What do you mean no sign no issue? You don’t need a sign up to keep people from coming on your property.

Pamela,
I really wanted to respond, but now, I can’t think of any responce to such a moroni, idiotic post from you

Vicki, can’t you see what has been going on since Obama has been president?
He is testing the Constitution to see how much he could get away with violating our rights as freedom loving American’s. He has mayors such as Bloomberg, and Manuel using their cities as litmus tests to see how much We The People will tolerate with Bloombergs fining people who have more then 32 ounce cups of soda, and Bloomberg, Manuel of Chicago and Mayor Menino of Boston all denying Chick-fil-a permits to open restaurants in all of the above cities which is all blatant violations of the Constitution and without any reservations to do so.
Obama is a Communist and he is infiltrating America from within to change our form of government from a Democracy to a Communist government. He started like all Communist govrnments do, by destroying our economy, our deficit more then doubled in the 3 and 3/4 years Obama has been in office, now he is attacking more in local laws such as this good samaritan woman giving out water to thirsty people, and in Chester, Pa. the local authorities stopped a woman from giving free lunches to poor children who’s families don’t have the money to afford to provide their children with money or food for lunch. He wants We The People to come to the government for our basic needs, that is why he is so anti business, he wants us to ask the government for social programs such as welfare and food stamps.
These are all prime examples of government control of the people. I hope you now know what Obama has to do with local issues as well as federal issues.

sophillyjimmy, This was going on long before Obama came into office, and will be going on long after he is dead and gone. The city fathers think they have the right to control all actions on or in a public area, regardless if you are handing stuff out or selling something. Seems you almost need a permit to lay on the grass in a city park.

Vicki, it is not what he did directly but rather the influence of the feds making the states, counties, and cities bolder in doing these things.

Chester, he implied this had started before obama and said it had gotten worse under him.

I swear Obama did it and he must have been there and it can’t be for any other reason! It’s a local city issues so how many times have we heard that story? Paul Ryan came to our state last week and I swear all the corn crops died because of his visit. It has to be the reason!!! It must be true!!! LOL! LOL!

Just keep in mind if we always blame obama we will start sounding like liberals always blaming President Bush.

Your “facts” are missing relevant information: (i) whether it was her private property or not, did she have the owners permission to be there, and (ii) since she’s not selling anything, it’s not self-evident that requiring her to adhere to the requirements for “other vendors” (normally “vendors” are sellers of goods or services) is at all appropriate. Oh, and concerning what are you “Vigilant”?

Vigilant, is goes way beyond religion, it goes to the heart of Obama’s forcing minor laws on people to see how far the government could go before We The People revolt. He is following the Communist plan to overthrough our Democracy first by destroying our economy which he has already did in his first 3 and 3/4 years in office, he has violated the Constitution numerous times with not retaliation from any of our elected officials now he has his lackies in the local municipalities such as Bloomberg testing the people of NYC with his fining them if they are caught with more the 32 ounces of soda, while consuming 40 ounce bottles of malt liquor to be ok. He has mayors such as Bloomberg, Manuel of Chicago and Menino of Boston refusing to give permits to Chick-fil-a to do business in their cities, so where this good smaritan is getting water to give to thirsty people during this heat wave we have had for some time now it is just testing our willingness to follow the government like sheep and it is all going to come down to he eventual abolishment of the most sacred government document in the world which is the Constitution, which gives us our freedoms like no other country in the world has, and shyte if anyone will take my freedoms away from me without a fight. I was born free and I would rather die fighting to keep my freedoms rather then to live without them.

VEND vt. – to sell as an occupation; to be employed in ‘selling’ – VEND’ER,VEND’OR n.

And what is the reason for a ‘Vending License’, to tax those involved in commerce so the government can obtain their share of the business venture? Does the City of Phoenix’s Law also require philanthropists, who are involved in selling nothing, to acquire a ‘Mobile Vending License’?

PHI-LAN’THROPY n. – charity or benevolence for the good of others; a humanitarian endeavor – PHIL-AN-THROP’IC, PHIL-AN-THROP’I-CAL adj. – PHIL-AN-THROP’I-CAL-LY adv. – PHI-LAN’THRO-PIST n.

By restricting and ceasing Ms. Crow-Smith’s ‘Christian Philanthropy’, they have violated her ‘communication of religious beliefs’ through example of action. Just why is it that you seem not to understand the violation of Ms. Crow-Smith’s 1st and 14th Amendments, since she was definately not involved in any type of vending?

Vigilant, as usual is rationalizing to justify his out of touch point of view. And as usual is full of crap.

Big Woody, I’m rationalizing nothing. You might want to avail yourself of a good dictionary to discover the meaning of the word “rationalize.” I reported and sourced a document, nothing else.

RivahMitch says, “Your “facts” are missing relevant information.”

No sir, it’s Brian Nash who fails to report “relevant information.” The concerns you mention are exactly what I’m talking about. Brian Nash needs to take a remedial course in journalism. He always attempts tp provoke discussion while leaving out relevant facts. It’s intellectually dishonest, shoddy journalism and pure provocateurship when he does this.

He knows that 99% of the respondents here will not take the time to research the whole story, but will jump on their horse and ride off in 4 different directions. Then idiots like Big Woody will take potshots at the messenger when relevant facts are disclosed.

You did it again, Vig. I should know enough not to post before researching some of these sensationalistic stories. Thanks! This is what so many writers do, and I used to think that PLD was above using the tactic, but I guess I’m wrong. Bob’s gang is just like all the other rabble-rousers, but I wouldn’t say the same for him. These writers just love to keep the hate going.

sophillyjimmy says, “Vigilant, is goes way beyond religion, it goes to the heart of Obama’s forcing minor laws on people to see how far the government could go before We The People revolt.”

I submit that this has nothing to do with Obama, with the exception that his dictatorial actions have emboldened city council and lower functionary idiots to exert their power.

These kinds of ordinances and laws have been around for decades. And these kinds of warnings, injunctions and fines have been around for just as long. What you’re seeing now is sudden publicity of these things, which occur by the hundreds each year in towns across America. It’s ludicrous to assume that Obama takes a personal interest in the machinations of every city council or homeowner’s association.

Do I think the city may have overstepped its bounds? Unlikely, since no official citation was ever issued. Do I think this particular vendor law is unjust? Not having all the relevant information, I wouldn’t know. Do I think that Brian Nash has left out information which would facilitate a more balanced discussion? Most definitely.

So then any complaint should be issued by the Property Owner or by anyone Damaged by her water. Perhaps a license should be required for give-aways when they support possible Commercial gain. You neglect the fact that all stages of Government have become too Large and too Controlling.

The woman who was giving out the water may have been doing a good thing but I question her motives for doing the good thing. Even good things can be done for the wrong motives. Her assumption is that people are too helpless to get their own water.

It would not matter what he did. They would find fault. They will never admit they are wrong.

Saved the USA???
ha ha ha ha har har ha ha ha ha,
that was a joke right?
my god you can’t beleive that!

swampfox says:
August 23, 2012 at 12:00 am
Saved the USA???
ha ha ha ha har har ha ha ha ha,
that was a joke right?
my god you can’t beleive that!

—————————-

You either cannot read, cannot understand what you do read, or are just dense.