Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

CIA Must Release Some Drone Info, But Don’t Expect Much

March 18, 2013 by  

CIA Must Release Some Drone Info, But Don’t Expect Much
PHOTOS.COM

A Federal appeals court last week ruled that the Central Intelligence Agency must comply with a Freedom of Information Act request for details on the agency’s drone program filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The ACLU filed the initial FOIA request in January 2010. In September of the next year, a district court gave the CIA permission to remain silent. The court ruled that the CIA’s drone program was a matter of national security and allowed CIA officials to reply to the query with a Glomar response. In matters of national security or privacy, Glomar responses to FOIA requests give government agencies the power to “neither confirm nor deny” the request.

The ACLU issued an appeal to the response, and the District of Columbia U.S. Court of appeals sided with the civil liberty organization.

From the ruling:

The CIA has proffered no reason to believe that disclosing whether it has any documents at all about drone strikes will reveal whether the Agency itself — as opposed to some other U.S. entity such as the Defense Department — operates drones. There is no doubt, however, that such disclosure would reveal whether the Agency “at least has an intelligence interest in drone strikes.”

The court further ruled that because the President has publicly acknowledged the use of drones by U.S. agencies, the “neither confirm nor deny” statute doesn’t stand in the case.

The court cited an answer President Barack Obama gave during a live Internet video forum. Obama had said: “I think that we have to be judicious in how we use drones. But understand that probably our ability to respect the sovereignty of other countries . . . is enhanced by the fact that we are able to pinpoint-strike an al Qaeda operative in a place where the capacities of th[e] military in that country may not be able to get them. So obviously a lot of these strikes have been . . . going after al Qaeda suspects who are up in very tough terrain along the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

The court did rule, however, that the CIA has flexibility in how much information it must reveal about its drone activities. As the Obama Administration has demonstrated a very poor record on FOIA compliance to date, it is feasible that the ACLU will receive the same sort of taunting FOIA response it did late last year when seeking information from the Justice Department on GPS tracking.

The appellate ruling comes amid heightened American awareness of the Federal government’s growing fondness for drones, driven by Senator Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) questions of whether they could be used against Americans on U.S. soil as well as strong international rebuke over the United States’ drone policy elsewhere.

Ben Emmerson, the U.N. special rapporteur monitoring human rights in counter-terrorism programs, chided U.S. officials for allowing drone strikes to continue in Pakistan where the Nation is not at war.

“As a matter of international law the US drone campaign in Pakistan is therefore being conducted without the consent of the elected representatives of the people, or the legitimate government of the state,” he said. “It involves the use of force on the territory of another state without its consent and is therefore a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.”

Emmerson’s criticisms are shared by a number of human rights groups upset at the number of civilian casualties resulting from the Pakistani drone strikes.

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “CIA Must Release Some Drone Info, But Don’t Expect Much”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • http://gravatar.com/plfprime GALT

    Waste of time unless the CIA has direct control of the drones involved.

    DHS and INS ( border patrol ) would be better bets.

    As for useful info, non redacted….see US v. Reynolds

    or “you have NO shot”……but it’s useful stuff if you have ambitions for 2016.

    ( and it’s not like you have anything better to do till then. )

  • RAND PAUL & BEN CARSON IN 2016

    Any stats will be totally bogus anyway: Obummer unilaterally & probably illegally changed the definition of an enemy combatant to “any young adult male in targeted area, whether they have evidence they are involved in terrorist activity or not”, thus he using them like a fly-swatter or machine gun , over 600 in a little over 4 years compared to Bush’s 43 in 8 years, and with this definiton, he can use them in more public places killing more innocents… Also, the repulsive “Double Tap”, kills many innocents & rescue workers trying to save lives…is it any wonder they keep hating us & more & more jihadists are spawned ready to blow themselves up to destroy the Great Satan!! These are War Crimes, plain & simple!!! Where is the ICC when you need it???? Oh, I forgot , it’s Obummer, a Lib/PC/BS/Dem, , not an evil Goper like Bush!!!

    Nobel Peace Prize Winner???……..LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • ibcamn

    Good luck with that!

  • http://www.facebook.com/michael.shreve.94 Michael Shreve

    Lies, damned lies, statistics and government information.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.