Arizona Shootings Spark Debate About Role Of Political Rhetoric


Arizona shootings spark debate about role of political rhetoricAlthough the motives of Jared Lee Loughner — the suspected shooter in this past weekend's massacre in Arizona — are still unclear, many politicians are placing some of the blame on the heated rhetoric used by elected officials and pundits.

Loughner has been charged with murder and attempted murder following a Jan. 8 shooting spree at a shopping plaza in Tucson, Ariz. Federal judge John Roll and 9-year-old Christina Green were among six people killed, while 13 others — including Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) — were wounded. According to media reports, Loughner has a history of expressing a radical distaste for the Federal government, and many who knew him said that he was a social outcast.

The deadly shootings have spawned a debate over the role of political rhetoric in the 21st century. Some officials have asked that politicians, as well as television and radio commentators, tone down their vitriolic language. Tea Party favorite and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has fielded criticism for images used on her website that placed crosshairs on specific congressional districts, such as Giffords'.

While some pundits have placed the onus on venomous political debate, several commentators have warned that it's dangerous to link specific politicians or organizations to a crime committed by an unstable individual.

"We've got to be careful here that we don't use this as a censoring moment, or use this as a Democrats-beating-up-on-Republicans [moment], or using it as an opportunity to humiliate anybody who's affiliated with the Tea Party movement," Douglas Brinkley, a historian, told FOX News. "There are definitely times when you have fallout from politics, but we don't want to lose the central point here: that this is a deranged person, that there's nobody serious in the Republican Party that would want to see such a heinous event happen." 

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.