Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made In USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley

December 2, 2010 by  

The official story of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, when airliners crashed into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, a hole was blown into the western side of the Pentagon and an airliner fell into a field in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, near the town of Shanksville, are seared into memory.

On that day, 19 hijackers commandeered four airliners — two from American Airlines and two from United Airlines — by overwhelming the passengers and crew with box cutters. The hijackers, who had been trained to fly in United States flight schools, then flew meandering routes before turning toward their targets. As the planes headed toward their destinations, some passengers were able to contact loved ones or authorities using cell phones.

At 8:46 a.m., American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the WTC. Initial news reports indicated the plane was a small one, and the thought was that the pilot had become ill or incapacitated or the plane had drifted off course in a tragic accident.

At 9:03 a.m. United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower. News cameras were on the scene and rolling at the time, so hundreds of thousands of television viewers — who were by now glued to the events unfolding in New York — and thousands of witnesses on the ground saw the plane slam into the tower. By now, Americans knew something more sinister than an accident was afoot.

At 9:37 a.m. American Airlines Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon, slicing through the two outermost of the building’s five rings and piercing the third. On United Airlines Flight 93, a transcript of the audio recorded by the cockpit voice recorder revealed that crew and passengers attempted to seize control of the plane after learning through cell phone calls that other planes had been crashed into the buildings. The famous line attributed to Todd Beamer, “Let’s roll,” preceded the efforts of passengers to gain control of the plane. Rather than be overtaken by the passengers, hijackers chose to fly the plane into the ground at 10:03 a.m.

At approximately 9:59 a.m. the South Tower, the second one struck, collapsed into its own footprint. The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m., also into its own footprint. The collapses were attributed to structural failure as a result of the fires which were super-heated by jet fuel. At 5:20 p.m., due to damage from the debris of the two falling towers and fire from initial attack, WTC Building 7 collapsed.

By the time the day was over, 2,996 people — the hijackers, passengers and crew on the airliners, New York firefighters, police and rescue workers — were dead. The attacks were attributed to al-Qaida, under the direction of Osama bin Laden and planning of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM).

But Webster Griffin Tarpley points out in 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, the story foisted by the government and trumpeted by the corporate media is full of holes. And the 9/11 Commission report — which Tarpley called the Kean-Hamilton Report after commission chairman and former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean and vice chairman and former Indiana Representative Lee Hamilton — did little to close the holes.

In fact, Kean and Hamilton both thought the commission was set up to fail. And Tarpley believes it was set up to fail so as not to expose those in the shadow government who were actually behind the 9/11 attacks.

Tarpley lays out his case that the attackers were not 19 men with little training and dubious intelligence, but a shadowy group of players that stretches across the spectrum of the intelligence agencies of the U.S., British and Israeli governments. Their aim was essentially a coup de main against President George W. Bush in order to force him to embark upon a war that Tarpley calls a clash of civilizations.

In making his case, Tarpley begins with a brief history of synthetic terror — that is, terror that is created by a group with ties to a government or governments and designed to force a change of some kind in that government but made to look like it is carried out by a nefarious organization of freedom fighters or criminals.

He then describes how Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida were created by U.S. intelligence operatives, first to battle the former Soviet Union in Afghanistan and then to foment activities in other parts of the world. He then describes the roiling economic situation of the 1990s and ties all these disparate parts together.

Tarpley then describes how a network of moles throughout government participated in the preparation and coverup of the events of 9/11 and how, without the actions of the moles and their patsies, 9/11 would never have happened.

Tarpley is very critical of Bush, not because he believes Bush was behind the attacks — Tarpley doesn’t believe Bush carries the mental acumen to pull off such an exercise — but because Bush failed to stand up to the perpetrators and in fact capitulated to the demands of those in the shadow government to embark on a 30-year war with Islam.

Tarpley believes it’s far more likely that Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were among the lead players in the events of that day, rather than Bush, bin Laden or Mohammed.

Realizing that there are skeptics to his theories, Tarpley asks only that one consider the discrepancies in the official story line:

That bin Laden, an insignificant son of a wealthy construction magnate and one of his minor wives (the elder bin Laden had many wives) hiding in the caves of Afghanistan, brainstormed an attack that was masterminded by the Egyptian KSM.

Under their direction four men, who were described by their flight instructors as unable to satisfactorily pilot small planes, piloted large commercial airliners through a series of difficult maneuvers striking three precise targets. That two (in the case of one plane) or three other hijackers controlled a plane loaded with passengers and a crew — that in some cases included military veterans — armed only with box cutters, keeping them in submission while the hijacker-pilots directed the planes toward buildings.

That the Twin Towers collapsed because the structural steel in them lost integrity due to the damage from the planes and heat from the fire. That Building 7 collapsed because of fire damage. That an incompetent pilot executed a maneuver with a commercial airliner that would be difficult for a trained and experienced pilot to execute in a highly mobile fighter jet. That an airliner tore a hole in the Pentagon that is smaller than the plane, and vaporized.

That an airliner crashed in one piece into a field and pieces of the plane’s wreckage and passengers’ personal effects flew as far as eight miles away from the crash site. That passengers were able to communicate with loved ones via cell phones despite the fact that the technology of the day would not have allowed that. That one of the hijacker’s passports survived the crash and fire and fell intact onto a New York sidewalk to be found by investigators. That Bush, showing strength in the face of crisis, spent 20 minutes reading to school children while the world flamed out around him. That Air Force One then took off with Bush despite the danger and uncertainties surrounding the events and no fighter jets were available to escort the President’s plane.

That the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) — tasked with protecting American skies — was unable to scramble jets to intercept the hijacked airliners or escort the President in a timely manner. That the War on Terror is a war against the people who carried out the attacks and/or who seek to carry out more attacks on U.S. interests.

Tarpley discusses each of these points and their implausibility. And he uses the known and reported facts from the days and weeks after the events and compares them to what we know — or think we know — now. Many of these facts — first reported in the hectic days after the attacks — have been flushed down the memory hole by the corporate media and neocon talking heads — and done so so effectively that they have been wiped from the collective consciousness of conventional wisdom.

He believes the attacks were a successful coup against Bush, that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by pre-set explosives, that the 19 hijackers were mere patsies and dupes and were as incapable of carrying out such an attack as bin Laden and Mohammed were incapable of planning it, that the planes were piloted by remote control into the Twin Towers, that Flight 93 was shot down by a U.S. fighter in order to prevent the interrogation of the hijackers and possible discovery of the remote control guidance system after the passengers gained control of the plane and that a missile or some other object struck the Pentagon, not an airliner — although he admits he can’t account for the ultimate fate of Flight 77 and its passengers and crew.

Tarpley’s theories are sound, his reporting excellent and his sourcing extensive. If what he posits is true, then the culprits behind that tragic day in September are still in control of our government.

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American and author of The Bob Livingston Letter™, founded in 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made In USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Concerned American

    Whether 911 was carried out as the government said it was or whether it was a false flag attack is irrelevent. Its clear the real target for slavery is the American people. Not muslums. We have turned our airports into minority report police state control zones that science fiction writers almost couldn’t dream of yet our southern border is wide open??? One of the supposed Muslum planners of 911 dined at the Pentagon after 911?? 911 was carried out by many people from Saudi Arabia but we invade Iraq? We fight the Taliban in Afghanistan but not try to hunt for Al Quieda?

    • Mike

      Maybe you can explain who is a “Muslum”?

  • BigBadJohn

    WOW Bob, I can’t believe you would actually recommend that folks on this blog educate themselves to the discrepancies surrounding 9/11!!!!

    Another glaring inconsistency that is not mentioned above is the fact that cell phones lose their signal at about 6000 ft. Leave your cell phone on in an airplane and check for yourself. Which of course means that famous phone call from flight 93 probably never occurred.

    I do not believe the buildings were completely wired to blow, that probably would have been noticed. However, even Al Queda knew in 1993 that all you had to do is blow the supports in the basement and the building would collapse from the center down. If you look at the footage that is exactly whats seems to have happened.

    If you want to know what happened – follow the money. Like maybe the ten billion in cash that Bush flew into Iraq?

    • Gaye

      Who said that the planes were at 6000ft when these people phoned their love ones, they could have been flying low at the time..

      I think it is time that people looked into the size of explosives it would take to blow these massive buildings and I think you would find that as yet one has not been made big enough to do so.. let alone the machinery to carry them.
      Besides, the tallest building taken down in the world is 439 feet, the twin towers were 1368 feet tall.. It takes months to prepare even a small building, and even a small building could not be wired, drilled and prepared in secret let alone two of them three times that size, and a smaller one along side, imagine the activity it would produce for months… Some conspiracies theorists have now changes their minds and are saying that a rocket was fired just before the plane hit????… they show poor quality photos and try to prove from this that it was a rocket….
      By trying to blame oursleves we take our eyes off the real problem thus putting ourselves in greater danger.
      All this started off by one man trying to make money out of it, and it has exploded into a mass money making machine for a few.. we are told that many experienced people have said different things and one of these experienced people said that all that he said was not only taken out of context but only a portion of what he said was told making it look as though he agreed with the conspiracies, so who is realy making the conspiracies the government or those wishing to make millions out of other peoples miseries.

  • FlaJim

    What a load of nonsense. Anyone who believes this conspiracy theory stuff ought to have his head examined. A lot of guys make money on this sort of facile idiocy (The da Vinci Code is a good example) but intelligent people rightfully dismiss it for what it is.

    I, for one, am not ready to join the tin foil hat brigade.

    • BigBadJohn

      ” What you focus on and what you believe about it creates the world that you live in” – Tony Robbins

      It is not “being in the tin hat brigade” to read, learn and examine both sides of any issue. Sometimes you just might surprise yourself and learn something contrary to what you “KNOW IS RIGHT!”
      Read up on the 9/11 commission report, even that has a ton of glaring inconsistencies. It is up to you to decide what you believe, but at least examine the evidence from both sides.

      Follow the money
      I would suggest that you look at who, what industry and how much was made as a direct result of 9/11. It “might” make you start thinking.

      • Gaye

        Wild conspiracy tales are peddled daily on the Internet, talk radio and in other media. Blurry photos, quotes taken out of context and sketchy eyewitness accounts have inspired a slew of elaborate theories.

        To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, POPULAR MECHANICS assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military.

        In the end, they were able to debunk each of these assertions with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense. They learned that a few theories are based on something as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day.
        There will be a few on here who will want to look this up.. others will just want to continue with their belief.. and I understand that also, as I also do not want to believe that our own would do this to us, but it might pay to look at these as well, which is just a few like this.
        Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report – Popular Mechanics
        images and stories gathered by the foundation building the memorial at ground zero.
        In 2008, the NIST notably solved the mystery behind the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, a source of long-running conspiracy theories.
        Videos for Part 01 of 10 – Inside The Twin Towers

        • fa

          Hard evidence?? Hard evidence?? I’ve seen that show. There’s nothing hard about PMs ‘Hard Evidence’.
          How come there are 1300+ architects and engineers questioning the 9/11 report? Not 70 ‘researchers’, but people who actually build, maintain, and bring down buildings for a living. And the leading question is not the twin towers, but Building 7, home to SEC, FBI, and CIA offices, which was brought down by ‘collateral structural damage and fires’.
          Oh, no, the gov’t report is spot on. And, M. Atta stopped the 757 right before impact, rolled down the window, and threw away his passport. Lucky, so that someone could find it and place some blame. No, we knew more about al-Queda within an hour of the impact of the planes than they knew about themselves, thanks to expert reporting by MSM and ‘experts’ in terrorism that could see al-Queda’s ‘signature’ all over the attack. (Maybe M. Atta spray painted a message on the tower when he had that window rolled down to throw out his passport).
          They couldn’t get a license to fly a cessna, but took the plane into the Pentagon at a how many g-turn, skimming over the traffic, into the only reinforced section of the Pentagon? If this was so brilliantly masterminded, why didn’t they make a smaller turn, and hit the un-reinforced section, thereby doing more damage?
          You know, for about 2 years, I bought the whole 9-11 deal. Cried, bought the book, felt proud, donated, etc. Then I saw what can be done with lies. Oh, I realize people died on that day; almost 3,000 that should not have. But, I fear the blame is misplaced, and fear more that is has been misplaced on purpose.

        • NCC

          Jack Nicholson sends a message to Gaye and all the 9/11 debunkers who attempt to defend the official story, “You Can’t Handle The Truth!” The truth being that 1,200 degree Fahrenheit jet fuel and office fires cannot produce 2,700+ degree Fahrenheit molten metal (found in the WTC rubble weeks after the collapse), but thermite incendiaries do, which burn above 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit and can melt through the engine of a car. When you drive your car down the road, does your engine ever melt from the gasoline igniting and exploding in the chambers to force the pistons to move the crankshaft? Office fires have never before in world history collapsed a steel framed high rise building because they do NOT burn hot enough to melt and destroy steel! Nanothermite (an advanced and extremely high temperature incendiary explosive) was found in all recorded dust samples spread out all over New York. Last I heard, they don’t make high tech military grade explosives like Nanothermite in a cave in Afghanistan! The 9/11 commission report and the NIST report are both bogus whitewashes because they failed to acknowledge basic laws of physics and thermodynamics.

          NIST engineer John Gross denying the presence of molten metal in the WTC rubble.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg&feature=player_embedded

          Richard Gage on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM&feature=related

        • NCC

          Michael Chertoff’s cousin Benjamin Chertoff was the head researcher who put together that hit piece for Popular Mechanics. Both of them are dual citizens for the United States and Israel. But you can’t be loyal to one country while at the same time be loyal to a foreign government, you can’t have it both ways. There’s a word for that, it’s called treason. Michael “Shirt Off” wrote the deceptively misnamed Patriot Act which took away many of our constitutional rights, he is an Israeli Mossad agent and he was somehow able to acquire a high position in our government (as the director of homeland security) and now he has a huge financial stake in the companies selling the airport body scanners!

          The Twin Towers and building 7 collapsed at the speed of gravity and buildings never do this, except when they are professionally demolished. Gaye, if you’re so sure that fire is an efficient steel framed skyscraper destroyer, then why don’t you partner up with Popular Mechanics and go out and start your own company called Fire Demolition Inc. Just set fire to a couple floors, wait an hour or two and then it will drop the building straight down into the path of greatest resistance at speed of gravity. You could put all the regular demolition companies out of business!

          • fa

            NCC:
            Thanks for the info, as well as mentioning thermite and Gage. Excellent point of one’s gasoline engine not melting due to combustion. Gee, they even race engines with ‘hotter than jet fuel’ fuels as well without collapse…
            Although I’ve not yet read the book, I do have to agree w/ Mr. Tarpley: W did not pull the trigger or push the button. I did think that for a while, but ongoing research is seeming to rule that out.

    • Cathy

      Hey FlaJim… “It’s a big club…and you ain’t in it.” — George Carlin

      If you trust this government, good luck!

    • Gael

      Wall Street and its Federal Reserve bankers were behind 9-11.

      Read “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler”;
      also read: “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution”
      by Prof Antony Sutton

      Also read “Secrets of the Federal Reserve” by Eustace Mullins

      These books are free on the internet and these men are also interviewed on the internet.

      Wake up and realize Wall Street is running our governments.

      “All we need now is a major crisis and the world will accept the New World Order.” – David Rockefeller. The Rockefeller funded Hitler

  • Peter Carminati

    Remember what Mark Twain once said? “…lies, more damn lies and statistics.”

    That is the only definition I use to describe propaganda.

    You don’t think that the Arabs are guilty? Look at the evidence. They were handy “objects of interest” to make the crime look real.

    Let me remind you that the CIA spent years in Vietnam setting the stage for the war that we were destined to fight there. The northern Vietnamese Catholics were stirred up and forced to move to Saigon, leaving the field open for the future Viet Cong and the eventual evacuation of the French military. Keep this mind when you look at other pre-engineered crises that benefit the banksters, war-minded politicians and other liars you were duped into voting for.

    • Cathy

      Boy, are you right on!

    • Gaye

      Peter, what proof do you have that the CIA CIA spent years in Vietnam setting the stage for the war that we were destined to fight there, what proof is there that they were involved in all of this…or is it just someones ideas again..
      If we stop looking at the real picture we are in danger of being destroyed again, and I mean that if you are right or others are right. In this case above we know that the Brother hood of Muslims are bringing about a gathering of Muslims world wide, to destroy non Muslim countries so we have to be sure who is our enemy or else we will definetly be destroyed.. especially when we see non stop world wide Muslim violence, with over 16438 terrorist attacks since sep 11th and constant marches by Muslims in our own countries where they say to kill the infidels, that they will take the world… that we are scum… that Europe is the cancer, islam is the answer… Islam will dominate the world… Europe take some lessons from 9/11, etc.
      As I am writing from Australia it is strange to see the time difference, it is 7.09 am here but it will come up as 3.??pm there.

      • fa

        2 things:
        You cite the number of ‘Muslim terror attacks’ since 9-11. How many US attacks have there been, and are they justified?
        As far as the CIA goes: Heroin. Air America. Shipping if over in body bags with dead soldiers. Helping to keep the live ones hooked when they got back over here.
        Eisenhour warned of the Military Industrial Complex (as well as the Federal or Government/Academic Complex) in his farewell address. Since late November 1963, we’ve been guaranteed a succession of seemingly endless wars. Hmmm, we seem to be in another series now, but with the end in sight. Wait a minute, what about N. Korea/Yemen/Iran? Looks like another cycle of ‘war’ to enrich the bankers and the war mongers is on the horizon.
        Look outside of your pen and see part of what is going on!

  • Kevin Beck

    I find it interesting at the very least that the buildings’ structural steel would collapse from the heat of jet fuel burning. Jet fuel, being mostly kerosene, will burn at under 300 degrees–it cannot be heated higher unless the air pressure is multiplied. Structural steel would not melt at under 2000 degrees. The jet fuel would not even have an impact on the steel. Since the impact on the North tower was near the top of the structure, how would this have impacted the steel’s integrity on lower floors? Answer: It wouldn’t. Remember: The floors below the crash did not burn or collapse until the entire building collapsed. Now, if the tower was shaken so hard so as to lose its bearings (steel being ripped apart within the towers), and this could have caused the collapse (doubtful), then the collapse would have occurred more quickly after impact. I still think that would be questionable, because this would mean that even a minor windstorm through Manhattan would have broken the towers.

    • Aix Sponsa

      Ever see a blacksmith blowing bellows into his fire to make steel soft? All big buildings are made with a hollow center containing elevators and utilities. The buildings burned like a “flue fire” and melted the upper structure. When that collapsed the additional pancaking (karate brick breaking) caused the lower floors to collapse.
      The only question I have is cell phone calls.
      Commercial Pilot 41 years with an engineering degrees.

      • Aix Sponsa

        Allow me to add: In 2000 I made cell phone calls at only 7,000 ft. above ground with a Motorola StarTac phone. The only problem was that the system seemed to maybe have a hard time changing towers fast enough and finally cut me off. 250 knots airspeed. Never tried it at altitude.

        • Gaye

          Aix, as I said before, how do we know that the plans were at 6000 ft, they might have been at a much lower altitude.. and I am not saying that I know as I dont.

      • BigBadJohn

        That is the 9/11 commission story and is very feasible. The one issue I have with this story are the center supports. I agree that if the floors collapsed they would take out the floor below, etc, etc. However the center supports were steel reinforced concrete towers designed to carry all of the weight of all of the floors. Typically these start out HUGE at ground level and thin out as you go up. Logic would say that at least portions of one or more of those support towers would stand, particularly near the ground level. However, those center support towers disappeared vertically along with the floors.

        • Cathy

          Ever hear of thermite?

          • EDWARD

            “Wiring” the bldgs would have been easy using expendable foreigners working long nights for the promise of big pay and a return to their countries. No passports req. Just keep ‘em sequestered within the bldgs for the duration. On payday (9/11), have them all meet on the targeted floors and POOF! – free labor and no witnesses.

      • BigBadJohn

        One more area of contention about the flue theory. When the planes crashed into the towers, they knocked some of the fire proof insulation off of some of the floor joists – but not all of it. The fuel was concentrated where the plane struck not spread evenly.

        As an engineer, answer this simple question, Is it even possible that all of the floor joists were heated evenly? NO WAY!

        If the metal fatigued and deformed, it would have occurred in areas, like maybe half of the floor. If only half of the floor collapsed, the downward progression would be much more uneven than what is witnessed.

  • Hank

    Believe what you want to believe but in reality anything by those in
    political power is possible. WAKE UP AMERICA AND PROTECT YOUR BUTTS!!!

  • david johnson

    Mr.tarpley is a nut job.

  • Truth-Seeker

    Right on, Bob. 9/11 Synthetic Terror is an excellent book describing the many holes in the government 9/11 story and how such intelligence agencies as the CIA, British MI-6 and the Israeli Mossad really work (and work against the interests of the people). There’s absolutely no question that 9/11 was an inside job–as anyone who has done the research would know. Contrary to what Concerned American says, it is NOT irrelevant whether it was a false flag attack. We need to determine who did it in order to know who the real enemies of America are. We have instead been fighting a fraudulent “War on Terror” and wasting our resources and lives in Afghanistan and Iraq, all based on lies by our government and news media about who did 9/11. We have had many of our liberties taken away by the Patriot Act, Homeland Security Dept., etc., again based on the lies that Bin Laden and 19 Arab hijackers did 9/11. So, yes we DO need to know who really did it–and we will not regain our freedoms until we bring the real perpetrators to justice.

  • SALLY WILSON

    Those who don’t believe that 911 was not an accident you should go to Loose Change video and then tell me what you think they prove it all.

    • Cathy

      Right Sally…Loose Change 911. I have the DVD and have watched it more than once. Too many questions, not enough answers.

      If any of your believe that our government would never do something like this, think again.

      I remember thinking when I saw those buildings fall…damn, that looked just like an intentional implosion! I’ve watched quite a few, after all, since I live in Vegas.

  • Don

    Mr.Livingston, I had a good amount of confidence in you until you threw your support behind these ridiculous theories of Mr. Tarpley. It would be impossible to rig explosives in the Trade Towers and Bldg. 7 without being noticed and how could it be possible to equip airliners with remote control devices without someone in airline maintenance knowing it. And with cell phones on board someone would have made it known if the highjackers had been overcome on flight 77. There was a smoking hole where this flight went down and eyewitness accounts of the airliner going into the Pentagon and where is the plane and the people if it was a missle that struck the Pentagon. C’mon Man!

    • NCC

      Don, you need to go read up on Dov Zakheim, he’s a dual U.S./Israeli citizen who was comptroller at the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks. On the day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld announced that 2.3 Trillion dollars had gone missing from the Pentagon accounting books, and this evidence got buried under the 9/11 rubble the next day, so then nobody was able to determine where the missing 2.3 trillion dollars went!

      • Marcus

        There you go the Joos did it. You are pathetic.

  • http://sometruthofthekoran.blogspot.com/ Lowell

    So there were others envolved? Why would that be so amazing? The year before there were over 70 successful interceptions of planes flying where they weren’t supposed to be. On Sept. 11, 2001, there were a total Failure rate of interceptions. Why? Figure it out on your own, if you really want to.
    More importantly, don’t go letting Mo-The-Hamm-Man off. 1400yrs of killing will continue into your future.

  • Randy

    Just a theory, forget the controlled explosions, except for building 7 when they said “pull it” it was not hit by anything, and fell like a controlled demolition several hours after the towers. What if the governments decided that a major catastrophe was required to start reduction of the constitutional rights of Americans? Could they have made a deal with a foreign outlying group to do the deed? Osama is gone, could he be in the United Arab Emirates with his family that was flown out on 9/11? We funded him in the fights that bankrupt the USSR with CIA help. What if the people hijacking the plans had no idea they were part of a plot? I say stop the wars and let the American people defend themselves. We are no better than Iraq or Afghanistans we as they, only have small arms, no tanks, artillery, ships, or aircraft. What harm can they do to an armed America? If we had our full second amendment rights it would be a short battle if extremists went into a mall to kill people. If 70% of the public was armed the fight wouldn’t last long. I’m not saying let everyone carry an AK-47 just documented Americans.

  • Mike

    When 9/11 happened, shortly after that it was already known that both buildings did not collapsed due to airplanes that crashed into them or the fire but both buildings fell due to structure damage caused by multiple explosions. These explosives were planted to the main structure carriers long before planes crashed into the buildings. Everything was planned and government knew about all this. This was the reason to invade Iraq and next will be Iran. After all, invasion of Iraq and Iran was planned already in 1960′s because these were the only 2 countries that did not agree US to get their oil. As you will see, Iran will be next. What Mr.Livingston is saying is nothing new but very true.

    • dr reality check

      We lost the wars with Vietnam and Afghanistan and Iraq’s puppet govt will never survive. How are we supposed to handle Iran, which seems much more formidable? If this was a planned conspiracy, it certainly failed miserably. If there’s really a shadow govt, it must be run by the Marx brothers (and I don’t mean Karl).

  • dr reality check

    Aside from the silliness of any conspiracy theory, there is another ironic quality to this one. If I understand the article (and I’m not sure I do), you’re saying 9/11 was like the burning of the Reichstag or the fictional Overton Window (Glen Beck book); create a disaster, than blame it on the people you want to target, thus uniting your people against a common enemy and under your control. If this was true (which I doubt), it was a failure as we’re about to lose our third war in a row (we lost Vietnam and Afganistan, and Iraq will revert to an Islamic dictatorship as soon as we leave). Islam may spread evil around the world, but our failed wars and 9/11 itself have only greatly accelerated the spread of this religion around the world, as comparative numbers of the world religions have shown over recent years.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.