Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Barack Obama: The First Gay President?

May 15, 2012 by  

Barack Obama: The First Gay President?
THEDAILYBEAST.COM
Newsweek proclaimed Barack Obama "The First Gay President."

A Newsweek cover may herald more truth than the magazine knows. The cover touts President Barack Obama as “The First Gay President,” complete with a rainbow halo.

The cover story’s author, Andrew Sullivan, is openly gay. The title, no doubt, is meant as an attention-getter and is not overly surprising following TIME’S recent cover photo.

Sullivan (and Newsweek, for that matter) is likely unaware of Obama’s gay past, which the mainstream media have attempted to keep locked in the closet.

In 2010, investigative reporter Wayne Madsen wrote an article on his subscription-only site, the Wayne Madsen Report (WMR) which unveiled his discovery that Obama frequented a raunchy Chicago gay club, Man’s Country. The report also claims that then-Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel is also a member. You didn’t see that on CNN, did you?

Madsen is not some lunatic blogging over a bowl of Lucky Charms; he is a highly touted journalist and former U.S. Naval Officer. Reportedly, sources close to Man’s Country told WMR that Obama and Emmanuel are on file as members. Man’s Country goes to great extremes to maintain privacy and confidentiality due to the nature of the club. It is believed that the U.S. Secret Service has destroyed any evidence of the two men being on the club’s files. Allegedly, Obama and Emmanuel have ID cards which are required for admission into the club’s facilities. Sources within Chicago’s gay community report Obama would frequent the club on Wednesdays.

Furthermore, sources told WMR that Obama went to Man’s Country because he enjoyed receiving sexual favors from white men. This would lend credence to Larry Sinclair’s claims in 2008 that he and Obama had engaged in sexual acts on two occasions. Shortly after making the allegations, a warrant for Sinclair’s arrest was issued by Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden. Beau Biden is Vice President Joe Biden’s son.

Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign reportedly discovered information that would add credibility to WMR’s findings. “During the 2008 election, I campaigned for Hillary Clinton in the Democrat primaries. Repeatedly, I heard over and over here in Chicago that Barack Obama is gay and that his marriage to Michelle is one of mutual convenience,” wrote Kevin DuJan. Photos reveal that Obama has been wearing a wedding ring long before he was married. Why might that be?

The marriage between Barack Obama and Michelle LaVaughn Robinson was performed by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Reportedly, Wright ran the Down Low Club, commonly referred to as DLC, in Chicago. Sources in Chicago’s gay community report that Wright and the club functioned as a matchmaker for gay black men. Allegedly, the DLC’s purpose was to keep gay black men from frequenting bars or posting ads online.

Reportedly, Obama and Trinity United Church of Christ choir director Donald Young were among the members of DLC. Two other gay black men were members of DLC and TUCC: Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. Mysteriously, all three died in late 2007 as Obama campaigned for the Presidency. Where was MSNBC for that story?

Rumors have swirled that Reggie Love, Obama’s friend and personal trainer, has been involved in a homosexual relationship with Obama. Obama referred to Love as his “body man” and frequently had 15-minute personal training appointments. Love announced in 2011 he would be stepping down from the position. WMR reported that, at the same time, evidence surfaced which suggested Love was involved in gay sex parties at Duke University and the University of North Carolina.

There has also been suspicion that Obama and Kal Penn, a gay actor who was appointed associate director of the White House Office of Public Engagement, had a sexual relationship. Penn left in April 2010 and was robbed at gunpoint shortly thereafter. His two government-issued cellphones were stolen. Some have speculated that the Obama regime stole the phones in order to cover up evidence of the alleged gay relationship.

Sources have also come forward and accused Obama of having homosexual relationships with politicians Artur Davis, Deval Patrick and Bill Frist.

“They know how to quash a story,” said James Manning, a Harlem pastor who has vocally disproved of Obama since his election, referring to Obama and the mainstream media. Manning claims he has evidence that will undeniably prove that Obama has a homosexual past, but that it must be released at the right time. He believes he must wait for the proper time, or the evidence will be destroyed. Manning has said that, in Chicago, Obama’s gay past is public knowledge among the gay community.

Rush Limbaugh has posed a worthwhile question: “Where are Obama’s former girlfriends?” One would think that women would come forward and provide evidence of a past relationship with the President, but so far no woman has.

Perhaps a Newsweek title is completely true for a change.

Bryan Nash

Staff writer Bryan Nash has devoted much of his life to searching for the truth behind the lies that the masses never question. He is currently pursuing a Master's of Divinity and is the author of The Messiah's Misfits, Things Unseen and The Backpack Guide to Surviving the University. He has also been a regular contributor to the magazine Biblical Insights.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Barack Obama: The First Gay President?”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Michael J.

    One man, many titles…
    First gay President (with hands-on experience)
    Spokesperson of the Chicago Mobster Industrial Complex
    Chief apologist to the Muslim World
    Rothschild Sock Puppet
    U.N. Secretary General Wannabe
    Official Counsel to the Monsanto/ Big Pharma Depopulation Project
    MSM’s reason for being (inspiration for the tingle down the leg theory)

    • Robert Smith

      “Vanity Fair magazine published a six-page excerpt Wednesday (May 2), which focuses on two of Obama’s former girlfriends, Alex McNear, whom Obama met at Occidental College before transferring to Columbia, and Genevieve Cook, the daughter of a prominent Australian diplomat. ”

      There, that answer’s Rush’s question.

      From: http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2012/05/president-barack-obamas-ex-girlfriend-genevieve-cooks-journal-featured-in-new-biography.html

      Rob

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        reading your comment reminded me of the articles written about Rock Hudson’s girffriends back in the day when he was a hot hunky star – image is everything isn’t it.. :) Articles and timing are essential.

      • Robert Smith

        Yes, the girlfriends were from 25 years ago when he was thinking about some right winger calling him gay in 2012.

        The whole thing is even more lame than the Birthers.

        Rob

      • Michael J.

        Robert Smith,
        I guess you are unaware of the blue suit jacket with the ominously stained lapel, purchased by Michael Jackson shortly before his death. Parallels in perversion or Liberal status quo?

        Had you going for a second there. Don’t worry, Taqqiya is not in the conservative play book. Provactive insinuation is however a homespun remedy for mental constipation. Feel better now?

      • FreedomFighter

        Hey Rob,

        I think Mr Obama is very gay.

        Laus Deo
        Semper Fi

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        I recollect a few gay friends – not out of the closet totally, showing up with girls as their “dates” – to appear “normal” in certain setting of course that was 30-40 years ago — and none of them had any presidential aspirations —- :)

      • Steve E

        So that must mean that Obama is a switch hitter.

      • The Resolute Voice

        So what? Maybe he’s bisexual or maybe these are cover stories too. The point is that there is a LOT about this man that Americans simply don’t know and all of it is strange. You can’t make this stuff up with such detail unless you’re a novelist. To quote Rev Wright in another manner, “The chickens are coming home to roost.” Finally.

      • Michael J.

        Robert Smith,
        To say that he has vanity is fair, an over abundance actually.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMZKNYaIdvs&feature=related

        Check out the scene where a herd a sheep adorned with Obama signs are set to march over a cliff.

      • http://PersonalLiberty Alondra

        Robert, the truth is that your “president” is
        FIRST “BLACK” (in spite of being mulatto – WHITE NEGRO 50/50 – but he chose to be BLACK – his soul is absolutely BLACK)
        FIRST FRAUDULENT
        FIRST NON-AMERICAN
        FIRST ANTI-AMERICA
        FIRST HIGHLY inexperienced (part-time community organizer and part-time lecturer)
        FIRST ANTI-CHRISTIAN
        FIRST PRO-SATANIC ISLAM
        FIRST GAY (only in the Executive Office of the President there are 40 high-positioned gays, who are in the WH each day http://www.glli.org/presidential He dishonored and disgraced the highest symbol of America – WH – by sodomised orgies. Don’t doubt me.)
        FIRST PRO-INFANTICIDE
        FIRST PRO-DEMORALIZATION of American Military
        FIRST HATER of America,
        FIRST HIGHLY RACIST
        FIRST HIGHLY DIVISIVE (race, class, gender, politics)
        FIRST HIGHLY IMMORAL
        FIRST HIGHLY DISHONEST, IGNORANT, ARROGANT, DECEITFUL
        43% of the WV state’s DEMs voters preferred the federal prisoner over the satan’s CEO! Isn’t revealing, Robert Smith?
        Saol Alinsky’s play-book does not work anymore. Accept it!

    • eddie47d

      How about a more reasonable spin. Since Ministers and church goers regularly condemn homosexuality. It could be possible that the Reverend (Wright) who rails against homos could have had these gay lovers/parishioners killed to exorcise them from the church. There is also a history of religious folks who take the law into their own hands to keep their congregation “pure”. .

      • Nadzieja Batki

        According to your wording you admitted O is a fool.

      • eddie47d

        I think Christians did that to the Jews also Nadzieja if you’d like to poke a little deeper.

        • Deerinwater

          This is going to be a “BIG ISSUE” in church houses all across America in the coming months.

          I fail to see how the “right” can continue make the charge that Obama tells people only what they want to hear. ~ This announcement was a gutsy move and can only hurt his bid for reelection as he stands on principals of equality and fairness.

          The “Right” is going to tear him a new one!

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        Deer, Obama’s stand on same-sex marriage has strengthened my decision to vote for him. Equal right’s is equal right’s. Even when you don’t like the way they are used.

      • http://PersonalLiberty Alondra

        eddie47d, if you’d like to poke a little deeper, you would find that Rev Wright never railed against homos and against abortions. Rev. Wright not a Christian. He preaches a Black Liberation Theology, which is based on the James Cone theology and states that Jesus Christ is black and the Chosen People are blacks. I hope you know that the BIBLICAL Jesus Christ is a White Jew and the Chosen People are Jews.
        DC-based investigative journalist Wayne Madsen discovered that Obama had a membership in a Chicago gay club and that he had “sexual relationships with other men, including named D.C. politicians and Donald Young, the openly-gay choir-director of the church in Chicago of which Obama was a member for some 20 years — Jeremy Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ black liberation theology. Obama’s relationship with Young was confirmed by Larry Sinclair, who claims to have had two sex-cocaine trysts with Obama.”
        http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-gay-past-being-hidden-by-killing.html

        And eddie47d, “if you’d like to poke a little deeper you would find that “religious folks who take the law into their own hands to keep their congregation ‘pure’” were pervert Christians who followed Popes’ theology, not BIBLICAL.

        eddie47d, “poke a little deeper” and do not expose your absolute twisted ignorance.

      • Lucinda

        Islam is particularly hard on homosexuals.

    • vanessa

      Micheals got it right Obummer was “put” into this office to do all the dirty work of finishing this country off. He ran past Hillary, with the help of the black panthers and acorn, voter fraud, because everytime he did something that riled the people they could play the race card which works better than the female card. Now with George Soros money and backing he only needs one more term to completely destroy this country and turn it into a socialist communist whatever. We will look more like Cuba than anything else. Just think where can we “raft” to for a better life? Canada maybe. This country has been THE beacon for years Cubans risking their life to get here Immagrints pouring in through Ellis Island all looking for a place to better themselves. Obummer is killing the American dream faster than Bush. Both of them worked for the big banks only Obummer hides his relationship while George let it all hang out.

    • Rich

      Don’t forget, also First A**H*** president!!!!!!!

  • Sirian

    This is nothing more than a political maneuver that has been used to embellish his support from the gay community/base. It will be played with several times in several different ways before November.

    • Raggs

      Well don’t you just see it as a LITTLE ODD that the only people left in this country that are willing to vote for this faggot are bottom feeder’s… oblama is scraping the bottom of the barrel to find anyone that will vote for him… It seems to be DESPERATION because he knows damm good and well that NOBODY with half a brain will vote for his sorry ass.

      • JON

        Your use of the “faggot” just show you have no self respect or respect of others. People who use words like that have a huge flaw in themselves and feel the need lash out to mask their own inadequacies. Grow up or shut up!

      • Doc Sarvis

        Jon,
        I’ve not seen any willingness on Raggs’ part to evolve or mature.

      • Michael J.

        Doc Sarvis,
        Tolerance and sensitivity to Homosexuality is not about evolution or maturity, it is instead about just saying NO to the mandates of Political Correctness / Cultural Marxism and the devious tactics of Critical Theory.

      • Capitalist at Birth

        To Jon and Doc: Have you never heard of the term Commie Pinko Fag? The goal of Communism/Fascism are one and the same, to destroy traditional morality and organized religion. Part of traditional morality is NOT sexual promiscuity or deviance. To promote abnormal sexual behavior is immoral. Now do you get it? You are both, probably either homo sexual or pedophiles. One in the same in my book.

      • Doc Sarvis

        Capitalist at Birth,
        I didn’t realize it was so easy to get you all frothy.
        As for being a homosexual or a pedophile (or communist for that matter) – I’m not any of those.

      • Karolyn

        Conservative – Glad I don’t have or read YOUR book!

      • Doc Sarvis

        Michael J.
        It is about saying yes to humanity.
        Your argument is the age old case for exclusion used against women and racial minorities to various extents historically and to some extent still today.

      • Steve E

        Jon, your insistence for everyone to use political correctness shows your mental flaws. Political correctness is a mental disorder. I don’t believe in political correctness. It is for the weak minded. I just tell it like it is and don’t give a damn about hurting someone’s feelings. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

      • eddie47d

        Yet some of you get mad if others reject your Christian God. Isn’t that political and religious correctness Steve?

      • Steve E

        Eddie, I suppose that if someone gets mad because someone else rejects their Christian God would be a mental disorder also. First of all, why would they get offended? There is no logical reason to get offended. I know I sure don’t.

      • Opal the Gem

        Toss another faggot on the fire.

      • Deerinwater

        “Political correctness is a mental disorder.”

        No it isn’t,~ according students at Texas Tech, it’s the process of attempting to pick up a turd by the clean end.

        While I’m not sure why anyone would want to do that, it does present certain challenges.

      • 4LoveOfGod&Country

        @JON: do you prefer “queer” which was the term before “gay” was word-napped.

      • 4LoveOfGod&Country

        @eddie47d:No, just sad if you reject our Jesus; every will bow & every tongue confess that He is LORD.

      • eddie47d

        Then Steve E does that mean you accept or reject the Republican political correct view that homosexuals are inferior and don’t deserve equal rights on domestic issues.

      • vanessa

        When I was young it would have been perfectly fine to call Obummer a “Commie Pinko Fag” I think of it when I hear him but at last PC has made that a no go. Whatever happened to “sticks and stones……….but words will never hurt you”

    • carrobin

      Only the usual bigots think that there’s anything wrong with being gay. Most of the guys I like best are (and my favorite actor was bi). But I seriously doubt that Obama is.

      • 4LoveOfGod&Country

        Seriously? He’s effeminate as they come. Show me your friends & will know who you are.

      • Tom Cook

        Gave yourself away there liberal. You dullards have a limited vocabulary which you employ as weapons since you are all cowards. Bigot. Man is that a wonderful word.

      • Karolyn

        There’s a difference between effeminate and suave and self-confident. Men wouldn’t know the difference.

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        I agree with you. I don’t think Obama is gay, either. And there is no indication, or proof, that he is.

        The people who want to believe that he is gay, want to believe all the other trash talk about him, too. Without evidence of those, either.

        Basically, they believe because they wish to believe.

      • Butch

        No liberal bigots like yrselves don’t believe that hes a sodomite because you DON’T want to believe, even tho its all been laid out in front of you. you just reject that evidence like you reject how hes destroyed this nation from the inside out.

      • http://PersonalLiberty Alondra

        Carrobin, Yep, we, BIGOTS, not think, but we are absolutely affirmatively sure that there is everything wrong with the choosing to be gay – morally, psychologically, physically, behaviorally, emotionally, and medically – sexually transmitted disease. Homosexualism is repugnantly disgust and despicably degenerated PERVERSION of the human sexual relations.

        God created MAN and WOMAN. Not two men or two women. The sex intended to be between opposite genders by the precisely constructed genitals: penis and vagina. Male’s penis belongs to the female’s vagina and not to the anal hole or mouth, which have absolutely different purpose.

        There is enough evidence that obama had, and we strongly believe that he continue to have homosexual relations, otherwise why in his Executive Office of the President there are 40 gays on the high positions. For the homosexual orgies.

        Proud BIGOT and proud HOMOPHOBE.

        • Deerinwater

          “Homosexualism is repugnantly disgust and despicably degenerated PERVERSION of the human sexual relations”

          There was a time I felt the same way ~ and while I might still harbor some of these feelings, my thoughts have been tempered with the late in coming knowledge that sexual orientation is something that is not a selection one makes on their own but is determined at birth or prior. That mother nature makes this random bad call, 2 to 4% of the time, leaving these 2 to 4% to live with the results like any other physical anomaly.

          We are left with many ways of viewing this anomaly and dealing with it.

          1. The most common way is to ignore and deny it, that people are just behaving badly for we know bad behavior is common, accept it as so and acknowledge it. Bad behavior fits inside our “reality”.

          2. To understand this for what it is, a natural reoccurring anomaly, victims at birth and victims of society that refuse to accept them.

          3. Consider them as they themselves have had to do in order to cope and contend in a dominate heterosexual world “special”, different, cursed with a blessing from God for some purpose they struggle to accept , understand and carry with some dignity and fill them purpose on earth in much the same way the other 96% of people do.

          Like a beautiful woman born with only one leg, she might not be able to do everything a women with two legs can or ever be seen as “normal” but that does not stop her from making the best of what she does have to offer. The charm, wit, grace, to compete with aid of something that serves as a leg, to excel. To marry and have babies. To have the most prettiest leg in the world. To be all that she can be. This is what people that are Gay are faced with everyday as they carry this heavy baggage society places on them.

          “Numbers of gay and lesbian youth suicides:

          The Universal Almanac 1 listed a total of 4,960 completed suicides among US youth aged 15 to 24 years of age in 1993. They quote a National Center for Health Statistics report. 2 The true numbers are probably a lot higher, because many deaths categorized as accidents are really suicides.

          Statistics of gay and lesbian youth are hard to find.

          The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimated 3 that “as many as 30% of completed youth suicides each year” are performed by gays and lesbians. Unfortunately, many information sources have quoted the 30% as if it is an absolute figure. The Department indicates that it is 30% or fewer. If we assume that the 30% figure is valid and that it is constant across the age range of 15 to 24 years, then approximately 1,488 suicides per year are committed by homosexual youth. If we assume that gays comprise 5% of the total number of youth, then the 1,488 suicides represent an excess of 1240 suicides related to their sexual orientation.

          http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_suic.htm

      • Steve E

        carrobin, I bet who are the kind that thinks there is something wrong with owning and carrying a gun.

        • Deerinwater

          That’s quite a leap! Some many “dots” so little time.

  • cawmun cents

    Who cares what his(Obama’s)sexual orientations are?
    He is the grayman.
    He might be this,but he is possibly that.Who gives a rats backside?
    He will be whatever gets him the winning vote.Nothing more.And for an undisclosed fee,(of course to be put toward his campaign for re-election.)he will be whatever you want him to be….isnt that obvious yet?
    So….he is Green-gray,and gay?What mask will he wear next,in his bid for re-election?
    Perhaps he will stun the world and don a conservative mask?
    Or perhaps the true mask will come off and we will discover that he is the Anti-Christ?(sarcastic sinister background music and maniacal laughing…..batteries not included)
    Maybe the 12th Imam?
    The Chameleon…….whatever color you want him to be.
    We cant really call him a flip flopper,because in order to be one of those you have to take a firm stance on an issue.
    Maybe thats what a moderate is?
    Someone who wears stilts and walks both sides of the fence simultaneously.
    Or mayhaps he is a strong radical?
    Farther left than a drifter on a Nascar track?(necessary redneck reference point required)……hmmmm……could be.
    Who knows?
    Hard tellin’ not knowin’……
    Apparently it just isnt meant to be.
    Cheers!
    -CC.

  • BigBadJohn

    LOL Too funny

    You want to know who the first gay president was? Do a search on Jeff Gannon AKA James Guckert….

    http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=39&contentid=2158&page=2

    • Honestly

      This is one of the most ridiculous posts I have seen.

      • Art

        I’m with you. The responses on this site is pure bullsh*t. Some people have way to much time on their hands. The country is falling apart and look what you re arguing about. Crazy.

      • Butch

        Its only ridiculous because you are absolutely CLUELESS about who yr leaders REALLY are. There have been many many gay politicians from BOTH sides of the aisle and Bush jr was implicated among the many who sodomized gay prostitutes brought to the White House, Bohemian Grove and other places from the Boys Town in Nebraska. I know you don’t want to believe it, neither do I but what I want to believe has no bearing on FACTS. Google: the Franklin Coverup; Paul Bonacci; Johnny Gosch; Conspiracy of Silence or John DeCamp.

  • Floridastorm

    Well, Robert Smith, as Bryan Nash stated, his marriage to Michelle is for show only. So, why couldn’t he have girlfriends be for show also. Many gays, especially the ones not out of the closet, practice this. Wow, they actually uncovered two whole girlfriends. Now, if Vanity Fair could just uncover the story on his birth certificate, selective service, social security card, educational records, his trips to Pakistan, his intimate association with radicals, and why he and Michelle lost their law licenses, then maybe we can start giving a damn about his two girlfriends. Some investigative reporting on Vanity Fair’s part.

    • Robert Smith

      Go to: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp

      Through that link you can see copies of the files from Illinois.

      There was absolutely ZERO wrong doing.

      Rob

      • Floridastorm

        Good old Snopes. Run by a husband and wife team who are died in the wool Leftists and Obama supporters. Credible reporting I’m sure. I have read many other reports that state both Obama and Michelle where under investigation and they gave up their licenses to avoid possible prosecution. I don’t know what actually happened and neither do you. Until that time I will remain skeptical.

      • Honestly

        Absurd!!!!!

      • Honestly

        That comment was meant for Robert Smith.

      • JeffH

        Obama Man’s Country down low connections, Gay bath house, Obama Emmanuel Man’s Country members, Wayne Madsen report, Chicago gay community, Pick up basketball games, Donald Young TUCC gay choir master murder, Larry Sinclair
        Obama Man’s Country down low connections, Gay bath house, Obama Emmanuel Man’s Country members, Wayne Madsen report

        On May 25, 2010 we reported.

        The pieces of the puzzle picture that reveal Obama’s long time down low activity and drug use are falling in to place.

        On May 23, 2010 we reported.

        “The Larry Sinclair allegation of a drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1998.

        Donald Young, the gay choir director at TUCC, who was murdered.

        The National Enquirer article from March 17, 2008 that questioned Obama’s sexuality.

        Evidence from the Rezko trial of Stuart Levine, an Obama associate, giving ongoing drug parties for his male friends.

        Actor Kal Penn, purportedly bisexual, being rumored as one of Obama’s boy toys.

        Reports of Obama and Rahm Emmanuel frequenting Man’s Country in Andersonville, a bath house.”

        “President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community
        http://citizenwells.com/2010/05/30/obama-mans-country-down-low-connections-gay-bath-house-obama-emmanuel-mans-country-members-wayne-madsen-report-chicago-gay-community-pick-up-basketball-games-donald-young-tucc-gay-choir-mast/

      • Kate8

        JeffH – How long have we been talking about this stuff?

        You can lead a liberal to the truth but you can’t make him see it.

        BTW, the bodies are still piling up in O’s back yard.

        http://beforeitsnews.com/story/2141/551/Passport_Witness_To_Testify_Against_Obama_Fatally_Shot_Outside_Church.html

      • JeffH

        Kate8 :) Several years now.
        Hope all has been well for you. As you can see, the libs have been coming out of the woodwork.

    • Robert Smith

      The trip to Pakistan was ligitimate.

      Check out: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/passport.asp

      The background records are available.

      Rob

      • Danmo43

        Snopes is in the same bed. Anything about government in Snopes is not credible.

      • Honestly

        I do not believe anything on Snopes that has to do with Obama.

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        Robert, these people do not agree with what snopes has to say, so that means that snopes is not true. Despite the facts, and evidence, that they provide.

      • Butch

        tigeer, you wouldn’t know a fact if it punched you in the face, which is what you desperately need.

    • TIME

      Snopes was funded by the Bilderbuger gang, Need I say more?

      Thus to use ( Snopes ) as a form of gaining intel is akin to reading three day old water soaked dog waste to garner intel about the world at large.

      Peace and Love

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        Snopes is self supporting. Next time try a valid argument.

      • cawmun cents

        In order to read snopes,and believe it you have to have a headful of the stuff you mentioned.Either that or a degree in democratic dogma…..same as it ever was.
        -CC.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      lol So you’ve bought into all the anti-Obama hysteria? Too bad.

      Neither of the Obama’s have lost their law licenses. For any reason. Neither one of them have had any investigations by the state of Illinois, either. Look it up yourself – https://www.iardc.org/lawyersearch.asp Type in the name “Obama” and see what this official site has to say. Don’t rely on the hearsay that you quoted.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      “uncover the story on his birth certificate, selective service, social security card, educational records, his trips to Pakistan, his intimate association with radicals”

      I was unaware that the State of Hawaii dealt in fraudulent documents. Do you have proof of this? Or is this only what you wish to believe?

      Selective service, social security, education records and passport records are not public documents. IOW, you do not have the right to them. When you keep bringing these non-public documents up, as though they matter, you just look ignorant.

      You can, however, get a non-certified copy of his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii on Obama’s 75th birthday. That’s how long Hawaii’s vital records are kept private. Do you people realize that Obama didn’t have to post his birth certificate online in the first place, let alone do it twice (because you were too stupid to know what constitutes a valid birth certificate!)?

      • Ginger

        When any person in the United States wants to run for his party’s nomination to the office of President, he is required to be vetted by his party. He is required to show his party any documentation they ask for to prove his eligibility to run for his party’s nomination.
        HIs “friends in high places” (probably bribed off) FAILED to VET him and created the problem of having an illegal alien sitting in the white house. He has yet to show an official “undoctored” original document of live USA birth. How you can sit there and call all of the research which have been done on this man of no consequence. He has thoroughly brain-washed you and other liberals as well. It is a shame that you can not see what this man really is..

  • Karolyn

    Speaking of Obama’s former girlfriends, one was interviewed only a couple of weeks ago. He and she had lived together during college – and she is white.

    • Floridastorm

      So, Karolyn, what is your point? There are gay guys that live with girls and Lesbians that live with guys. Because you live with the opposite sex means nothing. After all, Obama had two kids with Michelle. Proves nothing about his actual sexual orientation. We shall see if this information does come out before the election. If, in fact, it is found out that Obama is a closet gay, he has even less of a chance for re-election than he does now.

      • Palin16

        Elton John and Pyotr Tchaikovsky were both once married to females.

    • Nobody’s Fool

      Well, jeepers, Karolyn, i guess that makes it all okay, then, doesn’t it!!! You and Rob are so blinded by your slavish adoration for oBlamer that if you found out he was eating horse hockey, you’d declare that it is a delicacy, and order up a big batch for yourself. You are just a sad excuse for womanhood. Really, you admire a homosexual muslim???

      • Karolyn

        I was merely respondin to the allegation that none of his girlfriends had been inevidence. I am no an Obama sycophant. I would even stand up for Romney if somethig was being said that wasn’t true, and I’m no Romney fan – just happen to believe in the truth.

  • Raggs

    The first limp wrist president… Need any of us say more?
    He is the first in a long line of things none of all is good…

    • Doc Sarvis

      The first President to have the guts to go after bin Laden with our strength. I’ll take that courage anyday.

      • Nobody’s Fool

        oBlamer was on the golf course until 20 minutes before the SEALS (NOT oBlamer) took out bin Laden. oBlamer wants you to think he was right there, leading the charge when in fact he couldn’t be bothered to come off the links until just before it went down. YOU, Doc, are so blinded that you wouldn’t know the truth if it slapped you in the face.

      • Raggs

        Doc your really are mislead… name one person that would not have gave the order to pull the trigger?… It never would have happened if Bush didn’t put the troops on the ground.

      • Doc Sarvis

        Raggs,
        Bush had him in his sites but didn’t give the command. I heard that he even gave bin Laden’s family free exit from the U.S. after 9/11. I’ve heard claims that Clinton may have had a chance to get bin Laden prior to 9/11 when he was not as strong a target (as post 9/11).

      • Dennis48e

        doc, I heard obama refused to give the order to take Bin Laden out and Panetta had to give it.

      • Doc Sarvis

        Dennis48e,
        You heard? How’s that for hard information?
        I “heard” that pigs can fly. Sorry, I don’t believe it.

      • June

        Who are you fooling????? The Navy Seals” WENT AFTER BIN LADEN” NOT OBAMA!!!!
        All Obama did was give the ok as president of the United States. And YES,Mitt Romney would have given the ok to get Bin Laden if he were president just as any president would.

        Get a life!!!

      • The Resolute Voice

        I think it was Bush who did that first, despite Obama’s ranting and raving that we shouldn’t. Without Bush’s waterboarding, Obama wouldn’t have had a prayer of finding Bin Laden. And let’s face it – it was our military that did the job, not Obama. He just tried to take all the credit.

      • CJM

        Sure, Doc, it takes real ‘guts’ to go after a dead man. bin ladin died years ago from kidney failure–and has gone down in history for having an annual obituary until your honey in the oval office sent out the Navy Seals! Truth is, obammy NEVER did a thing in regards to bin ladin. Give credit to the Navy Seals and not that trash in the oval office. No one knows who really died in that escapade, but it sure wasn’t bin ladin.

      • Honestly

        Doc Your post said I heard also, so people who live in glass houses should not throw stones….

      • eddie47d

        The Resolute Voice; So does that mean the troops and the generals started the war in Iraq and must take blame for that fiasco or was it Bush/Cheney? Does the commander get the credit or the blame or should it all fall on the troops?

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        Me, too!

      • Dennis48e

        Exactly my point.

      • Dennis48e

        That should have read:

        Exactly my point Honestly, thanks.

    • JON

      I would imagine you wrist is far more limp than his!

      • Raggs

        Why are you attempting to attack me when it is your gay king that admitted his fetish?
        OH Saul Alinsky tatics…..

    • JON

      That sounds more like a description of you!

    • Ted Crawford

      I don’t have enough information to be comfortable calling Obama gay, but even if he is, he isn’t the first! The first I’m aware of was our 15th. President, James Buchanan.

      • THG 1956

        I don’t know if it’s true or not , but it’s also rumored that one of obamas favorite presidents (other than himself) was gay also. I’m talking about Lincoln , I’m sure I’m not the only one that’s read this.

  • http://SouthernGirl Doubtful Avenger

    So an article in WaPo today calls him the first woman president. If that is also true, is he a lesbian? I am getting very confused.

    • JON

      He’s a male lesbian. He only likes woman.

  • Doc Sarvis

    This is absurd!
    Mr. Nash’s very unhealthy interest in someone elses’s dreamed up sex life leads us to question his own.
    What business is this (these fabricated rumors) of ours anyway.

    • Floridastorm

      Well, I assume he’s a reporter and is reporting on Obama coming out for the gay community. A reporter is supposed to investigate, is he not? But, let’s face it, the mainstream news media is in the tank for Obama and has been from day one. They haven’t and wouldn’t report one negative thing about this guy if their lives depended on it. Reminds me of Pravda and Izvestia, two other bastions of free press that print propaganda only.

      • Dave

        “They haven’t and wouldn’t report one negative thing about this guy if their lives depended on it.”
        It does, they just don’t realize it!

    • jopa

      Many people over the years have proclaimed Ronald Reagan as the first truly out of the closet gay President.I don’t see it much but others have said they can tell by his hand gestures and the way he acted around persons of the same sex.Perhaps it’s one of those Hollywood influences over the years in that they do act in some circumstances a little different than some consider the norm.So Reagan was gay, no big deal he was still a good man.Many on this site have apparently picked a non electable candidate for their choice as President and are now slinging any type of mud they can at the leadindng contenders out of spite.Time to be nice and face reality and remember we all have to work with our leaders to keep America #1.

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        The group he hung out with would have disagreed with you, but they knew him, you didn’t. You just like to create gossip from the little little mind. You used to actually have something to say. Whatever happened. The dementia getting worse now?

      • Rebecca

        Maybe you have Reagan confused with his openly gay son, Ron, Jr. who was a ballet dancer. Don’t make up things about dead men who aren’t hear to defend themselves.

      • Dave

        “…work with our leaders …” This would be a great idea if we HAD ANY leaders. What we have is a lot of PUSHERS! There hasn’t been ANYONE to vote FOR POTUS…..only those to vote AGAINST! The house and senate are no better.

    • Nobody’s Fool

      Ridiculous because we thinking people disagree with you, Rob, and Karolyn? Why do you continue to read these posts, then, Doc? Don’t you have some babies to abort somewhere??

      • Doc Sarvis

        I read these posts because I am a concerned American who loves his country, I value personal liberty, and I am an Independent.
        I post here because I value truth and too often find there is not enough of that presented here.
        I also value free speech, perhaps you’ve heard of it.

      • Raggs

        Doc gets his wisdom from Saul Alinsky rules for radicals

      • nc

        Nobody, do you post here to try to make people see the truth of your position or just to see your name in print? If it is the former why do others not have that same right to post their opinions? Yet you invite them to LEAVE. Can’t stand the pessure????

    • Nadzieja Batki

      You have made it important because of your running comments.

    • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

      doc, did you complain to Newsweek as well?

      • Doc Sarvis

        I have not yet read Newsweek’s article.

    • CJM

      Doc: When an elected official LIES to the constituents, it becomes our business. Had the imbecile told the truth in the first place, the public may be more forgiving—even if they don’t agree with his lifestyle. Bottom line is this: You cannot trust a LIAR.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Very good questions. As far as I’m concerned this article is politically based in nature, and has nothing to do with facts. It’s a made up hit piece.

  • Zed

    Actually, Obama would be our second or third gay president.

    James Buchanan never married and lived with William Rufus King for 15 years. King was known in Washington circles as “Aunt Nancy” or “Miss Fancy.”

    Abraham Lincoln has long been suspected to be gay. Recently discovered letters from soldiers detailed to protect him indicate that he preferred to sleep with the captain in charge of his protection when his wife wasn’t around.
    Now that COULD mean he just didn’t like sleeping alone, but it could also mean something else.

    • CJM

      Zed: There was a documentary that brought out your claim against Lincoln not so long ago—and it was established he was NOT a homosexual person. As for Buchanan, do you have proof of that as well? Quite frankly, I don’t believe that Buchanan was homo either. Just because times are different today doesn’t mean that one can apply how we define society of today to what was a century ago.

      • Zed

        Your point is well taken. At that time in our history there weren’t distictions between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Better to say that these were sexual men who may – or may not – have taken pleasure in whatever might have tickled their fancy.

  • http://gillysrooms.blogspot.com GILLYSROOMS from Australia

    who writes this rubbish. who cares and how does it enhance the case of the Republican policy or Liberterian ideals? your wasting precious time on trivial matters of no importance. As we say in Australia…ONLY IN AMERICA

    • JON

      I totally agree with you! I’m an American living in Canada. America is not the be all and end all of countries. It has only 4% of the population.There are other great places on this planet. Like Australia! :-)

      • Floridastorm

        Yes, Jon, I agree. But Australia has a great president. We have Howdy Doody.

      • Nadzieja Batki

        America is the best country in the world no matter what you say.

      • Deerinwater

        I loved Australia, it’s much bigger the Texas more diverse then Texas and the people 2nd to none in the world when it comes to being genuine and friendly.

        In Texas, we got a little bit of everything and a lot of some.

      • Karolyn

        A lot of spiritual seekers in Australia and New Zealand.

      • Deerinwater

        After mother receives her final reward and my duty is done and still got my health, I plan to return to Australia. Later then planed but better then never.

  • Karolyn

    I just had to pos this. Some conservative people are just out of their minds! (Note the similarity to an Islamic cleric’s claims of awhile back.)
    Bananas & Cucumbers Deemed Too Sexual in Tennessee Town
    http://www.freewoodpost.com/2012/03/07/bananas-and-cucumbers-deemed-too-sexual-and-will-soon-be-banned-from-some-shelves-in-tennessee/

    • Deerinwater

      Hmm? Is this just an part of the ongoing war on women or a new war on vegetables?

    • Deerinwater

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they do the same thing in your state Karolyn.

      South Carline, Tennessee and Mississippi share a lot of repressed emotions when they thought it was okay to court their sisters. They haven’t out lived it or got over it yet.

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        Odd, they only person I knew that did that was from New York….

      • Karolyn

        Did you see where Govrnor Perdue of NC equated her state with Mississippi because of the vote against same-sex marriage? Apparently, she hasn’t apologized either.

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        she’s a one term governor because she realized she did say and do some silly things and no one would vote for her again… :) no courage left in her corset to run again.

      • Karolyn

        One thing about her, though, liberty, is that she kept contact with the people. I had emailed her about an animal shelter problem over the border in Wadesboro and was on her email list, to which she sent weekly emails regarding the state of the state of NC. It was pretty impressive, outlining all the goog things going on in NC. Our lovely governor Haley wouldn’t deign to do something as connected as that!

    • 4LoveOfGod&Country

      @Karolyn; Perhaps, but liberalism is a mental illness; no sanity there at all, no exceptions.

  • Deerinwater

    29 posting and not a single person has mentioned the significance of what has take place. Just to busy bashing and defending.

    1. If Mitt Romney or Ron Raul could use divine help , something money couldn’t buy, this is it.

    2. This could be the game changer.

    3 GOP and Tea Party people should be singing in the street!

    4. Why are they not ?

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      IMO, the reason this is not a game changer is because it doesn’t really matter. The President has no say in whether same-sex marriage is acknowledged or not. So far, it’s been a States Right’s issue. When it gets to the Supreme Court, it will become a Federal Issue. Once they have ruled on Constitutional grounds (whether you agree with that ruling or not) the States will have no choice but to fall in line.

  • Capitalist at Birth

    Deerinwater, What is your point? Nothing I bet. Just rambling nonsense. To all who doubt any of the dark clouds over Obama’s past, FRO. You are all dunces, and are required to sit in the corner until Thanksgiving.

  • Tom Cook

    obongo is queer as a three dollar bill. Rev. James David Manning has openly revealed this and one of the men obongo has been bending over for, Larry Sinclair, is coming out with a revealing message for all of the black Americans, who are not thrilled with butt humpers, who mindlessly support obongo. There is nothing about obongo that is not wrong. Whomever serviced the big ugly that obongo lives with may have also fathered little queer pedophile Michael Jackson’s kids.

    • http://aol Liz

      You are a total moron, Tom Cook, Michelle is beautiful and caring. Michaels Jackson’s children were his own. Thier mother was white. Gentics has dominant and recessive genes. Don’t you remember 7th grade science?

  • Deerinwater

    Thanks for your personal insult CaB. ~ at least you are consistently, nasty and foolish ~ that a virtue of sorts.

    It seems you are still living in you own little world and oblivious to how this shapes current events and other peoples attitudes besides your own.

    It’s not Obama’s past that’s at issue here but how his open stance on same sex marriage will effect November’s vote.

    But, ~ feel free to kick a dead horse all you want too, I don’t mind.

  • wt

    Romney wil be first bully President. Coward who enjoys picking on the weak, but like all cowards is not man enough to admit a mistake. “I don’t remember doing that..” he says. Sure you do, liar.

    Gays vs wimps. People like Romeny are “wimps” never served in military but big talker. To wit, same for Rush and Hannity and Cheney and others on the right…big talkers but no courage of convictions.

    Quite frankly, I rather be fighting an enemy with a mean gay person than a coward Romney or Limbaugh.

    • Deerinwater

      “That Washington looked the other way with same-sex couples is most obvious in his dealings with Maj. Gen. Frederich Wilhelm von Steuben, the Prussian military genius he enlisted to help him strategize at Valley Forge. Von Steuben arrived at the encampment two weeks before Enslin’s discharge and arrived with his young French assistant, Pierre Etienne Duponceau, who was presumed to be his lover, in tow, making Enslin’s subsequent discharge ironic and reinforcing the theory that it was Burr, not Washington, who compelled the action.

      Von Steuben is perhaps the best-known gay man in American military history. Although his sexual orientation is rarely mentioned and has been excised from standard history books, his role in winning the Revolutionary War was incomparable and second only to Washington’s own. As inspector general and Major General of the Continental Army, his job was to teach drills, tactics and maneuvers. He authored the “Revolutionary War Drill Manual” which was used through the War of 1812 and his other maneuvers were used for more than 150 years.

      Von Steuben also came to Valley Forge as a known homosexual: It was Benjamin Franklin who provided the letters of recommendation to Washington, but Franklin was aware that von Steuben had been implicated in relationships with boys and young men and had been expelled from the court of Frederick the Great for homosexual behavior and was on the verge of being prosecuted when he left Germany for France.

      Von Steuben’s relationship with Washington was close and there were no conflicts with Washington over von Steuben’s sleeping arrangements at Valley Forge with his young Frenchman, Duponceau. What’s more, because von Steuben’s English was limited, but his French was perfect, Washington assigned his own secretary and one of his aides-de-camp to von Steuben.”

      read more; http://www.gaypeopleschronicle.com/stories11/october/1021119.htm

      • CJM

        First of all, homosexual/lesbian/transgenders are NOT ‘gay,’ they are what they are: Homosexual, lesbians, transgenders who take pride only in their sexual preferences. Secondly, just because there is some written history regarding sleeping arrangements in a society of 100 – 200 years ago does NOT mean those individuals were somehow connected to the ‘gay’ community of today and their bastardizations of the English language. Yes, we can say that Plato was at least bi-sexual because HE said he was; that is a far cry from placing modern definitions onto an ancient culture. The modern homo/lesbo crowd needs stop the practice of superimposing their ideals onto the past because this is rewriting history to suit the prurient interests of a few neocons of today.

    • Dennis48e

      “People like Romeny are “wimps” never served in military but big talker.”

      Perfect description of obama as well.

      • jopa

        I believe Obama was about six or seven when Nam was going on and Romney was about 18 when he dodged the draft and ran off to France for eight years to live in a castle.I think the seven year old would have been a better choice for backup if needed.I think when the ‘Elitist” Romney cut the gay kids hair that says a lot about his gangbang mentality about picking on the weak and the poor.After “Doggiegate” and the scissor incident I will have to refer to him as “Muttley Scissorhands”.

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        As Jopa pointed out, Obama was a child during Vietnam. Romney was not.

      • Dennis48e

        Obama’s age during Viet Nam doen not matter. The statement was Romney did not serve in the military I mearly pointed out obama has not served in the military either. So, if Romney is shouldn’t be president because he did not serve obama shouldn’t be president either for the same reason.

      • Dave

        Slick Willie didn’t serve either, he was too busy not inhaling in England. Serving in the millitary is not a prerequisit to be POTUS: being a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is.

  • wt

    Talking sex misconduct. Catholics are know as child predators. Their cover up went all the way to the Vatican, the Pope, while the right wing Christians overlooked such evil transgressions, as usual.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Drop this crap. Every group has sexual predators in it. There are no exceptions. That includes Libertarians. And the percentage of sexual predators is about equal in all groups. The Catholic Church does not have more.

  • uvuvuv

    i think what gays need is a good eye chart. for one to be gay it is an indication of mental imbalances, just as a high body temperature or a fever indicates disease. however my neighbor of several years seemed stable enough to me, therefore it is possible to be gay and okay. if obama is actually gay and his marriage to michelle is just a front, that wouldn’t be likely because he had no designs on the presidency or possibly politics at all when he married her. if he was born in 1960 and was gay in 1990 he wouldn’t have to hide it, this was when everyone who otherwise had somewhat reasonable common sense started to slobber all over the gays and they had all these gay pride parades, etc, and they even let them adopt kids and get into schools as teachers. they’re still trying for the boy scouts, those campouts you know. anyway i think his being gay is less of an issue than his promoting gay marriage. even democrats will ask themselves in the voting booth, do we want to step off this cliff or not.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      “they even let them adopt kids and get into schools as teachers”

      There is no valid reason to not let homosexuals adopt kids or become teachers. As for the Boy Scouts I, personally, think that it is a good group to be in and would benefit all boys. Just make sure the scout masters are not sexual predators.

  • wt

    Romney we know has mental issues. An 18 year old senior assaulting and battery on a classmate. Also, I see gays but never thought that I needed to beat them up. But I guess when one perceives a threat to their manhood, Romney. he must do something and attack.

    We find that homophobes who go out of their way to attack the weak and gay are usually gay closet folks, like Romney.

    • Floridastorm

      Of course Obama doesn’t have mental issues. A Cocain user doesn’t have mental issues? You obviously never went to school in the 40s or 50s. Playground scuffles were commonplace. Every boy got into them. You clowns bringing up a playground scuffle 40 years ago has got to be the biggest laugh of the day. Are you people for real? Of course not, you all support our Marxist/Socialist gay loving dear leader. He’s going down hard in November if the Democrats don’t boot him out beforehand. Even many Democrats can’t stand this clown. There’s talk of Hillary doing a primary against him.

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        Who, exactly, has said that Obama doesn’t have any mental issues? Please, elaborate.

        Obama has been very open about what he has done in the past. Why are you making it sound that he has done something wrong by being open about it.

        I remember when Obama was on one of the talk shows, before he was elected. The Host asked him is he had ever smoked pot, and if he had inhaled. Obama smiled and said “That was the point”. He was right, that WAS the point of smoking pot. But like most immature habits, he outgrew it. As he outgrew the coke.

        None of us have ever said, or indicated that we believed, that Obama was an innocent. But we don’t believe that he was bad, either. He was a child of his times, 2 years younger than I am. I remember what the 70′s and early 80′s were like. He went through the same things that the rest of us at that time were going through. He had a little more, though. He had a Dad from a different country that he never saw, his Mom worked in yet another country, and his Grandparents raised him. Man, I thought I had identity problems going through those years!

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Either he remembers the assault and battery, and is lying about it. Or he truly doesn’t remember it. Either way, there is something very wrong there.

  • wt

    Our first coward President will be bully Romney, as he likes firing people and beating on the weak.

    If he had been in public school Romney would be talking through false teeth right now.

    • Floridastorm

      Yeah, WT, we all know that you were mister tough guy in public school. Probably beat up the little kids and even some girls. We would have loved you on our Navy team in Vietnam.

    • Art

      Read the full stories about what you just said. Another A**hole on the site. Get your facts straight. you sound like your bum hole friend obummer.

  • Patrick

    This morning on Detroit liberal radio a woman known as Mother took calls to find out what the citizens thout of sweetie pie prez’s gay marriage endorsement,at 99 to 1 the black community said Gpd comes 1st and they will not be voting for “the great loverboy agaIn ” Her response was that chrostIans are supposed to ” forgIvIng” and thus are hypocrItes.Seems she forgets that to be forgooven one must 1st REPENT OF THEIR SIN!! So once agaIn the rellatIvIsm and hypocrIsy Is dIrected at God fearIng ( lovIng) chrIstIans that remember the 2 greatest commandments left to us the nIght before hIs crucIfIxtIon #1 Love God wIth ypur wjhole heart,nInd,body and soul and#2 Love as I have loved ypu.To the leftIst medIa thIs antI chrIstIan basher In the whIte hpouse Is the truth and all Gods true belIvers are uneducated sImpletons.

    • Honestly

      WHAT???????

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Whatever.

      IMO, anyone who votes for, or against, someone based solely on one issue is not using their brain. Especially on an issue that does not have any impact on them.

  • uvuvuv

    robert smith, nice try but the aussies hate blacks. they have almost obsessive contempt for the aborigines. no diplomat’s daughter would get within 10 feet on BO. i was in sydney waatching the news when desmond tutu came into the prime minister’s office for a photo op. he sprang up from his desk and shoved him out the door, yelling at him, all on camera. this was in january 1987, and it hardly hints at a filial love.

    • Karolyn

      1987 was a looooong time ago.

    • JON

      It sounds like you hate them as well!

  • Steve E

    I knew Obama was queer when I first saw the news conference that was hosted by Larry Sinclair. He goes into great detail about the events. I know Obama is a queer. I don’t let normalcy bias get in my way.

    • Karolyn

      Oh, goody! Yet another psychic has joined us! You just KNOW, do you?

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        you know better than that karolyn, perhaps he’s attuned to the higher consciousness of the world. Something you would normally say —- :)

      • Steve E

        You are incredulous to the facts that are out there for everyone to see.

  • wordwaryor

    Finally Obama announced his first major attack on Women in his War Against Women. He did it by taking something away from women that they have owned for eons……. Marriage. Marriage was the exclusive domain of women. Don’t believe that, then as a man try to step in when planning a wedding and have it YOUR way. Men play a truly minor and insignificant part in marriage and in a wedding. They pay the preacher and have a rehearsal dinner, big whoop.

    And the sad thing is that Women don’t realize they have Just Been HAD in a big way by the ONE. Marriage is no longer the exclusive domain of women, nor is it their exclusive protection in the bonds of matrimony. Now it belongs to Gays.

    What Obama just DID was to equate WIFE with GAY.
    In Obama’s world Wife = Gay (homosexual of either gender)
    Or it can also be said by Obama and his ilk Gay = Wife

    This was not just an attack on Marriage the institution, but it was a declaration of war on WOMEN (straight women, but women none the less). Women …. you just LOST your very special place in Marriage …… thanks to Obama.

    Close behind Gay Marriage are the following :

    Legalized Bigamy
    Legalized Polygamy
    Legalized Polyamory

    Lowering of the marrying age to 10 or 12 (girls get ready) Moms be prepared for your very young daughters to marry. (Close kin to Pedophilia).

    Look back in 10 years and SEE what hath Obama wrought !!

    It won’t be pretty. And it won’t be Good.

    • Raggs

      Well I guess the goods news out of that is that it will leave more women to straight men.

    • Steve E

      You left out:
      Legalize Beastiality (that’s for the PETA people)

      • Deerinwater

        “Marriage was the exclusive domain of women”

        Oh really? What does all these married women do for men? What part do men play? Just waiting in the wings for a command?

        I do agree that this is an attack on the institution of marriage and the age old accepted belief that matrimony is constituted between a man and woman.

        I would have proffered the label “Civil Union” rather then attempt to change the meaning of the word “Marriage” and the long tradition that marriage implies, willing to accept notion sexual orientation is determined at birth or prior.

      • Honestly

        Can we get anymore disgusting?

        • 4LoveOfGod&Country

          @Honestly: Yes, fisting~a tie for first.

    • Proud to be a Believer

      The marrying age is already 10 to 12 among muslims plus they can have 4 wives – so what is new.

    • Karolyn

      “This was not just an attack on Marriage the institution, but it was a declaration of war on WOMEN (straight women, but women none the less). Women …. you just LOST your very special place in Marriage …… thanks to Obama. ”

      Do you seriously believe that ALL women want to get married? Marriage rates are at an al-time low. I think you’re a little behind the times. I just don’t get your speaking of women’s “very special place in marriage.” Men and women should be equals, as gays and lesbians should be equal with anybody else.

      Also, what’s wrong with ploygamy? If the participants have no problem with it, why should anyone else? I was not aware that polyamory was againt the law.

      • wordwaryor

        Karolyn

        Why would you think that because all women don’t want to get marriage, that this should nullify or ruin it for those who do ? Marriage is protective of Women. Otherwise most men would not marry either, but would just shack up and move on to another woman. Most guys actually are not enamored with the institution of marriage and get jittery when theirs approaches.

        Marriage guarantees most women a portion of the spoils (or the estate) in a divorce. And I say that it is rightfully theirs.

        Polygamy is against the law. Polyamory is Polygamy on steroids therefore it is against the law too.

        My point is that women just got royally ripped off by Obama ….. and most don’t know it yet.

      • wordwaryor

        Karolyn

        If Men and women are equal in marriage ……. (maybe under the law they are) … just try to let any man tell the women planning the wedding HOW it is going to be done ….. and see how far HE gets with THAT !! ( I think you know how that will go.)

        Men are regularly put in their place with regard to wedding planning. And their place is on the outside while the planning gets done. The bride and her mom usually plan the wedding. The groom just (hopefully) shows up and goes through with it.

      • 4LoveOfGod&Country

        @Karolyn: Marriage is a Holy union between A man & A woman; God’s creation. Period.

      • Karolyn

        wordwaryor – Marriage really has nothing to do with the wedding. All that money, pomp and ceremony mean nothing. It’s the commitment of the people involved that matters. Personally, I don’t see the necessity, especially since so many end up in divorce anyway. They’re easy to get into but oh-so-hard to get out of. And, sorry, I have known many men who pushed for marriage to their lovers.

      • eddie47d

        So correct Karolyn and 51% of heterosexuals become divorced so maybe marriage shouldn’t be the standard bearer. Loving Commitment would be a better standard for all.

    • JON

      Wow! You sure do concentrate on some weird stuff. You must be a weird person!

      • Honestly

        This response is to Karolyn….The reason marriages end in divorce is there is no true covenant commitment in many marriages today. Marriages are entered into without proper commitment and true love and divorces happen because of the same reason. Marriage was ordained from the beginning as a covenant commitment between a man and and women, to have a family and that can not be accomplished naturally any other way. That is an excellent indicator that there is only one acceptable marriage between a man and a woman, natures way, God’s way.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      You mean going back to Biblical morals?

  • jopa

    libertytrains mention of aids and Rock Hudson reminds me of the story being circulated back then about Miss Liberty.Supposedley she had contracted aids and New Yorkers were not sure, but she may have gotten it from the Mouth of the Hudson or the Staten Island Ferry

  • Pingback: The sh_t finally floats to the surface! - Shooting Sports Forum

    • Honestly

      WHAT??????

  • sesame

    No proof here. Only innuendo and unreliable sources

  • Palin16

    Perhaps Bawney Fwank should give Obummer some teabagging lessons to help in the latter’s evolution.

    • jopa

      I thought Sara Palin & Michelle Bachman were the Teabagger leaders.

      • Neil

        Evidently Jopa, you do not understand basic anatomy.

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        thinking has not been one of jopa’s specialties.

  • chuckb

    we in california have a married homosexual as governor, jerry moonbeam brown.now we have a president of that gender. what’s really funny is to read what the bolsheviks have to say, they immediately run up a defense, they try to accuse past conservatives of being gay, that;s really a stretch. their problem is this guy soetoro pulled the wool over their eyes.” he really sucked them in”. they don’t know where he was born, they don’t know for real who is father was, they don’t know how he got to the u.s., they don’t know where he attended school or what his academic grades were. what do they know about this guy?
    “they don’t know anything, but, they know he’s not gay”
    i understand hillary is giving bill the boot and moving in with a girl friend, now isn’t that a laugh, we have gay president and secretary of state. (information from a shock magazine at the market) of course we have to take this into consideration, the bolshevik party is made up of many different types a party under a large tent, wow! what a party.

  • Neil

    Now we know why he will screw everyone with equal enthusiasm.

    • Deerinwater

      LOL! An equal opportunity screwer! Well, no one need fear left out!

  • Raggs

    Can you picture obama and biden in a bath tub together?.. Maybe thats obamas next campaign sloggan….

  • Jeremy Leochner

    Obama is not gay. A person does not have to be gay to support gay rights.

    • Tom Cook

      Oh, he’s queer alright; he’s a regular Bruno. Count on it. I guess you probably are too.

      • JON

        Sorry, but I could quite understand what your saying with my **** in your mouth.

      • Jeremy Leochner

        Actually no. I am straight. Again though I put the question. Does supporting gay rights require one to be gay? I do not believe so. The founding fathers created a nation founded on the principle that all men are created equal. They made no mention of any exception to that rule.

      • eddie47d

        Conservatives make exceptions for everything. They have padlocks on their Constitutional doors of equality unless you are their clone.

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      How would you know he’s not gay, Jeremy; because he’s married?

      • Jeremy Leochner

        Got me there. Im just questioning the logic that simply because the president supports gay rights he must therefore be gay himself.

      • JeffH
      • Jeremy Leochner

        Not to be picky Jeff. But in the article you used one of the “sources” is the national enquirer and another is a rumor about an actor. Not exactly the most trust worthy sources of information on the President of the United States. In fact all of the information provided at the top of the article consisted of accusations, suspicions and hear say. Not to be rude but I will need more than people accusing the president of being gay before I believe the president is gay.

      • JeffH
      • JeffH
      • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

        Jeremy says: Not to be rude but I will need more than people accusing the president of being gay before I believe the president is gay.

        Would it bother you, Jeremy, if you were to learn the Obama is gay, or bi-sexual?

      • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

        Jay, if I were to find out that Obama was gay, would I be disappointed? Yes, but only because he didn’t tell the truth. Not because he was gay. Would that cause me to not vote for him? Of course not. What he does in his private life is no business of mine, unless what he is doing has been proven to be criminal. That does not, btw, include state anti-homosexuality laws.

      • Jeremy Leochner

        Actually no Jay. I would not be bothered. I would feel bad for first lady Michelle. But I figure if Obama is a competent leader as I believe he is it does not matter what his orientation is.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Jeremy, quite right. The majority of people that I know support same-sex marriage. I know 1 gay person who supports it, and 1 who doesn’t.

      Only the ignorant believe that if you support same-sex marriage it means that you are gay.

      • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

        tigeer says: Only the ignorant believe that if you support same-sex marriage it means that you are gay.

        No one here stated that, if one supports gay-marriage it means that one is gay. That, out-of-thin-air accusation/assertion/conclusion was concocted by Mr. Leockner.

        The accusation that obama is gay, or bi-sexual, we were making long, before obama committed to supporting gay-marriage, and, we always included verifiable facts/proof, that were always, dismissed.

        And, btw, you may recall, that previously, obama, was opposed to gay-marriage, having clearly stated: “Marriage, is between a man and a Woman”, yet, we still held to the belief; that obama was gay! So then, according to yours, and Jeremy’s logic, at that time, we would have accused obama of being a heterosexual, and not, a homosexual.

        Clearly. yours, and Jeremy’s assertion, that because obama supports gay-marriage, therefore, we believe that means he’s gay, is self-serving at best, and completely false, to be more precise!

        We believed it then, when obama was opposed to gay-marriage, and we believe it still, even now. But we also understand why, he flip-flopped on the issue. Clearly, his chances for re-election are slim, to none, and using the gay vote, is nothing more then a pathetic display of desperation!

        And lastly, the only ignorant one’s, appear to be you, and Mr.Leockner, as you both assume, much too much, i’m afraid!

      • Jeremy Leochner

        Perhaps I was general in my statement Jay. My “assertion” was in regards to the title of this article and its content. My assertion was to the effect that while perhaps people have believed the president was gay it has only become a public issue since he came out in support of gay rights. I was simply commenting on the odd timing of this and other “is obama gay?” articles. It may be that people thought president obama was gay but evidently it was fine until he came out in support of gay rights.

  • wordwaryor

    Once Gay marriage becomes the law of the land (Under Obama’s 2nd term perhaps) … My advice to any one getting married (or my opinion to myself) would be ….. Why bother ….
    IT doesn’t mean anything anymore anyway.

    • Karolyn

      The meaning is in what is perceived by the participants.

    • eddie47d

      With equality for all without exceptions it should improve marriage.

    • Jeremy Leochner

      People who are homosexual want to have loving committed relationships. Homosexuals getting married cannot diminish the beauty of marriage. Marriage is about love and commitment between two people of consenting age. It is about consent and commitment. Homosexuals being allowed to perform the same ceremony with the same legal standing will not change what the ceremony is about. If marriage is truly about love, honor, and caring then I see no reason why homosexuals cannot partake.

    • Raggs

      Nope.. there will have to be yet another entitlement program for the flakes of course funded by the tax payer.

  • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

    If the rise of Nazism in Germany was made possible, at least in part, by the homosexualization of German society, what does this bode for America as we watch the steady advance of the “gay” agenda in this culture?

    Should we expect to witness something like the rise of a Third Reich on American soil? Or would the effect on American society be of an entirely different character?

    Is the “gay” movement in the United States sufficiently similar to its German counterpart as even to warrant concern? (Certainly the German “gay” culture was far more militaristic than the homosexual movement here, for example). Or is this the wrong question?

    Is there something about homosexuality (or the broader problem of sexual libertinism) that inevitably destroys the society that embraces it?

    Perhaps the most helpful approach is to search the history of homosexual activism in America for parallels with the German experience.

    The first openly homosexual organization in the United States was the American chapter of the German Society for Human Rights, started in 1924. The SHR was an aberration, however.

    The American homosexual movement really only began in the 1940s after the Allied defeat of the Nazis. We must begin our time line, then, with the observation that the center of international “gay” power in the world did in fact shift from Germany to the United States after the demise of the Third Reich.

    This represented a huge setback for the “gay” movement, requiring it to begin “from scratch” as it were, since America in the 1940s was at least as family-centered as Germany had been in the 1860s.

    We know that the implicit goal of homosexual political activism is to legitimize homosexual conduct and relationships in a society.

    This necessarily requires a society to abandon its commitment to marriage as the exclusive domain of acceptable sexual conduct. The abandonment of this standard logically opens the door to every other form of sexual promiscuity.

    Clearly, such a transformation of attitude is now occurring in America. What we will find is that this transformation is not the result of random social forces, but of deliberate and systematic political activism by the “gay” movement. From “THE PINK SWASTIKA”:

    http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm

    • 4LoveOfGod&Country

      @Jay:WOW! “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.” Ephesians 6:12

      • Honestly

        Amen!

      • Rebecca

        Preach it Brother! Or Sister! Whatever the case may be. We cannot fight against the evil that lives in this world. All we can do is trust the Lord God Jehovah and do what His Word tells us is right.

      • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

        They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.” Romans 1:25 (NAB)

    • Jeremy Leochner

      The rise of nazism in Germany had nothing to do with homosexuality. Unless you also believe the increase in the number of Jews in Germany or the number of Communists caused the rise of nazism. The nazi despised and hated homosexuals.
      As to the comparison of the two I would say this. The “homosexual agenda” is to attain
      acceptance and acknowledgment of their rights as human beings. Their right to be who they are and to not be prevented from marrying based on it. They are not trying to force their lifestyle on anyone. Discrimination is discrimination and homosexuals want to counteract discrimination. They do not want to change marriage or hurt people who are heterosexual. They just do not want to be hurt because they are homosexual. There is no “pink swastika”. People have a right to be who they are. Homosexuality is not a choice in my opinion. Therefore only homosexuals are in any way affected by it. As such they have a right to be who they are and should not be judged based on their orientation. They should be judged on their actions just like everyone else.

      • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

        Yours, is an opinion, Jeremy. I, on the other hand, posted a link to a well documented, historically-verifiable article. I think its safe to assume, it, the article, trumps your fanciful musings!

      • Jeremy Leochner

        Jay. Homosexuality has existed since time immemorial. It has existed since long before there was a gay “movement”. Perhaps some leaders of the movement for gay rights have been shady and unscrupulous or even violent and extremist. But we cannot judge an entire group of people based on the actions of a few.
        Also the nazi singled out and killed homosexuals. That is not musings or feelings, that is the truth. The desire for equal rights is not the same as what the nazis did. In fact its no where close. That is not a muse or feeling or fantasy. Human rights are human rights. We cannot deny an entire group of people basic rights based on the actions of some of them. Being gay dose not make a person more likely to commit violence or more likely to do anything immoral or criminal. If it did than every gay person would experience problems with such issues. I have friends who are gay who never exhibited any signs of violence or aggression or extremism even when angered or when discussing issues important to them. I simply do not believe that I should treat a person differently simply because they are gay. Call me fanciful but I believe people should be judged by their actions not by their sexual orientation.

      • Zed

        Jeremy, having read The Rise & Fall of the Third Reich – twice – I think I can say with some authority that the Nazis didn’t exactly hate and despise homosexuals. Rather, they were inconveniently inconsistent with the party line.
        Hitler actively recruited from the gay community in the early days of the Nazi party, particularly for his brown shirts.
        After he came to power, the brown shirts themselves were an inconvenient artifact of his early days. They demanded a place in the new Nazi government, with authority appropriate to the part they played in getting Hitler into power.
        So he had them killed.
        On a side note, being Jewish or homosexual weren’t the only things that got you a one-way ride to the death camps. Gypsies, freemasons, mental defectives, and a host of other groups were marked for extermination.

        For an outstanding dramatization of the meeting in which the final solution was settled, I recommend the HBO movie “Conspiracy.”

      • Jeremy Leochner

        i have read numerous books on nazi germany as well. I know that homosexuals were in the early SA. I would point out hitler did not actively recruit homosexuals. He was willing to but did not seek them out. He did get rid of his homosexual friends when they became inconvenient but he always persecuted homosexuals. He just protected his friends as long as he could use them.

        I do know gays and jews were not the only ones persecuted.

  • Deborah

    Hmmmm, maybe he’s more “historical” than we first thought!!!

  • donnasalvini

    He’s gay as a 3 dollar bill. And he’s a globalist and puppet of the elite. What bothers me most about him being gay is not that he IS gay but that he covers it up. The man was not born here and he is the biggest warmonger the country has ever known. He should be impeached. I”m so tired of ANYONE trying to justify ANYTHING about Obama. His Monsanto-stacked FDA, his assassination of 2 US citizens, his signing of the NDAA, his unconstitutional war on Libya, his putting more troops in Afghanistan than Bush. On and on. The man is pure evil no matter what letter comes after his name. IMPEACH the traitor.

  • JON

    Money is gay?!?!?!?!?

  • http://yahoo red

    Obama’s whole life appears to be one huge lie!

  • Charlie Sheen

    Obummer and John Travolta are gay lovers.

  • http://www.survivingurbancrisis.com/ Silas Longshot

    Nuttin’ to see here, folks, move along.
    Why would him being gay be such a surprise? He’s been ‘bi’ on every other issue, has he not? Takin’ it both ways on everything he does. And giving America the shaft.

  • Gani M. Bautista

    Is he really? Wow, so this is his comouflage? Do we have the hard evidence? If no evidence … this is just mere hearsay.

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community, as well as veteran political sources in the city.

      The bath house, Man’s Country, caters to older white men and it has been in business for some 30 years and is known as one of uptown Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses.” WMR was told by sources who are familiar with the bath house that it provides one-year “lifetime” memberships to paying customers and that the club’s computerized files and pre-computer paper files, include membership information for both Obama and Emanuel.

      The data is as anonymized as possible for confidentiality purposes. However, sources close to “Man’s Country” believe the U.S. Secret Service has purged the computer and filing cabinet files of the membership data on Obama and Emanuel.

      Members of Man’s Country are also issued club identification cards. WMR learned that Obama and Emanuel possessed the ID cards, which were required for entry.

      Obama began frequenting Man’s Country in the mid-1990s, during the time he transitioned from a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School to his election as an Illinois State Senator in 1996.

      Emanuel, reportedly joined Man’s Country after he left the Clinton White Hosue and moved back to Chicago in 1998, joining the investment firm of Wasserstein Perella and maintaining his membership during his 2002 campaign for the U.S. 5th District House seat vacated by Rod Blagojevich, who was elected governor.

      Man’s Country appears to be a “one stop shopping” center for gay men. The club’s website advertises steam rooms, “fantasy rooms,” bed rooms, male strippers, adult movies, and lockers.

      However, Man’s Country was not the only location for Obama’s predatory gay sex activities.

      The Chicago gay community is aware that Obama often made contacts with younger men at his famous “pick-up basketball” games. It was at these “pick up” matches where Obama first met Emanuel and a young Democratic campaign worker and senior bank vice president named Alexi Giannoulias. Currently running for Obama’s old U.S. Senate seat now occupied by Roland Burris, Giannoulias successfully ran for Illinois Treasurer in 2006 after being drafted for the run by Chicago’s Democratic machine.

      The Blagojevich trial: “Sex, Lies, and Audio tapes” — Fitzgerald’s US Attorney’s Office part of White House cover-up of gay sex in the Second City.

      Continued: http://thejaghunter.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/lets-ask-and-do-tell-is-obama-gay/

  • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

    Let the chatteratti and political pundits say what they will, dancing around the issue of gay marriage on Obama’s chances of reelection, but I will tell you plainly that he has swallowed a poison pill.

    Gay marriage is a deal-breaker for a vast swath of American voters that includes Catholics as well as the black and Hispanic communities.

    Urbanites and suburbanites may say that they are okay with gay marriage, but what they tell pollsters and what they say privately among friends and family is far different. Americans may want to be tolerant, but their distaste for the gay lifestyle and incessant demands for acceptance is deeply offensive to most people.

    Thanks to what will be seen as a historic gaffe by Vice President Joe Biden, the President was put in a vice as he was seen to vacillate—evolve—his position regarding gay marriage, but elections often turn on such issues.

    Yes, the economy will be the dominant issue of the 2012 election, but the President found himself in a position where he could not avoid taking a position. It was diametrically different from the one he expressed in the 2008 campaign.

    If, as anticipated, pro-gay-marriage activists get a plank in the Democratic Party platform affirming their stance, that will further lock the party into an uncompromising position on the issue. Ironically, they will hold their convention in North Carolina, a state that just made headlines by resoundingly rejecting gay marriage.

    Legalized same-sex marriage exists in just eight states and the District of Columbia. In purely political terms, the swing states Obama needs for reelection—Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, and Florida—have all banned gay marriage. Now add North Carolina.

    For the record, I have little faith in the polls that seem to suggest that gay marriage is gaining wider acceptance.

    People who do not feel comfortable being labeled “homophobes” and bigots tend to tell pollsters they are okay with gay marriage even if they are not.

    The much-quoted Gallop poll on gay rights noted that the Catholic Church opposes same-sex marriage and “less than half of Protestants approve.” According to the poll, among those who attend religious services weekly, fully 67 percent oppose it while among those who say they attend monthly 53 percent oppose it.

    Politically, while a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll showed that gay marriage is supported by two-thirds of Democrats, it also showed that only 46 percent of independents favored it.

    Asking Democrats to endorse gay marriage is, in a sense, a no-brainer, but in an election year, the issue will drive independents to the right, a losing proposition for Democrats and Obama.

    Incensed by Obamacare, the issue that ignited the creation of the Tea Party movement, by the failed stimulus, by scandals involving “green energy” companies that cost Americans millions, by Fast and Furious, an Obama administration sponsored gun-running operation, and the sluggish “recovery”, Obama already faces an uphill battle for reelection.

    While trying to hang the “flip-lopper” anvil around Mitt Romney’s neck, Obama has demonstrated a major flip-flop from his earlier position that marriage is “between and a man and a woman.”

    Romney has never wavered on gay marriage, opposing it. You can begin to put the undecided votes in his column.

    Even in California where Proposition 8 passed 52 percent to 48 percent, a gay rights measure was struck down by the courts and currently is making its way through the appeals process. In 2006 Arizona similarly passed a gay marriage measure by a slim 51 percent but voted two years later to ban it.

    Obama is now trapped between liberals who favor gay marriage and a significant margin of socially conservative voters who oppose it. They are likely to decide the 2012 election.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46587

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Most of the Conservatives that I know believe that same-sex marriage is a right. They, also, believe that NOT believing it is a right is a religious belief. We have a secular government. You cannot force your religious views into law. It is unconstitutional.

  • JeffH

    Obama’s Gay Past
    December 4, 2011

    During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.

    The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

    On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.
    http://actualgrit.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/obamas-gay-past/

    UPDATE: Third man comes forward to AP.

    A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago.

    He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation.
    ____________________________________________

    Personally speaking, I could care less whether Obama, or anybody else for that matter, is gay or not.

    • Linda

      If only we could count on any of this information actually getting out to the public. Can we ever count on the “Responsible Press” to publish any of the findings on Obama’s past homosexual behaviour, or the execution-style slayings of Donald Young and Larry Bland? We never could get them to take seriously any of the issues of the ongoing teachings of Reverand Wright, against the United States specifically, and white people in general.The press has been doing a cover-up for Obama from the very beginning, and I am very concerned they will continue to do so until he is re-elected. We have to find a way to not let that happen. Our country can not stand another four years of Obama.

  • Raggs

    Yup it looks like the taxpayer is going to get shafted again punn intended… A new entitlement system to support queers.

  • JeffH

    Obama’s sexual relationships with other men, including named D.C. politicians and Donald Young, the openly-gay choir-director of the church in Chicago of which Obama was a member for some 20 years — Jeremy Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ black liberation theology. Obama’s relationship with Young was confirmed by Larry Sinclair, who claims to have had two sex-cocaine trysts with Obama.

    Larry Bland
    There were two other openly gay men in Wright’s church: Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. In late 2007, as Obama began his ascent to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, in a span of 1½ months, all three men “conveniently” died:

    - Bland was murdered execution-style on November 17, 2007;
    - Young was murdered execution-style on December 24, 2007;
    - Spencer reportedly died of septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV on December 26, 2007.

    Now, Young’s elderly mother is speaking out about her suspicions that her son was murdered to protect Obama’s reputation and assure his political future as President.
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/mom-of-murdered-obama-gay-lover-speaks-up/

    • Palin16

      Jeff,
      did you happen to catch any of Obummer’s inauguration festivities? Remember there was a gay marching band parading down Pennsylvania Avenue. I turned off the TV for the rest of the day.

      • JeffH

        Palin16, can’t say that I ever wanted to watch his parade. Doesn’t surprise me either. Being raised in the SF Bay Area/East Bay, I don’t even notice who’s gay or who’s not…unless they’re flamers.

  • JeffH

    Death Certificates Of Murdered Donald Young And Larry Bland – Both From Obama’s Church
    rense.com 7-21-8
    http://www.rense.com/general82/cdet.htm

    • chuckb

      are we sure hillary and bill were not mentors of barry instead of ayers “vince foster” and numerous others.

  • chuckb

    all this time i thought moochella was the cross dresser.

  • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

    The story of the occult in world history is also a story of homosexuality. By occult, we mean the formalized religious expression of pagan culture as opposed, for example, to the philosophical ideas of Hellenic paganism.

    In The Occult Roots of Nazism, historian Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke identifies the roots of occultism in western history:

    Occultism has its basis in a religious way of thinking, the roots of which stretch back into antiquity….Its principal ingredients have been identified as Gnosticism, the Hermetic treatises on alchemy and magic [rooted in Gnosticism], Neo-Platonism, and the Cabbala….Gnosticism properly refers to the beliefs of certain heretical sects among the early Christians that claimed to possess gnosis, or special esoteric knowledge of spiritual matters….The Gnostic sects disappeared in the fourth century, but their ideas inspired the dualistic Manichaean religion of the second century (Goodrick-Clarke:17)

    Since occultism is associated primarily with Gnosticism, the association of the Gnostics with homosexuality is of primary relevance to this study. Thus we found an obscure reference to Hitler as a Manichaean in Steven Katz’s The Holocaust in Historical Context, Volume 1, of interest. Arthur Evans’ Witchcraft and the Gay Counterculture provides some illumination here.

    Mani, for whom Manichaeism is named, was a third century Prince of Babylon who devised his own form of Gnosticism.

    Gnostics blended pagan sex rituals and Mother Goddess worship with elements of New Testament Christianity and “rejected Jehovah God as an evil demon.” Manichaeism imposed on Gnosticism a caste system of leaders (elect) and followers (hearers).

    A Manichaean sect called the Bogomils (later called the Cathars) arose in Bulgaria and spread across Europe. Homosexuality became so closely associated with these Bulgarian heretics that the practice became known as “buggery.” Indeed, “the word for Cathar in most European languages came to be the word for homosexual: in German, Ketzer, in Italian, Gazarro, and in French, Herite….Heresy and homosexuality became so interchangeable that those accused of heresy attempted to prove their innocence by claiming heterosexuality” (Evans:51ff).

    We probably all take for granted the fact that today our modern world culture is dominated by the religions based on the Mosaic law (i.e. Judaism, Christianity and Islam). In their orthodox forms each of these religions regards homosexuality as an abomination.

    But pagan cultures have no such prohibition. (By definition, pagans are people who are not Jews, Christians or Moslems). In pagan cultures, homosexuals as a group often hold an elevated position in religion and society. When pagan civilizations ruled the world, homosexuality and pederasty were widely practiced and accepted. Homosexualist author Judy Grahn writes,

    Many aspects of shamanism had homosexual content, and many of the gods, spirits, and divinities of the world have been associated with Gayness.

    In Tahiti there were special divinities for homosexual worship.

    The ancient Shinto temples of Japan display scenes of sexual ritual orgies similar to those of the Bacchanalia of the Romans…the Great Mother Goddess of ancient China, Kwan-Yin, was worshiped with sexual rites that included homosexuality.

    When the Spanish conquistadores reached Central America and the Yucatan, they found a prevalence of Gay priests and sacred statues and stone sculpture depicting the homosexual union as a sacred act.

    In the Yucatan the god Chin is said to have established sacred homosexuality and a Gay priesthood serving in the temples just as was true of the temples of ancient Babylon and Sumeria (Grahn:129).

    From the “Pink Swastika”:

    http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm

  • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

    “Sullivan (and Newsweek, for that matter) is likely unaware of Obama’s gay past, which the mainstream media have attempted to keep locked in the closet.”

    What gay past? There have been rumors, but they are mostly spread by those opposed to Obama. Since there is no proof, I see it as just more trying to scam people into believing that Obama is some kind of monster.

    More and more people in this country are getting more than a little bit fed up with this nonsense.

    Another thing that is nonsense is the idea that anyone who supports same-sex marriage is gay themselves. Sorry, guy, wrong channel. We believe it’s a matter of equal rights and the fact that we have a secular, deliberately secular, government. We want it to stay that way. You believe whatever you like, but you do not have the right to dictate what others believe.

    • Floridastorm

      May I ask what equal rights you are talking about, my friend? Everyone born in this country has “equal rights” that are given in our Bill of Rights. So, in a sense you are saying that gays should be given “special rights”. Now, if you’re talking about things like discrimination and harassment, well there are already criminal and civil laws against such behavior. So, tell me. what the hell are you talking about, anyway. Or, are you just making it up as you go along to meet your agenda?

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      tigeer says: What gay past? There have been rumors, but they are mostly spread by those opposed to Obama. Since there is no proof, I see it as just more trying to scam people into believing that Obama is some kind of monster.

      What are you saying tigeer, that being gay, is equal to being a monster? Shame on you! And why wouldn’t you wish, or be happy with the fact that obama is gay? After all. you are for gay-rights, gay-marriage, right?

      tigeer says: Another thing that is nonsense is the idea that anyone who supports same-sex marriage is gay themselves.

      There’s ample evidence that supports the allegation that obama is, at the very least, bi-sexual. Again, i ask you; would that not please you, liberals?

      tigeer says: Sorry, guy, wrong channel. We believe it’s a matter of equal rights and the fact that we have a secular, deliberately secular, government. We want it to stay that way. You believe whatever you like, but you do not have the right to dictate what others believe.

      We? YOU, believe whatever you want? We have a secular Government? So what are we to make of Obama’s claim to being a Christian? Yet, he acts like muslim, and dreams like a radical-socialist. Apparently, the boy is more confused then we first suspected! One thing’s for sure, however, you radical/socialist/fascist half-wits, can scarcely keep your stories straight!

      Btw, before before you get your knickers in a bunch, i referred to him as “boy”, which is an endearing term, only because i happen to be his senior, by about 20!

  • chuckb

    tigeer, barry has kept his past a deep secret, he has refused to submit evidence to squelch these rumors and as for your assertion “we do not have the right to dictate what we believe to others”, we have the right to speak our peace and if that bothers you, turn the page.
    if these allegations are not true, then mr.soetoro should step forward and deny them, it is very difficult to tell the truth at times and so easy to spin the web of deceit.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Speaking your piece and saying that because you believe one way that you have the right to force others to live the way you believe are two very, very different things.

      Evidence? What are you talking about? The only evidence that was needed to become President didn’t even need to be presented to the public – his birth certificate. He presented his state-issued, state-certified birth certificate to who he was supposed to present it to. The fact that there are a lot of people who are convinced that they have the right to more than that, doesn’t mean that they do.

      What is being demanded – school, passport, selective service records- are not public. And the public does not have the right to them. Period. If you don’t wish to vote for him because he refuses to release non-public records, then fine. But each of us have the right to decided that issue for ourselves. And we did. You just didn’t like it.

      • chuckb

        maybe you should revisit the constitution, it clearly states the president must be a naturalized citizen. the documents he provided are fraudulent,
        i suppose in your view anyone that can gather enough votes can be president and you accept his word he is a citizen. yes, i believe most liberals have this train of thought, no rules just what ever feels good..
        the man is a disgrace to the office and the democratic party shares the honor,.
        the same goes for bill and hillary clinton.

        “more and more people are getting fed up with these allegations about barry,”
        are you paying attention the people are getting fed up with barry and his insidious past, and his complete failure as president. thank you bolshevik party.

        • Deerinwater

          “i believe most liberals have this train of thought, no rules just what ever feels good.”

          You hold tight to your beliefs, I don’t mind you being wrong ~ I depend on it. Just be a “constant” so I might use you to navigate treacherous waters.

          But I really don’t expect you to ever invest to time to actually understand the progressive mind. It’s not in you. Since you have not stop to understand your own, why should you?

          “No rules, whatever feels good”? as opposed to what ? Rules and feeling bad?

          That’s the “Christian Programming” coming forward. ~ Feeling good is bad! ~ We need redemption and atonement, you are not suppose to feel good, you were born into sin, by sin and you are a “sinner”

          And there is always “Rules”, someone is always crafting and enforcing rules. I would think that we are all familiar with the program by now. The Banking Act of 1933 was a rule until 1999 when some cleaver bankers and their attorneys convinced our statesman we did need them. So we threw the rules away. Now we enjoy privatized profits and socialized losses. ~ aren’t we lucky!

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      The fact that he doesn’t step forward and deny the allegations, chuckb,speaks volumes. Besides, i fail to understand why the libs on this site are all a-frantic at the thought that he might be gay; you would think that they would be, delirious!

      But of course, we know the reason why; should it ever be discovered that he is gay, it would expose the fact that his marriage is a sham, and he, to be nothing more then a poser. Seems to me, he wears that hat, rather well. But the question of whether or not he is gay, is not the issue here. The issue is that, now, he’s for gay-marriage because he wants to garner the gay-vote. Simple! But i wonder if the gay-community is fooled by his, less-then-honest manipulation of them? I’m willing to bet that they are not!

      • Deerinwater

        “. But the question of whether or not he is gay, is not the issue here. The issue is that, now, he’s for gay-marriage because he wants to garner the gay-vote. Simple! But i wonder if the gay-community is fooled by his, less-then-honest manipulation of them? I’m willing to bet that they are not!”

        Exactly Jay, ~ I attempted to point that out rather early and Jeff tried to hump on my leg for my efforts.

        Saying, it was confusing, suggesting my post unworthy consideration. ( Well that’s Jeff for you, ~~
        This zeal to paint Obama is just great, too inciting to see what this all means in a rational manner. The GOP and The Tea Party should be celebrating, it’s Christmas come early.

        Even you comment fail to ring completely clear when you suggest that the Gay Community might be somehow “fooled” by Obama . Fooled in what way pray tell?

        That the Gay Community represents only 1.8 to 3% of the American population, What gains can be found for Obama in openly endorsing same sex marriage that only effects so few people while disgusting 97% of voters. ?

        I would suggest to you there isn’t any, finding the down side much greater the the up side. The topic could been easily not addressed.

        Then there is the timing of this announcement to consider. Why now? Why anytime? Was it extracted by force? I failed to see it as such.

        This announcement has done Obama significant harm. The Pastors in the churches all across America his going to have a field day from now until November.

        So unless you can show me some advantages enjoy from this announcement, I’m left to believe the it was made on principle and notions of fairness.

        So how has Obama fooled the Gay Community?

        Let’s face it Jay, ~ It’s not in the job description that a President must make popular decisions but sound one, ~ to be President to ALL Americans and not a few, the wealthy or just the noisy.

  • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

    The homosexual lifestyle is one that leads away from truth and sanity, in varying degrees.

    Dr. Brian Clowes brought to light the fact that eight of the top ten serial killers in the United States were homosexual “and that homosexuals were responsible for 68% of all mass murders.”

    I don’t mean to suggest that most homosexuals are wont to bury their lovers/prey under their house like John Wayne Gacy, or save them as frozen left-overs a la Jeffery Dahlmer, but you have to admit, the fact that eight of the top ten mass murderers are homosexual gives one pause. Those are pretty impressive stats for such a small segment of the population.

    Add to that the fact that the homosexual lifestyle is decidedly unhealthy, and you have every reason in the world to oppose the spread of this dysfunctional way of life.

    Don Hank suggested a few years ago that young men ensnared into homosexuality ought to look into suing the “gay” activist groups. After all, the homosexual lifestyle is a much unhealthier and deadly practice than smoking, and a number of people have successfully sued the tobacco companies. Peter LaBarbera of AFTAH (Americans For Truth About Homosexuality) has also promoted this idea.

    If America is ever to get back on track it appears that it is up to “we the people,” or as BP chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg endearingly called us, “the small people.” (Yes Carl we know—you “misspoke.” You no doubt meant to say “the ignorant, gun toting, Bible clinging, inconsequential people.” We understand).

    We understand that we are witnessing déja vu all over again—that we are already feeling the effects of Weimar Republic-style hyper-inflation. We understand that QE (Qualitative Easing) is a recipe for financial disaster—the equation being, QE = PMM (Print More Money). Economics 101 shows the suicidal insanity of such a formula. Link

    We understand that today’s militant “gay rights” activists are merely Roehm’s bully-boy brownshirts dressed in different clothes. Lively observes that “the ‘gay’ movement “I have seen and investigated is neither benign, nor are its members ‘victims.’ It is vicious, deceptive, and enormously powerful. Its philosophy is Machiavellian and its tactics are (literally) Hitlerian.”

    We understand that the lame stream media is in bed with, if not controlled by, Butch homosexuals. It is a propaganda machine that the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, would have given an arm for.

    We understand that Obama is using the unions just as Hitler did, and that crony capitalism has replaced free enterprise, just as it did in Nazi Germany.

    We understand that our government representatives do not represent us, and that their thinly veiled arrogance is emblematic of certain elements of Butch homosexuals, and other narcissists.

    We understand that the anti-Zionist movement is the same old anti-Judeo/Christian paganism that the Nazis practiced, behind a facade of rhetoric about “democracy” and “human rights.”

    We understand that the same Nazi system that America fought a long, bloody war to defeat, is back wearing different clothes, but this time—this time the Fascists hold the reins of power in America. “We the people” understand all this, and we will do our best to restore America to the “bright shining city on the hill” she was meant to be—whatever it takes.

    Laus Deo.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37535

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      Actually, Jay, this is nonsense. And is not supported by any scientific of psychiatric studies.

      • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

        Psychiatry? Good golly, tigeer, don’t tell me that you are one of those gullible’s that bought into the lie that psychiatry is a science? Its a farcical and pseudo science, at best, and the same goes for psychology! They both should be considered dangerous!

        Why do i think the pseudo-sciences of psychology and psychiatry are dangerous?

        The reason i think psychology and psychiatry are so very dangerous is their false, deceitful, and dishonest claims about what they are and what they can do.

        They claim to be a “Science” and thus endeavor to benefit from the prestige and reputability achieved by the exact sciences, such as Chemistry and Physics.

        In fact, they deal with a subject matter so totally different in its basic nature from that of the exact sciences that the tools and techniques of the exact sciences are inapplicable and don’t work at all. The exact sciences deal with natural processes and phenomena that operate in exact, precise accordance with underlying exact natural laws; laws relating quantities that can be measured by instruments of one kind or another; laws which can be expressed with mathematical exactitude.

        In contrast psychology and psychiatry deal with the subject matter of emotions, feelings and attitudes; of human relationships, outlooks and values. Their “quantities” and “variables” are these kinds of things.

        In essence, they arrogantly purport to provide “scientific” answers to questions that wise men and thinkers have been pondering for ages. In actual fact it is all self-deception, delusion, sham, hoax and foolishness.

        In actual fact the answers they provide are far less trustworthy, far less reliable, than those given by the wise men and thinkers of past ages.

        In my opinion, psychology and psychiatry, like a false religion, with its system of false ideas, beliefs, assumptions and teachings, has been responsible for an untold amount of wrong, suffering and harm in this world. It has done enormous damage.

        Psychology and psychiatry are indeed dangerous and perilous snares for the gullible. For those easily taken in.

  • Lucinda

    Jay, Interesting and valid analysis. History does repeat itself and the current administration is leading us much like the NAZI’s mislead the Germans. Obama’s own insistence that US citizens be subjected to indefinite detention without trial among his other orders, (including bombing Libya without consulting congress)pretty much sealed it for me. His efforts to divide the country via race and wealth wars was a favorite Hitler tactic. As for his gayness, there is a good chance the wife and sudden emergence of “girlfiends” is just more artificial cover for his obscured and sleazy past.

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      The people who cannot see that, Lucinda, are afflicted by a marvellous blindness!

  • http://www.personalliberty.com/sucks A Libertarian who will never return to this partisan joke of a website.

    Wow, as a libertarian I was excited to stumble upon this website. After scrolling down and seeing this article, I will never return.

    You don’t have to like Obama, but seriously; he isn’t gay. I thought the history of dating women or the wife and children were a dead give away,

    Furthermore, a libertarian WOULDN’T GIVE A DAMN if our leaders were gay. His body. His life. His choice. I don’t give a rats ass. I would vote for the gayest president imaginable if I thought he would fix our problems.

    Enjoy being a bunch of partisans. I will have none of it.

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      Whatever you say, POSER!!!

    • http://Google Ernst Olofsen

      I am not going to judge Obama, someone else will do that one Day, but I am very disappointed with all the news media, someone with a very distorted view on sexuality stole a beautiful Word “GAY” and now all of them call them self that, they are Homosexuals, and should be called that, look up the Dictionary and see what the Word Gay actually mean, how anyone can compare Homosexuals to being happy , joyful etc is beyond me, they should be Called Homosexuals or if you prefer the P word, and not be encouraged by showing them on TV kissing in the public, I thought Reporters was intelligent and civilised people.

  • Lucinda

    This is concerns his hidden past, not about his sexual orientation.

  • Neil Swan

    I believe Gay Marriage should be allowed and I’m not gay. I just believe in treating people like people. Most of the people making comments don’t’

    Neil

  • Damn Buster 2012

    How Nice Of our Great,Wonderful Black President (Actually he’s Half Black,and Half White)The People that took that picture of Him,should have dress him in a dapier,and put a milk bottel in his mouth,

  • David Duke

    Obomber needs to be in prison for crimes against humanity. There may barrack be gay gang raped indefently.

    • Neil Swan

      What do you consider crimes against humanity.

      Neil

      • David Duke

        Bombing civilians in Libya, Pakistan, Yemen. Extending false flag wars in Afganistan and Iraq. Shreadding the Constitution by “executive orders”.ie NDAA ect.

        • Deerinwater

          That’s the same argument Jane Fonda made.

      • Neil Swan

        The civilians bomnbed with drones were terrorist against our country.

        Neil

        • David Duke

          How are innocent women and children be terrorists?

      • Deerinwater

        he’s got his christian mojo working today!

      • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

        neil says: The civilians bomnbed with drones were terrorist against our country.

        Well which were they, neil; civilians or terrorists? I know i know, if they look Arabic, they’re terrorists, so just blast them! Yeee,,,haaaa..now that’s what i calls it, a turkey-shoot; git em Ned, i mean, mr. obamee….

      • Bert Cundle Sr.

        DEPRIVATION of RIGHTS!

        • Deerinwater

          When someone takes away your right to breath ~ give us a call.

  • Lucinda

    If 775 isn’t a huge number, than 56 is practically a fraction. That’s the number of children executed by US drones in the first 20 months of the Obama administration.http://rt.com/usa/news/drones-civilian-death-obama-187/

  • Pingback: Will the Volcker Rule Help Stabilize Banking? – Barack Obama: The First Gay President? – Stossel: Saving Endangered Species – Greek Bank Runs « CUT DC.COM

  • Richie Gekko

    The real question should be how he is only exercising for 15 minutes. Unless of course he is actually…Oh, wait.

  • Damn Buster 2012

    Shame on all you people!!!You Should know that our Wonderful,great and mighty President has everthing under control.You peopl should know better.Vote RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • jopa

    Laura Bush was the first lesbian First Lady.When she took her finger out of the Dyke, New Orleans got flooded out.

    • Brian Wilson

      My proudly painted my trash can jopa.

  • Bert Cundle Sr.

    When: G’s & L’s are compleetly in control… In 100 Years No humans will exist!

    • Deerinwater

      Then our problems will be over.

  • Humpty Dumpty

    Perhaps that’s not the only thing about Obama that needs to come out of the closet. Some stuff is going around that as a child he was an active participant in a CIA mind control program that dealt with bilocation, etc. Who knows if it is true. How can we find out? Can your investigative reporter take that on as a worthy project to inform voters about things we should know about a president whose first Presidential Executive Order mandated keeping his personal information SECRET.

    • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

      His first executive order was to make the past President’s Administration records not subject to removal from the public by the President’s or their families.

      It has nothing to do with the personal, private, non public records of before they were sworn in as President. Obama didn’t need to make his school, medical, passport, etc. records non-public because they already were.

  • Harrison Bounel

    Re: The Newsweek Cover:
    Obama is a Down-Low Bro with a Halo!

  • SketchyHawiian

    Van Jones floated the trial balloon 2 months ago suggesting that even if Obama were to announce that he was gay, the black community would still vote for him. I found this odd since several people over the years such as Larry Sinclair and the mother of the late Donald Young from Obama’s Church have previously made that very claim regarding Obama being a closeted gay man. Can we anticipate Obama having a “McGreevy Moment” and announcing to the world that he is gay?

  • CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

    WHETHER OR NOT Barack Hussein Obama IS HOMOSEXUAL, I DO NOT CARE. I ONLY WISH HE WAS ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT CAUCASIAN.

    CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

    • Robert Smith

      From Christopher: “. I ONLY WISH HE WAS ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT CAUCASIAN. ”

      Ohhhhhhh, you represent the Master Race so well, Christopher.

      Rob

      • Deerinwater

        Hmm? Well Sir, I respect your honesty much more then theses lying sons of a beaches.

        I wish he’d been a lighter shade myself and maybe we could have avoided all this nonsense, dealing with all the lying and false pretense.

        Obama was the better of the two opinions in spite of the “tan”. I wished it’d had been differently. It was a bad time to fight yet another superfluous battle .

        But I look on the sunny side, a certain degree of desensitizing of race has occurred in America in spite of some peoples protest and opposition. It was a high water bench mark. All of America is not cosmopolitan or bearing the leading edge to the future but steeped in the past with roots that go deep. We need all of Americans, we can’t be Americans by accepting some of us while rejecting some of us. That is not what America and being American was ever about.

        It’s my personal belief is, a person should be judges by his words and deeds and not by where he came from or pedigree. This is something special that America offered the world.

        But you need to understand Obama was elected president in spite of his race and not because of his race. Yet I know, many will refuse to see it that way.

        I’m very please with Obama’s administration performance on many issues to date~ with some exception of course. While I* do wish he had been offered more “worthy” opposition, opposition not found rooted in racism compounded by the normal political bias we all have grown to know so well.

        Today the choice is simple, 4 more for 44 or 8 for the elitist and corporate America.

        A no brainier ~ from where I stand.

        • dalene44

          A pity that obama and his corrupt masters chose to exploit his African American heritage rather than using his mixed background to unite the country. Instead they have chosen to race bait and exploit everyone’s fear of being called racist by accusing those who object to obama’s indefinite detention for US citizens and destruction of the economy as racist. Have you seen this administration’s definition of potential terrorists? I hope you aren’t a lover of liberty…or else.

          • Deerinwater

            dalene44, no I have not but I will look it up. ~ “The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is suspicious of you. Yes, you Mr. and Mrs. All-American Apple Pie, are a “potential terrorist” according to the FBI.” ~ Hmm? I see what you mean. I guess you understand that this is blogs and “commentary” a persons opinion. There is several pages of them here, all suggesting much the same thing, persecution via enforcement profiling.

            Well? after the shooting of Congressperson Gifford, the killing of 6, (including children) and the wounding of 13, the killing of Dr. George Tiller and Dr. John Bayard Britton. Then Anders Behring Breivik killing 77 people in Norway (many being children) “all acts” predicated on their “RIGHT Leaning” political views, I would think “the far right” might expect some “bad press” dalene44.

            This does not take into account , all the constant veiled and not so veiled threats and sabotage, brake lines and natural gas lines cut that happen daily which leading straight to people marching under a banner of personal freedom and liberty doorstep.

            It would seem that the extreme far right was wanting some attention, it would appear they have got it. Now what are they to do with it ,~ claim they are victims and are being singled out, ~ while it is they that have singled themselves out with their actions?

            You are left to claim is was not you while your openly admit that you are sympathetic to their views and some even defend their actions.

            In as far as levying the charge of “Race baiting” goes, ~ I would need specifics to address it, while the charge is easy enough to make. Please offer me something that I can research and address directly.

            It is true, Obama is of mixed race, I do not think that he requires constant reminding yet that seems to be what happens daily. Can anyone explain why that is? Does anyone believe for one minute that he has forgotten?

        • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

          Very well stated, Deer.

      • CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

        “Deerinwater,” THE MAJOR PROBLEM WITH Senator John McCain WAS HIS AGE. FROM NOW ON, ALL PRESIDENTS WILL BE INAUGURATED UNDER THE AGE OF FIFTY (PREFERABLY, NO OLDER THAN FORTY-EIGHT).

        CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

        • Deerinwater

          Hmm? ~ Well the older our President might be, the greater consideration of a strong VP selection , ~and there again McSame failed miserably.

          • 4loveofcountry

            Nominating Sarah Palin was the best decision he ever made for the USA.

          • Deerinwater

            Clearly your thoughts are not shared by all as to Palins ability to lead.

          • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

            You are absolutely correct. Without Palin, McCain could have been elected President. With Palin he didn’t stand a chance of winning.

          • 4LoveOfGod&Country

            Really, tigeer? Are you happy with the current Occupier of our White House?

        • terris

          One of the problems with McCain was that thr economu was npt his srong suit. Another problem was in debates. Obama kha plans anf John McCain just kept saying that he had betterr plans but he never told us what they were. Except for quickly growimg health program.McCein suggested that there berefunds during the tax season. That will not do one bit of good if you are not able to afford it in the first place

      • CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

        “Deerinwater,”

        I WAS TRYING NOT TO MENTION, Governor Sarah Palin, BUT YOU ARE RIGHT. HOPEFULLY, SHE WILL NOT RUN IN 2016. IF Hillary IS HER COMPETITION, I WILL STAY HOME ON ELECTION DAY.

        CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

        • 4loveofcountry

          yes, please do. we only want responsible adults to vote.

        • http://tlgeer.wordpress.com tlgeer

          Hillary has said repeatedly that she will not run, has no interest in running. So turn this bit of speculation off.

  • dalene44

    I guess it’s only fair that ‘radical’ environmental groups, anti war activists, and supporters of third party politicians were given equal potential terrorist status by DHS as well.
    I think you give too much credit to the right wing.
    Exploiting his (Black side) and creating division are obama’s signature diversions for incompetence. He knows it, michelle knows it, his masters know it and even his supporters know it.
    I noticed obama claimed to object to the NDAA but not only signed it but Insisted American citizens be included in the indefinite detention without trial. Quite different from his media celebrated claim to support Gay marriage as he refuses to put anything in writing.
    On a happier note, 81% of federal Nonprofit Security Grant Program was awarded to Jewsh groups.

  • CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

    THE TIME HAS COME FOR ME TO MAKE A STATEMENT. I AM AN ATHEISTIC-NEGRO-MALE HOMOSEXUAL WHO SUPPORTS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. I DO NOT WANT HOMOSEXUALITY LEGALIZED. WE LIVE IN A HETEROSEXUAL COUNTRY. PERIOD. IT BOTHERS ME G-R-E-A-T-L-Y WHEN “gays” TRY TO “LATCH-ON” TO THE “COAT-TAILS” OF THE NEGRO-CIVIL-RIGHTS MOVEMENT.

    SINCE THIS IS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN SITE – FULL OF CAUCASIANS – IT WOULD BE HYPOCRITICAL OF ME TO PARTICIPATE ON THIS SITE AND DISCUSS A Newsweek COVER DEPICTING A “COLORED” MALE AS HOMOSEXUAL. NO – I DO NOT LIKE THIS PRESIDENT, AT ALL. PERIOD. ALL LEADERS – NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL – SHOULD BE CAUCASIAN MALES.

    ANYWAY, I WANTED TO MAKE THE DISCLOSURE.

    CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HORTON

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.