Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Chinese Group Plans To Sue Obama Over UnConstitutional Action

October 2, 2012 by  

Chinese Group Plans To Sue Obama Over UnConstitutional Action
UPI
President Barack Obama issued an order targeting a Chinese wind farm company.

A Chinese company is planning to sue the President over actions it claims are unConstitutional.

According to Ralls Corp., a company that builds wind farms, President Barack Obama halted a project in Oregon. The company wants to be paid for the losses it incurred — losses it claims will be near $25 million.

Last week, Obama issued an order giving the company 90 days to sell four of its wind farm sites. Plus, he ordered that all of its equipment must be gone in two weeks.

The President believes that the green company, which has several locations near a U.S. Navy test site in Oregon, could be a national security threat.

But Ralls Corp. claims there are many other wind turbines in the area and that Obama’s order is a violation of the Constitution.

“The selective and arbitrary singling out of Ralls’ project drives our effort to seek redress in U.S. courts,” said Tim Xia, counsel for the company. “We are confident that the courts will vindicate Ralls’ rights under the law and the Constitution and we intend to pursue the remedies that the law makes available.”

Legal analysts say the courts will be reluctant to question the President’s decision.

Ralls is being advised by the assistant attorney general and solicitor general from George W. Bush’s Administration.

Bryan Nash

Staff writer Bryan Nash has devoted much of his life to searching for the truth behind the lies that the masses never question. He is currently pursuing a Master's of Divinity and is the author of The Messiah's Misfits, Things Unseen and The Backpack Guide to Surviving the University. He has also been a regular contributor to the magazine Biblical Insights.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Chinese Group Plans To Sue Obama Over UnConstitutional Action”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Dinh c Dao

    Thank you Mr. President!
    It about time to kick them out. Chinese companies are untrust, unworthy! Many of them open businesses in the U.S with the China Red Fat Tofu central goverment money.
    Remember their eyes are small but it can COPY very fast, look at what they are currently exporting…Their originally invention are fire works and soysauce without a dout! Their businesses are even copy Toy models from all over the world then made them with cheaper materials. High tech export from China are all COPY from other developed nations!
    We shall not affraid of people who wants to learn but we should be scare of the mamal that just short cut, copy, stealing your ideas then product cheap stubs without care for the rest of mankind globally! This kind of mamal only care for their own stomach and selfishness.

    Guys, I have been learning this mammal behavior for 40 years, yes but never enough and keep wonder about it going ambition!

    • Robert Smith

      Remember, that CHINESE company can buy elections in America because the right likes the idea of it being a “person.”

      Yup, elections bought and paid for by corporations owned by the CHINESE.

      Brought to you by the Republicans.

      Rob

      • momo

        You forgot your usual “brutal God” anti-Christian remark.

      • Dinh c Dao

        Dear Bob
        You are correct, they donated in to our Presidential campaign once( or more?). China dirty money went in to our politic and finacial system!
        Be aware, China money is influenting this country thinking! Our goverment knows but try nothing to stop that because of personal greed!

        China long ago wants to FREE OWN globally, that country thinks it is The Central of nations! We as the U.S has been feeding a monster up to the point it got so big and swalowing it feeder… Thank you Nixon who digged the U.S grave!

        My great Grand Father had tell me: ” I rather work for a White men than work for any Yellow men!”.
        You know what Bob, he was a Yellow men himself!

        Dean

      • Vigilant

        No, RS, thank William Jefferson Clinton.

        “The 1996 United States campaign finance controversy, also known as Chinagate, was an alleged effort by the People’s Republic of China to influence domestic American politics during the 1996 federal elections.

        “The issue first received public attention in early 1997, with news that a Justice Department investigation had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in violation of U.S. laws regarding foreign political contributions. The Chinese government denied all accusations. Twenty-two people were eventually convicted of fraud or for funneling Asian funds into the United States elections, and others fled U.S. jurisdiction. Several of these were associates of Bill Clinton or Al Gore.” (Wikipedia)

        P.S. Citizens United decision does not condone or authorize such contributions, contrary to you and Obama’s assertions otherwise.

      • Vigilant

        RS also makes the claim, “…Remember, that CHINESE company [sic] can buy elections in America because the right likes the idea of it being a “person.”

        The legal concept of corporations being artifical persons has been around for almost 200 years. Try again, ignorant one.

      • BigArch

        You are right Vigilant, we can all remember the story about AlBore carrying a large sack of cash given by the Chinese to the Bill Clinton campaign. How about all the stimulas money going to Chinese “green: companies?
        Republcans are probably guilty but the demoRATs are up front with their begging for foreign funds to buy votes.

      • http://www.facebook.com/benjamin.fox.98892 Benjamin Fox

        Robert Smith, get your head out of where the sun don’t shine, Slick Willie on the left bought votes via the Chinese, not the right, or have you become such a robot, you just repeat lie’s and hope they stick like your illegal citizen in chief? Now I know how Hitler came to power, he controlled the minds of the Robot’s and just let them lose on the people. I give you my salute to your brains less comment, my right hand, middle finger salute to you and your messiah islamist in chief.

      • Robert Smith

        “The legal concept of corporations being artifical persons has been around for almost 200 years. ”

        But it was only recently that it’s been legal for them to contribute on a wholesale basis to political campaigns.

        If a Chinese owned corporation in America…

        Well, you get the picture. And it’s the right wing that made it legal as the rest of us oppose our companies and elections being bought off.

        Rob

      • Vigilant

        “And it’s the right wing that made it legal as the rest of us oppose our companies and elections being bought off.”

        Guess you didn’t oppose the buying of elections by big labor unions very strenuously, did you? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and Citizens United leveled the playing field so unions don’t have the unfair advantage they’ve had for decades.

        Eat your heart out, fool.

        See http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

      • Smilee

        Vigilant says:
        October 2, 2012 at 5:24 pm

        BIG LABOR?????????? Your funny, 12% of the workers are in unions and less that one in ten are in the private sector and you call that big?? God what joke they have never been over 35% union in the US and that was 40 years ago. Sure companies and union haters try to portray it as such to further there own vested purposes but honest people do not buy that BS as they know better. Total union expenditures for politics and lobbying is only $1.00. for every $65.00 total dollars spent by corporations. Imagine Goliath being 65 feet tall and David one foot tall and Vig then would call David Big!! It’s a jopke and PURE BULL

      • Vigilant

        As usual, smilee ignores the facts provided by URL linkage and then makes a claim unsupported by anything other than an assertion. This leftist tactic was evident in his totally uninformed and illogical position on another thread where he claimed that slavery was unconstitutional prior to the 13th Amendment.

        But, we’ve grown to accept smilee’s ignorance AND stupidity. Ignorance can be fixed, but stupidity is forever.

        • Smilee

          VIG

          The truth is neither left or right it is just the truth which you deny and if you disagree just label it leftist as if that somehow makes it false even if it is true. This post was about the size of Unions not about anything else but lacking an intelligent response to what I said in this post you went off on a tangent to a subject totally not related to it and used that absurdity to attempt to divert from these truths in this post which you attacked in the same manner as most posts you respond to. It is well known and documented as to what share of the labor force is union that should not be a question and the 65:1 ratio of spending is the current ratio reported just this week in the nations newspapers on articles reporting on current campaign spending, you did nothing to answer that, Is it that you know the truth and do not care or is it that it does not support your biases or are you just so uninformed. You often label things leftist which I guess in your mind is any position you attack of those with whom you disagree and the truth when established honestly would expose your deceit. The truth is the truth and nothing else, so if you disagree with what I said why not argue just the merit of this post rather than use BS and innuendo which has become your trademark of not staying on message. You rarely address what I say but are always trying to do an end run to avoid doing so and that lends itself to conversation that is totally one sided, your side or nothing and thus your frustrations which seem to lead to a lot of name calling which appears that you may think this somehow supports your point. It does not.

      • Smilee

        Vigilant says:
        October 2, 2012 at 9:08 am

        P.S. Citizens United decision does not condone or authorize such contributions, contrary to you and Obama’s assertions otherwise.

        RESPONSE:

        Your right, it just made it legal and I believe that is what Obama’s real objection is which you again spin and distort.

      • Vigilant

        I said, “Citizens United decision does not condone or authorize such contributions, contrary to you and Obama’s assertions otherwise.”

        smilee’s RESPONSE:

        “Your [sic] right, it just made it legal and I believe that is what Obama’s real objection is which you again spin and distort.”

        Caught you in a flat lie, sonny. Citizen’s United IN NO WAY made contributions from foreign sources legal. Period. End of discussion.

      • Vigilant

        “You rarely address what I say but are always trying to do an end run to avoid doing so…”

        ANOTHER fat lie, little boy. I ALWAYS address your comments. You are the one who inevitably attempts to take the conversation off into the weeds.

      • Vigilant

        Smilee says, “This post was about the size of Unions not about anything else but lacking an intelligent response to what I said in this post you went off on a tangent to a subject totally not related to it…”

        Third BIG lie. The size of union membership has nothing to do with my earlier comment. The FUNDING provided to Democrats by unions was the subject, or is your attention span truncated by watching too many American Idol shows?

        Bet you didn’t even check out the link I provided, and if you did, it didn’t fit in with your myopic and leftist views so you disregarded it.

        65 to 1? Too bad it’s not 1,000 to 1.

        • Smilee

          VIG,

          There you go again changing the subject and going again off on a tangent, why is it you have to change what I said and then address that rather than what I accurately said., it makes you look stupid.

          Your Statement quoted here below , also they have always money wise had a disadvantage but did have more political clout 40 years that they do now and it has been going down since the eighties but never was it a level playing field, that is clearly documented. You apparently hate unions so you lie about them.

          YOUR WORDS:

          Guess you didn’t oppose the buying of elections by big labor unions {big labor unions was your words I responded to and you said I responded something else when I did not, another lie of yours} very strenuously, did you? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and Citizens United leveled the playing field so unions don’t have the unfair advantage they’ve had for decades.

          eat your heart out, fool.

          My response now is added here:

          Unions were never on a level playing field but at one time even non union workers supported unions which few do today but they have never had a level playing field and without that non union support they would not got anywhere near where they got but the unions themselves have never had the monies corporations had..

          MY FIRST RESPONSE WAS:

          BIG LABOR?????????? Your funny, 12% of the workers are in unions and less that one in ten are in the private sector and you call that big?? God what joke they have never been over 35% union in the US and that was 40 years ago. Sure companies and union haters try to portray it as such to further there own vested purposes but honest people do not buy that BS as they know better. Total union expenditures for politics and lobbying is only $1.00. for every $65.00 total dollars spent by corporations. Imagine Goliath being 65 feet tall and David one foot tall and Vig then would call David Big!! It’s a jopke and PURE BULL

          “Then you responded to the post with:”

          Smilee says, “This post was about the size of Unions not about anything else but lacking an intelligent response to what I said in this post you went off on a tangent to a subject totally not related to it…”
          Third BIG lie. {reread above what I actually said, it should make you realize your lie} The size of union membership has nothing to do with my earlier comment. {see your earlier comment above, these are your words not mine and that is your words I responded too not what you claim in this post< the liar is clearly you} The FUNDING provided to Democrats by unions was the subject, {I responded to your words above and not this, comprehension here is what you seem unable to do} or is your attention span truncated by watching too many American Idol shows? {another one of your stupid statements that have nothing to do with either subject}

          Bet you didn’t even check out the link I provided, {I did but it was not the issue that I addressed so what has that got to do with the price of tea in China} and if you did, it didn’t fit in with your myopic and leftist views so you disregarded it. {I was talking about facts and the truth and just what does that got to do with leftist views. You apparently view what you term leftist as being the truth as you cannot have it both ways}

          65 to 1? Too bad it’s not 1,000 to 1. {I guess you are supportive of power in balances, that was the basis for slavery too. The founders mostly believed in balance of power something you must detest}

           Vigilant says:
          October 3, 2012 at 6:26 am
          As usual, smilee ignores the facts provided by URL linkage and then makes a claim unsupported by anything other than an assertion. This leftist tactic was evident in his totally uninformed and illogical position on another thread where he claimed that slavery was unconstitutional prior to the 13th Amendment.
          But, we’ve grown to accept smilee’s ignorance AND stupidity. Ignorance can be fixed, but stupidity is forever.

          Vigilant says:
          October 2, 2012 at 9:08 am
          P.S. Citizens United decision does not condone or authorize such contributions, contrary to you and Obama’s assertions otherwise.
          MY RESPONSE:
          Your right, it just made it legal and I believe that is what Obama’s real objection is which you again spin and distort.

          And then your response to it:

          I said, “Citizens United decision does not condone or authorize such contributions, contrary to you and Obama’s assertions otherwise.”
          smilee’s

          RESPONSE:

          “Your [sic] {your insert} right, it just made it legal and I believe that is what Obama’s real objection is which you again spin and distort.”
          Caught you in a flat lie, sonny. Citizen’s United IN NO WAY made contributions from foreign sources legal. Period. End of discussion.

          MY Response to it:

          There you go again, I never said anything about contributions from foreign sources them are your words and you contribute them to me and you call me the liar, it is you whom are the guilty one on both lies which you so frequently do, you say I said it and then say end of discussion, no way will I allow you to end it on a bold face lie and if you do not recognize that to yourself then your delusional as well..

      • Vigilant

        “There you go again, [sic] I never said anything about contributions from foreign sources them [sic] are your words and you contribute [sic] them to me and you call me the liar, [sic] it is you whom [sic] are the guilty one on both lies which you so frequently do, [sic] you say I said it and then say end of discussion, [sic] no way will I allow you to end it on a bold [sic] face [sic] lie and if you do not recognize that to [sic] yourself then your [sic] delusional as well..”

        Probably could have found another “sic” or two, but I’m lazy tonight. I change my recommendation: take a course in elementary English before you take that “Constitution for Dummies” course.

        I’m really concerned about your disintegration right in front of my eyes. Better take some meds, calm down and reconcile yourself to the fact that you are outclassed in every possible matter for discussion by yours truly. You’ll feel better tomorrow morning.

        • Smilee

          VIG, WOW!! you have now shown your all out of anything intelligent to say not even any lies, just a whole lot of garbage that only serves to brightly illustrate your stupidity and total lack of character. What a sicko you are!!!!!!

      • Mac

        To control a nation you need only to control their debt. John Adams

        The Chinese do and they will, unless we do something about our debt and who controls it.

    • Gordon

      Commies a security threat?

    • Gordon

      WE have already handed the commies control of 80% of our economy. Soon they will fork us. hide and watch.

      • Gordon

        4) Based on the Treasury’s most recent statistics, US government interest payments to China will total at least $26.055 billion this year. The real figure may be much higher given that China has been purchasing Treasuries for decades, back when interest rates were much higher. They’re still getting paid on those higher rates today.

        Even still, this year’s interest payment to China totals more than ALL the silver that was mined in the world last year.

      • Gordon
  • eddie47d

    No atta boy on this article which left out important information on who this Ralls Company really is. Although Ralls is an American company based in Delaware it is a subsidiary of Sany Group Co whose headquarters is located in China and owned by the Chinese. Welcome to this world wide economy. This wind farm was indeed built within restricted military airspace.I don’t see where this would be a security risk whether built by Americans or the Chinese so please provide more details.

    • SJJolly

      Cameras, radio frequency antennas, and microphones mounted on the wind towers could eavesdrop on activity at the Weapons Test Facility next door to them.

  • Larry K.

    how’s the chinese going to sue the anti-christ?

    • General : Bull ” Shipper

      Larry K. Obozo is not the antichrist. The antichrist will come from Jerusalem, is a body builder, and a homosexual,and a great orator among other things. Obozo does not fit this description. Look in Daniel 7th and 8th chapter for the description of the antichrist.

      • SJJolly

        D*mn, you just spoiled a pet belief of the Religious Right, that Obama is the anti-Christ!

  • bwilly123

    does anyone have a comment about whether the President is violating the constitution or not? Personally, I think the argument that there are lots of other wind turbines in the area doesn’t hold water unless they are also owned by a foreign power that is not our ally.

  • Chester

    The problem with this set of wind farms wasn’t the Chinese government’s ownership of the company so much as it was the location of these farms and the absolute fact that they could easily have been used to spy on our top secret military equipment. Seems our electronic warfare planes regularly fly over where these wind farms are located as they take off and land at the nearby air force base, and it would be hard to find a better spot to use eyeballs and other equipment to see exactly what types of equipment these planes carry and how it is used.

  • JimH

    Obama had better be careful about making China angry. They may cut off his favorite Chinese import, cash.
    He needs China to pay for his irresposible spending.

    • momo

      Don’t worry the fed will just print more dollars.

    • eddie47d

      Was that an attempt at humor Jim H.? Most of the debt to China occurred before Obama was elected.

      • JimH

        Is that your attempt to make up facts eddie?
        Money has come from China in the last 4 years.(fact)
        The printing press has been busy also.

    • http://www.facebook.com/robbie.borot Robbie Borot

      JIM YOU MAY BE CORRECT ABOUT CHINA’S WIND FARM EVICTION RETALIATION IN WHICH IF THEY STOP LENDING US MONEY IT COULD RESULT TO A POSSIBLE GLOBAL BANK FREEZE AND WHEN THAT HAPPENS IT MAY BE MARSHAL LAW IN AMERICA LIKE IT ALMOST WAS DURING THE 2008 BAIL OUT ARGUMENTS

  • ROGER, Irih-Canadian LIBERTARIAN

    I have been following Personal Liberty Digest for a few years now and can see no where else the Bigotry, “Redneckish” and slavish following of Mainsteam media discrimination mantra being voiced. When it is not the fault of Muslims, it is Mexicans and when not Mexicans it is China BUT never is the U.S. at fault ……Is it any wonder the U.S. is finished????

    It takes COURAGe to admit when you are at fault and ONLY then can you heal and grow, but judging by the comments throughout PLD it looks like that time is far away for America !!!

    • JimH

      Well Roger, maybe when Canada grows up to be big, it can take over being a world leader from the U.S.
      Did it even occur to you that some of these problems may really be caused by ILLEGAL imigrants, RADICAL islam, and maybe a little from China?
      I understand the U.S. isn’t perfect, but the last perfect man to walk the earth went and
      got crucified.
      When there is an earth quake, sunami, huricane or any other natural disaster, anywhere in the world, where does Canada stand, compared to the U.S., when it comes to disaster relief?
      You live right next door, have the same natural resources, the same heritage, the same educational opportunities, what’s the problem?

      • ROGER, Irish-Canadian LIBERTARIAN

        Well “JimH”, the U.S. is NOT a world leader…IT IS a world aggressor and I certainly hope Canada doesn’t become another U.S.imitator although our Prime Minister certainly is doing his best at “sucking-up” to th U.S. and other Zionists.Leaders dont have to FORCE others to do their bidding. They TEACH, PERSUADE and are PATIENT but not march in with guns blazing. and STEAL resouorces, murdeer millions of men women and children.Check your country’s history, IF you still believe you are leaders…AND by the way I am also IRISH

        What is happening around the world speaks for itself.

      • JimH

        Like I said, when it comes to disaster relief, where do the Canadians or Irish stand compared to the U.S. You didn’t answer.
        Even though you have the potential, same resources, education and heritage, you lag behind. What’s the problem? You didn’t answer.
        You don’t need to worry about Canada being a world aggressor, even if you wanted to.
        I’d like to know more about the MILLIONS of men, women and children that were murdered by us. When, where, how, things like that.
        I would also like to know more about the STOLEN resources. I know we buy raw materials and goods from other countries. It helps their economy too.
        Compaired to the U.S. where does Canada and Ireland stand in the giving of foriegn aid, or helping others in need around the world with private charities? Red Cross, Save the Children, Feed my Starving Children, You know, the ones I’m sure YOU personaly donate to.
        I know my countries history, aparently better than you do.
        You never answered my question about if the Illegal Imigrants or Radical Islamists could maybe be a problem and it may not be ALL us. But I never really expect answers to my questions because you my need to rethink your oppinion.
        This bigoted, slavish, redneck would like to know.

        • Dinh c Dao

          Dear JimH
          You are 110% correct!

      • Dale left coast

        ROGER, Irish-Canadian LIBERTARIAN . . . probably lives in Ontario of Quebec . . . both these provinces are just as BROKE as California. And of course Ireland is also among the bankrupt Euro socialist states . . .
        Roger says “march in with guns blazing. and STEAL resources, murdeer millions of men women and children.” ? ? ? Roger me thinks your Nutty-Bone has come loose in your head . . . never happened . . . only in your weak lieberal mind ! ! !

      • SJJolly

        JimH: “It helps their economy too.” Look up the terms of NAFTA and similar treaties. If the raw material-providing countries party to the agreements enact legislation to build up their economies, such as enacting environmental, minimum wage, or labor laws, they can be sued for restraint of trade by US companies buying their raw materials. The agreements are designed to help the ruling classes at the expense of the workers, at both ends of the treaties.

      • JimH

        SSJOLLY, Maybe we shouldn’t buy their materials, and none of those people would have a job or make money, comrad.
        My point to Roger was we BUY it, not steal it.
        And it does more for that countries economy to have us or someone buy it than to NOT develope it.
        It DOES help the other countries economy, even though it may not be the way YOU want it to.

    • http://www.facebook.com/nancy.miller.961993 Nancy Miller

      Japan attacked us first , were we supposed to sit back and twiddle our thumbs? Al Queda attacked us several times through the years before we had enough and we had a President that was not a wimp. We need a strong leader that will stand up and let them know if you start it with us we will finish it. If you think for one minute that you can make friends with Muslims in other Countries, why don’t you go there and you better pray they don;’t kidnap you for all they can get and then behead you. All of them hate us for the freedom we have , they hate our lifestyles, Homosexuals, women wearing makeup and form fitting clothes. Anything that represents a life of freedom including freedom to have an abortion. That is the main reasons they attack us. Saddam Hussein threatened us too many times and we called his bluff. It is really sad that after all the hate these people have for Americans they want every dollar they can squeeze out of us and then there are people like you that don’t get it. I guess you think the U.S. should have let Hitler kill the rest of the innocent men, women and children. You sound like the type that would walk away if you seen a thug robbing an old lady because it would be none of your business.

  • Kinetic1

    Bryan, Bryan, Bryan,
    Once again, if you want to be a real reporter you’re going to have to act like one (unless your goal is a job with FOX.) The folks on this site might have been interested in the fact that the President was acting on the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S.(CFIUS). Or the fact that Ralls failed to follow U.S. regulations which require review by CFIUS before a purchase of this nature can be conducted.

    “With the lawsuit, Ralls is “making a constitutional argument to be reimbursed for ignoring a statutory review where Congress granted the president the authority to unwind a transaction that threatens national security,” said Ivan Schlager, who heads the CFIUS practice for Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in Washington. “Now Ralls wants the U.S. taxpayer to pay for their decision to go forward? Good luck.”
    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-02/obama-bars-chinese-owned-company-from-building-wind-farm

    I understand that including information like this casts a more flattering light on the President, but sometimes you just have to include the information and print the article anyway.

    • http://www.mthammer.com Mike Clark

      What other reply would you expect from an agency of government covering up for Obama the cheating liar of a President we have ever had in the history of this country . This guy Obama is a racist along with his top cop and believes the taxpaying citizens are all a bunch of dummies , they are and they are democrats , after asking these people questions they don’t even know what Obama Care means . They are the 50% that pay no income tax , all on government programs , then when you ask them how come there are 49% of the public on food stamps . They say well there are 30 million people on welfare if we stop those programs whats going to happen to them , I would tell them you dont work thats your problem , go to some other country and see if they will help you . We cant keep spoiling these people and cant keep condemning businesses like this guy in the WH or democrats in Congress. The American people are pissed and 280 million gun toting taxpayers are pissed off ,I sure wouldn’t want my name out there defending this socialist govt we have right now .

  • auhunter

    Potential security risk? The current administration hasn’t been to worried about viable security risks in the last 4 years, such as Libya, why now. The only reason I can come up with is that this company is not one of his crony corporations, they have a superior product and making money and Obama isn’t getting any of it. Granted they do have the capability to spy on the Naval Station there, however if you think a little about it, why should they. They have already been given the guided tour of our capabilities and are going to be given a hands on demo of how we use them in the near future in the Pacific. What else do they need? About all they’re missing are the launch codes.

  • http://www.mthammer.com Mike Clark

    How can Obama enforce any of these rules or executive orders , or whims of his and Attorney General Holder. Who in the hell does he think he is a dictator
    or King . Iam so tired of this guy and all democrats who are going to vote for this [expletive deleted] . When they ask me to prove the allegations , I bring everything from paperwork , documents that I have on file , Freedom of information paperwork that I have on file . When I show them all the proof they tell me that is a conservative opinion , I tell them these are the facts , records from legal documents filed with the courts. They again insist how can you proove its correct , I said so you want me to capture these people and put hem under interrogation and get the truth and put it on YouTube. They all look at me and laugh , it is down right sickening , I just tell them I cant belive how ignorant and irresponsible that they are, immediately they get on the defense telling me the rich , I just shut them up immediately , if you want to be dumb and vote this [expletive deleted] another 4 years , do it and then talk to me in 6 months while we are bombed by the Iranians with a Nuclear Weapon .

  • http://www.facebook.com/gregory.brooks.509 Gregory Brooks

    This is for all those that like to sprue all that anti-christ crap if you would read the Scriptures you would know that he is going to com from your part of the world euro rejects, you need to show some respect for President Obama, because he is just that President of the United States, and besides if he had’nt spent as he did we would be totally bankrupt Like Romny and all his rich republican buddys wanted in the first place

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.