Alaska Senate Race Goes In Front Of A Judge

0 Shares

Alaska Senate race goes in front of a judgeThe battle between Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Tea Party candidate Joe Miller has entered the courtroom.

More than a month after votes were cast in the Alaska Senate race, no winner has officially been declared. Murkowski, the incumbent who ran as a write-in candidate, claimed victory on Nov. 17 after it was revealed by the Division of Elections that she led Miller by more than 10,000 votes.

However, CNN reports that a Federal court is not allowing the votes to be certified until a state court decides on Miller's legal challenge. His lawyers claim that ballots that have Murkowski's name misspelled should be thrown out because evaluating a "voter's intent" is against state law.

Miller, the Republican who defeated Murkowski in the GOP primary in August, is also hoping for a hand recount of all ballots. Randy DeSoto, Miller's campaign spokesman, told the news provider that this case could eventually land in front of the United States Supreme Court if state courts do not side with Miller.

Kevin Sweeney, Murkowski's campaign manager, told the news source that her camp is confident that the judge will rule that counting misspelled ballots is lawful.

According to The Washington Post, Miller has reported raising more than $241,000 since the midterm elections. It is not specified how much of that money will be used to cover his campaign's legal fees.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.