Critics Blast Obama Administration’s Decision To Read Terrorist Suspect His Miranda Rights


Critics blast Obama administration's decision to read terrorist suspect his Miranda rightsRepublican leaders heavily criticized the Obama administration last week for allowing officials to read Faisal Shahzad his Miranda rights soon after he had been taken into custody for allegedly attempting to detonate a car bomb in Times Square over the weekend.

Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.), Christopher “Kit” Bond (R-Mo.) and Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) all conveyed their disappointment with the administration’s decision to not classify Shahzad as an enemy combatant, a move that would have allowed investigators to hold the suspect indefinitely, according to The New York Times.

Officials with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) said that Shahzad was originally interrogated under a public safety exemption, and was then read his Miranda rights soon after authorities determined there was no imminent threat. Officials with the FBI said Shahzad provided them with "valuable intelligence and evidence" both before and after being advised of his rights.

In response to the incident, Lieberman announced on Wednesday that he will propose a bill that would strip alleged terrorists of their citizenship immediately after being detained, reports. The senator indicated that he would attempt to amend a current law that revokes a person’s citizenship if they join a foreign army.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.