Democrats Are Sociopaths

Commenting on Are Democrats In A Political Party Or An Organized Crime Gang?,
Stuart Shepherd says:
April 2, 2014
what do you expect from the party that thinks it’s a good thing to be able to kill your own baby legally. You can be pretty sure that anyone or any group that is that profoundly depraved is not going to have too many qualms about racketeering! (or lying your way into office or lying while in office or betraying the american people or voter fraud or neglecting and breaking the constitution or….where do you want me to stop? the list is almost endless and completely nauseating and, in a way, terrifying. The description is that of sociopaths- that will lie, cheat, steal, or kill to have power and/or money and/or notoriety. People who will stop at nothing to achieve their narcissistic goals and for whom the end ALWAYS justifies the means and for whom the sociopathic means are also a source of pleasure because sociopaths LOVE sociopathy. It’s called evil. The gangsters LOVED being gangsters and killing people, etc. Democrats love all their sleaziness, as well, and have pulled nearly the entire country into it in one way or another, as is inevitable. Which founder said that our system of government (self rule) was only suitable for good people? Adams? Well, it’s not suitable for democrats- at least the modern ones.
Reply

FLOTUS Brainwashes The Children

On Wednesday, Michelle Obama, first lady of the United States (FLOTUS), planted her annual kitchen garden for spring. She was joined by 25 students from five local elementary schools and members of FoodCorps, a branch of AmeriCorps.

As she began her remarks, Obama proudly proclaimed that this year, the sixth year of her garden on the White House lawn, “… we’re doing [something] differently. We are going to plant something called a pollinator garden.”

“That’s great,” you say. After all, pollinators are in trouble; especially bees and monarch butterflies. And FLOTUS said as much. But it’s what she also said — and had the kids chanting — that’s the problem.

“So just for the folks at home who have not heard about a pollinator, but a pollinator garden helps to encourage the production of bees and monarch butterflies. And why do we need to do that?  You guys — just yell it out,” Obama said.

“Because they pollinate the plants,” said the students.

“They pollinate the plants, they help the plants grow,” Obama said. “But why do we need to help bees and butterflies — what’s happening to them? Yell it out. They’re dying because of disease — we don’t even know why some beehives are just totally disappearing… So we’re going to plant all kinds of flowers that attract bees and butterflies, which is not going to make the Obama girls happy because they don’t really like bees. But bees are good. Bees are a good thing. So you guys are going to help do that, and that’s the first time we’ve done a pollinator garden. Pretty cool, huh?”

Therein lies the problem, because what Obama said is a lie. And now the kids will repeat that lie and live with it.

We know what’s happening to the bees and the butterflies. They are not dying because of “disease.” They are being killed by neonicontinoids like clothianidin and thiamethoxam being used on plants to kill pests. The pesticides are absorbed by plants and transported throughout a plant’s vascular tissue, making the plant potentially toxic to insects. Neonicotinoids are chemically related to nicotine, the harmful ingredient in tobacco products.

Syngenta and Bayer are the leading manufacturers of the neonicotinoid variety of insecticides, and they claim there is no proof they are detrimental to bee health. But neonicotinoids are used on more than 100 million acres of corn, wheat, soy and cotton annually; and California beekeepers say their populations have been so decimated that many of the State’s almond growers won’t have enough bees to effectively pollinate their trees.

But it’s not just butterflies and bees that are affected. The American Bird Conservancy last year published a review of 200 studies on neonicotinoids that included industry research obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. The study calls for the banning of the insecticide based on its toxicity to birds, aquatic invertebrates and other wildlife.

Bees are essential pollinators of plants used for food and — along with butterflies, bats, beetles and some small mammals — are key components of the food system. Bee populations in China have been so decimated by the use of insecticides that farmers employ people to pollinate their almond trees. Unless and until the use of neonicotinoids and genetically modified plants is stopped, Americans will be hand pollinating its plants as well.

And consciously or not, FLOTUS is perpetuating the acceptance of pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) by brainwashing the children this way.

Privacy News

I began publishing my monthly newsletter The Bob Livingston Letter™ (subscription required) in 1969. The following is an excerpt from the April 2000 issue. While Edward Snowden’s “revelations” of the depth and breadth of government spying on Americans surprised many, readers of The  Bob Livingston Letter™ were alerted to government spying programs 14 years ago.

Clinton Budget Funds Massive Police Wiretaps: President Clinton’s proposed budget includes millions to allow government electronic snooping on civilians, and the NSA appears to be heavily involved. One of the heftiest increases, from $15 million to $240 million, will pay phone companies to rewire their networks to facilitate police wiretapping.

Half of the money ($120 million) will come from the Defense Department ‘national security’ budget, a move that alarms privacy groups. A spokesman for the American Civil Liberties Union said this, “thinly disguised intelligence agency money… confirms what we have suspected all along: The National Security Agency is a silent partner in the government’s campaign to make our entire telecommunications system, including the Net, wiretap ready.”

Source:  Wired, Feb 7.

LINK: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34164,00.html

ECHELON Revealed! (Again)

A blockbuster report on the U.S. NSA’s super secret spy system, ECHELON, was presented to the European Parliament on Feb. 22.  It confirmed that the NSA is deeply involved in the surveillance of European businesses and individuals. The report charges that all communications, including e-mail, computers, Internet, wire and cellular telephones are now spied upon by ECHELON. It also claims U.S. encryption software has been undermined by equipping nine strategic points of Internet exchanges with ECHELON detection software.

LINKS:  Newsmax

http://www.newsmax.com/commentmax/articles/Diane_Alden.shtml

Yellen At The Low-Information Crowd

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan rarely said anything intelligible. Ben Bernanke rarely said anything intelligent. Janet Yellen, on Tuesday, pandered like a politician in a room full of dependent-class voters. Since when did it become the job of the Fed Chairman to politic to the low-information crowd?

In a Chicago speech this week, Yellen lamented the plight of three people who are among the long-term unemployed. According to Yellen, the Federal Reserve needs to continue debasing the currency through profligate money printing because two ex-cons are unable to find work.

Yellen’s speech highlighted three people who “face big challenges” because the “job market is tougher now than in any recession.” Dorine Poole, who lost her job “just as the recession was starting;” Jermaine Brownlee, who “saw his wages drop sharply as he scrambled for odd jobs and temporary work;” and Vicki Lira, whose longtime job went away when a plant closed and another disappeared “when the housing market crashed” are “real people behind the statistics, struggling to get by and eager for the opportunity to build better lives.”

All were enduring long-term unemployment or suffering from being underemployed. But Yellen failed to mention several facts important to her narrative. Poole is a felon, convicted 20 years ago of theft. Brownlee is on parole following a drug conviction last year. Jobs are hard to come by for those not tainted with felony convictions not because the Fed is not doing enough. Jobs are scarce because the Fed is doing too much, and Obamacare is helping the Fed kill jobs. Lira’s job as a mortgage application processor was cut after the housing market crashed. The crash was a direct result of Fed policies.

“Although we work through financial markets, our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street,” Yellen said. If that’s truly the case (it’s not), the Fed needs to reverse course and do exactly opposite of what it’s been doing.

Thanks to Fed policies, workforce participation is the lowest it’s been in decades. Real unemployment (not the government-contrived number) is north of 23 percent and food prices (a real inflation indicator) are skyrocketing.

But Yellen brought out the cookies and milk for her speech. For the low-information crowd, that’s all it takes.

And by the way: Money printing will continue unabated for the foreseeable future. The stock market rose on the news.

How Vitamin D Prevents Influenza

Although your allopathic physician will not likely tell you this (preferring instead to vaccinate you with an ineffective cocktail of harmful agents), the best way to prevent the flu or to shorten its duration is to maintain adequate levels of vitamin D.

In his blog on VitaminDCouncil.org, Dr. John J. Cannell explains how it works.

Vitamin D is an important part of the immune system. Some studies have shown that there is a link between vitamin D levels and the risk of getting influenza. People who have low vitamin D levels may have a higher chance of getting influenza.

Vitamin D receptors are found on the surface of a cell, where they receive chemical signals. By attaching themselves to a receptor, these chemical signals direct a cell to do something: for example, to act in a certain way or to divide or die.

There are vitamin D receptors found on cells in the immune system, and vitamin D can bind to these receptors. Vitamin D works in the immune system by reducing levels of inflammatory proteins called cytokines, as well as increasing amounts of antimicrobial proteins, which destroy invading germs and viruses. This combination of lowering inflammation and increasing antimicrobial defenses can help your immune system fight infections better.

Research has shown that:

  • People who get the flu are more likely to have low levels of vitamin D.
  • The flu is more prevalent in winter months when vitamin D levels are naturally low.
  • Taking vitamin D can lessen your chances of getting the flu.
  • High vitamin D levels can speed up the recovery process.

In addition to helping to stave off the flu, maintaining adequate vitamin D levels protects against heart disease, cancer, osteoporosis and seasonal affective disorder. And it also slows down aging.

When Republicanism Died And How To Revive It

The government with all of its propaganda and police power is at war with the American people.

Governments always silently make war on their own citizens behind a propaganda front so as to alert as few people as possible. The less resistance from the people, the better it is for government.

One of the fastest ways to clear the mental fog is to realize that the two-party political system is only one. Anyone clinging to the illusion of two parties will be deceived to their grave. America has become a fascist state, and the whole Congress supports the agenda of the state. Any dissent expressed by the political class is frivolous pandering. Any expressed concern for the complaints of the people is feigned and contrived.

The election process in America has become a disguise for corruption that attracts the corrupt. When men and women go to Washington, they pretty soon learn that they are paid by the Federal government and, therefore, they are in the hire of the Federal government. No allegiance to their constituents is necessary and, as a matter of fact, there is very little pretension — at least until election time.

If Americans could restore their power over so-called elected representatives, this could cut out the smoke and mirrors of politics. I think the hour is late and even too late, but let’s try to reverse all the perks that our “elected representatives” have bestowed upon themselves. To do this we must first turn back the clock to see when and how Republicanism died.

The year 1913 was a terrible one for human liberty. The 16th and 17th Amendments were ratified that year, and the Federal Reserve central bank was established. The Federal Reserve created a fiat money system of theft for the benefit of the banksters and the moneyed elites. It is designed to impoverish the people. The 16th Amendment established a progressive income tax that the U.S. Supreme Court failed to strike down. The 17th Amendment changed the way Senators were selected, taking the appointing power from State legislatures and placing it in the hands of voters. That removed the final nail holding the checks and balances the States had in place over Federal power. Most of the nails were removed in 1861 when Abraham Lincoln shredded the Constitution, stripped Americans of their strongest check against Federal tyranny and invaded the secessionist States.

The result is that in 1913 the U.S. government was taken over once and probably for all time by moneyed power.

Many of the Founders — particularly the anti-Federalists — feared a powerful central government. So they established in the Constitution that each State’s legislature would choose its two Senators as one of the checks against a strong central government.

Depending upon their point of view, Founders either hailed or lamented the fact that, by simply refusing appoint Senators, the States could see the central government “destroyed” (William Richardson Davie) and “put an end to” (Samuel Johnston). Or, as Alexander Hamilton (who actually wanted a U.S. system similar to British mercantilism) opined: “It is certainly true, that the State Legislatures, by forbearing the appointment of Senators, may destroy the National Government.”

The 17th Amendment was proposed ostensibly to correct a procedural problem that cropped up when divided State legislatures were unable to agree on a Senator to send to Washington, D.C. This would leave States unrepresented.

According to a research paper by Wendy Schiller from Brown University and Charles Stewart III from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in about 2 percent of cases the State legislatures were deadlocked and unable to resolve their differences and select a Senator. However, it did occur — even occurring in the very first Congress, when the State of New York went without Senate representation for three months.

The direct election of Senators by the people ended that problem, but created a whole new problem in which Senators are now bought and paid for by the banksters and lobbyists. It is this system that explains why the Republican elite are all in for amnesty for illegal aliens, which is pushed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and big corporations but vehemently opposed by the majority of Republican voters.

The 17th Amendment played a key role in suppressing the voice and will of the people and elevating the fascist system under which we currently suffer.  There is much hue and cry these days about the need for campaign finance reform. Repealing the 17th Amendment would take the money out of Senate elections on the Federal level. Senators would be beholden to their State legislatures rather than the corporatist class which lines their pockets and finances their re-election campaigns.

We can also turn the clock back toward human liberty by doing one simple thing and that is by limiting the terms of Representatives and Senators and eliminate their Federal pensions. Also they should be put under the Social Security and the same Obamacare healthcare system as the American people! There should be no privilege associated with elected office.

Their ability to vote for themselves pay raises, their tenure and pension perks, their liberal, special low-cost health perks not available to citizens, their immunity from the laws they pass on the people, their retirement plans paid for by the government (read: the people) and their lack of term limits must all be removed. Their salaries should be paid by their respective States.

John McMullin, a lawyer who has written extensively in law literature about the 17th Amendment, believes that repealing the 17th Amendment would give State legislatures a greater say in the Federal political process in several ways. Among them, it would have the effect of elevating State legislatures from that of lobbyists to that of partners in the political process. The States would have the ability to decentralize Federal power when appropriate. It would also give States more influence over the selection of Federal judges and much greater say in the power of the Federal judiciary.

To this end, McMullin has proposed an amendment to repeal the 17th Amendment. It reads:

AN AMENDMENT TO REPEAL THE SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT AND RELINK THE STATES TO THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PROCESS

SECTION ONE. The Seventeenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

SECTION TWO. The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, selected by the legislature of each State. Each Senator shall serve a six year term and may be reappointed. Each Senator shall have one vote.

SECTION THREE. Among the duties of each Senator is the primary duty to represent the government of their State, and in particular, their State’s Legislature, in the Senate. For the purpose of maintaining communications with its Senators, each State Legislature shall establish a liaison committee and shall specify the duties, procedures, and method of appointment of that committee. This committee shall work with its United States Senators in evaluating the impact of federal legislation on their State. All legislation proposed by Congress, and all treaties proposed, shall be submitted to each State’s liaison committee.

SECTION FOUR. Senators are subject to removal by the State Legislature. Removal of a Senator requires a majority of each House of the State Legislature.

SECTION FIVE. Congress is precluded from enacting any legislation affecting the senatorial selection process. Each State Legislature shall enact rules and procedures, consistent with this amendment, related to the selection and removal of Senators.

SECTION SIX. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State Legislatures.

Several readers have also sent the following bill that, if passed, would also help to end the fascist system and restore Republicanism:

Congressional Reform Act

  • Term Limits. Twelve years only, one of the possible options below…
  • No Tenure/No Pension. A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay from government when they are out of office.
  • Congress members (past, present and future) participate in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.
  • Congress members can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
  • Congress members will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of the consumer price index or 3 percent.
  • Congress loses their current healthcare system and participates in the same healthcare system as the American people.
  • Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
  • All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective Jan. 1 the year following passage of this act. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.
  • Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.
    • Two Six-year Senate terms.
    • Six Two-year House terms.
    • One Six-year Senate term and three Two-year House terms.

I would also add that anyone serving in Congress should be banned from lobbying the Federal government or Congress at least for a period of no less than 20 years from the date of their retirement.

This will have to be done by the American people. You can imagine that power-hungry elected officials and the corporatocracy will oppose any move to limit their power.

It must be a bottom up grass roots effort beginning at the local and State level. Citizens need to force their elected officials to introduce the Congressional Reform Act and repeal the 17th Amendment. We must act now to take America back!

Nothing good can happen to America without major economic and political reform. Can you see it? The rule of law must return to America.

Really, Michelle?!?

Commenting on White House Releases Propagandist Video Of Michelle Obama Doing Something Great In China,
Stuart Buncher says:
March 28, 2014
She went to China to educate them about education. That is funny. The Chinese students coming to this country have higher IQs than most of our school age children. Children in a ghetto school never can show how smart they are which is unfortunate as there are a lot of Thomas Sowell and Dr. Ben Carsons out there who will never bloom.
Reply

On Religious Liberty

As was the case during the brouhaha over whether a bakery or photographer can deny service to a potential patron if doing so violates the owners’ religious beliefs, so has the debate raged over Hobby Lobby’s efforts to exempt itself from providing emergency contraceptive (abortion) coverage for its employees.

In all these cases, government is attempting to provide rights that do not exist to one group over the rights of Christians who choose not to violate their own beliefs.

Just as shoppers have the right (for any reason or no reason) to discriminate against the stores they choose to patronize (for instance, many choose to not shop at Wal-Mart for a host of reasons — from their employment practices to their product offerings), in a free society, store owners should not be compelled to provide a service that violates their belief system and business owners should not be compelled to offer an employment benefit that does so.

Certainly those patrons are free to shop at stores more “tolerant” of their practices. And employees are free to provide for their own abortifacients or seek employment at a business that provides it as a perk. So in none of the cases are the patrons or employees suffering from any form of “discrimination.”

But if government compels those businesses to provide those services in violation of their beliefs, government is trampling on their rights guaranteed under the 1st Amendment.

As Thomas Jefferson wrote: “The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”

According to Jefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom, government’s intruding into a person’s religious opinions was a fallacy that “at once destroys all religious liberty.”

And regarding religious liberty, the Massachusetts Bill of Rights reads: “It is the right as well as the duty of all men in society, publicly and at stated seasons, to worship the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe. And no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained in his person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping God in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; or for his religion profession of sentiments; provided he doth not disturb the public peace, or obstruct others in their religious worship….”

And finally, in A Memorial and Remonstrance, James Madison wrote: “The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man: and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate.”

Clearly, if religious liberty is to remain, a business owner should be free to deny service or deny a benefit on religious grounds if he so chooses.

Obama’s Continuing Constitutional Assault

Now even the state’s chief propaganda organ notes the Barack Obama regime is the greatest threat to press freedom in this generation. New York Times reporter James Risen, under attack to testify and disclose a source in the trial of a former CIA officer, made this claim in a conference of journalists, communication and government professionals on Friday.

Risen said, “The Administration wants to ‘narrow the field of national security reporting to create path for accepted reporting.’ Any journalist who exceeds those parameters ‘will be punished,’” according to a report by the Poynter Institute on Poynter.org.

Global press organizations have noticed, too. We reported last month that the U.S. had fallen to 46th place on Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index for 2014. And that was before we learned the FCC intended to place “monitors” in newsrooms across the country.

Reporters themselves are as much to blame as the Obama regime. They have accepted the regime’s ground rules for cooperation and have even submitted their articles for approval by the regime.

But it’s not just the 1st Amendment the Obama regime is assaulting. The entire Constitution is dying a death by thousands of paper cuts.

In addition to its targeting of national security reporting, the regime is targeting whistleblowers at an unprecedented rate. That, and National Security Agency and CIA snooping of reporters’ emails and telephone calls has had a chilling effect on sources.

The regime has targeted alternative media with a band of cyber warriors tasked with disrupting news sites and blogs “to make postings through proxy servers and effectively use alternate identities and multiple e-mail addresses. Their purpose is to spread disinformation, not truth.” By the way, we have identified a handful of these operatives at work on Personal Liberty Digest™.

The 2nd Amendment is under constant assault from the regime and its proxies. Just last week, Senator Dianne Feinstein began another attempt at passing a ban on so-called “assault weapons.”

The 4th Amendment died under George W. Bush, but Obama set the carcass on fire and then spit on it with his expansion of powers of the Department of Homeland Security and stepped-up spying by the NSA, CIA, FBI and others.

Obama’s assaults on the 5th and 6th Amendments through drone attacks and racist Attorney General Eric Holder’s Department of (In)Justice selective prosecutions are relentless.

Obama has bypassed Congress and destroyed the separation of powers through his use of executive orders and regulations enacted through the alphabet soup regulatory agencies. The passage of Obamacare itself, called a tax by the Supreme Court, violated Article I, Section 7.

Yes, the Obama regime is the greatest threat to the 1st Amendment — and the entire Constitution — in a generation, at least. But the undocumented usurper currently occupying the people’s house is probably even more dangerous to liberty than was Franklin Delano Roosevelt and maybe even as dangerous as was Abraham Lincoln. He’s certainly created a divide almost as wide as Lincoln created.

Note from the Editor: Under the Obama Administration, the NSA, the IRS, and the State and Justice departments are blatantly stepping on Americans’ privacy—and these are just the breaches we’re aware of. I’ve arranged for readers to get a free copy of The Ultimate Privacy Guide so you can be protected from any form of surveillance by anyone—government, corporate or criminal. Click here for your free copies.

Chemo Drugs Likely Cause Cancer

Cancer is serious business. Many patients who hear their doctor tell them they have cancer believe their death warrant has just been signed.

It’s also serious business for the medical-industrial complex, which makes big money off cancer treatments and cancer drugs.

In his book Questioning Chemotherapy, leading author and consultant on cancer treatment Ralph Moss, Ph.D., explains chemotherapy to be an effective treatment option in only 2 percent to 4 percent of cancers: Hodgkin’s disease, acute lymphocytic leukemia, testicular cancer and choriocarcinoma.

A new report funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and just published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) shows that cancer-fighting drugs actually induce major stem cell damage that causes more cancer. An abstract of the report can be seen here.

The upshot is that even though the chemical cocktails used to treat tumors are sometimes initially effective at stemming more tumor growth and the spread of more tumor cells, the damage they leave behind causes more tumors to develop on stem cells. And given the right environment and genetic background, those tumors could become malignant.

This is certainly not the first study to reveal this. I told you about one published in Nature Medicine 16 months ago.

There is a cancer clinic in the Bahamas that uses a non-invasive therapy to treat cancer. It’s certainly worth considering an alternative treatment to cocktails that cause more cancer.

The key is to do what you can to avoid cancer in the first place by maintaining a proper diet.

H/T: NaturalNews.com

War Is Becoming A Tough Sell

Like two bulls preparing to square off over their love interests in the herd, the U.S. government war crowd (and other G8 members) and the Russian government are increasingly stomping the ground and braying with more bellicosity.

After making threats that Russia and Vladimir Putin would suffer “costs” and there would be a “huge price to pay” if Russia annexed Crimea, Putin scoffed. He then proceeded to move toward drawing Crimea further into Russia’s sphere, a move backed by more than 90 percent of all Crimeans.

The first “costs” turned out to be sanctions against a list of Russian lawmakers and oligarchs who are in fact likely Putin rivals rather than Putin allies, as I wrote last week. One of those “sanctioned” was Yelena Mizulina, who had little to do with Crimea but authored legislation banning homosexual propaganda to Russian minors. Who knew the President Barack Obama homosexual-pushing agenda would extend to Russia?

Putin responded by first falling out of his chair laughing. Then he returned the favor and sanctioned a few U.S. lawmakers and bureaucrats. The sanctions gave psychopaths like Weeper John Boehner and Sen(ile) John McCain — both on the list for Russian sanctions — an opportunity to thump their chests as if they’ve done something to advance the American cause.

Obama promised more sanctions and “economic isolation” for Russia. Putin promised to just exchange the U.S. for other trading partners. This move would be disastrous for the U.S. economy. And it would be equally disastrous for Eastern Europe if Russia cuts off the natural gas it supplies.

Putin’s belligerence and Obama’s response — perceived as weak by the neocon war crowd infesting the Washington, D.C., cesspool — is driving the war hawks insane. They seem to be itching to goad Putin into a shooting war.

Weekly Standard Columnist Bill Kristol — chief propagandist for the U.S. war machine — bemoaned that Americans are war-weary. He believes they just need to be challenged to awaken them from their stupor.

“A war-weary public can be awakened and rallied. Indeed, events are right now doing the awakening. All that’s needed is the rallying. And the turnaround can be fast,” Kristol wrote. His neocon propaganda rag is doing its dead-level best to lead that turnaround.

But consider that the U.S. has been at war since 1990. There is a generation of young adults who have never known their Nation at peace. Don’t the American people have a right to be weary of war — especially wars ginned up by Kristol and his neocon brothers on behalf of the banksters and globalists?

It seems Ron Paul may be winning after all. In the past two efforts to drag America into another conflict, the majority of Americans said “No!”

Also consider that as the Cold War ended, the U.S. told Russia it would not move NATO into Eastern Europe if Russia would move its troops out. But by 1996, President Bill Clinton was urging NATO to extend full membership to former Warsaw Pact nations in 1999. Every President since then has used NATO to further surround Russia. It is just part of the neocon/globalist effort to encircle Russia and effect regime change throughout the Mideast and North Africa that has been ongoing since the early 1990s.

Consider as well what is behind the war. The U.S. and the EU were trying to drag Ukraine into the EU. Ukraine’s economy was/is faltering. The International Monetary Fund was unhappy with Russia-friendly elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, who was rejecting IMF demands to raise taxes and devalue the currency. Newly installed U.S. puppet Arseniy “Yats” Yatsenyuk is a central banker willing to do the IMF’s bidding. He was selected by the U.S., which invested $5 billion to throw Yanukovych from office.

Neocons and the war-loving U.S. media have demonized Putin, claiming he “took” Crimea and plans to take more Russian territory. The people of Crimea, who are mostly Russian, voted overwhelmingly to join Russia. Meanwhile, the U.S. was sacking Ukraine’s gold reserves.

Governments since the Roman Empire have created enemies to use to instill fear in the population so that the people are manipulated into giving more police power over to the government. Politicians always go along with this Machiavellian deception.

There is blatant oppression of the U.S. people now and the U.S. economic system is on the verge of unraveling, so more fear and more war is needed to manipulate the people against their own freedom. Oh, you know this is true.

Note from the Editor: Round two of the financial meltdown is predicted to reach global proportions, already adversely affecting Greece, Spain and most of Europe. It appears less severe in the states because our banks are printing useless fiat currency. I’ve arranged for readers to get two free books—Surviving a Global financial Crisis and Currency Collapse, plus How to Survive the Collapse of Civilization—to help you prepare for the worst. Click here for your free copies.

The Ukraine situation is a bankster-orchestrated crisis with the short game more money printing and the end game global governance. The U.S. is promising more money to prop up Ukraine’s economy, but the U.S. can’t even afford to pay its own bills. This will further open the money printing spigots.

We are seeing more war propaganda, but we aren’t told the fact that both the U.S. and Russia will use paper money to pay for the war. Paper money benefits the moneyed elites at the expense of the people.

There are two ways that government creates credit. The first is bank credit. This credit expands as long as people “borrow money.” When a debt overload develops, bank credit contracts as the people stop borrowing.

The second way is when the government “pays” credit into circulation through huge social programs or starts a war. When the public mood reverses from euphoria and optimism to despair and depression, bank credit collapses.

As long as the volume of credit is expanding, government and its political system reigns. But an involuntary contraction of credit brings people back to reality after bank credit strips them of their property through debt. The public becomes more hostile toward all government, politicians, authority and taxes.

This is why governments always try to extend the credit machine, even going so far as creating wars. They really do succeed for a time as they create larger and larger imbalances that always end in a credit collapse, such is now brewing.

There would be no wars without government/banker credit; but even if there were, they would be over quickly. Nobody would pay for wars with gold and silver, not even the government.

Americans may not completely understand all this in their heads. But they know it in their hearts.

How To Treat An Infected Wound

Dear Bob,

I am trying to avoid using antibiotics but need to use something on a wound that is getting infected. I have heard that bleach can be used on a wound, but I don’t know how much or how often. What do you recommend?

E.B.

Dear E.B.,

There is a bleach and water solution sometimes prescribed by doctors called a Dakins Solution. It has been used for many years to clean wounds and treat infections. While bleach will kill the bacteria, if it’s too strong a solution it will also kill healthy tissue and retard healing. Full-strength Dakins is .5 percent bleach. A more diluted concentration (about .0125 percent) is the most prescribed. It is antimicrobial but will not damage healthy cells. The problem you have is if you try and mix it yourself, you will most likely make a dose that is too strong and that will cause damage to your healthy tissues. If you choose to go this route, I would recommend you first see a physician or naturopath. If your wound infection is serious, don’t hesitate.

Best wishes,

Bob

Climate Science Abandons Science

The American Association for the Advancement of Science must be getting desperate. More people are growing wise to the lies, doctored data and climate model subterfuge of the anthropogenic global warming crowd. Their lies are disintegrating in harsh winter temperatures and because of the fact that actual temperatures show that the Earth is not getting warmer and that it has not in almost 20 years.

Last week, AAAS issued a new report, stating: “The rate of climate change may now be as fast as any extended warming period over the past 65 million years, and it is projected to accelerate in the coming decades.”

The scientists predicted, according to The Guardian: “An 8F rise — among the most likely scenarios could make once rare extreme weather events — 100-year floods, droughts and heat waves — almost annual occurrences.

“Other sudden systemic changes could lie ahead — such as large scale collapse of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, collapse of part of the Gulf Stream, loss of the Amazon rain forest, die-off of coral reefs, and mass extinctions,” the scientists claim.

The AAAS report presaged the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which is scheduled in coming days, because the AAAS was concerned Americans failed to appreciate the “gravity of climate change.”

“Despite ‘overwhelming evidence’, the AAAS said Americans had failed to appreciate the seriousness of the risks posed by climate change, and had yet to mobilise at a pace and scale needed to avoid a climate catastrophe,” The Guardian reported.

So now no warming is overwhelming evidence of warming? And 100 years of accurate measurements are now predictive of 65 million years?

The AAAS has given up any pretense of science. It should change its name to the American Association for the Advancement of Lies.