Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

California Medical Marijuana Dispenser Gets 10 Years From Fed

January 9, 2013 by  

California Medical Marijuana Dispenser Gets 10 Years From Fed

A former California medical marijuana dispensary owner was sentenced to 10 years in Federal prison for operating three facilities in the State where marijuana is legal.

Aaron Sandusky is one of a handful of defendants that have been singled out by Federal authorities for running medical marijuana dispensaries in States where possession of the plant is legal under State law. U.S. District Court Judge Percy Anderson gave him the minimum sentence possible under Federal guidelines.

“In this case, as the defendant was warned, the court’s hands are tied,” Anderson said, “whether you agree with the defendant’s position or not.”

The 42-year-old defendant was convicted in October on charges of conspiring to manufacture and possess marijuana with intent to distribute, conspiring to operate a drug-involved premises and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute it.

In sentencing the man, Anderson wrote that Sandusky “used G3 as a means to replace the vast income he lost from the collapse of his real estate business. Defendant built a veneer of legitimacy around his criminal enterprise using his customers’ good-faith search for pain relief.

“There is absolutely no altruistic component to defendant’s continued and sustained criminality.”

Sandusky’s lawyer Roger Diamond is filing an appeal on Sandusky’s behalf in an attempt to take the case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Aaron was in full compliance with California law, but the federal government says that California law is irrelevant,” said Diamond.

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “California Medical Marijuana Dispenser Gets 10 Years From Fed”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at

  • Harold Olsen

    These idiots who want Marihuana legalized can get all the state laws passed that they want, but as long as it is illegal of the federal level then it is still illegal. If they had any brains or intelligence they would have tried getting it legalized on the federal level first, then each state could pass their own laws, as has been done with alcohol. But, these potheads have smoked too much of the weed to have any brains or intelligence.

    • Vicki

      Harold Olsen says:
      “These idiots who want Marihuana legalized can get all the state laws passed that they want, but as long as it is illegal of the federal level then it is still illegal.”

      For our edification please quote where in the Constitution the Federal Government was given the power to make Marijuana illegal to possess and or use.

      • kkflash

        The Federal government, for quite some time now, has not concerned itself with whether the laws and regulations they promulgate are authorized under our Constitution. You may simply add this case to the myriad of examples of Federal lawmakers and administrators exceeding their constitutional authority in order to deprive the citizenry of their God-given rights, exert unnecessary and inappropriate control over our activities, and coerce our submission to their ever-increasing power through use of force.

      • Star

        Right. I consider him a political prisoner!

    • Robert Smith

      So much for states’ rights, Harold.


      • Les

        The states lost all rights under Lincoln and we continue to get screwed over ever since then. Lincoln’s own words “I destroyed the Republic in order to save the Union”.

    • GRusling

      Before the federal government attempted to regulate alcohol, it first passed and got ratified a constitutional amendment granting them that authority. The same has NOT been done where marijuana is concerned, so the federal government is totally without authority to make any such law…

      • eddie47d

        The big problem with Marijuana it is still labeled as a Substance I Drug which brings the wrath of the law down on it. Pressure should be placed on the Federal Government to reduce it to a Substance III Drug which would make it harder to arrest and prosecute. That would also make it easier to legalize it in more states. That is why I sign dozens of pro Marijuana petitions to get it legalized. Confront your State Senators and Representatives with letters or E-Mails to either reduce the criminality of Marijuana and/or the harsh sentencing that is imposed.

      • Karolyn

        eddie – I sign lots of petitions too, but sometimes I wonder how much good they really do. At least I feel like I’m doing SOMETHING! Have you signed any about cops killing family pets?

      • eddie47d

        Karolyn: A few on the killing of family pets. We had a local cop kill a neighborhood elk (5point) last week . The elk was kind of an tourist attraction or icon and wasn’t bothering anyone. Come to find out the cop didn’t have permission to kill it and on top of that he was a partner in a taxidermy shop. Lots of anger over him and they may suspend or even prosecute him.

      • Karolyn

        It seems like the bad cops are starting to outnumber the good! I hope not! There’s an all-out call to the White House to do something about cops’ response to pets. Will it do any good??? Who knows?

    • auhunter

      As I recall there is something in the Constitution about those powers not specifically delegated to the Federal government shall be delegated to the states.

      • vicki

        The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. – Amendment 10.

      • Bruce

        THERE YOU GO LETTING THE CONSTITUTION GET IN THE WAY OF WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. You must be a conservative, who thinks we should follow the constitution. How radical!!!

    • Dale Patterson

      Harold, obviously you are another one of those turds that worship the federal government believing that it knows best and willing to hand it your personal rights and the rights of the 50 states in order to make things easier for the corporations and Gestapo to shove policy down our throats. Herr Olsen you are a good Nazi and an asset to it’s many causes.

  • Jerry

    The Federal Government needs to stay OUT of State Issues PERIOD

  • TNSue

    Trouble is,’The States’ are not United. Get them to Unite again and watch the federal Government tremble,as it should. The Federal Government is supposed to work FOR the States,not as it is today,against them.

    • Star

      Right. So marijuana is legal in Cal., Ore. & Wash. These states should unite to defend it.

  • GRusling

    Article VI, Section 2: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

    US Law is supreme, only so long as it is made pursuant to the constitution, and since no authority is anywhere granted by that constitution, to the federal government, to regulate INTRASTATE COMMERCE of any commodity or service, the federal government and its courts are wrong to attempt such regulation and California State Authorities should oppose any and all such attempts with whatever force is available to them. That’s constitutional, therefore legal and the federal government can’t change it…

    • vicki

      California hasn’t the guts. And since they hate guns they don’t have any way to enforce their guts if they had any. I am hopeful that Colorado will be able to show a bit more moxie.

  • Cliffystones

    I wonder when Barry “Choom gang” Soetoro will weigh in on this topic?

    • eddie47d

      President Obama has spoken out on this topic at least three times that I know of. The growing sentiment for legalizing marijuana is widening and he has told the State of Colorado that he will not stop dispensaries from selling nor will he send in the Feds to do stop them. I recall that was also said about California so is he playing both sides of the fence to appease various public officials in each state. Each side is pushing to see how far they can take this issue and hopefully more states will legalize.

      • Mikey

        What Obama says and what Obama DOES are two entirely different things!

      • Robert Smith

        Eddie pointed out: “Each side is pushing to see how far they can take this issue and hopefully more states will legalize.”

        There is a history for this. Abortion was legalized in several states before Roe v. Wade made it universal.

        Similar things are going on with same sex marriage.

        Eventually individual freedom will win, but we gotta play wack-a-mole with religious nuts who want us to live by their brutal god’s will instead of the free will given by a loving god.


      • ibcamn

        i think this is Obama’s attack on pot,he’s gonna pick the dispencerys off one by one(using the feds)until there gone!he has four years to do it.he’s using the same tactics to go after other enemies of the Obama regiem(using the IRS)so by auditing them one by one,until they have no money left to fight with(campaign donations),he even went after a guitar company for the wood they used,the owner(republican) doesn’t like Obama!this is how Obama will creep in and bring down anyone how defies him and the progressives,sit back and watch it happen……

      • eddie47d

        IBCAMN: Why would he continue to attack dispensaries when they could be a valuable cash cow in tax revenue? Arresting marijuana users adds massive expenses TOO the Federal and State Budgets through incarcerations and court system. It also can label users as felons which takes away job opportunities for them. Obama is looking for ways to add revenue for his other programs not create more expenses.

      • vicki

        Robert Smith writes:
        “Eventually individual freedom will win, but we gotta play wack-a-mole with religious nuts who want us to live by their brutal god’s will instead of the free will given by a loving god.”

        Individual freedom and free will for everyone but the not yet born. What a sweet and loving god Robert aspires to celebrate.

      • vicki

        eddie47d says:
        “IBCAMN: Why would he continue to attack dispensaries when they could be a valuable cash cow in tax revenue?”

        Cause the payoffs from Drug kingpins is MUCH bigger and doesn’t have to be tracked.

        eddie47d: “Arresting marijuana users adds massive expenses TOO the Federal and State Budgets through incarcerations and court system.”

        Which is why RICO laws were created to allow the government (all levels) to execute civil forfeiture on whatever assets the government wants. And that money doesn’t require the government to burden the court system nor jails.

        eddie47d: “It also can label users as felons which takes away job opportunities for them.”

        And, as a plus for gun grabbers, causes the users that are labeled as felons to loose their 2nd amendment rights.

    • http://N/A CintiCB

      He’ll get involved when it will benefit HIM-adoration, votes to get rid of two term limits, + to get elected to a third term. God help us!!!!!

  • T. Jefferson

    There is no Constitution. You idiots voted to throw it away.

    • momo

      Sad, but true.

    • Karolyn

      Seriously? It doesn’t matter how one votes.

  • roger gunderson

    Nobody in the world has a right to my body except me. I have an inalienable right to consume, smoke, inject anything into’ my body. Our mommy and daddy government has taken that
    away from me.

    • ROGER, Irish-Canadian LIBERTARIAN

      No Individual, Organization or Government can TAKE away your rights.They CAN and Do ABROGATE your rights by Executiove Orders, Laws and Decrees. Your RIGHTS are ABSOLUTE and INHERENT and until people UNDERSTAND that and DO what they should, ACCORDINGLY, your RIGHTs will continue to be abrogated. Get organized people. Time is running out.

  • FreedomFighter

    I know I will be at odds with many conservatives on this site with this issue:

    Make weed legal, like booze, tax the hell out of it, stop putting people in jail. With the tax money generated make war on the hard drugs, educate. Im also thinking treating harddrug addicts as mental medical patients and not putting them in, but in treatment with free drugs.

    Gangs would collapse from lack of income, crime diminish, drug cartels vanish and prisons will be for the violent evil doers and real criminals, like Barry, Fiensten, Ried…

    Laus Deo
    Semper Fi

    • Bill

      I agree with you, Freedom Fighter
      Again, it is all about the money. Somewhere, I read about a wall street brokerage that got their hand slapped for taking drug money from Mexico. Well we know that wall street owns the current administration. So make your own deductions

      Drug use would become like smoking, where it would be socially unaccepable. However, there will be more drug use as long as we have an anti business government that is happy keeping us in recession

      We need economic opportunities to give us self esteem and keep us off drugs

    • WTS/JAY

      FF: Make weed legal, like booze, tax the hell out of it…

      First of all, Marijuana isn’t anything like booze. Unlike booze, Marijuana grows naturally, is completely harmless(if not abused), and is packed with medicinal efficacy; as well, packed with nutritional goodness, not to mention the industrial prosperity and that it would solve all our energy needs; a gift from God, some might say. It behoves me to understand why some, who claim to be Christians, would consider such a gift “Evil”! As well, crying and insisting that the “Weed” be decriminalized and that it be exorbitantly taxed, plays right into the hands of big-Pharma, who have, to date, acquired numerous patents to manufacture cannabis-based pharmaceuticals; hence, the reason behind the heated-debate!

      • John

        Leagalize Marijuana there are no facts that prove it is dangerous to humans, animals, and our environment. To shortly sum this up, the full leagalization of cannabis to use and to cultivate and to get the tax regs. right it would take care of CA financial problems and quickly.

        • Bruce

          why do people BEG for a tax on pot?
          How about we beg for….all laws concerning pot to be removed from the law books.
          ALL LAWS concerning pot.
          NO NEW TAXES.
          Lets make the government run on 10% just like God demands we give 10% to him?
          If God can do it on 10% then government run by the liberals should be able to do BETTER THAN GOD DOES, and do it for less than 10% of total income.
          If God can do it for 10% and our government wants to do it for 44% then i would much rather have God governing me for his 10%.
          What a DEAL that 10% would be compared to what we slaves pay now?
          THINK or a liberal will do it for you, and call it feeling.

    • Karolyn

      Absolutely right FF! This is one area we totally agree on. I remember reading somewhere of a drug dealer being interviewed and saying that he does not want drugs legalized because he would go out of business. This is insane!!

  • Cory Christofferson

    Everything in this country is about money. The whole medical field is a racket.Thousands die every year from doctor prescribed drugs and not one in recorded history has ever died from smoking weed yet the insane stupidity continues as the ignorant sheep follow along.

    • Grumpykevin

      There you again Bruce! making Sense

  • Bruce

    soon the federal government will become as important as the Former Soviet Union is now. Bankruptcy just around the corner. What was it we needed the Federal Gov for? how are they doing with that? and what is that costing us? Maybe it would be better to be 50 countries than 50 states that have no say in their own future. Rome fell. Our turn is coming. Got “landing gear”?

  • Average Joe

    Historical Outline

    1st: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress. Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

    2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”, Trademark name, “United States Government”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia. (link to pdf image file of the full 1871 Act)

    3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution’s 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

    4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

    5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”. Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system—again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

    6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments. You must also note that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

    7th: Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation’s Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this amendment. According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

    8th: Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national Senator.

    9th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

    10th: In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers. It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation. Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was returned to him.
    (See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well. Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)

    11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S.

    12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number). They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification. On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust. More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.

    13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.

    14th: In 1962, considering the states were forced to carry out their business dealings in terms of Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, out of the necessity the states began protecting themselves from the people by forming corporations like Corp. U.S. Accordingly, those newly formed corporate state administrations began adopting Corp. U.S. suggested uniform codes and licensing structures that allowed better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

    15th: By 1972, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

    Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share your discovery with us.

    When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.

    The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.

    Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them. It is far more important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government and spread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. In fact it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right. The process is a simple one. The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That’s why we ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery.

    That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF ‘X’ as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Bigfoot Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.

    It’s time to wake up and follow the truth, time to repent and become a moral and honorable society instead of lauding our Piety while we stand guilty of:
    a) not knowing the truth;
    b) not living the truth;
    c) believing God will save us even though we have the tools to know the truth the ability to use the tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the tools we have to save ourselves and thereby become free.

    The biggest problem with that get all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S. is that they are blind to the truth having no remedy so they bail out of “the system” hell bent for a rebellion even the scripture says cannot be won with conventional weapons of war. Would that we could instead follow the admonition of the King of Kings and unite with truth to legally, lawfully and peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government thereby taking back the control our nation in accord with law.

    For a better understanding and a wealth of more info, please visit:


    • TIME

      Dear AJ,


      Peace and Love, Shalom

  • Karolyn

    I saw a headline on FB the other day about a guy who gopt 55 yrs.!!!! for selling a small amt. of pot. i’m sure it wasn’t his first offense, but, come on, give me a break!!! Well, I guess it’s just more money for the private prison concerns that we are paying.

    • ibcamn

      yes Karolyn it’s true that someone can get sentenced to a rediculas amount of time for selling pot!our prisons are full(large %) with drug related convicts!depends on amount of times your caught selling or committing a crime though!you can commit murder and get less time!jail time is no longer a deturrant and the money is too much of a draw for them to stop,we will see more of and more of it as the economy takes a dump!war on drugs is a great tool and platform for politicians so they will proceed as is,to them(gov’t) this is profitable and the draw is too much for them to stop!

  • Karolyn

    Now, this guy could be a shyster, but if he complied with state law, it shouldn’t matter who it is.


    As DEA raids and IRS harassment continue on state-approved medical marijuana, Big Pharma eyes the profitability of cannabis and prepares to muscle in, using its lobbyists and government connections to ensure a monopoly on legal sales of the drug.

    In early April of 2011, two drug manufacturing giants, G.W. Pharmaceuticals and Novartis, announced they had formed an alliance to license and market GW’s Sativex, a liquid cannabis drug. The drug is already available in Great Britain, as well as Canada and Spain. The licensing agreement with Novartis will enable sales to expand into markets in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. FDA Phase III trials are still being organized for Otsuka, GW’s partner for licensing Sativex for the US market.

    Unlike other cannaboids produced for recreational or medicinal use, Sativex is not a synthetic but an actual extract of the cannabis plant. It therefore lacks the side-effects of the synthetic drugs which merely attempt to replicate cannabis. Patients, primarily people diagnosed with MS or cancer, spray Sativex beneath their tongues…

    Learn more:

  • Robert E. Speciale

    look at the history of marijuana prohibition;you see prejudice and greed ; ignorance,confusion and lies.violations of constitutional rights,violations of personal freedoms, waste of pubic monies. statutes should be in accord with the constitution and should be for the pubic good. ah, but there’s the rub. it,s hard to find an entitlement ,(right) that has not been abridged from the dream of free America. study and remember our story,(history). learn the meanings of the words when they were written and take notice of changes to the meanings. write,speak,and represent our freedoms,(entitlements).

  • axzz2Ns9L9fur

    It is appropriate time to make some plans for
    the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I
    desire to suggest you few interesting things or tips.
    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read more things about it!


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.