Personal Liberty Digest™ will be upgraded this weekend to reflect a dynamic new look and mobile-friendly viewing to enhance your experience! Plus, we'll be providing even more of the compelling content you've come to expect, delivered in a whole new way!

  Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Do As I Say, Not As I Do: Two Stories About Aiding Terrorists With Very Different Endings

November 13, 2013 by  

Do As I Say, Not As I Do: Two Stories About Aiding Terrorists With Very Different Endings
PHOTOS.COM

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the authority charged with providing oversight of reconstruction efforts in the war-torn nation, suggests that American taxpayers have paid more than $150 million to 43 Mideast companies with strong ties to terrorism.

Using data compiled from classified Pentagon documents and a list of terror-linked companies compiled by the Commerce Department, SIGAR found numerous examples of funds for rebuilding provided by the U.S. government making it into terrorist hands.

According to ABC, one of the most extreme examples involved U.S. contracts with a road construction firm whose owners have direct ties to the anti-American Haqqani network — an organization that the Federal government declared a terrorist group last September.

The news network reported that a U.S. Army investigation concluded that the firm and its owners were directly involved “in the facilitation and operation of the Haqqani Network” and that “approximately $1-2 million per month flow[s] to Haqqani Network to finance its activities.”

But SIGAR representatives say that, despite the findings, the Pentagon has rejected calls to deny funds to companies with terrorist ties for fear of violating the contractors’ “due process,” as they are unable to view the classified information that links them to terrorists.

“The reason they’ve given us is that it’s not fair to these contractors that the evidence that we’ve presented, and this is evidence collected by the United States government, is classified,” John Sopko, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), told ABC News. “That’s the absurdity of it. We can probably attack them via drone on Monday and we’ll issue them a contract on Tuesday.”

Last December, Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) were joined by a coalition of Senators — Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Jim Webb (D-Va.), James Inhofe (R-Okla.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) — in sending Pentagon officials a letter urging the U.S. military apparatus to discontinue business with terror-linked businesses in the Mideast.

“An effective and timely suspension and debarment process is critical to ensuring appropriate use of taxpayer dollars in Afghanistan, as well as for preventing these funds from flowing to criminal and terrorist networks,” the Senators wrote almost a year ago. “With these concerns in mind, we ask that you closely review the 43 cases involving terrorist groups that are still pending before the suspension and debarment branch. In addition, we ask that you ensure the Army processes future referrals from Afghanistan in a deliberate and timely manner.”

But according to SIGAR, the Pentagon continues to place taxpayer dollars into the hands of terror-affiliated companies in the region. That means American taxpayers are rebuilding the nation the U.S. tore apart in an effort to defeat “terror” while simultaneously funding terror.

Meanwhile, Basit Javed Sheikh, 29, of Cary, N.C., was arrested by the FBI earlier this month of at Raleigh-Durham International Airport as he was preparing to board a one-way flight to Lebanon. The man, a legal permanent U.S. resident from Pakistan, was picked up on charges of attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization.

Sheikh was nabbed after he corresponded with a Facebook account set up by a confidential FBI source and an undercover operative who posed as a “trusted brother” of Jabhat al-Nusrah, a mostly Sunni Muslim jihadist organization involved in the fight to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The FBI said that Sheikh was eager to travel to Syria and join the group in its fight against Assad — something that President Barack Obama, Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) and a handful of other lawmakers called for the U.S. military to do a little more than a month ago.

“I want to help in any way I can,” Sheikh wrote online, according to an affidavit, adding: “I’m serious [brother]. … I’m not scared. … I’m [sic] have though it out. … I’m ready.”

Sheikh, who paid for a one-way ticket to go fight alongside Syrian rebels in a conflict that would likely have led to his demise, all without U.S. taxpayer dollars, faces up to 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

The aforementioned reports are different in nature: one about the government sending your money to terrorists to keep the military-industrial complex well-oiled, and the other about an individual headed off to fight alongside terrorists whom the Federal government told Americans, just months ago, deserve support. But reading them alongside one another should raise some serious questions about U.S. policy in the Mideast and the true meaning of this never-ending “war on terror.” The stories should also make Americans wonder to whom U.S. law does and doesn’t apply.

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Do As I Say, Not As I Do: Two Stories About Aiding Terrorists With Very Different Endings”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.