Federal Judge Seeks To Thwart Obama’s Hypocritical Use Of ‘State Secrets’ Provision


The Federal government keeps a classified “no-fly” list of Americans and citizens of other Nations that it bars from traveling by air, allegedly to avoid a repeat of the tragic events on 9/11. To date, a “state secrets” law has meant that only the Executive branch can grant access to the list—but a Federal judge is challenging the provision.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco appears headed for a showdown with the Administration of President Barack Obama in his quest to make available to the court documents explaining why Malaysian citizen and former Stanford student Rahinah Ibrahim was denied travel and briefly detained at the San Francisco airport in 2005.

Alsup is using the seven-year-old case filed against the Feds by Ibrahim to force the Federal government to “show cause” as to why at least nine documents— some pertaining to the reasons for placing individuals on the “no fly” list— have been labeled as classified and kept from the plaintiff’s lawyers.

The judge, however, has made clear that he is not interested in reducing the Federal government’s power to retain information in the interest of national security in ordering that the government release records dating back to 2005 but allowing withholding of documents that pertain to “terrorist screening and watchlist procedures” from 2009 to now.

“There is some risk that disclosure of these documents would hinder frank and ongoing discussion regarding contemplated visa decisions. Nevertheless, these documents are highly relevant to plaintiff’s claims and are not available from any other source,” Alsup wrote in an order issued Friday. “The other factors that outweigh the government’s assertion of the [deliberative process privilege] likewise play a substantial role here. Plaintiff has properly pled constitutional claims challenging alleged government misconduct. This creates a strong interest in accurate fact-finding for plaintiff and for society, and a strong interest in the enforcement of the constitutional protections asserted in plaintiff’s complaint.”

Attorney General Eric Holder and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper have both filed declarations in the case, supporting the Administration’s view that the no-questions-asked “state secrets” policy should remain intact in Ibrahim’s case.

Remarkably transparent to the Obama Administration’s complete disregard for the campaign promises the President has made, however, is this: In 2008, both Obama and Holder went on record ripping the Administration of George W. Bush for using “state secrets” to thwart civil liberties lawsuits. Holder even went on to make the executive privilege more difficult after taking office. But despite the public proclamations, the Obama Administration has repeatedly used the same policy as Bush to block litigation related to warrantless wiretapping, drone usage and cases of Federal spying.

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • vladilyich

    This IS NOT due process. A person has no way no way of knowing if they are or are not on the list until they show up at the airport and are arrested on unknown charges. I know this as fact because:
    a) I am an American citizen, born and raised in Baltimore.
    b) I disagree with about 90% of what the government has become.
    c) I do not currently live in the United States.

    The previous three times I returned to the U.S. I was arrested on trumped up charges and got several free meals courtesy of the government. Getting out of the U.S. is not a problem, but returning is. Why? Because of “executive privilege”, I am prevented from any type of due process. Can fly to Europe or Asia out of Canada or Mexico, but not the U.S.