Bid For Gay-Marriage Ballot Measure Rejected By Supreme Court


Bid for gay-marriage ballot measure rejected by Supreme CourtOn Jan. 18, the nation's highest court turned down a challenge spearheaded by Bishop Harry Jackson, who requested a measure to be placed on Washington, D.C., ballots that would allow residents to vote on the definition of marriage. According to The Associated Press, the Supreme Court did not comment on its decision.

The lawsuit worked its way up to the high court after D.C.'s Board of Elections ruled that a ballot question regarding the requirements for marriage would authorize discrimination. In 2010, the district began issuing marriage licenses for gay couples, and in 2009 it began recognizing same-sex marriages that had been performed elsewhere.

Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, Iowa and the District of Columbia allow gay marriages, while New York, New Jersey, Maryland and Rhode Island recognize marriages performed in other jurisdictions.

However, lawmakers are pushing to legalize gay marriage in the Empire State, according to the New York Daily News. State Senator Thomas Duane (D-Manhattan) said that he will introduce legislation to legalize the practice "within weeks," and he will push for a vote by the end of June.

A similar bill was introduced and soundly defeated by the State Senate in 2009, but proponents of equal rights are optimistic that newly-elected Governor Andrew Cuomo, who called for legalization of gay marriage in his State of the State address earlier this month, will help pass the landmark legislation. 

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.