Doc’s right….SERIOUS work. So, all you lazy conservatives get to work. Millions of welfare parasites, greedy union thugs, and overpaid government workers need your paychecks!

From http://commonsenseandchicks.com/

“If you claim that ‘corporations are not people,’ then you must claim that unions are not people. The truth is, both are people, more precisely, groups of people.”

Citizens United removed the unfair advantage that labor unions had for decades. Period.

Yes !!!!!!!

It is the WORD of GOD, and HIS WORD has been around longer than your and my miserable soul has, and eons before HE created sinful man! We are all messed up, we needed grace from a merciful GOD and HE gave us a Savior – HIS name is JESUS, HE paid for our sin with HIS righteous blood, so read the truth in John 3:16-17 “For GOD so so loved the world that HE gave HIS only begotten SON, that whoever believes in HIM should not perish but have everlasting life. For GOD did not send his SON into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through HIM might be saved.” So believe HIM not me while you are still on this side of eternity!

Semper Fi (for HE is the great I AM!!!!)

Thank you! That’s the way I see it. My God save us from those who don’t understand the meaning of the words they quote.

Well, the GOP sees the Christian vote as up for grabs and a large voting block.

During W Bush rise to a statehood position, he lost an elected to opposition, at which time he came away saying ,” he would never be out Jesus’ed or out Flag’ed again. ”

And if you will remember when Rick Perry enter the race he spent two weeks tanking up on Jesus before hand, making the round, kissing babies and pressing the flesh and singing Gods praises.

This ploy use too work for them ~ I’m not sure if it does anymore.

Charles: The problem with Jesus is that he never experienced life as I know it.

He experienced life more then you will ever know.

Charles: He never married (fell in love with a woman),

He had a profound love for women, the purest.

Charles: he never raised children.

He raised 12 Apostles that turned the world up-side-down.

Charles: He never buried one of his infant children who got sick and died.

No, but he raised a cherished friend from the dead and healed many from disease and misery.

Charles: Never buried his parents.

God was His Father, and He died before His mother.

Charles: Never had a wife who cheated on him.

Israel was His wife, and she cheated on Him shamelessly and without restraint.

Charles: He never fought a war (Vietnam, etc).

He fought the ultimate war, and conquered the most formidable enemy.

I understand your position and respect it. Fortunately or unfortunately I live in a world based on fosil fuels, electricity, airplanes, etc. For example, some say he went up to heaven. But what does up mean. In my understanding of our world it would be more correct to say he went out into space where there is no up or down. My point is we all have our undestanding to the best of our abilities, but one must be very careful when they take the literal meaning of the words. Sincerely and respectfully yours..

I would like to add one more thought. I belong to a Christian church and members of my church insist that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. I happen to agree with that definition. But you define Jesus as being married to a piece of real estate called Israel. Well, which is it? Is marriage a union between a man and a woman or is it a union between a man and a piece of real estate or a “tribe.” ? It seem to me that we should be able to come to some agreement on what the words mean. Or, use another word to describe the relationship between the Son of God and Isreal! Again, Sincerely.

Not bad, eddie, that’s a relatively balanced assessment.

Just remember, however, that fascism is a leftist system, not born from any right wing thinking. That which feeds into the rubric of ever more powerful centralized government is left of center.

You also could have added that corporatism has found friends on both sides of the corrupt political spectrum.

Well put Eddie, you are getting it. Here’s another thing you should consider.
If big greedy companies control the market, we can choose not to support them. With anti-trust laws in place, we can go to a competitor if we feel they are profiting too much, or treating their employees badly (or overpaying them). They have to be accountable to the public. If their product or service is below par, they’ll go out of business.
If, on the other hand, a big greedy government controls the market, we HAVE no choices. We are at their mercy and have to go along with whatever they offer us. They do not have to be accountable to anyone. If their product or service is below par, we’re stuck with them.
So, the right promotes the former, the left promotes the latter.
And don’t think that we can “vote” away inefficiency in the case of the latter, they are union controlled and again not accountable to the public. Just try to vote away the excessive (and greedy) pensions that many government employees get.
Don’t you think we are better off dealing with the former?

I didn’t know you had it in you, Eddie

“Mikey,”

A PROBLEM WITH YOUR POINT IS THERE IS NO COMPETITION FOR CERTAIN COMPANIES. THE BEST EXAMPLE I KNOW IS UTILITIES.

DURING SUMMER AND WINTER, Memphis Light, Gas and Water ISSUE $400 [AND-UP] BILLS TO POOR CONSUMERS WHILE CONSUMERS IN FINANCIALLY-COMFORTABLE NEIGHBORHOODS HAVE UTILITY BILLS IN THE $150-$300 RANGE. WHEN THESE POOR PEOPLE CAN NOT PAY, THEIR SERVICE IS DISCONNECTED FOR WEEKS [OR, MONTHS] UNTIL A RELIGIOUS-BASED AGENCY PAYS THE BILL FOR THEM.

IT IS A SHAME CABLE-TELEVISION COMPANIES HAVE COMPETITION, BUT, UTILITIES DO NOT; ALL MAJOR CITIES NEED MORE THAN ONE UTILITY COMPANY.

CAH, you are correct, there are still areas where there is no competition.
Your example should be an opportunity for another company to come in and sell power. However, heavy regulation makes it difficult to do so unless you have a lot of money. It takes wealth to start competitive businesses.
If that were to happen, the consumer would be the winner. Remember when AT&T was forced to break up when MCI challenged them with anti-trust laws? Everyone’s phone bills went down.

.
There is no such animal as a moderate . . . There are only gutless liberals who are too cowardly to admit they are liberal, claiming to be moderates appeases thier guilt complex.

Let’s add voter fraud to your analysis. I have never heard of voting districts giving 99.7 % of the vote to one person. Add also the succession of over 26 states from the union who smell more than the usual stench from this election.

“Tea-Party Patriot (TPP),”

YOU SAY, [sic], “There is no such thing as a moderate … ” WELL THEN, ” … TPP,” WHAT WOULD YOU CALL A PERSON WHO SUPPORTS TEA-PARTY VALUES 99.9% AND IS HOMOSEXUAL?

Jimmy Carter was NOT a morally decent man, because he did not have the courage of his convictions. He said he was anti-abortion, a Baptist preacher, and yet he endorsed and promoted the only party to promote and endorse it. If you’re a preacher, there would be no way you could live with your own hypocrisy on something so completely vital to your spiritual beliefs. He was a phoney, like all Democrats.

Oh yes Christopher, the peanut farmer who could care less about our military…dumb as a rock…….a globist in disguise as a peanut shell, that’s empty.

“Stuart Shepherd,”

THERE ARE MANY NEGRO PREACHERS WHO HAVE “CHICKS ON THE SIDE,” BUT, THEY “GET UP” EVERY SUNDAY MORNING AND TELL OTHERS WHAT THEY ARE DOING WRONG – “Mr. Shepherd,” WHAT WOULD YOU CALL THAT?

PEOPLE ARE GETTING READY TO D-E-S-T-R-O-Y General David Petraeus SIMPLY BECAUSE HE IS TIRED OF HIS WIFE. “CHEATING” HAS NO IMPACT ON WHETHER A GOVERNMENT PROFESSIONAL CAN KEEP NATIONAL-SECURITY “SECRETS.” IF THE GOVERNMENT HIRED A “BLABBER-MOUTH” [NOT, General Petraeus], IT SHOULD SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT HAVING AN ADEQUATE “VETTING” PROTOCOL.

“nickkin,”

President Carter WAS A MORAL MAN WITH INTEGRITY. DISAGREEING WITH HIS STANCE ON FOREIGN POLICY DOES NOT DIMINISH HIS MORALITY.

If you believe in the Bible for your factual history and future, you are being sadly misinformed. The Bible is simply a number of myths cobbled together in an attempt to control your life. Note the massive control exercised by the Catholic Church. (Myth is described as “A story in which the facts cannot be verified”) If you can verify any of the facts in the New Testament, please set them forth here. I would very much like to see them. RalphE.. (PS You cannot use the Bible to prove the facts in the Bible.)

Ask and yea shall receive.

http://www.pleaseconvinceme.com/index/The_New_Testament_Is_Verified_Archeologically

vicki,
This link offers a great deal of very interesting information regarding the existence of Luke and other writers from the Bible, but it can do little to verify the stories.

I have just finished reading a series of books about the supernatural that is based in the San Francisco bay area. I know the area, so I know that those portions set there are accurate, but that does not mean that one can drive into a wooded area of Mill Valley and find another world created by an ancient god.

I may not agree with your beliefs, but I thank you for the link. It is a very interesting addition to my Biblical studies.

“Vigilant,”

I MENTIONED HOMOSEXUALITY IN MY COMMENTS BECAUSE DURING THE DEBATES, Governor Johnson SAID HE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE DO IN THE BEDROOM.

HOMOSEXUAL MODERATES/CONSERVATIVES EXIST. LIBERTARIANISM IS A GREAT ALTERNATIVE FOR THOSE WHO “FEEL STRANGLED” BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY’S ALLEGIANCE TO THE CHURCH.

Senator-Elect Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) IS AN EMBARASSMENT AND HAS NO CONNECTION – WHATSOEVER – TO LIBERTARIANISM.

I have no argument to your points, CAH.

“Stuart Shepherd,”

I DEFINITELY DO NOT WANT TO “SIDE” WITH THE LIBERAL MEDIA. IF THIS “CHANGING DEMOGRAPHY” ACTUALLY EXISTS, THEN STATISTICIANS WILL HAVE TO DO A “BREAKDOWN” OF THESE PEOPLE’S MORAL VALUES.

AS I HAVE STATED BEFORE, I AM AN ATHEISTIC-NEGRO-MALE HOMOSEXUAL WHO SUPPORTS THE REPUBLICAN [AND NOW, LIBERTARIAN] PARTIES.

“Mr. Shepherd,” THE PROBLEM IS:

I). Republicans have decided being conservative MUST mean you walk DAILY with your hand in “The Lord’s Hand.” Therefore, all atheists are AUTOMATIC liberals;
II). Republicans have decided – because of evening-news reports on crime and welfare rolls – that all Negroes support the Democratic Party because Democrats constantly show a FAKE caring about Negroes’ plight. Thus, for many Republicans, the Negro Republican is a myth. Herman Cain may have received more support during the primaries if Caucasian Republicans had felt Mr. Cain could be TRUSTED; AND,
III). Republicans – regardless of their actual level of piety – STRONGLY hold to the Leviticus Verse in The Bible regarding same-sex behavior. In conjunction, like it or not, when pornography became widely available to all Americans in the late 1960s/early 1970s, pornography had a Caucasian face. Therefore, with nationwide access to pornography ALL Americans assumed the adult-entertainment industry was a Caucasian-only industry. Hence, most people had never seen a Negro homosexual. Since homosexuality is primarily linked with the Democratic Party, Republicans can not understand how a Negro homosexual can be Republican.

“Mr. Shepherd,” I DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO SAY TO YOU IN ORDER TO PROVIDE AN UNDERSTANDING FOR YOU. “Mr. Shepherd,” REPUBLICANS WHO SHARE YOUR VIEWS WERE A BIG PROBLEM IN REFERENCE TO THIS ELECTION’S OUTCOME.

MANY LIBERALS WOULD SAY CAUCASIAN REPUBLICANS DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE EXPOSURE TO ALL PEOPLE OF COLOR – WHICH CREATES UNDERSTANDING. IF Governor Mitt Romney HAD THIS “UNDERSTANDING,” HE WOULD HAVE WON.