU shall rule over the lesser nations / gentiles with an Iron hand, they will yield or they will die.” {{ Make slaves of them by the laws they must follow,}}
    Now think: NDAA, Patriot Act NSA, Spying, all the Bubbles of what ever kind, be it banking etc. All the LAWS written to destroy the Constitution and Bill of Rights, just look over the long list that’s been written be they “UN- LAWFUL” or not they are still written daily by these criminals who we have allowed to destroy this nation and every nation they covet for what ever they may have in natural resources.
    Ever question why you’re all called { “Human Resources?” }
    Learn what they are saying and what it really means, such as “Transparent” what O’Bama really said is that YOU will be more TRANSPARENT, not him nor his gang of Luciferian Thugs, Now is the NSA starting to really come to light, how about the TSA? How about all the “”””NEVER ENDING WARS?”””
    Peace and Love

    • Vis Fac

      The US Government has been conducting an undeclared clandestine war on the people for decades. We (as a nation) have become apathetic from entitlements and government programs appealing to the lethargic and indolent. Personal responsibility common sense and acuity have given way to political correctness.
      We no longer enjoy personal freedoms fought for by our forefathers because we eagerly listened to and believe the lies the political establishment used to lure into complacency We gladly gave them up for perceived safety that the government promised.
      Like Eve in the Garden of Eden the American people listened to Lucifer. Because we still listen and idolize Lucifer, God is now taking all that we hold dear away form us. We still have a spark of humanity left that we can use for redemption but must act quickly for the sand in the hourglass is almost gone.
      We as a people can say NO to laws that do not conform to OUR Constitution, we will need the courage that our forefathers had to do so. How many of you have that kind of courage?
      I do not want to live as a subject or a slave of the government. I have the courage to resist for death is preferable to the alternative. Those who oppose me should prepare for the consequences for I am not going without exercising my rights.
      Libertas inaestimabilis res est
      Semper-Fi

    • http://www.newsuperhuman.com/ newsuperhuman

      Wow, man, anti-Semitism is so cool. You graduate junior high school yet junior?

      • TIME

        Dear, human
        Do you even know what a Semite is?
        I would venture a bet you’re as clueless as your post displays, so that’s not going to work junior.
        Have a nice day junior ;-)

        • Nadzieja Batki

          Keep posting your stupidity, TIME, the Dems/Progs/Leftists need useful idiots like you to further their ideology.

          • TIME

            Dear NB,
            Thank you oh so much for your very warm post.
            Your post are very fruit that garner the people you noted far more than anything I could ever post.
            Again I thank you for your warm post and bid you a good day.

    • Transfixus

      Time, your note is the most idiotic rambling I’ve seen in years. What on God’s name is the “ZIONEST Luciferian Talmud?” What a bunch of total garbage! It’s fools like you who the Democrats will use to “define” conservatism, and defeat us.

  • Dave

    Feinstein is completely wrong here… The “media” has been in the midst of change especially internet based sources. New info can come from anyone, from anywhere. If it proven to be accurate info, why shouldn’t anyone not be protected?
    Feinstein is not beling malicious with this amendment, but she is guilty of old world thinking.

  • got my licence

    The first thing a dictator will do is take over the media. Control the message to control the minds. Second they use the existing government to discredit and distroy any oppisition. Third they pay off and reward those who play along. Sound familair.

  • $36364326

    Who is this sleeze bag to interpret the 4th amendment? We are not having a constitutional convention are we? Freedom of speech, the press, the right to bare arms will not be interpreted by these wannabe intellectuals who have NO experience dealing with this kind of issue. Leave this constitution to the wise men of yesterday. There are NO wise men today. They all assume they know what they are talking about and AAMOF they all just agree with each other because of the group consensus, which for them is total tyranny. I tell you what! Let’s, “we the people”, create our own government that has NO politicians involved. I’m sure there are enough americans, enough statesmen that really want the republic back, and we the people can overcome their money with sheer numbers! Lets pull an Egypt! I dare 5 million people to march on DC. October is GMO awareness month. That would be a great issue to rally a march in support of GMO labeling, in fact with numbers like that we could make GMO illegal at the same time that we oust the hypocrite liars in DC!

    • Vis Fac

      The few wise men of today want nothing to do with politics. That is why they are wise. Politics is a dirty business taken over by egotistical power hungry vermin. Sooner than later our economy will collapse and anarchy will ensue. We will then like the Phoenix rise for the ashes where we will start anew.
      Libertas inaestimabilis res est
      Semper-Fi

      • Transfixus

        If politics has become a dirty business, it has happened because decent citizens have abandoned the arena to dirty people. It’s time we all supported decent Americans who want to serve in public office, support them, vote for them and let’s see if we can turn things around. Politics doesn’t have to be a dirty business.

        • Vis Fac

          Transfixus:

          There is no “IF” politics has become dirty the fact is politics IS dirty.

          Contrary to liberal tenet we do not live in a utopia where we can wish things away, enact inane legislation hoping everyone will conform, or take from others what they have earned and give it to those who refuse to support themselves without consequences.

          Any living person has at least one skeleton in the closet, and a respectable person would not stand a chance in a political campaign. The amount of mud slung be it truth or not by the “dirty” politician is music to the ears of the uninformed and the lame stream media.

          I consider my self to be honest open, forthright, and a patriot. Liberals label me a terrorist and would have no compunction fabricating stories to assassinate and impugn my character. I would no more consider running for office than committing suicide.

          What is needed is to stand up and bring charges against those who operate outside the rule of law. The people have the power to effect change the only problem is complacency.

          For instance if for only one day all the people who work (except emergency and essential services) stayed home. What kind of an impact would that have? What kind of statement would that make to those who depend on us for their job or sustenance?

          This is only one example there are several that are more dramatic and have greater effect. the only thing stopping us is apathy.

          The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing–Edmund Burke

          A republic is defined as a state in which supreme
          power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president…Our republic no longer exists…A democracy can best be described as two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for lunch with a well armed sheep contesting the vote!

          Libertas inaestimabilis res est

          Semper-Fi

  • Vis Fac

    Have you ever noticed how many DUMBOCRITES introduce inane ineffective restrictive bills they want enacted into law? When was the last bill enacted that ALLOWED for something?
    Feinstein along with Piglost the PRC’s resident hypocrites continually show why term limits for congress is necessary. Their power hungry egos like many liberals keep them up at night dreaming on ways to further inflate their egos gain more power to subjugate the people. Neither of them know their A$$ from a hole in the ground yet think they can dictate policy to others.

    Feinstein looks crazed when speaking on firearms waiving them around like a lunatic. She herself has a CCP yet wants all of us disarmed the true meaning of a DUMBOCTRTE (hypocrite).
    The PRC is a large sinkhole where all common sense and reasoning evaporate into thin air. Unfortunately the PRC is leading the nation into oblivion.
    Libertas inaestimabilis res est
    Semper-Fi

  • ghendric

    That old psychopath needs to be put out to pasture…

  • ghendric

    That old psychopath needs to be put out to pasture…

  • liquid150

    Feinstein needs to just shrivel up and go away. She’s already about 50% there on the first part. Maybe if somebody throws water on her the witch will disappear?

    • wldy1005

      lol ^_^

  • ibn insha

    It is an attempt to shield government from the scrutiny of the public. That is what happens when government becomes too big and it is allowed to engage in activities other than its basic function of protecting the public. Is there a thing that government does not define? How did humanity manage for thousands of years without government defining things for us?

  • Patriot66

    When is this old bitch going to grow old an die…

    • Robbie

      At about the same rate as you.

  • J. W. Bercher

    What we really need, instead of some more laws, is 5 or 4 Senators in Federal Prison.

    • jibbs3

      You might want to multiply that by 12 oor more. And don’t forget the two at the top!

  • Michael Shreve

    ONLY the government gets to decide who is part of the propaganda ministry.

  • http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/7681.htm Augur Mayson

    We need to rise up and dispatch these Israel-First traitors.