Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Court Delays Review On Same-Sex Marriage

WASHINGTON, (UPI) –  The U.S. Supreme Court Monday indicated it has delayed a decision on whether to hear argument in any of an array of cases dealing with same-sex marriage.

Eight challenges to the federal Defense of Marriage Act, a similar Arizona law and California’s Proposition 8, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman, were considered during the high court’s closed conference last Friday.

But a check of the Supreme Court’s docket Monday showed the cases have been rescheduled for a conference this Friday.

DOMA, enacted in 1996, says federal benefits and considerations for married couples apply only to heterosexual unions. The Obama administration is enforcing the 1996 act, but is one of the main challengers in court.

Section 3, which is targeted in all the DOMA cases, says, “In determining the meaning of any act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”

“Although Section 3 of DOMA does not purport to invalidate same-sex marriages in those states that permit them,” the administration told the Supreme Court in a petition brief it “excludes such marriages from recognition for purposes of more than 1,000 federal statutes and programs whose administration turns in part on individuals’ marital status. … Section 3 of DOMA thus denies to legally married same-sex couples many substantial benefits otherwise available to legally married opposite-sex couples under federal employment, immigration, public health and welfare, tax and other laws.”

California voters approved Proposition 8, the California Marriage Protection Act, in 2008 with slightly more than 52 percent for, nearly 48 percent against. Prop 8 said in part, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Court Delays Review On Same-Sex Marriage”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

    I TOLD “ALL OF Y’ALL” THIS WOULD HAPPEN – Y’ALL WOULD NOT BELIEVE ME.

    NOW, SINCE THE KENYAN IS A “LAME DUCK,” THERE IS NO NEED FOR A NATIONALIZATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.

    CAUCASIAN HOMOSEXUALS, Y’ALL “HAVE BEEN HAD!” – THE KENYAN TOOK YOUR MONEY [OVER NINE MILLION] AND, “RAN!!!!!”

  • JON

    The ONLY people that should be concerned about same-sex marriage are the two getting married. The rest is total [expletive deleted]

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.