Big Cases On The Docket Early In Supreme Court’s Approaching Term

0 Shares
United States Supreme Court Entrance

Last week, the Supreme Court announced its calendar of cases for the first two months of its next annual term beginning on the first Monday of October. Usually, the Court hears about 80 cases in a given year. Of the 45 the Justices have already selected for the coming year, there are a handful of standouts.

On Oct. 8, the court is scheduled to hear arguments in McCutcheon v. FEC. The case is a follow-up to the landmark Citizens United ruling and will address the Constitutionality of biennial limits on certain campaign contributions.

Next, on Oct. 15, the court will shift its focus to race in the United States. In the case Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, the Justices will decide whether a State violates the Equal Protection Clause by amending its Constitution to prohibit race- and sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment.

Via SCOTUSblog:

… Schuette presents affirmative action issues in an entirely different context. The case involves a challenge to Proposal 2, an amendment to the Michigan Constitution, approved by voters in 2006, that banned affirmative action in the state. The statewide ban was challenged by a coalition of groups and individuals who support the continued use of affirmative action in Michigan. Other lawsuits were filed as well, but a federal district court largely upheld the ban enacted by the voters.

On Nov. 5, the court will hear arguments in Bond v. The United States, a case with colorful origins that ultimately questions whether there are limits to Congress’s power to implement treaties.

SCOTUSblog outlines the case as follows:

After Carol Anne Bond’s husband had an affair, Mrs. Bond sought revenge by sprinkling toxic chemicals around the car and mailbox owned by the woman involved.  Prosecutors charged her with violating a federal statute implementing the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (also known as the “Chemical Weapons Convention”), to which the United States is a signatory.  Mrs. Bond argued that Congress lacked the authority to criminalize her conduct, asserting that the statute is a “massive and unjustifiable expansion of federal law enforcement into state-regulated domain.”

The next day, the court is scheduled to delve into a major religious liberties case, Town of Greece v. Galloway, assessing whether prayers offered at legislative sessions violate the Constitution’s Establishment Clause.

This will mark the first time that the Supreme has taken up a government prayer case in three decades.

 

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • steve

    as to the last case, religion is going down for the count. the government will destroy all religion rev 17& 18 babylon the great will fall. just look at what was recently implemented in the armed services. if you are a chaplain and you bring the bible into the building that is used for prayers and services you will be court martial and sent to prison. just the beginning . stay tuned for more results.

    • Chester

      Verify that statement. as runs totally opposite what I have seen and heard elsewhere. Actually, even goes against UCMJ.

      • steve

        i believe i read it either on this web site or it was on glenn beck’s site. can’t remember.but i read this within the last 2 months.

      • steve

        i believe i read it either on this web site or it was on glenn beck’s site. can’t remember.but i read this within the last 2 months.

  • steve

    as to the last case, religion is going down for the count. the government will destroy all religion rev 17& 18 babylon the great will fall. just look at what was recently implemented in the armed services. if you are a chaplain and you bring the bible into the building that is used for prayers and services you will be court martial and sent to prison. just the beginning . stay tuned for more results.

  • 10-Nov-1775

    Call it what you will, but “affirmative action” is really “Reverse Discrimination”.