Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

King Obama Flouts The Law Again

June 22, 2012 by  

King Obama Flouts The Law Again
UPI
Last week, President Barack Obama announced a change in the immigration policy.

What a difference a year makes — especially if you’re running for re-election and your pollsters tell you that you’re in deep doo-doo.

Last July, Barack Obama told his favorite Hispanic group, the National Council of La Raza, that he knew “some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own.” He admitted that the idea was “very tempting.” Then he added, “But that’s not how — that’s not how our system works.”

In September, he expanded on this theme when he spoke to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. “I wish I had a magic wand and could make this all happen on my own,” he said. But then he noted, “But we live in a democracy, and at the end of the day, I can’t do this all by myself under our democratic system.”

Just to make sure that all of the politicians present understood what he meant, the former professor of Constitutional law added, “If we’re going to do big things — whether it’s passing this jobs bill, or the DREAM Act, or comprehensive immigration reform — we’re going to have to get Congress to act.”

But as I said, that was then, this is now. And now Obama needs all the Latino votes he can get. So, a few days ago, he decided to heck with Congress and our Constitution; he’d just issue an edict to change the rules.

Effective immediately, the President said, the United States would no longer try to deport any young people who are in this country illegally. If they were brought to this country as children and are not yet 30 years old, they’ll get a free pass for the next two years. The only stipulations are that they have no criminal record and have completed high school, earned a GED diploma or served in the military.

No one knows for sure how many illegals will benefit from the new rule, but estimates are that the number could be as high as 800,000. And no one knows how many votes this ploy will garner the President in November, but it could be several million.

So, once again, we have the disturbing specter of the President of the United States — the Numero Uno government official who, per the Constitution, is responsible for seeing that Federal laws are fully and fairly enforced — blithely announcing that he is going to ignore the law of the land and do whatever he wants.

Of course, this isn’t the first time such a thing has happened. It isn’t even the fourth or fifth time it’s happened. It’s been a hallmark of Obama’s Administration almost from his first year in office, when he said that the Federal government would not enforce the Defense of Marriage Act.

Right now, the Justice Department is waging war on officials in Florida because the Governor there wanted the election rolls purged of any people who are not legal residents of this country. That sounded pretty reasonable to me. But I guess someone in Washington realized that a lot of those illegal aliens were voting for Democrats, so maybe the Florida officials should be stopped.

Oh, and don’t you dare suggest that it is reasonable and proper for potential voters to be asked to prove that they are really who they say they are before being given a ballot. Never mind that you can’t board an airplane, buy alcohol or order a prescription without showing legal identification. Voter ID laws, we’re told, are the worst sort of discrimination since Jim Crow laws were rampant in the South.

Another example of the Obama Administration’s delight in flouting our laws was the so-called bailout of General Motors and Chrysler. Rather than following the traditional rules of bankruptcy, Obama’s car czar rigged the game. Bondholders had billions of dollars stolen from them and given to the Democrats’ friends in the United Auto Workers union.

By the way, it’s not just us crazy right-wingers who are saying this. In “Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws,” Politico reported: “On issue after issue — gay rights, drug enforcement, Internet gambling, school achievement standards — the administration has chosen to achieve its goals by a method best described as passive-aggressive.”

I disagree. Acts like these aren’t merely passive-aggressive. They are flagrantly unConstitutional!

At the top of the list of Obama’s defiant flouting of our Constitution, though, has to be his eagerness to wage war. He is not alone in this, of course. The last time a President asked Congress for a declaration of war before committing our troops to fight and die was after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. But the fact that every President since then has ignored the Constitution doesn’t make it right.

Every schoolchild in America is taught that we are supposed to be a Nation of laws, not the whims of men. Does anyone really believe this anymore? How can we, with the example being set by the scofflaw in our Nation’s highest office?

Meanwhile, we wait in vain for our Senators and Representatives to demand a halt to this unConstitutional usurpation of their powers. Every single one of them took an oath of office to “protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States.

Maybe they should be required to read it, so they’ll have a better idea of what their job is supposed to be — and just how blatant this theft of their responsibilities has become. If they won’t, then it’s up to us to replace them this November with people who will — beginning with the guy in the White House.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood

Chip Wood

is the geopolitical editor of PersonalLiberty.com. He is the founder of Soundview Publications, in Atlanta, where he was also the host of an award-winning radio talk show for many years. He was the publisher of several bestselling books, including Crisis Investing by Doug Casey, None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham and The War on Gold by Anthony Sutton. Chip is well known on the investment conference circuit where he has served as Master of Ceremonies for FreedomFest, The New Orleans Investment Conference, Sovereign Society, and The Atlanta Investment Conference.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “King Obama Flouts The Law Again”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • James

    I believe the most devastating years we’ve had are the 8 years of ‘W’ Bush. He helped to orchestrate the 9/11 mess, started the endless wars in the Middle East, borrowed more money and plunged us farther in debt than any other president. Obama will probably exceed that but he hasn’t yet.

  • PooPoo

    I guess Grandpa Ovomit can’t remember what he says…Does this mean he’s losing his mind…?

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      He speaks with so much double talk that if B.S. was snow, he’d make a blizzard. Then he lies and changes his mind. So whatever he says is meaning less.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        According to George Orwell’s book “1984″, it’s called “doublespeak”. Better get used to it.

  • http://Yahoo Rob

    Obama rocks the boat again and the SHEEPLE just sit back and complain…….just follow along…..NO outcry…..NOT seen …. NOT heard….JUST…. follow along and just complain some more!! WHEN ARE THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY GOING TO WAKE UP!!!!

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      Including you? Why don’t you get it started? I’ll sign it.

  • Robert

    Birds of a feather… Obama steps on the Constitution and promises illegals a green card, and Mitt Romney tells them that IF they graduate college with a special degree he will personally ” staple ” a green card to their deploma”. My God, what has this country come to? We have two choices this november, scratch that, we have one choice this november and Romney is acting like an Obama clone. Well like they say: a leopard doesn’t change it’s spots, and Romney being an ex-democrat (if you can believe that) hasn’t changed his core beliefs either. God help us all.

    • cathy

      Robert, you have put into words my exact thoughts. WHO do we vote for? I have said that all along. We surely do need Gods’ help. seriously!!! Time to act all you Christians!!! You know what to do…PRAY!!!!!

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        My thoughts exactly!

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      Amen! Unless he is just lying for votes.

  • Norm

    Pure politics. Don’t these clowns have something to do?
    How about jobs, taxes,national deficit,social security,Medicare, etc. etc……

    • momo

      They’re too busy pandering for votes, Norm.

  • Herb Koch

    All you guys do is talk. If you really want to do something, make a STRONG call for impeachment of Obama, and get hundreds of thousands of the American People behind this. When the American people speak in force, and force our lazy, passive congressmen to do this. When he is replaced with a Real Ametican .President,.oop

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      Start the petition. I’m anxious to sign it.

  • peggy

    if we try impeachment, obummer could turn out to look like a martyr. secondly, the demogods might put hillary on the ballot. i think she could be the greater evil, as she is smart. the bum has a puppeteer who is smart. the bum has difficulty reading his teleprompter.

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      Oh yes, Hillary, the one that signed an arms agreement with the UN. I didn’t get to vote on it. She needs to be fired.

      • Ted Crawford

        She will be Patrick, on November 6, 2012, and FINALLY removed from ANY office on January 20, 2013 ! !

      • Karolyn

        Ted – Did you not see where Hilary said she does not want the job after the election? She’s quitting, not being fired. Wish she was running!

      • Ted Crawford

        Yes Karolyn, I’m aware that she said that. I’m also aware that she is an avowed Progressive and that her lips were moving at the time ! I rest my case.

      • Sanders

        Ted, LOL! you hit the nail directly on the center of the head. She doesn’t want the job until she knows obummer is out of the way because she knows he will steal her out of it again. She will throw her hat in the ring in 2016, rest assured, she loves POWER!

  • roger gunderson

    We the people need to take action and change our constitution. The way our founders set it up is to vague with to many loop holes and not enough enforcement by the people to keep our Government in check. The way it is now, it takes a massive amount of organizing ,effort, money to try to correct what is unconstitutional. People tell me the constitution is just fine but needs to be enforced. I’m saying then why isn’t it working. We the people need more teeth and a way of swift action and not wait 4 years for an election or 10/15 years for an amendment.

    • Nadzieja Batki

      The Constitution is a very simple document if any man intends to follow it. If a man starts looking for loopholes he is already showing himself to be a lawbreaker.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      There are NO loopholes in the constitution! It clearly says what it means! The problem is, there are people who don’t like freedom. They want to “interpret” the constitution to mean what they want it to mean. They want to control other people, tell them how to live. The constitution clearly does not allow for that, hence they need to interpret it to say what they want. The Constitution of the United States needs to be upheld! Those who take an oath to uphold the constitution and don’t, should be punished!

  • Flashy

    “Rather than following the traditional rules of bankruptcy, Obama’s car czar rigged the game. Bondholders had billions of dollars stolen from them ”

    Errrr…just what exactly would they have gotten if the auto companies had gone completely under and become non existent? Oh…the same.

    Golly …. the auto companies are saved, millions of jobs saved, a very important heavy manufacturing base kept intact, bondholders get what they would have gotten. That’s bad …

    Loss of important heavy manufacturing base, millions of jobs lost, bondholders still get what they would have gotten. That’s good.

    Wow …

    • momo

      Yeah, Obama screwed the bondholders and paid off his UAW buddies. You are one ignorant human being Flash!

    • Sanders

      And the sorry a$$ management practices that got them in this position in the first place can now resume until they run out of money again. If these 2 poorly managed companies would have filed bankruptcy and reorganized as all other bankrupt non-union companies before them have had to do, then they could have emerged a leaner stronger manufacturer. This leaner stronger company would then be able to pay the stockholders what is righfully theirs. Capitalism is great when left alone by the thugacrats. But no, we had to bail them out and give the company to the union because that will ensure their vote for him in 2012.

      • Flashy

        Sanders…one question…with credit completely missing from the economy as we were in the midst of the largest crash since the 1929 Depression, thus if the companies would have gone into an 11 they would not have survived as there was no financing or credit available anywhere….how would they have been able to ‘reorganize”?

        Jeesh …

      • Searcher4851

        Flashy-

        The same way Chrysler did, buy getting money from someone that thought it was still a viable business entity. GM’s problem was that as things stood at the time, they were not economically viable. A true bankruptcy reorganization would have made them so. It just wouldn’t have gotten Obama more votes going the normal route. Why can’t you admit he was just trying to buy votes?

      • Flashy

        Again…let me type this slowly so y’all can read it.

        Just how was GM going to get the necessary credit and financing to survive an 11 filing? Even Fiat required US loan guaranties to pull off the purchase of Chrysler.

        Remember the times…and remember, GM had not weeks, but quite literally days to act after credit everywhere went “poof” … .

      • Brad

        Flashy so let them fall where the chips land. If it were you or I no one would bail us out. They screwed themselves with crappy cars and building an over abundance of trucks in a time of high fuel prices. It is called mismanagement. I sure could use a baliout before I have to lat of my people to. I did nothing to dereve this, they did. Sorry a thousand wokers in US would lose their jobs and a bunch more around the world. Not yours or my problem, it happens.

    • Searcher4851

      Flashy – once again you ignore the facts to make your point.
      The auto industry was not at risk, only GM was. Ford got NO help and was doing quite well actually.
      The equity held by the shareholders and bondholders was merely transferred to the unions, which had no equity stake in the first place. The other losses were transferred from GM to the American people.

      • Flashy

        Searcher…how convenient you fail to know the facts and the situation involved. You place the usual anti American spin on the deal, ignoring the only way to have pulled it off was the way it went down. Ford came out stating with the loss of suppliers and jobbers as well as the complete collapse of both Chrysler and GM simultaneously, Ford would have likely closed its US operations .

        Nice try…didn’t work, but nice try.

      • Searcher4851

        Flashy-
        I stated facts, you are giving speculation and conjecture and calling it fact. Which suppliers and jobbers closed? answer-NONE Chrysler was somehow miraculously saved without the car czar, the free market saved them. Spin it any way you want, but the facts are the facts regardless of your conjecture and not wanting it to be so.

      • Flashy

        You’re spinning like a top Searcher. Of course suppliers and jobbers didn’t close. BECAUSE THE PURCHASERS DIDN’T GO UNDER!

        Chrysler had to agree to be bought by Fiat, and the US gave guaranties to allow Fiat to garner the financing for the purchase…guaranties mind you…not money out of our pocket. In return, Fiat had to agree to keep plants in the US…

        GM was in a world of hurt, and the only way to curvive was with the package finally negotiated and worked out. Cost to US taxpayers…negligible with monies paid back. Now…before you go off ranting, try walking around Michigan and tell folks GM should have gone under. See how far that gets you.

        Bondholders got exactly what they would have gotten had GM shut down. Shareholders also received what they would have if GM shut down. The unions gave up a significant portion of their contract in exchange for a seat at management table.

        So…just how is any of that bad?

      • Searcher4851

        Flashy-
        Again you engage speculation and purport it to be fact. According to your scenario, the czar’s way or completely out of business were the only possibilities in your little model, completely ignoring the NORMAL bankruptcy reoganization proceedure the thousands upon thousands of other corporations have undergone, and emerged from better than ever. FACT
        I don’t need to walk around Michigan and tell folks GM should have gone under, because it didn’t have to, and also because I’m not seeking votes like Obama is. FACT
        I’m not sure what you are talking about as far as the union giving things up. Did they give up their pensions? Did they give up their work rules? Did they give up being the highest paid auto workers? All I know for sure they gave up was NOT being major equity holders in the company. FACT
        Bondholders and shareholders, many of whom were taxpayers, lost a bundle in the scam, so taxpayers lost money. FACT
        But since you probably weren’t in either one of those catagories, I can see how you would coinsider nothing was bad about that, especially if it got your hero and savior some more votes.

      • Flashy

        Flashy-
        Again you engage speculation and purport it to be fact. According to your scenario, the czar’s way or completely out of business were the only possibilities in your little model, completely ignoring the NORMAL bankruptcy reoganization proceedure the thousands upon thousands of other corporations have undergone, and emerged from better than ever. FACT
        ———
        OK Searcher…here’s a fact for you to chew on. Credit availability in 2009. It was non existent. When you can answer how GM was going to obtain the credit and financing necessary to come out of a Chapter 11, you should be working on Wall Street. Credit lines and financing had gone “poof” with the Bush Crash. It did not exist…plain, simple FACT. Here’s another fact for you to chew on…if you don’t have the financing and credit already in place when going Chapter 11, you don’t survive. Chapter 11 requires the debtor to show likelihood of survivability.
        =================
        I don’t need to walk around Michigan and tell folks GM should have gone under, because it didn’t have to, and also because I’m not seeking votes like Obama is. FACT
        ————————–
        Please explain why it didn’t have to without government intervention. You first have to overcome the above issue with lack of credit and financing enabling GM to file and survive an 11. Today? yes…GM could do an 11 and survive if the same condition of the company existed…because today there is financing and credit available. Remember the times Sparky.
        ===================
        I’m not sure what you are talking about as far as the union giving things up. Did they give up their pensions? Did they give up their work rules? Did they give up being the highest paid auto workers? All I know for sure they gave up was NOT being major equity holders in the company. FACT
        ———————————–
        Granted the union received more of a pension payback than would normally had been the case in a regular 11. GM had underfunded the pensions and those were wayyyy underwater. Soemthing like $20-23 Billion. Under normal BK rules, the likelihood was the UAW Pension fund would have gotten back something like $10 Bil. With the deal cut, it came out to 50%. So instead of being shafted by $13 bil, the pension fund was shafted by about $10 Bil or so…

        There is a No Strike Clause now. And, what you tout as a giveaway to the union…ownership and seats on the board, i see as a burden to the union.

        First, in re; GM..the union does not hold shares or have an ownership stake. A health care trust fund for the Pension has a stake, along with the secured AAA paper bondholders. With Chysler, the union holds an ownership stake. In neither does the union hold majority ownership. FACT. Now…thi places the union is a very uncomfortable situation. In having seats on the Board, it holds a fiduciary duty to shareholders. It also must wear two hats come contract time … one of company/shareholders/bondholders, one of union. Finally…it can no longer point to mismanagement as a reason it should not cede wage and benefit demands.
        =======================
        Bondholders and shareholders, many of whom were taxpayers, lost a bundle in the scam, so taxpayers lost money. FACT
        ————–
        Here I am confused. They gained and lost exactly what they would have gained or lost in a Chapter 11 under normal circumstances of credit and financing availability. How were they injured by the government assistance ?
        ==================
        But since you probably weren’t in either one of those catagories, I can see how you would coinsider nothing was bad about that, especially if it got your hero and savior some more votes.
        ——————————–
        What “harm” did it do? I guess in your eyes saving a significant heavy manufacturing capability, saving millions of jobs, keeping the auto industry American, and giving a much needed boost and sense of stability to the US economy are bad….

      • JeffH

        Searcher4851, overall it’s best to ignore falsy as much as possible…he’ll get you into frivilous exchanges that will change the course of the author’s article…we all stray but falsy is paid to change the direction and he’s good at it with those that are unfamiliar with him or his mentor Saul Alinsky.

        I’ll refer you to his modus operandi:

        Rules for Radicals By Saul Alinsky – 1971
        “the organizer…working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth — truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing….”

        “And so the guided questioning goes on without anyone losing face or being left out of the decision-making. Every weakness of every proposed tactic is probed by questions…. Is this manipulation? Certainly….”

        “The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns…. All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.”

        Rule 4 – “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this…”
        Rule 8 – “Keep the pressure on…”
        Rule 10 – “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.”
        http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

      • RichE

        JeffH, Two of the signs of insecurity: Appearing authoritative and seeking approval.

      • JeffH

        RichE, TROLL!

      • RichE

        JeffH, Some bible verses to help you overcome your Insecurity

        Philippians 4:6-9 ; 1 John 4:18; Ephesians 6:10-20 ; 1 Corinthians 10:13

      • JeffH

        TROLL

      • RichE

        JeffH, Does saying the same word over and over help with your insecurities? Seriously. you are text book. Google it and get some help. You’ll feel better.

      • JeffH

        RichE in a nutshell:

        The Internet doesn’t have ancient slimey stone bridges, but trolls lurk around in quiet corners of the internet; while they can pop up almost anywhere, they thrive in distant relatively uninhabited corners.

        Trolls don’t have friends. On the internet, because they interact with human beings, they can convince themselves that they are important, the centre of the universe – that, to them, is better than any friendship. Don’t forget, the troll thinks he is always right, and therefore better than other folk. In real life, exactly the opposite applies. the troll has no friends and virtually no interaction with other people.

        If he’s a teen (many are), then he lives in his bedroom, trolling, playing computer games with ‘friends’ (who he doesn’t know at all), and joining roleplay sites, where – of course – he is a hero, or a powerful villain, who is respected in an inverse ratio to the respect he feels for himself.

        If he’s an adult, then he has serious social issues. He may work, where people think he’s a weirdo, and avoid him, he may sponge off his parents or be ‘looking for work’, which means he blames everyone for his problems. Except himself.

        It would be easy to dismiss trolls as mentally ill. Easy and wrong. Most would not score significantly on mental illness assessments. But most are simply immature. Fair enough in a teenager, and they have a chance of growing out of it (though the longer they leave it, the harder they may find it to break the habit). But in adults, it’s simply sad.

        Once upon a time, they would have been called ‘inadequate psychopaths’; attention seeking loners, forever feeling sorry for themselves, but too bone idle to lift themselves out of their self-selected mire. Some live in a fantasy world, and find it hard to concentrate on real life; they can’t make eye contact, and will say just about anything, frequently contradicting a previous statement.

        Trolls have no self respect and low self esteem, and cannot cope with normal human interaction; start with a bit of flattery, and they may be stuck for a response. Even if they recover, they will not able to react appropriately, which should convince everyone of their trollism.

        Trolls focus on their target, not the issue; additonally, most trolls can only pick on one person at a time. This leaves them wide open to paralysis when you talk about them, but not to them.

      • JeffH

        We’re done………

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      Most of our jobs have been moved to China. Perhaps a 20% tariff would help bring some back and also pay down our National Debt. Our debt is just that, OURS.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      Flashy, obummer DID steal GM from its rightful owners and gave it to the union. If he had not GM would have surely reorganized and the true owners would have had something rather than nothing! And you talk about the millions of jobs that were saved 8 out of 10 of GM’s jobs are in China. So it’s really nice that obummer saw fit to use OUR tax dollars to save China’s jobs! Let’s see, who came out ahead? The unions and the big shots at GM and the communist Chinese government! great deal?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvl5Gan69Wo&feature=youtu.be

      • Flashy

        Nancy..when you know what you speak of, let me know will you? See my response to Searcher above…

    • Power To The People

      Once again Flashman, your facts are wrong. The car industry is not saved…they just postponed the eventual collapse. The unions were handed 40% of the company and not one cent of their pensions now or in the future were touched. The pensions total over $45B and growing. I give them two years before they will be back for more and Obummer lovers proclaim another false victory.

  • http://facebook cllemens hacker

    Obama is still cleaninng up the mess Bush left behind. I am still going to vote for Obama,
    so he can still can keep on cleaning up the mess.

    • peggy

      u r a sad excuse for an american. perhaps u r NOT american. perhaps u r like obummer and r simply here to try and take down the U.S.A. it will not go easily. Americans love this country and will FIGHT for it.

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      Forget Clinton and Bush, This guy has sent billions to our enemies and has no idea of how to correct his own mistakes.

    • Power To The People

      Too much MSNBC hacker? Yea boy…its all W’s fault! Lost my phone this morning….its W’s fault!

  • Flashy

    “blithely announcing that he is going to ignore the law of the land and do whatever he wants.” Really? Since it is within his powers, isn’t he adhering to the law using executive authority to unjam the logjam created by a minority in Congress using the rules to frustrate needed reform desired by a majority of Americans?

    The result is no job losses, no jobs being taken away (they are already employed, already in existing jobs). Does it not force those who are criminally violating the laws via tax evasion, workplace safety, and contributions to SSI etc? i.e employers who knowingly employ undocumented workers and evade their legal and moral obligations.
    ———
    ABC and MSNBC News —>

    President Obama’s decision to relaxes rules for younger illegal immigrants was proceeded by a letter two weeks ago from nearly 100 law professors backing his plan to use prosecutorial discretion.

    “Dear Mr. President,” the letter stated, “there is clear executive authority for several forms of administrative relief.” They outlined the route President Obama announced today called “deferred action” for potential DREAM Act beneficiaries.

    They said it “can prevent an individual from being placed in removal proceedings, suspend any proceedings that have commenced, or stay the enforcement of any existing removal order.”

    “Though no statutes or regulations delineate deferred action in specific terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that decision to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely with the authority of the Executive.”

    The principal drafter of the letter was Hiroshi Motomura, a Professor of Law at UCLA School of law.

    • Searcher4851

      Flashy,
      You state that the majority of Americans are in favor of it, then go on to cite an article about 100 law professors writing a letter in favor. Curious conclusion you drew. From 100 law professors (not even the majority of THEM) to the majority of Americans? Oops, I forgot your motto: ‘never let the facts get in the way of a good argument’.

      • Flashy

        Searcher…one statement concerned the support of the people for the action. the other concerned his powers allowing action and it not being in violation of law.

        Two different areas..not just one.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      Flashy, quit making stuff up! You stated that a minority in congress was creating a logjam. If it were a minority there would be no logjam and obummer’s law would have passed. It is the MAJORITY in congress who will not pass the dream act. You stated that the majority of Americans want the dream act passed. Again, you are just making stuff up! You say it would result in no job losses. Just think how many more jobs there would be for unemployed Americans if we sent the “illegal” aliens back to the countries they are from! All immigration should be suspended for the time being. We are struggling to take care of American citizens. Now is not the time to be taking on additional people when we can’t even employ our own!

      • Flashy

        nancy having math issues –> You stated that a minority in congress was creating a logjam. If it were a minority there would be no logjam and obummer’s law would have passed. (errrr…when i went to school, less than 50% was a minority. braking a filibuster requires a Supermajority..almost impossible to attain these days) It is the MAJORITY in congress who will not pass the dream act. (errrr…41 out of 100 is a “majority”? And you went to school where?)

        You stated that the majority of Americans want the dream act passed. Again, you are just making stuff up! (yep. All reputable polls show just that)

        You say it would result in no job losses. Just think how many more jobs there would be for unemployed Americans if we sent the “illegal” aliens back to the countries they are from! (job losses Nancy. No jobs would be lost with the Executive Order. ).

        All immigration should be suspended for the time being. (ignorance speaks)

        We are struggling to take care of American citizens. Now is not the time to be taking on additional people when we can’t even employ our own! (i’d be talking with your GOP rep if i were you asking why they aren’t passing Job Creation bills. And i’d ask just how giving someone who is wealthy a tax break creates immediate jobs now…since that path has not worked in the past)

      • Sanders

        Flushy, our Reps have passed jobs bills, over 30 of them actually and now they sit in the senate not even being brought up to vote on, Reid is holding them back because he’s afraid some of them might actually pass and make him and the rest of the democraps look bad, including your beloved obummer. Obummers jobs bills would do nothing but prop up the public sector unions, like we need more of that.

  • Chester

    I see a bunch on here who would lock up all kids simply because their parents had committed some crime, no conviction necessary. All Obama did in this case was to give the PROSECUTION some guidelines on how to do what they were already doing, executing THEIR privilege concerning who they would prosecute and who they would wave their fairy wands and say “go free, my child, go free,” He hardly exceeded his authority on this, as he IS head of the justice department, just as he is head of the military and all other departments simply by the office he holds. Granted, there ARE people in place to run these departments, but when the president makes a suggestion, they generally listen. And it makes no difference there WHO the president is, the office makes a request, you do your best to comply.

    • Flashy

      Chester…you have to keep in mind…these are folks who say Obama is out to get their guns and cite the fact he is not anti gun is proof he is. …it’s a conspiracy to lull the 2nd Amendmenders to become unguarded so he then can take away their guns.

      remember the mindset we’re dealing with here…common sense, intelligence and logic are the enemies…

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        If obummer ISN’T bent on getting our guns then why are he and hilary so eager to get the un’s small arms treaty passed? Why would he cede our constitutional right to bear arms to the un? A conspiracy theory is not a theory if it’s true. Sometimes it’s just a conspiracy!

      • Flashy

        A couple of items…have you read the UN Small Arms treaty? What does it actually state ?

        If passed by the UN, since we have to sign it for it to begin the confirmation process, has anyone stated the US would sign it?

        What are the odds of it receiving Senate approval?

        Just minor issues of course. yet…good for a rant eh?

    • Bigjim29

      Anyone in this Country without a visa or Application for citizenship are here illegally. This is a Federal felony. Obama is doing this to get the Hispanic vote and for no other reason. He is doing the same thing here that he is doing by not allow voter ID or purging of non registered voters from the voter roll. Obama is trying to steal another election, as he did with Accorn in the last election.

      • Flashy

        Big Jim…The immigration laws are civil in nature. It is not a criminal act to be here without proper documentation. Nice try, but you know not what you talk about.

      • JeffH

        FALSY again shows why he has “no credibility” and still continues to post outright lies.

        8 U.S.C. § 1325 : US Code – Section 1325: Improper entry by alien
        (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection;
        misrepresentation and concealment of facts
        http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/II/VIII/1325

      • JeffH

        FALSY lies again!

        8 U.S.C. § 1325 : US Code – Section 1325: Improper entry by alien
        (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection;
        misrepresentation and concealment of facts

        http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/II/VIII/1325

      • JeffH

        falsy, do you really think everybody is so ignorant…willing to take your word for anything? You know and the rest of us know you are a pathalogical and intentional liar.

    • Searcher4851

      Flashy-
      You are the one that as usual doesn’t know what you’re talking about.

      Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,” any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

      Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or

      Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or

      Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;
      has committed a federal crime.

      Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Good one, Searcher! Flashy just makes stuff up!

      • Flashy

        Sigh…that’s crossing the border and concerns the act of entry (Improper Entry by Alien). How about looking up the code for being in the country without a visa ?

      • Searcher4851

        Flashy-
        I’m typing this slowly so maybe you’ll be able to understand. They didn’t just magically appear here one day, they ENTERED this country. The fact that they are still here illegally is ANOTHER offense. duhhhhhh

      • Flashy

        Searcher…I also am typing this very slowly so maybe you can catch on. Being here without documentation is a civil violation. If one comes under a visa, and the visa expires, they are here without proper documentation…such is not a criminal situation. If they have no visa, it is the burden of the state to prove they violated criminal statutes in arriving here. One may be in the US without proper documentation and not be prosecutable.

        Something like 30% of undocumented aliens in this country are from countries other than Mexico, Central America and S. America. Knock off Central America and S. America, and almost exactly half are from countries other than Mexico.

        Now…just how do you suppose they originally entered the US ?

      • Brad

        They entered through Mexico (expletive deleted)!!

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Flashy, I bet all those illegals from Mexico had visas. Riiiiiiight! There you are making up crap again!

      • JeffH

        falsy, you are a straight up liar! You have absolutley no credibility at all.

        Illegal Immigration is a Crime.
        Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,” any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

        Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or

        Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or

        Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;
        has committed a federal crime.

        Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.
        ________________________________________________
        In addition to sneaking into the country in violation of the immigration law that requires that aliens be documented for legal entry (referred to as “entry without inspection — EWI”), others enter with legal documentation and then violate the terms on which they have been admitted by taking jobs that are not authorized or overstaying the authorized period of stay in the country. The INS estimated in 1996 that about 60 percent of the then estimated five million illegal immigrants were EWI and 40 percent were overstayers. Both types of illegal immigrants are deportable under Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 (a)(1)(B) which says:
        “Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States is deportable.”

        Also…Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
        Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)
        “Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”

        Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

        A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:

        * assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or

        * encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or

        * knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

        Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

      • Flashy

        nancy….I refer to those who came here with a Visa and overstayed them. More than half of those who are currently here without proper documentation came here legally. Since they came here with proper documentation, they have broken no criminal law.

        Do you get it now or do i have to use one syllable words next time?

      • JeffH

        Searcher4851, sorry about duplicating your post…it’s important that falsy is getting paid to spread his deceptive lies. His sole purpose for being here is to collect a paycheck and disrupt this website.

      • Sanders

        Flushy, Where are your facts that roughly half of the illegals in this country are stayovers? I bet you have none, as usual. If you really did watch Fox news once in a while you might actually get a glimpse of the never ending long line of illegals working their way through the deserts of their bordering southern states. Of course you’re not going to see this on the Liberal news outlets of cnn, mslsd(that’s msnbc), nbc, cbs, abc, etc.

    • Power To The People

      Put down the kool aid Chester…he did it for votes.

  • Rhesa Cook

    Yes, obama is getting away with whatever he wants because our CONGRESS IS LETTING IT HAPPEN!!!! THEY JUST SIT THERE AND DRAW THE GOOD PAY AND LOOK THE OTHER WAY. Yesterday the news said that they had not voted on anything for a long time. Don’t they realize our country is in PERIL????

    • R Classen

      We should send each one a little cap with a weather vane on it. Whichever way the political wind is blowing today………………

    • Bigjim29

      It is the Senate, namely Harry Reid allowing this to happen. There are over 30 bills sent to the Senate by the House that Reid will not allow a vote on. It is Obama and Reid that will not allow anything to come to a vote, so Obama can say the Republicans are not doing anything to help the people. Reid has not allowed a vote on a budget for 3 years and they want to blame the Republicans for there political manuvers.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        It isn’t just Reid. It is BOTH parties. They’re playing political games. Frankly I’d rather pay them to just stay home! We have way too many laws and most of them don’t benefit us at all! Lately, it seems the laws they’re making are just taking away our constitutional rights!

    • Power To The People

      So right you are. Congress is a club of power brokers bidding themselves out to the highest payer and most corrupt cause. They all should be impeached for ignoring their oath of office. Sorry….we can’t touch them as they are immune to most of our laws.

      Wait a minuet, we could get the AG to go after them…you know….that checks and balances thing. Oh, I forgot, the AG is in trouble for lying to Congress! Darn…thought I had a plan.

  • Charlie

    Want the senators and the represenatives to wake up , all of them took an oath to uphold the constitution. So far all that has happened is a bunch of power crazed people looking to make money,keep their elected job working for us and they seem hell bent to totally screw up our country beyond repair. What a shame that these people can not see that doing their job with in the limits set forth in the constitution is the only correct way to do their job.
    Illegal in a nut shell means against the law.

  • John Beach

    Well, sometimes you just have to ride with the tide and go with the flow. That’s what the illegals did. Or, perhaps, they decided to come apart and be separate from the rest. Anyway, immigration is certainly in the best traditions of the U.S. and we should welcome them because they are willing to work and pay taxes, which is more than we can say for Americans who can’t get jobs or don’t want to get jobs or can’t compete and prefer to live off the taxpayer-funded entitlement checks they get for being what and who they are.
    There really are not that many people who want to be President, so, inspite of all the criticism, there is not much competition for the job at the top.

    • Vigilant

      “There really are not that many people who want to be President, so, inspite of all the criticism, there is not much competition for the job at the top.”

      And if the Marxists and statists called “the Democratic Party (what a misnomer)” have their way, no competion would be possible as Obama would have the job for life.

      • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

        It may be a very short life.

    • Nanci

      How do you pay taxes when you submit a bogus SS#? The ones I work with, get a check too, for each kid it goes up, so they are always pregnant. Also, a big percentage of their money is sent home to relatives, it doesn’t even stay in this country.

      • Flashy

        If you work at a place which you know employs undocumented workers…how is it you haven’t reported such? Are you not then, aiding and abetting? Are you not part of the problem you are complaining about?

      • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

        This is why “WE THE PEOPLE” (LIGALS) need to do somthing about the Lleigals in OUR country today. Not tomorrow.

    • rockdoc01

      Yes John we should welcome them, but expect them to do it legally by applying for work visas/green cards and have them pay taxes in this country in which they want to work. As it stands now, they just violate our immigration laws by walking across the border. My immigrant ancestors and I’m sure yours as well, did it the legal way – they came and became naturalized, were processed according to the law, and became contributing members of our society.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      Pay taxes?!? Apparently you didn’t hear the news a couple of months ago that told how the “illegal” aliens were getting $30,000 tax refunds from the IRS for sons, daughters, nieces, and nephews they had down in Mexico! They didn’t even have to prove the children existed. This was not $30,000 altogether. It was $30,000 EACH!!! So I don’t think the taxpayers are getting a good deal here!

      • Nancy in Nebraska
      • Brad

        $30,000 is the propsed number Billary is trying to get a new treaty for, but that is for every child in 3rd world counties around the world.

      • Sanders

        WOW! This link needs to go viral. Everybody in the USA needs to see this. Thanks for the link, I have already shared it with about 10 of my friends and family members and asked them to spread it around like obummers taxes on the rich.

  • faye

    This is the biggest liar and thief to be in the WH I have ever seen and Im way over 50yrs and we need to get rid of this bum who wants to be a dictator not a president which he is not a president in my book but all I can say for him he is a lying thief piece of trash

    • Patriot II

      The only way to get this guy out of office is the pull the plug on the media, API, ABC,CBS NBC, CNN, MSN.

      If we only had Fox news this country would get rid of this guy in less than a month, in fact he never would have been elected.

      • Karolyn

        So…You advocate Fascism in the name of conservatism? Best laugh I’ve had yet today! :-) Talk about misguided logic!

      • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

        Hay Patriot II, Did not you know that API,ABC,C.B.S.,C.N.N.,and M.S.N., are ALL OWNED by a saudi prince. That’s why we get the news that we get. “O” is one of their puppets. So what else do you think you will get?

      • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

        The only way to get unbiased news is to listen to the BBC.

      • Nadzieja Batki

        Patriot II, you are a phony plain and simple. The only people who would advocate eliminating all media outlets would be the Leftists/Socialists/Liberals/Democrats/etc. with the Fascists thrown in. After all media is eliminated and suppressed then only one would be created for your benefit.

      • Power To The People

        What do you advocate Karolyn? You snip at other’s posts but you rarely say anything of substance. So where are your allegiances?

      • Average Joe

        Patrick Tiekamp,
        “The only way to get unbiased news is to listen to the BBC”

        Actually, the only way to get unbiased news…is through due dilligence and lot’s of research.
        15 second soundbites are not news…regardless of who is putting it out….always investigate the “source’ of the story…and not the third party opinion of what was said or done in the story.

        Best wishes,
        AJ

  • M Cat

    …and what the the problem with Congress for that matter?? why arenmt they regularly jumping at every opportunity to at least try to fight this??

    • Vigilant

      You’re absolutely correct. The feckless, reckless, spineless and d**kless Congress has ALLOWED its Constitutional powers to be pilfered by arrogant and power-hungry presidents of all stripes for too long.

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      It’s money, everything is money, Pull your head out and smell the dung.

  • Patriot II

    Not King Obama, “BIG BRO” as in Orwell’s 1984

  • Gramma

    It was evident from day one of announcing his candidacy that we would have chaos abound, disregard for the law of the land, and downright anti-American rhetoric spewed from this person in the WH–his puppeteer was and is George Soros, and he has no use for America except for gaining riches at the expense of the middle class. The truth behind it is that they have no regard whatsoever for the “poor,” except for keeping them that way, under their control. Dumbed down Americans–voting for the ones who want to keep them that way! Sad thing is that too many “conservatives and christians” fell for the fraud.

    • Flashy

      Specifically, what law did he violate?

      • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

        His Oath of Office and avoiding the protocol laid out by our fore Fathers. What a display of ignorance. Read the Constitution so you know your rights and responsibilities as well as the same for others.

      • Flashy

        patrick..specifically…what law did he violate?

        And…as determined by ruling of the SCOTUS as to what the Constitution allows 9not some wacked out interpretation)…what part of the US Constitution was he ever in violation of?

      • Searcher4851

        Flashy-
        How about engaging in an ongoing criminal conspiracy to commit murder, illegal wepons trafficing, obstruction of justice, lying to federal investigators, and lying to Congress just for starters in the fast and furious case. Any ONE of those would have any of us normal humans in serious doo doo, but for your hero and savior, those are ok by your standards?

      • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

        You libs get your mind made up and nothing else matters. I’m happy for you that YOUR leader is such a Saint that you can’t see the errors of his ways. You are not open minded enough to be reasonable. No one should have to point out the obvious. End of conversation.

      • Power To The People

        Flashman, he is doing just what he promised to do in 2007 when he said, “damn the constitution”! It is clear you agree with his actions…..what a shame.

      • Flashy

        Searcher…has he done anything like that or is it your fantasy?

        Do you know what the citation for Contempt recommended by the Committee is for? And..note..it is only against Holder.

        But go ahead…explain where you’re coming up with these allegations…

    • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

      Gramma, I’ll bet you they won’t fall for that kind of C**p agine?

    • bolivar

      actually it was quite evident many months before the election that this Che wannabe was very very bad news

  • Rasta

    Good for him and good for the Latino population in the US. The congress of the US can’t seem to develop a fair immigation policy so the President has to do it himself.Hail to the Chief!

    • Diogenes

      Holy crap Rasta! It scares me that people like you breed & vote! Wake up and see what is happening to our country.

      • Rasta

        It’s people like you that make the “land of the free” mean “the land just for me” if you are white of course. This is just another of the Right’s end of the world predictions! Even Romney has softened his stand on immigation! I really hope you blow the hispanic vote and that they realize just who is their corner..

      • Charlie Tall

        Hey, Rasta! Land of the free doesn’t mean you get whatever you want for free. All I’m hearing from you is, “Gimme, gimme, gimme!”

      • Flashy

        Charlie…of the benefits you receive (and there are many), which would you give up?

      • Nadzieja Batki

        Rasta, why would you wish evil on this nation? To get revenge on it for some supposed slight that only occurred in your mind.

      • JeffH

        Rasta, you’d prefer the land of the “freebies”! BTW, do you ever have a problem with non-whites? Just askin’.

    • CJ

      I agree, the liberals seem to keep demanding more to bring this country down, and the right won’t bend anymore to the left. We are way left of middle ground, and the liberals are demanding MORE concessions?? It’s about time the liberals gave up some of THEIR demands and lets bring the whole thing back to center. The right needs to stand ground, they’ve given more than necessary to appease the whining left.

    • LAB

      Yo rasta-reject, stop smokin’ yer wackyweed and get a life! You must be a jammakin illegal, higher than a kite to be spewin’ your stupidity like that! (offensive comment removed)

    • Vigilant

      “The congress of the US can’t seem to develop a fair immigation policy so the President has to do it himself.Hail to the Chief!”

      Rasta, you are as unAmerican as they come. You are apparently ignorant (or worse, supportive of) the violation of) the Constitution of the United States. Only an idiot or a statist would advocate the hijacking of legislative powers by the chief executive.

      In your shortsided and dangerous thinking, you have no idea what such an attitude can lead to. Extrapolating your position, what would you say If a Republican president decides to appropriate the powers of Congress and overturn (or selectively enforce) whatever legislation he deems to be “unfair?” Be careful what you wish for.

      Our Constitutional Republic DEMANDS adherence to the rule of law, something you Marxists feel we can dispense with every time you encounter a law you feel is “unfair.” To believe and to act this way is to strike at the very heart of what it means to be American.

      “Despicable” is too kind a word to describe your position.

      • Rasta

        I am an American who realizes that your position is racist and I will call it just I see it. Your right wing Nazi propaganda is just that! Everyone that disagrees with your myopic view is labeled unamerican. Go right ahead it just emboldens me.

      • JeffH

        Rasta, excuse me a moment while I laugh at you…you’re so full of it you’re eyes are brown & yellow & red . Try to put thought into your comments rather than the pre-programmed rhetorical drivel you constantly put out. BTW, are you a big fan of Che Guerva?

        You just can’t be fixed.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL6wbsGx9qw

      • Average Joe

        Rasta (er…La Rasa)

        Your leftwing Rascist propaganda is just that (racist propaganda)! Everyone that disagrees with your myopic view is labeled unamerican and racist. Go right ahead it just emboldens us.
        What is wrong with immigartion?…Idiots like you make a perfect example….Nation Dividers…rather than Nation Uniters.

        Your Racism is showing…ewwww, that’s nasty…cover yourself.

        Best wishes,
        AJ

    • Charlie Tall

      True story.

      An example of what illegal aliens really mean to the country.

      In 2005 I started a business: mowing, landscaping, and excavating.

      I invested about $200,000 of my own money to buy equipment, acquire licenses, advertise, and so on.

      It was my policy to hire only legal workers. I.e., workers with social security numbers that matched their names, workers who were citizens, or workers who had real green cards.

      I paid my men $10 per hour, plus all the required benefits, taxes, accounting and reporting costs, and insurance. As a result, they cost me a real $15 per hour, plus a little for unanticipated expenses.

      I decided to bid jobs at cost the first year to get the business started and establish a reputation.

      Despite that, I was consistently outbid by my competition. The only jobs I got were the ones that they didn’t want.

      I later discovered that my competitors were employing illegal aliens to the exclusion of American workers.

      They, like me, were paying $10 per hour, but unlike me they were paying no Social Security, employing no accountants, buying no Workmen’s Comp or medical insurance. They picked-up their labor behind the bodega every morning and dropped them off every night. Their real cost was $10 per hour, 2/3-rds what I was paying.

      On top of that, their Mexicans went home with $10 for every hour worked, while my Americans averaged about $8 per hour because of withholding, FICA, and Medicare.

      One Friday evening, the daughter of one of my men got sick and was taken to the local hospital. When they discovered that he was employed, they demanded $200 in advance before they would treat his little girl. I know because I had to drive over to the hospital with the money; he didn’t have it.

      While we were there, a family of Hispanics came in: two adults and four little kids ranging from a babe-in-arms to maybe 7 at the oldest. They all had the sniffles. Guess what? They were treated for free, ahead of my guy’s kid. All the parents had to do was state that they were unemployed and too poor to pay for treatment; the hospital couldn’t refuse them, but it could refuse my gainfully employed American’s little girl.

      Here’s the irony. I recognized the father of this litter from one of my competitor’s jobs. He was the guy they used as a foreman because he spoke both English and Spanish. In other words, not only was he employed, but he made a lot more than my guy.

      Now I’ve heard about how our economy would collapse if we lost all these great Hispanic workers. That’s crap. If we didn’t have to pay for their education, medicine, special language demands, drunken behavior, violence, and filthy habits the country would probably be able to run with a revenue surplus.

      Jobs Americans won’t do? Crap! My phone ran constantly from AMERICANS calling to see if I had any jobs for them.

      Diversity? You can take diversity and stick it. I prefer employees who speak my language, follow instructions, and pay their way, which are qualifications most of the illegals lack.

      Ready for the final indignity? Since I was the new guy in town, the immigration people audited me twice in one summer. Each time they took almost a week of my time going through all of my employment records checking to make sure I hadn’t hired an illegal.

      My competitors? They simply did not keep employment records; they paid their workers in cash.

      The same people here who are bitching about how big business buys an unfair advantage with the government turn right around and demand special advantage for illegal aliens.

      You want to do the right thing, the fair thing? Make everyone – President Obama, AG Holder, the UAW, you, me, and the illegal alien – obey the law. Enforce the law equally for everyone. Black or white. Anglo or Hispanic. Male or female. Straight or gay. Young or old.

      That is what real equality is all about.

      • Flashy

        So the real criminals are the employers who hire undocumented workers, avoid taxes, and harbor ill gotten gains violating workplace safety and fair labor laws.

        As i have stated time after time…to halt the employment of undocumented workers, the solution is very simple, cheap, and easy.

        Those who knowingly or should have known use undocumented labor…they get to serve 60 days in the county clink. Any appeal is during time being served. Fines are easy to avoid or simply not pay or work out to be economically cheaper than to abide y the law. toss ‘em in the clink, and let the Mrs explain to the neighbors why “John” hasn’t been around to mow the lawn of late.

        What is the error in this proposal ? And ask yourself, why isn’t it being proposed?

      • Karolyn

        Charlie – When did this happen? I think things have changed more now with more eyes on businesses employing illegals, at least as far as larger businesses are concerned. There was a big expose of the chicken processing plants in NC a couple of years ago. As far as that hospital goes, a stink should have been raised right then and there. All hospitals HAVE to take care of ALL patients despite their financial condition. Had your employee just said he had no money, period, they would have taken care of his daughter. People need to stand up for their rights.

      • Rasta

        I’m sorry you business didn’t work out, but put the blame where it lies on your unscrupulous business competitors.

      • ktkoballa@yahoo.com

        Very good analogy of what is going on in our country. I wish everyone could read it.

      • Charlie Tall

        That’s what I wrote.

        Enforce the laws equally for everyone. Enforce them for the employers. Enforce them for the illegal aliens. Enforce them for the damned President and his crooked cronies.

        No special passes for anyone.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Charlie, thank you for sharing your story! It needed to be heard. I’m tired of hearing people say that they do jobs that Americans won’t do. I will add this: if we didn’t pay people to sit on their A$$es they would do whatever jobs were available! Hunger is a great motivator!

      • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

        I’m witness to what you’ve said.

      • Sanders

        Flashy, WOW! Was that really you or your evil twin Conservative talking? That is the first time I have read any of your posts that actually make any real sense at all. IT’s usually Liberal nonsense. Keep up the good work!

      • Sanders

        Nancy, I couldnt agree more. I see the lazy crap every day with some people I shamefully admit to know. It started with the mother who is my wifes age and now her son is doing the same thing. He has learned how to work the system so he sits on is dead a$$ all day and collects welfare checks because his 3 kids have been under educated and deemed as having ADHD or ADD. So he gets a SSI check for $600 for each of the 3 kids every month as well as free rent and food stamps. Why would he want to get a job when all this stuff is free???

      • Average Joe

        Charlie Tall ,
        Thank you for your post. This is something that needs to be spoken about more often. I tried the same thing here in Florida…and found the exact same problems that you found…I couldn’t compete with the companies that hired illegals….because they underbid me on every job that I bid on…even at cost. Unfortunately, our so-called Government is complicit… and they will not be happy until the United States achieves third world status.
        The progressives keep asking for equality for all…I am afraid they are going to get it…everyone will be poor and down trodden….equality….yay….
        The revolution approaches…may God have mercy on us all!

      • THG

        Fashy , this is one time I agree with you . i think empoyers that hire illegals should be fined or something. But at the same time when they catch a business owner employing these illegals , the illegals that were hired should be drop kicked back to where they came from . Do you agree with that or should we dust them off and continue to support them .

      • Deerinwater

        Karolyn says; “Charlie – When did this happen? I think things have changed more now with more eyes on businesses employing illegals, at least as far as larger businesses are concerned.”

        Sorry Charlie, but you were doomed to failure from the offset. Before investing that much, you should have checked your markets and competition . $200,000 is a lot to invest in low tech Manuel labor.

        You should at the very least had some contracts of some sized before jumping in head first.

        I rarely tell this story, because people really don’t care unless it’s happening to them.

        In 1986 the state of Texas mandated licensing and insuring of AC contractors. For those of us that complied, passed the testing, paying not only for the education but the test and then the annual fee plus the insurance we were rewarded by being stalked and hounded by the state for “administration infractions” for twenty years, ~ Failure to notify change of address to the state inside 30 day, = $300.00 penalty, failure to display State lic. # on work truck $500.00, Failure to include the states 1-800 number on you invoice $300.00, on and on it went for 18 years before the state started cracking down on unlicensed contractors. It was until they did, I could get a fair price for my work.

        When you as a business person are forced to compete with a man the works on the side, has no insurance coverage, no licenses and steals materials and supplies from his employer .

        By selection of which laws government elect to enforce makes winners and losers. While I quit being angry about this long ago, I’ll never forget it nor will i get my 18 years back.

        I hate to hear how you too have found out the hard way how state and local governments can crew you over and nobody seems to care.

    • Melody

      Idiot!!!!! Moron!!!!! Ignorant a..hole!!!!

      • Karolyn

        My, aren’t we articulate!

      • Average Joe

        Karolyn,

        or, as I like to say:
        Such language …from a supposedly…. winning adventurer……

        Best wishes,
        AJ

    • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

      Hay, moron, what are you going to do when its your turn to get in front of the crosshairs ? huh. Craw back into your hole.

      • Average Joe

        John The Baptist,
        Misnomer? I think John the Baptist is rolling over in his grave with you using his name…..
        Hay, moron? First off..it is Hey…not Hay…hay is what I feed to horses….and the next word is moron? (very un-civilized of you) Yes I am quite sure that John the Baptist is just thrilled that you are using his name. If you are going to use the name…please attempt to use civility along with it…otherwise…your hypocracy shows through.

        Best wishes,
        AJ

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      It’s more like hail to the thief. Lies are just someone stealing the truth.

    • rockdoc01

      we don’t need another damn immigration law, we need to enforce what we have.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        You said it!!!

    • Aubrey Mason

      Rasta,
      [Personal attack comment removed]

      Those 800,000 illegal’s?
      The money can come out of YOUR pocket! WE, do not want to pay for them!

      They got here illegally, they and their parents need to go – according to law.
      Our whole point is LAW. obama chose to attempt to get the Hispanic vote by doing this and if you are so ignorant you cannot see through this kind of ploy you deserve whatever you get.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      We already HAVE a fair immigration policy! It’s those who want to make their own policies that are the problem! Just because YOU don’t think it’s fair, doesn’t make it so! I think the law is more than fair. In fact, I think that immigration should be suspended for the time being. It is not in our country’s best interest to be adding people right now. We don’t even have enough jobs for our citizens right now. Bringing in more people to either take the available jobs OR be supported by our government programs is NOT what we need right now! Our immigration policy should NOT be based upon what is best for the Mexicans! It SHOULD be based upon what is best for AMERICANS!!!

      • Karolyn

        I don’t know what they big hoo-ha is right now, since more Mexicans are leaving the country than entering.
        http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/for-first-time-since-depression-more-mexicans-leave-us-than-enter/2012/04/23/gIQApyiDdT_story.html

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Not enough of them, Karolyn. All of the Mexicans need to go back to Mexico! We can’t even take care of our own people right now! Let Mexico take care of the Mexicans!

      • Average Joe

        Nancy in Nebraska ,

        “All of the Mexicans need to go back to Mexico! All of the Mexicans need to go back to Mexico! We can’t even take care of our own people right now! Let Mexico take care of the Mexicans!”

        That is what gets under my skin…rather than trying to fix their own country…they come here and destroy our country…. so that it becomes just like their own country of origin…. instead of trying progress…they choose to regress…..they can’t leave here fast enough for me…..

      • Average Joe

        Nancy in Nebraska
        My appolgies to you, I feel naked right now…
        I forgot to add…

        Best wishes,
        AJ

        (I’m slipping today)

        Best wishes,
        AJ

      • eddie47d

        Average Joe: You comments was rather flawed since the majority of immigrants came to America including our Founders because of failed policies back home. Yes Mexico should fix their own country …so should have all the others. If we sent everyone packing that came here looking for a better life this country would be almost vacant.

    • bolivar

      you and your RA Laza and MECHA types really tickle me with your childish starry eyed arguments. i’ve never ever heard any logial thoughts on the aftermath of your takeover by millions of babys. incredible that anyone would think it will be anything but a disaster. I escaped SOCAL in 2006 after 17 years. We watched the illegals destroy our area and turn it into a festering cesspool crawling with humans. sounds like the socialist pig in the white house is right up your alley. speaking of which, did you get your paper b–thole wet in the shower with juan this morning ?

    • Power To The People

      Not so fast Rasta….this is not a dictatorship! Oh wait a minuet…maybe it is. I am sure Karolyn and Flashman are excited!

    • Gunsmoke

      A__sshole Idiots like you don’t deserve to be in OUR COUNTRY, Illegals are plainly just that and enough said….. Do you have a problem understanding what that means ???? Apparently you must not Care or Know what this will cause and what the Price will be for us Americans…..which of course you could careless….. The Billions and Billions of Dollars it costs American Taxpayers each and every Year just to have Illegal Aliens in OUR COUNTRY is beyond comprehension, it’s so massive that the Deficit is only Equal to it…..but you DO NOT CARE, you only want to get your own share of it and let everyone who has to pay for it suffer…… YOU ARE A SCUMBAG and most likely an Illegal as well….
      Go back to your own Country and leave us alone, including your ridiculous comments…..
      GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!!

  • http://http//yahoo.com sophillyjimmy

    If Obama could ignore his oath of office then why would a Florida judge arrest George Zimmerman’s wife for perjury, an oath is an oath whether it pertatins to how much money a person stated they have for bail or if the president of the United States swears to uphold the Constitution of our Country. This president it totally out of control as well as his Attorney General and anyone in his cabinet
    If he gets away with breaking his oath time after time, he is setting a precident to all American’s that testify in court, people that get married or any other official who swears to uphold the laws of the land.
    Jus recently, the Chef of Police in Sanford Fl. was fired for failing to keep his oath to the people of Sanford so since no one is above the law, Obama’s blatent and constant refusals to adhear to the Constitution of our great country should be impeached immediately and he should also be placed in prison along with his lying criminal Atorney General Eric Holder.
    If he is not forced out of office, then our ogvernment whould be overthrown by We The People since this is our country and he is only our hired help.

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      This President is far overdue for Impeachment. Where is the petition? I want to sign it.

      • r.p.

        Unfortunately the power to present indictments for impeachment according to the constitution is given to members of both houses and the state legislators only. There-in lies the problem. The people have to petition their local representatives to begin the action(if your reps don’t take the action on their own volition), then our representatives have to act accordingly. If they fail in their duties then the people have the recourse to recall their reps and have a special election to either replace them or charge them with acts of sedition or treason. It is still up to the people to take the initial action, but not by kicking-n-screaming. I’ve said it many times before, it has to start in your own state, your own county, and your own district and conform to constitutional procedures. If your waiting for your representative to take the initial action………….Good Luck!

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      People in power lie, cheat and steal! They are never punished. They are held to a different standard than the rest of us!

    • susanm

      so does this mean we all can lie under oath, line every illegal, white, black, red, blue & ship them out, this is one thing i would pitch in, they came in with a bag, they go out with a bag, both parents a illegal their kids born here are illegal, this way we can CLEAN HOUSE. MY MONEY TO SUPPORT THESE’S PEOPLE, THEY WORK HERE AND SEND THE MONEY BACK HOME….ENOUGH IS ENOUGH………..

    • MRMO57

      Did Obummer swear the oath of office ?? I never saw it !! Remember he messed it up so bad that they had him do in privet off air .. So who can say for sure except for other questioniable people . I’ll bet he had his fingers crossed when he did it the second time, with that smug smile of his. A true IL. piece of Cr_ p !!!!

    • Karolyn

      MR057 – Obama did not mess up the oath, the justice did. Obama stumbled because the justice used the wrong wording.

  • Dave67

    Oh give me a break. The obstructionist GOP could have passed the dream act in 2010. But once again, power, ideology and party over country, they filibustered it in the Senate and like the completely worthless House of Representatives we have now, they did not allow it go move forward either. So Obama issues an executive order to deal with the issue sine the GOP is more interested in taking back the white house than getting anything done. Oh and King Bush the second had 6 of these types of orders to Obama’s 1. Where was the faux outrage then conservotrons?

    • Bendecido

      Let me see if I got this right. You are implying that you prefer a president who continually breaks the law than someone who goes legally through the proper channels. I am surprised that congress has not taken the first step to have him impeached. Those same illegals will be taking the jobs of the USA citizens who have a right to them. I can see that you vote straight liberal ideas no matter who it harms, including yourself. Wake up man and vote for someone who will do Ameria good. Do not complain when things go wrong with you economically or constitutionally. You get what you vote for.

      • Karolyn

        And who, in your opinion, “will do America good.”

      • eddie47d

        One thing I always say Bendecido is that it’s Conservative businesses who wants the cheap labor who are willing to break the law in bringing workers to America. If US citizens would line up at their corporate offices and demand those jobs (and be willing to work) then the problem would be solved. You have to sort out fact from fiction.

      • Flashy

        How did he “break the law” ? Were you this upset with bush II/Cheney when they DID break the law? Were you this upset when Reagan directly violated the law and traded with the enemy to fund an illegal and horrendously evil guerrilla outfit involved in killing women, children, priests etc in Nicaragua?

      • Opal the Gem

        Put a sock in it flushy (the only thing flashy about you is when you throw open your raincoat in front of the little kids). What Bush, Reagan, Clinton, or any other president did or didn’t do is old news. We are talking about the present and what obama is and isn’t doing.

      • JeffH

        OMG falsy, give it a rest. You’re Alinsky rants are old, grey and shriveled…booring.

      • Flashy

        Noted ..Opal and JeffH couldn’t specify any law violated by Pres. Obama…just worthless rants about made up stuff …

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

        Anyone who would allow us to start burning witches again there Broomhilda! LOL!!!

      • JeffH

        falsy, I have no intention of playing in your little games.

      • eddie47d

        All events are important Opal not just anti-Obama topics. Stop and listen to history and you might learn something.

      • Kate8

        OMG, “what laws has Obama broken?”

        What alternate universe are you living in, flash?

        It might be easier to find a law he HASN’T broken.

        Then again, maybe not.

      • phideaux

        “All events are important Opal not just anti-Obama topics. Stop and listen to history and you might learn something.”

        eddie I knew more when I out grew diapers many years ago than you will ever know.

      • Opal the Gem

        “All events are important Opal not just anti-Obama topics. Stop and listen to history and you might learn something.”

        eddie I would say the same as phideaux I knew more than you will ever know when i became potty trained and gave up diapers..

      • truesoy

        Opalthe Gem;

        Maybe Bendecido should be reminded that Reagan gave ‘amnesty to almost 3 million aliens.
        And about the issue of ‘executive orders.: Obama 128, Reagan 381.
        Is Bendecido suggesting that the Patron Saint of the conservatives violated the Constitution 381 times?

        Sincerely,
        Truesoy

    • Paul Wells

      I’m really not sure where you are getting your misguided information Dave67…perhaps you should check out a website other than dailykos or similar, but the sad fact is, King ‘O’ has compiled a record of 128 EO’s as of today. Bush signed a fair number also, but it was less than Obama. W signed 291 in 8 years in office, and Obama is on pace to beat him hands down. Please get your facts straight before you post.

      • Charlie Tall

        Political expert Dave67 is confusing executive privilege with executive order.

        Duh!

      • Karolyn

        How is Obama on track to beat Bush hands-down? If he’s signed 128 in almost four years; and Bush signed 290 in 8. At the current rate, Obama would have 258 in 8 years!

      • Brad

        You see Karolyn, Ohmama hasn’t reached his fouth year in office it’s been 41 month’s and by the numbers he will surpass Bush II if he is elected to a second term.

    • Charlie Tall

      Has it occurred to you, Dave67 – it’s obviously been missed by Obama – that illegal aliens are illegal, and thus they are ALL criminals.

      “The only stipulations are that they have no criminal record and…”

      If the Department of Justice had done the job it was created to do, they would all have records and would all be deported. As it stands now, they are merely undocumented criminals.

      The current immigration laws are fair: Follow the rules and you can become a citizen. Disobey the rules and you will be deported.

      It’s the implementation of the laws, the policies of the Executive Branch (a.k.a. The President), that are unfair. Why? Because they favor criminals.

      Illegal aliens are criminals.

      • Karolyn

        Illegal aliens are NOT criminals. Only the ones who have committed criminal acts are criminals.
        http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0503h.asp

      • eddie47d

        Conservatives just love incarcerating anyone whether illegals or Americans. They can’t get beyond that.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Karolyn, ILLEGAL aliens ARE criminals! They ARE breaking the law, which makes them criminals! I looked at your source. It is nonsense! Just because somebody says it doesn’t make it so! When a person breaks the law, they are committing a crime, hence the word, CRIMINAL!!!

      • Dave67

        Charlie Tall and the rest of the conservative morons here…

        The US Chamber of Commerce loves illegals being here… They fight for the status quo… Why?

        Money from cheap labor stupids…. This issue has always been about money…Do you know of any US citizen dying to go into the farms and pick vegetables, who’s life ambition is to manicure my lawn or maintain my trees? Or to serve your fat azzes fast food?

        The conservatives are bent on having scapegoats for their failed policies and since illegals do not have the money to give to the conservative cause, they get the scapegoating.

        Who also changed immigration rules around congress? Ronald Reagan, George Bush 1, Bill Clinton and George Bush 2.

        So take your faux outrage and shove it someplace conservotrons.

      • rockdoc01

        Karolyn, they are criminals because they are not following our immigration laws of either getting work visa/green cards or are not becoming naturalized citizens. I can’t understand why you cannot see that. You don’t have to be a murderer, thief, or drug dealer to be a criminal. If you violate a law, you are a criminal. They violate immigration law and procedures.

      • Karolyn

        Nancy – Did you read the blog? He makes some great points; and it does seem to be a Libertarian site. I think it is definately worth reading. I t’s t he kind of article that makes one thing a little instead of just being fed what somebody else wants you to think.

      • uvuvuv

        nancy thanks for the tips on kearney. that’s a more cosmopolitan town also because of the travelers stopping overnight. in 1973 richard nixon invented executive privilege and boy did that get archibald cox and richard ruckelshaus and EVERYone else ticked to the extreme. just because he’s president he can’t do that! the hippies were upset too and that just shows how serious this was. subsequent presidents were afraid to touch it, and so i haven’t heard the term used again over the last 39 years, until now. suddenly it’s conveniently revived, but now those same hippies are in tears of joy because it’s being used by their dear leader obanana. wait a minute. is he using the exec priv for the illegals, or to cover up the holder situation. well whatever. as long as obama does it, it’s okay with me. but if bush ever used it there wudda been 4 inch headlines.

      • Brad

        Karolyn you might want to read the definition of an illegal alien, http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illegal+alien

      • JUKEBOX

        Karolyn, you need to look up the definition of “ILLEGAL”, if you can comprehend English.

      • http://Rsgoeman@yahoo.com Randy G

        Karolyn*** illegals may not seem like criminals to you BUT they ARE INVADERS!!!They are not building the dream in their country, they rather steal it from us. US , whose parents and grandparents, greatgrandparents & so on built it here. Why can’t they WORK to build it in their land?

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Karolyn, I read it. It’s crap. I think for myself!

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        You’re welcome, uvuvuv. Oh, and I agree with your comment.

      • moonbeam

        uvuvuv says: “is he using the exec priv for the illegals, or to cover up the holder situation.”

        Well, considering he is an illegal himself, I would say it is the former. What better way to C.Y.A than to circumvent constitutional law concerning illegals when the circumventor is NOT a natural born citizen.

      • eddie47d

        How can anyone agree with UVUVUV when he is cherry picking? Nixon Executive Privilege- 6 Obama – 1 . Quite a difference.

    • Patriot II

      All of you liberals have to point out something bad that you think Bush did. In fact all of you need to blame others for everthing. Thats what your Muslum President does, he blames every thing on others, no wonder he is your leader.

      Well here is a taste of you own medicine. I think socialism is Bad, you obviously think it is good!. Your present dream of a Socialistist state was started by FDR, one of the biggest Socialist in this country.

      Free enterprise and Capitalism is the answer NOT Socialism!

      • eddie47d

        Capitalism has run amuck and you want us to believe it is all the falult of FDR or socialism. There is much more to the story than that tired old line.

      • nc

        Patriot II, see “bulls, bears donkeys and elephants” and tell me what is “Socialist” about those figures as compared to what the repugnuts produced over the same period.? Do you have different figures for the stock market for that same period? The results of that period was the leading economy in the world by the strongest nation in the world until the fiscal policy of george w, bush, 2001-2008, drove the Dow down to 6547!
        If you will go to a Republcan site , Forbes.com @ Presidents and Prosperity you see the charts for the ranking of the economies of the Democrat and Republican administration that SUPPORTS the findings of ‘Bulls bears donkeys elephants” REMEMBER THE MAN IN CHARGE AT FORBES WAS A CONTENDER TO WIN THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT! WOULD HE PRINT LIES AGAINST HIS OWN PARTY?
        IT’S YOU AND YOUR KIND THAT REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP IN TIMES OF WAR AND PEACE HAS PLAYED A MAJOR IF NOT LEADING ROLE IN MAKING THIS PLACE THE BEST PLACE IN THE WORLD TO LIVE!! IS AMERICA YOUR SECOND CHOICE???
        ARE YOU A PATRIOT TO YOUR COUNTRY AND THE FACTS OR JUST TO YOUR KOOLAID??
        VISIT THOSE SITES!!!THERE IS TRUTH IN OTHER PLACES!!!

      • phideaux

        “Patriot II, see “bulls, bears donkeys and elephants”…”

        That pig don’t fly any more. In fact that pig never flew it just wallowed in the mud and failed miserably when it tried to become
        silk purse.

    • Vigilant

      “So Obama issues an executive order to deal with the issue since the GOP is more interested in taking back the white house than getting anything done. Oh and King Bush the second had 6 of these types of orders to Obama’s 1. Where was the faux outrage then conservotrons?”

      Dave67, better lay off the psychotropic drugs. Your ignorance and muddled thinking are astounding, though admittedly characteristic of the left.

      (1) Learn the difference between an executive order and an exercise of executive privilege. The 6 to 1 to which you are referring were EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE assertions, not executive orders. And it refers to the Fast & Furious coverup, NOT the unconstitutional failure of Obama to enforce Fedral laws.

      (2) Obama DID NOT issue an executive order regarding the sidestepping of the Constitution on immigration law. He merely ANNOUNCED it as any dictator would. He should be taken to court for this outrageous action, clearly NOT within the dictates of his Constitutionally mandated duties.

      • JeffH

        Specifics aren’t important to liberals, progressives and especially Obamaphiles.
        Difinitive to them is just a state of mind, they’re all about apples and oranges which, to them, is the same…fruit…”caveman like fruit”. Bass ackwards is what my momma would say.

      • nc

        Vigilant, in an earlier post you said you had destroyed “the stock market loves the Democrats” saying that I posted and the truth of ‘Bulls bears donkeys and elephants” figures! When I posted Bulls Bears donkeys and elephants” I invited the conservatives who disagreed to combat those figures with figures of their own for the same period and NOT WORDS!

        AGAIN, ALL I GOT FROM YOU WERE WORDS! and AGAIN I INVITE YOU TO SHOW ME WITH FIGURES WHERE THE “SOCIALIST” DEMOCRAT ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE BEEN OUT PERFORMED BY THE REPUBLICANS IN THE STOCK MARKET SINCE 1928!

      • Vigilant

        nc (Neanderthal cranium) says, laughingly, “AGAIN, ALL I GOT FROM YOU WERE WORDS!”

        Yes, indeed, they were words of wisdom and common sense you failed to read. If you read them, your imbecilic lack of comprehension puts you in the lower quartile of the IQ bell curve.

        They were also words that show I have a much greater grasp on the field of statistics than you will ever have.

        I don’t need to provide figures, sonny. Your “statistical” chart proved absolutely nothing, for the reasons I outlined. It was pure propaganda for the gullible such as yourself.

        To gin up a chart with credibility, MANY MANY more relevant figures and influences over time would have to be factored in. Since that was not done, the “statistical” study is pure hogwash, as is your contention by implication that Democrats create a more favorable atmoshere for stock market gains. It just ain’t so, ignoramus.

    • http://www.facebook.com/barbjeanpatton Barb Patton

      Dave67 you are a fool and a blithering idiot – if I had to guess I would say you are black and you voted for the white/black half caste that is sitting in a seat of power he does not deserve, you are either on food stamps or some sort of “disability”, you have never served in the army and thus you think you can spout cr@p about a serious subject you nothing about…The ayatollah barack hussein obama is prostituting the entire country to get votes whether legally or illegally – he does not care a d-a-m-n- and you DAVE56 are also going to suffer from his dishonesty. Enough said. WAKE UP AMERICA

      • Karolyn

        And obviously, Barb, you know ALL! It must be great to be able to “see” everything about people from what they post. Hmmmm. Tell me; how old am I?

      • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

        Barb patton,”B.H.O.”, is 13% black, 34% white, and 53% araba, so that makes him 100% mixed nuts.

      • Dave67

        Racist, tin hat wearing Conservative….

        Spare me your nonsense.

      • http://none Charlie

        what’s new ? (offensive comment removed)

      • Average Joe

        Dave67,
        “Racist, tin hat wearing Conservative….”

        As opposed to “you”………..an idiot savant from the Ministry of Disinformation?
        Pssst…I’ll take that tin hat any day of the week.

        Do you ever get tired of patting yourself on the back? (Yes, I know, someone has to do it)

        Dude…you are really TOO full of yourself…a legend in your own mind ( but, nowhere else)….Whadda Maroon!

        Best wishes,
        AJ

    • Brad

      Dave I understand not only the Republicans voted down the jobs bill and Dream Act, but your fellow Democrats also voted these bills down. You are blaming it all on the GOP when your are wrong to do so. Get your facts right Liberal Idioto!!!

      • Flashy

        Brad…the Dream Act vote was 55-41 with all GOP against. The Jobs bill was 57-43, with all GOP voting against. The filibuster blocking these two bills was not overcome.

        Note…both pro- American worker bills had unanimous GOP nay votes.

      • Brad

        AND SOME DEMOCRATIC NAY VOTES FlashMan!!!

      • phideaux

        “Brad…the Dream Act vote was 55-41 with all GOP against.”

        Another lie from Flashy pants. Three Republicans voted FOR the bill. I am sure if you checked the jobs bill you would find another lie from ol flashy pants.

      • Flashy

        Phid…I may be in error. I grabbed the Roll Call for my information. I know the Dream Act and the Jobs bill received over 50% of the votes..but fell short of overcoming the GOP filibuster.

        Out of curiousity..who were the three GOPers?

      • phideaux

        To quote you flashy pants look it up for yourself. As a point of interest there were also I think 5 democrats who opposed the bill.

      • Jeff

        The Dream Act passed the House in 2010 and got 55 votes in the Senate, 51 from Democrats and 4 from Republicans (a miracle in itself). In a rational world, it would be law now. But we have the McConnell Rule in effect. If the Republicans do run the table this year, it will be interesting to see if they attempt to change the fillibuster rule at the beginning of the session. If they do, it should leave no doubt in anyone’s mind that the Republicans have never been interested in alternate viewpoints. It’s all about winning and money.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      Dave67, the GOP are not being obstructionists. They are standing up for what they believe in. They wouldn’t be representing the people who sent them there if they didn’t. Fans of obummer seem to think that if the GOP doesn’t go along with what they want, they’re just being mean and spiteful. It isn’t that. Many people in this country are against the dream act. We deserve to be represented too. It’s how the system works. It was never intended that our government could just pass laws whenever they wanted. Our system of checks and balances was designed to make it difficult to pass laws. The laws had to be right for everyone. This whole business or executive order is being abused by presidents in BOTH parties and should be abolished. The business of passing laws is supposed to be difficult and we would ALL be better off with fewer laws!

      • Jeff

        Every House and Senate member is sent there to represent a constituency, but the Republicans have abused the fillibuster beyond anything ever seen. Plus, the Republicans refuse to sign on to anything, even their own ideas, that might boost the economy. They would rather tank the economy than give Obama a victory. I don’t think that’s been true in the past.

    • http://twitter.com/PTiekamp Patrick Tiekamp

      The ignorant leading the wise. The libs need to read our Constitution and if they don’t agree they should move to a Country more suited to them.

      • Flashy

        Read it many many times Patrick….what part do you need help with?

      • Jeff

        In what section of the Constitution is the “Love It of Leave It” clause?

    • Aubrey Mason

      Dave67,
      You are truly an idiot. You should listen to yourself – better yet, go read some history.
      None of us here agree or accept the injustices and bending/breaking of the law by GOP persons in office – we want our lives and Nation back the way they were supposed to be! The Constitution very clearly shows us the way, the problems are that men who have been elected to power often do not handle that power well – or in the best interests of those they were elected to serve.
      They need to remember they were elected to SERVE – not dictate.

      What we so strongly object to is the part about someone who was elected to serve, instead, dictating what is going to happen to all of us – in contravention of law and our Constitution.
      I personally do not care what party they belong to! I started out my life as a voting democrat, and then changed it to republican – but I identify as an Independent….
      Because every voting year I find myself faced with very bad options for presidents, congresspersons and senators! Bad choices!

      We the people want our Nation to run the way it was supposed to run; minimal government intrusion in our lives, minimal or no taxing (remember, taxation by the British was what began our Nation and freedom) and the rule of law.
      What we actually have is government ignoring the parts of the Constitution that require full disclosure of all government documents to any citizen, full disclosure of all financial documents to any Citizen, government telling us what we can do, when we can do it and for how long.
      Welcome to 1984.

      This began decades ago – sold to the public as requirements for National Security. We don’t even know if Ft. Knox still has gold! We as a Nation have never seen the riches we are supposed to have locked away.

      Under this administration we have seen China buy up US debt – and they are quite adversarial to our form of government! I’ve lived in the Orient!
      We have seen the public demand action, demand justice – and we have seen the administration ignore the public will and flout it’s power by desecration of the United States of America’s flag, ignoring Congress and using executive powers to enact laws the majority of US Citizens DO NOT WANT while continuing to enforce laws the vast majority of US Citizens DO NOT WANT.
      We have seen government agents literally murder people and never be charged with murder!

      In other words; this administration is doing whatever it wants, flaunts the Constitution at every step, flaunts the Laws of this Nation whenever it wants and never listens to the people of this Nation unless they have millions of dollars they want to “donate” to the administration!
      Dave67, why don’t you go out and buy a copy of obama’s book “Dreams of my father” there are links out there to buy it for $4.95. Read it and then explain to the rest of us how you managed to overlook the part where, in his book, obama clearly states he is racist and a Muslim.

      Get your facts straight dave67.
      I am a person of color and I can talk. I’m saying barack hussain obama is probably the worst choice I have ever seen as a president and there are far too many people like you who do not educate themselves with facts – and are going to vote for this poser.

      And if you DO vote for him and he is somehow elected….. remember what I’ve told you here when they come breaking down your door or take your daughter or wife for their own uses……….. remember this. By then it might be a little late though………..

      • nc

        AUBREY, have you ever visited a law library to see just how many volumes there are in the REPORTS of the decisions of the US Supreme Court? Hundreds and hundreds of cases the Court had to decide because GOOD AMERICAN citizens could not agree on WHAT the words of the Constitution MEANS! EVEN CASES OF CONSERVATIVES AGAINST CONSERVATIVES WHO COULD NOT AGREE WHAT IT MEANT!!
        IT IS NOT JUST YOUR CONSTITUTION FOR YOU AND THOSE WHO BELIEVE LIKE YOU TO SAY WHAT IT MEANS! HAVING AN OPINION IS A RIGHT BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE THE OPINION ‘RIGHT”
        YOU REALLY NEED TO GO SEE WHAT THE SUPREME COURT HAS SAID ABOUT “OUR” CONSTITUTION!!!!!!

      • Average Joe

        nc,
        Whining isn’t pretty. Yelling isn’t nice….and…. you’re still an idiot…
        Any questions? Keep them to yourself… I won’t respond to your stupidity.

        Usually I am cordial when I post….however, there are some folks( you know who you are) who don’t warrant civility…they are just…. too stupid and self righteous to be dealt with in a civil manner…for them…no response …or….no mercy! Sometimes I just have to call a spade…a spade….

        Best wishes,
        AJ

      • Robert Rashbrooke

        Aubrey,

        We are NOT a democracy, in which people ARE ELECTED TO REPRESENT THE CONSTITUENCY and are RESPONSIBLE to the electorate.

        We are a REPESENTATIVE REPUBLIC, whereIN we elect someone WHOSE VIEWS ARE CLOSEST TO OUR OWN and tell him/her to go off to Congress and act as THEY THINK FIT, but not necessarily in each of our INDIVIDUAL best interests.

        May be this is what is stymying our political system?

  • http://httpaol.com sean murry

    That POSis a poor excuse for a human being.

  • MAP

    The worthless scoundrel in the White House is the most fanatic, far-left, radical in the country’s history. He has consistently operated outside constitutional law. He has stopped at nothing to ram through his extreme, far-left agenda, even in the face of massive, majority opposition. The underhanded way he forced through his socialistic healthcare disaster, his stand on illegals and the queer agenda, shows the work of a dictator, not an elected official. His entire presidency has been a disaster on all fronts, the reality of which is covered over with doctored-up and fabricated ‘facts’ and by – what the goons, zombies, and fanatic zealots that make up the DNC do best – outright lies. As much as I dislike Romney, and the way the GOP forced him upon us as a choice, this radical piece of scum must go. We, as a people, must reject his entire poisonous ideology. We must show the extremist, delusional, fanatics on the left that their mental illness has no place in the world of reality. If Obama is the face of the Democratic Party, then that party has no place in America.

    Now let the absurd lies from the leftist mental patients that infect this site begin.

    • Warrior

      Yes but, who is suppose to stand up for the “dead and illegals”, if not the demorats? It really is a tragedy so many future democrats are ‘killed” by abortion. Oh well, you made that bed, you sleep in it.

      • susanm

        YOU TELL ME: how do they get the dead people to the polls!

      • trw

        its not for us to stand up for the dead or illegals we should stand up for americans and the constitution and demand the laws of this country is enforced on all people including congress for there is no where in the constitution that allows congress to exempt themselves from any laws but its because we have too many people with the same mental attitude you have i bet you think the goverment owes you a living most liberals and democrats think that way

      • teaparty13

        there’s a hearse nearby on call

    • Ruth

      I like the comments that MAP made in response to the people acting as our president of our once great united states of america.We must make the voting people see the need to remove him this november.Wake up people and see what is happening to our nation before it is to late.

      • http://yahoo.com John The Baptist

        What do you do when you get a splinter in your finger ? You take it out.

    • Brad

      I agree 100% MAP. If he will stoop this low to get the hispanic vote, what will he do when we actually get closer to election day and has 40% of the vote if any? Will he call martial law and stop the elections all together causing a Civil War and bring blood to the streets of the USA?? People are pissed. Potential customers we talk to all over the USA everyday in my office are bitter and pissed off, you can feel and hear it over the phone. People wanting to purchase a specialty car, that had perfect credit their whole adult lives, can’t purchase an old car. Everyday it gets worse, yet you can refinancing a home (with equity if there are any out there) without a social security number or buy a brand new Corvette through Government Motors (GM), but with damged credit won’t qualify for our loans. Every other applicant we get from the state of California have perfect credit except for on small thing, they have a short sale from a previous mortgage or had let their current mortgage get many months behind so the current lender would remodify their home loan, They get really angry when you tell them this kills any chance of approval for an antique car loan, yet their lender told them this would not effect their credit before they decided to let their motgage get behind, in order to lower their rate and monthly payment. By law the lender should have told them these consequinces and then they would have allowed in their equation of options for a refinance with another lender, not to damage their credit rating.But it looks better on the banker’s ledger to keep the loan on their books rather than tell the home owner the truth. God Bless America. Lock and Load!!

    • mark

      OK, so you’re a hateful, non-intelligent racist. But how about giving us something new, some insight? Anything?

      • Scott Hill

        I didn’t read all the comments before I had to chime in; what a bunch of FOX “news” listening, racist, misinformed, lying scumbags most of these people are. Wow. The sheer number of out-and-out lies, the incredible volume of the shrieks of pure, mindless hatred… …it’s almost unbelievable.

        The facts are that our president has *not* broken the law here. If he had, the Republicans would have jumped on that. If any one of you had the slightest comprehension of “Obamacare”, then you’d realize how much each and every one of you will directly benefit from lowering healthcare costs and stopping insurance companies from ripping us all off. And to go back to the original issue, any fool can see that this charade of removing people from the lists of registered voters as a vile sham, attempting to steal the presidency through shenanigans and tampering with the voting process. Hardly any of these people that aren’t getting deported are going to vote, and certainly not enough to make a difference, so calm down and shut the hell up.

      • Brad

        Scott, What are the three branches of government? What part of the US government actually makes the laws? What branch of government ensures said laws are constitutional? Finally who signs all laws? Yes Ohmama broke the law, by the storke of his own pen signing his executive order granting 800K plus illegals to stay in this country under certin conditions. As for Ohmamacare, did you know that by the time HCR is fully incorporated we as citizens will be paying in excess of 500 Billion dollars more a year in taxes, and you claim HCR will bring down medical expenses, in your dreams. Health care cost have jumped on average 12 to 15% due to HCR. Please open your eye’s, come out of the rain, you are being sold a bill of goods that’s turning our great nation into a welfare state, and you have bought into it…

      • JUKEBOX

        Scott, if you think that insurance rates are going to be lower, think again. After Obamacare passed, my BC/BS Advantage premium increased 450%. I am afraid that too many people today have terminal cases of rectal/cranial inversion when it comes to all of Obama’s well read teleprompter coments. When he starts stuttering, you know he is going to tell big lie.

    • JeffH

      This one’s for mark and Scott. Only ignorant liberal panderer racists play the race card and you two have done just that. Racists you both be…wasn’t anything racist in MAP’s post.

  • Vigilant

    Senators and Representatives need to do more than just read the Constitution. Their oath of office should come with some legal teeth, whereas they would be subject to loss of office if they fail to indicate fidelity to that oath.

    • R Classen

      They have legal ‘teeth’. It’s the power of the purse. All congress has to do to bring this out of control cluster-f**k back to reality is cut the funding to all these Czars and their agencies. Obama would quickly come around to being reasonable if all of his henchmen suddenly found themselves without a budget. HE, himself could be brought up on articles of impeachment and out of there within weeks IF the congress and senate would listen to the people. There is a remedy here……….just nobody chooses to do anything about it. It’s shameful. They should ALL be kicked out.

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

        “In a nation of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches the whole people by its’ examples. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.”
        1928 Supreme Court opinion by Justice Louis Brandeis

      • danny

        R Classen ,You are exactly right and every attoney I have spoken with are in complete agreement, that our problem or failure of tyhe system lies on Boener,and Harry Reid. As well as every representative that fails to petition for “IMPEACHMENT” every day.

      • mizclay

        The article must have been based on the Fox Opinion video which left off the last part of the speech “but, I can do this”. He did NOT break any law.

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

        Some of this is just way over my poor little humble head, can someone please explain to me how it’s legal to fund these czars in the first place?!!

      • Jeff

        I have a great idea for you. Why don’t you, Bob, Sheriff Joe and whoever else you can get to join your posse go to Washington and make a citizens’ arrest? Would you only arrest Obama or would you go after W for the Iraq War? Or is that not important enough? By the way, are you sure you can impeach a president w/o a blowjob being involved?

      • pweiters9

        7/3/12, Lawlessness runs from Fed down to state & local. AG. Holder’s justice dept won’t prosecute & BO invokes exec privilege simply because they can flout the law w/impunity. You get Mayor Bloomberg landing his chopper off-hours at South St. Heliport; and those whose job it is to enforce that ordinance have no interest in stopping him. So much for “the law’s the law’s the law.”

      • Jeff

        King? The only recent President we’ve had who got the job solely because of who his daddy was and who had the inbreeding and idiocy of a true monarch was your favorite, W.

      • Rodhea

        Ohhhhh Jeff…if inbreeding results in idiots…what’s your excuse for your moronic comments here. But then, a moron would not realize he is a moron because he is 2 levels below idiot on the IQ scale…Idiot 50-69, Imbecile 26-49, Moron 25 or less. Of course, your IQ does not measure social or emotional intelligence. Otherwise, I would have to rate you even lower for your commentary that throws tantrums after you visit sites where the majority of people are not going to agree with you…and you just can’t resist spouting some jibberish at them because it makes you mad. If you can’t take the heat Jeff, step into the cooler…visit a site that agrees with you so you can raise your level above something that is intellectually deficient. ;)

      • Jeff

        Because your attack is completely ad hominem, I have no idea what posting of mine so offended your sensibilities. Maybe you should have right wing censors police these sites so your sensitive eyes never have to encounter an opinion contrary to what’s spoonfed you by Sean and Rush.

      • Jeff

        Now I see the posting that got you so riled. I’m sorry if I referred to your imbecile as an idiot. Let me put it this way. If W were the standard by which we assess presidencies, Nixon would be on Mt. Rushmore. It may take us a generation to emerge from the hole he dug for us. I suppose but for the 22nd amendment, you’d have voted for him a 3rd time. Actually, but for the 22nd amendment (No, that doesn’t mean 11 guns), W never could have been selcted by the Scalito Twins et. al. because Clinton would have been re-re-elected in a landslide.

    • factnotrhetoric

      Infowars.com is running a $15,000 give away prize for the best legal, display of public posters showing “DICTATOR OBAMA”.

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

        Let me be clear; COOL!

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.
      • JUKEBOX

        All you would have to do is put a little mustache on him and a NAZI cap.

      • http://Rsgoeman@yahoo.com Randy G

        Just show him walking to an outhouse with the Constitution in hand. He thinks no more of it but as toilet paper anyway.

      • http://www.facebook.com/david.a.deal David A Deal

        It would have to contain lies and distortions and would pander only to the small minded on the right who want to believe what they want to believe despite facts to the contrary. Obama waited longer than any other recent President to use Executive privilege, He has issued fewer Executive orders than any President since Chester B Arthur, his policy change on the deportation of illegal youth is not ignoring or changing of the law but a more compassionate implimentation and use of resources going after criminal elements instead of children and their families who are not threats to society but actually productive tax payers and children who know only the USA as their country. The extemist, exaggerated, distorted, bigoted attacks on the President are childish, sick, and unpatriotic as well as simply unfair.

      • vgentry@marcduttonirr.com

        David – We employ a few illegals. Let me inform you as to how they pay “taxes”. They all claim M-6 to M-8 dependents. Hardly ANY federal tax is withheld from their pay. They don’t file returns and the government doesn’t care. You wanna know why? They pay 5.65% of their gross to Medicare and SS. We, the employer pays 7.65% for a total of 13.30% of their gross. The government gets to keep all that money. The IRS used to send me notices if a W2 name and SS # didn’t match. They don’t do that anymore because they don’t have to pay it out to someone who doesn’t ever file for Medicare/SS. So. I don’t personally have a problem with the illegals living & working here. What I do have a problem with is they don’t pay their fair share of taxes and lie on the W4 about marital status and dependents. There is a solution however. The Fair Tax. We would all get to keep ALL of our paycheck and pay a consumption tax. That would force everyone to pay taxes. And unless you are a legal citizen, you wouldn’t get the prebate. That would encourage illegals to become legals. Also, corporations would pay no tax which would bring millions of jobs back to the USA !!! Please contact your representatives and tell them you want the FAIR TAX implemented immediately. Problem solved.

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

        David A. Deal, Cali beckons you dude! They need more bleedin’ heart libtards like yourself!!! You do have a job don’t cha or are you just another sponge in favor of someone else to pay yo freeloadin’ ways?! Don’t get so down!!! When the checks get cut off there’ll always be beans to pick! LOL!!!

      • Jeff

        Just in case no one else has told you lately, you are insane.

      • turfdome

        This is actually a reply to vgentry. It is not true that corporations would pay no tax, they would pay the consumption tax on all new items that they buy. Since corporations almost exclusively buy new, this means that the tax burden of corporations (& other business forms) would be vastly more evenly (fairly?) spread across private sector spectrum. They would save a ton on tax compliance hoop jumping though. Might be able to hand out raises. Now if we can just address all those M & As and huge executive compensation packages….I know! if corps are ‘persons’ we should be able to disallow them buying other corporate ‘persons’, yes?

    • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

      Some BIG SHARP legal teeth Vig!!! Charlie Rangel deserves to be punished to the FULLEST extent of our laws seein’s that he was the one who was responsible for writing the tax code!!! CENSORED!!! You gotta be kiddin’ me! That’s congressional time-out! OMG, LOL!!! Nancy looked more pained meting out the punishment than Charlie looked recieving it! It sure didn’t take him too long to regain that ear to ear Rangel smile now did it?!! I’d be SMILIN’ too! I wonder what Redd Foxx would have to say?! You don’t suppose Redd would use the “N” word do ya Vig?! LOL!!!

    • PELICAN1001

      TO ALL CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS

      WHEN YOU TOOK THE OATH OF OFFICE YOU SWORE THAT YOU WOULD UP HOLD THE CONSTITUTION AND DEFEND THE UNITED STATES. YOU HAVE NOT DONE YOU JOB

      I AM BEGINING TO THINK THAT NONE OF YOU HAVE A BACKBONE OR A SPINE.
      MOST OF YOU ARE SPINELESS FOLLOWERS WHO CANT THINK FOR THEMSELVES.

      WHY ARE YOU SELLING US DOWN THE RIVER. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT MOST OF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE ANOTHER NAZI GERMANY HERE IN THE US. WE WERE SUCH A GREAT COUNTRY UNTIL YOU PEOPLE TOOK STUPID PILLS AND ARE CARRYING US BACK IN TIME TO PRE WORLD WAR 2.

      WHY ARE ALL OF YOU ALLOWING OBAMA TO:

      ALL OF YOU CONGRESS MEN ALLOW OBAMA TO ILLEGALLY SIT IN OFFICE EVEN THOUGH HE IS NOT NOW OR NEVER WAS A US CITIZEN
      WHY DO YOU ALLOW OBAMA TO ABUSE THE EXECUTIVE ORDER (WHICH SHOULD ONLY BE USED FOR DIRE EMERGENCIES) NOT TO GET YOUR OWH WAY AND TURN THIS COUNTRY INTO A DICTATORSHIP AND ALL OF YOU CONGRESSMEN JUST SIT BACK AND ALLOW HIM TO DO WHATEVER HE PLEASES
      WHY ARENT YOU CONGRESSMEN FIGHTING MORE TO GET RID OF THE ABUSE OF ALL THESE ILLEGALS WHO ARE DRIVING THIS COUNTRY INTO FINANCIAL RUIN WITH THEIR DRAIN ON THE SYSTEM…..NO YOU JUST SIT BACK AND LET IT HAPPEN
      LETS GET RID OF THE DREAM ACT…..ANOTHER ITEM TO WHICH YOU JUST SIT BACK AND DO NOTHING
      WHY ARE YOU JUST STANDING BY AND ALLOWING VOTER FRAUD; DEAD PEOPLE VOTING; ILLEGALS VOTING; DOGS VOTING…..ONCE AGAIN YOU JUST SIT BACK AND DO NOTHING AND LET IT HAPPEN
      WHY…… WHEN 75% OF THE US CITIZENS DO NOT WANT OBAMACARE…..YOU JUST SIT BACK AND LET IT HAPPEN
      WHY ARENT YOU DOING ANY INVESTIGATION INTO THE WHITE HOUSE LEAKS……WHY IS THIS COUNTGRYS SAFETY PUT AT RISJ….AND YOU JUST SIT BACK AND DO NOTHING
      WHY ARENT YOU MAKING A GREATER EFFORT TO FORCE OBAMA TO GET SPENDING UNDER CONTROL…..NO YOU JUST SIT BACK AND LE OBAMA JUST PRINT UP SOME MORE MONEY….AND YOU AGAIN SIT BACK AND DO NOTHING
      WHY ARENT YOU FIGHTING THE UN AGENDA 21…..WHY ARE YOU SO WILLING TO LETS THE NUTS OF THE UN TAKE OVER THIS COUNTRY….YOU JUST SIT BACK AND DO NOTHING
      JUST IN CASE YOU DON’T KNOW IT…..WE HAVE THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM TO ASSEMBLE……WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO CURTAIL THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TEA PARTIES…..YET YOU ALLOWED THE OCCUPY WALLSTREETERS TO DEMONSTRAT E TO THE POING THAT PERSONAL SAFETY AND PROPERTY WAS AT RISK…..INTERFER WITH PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO GO TO WORK; SHOP; DRIVE OVER A BRIDGE; STOP TRAFFIC…..AND ONCE AGAIN YOU SAT BACK AND DID NOTHING

      LETS WAKE UP AND GET THIS COUNTRY BACK TO WHERE IT WAS BEFORE YOU ALLOWED IT TO BE DESTROYED
      WHEN YOU TOOK THE OATH OF OFFICE YOU SWORE THAT YOU WOULD UP HOLD THE CONSTITUTION AND DEFEND THE UNITED STATES. YOU HAVE NOT DONE YOU JOB

      IF YOU CANT DO YOUR JOBS YOU SHOULD GET OUT OF OFFICE AND LET SOMEONE WHO WILL FO THE JOB STEP UP TO THE PLATE.
      THE REPUBLICANS HAVE HAD THE EDGE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS AND YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED DIDDLY SQUAT YOU SHOULD ALL BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES. YOU HAVE NOT ACCOMPLISHED NOT OHNE THING OF IMPORTANTCE OR THAT WOULD MAKE A DEFFERENCE.

      IT APPEARS THAT ALL YOU ARE THERE FOR IS YOUR OWN EGOS. AND THAT IS NOT WHY YOU WERE SENT TO WASHINGTON.
      YOU WERE SENT THERE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
      IT IS TIME FOR ALL OF YOU TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

      • http://yahoo.com Robert C. Whittaker

        I thought for a moment I had writen those words but have kind of given up as the people who can make a difference are the people we keep electing but get nothing for our vote or the money we pay them. It is beginning to leave us with little alternatives.

      • Ray

        they have sold out for the money and power like always

      • moonbeam

        I tried to write something similar yesterday, but it was not very nice and decided against posting it. However, you have captured my exact sentiments in a more civil manner that I was incapable of at the time.

        It absolutely astounds me how an illegal can usurp his way to the white house, break numerous laws, dismantle our Constitution and nothing is done about it? Just going to let him do what he arrogantly wants and get away with it?

        I just…don’t…get it.

        This is America. Stand up and fight for her at the voting booth in November. Throw out the trash and get our Constitutional Republic back on solid footing to flourish for ever more!

      • ICEDRAGONNITE

        START THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Even if he is not reelected, he needs to face charges of Treason and Sedition. If he is found guilty then I suggest public hanging.
        This man has deliberately tried to destroy this nation from within and is bankrupting it as we speak, also the only friends he has now are the Muslim Brotherhood. So time to say bye, bye .

      • belinda

        i really would like to start impeachment process . probably just me would not make a difference. anyone know how to do this

      • old hillbilly

        Amen to that! Repeat it wherever we go! Hold feet to the fire!

      • Jeff

        Are you aware that once you invoke the name of Hitler and the Nazis, you have lost the argument?

      • http://gravatar.com/dawgbisquit1 Tom W.

        The elites of this world ALL share a couple of VERY unavoidable obstacles standing in their way of this utopian vision of theirs, FIRST and formost is their lack of the intestinal fortitude that a revolution of that scope requires! LOL!!! The other is WHO’S going to take out the rubbish?!! SURELY not none of them! Heaven forbid!!! Yeah, Heaven forbids all right!

      • Eric Jones

        Whats the problem with the u.n trying to protect ths world WE ALL SHARE. and by-the-by the media coverd just about EVERY tea-party ralley that happend but IGNORED “occupy” for 6 weeks before FINALLY mentioning them and even then instead of pointing out the reasons for the movement they simpley mocked it (where as they coudnt stop complementing the tea-party) and at least occupy is its OWN thing where as the tea-party is nothing more or less then a TOOL for the republican party.

      • JeffH

        Eric Jones must live in a cacoon and must get his mis-information from mother mothra…FYI, you’re speaking out of ignorance.

      • Eric Jones

        JeffH i dont know how his ranting and raving puts me in a caccoon but ide LOVE for you to explain it to me

      • JeffH

        Eric, I’ll make it very simple for you…it was your rant, triggered by the propagandists that have programmed your thought process to actually believe the lies, mis-information and fabrications that you just spewed.

        Even a caveman would have known that.

      • Eric Jones

        JeffH first of all thanks for the response but perhaps the queston wasnt clear i was asking what mis-information you were talking about because everything i said i can prove.

      • JeffH

        Eric, then prove it. I know you can’t but humor me.

        All you did was repeat the liberal MSM talking points…as for your take on the commie controlled OWS being ignored by the media, they weren’t…in the end, they got the press they deserved.

        Eric, you’re totally clueless about the Tea Party too!

      • Eric Jones

        Clueless about the tea-party you say well lets test that theroy shall we? the tea-party was started sometime in 2009 in responce to the econamic meltdown the previous year. it started as a way for ordinary person to vent ther frustration. like all simaler groups they claimed to represent the vast majority of america but they quickley took a conservitive/libertarian stance alienating any left leaning people who may have wanted to join. at first they correctly put the blame on the bankers who were so careless with OUR money and the goverment for bailing them out with money that could and should have been used on infastructure,healthcare etc (oh by-the-by bailouts are a aspect of contadictery nature of nature of capitilism but i diegras). they made so much noise that the elites got nervese and turned to a favorite trick of therse mis-direction they convinced the tea-partyers that the same goverment that didnt EVEN ASK the big banks how they were going to use the bailout money was somehow OVERregulating them and was therefore to blame. it is of course but ANY goverment that allows corperations to be counted as people i dont think can rationally be aqused of OVERregulation in fact in my humble opinion the problem was the anarcic lack of planning of the current system but hey thats my opinion youre free to disagree. so in closing thats what i know and feel about the tea-party a noble beginning only to be sold-out in exchange for cash and air-time. be honest now howd i do?

      • JeffH

        Eric Jones, you failed…miserably I might add.

        I’ll educate you just a bit.

        The Tea Party movement is an American political movement that supports the United States Constitution, adherence to an originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution, reduced government spending, reducing taxes, and reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit. The movement is generally considered to be conservative, libertarian, and populist. The movement has sponsored protests and supported political candidates since 2009.

        The Tea Party movement is composed of a loose affiliation of national and local groups that determine their own platforms and agendas without central leadership. The Tea Party movement has been cited as an example of grassroots political activity.

        A Gallup poll conducted in March 2010 found that—other than gender, income and politics—self-described Tea Party members were demographically similar to the population as a whole.

        An October 2010 Washington Post canvass of 647 local Tea Party organizers asked “which national figure best represents your groups?” and got the following responses: no one 34%, Sarah Palin 14%, Glenn Beck 7%, Jim DeMint 6%, Ron Paul 6%, Michele Bachmann 4%.

      • Eric Jones

        Sound like a bunch utopian demagauges to me. and if you cant see that theyve been hijacked by the coke brothers and co youre either oblivious niave or blind. the ONLY thing the tea-party has succed in is moving the republicans from the center-right to the far-right .

      • JeffH

        Eric, you’re speaking out of pure ignorance and nothing more.
        You’re an ignorant liberal repeating all of the liberal rhetoric you’ve been spoon fed at the liberal trough.

        Tyranny
        A Poem by James Paulin

        Double Etheree

        ego

        credo

        agenda

        propaganda

        minds manipulate

        boast Utopian state

        demagogue to venerate

        antagonist denigrate

        feed prejudicial hate

        misappropriate

        opposition

        defection

        upend

        end

      • Eric Jones

        Maybe its my “librel ignorence” but WHAT THE HELL DID YOU JUST SAY.

      • Jeff

        Are all liberals ignorant or just the ones who waste their time communicating with you?

      • RichE

        Jeff,
        What would a communicating conservative be?

      • JeffH

        Thanks for communicating and answering your own question…troll!

    • http://yahoo Dave

      Can you say ” Patriot Act” ? Ex-President G.W.Bush drove the constitution in the ground. What short memory’s you Republican’s have. Not all of us uneducated Americans are as stupid as you want us to be!!!!!!

      • danny

        Dave are you defending Obama’s Congressional, treason by stating what Bush did in the past. Let us be Americans , not Democrats or Republicans. If we don’t stop allowing these thugs to devide us we will never be able to control them. This is how both parties has succeded in betraying their Oath of Office. “”"”"”"”"” Americans “”"”"”"”"” UNITE, and defend our Constitution, Against all enemies Foreign and Domestic. Break these Party shacles and UNITE.

      • Flashy

        Danny…just what acts has Pres. Obama done that would be treasonous? bet you can’t specify any …

      • ET

        Dumb – Dumber – Obummer – and than there is Dave

      • ET

        I forgot to mention Flashy.
        Flashy, how many examples of/for treason regarding your “Fuehrer Obummer” do you need?!?….i.e. giving out secret service information how they operate – doing investigation and therefore the enemy knows how secret service work!!!!….you need more examples?!?…the one I mentioned is definitely more than enough to charge your “Fuehrer” with treason!!!!

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        You are right about bush and the patriot act, but what does that have to do with anything that was being discussed? When someone makes a valid point, you have to hurry up and change the subject?!?

      • Globestar

        OOPS! Did we all forget about the War Powers Resolution of 1973, signed by Congress into a Federal Law on November 7, 1973? Is this not the law that was totally ignored by ex-president George Bush following September 11, 2001? Although we can all agree that retaliation was necessary, it should have been carried out according to Congressional Law. Mr. Bush decided not to bother anyone else in our political system, he simply sent troops and declared war totally on his own. This caused an uproar in our Federal Legislature for many months. So why was Mr. Bush never impeached for this “impeachable” act? Seems to me President Obama is trying to fix the things that were broken by others, using what ever means he can. If he isn’t allowed to do it the right way, he feels forced to use other means…

    • JeffH

      Vigilant, absolutely! I am constantly sending email’s, about various issues to my reps as well as to Boehner, Issa, Grassley…and even the White House. When neccessary, I’ll put them on notice and demand that hey follow the Constitution but also understand why the framers wrote it the way hey did and what their intentions were.

      Boxer sends back generic emails. Feinstein rarely aggrees with me on anything but she does respond to the issue and will use common doublspeak to ignore the specifics. Devin Nunes always responds with a letter. All the DNC and White House has done is completely ignore me and put my email out for Obama fundraising.

      I am hoping that I will get a response from Rubio, Romney and Boehner regarding clarifying Rubio’s citizenship status as required by the Constitution for VP and POTUS.
      Feinstein did a complete doublespeak when I questioned the Constitutionality of Obama’s citizenship…not being a natural born citizen. Had to send her the actual Constitutional requirements, as the framers had intended, and the Supreme Court cases that noted and defined natural born citizen.

      • Kate8

        JeffH – I just found this, and it’s one of those HOLY S*%T moments.

        http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/private-attorney-general-discloses-doj-and-dhs-corruption-to-sheriff-joe-arpaio-marico/16628/

        This, on top of everything else… if the current Felon-in-Chief isn’t about to go… well, then we’re really scr*wed.

        In a sane world, this would spell… THE END… of a would-be dictator. I’m wondering if this was some of what Breitbart was holding.

      • Kate8

        JeffH – Just when you think it can’t possibly get more outrageous, there’s this:

        http://truthernews.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/the-nuclear-assassination-of-america-exposed/

        It’s amazing all that’s coming out. If this is the kind of stuff that Brietbart had, no wonder he was “heart attacked”.

        Hey, maybe there is something to this talk of mass arrests after all. They said that there would be an avalanche of revelation soon.

      • JeffH

        Kate8, :) Thanks for both…they’ve been saved to my favorits list.

        Judge Roll: What the Media Won’t Tell You About Jared Loughner
        (The DEATH CULT of Santa Muerte)
        By A. True Ott, PhD
        http://info.themicroeffect.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Death-Cult.pdf

      • JeffH

        Kate8, I’ve saved them to my favorites list…Thanks.

        Judge Roll: What the Media Won’t Tell You About Jared Loughner
        (The DEATH CULT of Santa Muerte)
        By A. True Ott, PhD

        http://info.themicroeffect.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Death-Cult.pdf

      • JeffH

        Kate8, I’ve been having a problem posting some of my responses that have a single website link that has a corresponding relationship with your posts…hmmm?

        Giffords Shooting All About Judge John McCarthy Roll?
        http://info.themicroeffect.com/2011/01/12/giffords-shooting-all-about-judge-john-mccarthy/
        Then click here for the PDF report from True Ott On Loughner’s Connection To Death Cults

      • JeffH

        Kate8, for some reason I can’t get my comments to post. They’ve contained single weblinks related to yours. I had one response that didn’t post to flashy farther down with a link that counters flashy’s lie about “undocumented/illegal” immigrants and the law.

        hmmmmmmmmmmmmm????

      • JeffH

        Odd to say the least and takes me back to your post regarding the scrambling of the Mancow/Ventura interview destined for c2c.

        There’s more than one way to skin a cat though.

        The website is “microeffect.com”…look up or type in your search engine:
        Giffords Shooting All About Judge John McCarthy Roll?

      • JeffH

        …then find the “Click here for the PDF report from True Ott On Loughner’s Connection To Death Cults” at the top of the article and check it out…all about Judge Roll…

      • JeffH

        ??? Now they show up? Probably a PLD server glitch…not a one was marked for “moderation”.

      • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

        Dear JeffH,

        For some reason they were caught by the spam filter.

        Best wishes,
        Bob

      • Kate8

        Thanks, JeffH.

        Remember how I was ridiculed for saying that Lochner was part of a group which was used in mind control projects… Namely, MKultra. The lone shooters have pretty much all been from this group. I happen to personally know someone who was used in these experiments. Also, I was maligned for saying that Roll was targeted because of his opposition to Obama’s agenda, and refused to capitulate to him. Gabby Giffords was with him in collaborating for re-establishing the Constitution in Congress. Does that hint at, perhaps, another reason why Congress is not standing up to Obama?

        The last few days there have been, finally, some reports which have come out, revealing programs like MKultra. Congress knew about it because there were Congressional hearings… some of them were posted on the articles. It was a secret military experiment that involved the abducting, torturing and brainwashing/programming of thousands, tens of thousands, of young people over the course of several years. And it was only ONE of many horrific things done by the military involving children and young people. Kind of explains the unexplainable disappearances of millions of children and young people every year.

        Anyway, they have all been programmed to be triggered in order to commit mayhem such as Lochner and Columbine, etc…, and there are many more waiting. Some have been discovered and are going through deprogramming, but it is a difficult process. They hear voices (due to chips in their heads) and many of them, if not most, are on psych meds…being treated for mental illness.

        I know that it sounds like science fiction, but I have been researching this for many years, for reasons which I don’t care to divulge. The even worse part is that these young people have nowhere to turn for help, because no one will believe them. I didn’t believe for a long time, either. I had the syncronous opportunity to speak at length with a doctor who specialized in these cases.

        At any rate, as shocking as some of these things are, they are just the tip of the iceberg. It gets much worse. At least, now that they are being exposed, perhaps we can put an end to all of this insanity.

        BTW, if you want links to articles about these things, I can provide them.

        Remember, the meaning of Apocalypse is “revelation”. This means that we are in a time when all that has been hidden is being exposed, so that we can decide which direction we want to go as humankind. Hopefully, this is shocking us into the desire to root out every facet of evil among us, and live as we were always intended.

        Thanks for the links. I will look at them now.

      • JeffH

        Kate8, I remember…and there was a time when I’d have to bite my tongue if I thought a comment9not just yours)was “out there” because I’m convinced that anything is possible. Like you said, it’s just the tip of the iceberg. It’s all about educating the masses and the best way is to exchange info back and forth between the masses. It’s got to be upsetting to the PTB, the amount of information being posted and exchanged…”people power”!

      • JeffH

        Thanks for the letting me know Bob.

      • Jeff

        Just put a crown and a little moustache on Rubio so you don’t have to worry about his birthplace. I think he was born in Miami but how can you be 100% certain his father wasn’t Castro? Be afraid. Be very afraid.

      • JeffH

        Another troll shows up.

      • Jeff

        Of course, Feinstein has no access to actual information concerning the law as it actually is. I’m sure she spends a lot of time worrying about your silly lawsuits, all of which have been dismissed because they have no merit. After 8 years of W, you can’t find a single wingnut judge who agrees with you. What does that tell you?

      • JeffH

        …that you’re a troll…

    • David

      Our Senate is being run by Pelosi,It seems? If our Senators don’t have the stones to do their job, they need to step down.The left will only get bolder as they get away with one more obserity after another.Our current Senators are more concerned with their own wealth than working for the People!! If they can’t remove emperor obama,then they better get used to getting on on one knee,washing his feet an kissing his ass forever!!

    • john

      ….congress is at fault also. but obama has attacked our laws and constitution, since day one!! then, he just makes up a law, so he will get away with it!!

      • Flashy

        What law did he “make up” ?

    • nc

      Vigilant, do they “fail to indicate fidelity” to THEIR’ oath if they do not interpret the Constitution the same as you? Where in the Constitution does it say “see old Vigilant for the truth?” Such arrogance!! The trademark of the wingnuts!!

      • Vigilant

        Great ad hominem comment (NOT).

        You must be really peeved that I destroyed your “stock market loves Democrats” BS so completely that you can’t post it any more without embarrassing yourself. Without that single fabrication, you have NOTHING of note to contribute so you resort to insults alone.

        As for interpretation of the Constitution, I guarantee you, sonny, that I have more knowledge about our heritage in my little finger than you have in your pea brain.

      • Vigilant

        P.S. Speaking of interpretation of the Constitution, you need to read Mr. Wood’s article again, this time with an English tutor. Your grand poobah of a president HIMSELF previously furnished the reasons why he couldn’t legally do precisely what he just did. Suggest you talk to Obama himself about arrogance and abuse of power.

    • http://none Dave

      Trouble iz; no-one Enforces the laws- or is allowed to. Country needs real leaders, not followers, or opportunists. This Nation was founded on muscle and the Will to be free & choose how freedom should be instituted. Leave his dik alone & let them do that in Paraguay for you, Nave. There are probably more votes down there for him anyway.

    • Rocky

      They will all be held accountable for their action or non action,no one does anything to him
      is it because his mentors are watching (obummer)he is doing what they won’t,they cover for him, a sitting Senator cannot accept a job in another position,but look at Hilbilary she is
      almost sitting in his lap,she is one of obummers minions,don’t be found around them when
      the Lord returns…not me I won’t be in their neighbor hood.

    • Karen

      Excuse me….just loss of office??? R u kidding??? How about being heavily fined and imprisoned….

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom