Democrat Rep Wants Guns With Electronics Making Them Inoperable To All But Owner… Says He Got The Idea From James Bond


Representative John Tierney (D-Mass.) recently watched the latest James Bond movie, “Skyfall,” and came up with what he thought was a great idea: handguns with “personalization technology.”

“In the most recent James Bond film, Bond escapes death when his handgun, which is equipped with technology that recognizes him as its owner, becomes inoperable when it gets into the wrong hands,” Tierney’s office said in a statement introducing the bill. “This technology, however, isn’t just for the movies — it’s a reality.”

In his Personalized Handgun Safety Act, H.R. 2005, Tierney calls for all new guns made in the United States to come with technology that would disallow anyone but the gun owner to fire the weapon. He also wants older guns to be retrofitted with the technology.

The lawmaker believes that passing his bill will mean fewer tragedies resulting from children getting their hands on unattended firearms.

“Accidents like this are not as rare as we want to believe, and they are preventable,” he said. “Whether a gun owner or not, a NRA member or not, we should be able to agree on gun safety measures that will make our families and communities safer. This technology needs to be put into action.”

The Children’s Defense Fund Action Council and 13 House Democrat sponsors have backed the bill.

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • JimH

    It’s for child “safety”.
    You can use a 2 thousand dollar device that may or may not work, or you can get a 2 dollar trigger lock.
    You can also teach the child firearm safety. We survived having no trigger locks or James Bond gizmo’s. Just our brains.
    What is Rep. Tierney’s real motive?
    Could it be to make a firearm so expensive we can’t afford it?
    To make us retrofit our old guns, so we get a unexpected added expense decades after we bought the gun?
    What if you want to teach the child to shoot? Would you need to reprogram the device? Now the child can shoot it and the whole reason for one is gone, unless you put a 2 dollar trigger lock on it.
    The opposite of PROgress is CONgress.