President Golf

Thousands of Hispanics a day — mostly children — are swarming across the Southern U.S. border, overwhelming the system and creating a refugee nightmare. An Islamic horde called the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) — so evil that even al-Qaida has distanced itself from the group — is cutting a swath of terror and vicious, brutal mayhem across Iraq, using American weapons supplied to al-Qaida in Syria or left in Iraq following the U.S pullout and/or given to the Iraqi military. Russia and the U.S. are each posturing and prodding each other as if on the brink of war. The U.S. economy is in shambles.

So President Barack Obama shuffles off to vacation, play a round or two of golf at exclusive clubs only the 1 percent can afford, and raise money for the Democrat National Committee.

I often marvel as many conservatives see the country burning down around them and say things like, “Obama is an idiot,” “He’s clueless,” “Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing,” etc. Does a person, even an incompetent one, just walk away from his job as things are falling apart?

No. One walks away when his work is done. He vacations when he is finished with the task and is waiting to see it come to fruition.

Obama’s actions — golfing as the world burns — are those of a man who feels his work is done. Obama has set things in motion for the final collapse. His handlers must be proud. He knows what he’s doing, and he’s done it well.

He’s earned that round of golf. After all, intentionally transforming a country into a Third World backwater is tough work. Destroying the world is harder still.

Now Government’s Harassing Americans Who Signed Up For Obamacare

The Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, remains one big mess. Now the Barack Obama Administration is harassing hundreds of thousands of those who have signed up for the world’s biggest boondoggle, seeking verification of eligibility for subsidies they were initially told they were eligible to receive.

The documents requested include birth certificates, Social Security cards, high school diplomas, driver’s licenses, pay stubs and voter registration cards.

According to the notice being mailed to one-quarter of the 8 million people who signed up for Obamacare coverage, the personal information they reported does not match up with data in government records. Failure to provide additional documents to verify income, citizenship, immigration status and Social Security numbers and information on the coverage available through their employer could result in the loss of coverage or subsidies.

Many Obamacare recipients say they had already submitted the verifying documents. They wonder why they’re being required to submit them again. The London, Ky., firm tasked with linking the documents to applications, Serco, admits there is a problem because a promised system allowing the scanning of documents was never finished. Serco said its employees were then tasked with inputting the information manually, making a task expected to take five minutes actually take an hour. A Serco spokesman said technical problems with have made it difficult to investigate discrepancies.

Recall that while the website was foundering for the first six months after going live, the Administration was encouraging people to sign up and promising subsidies based on faith alone. In March, Obama told a Hispanic audience via a town hall with Telemundo and Univision that even though the law was written to exclude illegals, no information on legal status would be submitted to immigration services; and he encouraged families of illegals to sign up.

What this means is many Americans may see their coverage dropped, or they will have to repay their subsidy next April even though they applied in good faith and were told by the government they were eligible. Meanwhile, any illegals who signed up will not have their eligibility questioned based on their legal status.

The re-verification process is ripe for fraud, as scammers will be able to duplicate the government’s information request forms, enabling them to steal the identities of thousands of Obamacare signees. Of course, in the beginning didn’t have any encryption and Obamacare exchanges were hiring criminals as navigators.

Remember what I’ve told you many times: Obamacare has nothing to do with healthcare. It’s a big-government boondoggle designed to transfer wealth, further enrich the medical-pharmaceutical-health insurance complex, limit choices and steal away medical freedom.

It will put people’s health in the hands of mind-numbed bureaucrats and automaton state doctors who march in lockstep to the collectivist system upon which their livelihood depends. And the system, based on fraud, is ripe for more.

Understanding Iraq


Commenting on Lawmakers Scramble To Make Sense Of Iraq Crisis,
Douglas Kelly says:
June 12, 2014
To understand the situation in the Middle East, one must understand the history of Islam. It’s all quite clear and understandable when one knows the real difference between the Shi’ite and Sunni sects. The situation everyone is raving about is strictly between these two waring sects. It’s not about America, nor does America have any reason or business to be involved. Anyone with an iota of knowledge of their history would realize this.

If we only had people in government who understood this rather than loud mouth fools like John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the rest of the neocons, we would not be acting as though this is of any consequence to the US.

It’s not about the oil, but that’s what some would like you to believe. Our need for oil is not a problem that our esteemed President cannot solve with the stroke of his famous pen. By simply opening up land for drilling, allowing off-shore drilling and the Bakkan, we can increase our domestic production to the extent we’d be a net exporter of oil. OPEC would crumble for lack of its greatest market.

But mainly and better is that we would not be in another foreign war that will, as usual, drag on for decades using taxpayer money and our military’s lives for nothing. We don’t have to do this, you know.




Commenting on You Posted My REAL NAME,
Average Joe56 says:
June 9, 2014
LMAO…. You have to wonder sometimes, whether these people have ever posted anywhere…ever. Someone had better get working on artificial intelligence real quick….natural stupidity is gaining a serious foothold.

Thanks for the morning chuckle, Bob!



Further Proof The Establishment Still Doesn’t Get The Tea Party

Dave Brat’s historic upset of conservative-in-name-only (CINO) pro-amnesty Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor not only made the GOP establishment go temporarily insane, it showed, once again, that even after seven years, the Washington elites still have no concept of what the Tea Party really is.

One would think that a conservative publication like The Washington Examiner would have at least an inkling of an idea. But in his post-mortem of Cantor’s stunning defeat, The Examiner’s T. Beckett Adams showed that Washington, D.C., is so insular and so insulated that it is completely clueless about what is happening in America.

Exercising doublethink only a propagandist for the GOP establishment could employ, Adams wrote that Brat was a Tea Party candidate without Tea Party support who won because of a “strong, personalized ground game.” The Tea Party, Adams writes, “had nothing to do with Cantor’s defeat.”

Adams could not be more wrong. While it’s true that so-called Tea Party organizations like Club for Growth, Freedom Works and Tea Party Patriots sat on the sidelines in the Brat/Cantor Virginia primary, the real Tea Party was hard at work.

The idea of using the Boston Tea Party as the backdrop for a movement against ever-expanding government got its start in 2007 as a money bomb for Ron Paul on the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. Held on December 16, it was dubbed Boston Tea Party 07.

Two years later, from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Rick Santelli made a famous nationally televised rant against bailouts for underwater homeowners on February 19, 2009.

That week in February, President Barack Obama was busy crossing the country stumping for Federal bailouts and “stimulus” programs. Americans, fed up with both Republicans and Democrats and their bailouts for the crony corporations and banksters, began staging “raucous grassroots rebellions against Beltway spending binges,” as Michelle Malkin wrote at the time. “The new Boston Tea Party is here, baby,” she proclaimed.

No one covered and promoted the local grassroots, mom-and pop-inspired protests more than Malkin. In her column, Rebel yell: Taxpayers revolt against gimme-mania, she wrote:

The first revolt took place on President’s Day in Smurf-blue Seattle, where mom-blogger Keli Carender hastily organized a downtown demonstration to oppose what they called the “stimulus rip-off.” A motley band of nearly 100 protesters — moms and their kids, college students, libertarians, taxpayer groups, GOP activists — raised their voices and dined on pulled pork (donated by yours truly). They assailed both the substance of the overstuffed stimulus package and the short-circuited, non-transparent process by which it was passed.

Some wore pig noses. Others waved Old Glory and “Don’t Tread on Me” flags. Their handmade signs read: “Say No to Generational Theft;” “Obama’$ Porkulu$ Wear$ Lip$tick;” and “I don’t want to pay for the SwindleUs! I’m only 10 years old!” The event was peaceful, save for an unhinged city-dweller who showed his tolerance by barging onto the speakers’ stage and giving a Nazi salute.

Carender, a newcomer to political activism, shared advice for other first-timers: “Basically everyone, you just have to do it. Call up your police station or parks department and ask how you can obtain a permit, and then just start advertising. The word will spread. I am only one person, but with a little hard work this protest has become the efforts of a lot of people.”

Why bother? It’s for posterity’s sake. For the historical record. And, hopefully, it will spur others to move from the phones and computers to the streets. For Carender, it’s just the beginning. She gathered all the attendees’ e-mail addresses and will keep up the pressure.

Similar protests, often promoted by local conservative talk radio stations and hosts, began springing up in cities and towns across the nation. Those people and groups weren’t the hated Koch brothers, nor were they inspired or funded by them, despite what the Washington establishment and their propagandists in mainstream media have told you. Many, if not most of those attending Tea Party gatherings, had never even heard of the Koch brothers.

These were owners of small businesses, homemakers, blue collar workers, college students, retirees and veterans who were uniting for a common purpose: To oppose big government, bailouts and increased taxes. The Tea in their adopted name was an acronym for taxed enough already.

The national Tea Party organizations sprang up in the aftermath of those grassroots protests when it became obvious the movement was taking off. While they share some ideas with the local groups—or at least claim to—they have little else in common with them. For instance, both Club for Growth and Freedom Works long ago promised to sit out the immigration battle. Yet Cantor’s pro-amnesty stance is one of the main factors in his defeat. Local Tea Party groups—and most conservatives and rank and file Republicans—staunchly oppose amnesty.

In Alabama’s June 2 primary for the State’s 6th Congressional District— which National Review declared the most important race in the country — national Tea Party groups sponsored and threw hundreds of thousands of dollars at a candidate: physician Chad Mathis. Mathis, a recent transplant to Alabama, had no ties to the State, was a poor public speaker, and in debates, he demonstrated no personality and little grasp of policy.

Local Tea Party groups backed State Senator Scott Beason, a longtime thorn in the side of the State’s Republican establishment who had advocated for pro-gun legislation and led a fight against Common Core.

Despite the heavy spending on mostly negative attack ads, Mathis finished fourth in the seven-man race. Beason, running an underfunded grassroots campaign in which he was outspent by four other candidates than nine to one each, finished third, narrowly missing the two-man runoff. Had he the funding poured into Mathis’ campaign, he likely would have led the field. He at least would have been in the runoff facing one of the two who finished ahead of him: the establishment, business-backed candidate or the policy wonk.

The national Tea party organizations are infiltrated with members of the GOP establishment and they represent various establishment wings. They are typically a little more conservative than, say, John McCain and his lapdog Lindsey Graham. But they aren’t necessarily representative of the grassroots and they are beholden to K-Street and crony corporations for funding—hence their decision to sit out the immigration debate being pushed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The national media were premature in announcing the demise of the Tea Party last month after some of the candidates they backed lost their elections.

Despite the defeats, and many others that are sure to come, the Tea Party is far from dead. Otherwise, why would establishment warmongers like Representative Peter King (Sourpuss-N.Y.) lament in the aftermath of Cantor’s defeat that he wondered whether the GOP was crumbling as a whole. “I don’t know where we go now as a party,” he said in an interview. “I’m very concerned that we may go all the way to the right.”

That’s the point: Many real Tea Partiers hope the GOP moves “all the way to the right” or crumbles altogether.

The GOP, a party of mercantilism since its inception, has been gradually moving left for more than 100 years. It’s going to take more than seven years to move it far enough right to make it a party of the Constitution. The Tea Party is not an organization. It is an idea—a movement—and rumors of its impending demise are exaggerated. The GOP establishment would do well to figure that out sooner rather than later.

America Being Transformed Before Our Eyes

Ninety-two million Americans aren’t working.

Vice President Joe Biden says the U.S. needs a “constant, unrelenting stream” of new immigrants — “not dribbling [but] significant flows.”

The labor participation rate is at 62.8 percent, the lowest it’s been in almost 50 years.

President Barack Obama told Democratic donors “our future rests” on the success of people brought to the U.S. illegally as children. “So these young people are graduating, ready to go to college, but also certified nurses, EMT folks.”

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were essentially no new jobs created in May for those “young people [who] are graduating.” There were 700 fewer jobs for lawyers over the previous month. There were only 4,100 new jobs for accountants or bookkeepers; 4,500 new architect and engineer jobs (a number that includes secretaries and office managers); 1,800 new jobs in management; and almost 12,000 fewer education jobs. In fact, there are no more jobs now than there were six years ago.

Illegals are flooding across the southern border at an unprecedented rate. Estimates now put the number of illegal children crossing into the U.S. without their parents — and being granted blanket amnesty by Obama’s executive order — at 90,000 for the year. The average before this year was 6,500.

Biden says that a steady, unrelenting stream if illegals would allow the Nation’s gross domestic product numbers to hike by 5.4 percent, or $1.4 trillion, over the next two decades, Newsmax reported. Simultaneously, he predicted that the deficit would drop by $850 billion.

Biden’s unrelenting stream is underway, thanks to Obama’s policies. There are currently no jobs for Americans. There are no jobs for illegals, either.

What are these people smoking?

Our borders are now being controlled by the Mexican drug cartels. With border stations swamped, illegals are being shipped across the country, given a court date and set free. The kids are carrying all manner of Third World diseases.

There is a refugee crisis in Texas. It’s a crisis of Obama’s making, and it’s intentional.

America is being transformed before our eyes.

Why Does Obama Want New Graduates In Perpetual Debt?

President Barack Obama signed an executive order that lets borrowers pay no more than 10 percent of their monthly income in student loan payments. The measure, according to media reports, expands on a 2010 law that covered those who started borrowing after October 2007 and kept borrowing after 2011. The new order allows those who borrowed earlier to participate.

Now, almost three of every four college graduates leave college heavily in debt. As Paul Craig Roberts reported Tuesday, 260,000 college graduates were employed at or below the Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour as of March 31. The latest jobs report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that job prospects for graduates were dismal.

In its phony statistics, the BLS claimed 217,000 jobs were created in May. Of those, most were in wholesale trade, retail clerks, transportation and warehousing, employment services and temporary help, wait staff and bartenders, and healthcare and social assistance, with healthcare and social assistance providing the most. These are not the jobs for which people go to school.

Almost 3 million people are graduating with either an associate’s degree or a bachelor’s degree this year. They are beginning to flood the market looking for work. And as they do, they’re saddled with an average of $30,000 in student-loan debt.

Most of those who graduated last year are either unemployed or underemployed. In other words, they’re holding a job that did not require a bachelor’s degree. Their prospects for a good job are akin to playing the lottery.

In May, there were 700 fewer jobs for lawyers over the previous month. There were only 4,100 new jobs for accountants or bookkeepers; 4,500 new architect and engineer jobs (a number that includes secretaries and office managers); 1,800 new jobs in management; and almost 12,000 fewer education jobs.

Government guaranteed loans made it possible for many who couldn’t otherwise afford it to attend prestigious universities. That influx of easy money from the government drove up the costs of tuition across the board, making it impossible for anyone but the very rich to afford college without first obtaining a student loan. As is usual in government meddling, it’s created a vicious cycle of easy money chasing higher prices.

But the result is students are saddled with burdensome debt — debt they cannot absolve themselves of through good-paying jobs or through bankruptcy. And now Obama’s policies are encouraging more students to take on more debt because they can now kick the payment down road. The policy simply creates more debt slaves.

Another Day, Another Mass Shooting

There was another mass shooting last week. I’m sure you heard about, given that it was all over the news.

A gunman entered a laundromat and opened fire, injuring at least six people. Most of the victims were young adults, but two were teenagers aged 14 and 16. The gunman was still at large. There was no word on whether he was responsible for the 30 other shootings that occurred in the same area over a three-day span that included the laundromat attack.

What? You didn’t hear about it? No. I guess not. It was ignored by the mainstream media.

Unlike the shooting in Las Vegas, the perpetrators couldn’t be tied — however loosely — to the statist’s favorite villains: the National Rifle Association, Cliven Bundy, the liberty movement or — gasp — rural white people, aka “rednecks.” And the shooting took place in another gun-free zone: Chicago, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the Nation.

So the media ignored it. After all, it’s Chicago. Gang-related. Barack Obama’s and Rahm Emanuel’s town. Where guns are outlawed, so only the outlaws have guns.

Another day, another gangland shooting. That doesn’t fit their agenda, so you don’t need to hear about it.

Natural Cold And Cough Remedies Provide Chemical-Free Relief

Spring has sprung out all over, and with it comes allergy symptoms. But don’t reach for over-the-counter medicines for relief. Try the natural way.

These herbs provide safe relief without the harmful chemicals and side effects:

  • Goldenseal, peppermint and echinacea: Decongest sinuses, improve circulation and support the immune and lymphatic systems.
  • Chamomile: Has anti-inflammatory properties that offer relief to dry, itchy eyes. Place cool, wet chamomile tea bags over your eyes and leave them there for several minutes.
  • Stinging nettle: Works as an antihistamine, targeting the immune system’s response to allergens. It helps to reduce allergy symptoms like itchy eyes and sneezing. The dose should be 300 mg to 500 mg per day of stinging nettle in capsule form. You can also drink tea made from the plant’s fresh or freeze-dried leaves.
  • Thyme: Acts as both an antimicrobial and an expectorant; 1 or 2 teaspoons will help soothe sore throats and quell coughs.
  • Honey: Boosts the immune system and is a treatment for sore throats and coughs. It can be combined with thyme to double the effectiveness of the two ingredients.
  • Ginger: Helps to clear the throat and open the sinuses. It can be used in a soothing tea and/or mixed with honey. Mix 1 or 2 teaspoons of dried ginger — or minced ginger, if fresh — into hot water and let it steep. Inhale the vapors for a couple of minutes, then drink it for relief.
  • Cayenne pepper: Eases sore throat pain and prevents the release of histamines. Sprinkle a couple of shakes of cayenne powder in water and gargle with it two or three times a day.
  • Herbal inhalation: In a bowl, mix 3 teaspoons each of peppermint, thyme and nasturtium in 2.5 pints of boiling water and let stand for five minutes. Lean your head over the bowl, cover with a towel and inhale the aroma for about 10 minutes or until you feel your nose and chest clearing. Repeat two or three times per day.

H/T: Natural Society

California Bill Would Make All Sex Rape Without Prior Verbal Consent

If a California Democrat has his way, “yes” will mean “yes” only if both parties say “yes” out loud before sex.

A bill has been proposed that requires California colleges and universities to adopt policies concerning campus sexual violence, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking policies containing an “affirmative consent” policy in order to receive State funds for financial assistance.

In other words, all sex on campus would be treated as sexual assault unless a conversation about the act occurred beforehand, and the couple demonstrates they obtained “affirmative consent” before engaging in sexual activity. The bill describes “affirmative consent” as an “affirmative and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity.”

The bill states the consent must be “informed, freely given, and voluntary,” and, “It is the responsibility of the person initiating the sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the consent of the other person to engage in the sexual activity. Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent.” The bill also states that the existence of prior sexual relationship or dating relationship could not be assumed as an indicator of consent.

Writing for Legal Insurrection, attorney Hans Bader says, “Since most couples have engaged in sex without “verbal” consent, supporters of the bill are effectively redefining most people, and most happily-married couples, as rapists. By demanding verbal discussion before sex, they are also meddling in people’s sex lives in a prurient fashion. (Whether consent is explicit is often inversely related to whether sex is really welcome, with grudgingly consensual acts often being preceded by more explicit discussion and haggling than acts that are truly welcomed and enjoyed… Disturbingly, it’s not just sex they want to regulate, but also ‘sexual activity’ in general. The bill may require affirmative consent before multiple steps in the process of foreplay that leads to sex, even between couples who have engaged in the same pattern of foreplay before on countless occasions.”

Bader notes that requiring people to have verbal discussions before sex violates their privacy rights under at least two Supreme Court decisions, and also would ban foreplay as commonly occurs among married and unmarried couples alike.

But wait! I thought it was only conservatives who wanted to get into everyone’s bedrooms.


You Posted My REAL NAME!!!

You idiots!!! I just posted a comment against gun background checks, and before I realized it, you posted it under my REAL name, and my Facebook page, without giving me a chance to delete the post!!!

Are you people complete idiots? WHY would you think I would want to post something under my real nema on such a touchy subject, AND to have it linked to my Facebook page, which is my professional page? (I am a motion picture actor.) In Hollywood, anti-gun posts can get you fired from movies, or cause you to lose roles that you apply for. 

I want you to DELETE the post I made, and REMOVE it from my Facebook page. I also want you to make it possible for people to post under a pseudonym. 

We live in insane times, and there are some crazies out there. My post referenced those crazies. Might it not cross your mind that perhaps ONE of those crazies might take offense to what I posted, and perhaps want to hunt me down and cause me great injury or death? 

I can’t believe you people ever graduated from High School. 


Dear G.H.

You need to direct your ire inward. It is quite clear when you begin to make a comment under “Facebook Conversations” that the system is pulling in your Facebook profile. Your selected Facebook image even appears at the left side of the comment box. At that time, you are given the opportunity to log out, though you cannot post via Facebook once you do.

If you wish to comment anonymously you have the option of creating a Disqus profile with the pseudonym of your choice.

This begs the question: Are you sure you ever graduated from high school?

Best wishes,

P.S. The moderator has removed your comment. All you had to do was ask. The insults weren’t necessary.

The Case For Obama’s Impeachment

There is clear and convincing evidence that President Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason and high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.

The “crimes” that led to the impeachment of both Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton and the resignation of Richard Nixon pale in comparison to Obama’s. Johnson’s “crimes” were purely political. He favored a policy of benevolent reconciliation with the Southern States following the Civil War. He issued a series of proclamations that directed the Southern States to hold conventions and elections to reform their governments; he attempted to veto a number of bills establishing military districts to oversee the new State governments; he vetoed an incumbent protection act called the Tenure of Office Act; and he fired Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, who was working against him at every turn. Those moves were all contrary to the wishes of the Republicans who controlled both houses of Congress in the aftermath of the war. The impeachment vote in the Senate failed by one vote on all three counts to receive the two-thirds majority necessary to remove Johnson from office.

Clinton was impeached for perjury to a grand jury and obstruction of justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit and the related independent counsel’s investigation in the Monica Lewinsky affair and various other Clinton misdeeds. Forty-five Senators—all of them Republican—voted to remove Clinton from office over the perjury charge. Fifty voted to remove him for obstruction of justice. Though Clinton was clearly guilty, not one Democrat in the Senate voted to impeach. And, in fact, the Senate voted 100-0 to not hear any live witnesses in the trial.

Nixon, of course, resigned a couple of weeks after the House opened its impeachment hearings over his role in the cover-up of the Watergate break-in and other allegations of his misuse of office, the facts of which were just coming to light at the time.

The “I-word” hit the mainstream media after war-loving, chicken hawk and John McCain-lapdog Senator Lindsey Graham warned Obama that Republicans would call for his impeachment if he released more prisoners from Guantanamo Bay without Congressional approval. Before that, anyone mentioning impeachment was shouted down and cast by the media and the establishment as nutty, kooky or… wait for it… a conspiracy theorist. Obama responded to Graham’s threat by having his underlings release news that another Gitmo prisoner may soon be sprung.

I am under no illusion that the impeachment proceedings are in the offing, regardless of what Obama does. Neither is Obama. Graham’s threat was as idle as an inattentive parent’s threat to a misbehaving child. When you hear a parent tell his child “No” over and over, and then hear him say, “You do that once more and you’re in trouble,” you know that child is never disciplined — and the child knows it, too. This is Congress and Obama.

Neither Republicans nor Democrats in Washington, D.C., are interested in anything other paying lip service to the Constitution while solidifying their respective grips on power and transferring America’s wealth to their favored crony partners. That is all that matters in D.C. Neither party will intentionally do anything to upset their cushy apple cart.

And the MSM, which long ago abandoned any pretense at objective journalism, are beholden to the elites and in the tank for the regime, drunk as they are on being next to the power structure. You can’t expect real journalism with a lineup like this:

  • ABC Senior Correspondent Claire Shipman is married to outgoing White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.
  • CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.
  • CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of top Obama official Ben Rhodes, who is responsible for rewriting the Benghazi talking points.
  • ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama special adviser Elizabeth Sherwood.

However, six years of this lawless regime is more than any sane person should be expected to endure. Even leftist legal scholar Jonathan Turley called Obama “the president Richard Nixon always wanted to be.”

So here are my articles of impeachment — in no particular order — for the undocumented usurper currently despoiling the People’s House: Barack Hussein Obama.

  • He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by releasing five suspected terrorists and former members of the Taliban who participated in or orchestrated attacks against Americans.
  • He violated a law he signed six months prior requiring him to notify Congress 30 days before releasing GITMO detainees.
  • He has willfully and repeated violated Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution by continuously amending the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.
  • He knowingly and willfully violated Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution by signing the ACA, knowing full well it was a bill for raising revenue that had originated in the Senate.
  • He engaged in fraud by repeatedly lying to the American people about the effects of the ACA by claiming that Americans could keep their current coverage and physicians if they chose.
  • He exercised an abuse of power by instructing, through his proxies, agents of the Internal Revenue Service to target conservative organizations and his critics for extra scrutiny and audits.
  • He participated in an obstruction of justice and a criminal conspiracy by hindering a Congressional investigation into the Internal Revenue Service targeting scandal and using Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice in that obstruction.
  • He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by ordering or allowing the sale of arms and ammunition to al-Qaida-linked terrorists in Syria and by dispatching agents of the government to advise and train in the use of the those weapons and in military tactics.
  • He failed, despite repeated requests by the U.S. Consulate, to provide the security necessary to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel and the Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
  • He knowingly and willfully denied military assistance to Americans under attack at the Benghazi Consulate, resulting in the trashing of the U.S. Consulate building, the theft of sensitive documents and the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.
  • He knowingly and willfully lied and ordered his proxies to lie about the circumstances surrounding the attack on the U.S Consulate in Benghazi, thereby perpetrating a fraud on the American people in order to ensure his re-election and to cover up his illegal gun running operation.
  • He violated the War Powers Act by failing to gain Congressional approval for the military attack on Libya that resulted in the overthrow of the Libyan regime.
  • He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by using the American military and intelligence organizations and allowing the sale of arms and ammunition to al-Qaida-linked terrorists in order to assist them in overthrowing a legal regime in Libya that Congress had not declared war upon.
  • He has repeatedly made war on various Middle Eastern countries with the use of drone attacks without the approval of Congress in violation of the War Powers Act and in violation of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
  • He has ordered the murders of at least three American citizens without due process in violation of Amendments 5, 6, 8 and 14.
  • He has repeatedly used the Environmental Protection Agency to contravene Congress and pass laws harmful to American businesses and consumers, in violation of Article I, Section 1.
  • He has repeatedly violated the 4th Amendment by allowing agencies under his direction to continue to spy upon, wiretap and collect personal information of American citizens who are not criminal suspects.
  • He has repeatedly violated Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution by disregarding laws passed by Congress, including, but not limited to, U.S. immigration laws, civil rights laws and the Defense of Marriage Act.
  • He knowingly allowed the illegal sale of weapons to Mexican narco-terrorists that were later used to kill Americans, including border agent Brian Terry.
  • He obstructed justice by participating with Attorney General Holder in a cover-up of the Fast and Furious gun running scheme.
  • He knowingly and willfully violated Article IV, Section 4 by failing to protect the border States against invasion, and in fact encouraged that invasion through his rhetoric and with the use of executive orders that contravened U.S. immigration law.
  • He knowingly and willfully violated Article IV, Section 4 (guaranteeing a republican form of government to each State) by strong-arming, intimidating and threatening to withhold funds from the States of Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, Rhode Island and Arizona in order to coerce the people and legislatures of those States and prevent the passage of laws according to the citizen’s wishes.
  • He instructed his Interior Secretary to ignore the orders of Federal courts to lift a moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, which denied oil workers an opportunity to earn a living and damaged the U.S. economy.
  • He broke established precedent and contravened established bankruptcy law, to the detriment of the bond holders and the advantage of his campaign contributors (auto unions) in the General Motors bailout.
  • In the auto bailout, he knowingly and willfully deprived numerous auto dealers of their dealerships for political reasons in violation of Amendments 4 and 14.
  • He repeatedly transferred funds from the U.S. Treasury to his cronies and campaign contributors for use in failing green energy schemes.
  • He violated Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution by appointing officers without first obtaining the “Advice and Consent of the Senate.”

In his book Faithless Execution, Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment, Andrew C. McCarthy notes: “Impeachment is a grave remedy on the order of a nuclear strike.” Obama’s lawless Presidency has been nothing less than a nuclear strike on the U.S. Constitution, which now lies in tatters.

“Impeachment is a political remedy: even if palpably guilty of profound transgressions, a president will not be ousted without a groundswell of public ire,” McCarthy writes.

In his case for impeachment, McCarthy breaks Obama’s high crimes and misdemeanors into seven articles. They are:

  • Article I: The President’s willful refusal to execute the laws faithfully and usurpation of the legislative authority of Congress.
  • Article II: Usurping the Constitutional authority and prerogatives of Congress.
  • Article III: Dereliction of Duty as President and Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • Article IV: Fraud on the American People.
  • Article V: Failure to execute the Immigration Laws faithfully.
  • Article VI: Failure to execute the laws faithfully: Department of Justice.
  • Article VII: Willfully undermining the Constitutional rights of the American people that he is sworn to preserve, protect and defend.

Those articles contain many of the charges laid out above. But they also include Obama’s defiance of Congressional law and court orders in obstructing the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project, his defiance of Federal law requiring him to address Medicare insolvency, his undermining of and contempt for Congress’ duty to conduct oversight of Federal agencies, his dereliction of duty by imposing unconscionable rules of engagement that endanger American troops, lying about Iran negotiations and assisting that country with its nuclear program, politicization of the DoJ, politically motivated selective prosecution by the DoJ, DoJ investigations and other intimidation of journalists in violation of Amendment 1, systematic stonewalling of Congress, abridgement of Amendment 1 in appeasing Islamic supremacists by adopting repressive sharia blasphemy standards, suppression of information about Islamic terrorism, including its occurrence at Ft. Hood, abridgement of Amendment 1 by vindictively targeting and prosecuting high-profile critics, and his abridgement of Amendment 2 by joining an international treaty despite Congressional opposition.

McCarthy notes that since impeachment is a political rather than a legal remedy, the burden of proof is different. But he also states that as long as there is no groundswell of opposition to the President’s actions from the public, there will be no impeachment.

I’ll go one step further: As long as there is not a two-thirds majority of Republicans in the Senate, there will be no impeachment. But even in the off chance that Republicans were to somehow come up with 66 Senators willing to remove the President, the Republicans would not have the stomach to attempt it because the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll.

The ensuing carnage would likely result in the removal of the entire power structure in Washington. And the establishment — whether it sides with the Democrats or Republicans — will agree it can’t have that.

Update: In the wake of the growing chorus of calls for Obama’s impeachment, the GOP establishment has publicly announced it cares more for power than the Constitution.

Obama’s Refugee Crisis

President Barack Obama’s dismissal and violation of U.S. immigration laws has created a refugee crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Yesterday, released leaked images of illegal immigrants warehoused in overcrowded conditions in Texas. Most of them are unaccompanied children — including girls under the age of 12 — who have crossed from Central America, through Mexico’s drug cartel-controlled territories and into Texas.

U.S. Immigration and Customers Enforcement is being overwhelmed, and this falls at Obama’s feet because of his decision to halt deportations of young adult illegals. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program allows immigrants who arrive prior to age 16 to remain in the U.S. This includes anyone 30 or younger on June 15, 2012. These so-called “Dreamers” are being approved at a rate of 96 percent of all immigrants who apply.

Department of Homeland Security announced yesterday the program — which was to have lasted two years — was being renewed. This will allow 560,000 young adult and children illegals to remain in the U.S. with no fear of deportation.

The prospect of gaining legal status through this program has caused an influx of young illegals into the U.S. Of course, once those children and young adults achieve even a quasi-legal status, they will be able to bring family members across the border with them.

So far, Obama’s “fix” for the Texas disaster has been to ship masses of the illegals to other sectors in California and bus stations in Arizona where they are either sent away with “orders” to appear for a hearing at a future date, or they are just dumped at bus stations.

Scandal-Ridden Massachusetts DCF Agrees To Free Justina

The Connecticut girl kidnapped by the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families and imprisoned in Boston Children’s Hospital for more than year has been cleared to return home by the courts. But she has not yet been released, as the legal system continues to drag its feet.

Last week, Justina’s family and attorneys with the Liberty Council filed a motion in Juvenile Court requesting she be returned to her parents, Linda and Lou Pelletier. Massachusetts DCF indicated it would not object to the motion.

In mid-May, Justina was transferred from Massachusetts to a Connecticut facility. Since then, she has been receiving treatment from Tufts Medical Center, the same place she received treatment before her kidnapping by the State of Massachusetts in February 2013.

“Today is a significant event for Justina and the Pelletier family,” Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, who is representing the Pelletier family, said May 30. “We believe and hope that the Pelleteir family will soon be reunited.

“After nearly 16 months of separation, Justina requires much healing; physically, emotionally and spiritually,” said Staver. “The completion of the Plan is a very positive development and brings us almost full circle to where this process started, before DCF took custody of Justina: Tufts Medical Center is finally providing Justina’s healthcare once more.”

While under the care of her doctor at Tufts Medical Center, Justina was living a fairly normal life with her parents in West Hartford, Conn., despite suffering from mitochondrial disease, a genetic condition that has required several surgeries and continued medication prescribed by specialists. But when her parents took to her Boston Children’s to have her treated for symptoms of the flu, doctors there changed her diagnosis to somatoform disorder, took her off her medications and contacted DCF. The Pelleteirs were then escorted from the hospital.

Justina was then placed in a psychiatric ward, where she was denied medications that were working and had others forced upon her without her parents’ consent. Her health has since deteriorated to the point that she often needs a wheelchair. Her parents, meanwhile, were cast into an alternate universe for 15 months where the DCF and courts cast aspersions on their character, conspired to keep them separated from their daughter, prevented them from consulting on her care and silenced them with gag orders.

Last month, DCF head Olga Roche was forced to resign under pressure from Massachusetts legislators who expressed concern over various DCF funding misappropriation scandals involving several now dead children under the agency’s supervision, as well as its treatment of Justina.

That agency, as well as the State’s family court system and several other State agencies, are now under the gun, thanks to a trial revealing massive corruption in various State offices.

For more on the history of Justina’ plight, read Hospitals Are The New Prisons and It’s 14 Months Of Torture For Justina Pelletier.

The Two Hands Of Big Brother: Losing Our Liberties Update

I began publishing my monthly newsletter The Bob Livingston Letter™ (subscription required) in 1969. The following is an excerpt from an article in the June 1999 issue in which I commented upon the burgeoning surveillance state which even then was increasingly viewing Americans as terrorists needing to be secretly spied upon. While Edward Snowden’s “revelations” of the depth and breadth of government spying on Americans surprised many, readers of The Bob Livingston Letter™ were long ago alerted to government spying programs. And, curiously, 15 years after the fact, Attorney General Eric Holder has just announced he’s going to “revive” the same Clinton-era anti-terror task force, as if the National Security Agency’s domestic spying program is inadequate to the task.

For those who do have a mind and spirit to resist, the U.S. government has proposed creating a Soviet-like KGB within the Department of Justice, ostensibly called a “National Terrorism Intelligence Center.” You are now a terrorist, you see, if you believe in self and local governments and States’ rights. This plan was first articulated in the Council on Foreign Relations journal, Foreign Affairs, by several authors, including the former Central Intelligence Agency director and deputy secretary of defense, John Deutch, and a Harvard professor, Ashton Carter, who occupies a chair sponsored by the notorious globalist-socialist Ford Foundation. They propose a centralized intelligence gathering and collection apparatus which would coordinate all such information for “U.S. government bodies, supporting defense and intelligence operations, and law enforcement agencies.”

In short, the center would combine the active intelligence gathering approach of the national security agencies, which are not legally constrained in their forcing investigations, with the domestic authority and investigative resources of law enforcement agencies. In other words, this super-agency would have no foreign or domestic constraints for snooping on and policing the American people.

The CFR writers claim the feel-good justification of such a huge organization would be “to protect established civil liberties.” Yet this super-agency “would be exempt from pretrial discovery in the trials of indicted criminals.” Whoops! So much for those vaunted civil liberties!

How close are we to actually having a U.S. Government KGB? Attorney General Janet “Johnny Waco” Reno has announced that:

… the Clinton administration is readying a new terrorism response plan to ensure a coordinated federal effort and to practice working with state and local authorities…

… an agreement with the Pentagon, the National Security Council and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to act as the lead agency for the preparedness program.

How have we come to this point, that free Americans could be viewed as terroristic enemies in the very nation their forefathers created? Part of the answer is that America has been subjected to a long-term, clever process of demoralization and destabilization from within…

More Court-Approved Torture Coming To Georgia?

Areas of Georgia may soon join metro Atlanta and the States of Tennessee and Wyoming as places that will allow officers to forcibly withdraw blood during traffic stops.

“We’re not out here to violate anybody’s rights,” said Powell Harrelson of the Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety and Metro Police, in a classic case of political doublespeak. That office is pushing for forced blood draws if a driver refuses to submit to a field sobriety test during a traffic stop. The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled the practice lawful in January.

State and local police have already planned Operation Thunder, a summer-long activity by State Troopers and local police that will saturate certain areas of the State with traffic checkpoints and stepped-up patrols.

Chatham County judges have not decided whether they will sign off on forced blood draws. The idea has drawn the ire of lawyers who say the State can make a sufficient case with dash-cam video and field sobriety tests. Under Georgia law, refusal to take a field sobriety results in an automatic one-year driver’s license suspension.

DUI attorney Doug Andrews told a Georgia television station he is worried about unintended consequences that might spring from inserting a needle into an unwilling driver’s arm. “They’re gonna hurt someone,” he said.

And it brings to mind how things got out of hand in New Mexico, when a man was stopped for running a stop sign and police thought that during questioning he clenched his buttocks in a suspicious manner.

Fourteen hours later, without granting his consent, the man had undergone X-rays, several rectal exams and a colonoscopy as police searched for drugs that were not there.

Forced medical procedures — whether blood draws or rectal exams — are torture and have no place in American jurisprudence. They are simply more signs of the burgeoning police state.

Diet Drinks Help Weight Loss? Fat Chance!

Another day, another farcical “study” on the “benefits” of drinking diet sodas.

This one, reported on Denver’s local CBS affiliate, claims drinking diet sodas is better for losing weight than drinking water. This is “good news for diet soda lovers who also want to drop some pounds,” the reporterette breathlessly proclaimed in her report.

According to the story, researchers at the University of Colorado took 300 people and divided them into two groups. Both groups followed a “diet and exercise program,” but one could drink zero-calorie beverages while the others were restricted to drinking only water. After 12 weeks, those who drank diet beverages lost an average of 13 pounds while the water drinkers lost an average of 9.

The report itself was not included with the CBS report, but is available here.

Researchers determined that there was a reduction in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the group consuming diet beverages.

One interesting tidbit from the study, hunger increased slightly in the water group while it decreased in the diet soda group. But digging through the weeds, you find that study participants were all consumers of diet sodas prior to the study. That means the water-only group were undergoing a significantly greater lifestyle change to take part in the study.

Besides, the “study” measured weight loss only and did not take into account where the weight came from or whether the participants were healthier at the end of the study.

Diet sodas are in no way healthy, and they may be even more detrimental to health than regular sodas.

People who drink diet soda daily have a 61 percent higher risk of suffering a stroke or heart attack than those who drink no diet drinks, according to the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference. Researchers have concluded that drinking two or more sodas a day almost doubles your chances of developing kidney disease. And it’s worse for women.

The sweetener aspartame, commonly known as NutraSweet, is one of the most commonly used artificial sweeteners in diet beverages. It is a neurotoxin.

In the body it breaks down into phenylalanine, aspartic acid and methanol. When methanol is heated above 86 degrees F, it converts into formaldehyde. The human body’s resting temperature is 98.6 degrees F.

A University of Texas Health Center study found that the more diet sodas a person drank, the greater chance he had of becoming overweight. Artificial sweeteners disrupt the body’s ability to regulate calorie intake based on the sweetness of foods, according to an animal study by researchers at Purdue University.

Diet sodas are very acidic, and the acid dissolves tooth enamel, leading to tooth decay.

Oh, and buried at the bottom of CBS Denver’s story was this nugget: “The study was funded by the American Beverage Association.”

And this passes for journalism.