Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

Obama Ready To Campaign Openly As A Marxist

May 2, 2012 by  

Obama Ready To Campaign Openly As A Marxist
SCREENSHOT
The Barack Obama campaign revealed its slogan on Monday.

President Barack Obama feels emboldened. He’s sensing victory in November, so he’s beginning to telegraph the way “Forward.”

“Forward.” was unveiled as Obama’s campaign slogan. It’s a word with strong ties to Marxism and socialism. “Forward!” (note the exclamation point) was a popular name for Communist and radical publications and entities during the 19th and 20th centuries. Obama’s slogan contains a period.

The Washington Times posits that the Obama campaign didn’t look backward into history when it selected “Forward.” as its campaign slogan. That’s not true. The Obama campaign has Marxists and socialists in its midst. It’s inconceivable the Marxists and communists in Obama’s campaign didn’t know the history of “Forward.” The campaign is a masterful marketing organization.

Obama himself is a Marxist. His mentor — and likely biological father — was the communist Frank Marshall Davis. Obama referred to him as “Pops” in his book, Dreams from my Father. Obama’s mother and grandparents — longtime friends of Davis — were also communists. His political career was launched from the home of the communist terrorist Bill Ayers. Obama belonged to the socialist New Party in Chicago in the mid-90s. In 1996 Obama received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in his bid for the State Senate.

I often see it written or hear it said that Obama is stupid, clueless or out of touch. Don’t be deceived. Obama and his minions know what they are doing.

There are now 76 members of Congress who belong to the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC). CPC was founded in 1991 by socialist Bernie Sanders. The DSA has been closely linked to the CPC for years. It hosted the CPC website in the beginning. The Communist Party USA identifies CPC members as “allies.”

According to a Pew Research Center poll released in December 2011, 31 percent of Americans view socialism in positive terms. Only 50 percent polled view capitalism in positive terms. A Rasmussen poll from last summer gave similar numbers: 53 percent to 47 percent prefer capitalism to socialism.

For the Obama campaign to boldly select “Forward.” as its slogan indicates Obama and his backers think the battle is won. In their minds, the transformation of the United States to a communist country is as good as done.

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American who has been writing a newsletter since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Obama Ready To Campaign Openly As A Marxist”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • MAP

    You hit a nerve, Bob. The liberal/communist nuts are swarming your site today. These cretins operate through subversion and stealth. Ignorance is their main tool. You bring to light what they wish to conceal.

  • MAP

    I posted this link once before. It lists the 45 declared goals of the communists. The list was delivered in the House of Representatives in 1963. It is interesting to read through the list and notice how many of the goals are in operation today. None were in operation in 1963!
    http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm

    • Joe Brooks

      4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
      5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
      6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
      7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Naked_Communist

      • nc

        Joe, in a totally free trade society with no government regulations on big businesses should a big business engaged in “defense work” be allowed to trade with a Communist or Muslim country for materials or technology essential for our national defense ???Or should Congress be allowed to restrict the ” totally free trade”? Isn’t that like being “a little bit pregnant”?Or Rule by (*)?
        It appears to me that “compromise” on these issues in Congress and the White House is what got us to Number One in the world and has kept us there! You do remember “compromise” don’t you?? It was an approach to governing before this last House came into being!!

      • Joe Brooks

        nc, no currently successful nation practices free trade and the US did not from 1789 to 1970. Protectionism leads to being number one, as anyone can see by looking at the most protectionist nation on earth, Red China. Please read this and step back and look at the 10 trillion dollar US trade deficit over the last 20 years and all of the capablities we have lost. The conclusions are inescapable.

        Free Trade -> Misery -> Social Revolution.
        (1) Karl Marx on Free Trade (2) Frederick Engels on Free Trade (3) Trotskyists for Free Trade
        (1) Karl Marx on Free Trade
        Karl Marx’s major statement about Free Trade was an address delivered to the Democratic association of Brussels, Belgium, on January 9, 1848, around the same time as he wrote the Communist Manifesto.
        “Moreover, the Protective system is nothing but a means of establishing manufacture upon a large scale in any given country, that is to say, of making it dependent upon the market of the world: and from the moment that dependence upon the market of the world is established, there is more or less dependence upon Free Trade too. Besides this, the Protective system helps to develop free competition within a nation. Hence we see that in countries where the bourgeoisie is beginning to make itself felt as a class, in Germany for example, it makes great efforts to obtain Protective duties. They serve the bourgeoisie as weapons against feudalism and absolute monarchy, as a means for the concentration of its own powers for the realization of Free Trade within the country.
        But, generally speaking, the Protective system in these days is conservative, while the Free Trade system works destructively. It breaks up old nationalities and carries antagonism of proletariat and bourgeoisie to the uttermost point. In a word, the Free Trade system hastens the Social Revolution. In this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, I am in favor of Free Trade.”

        http://mailstar.net/classwar.html
        “Hence we see that in countries where the bourgeoisie is beginning to make itself felt as a class, in Germany for example, it makes great efforts to obtain Protective duties. They serve the bourgeoisie as weapons against feudalism and absolute monarchy, as a means for the concentration of its own powers for the realization of Free Trade within the country.”
        Here he describes the American School of Economics, that promoted middle class [bourgeoisie] success. Free trade is a backdoor way to Communism. This is obvious when you look at our trade deficits with Communist China, Caste System India, Mexico and the pending agreement with Communist Brazil. The current Mexican Constitution was written by a Commie and the US considered Mexico Bolshevik until the 70s, when “free trade” became popular.

        On “free trade” there is no difference between BO and Romney.

        It is 20 years past time to hammer the Communist front organizations that promote “free trade” back to the foreign nations and multi national corporations that finance the “free trade” political propaganda payoff machine. They can take the illegal immigrants with them.

  • Doc Sarvis

    One freaking word does not a communist manifesto make.

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      Obama’s greatest claim to fame is that he was a “community organizer.” Maybe you should start by learning what a “community organizer” is…Mr. Swan. Then study Obama heroes, like Saul Alinsky and Bill Ayers.

      • Doc Sarvis

        I read President Obama’s bood “Dreams From My Father” which details his life including his time in Chicago as a community organizer so I know what he did. It was good work to help folks have more control of their circumstances.

        One’s heros do not define someone but one’s work and actions do. President Obama has done a lot of good in his life (personal and professional). Nobody is perfect but Mr. Obama is a fine man, Christian, and American.

      • Doc Sarvis

        …President Obama’s book

      • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

        Dear Doc Sarvis,

        You write: “Mr. Obama is a fine man, Christian, and American.” Please provide proof of any one of those assertions.

        Best wishes,
        Bob

      • Doc Sarvis

        Bob,
        He married an intellegent woman and they have two healthy happy children. He goes to Christian churches, refers to his Christian faith consistently even bringing it into some of his speaches. Only Americans can be elected President and having been born in HI he is all American. There’s plenty more.

      • Average Joe

        Doc Sarvis,

        I must admit…you are not even the sharpest bowling ball at the bowling alley….let alone the sharpest tack in the box.

        Many people “claim” to be many things, it doesn’t make it true. I once knew a guy who was a homosexual…he married a woman ( for appearances) because he was in politics and didn’t want the homsexual stygma attached to his campaign…he remained married to this woman for 18 years ( who was a lesbian ) until he left politics. After leaving public life, he divorced her and came out openly as a practicing homosexual. I also know many folks who go to church every week…but they don’t practice what they are taught… during the rest of the week. In other words, going to church doesn’t make you a Christian…living the life of a Christian however…does (even if one does not attend a single “church event”).

        Doc, you may want to take a course on critical thinking…..and stop believing everything your “Idols” tell you to believe….ignorance can be fixed…stupidity can’t.

        Before you come-back with your usual whining…don’t bother…I don’t care about your opinion…..as I’ve stated…they are simply uneducated bantor and have no value…to thinking people.

        No statement should be believed because it is made by an authority.
        Robert A. Heinlein

      • Doc Sarvis

        Average Joe, You probably CLAIM to be a heterosexual. Ha Ha, your secret is safe with me.

      • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

        Dear Doc Sarvis,

        You write: “He married an intellegent (sic) woman and they have two healthy happy children.” Irrelevant.

        You write: “He goes to Christian churches, refers to his Christian faith consistently even bringing it into some of his speaches (sic).” I would not consider the church he attended for most of his adult life a Christian church. http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/03/trinity-united.html

        Rarely does he go to church today. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-blackberry-faith-white-house/story?id=9689272#.T6FOqdX7Wsk http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_09/025744.php Christians are to attend services. “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching,” Hebrews 10:25 (KJV)

        He has also spoken of his Muslim faith. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVn59TC2QqM
        The two are mutually exclusive. His claims to be Christian are irrelevant. Anyone can make the claim. It’s how one lives that determines the truth.

        You write: “Only Americans can be elected President and having been born in HI he is all American.” Please provide proof he was born in Hawaii. Sheriff Arpaio continues to seek it. Please provide proof he is all American. His claims in his own book that his father is Obama Sr. would exclude him from the Presidency as he would not fulfill the “natural-born” requirements.

        There is plenty more.

        Best wishes,
        Bob

        P.S. You have still not fulfilled your charge.

      • sesame

        Even the Republican Party and other conservative organizations have studied Alinsky’s tactics. Not that they agree with his philosophy, but they do see he advantage of his tactics

      • Average Joe

        Doc,

        As usual, ignore the message and attack the messenger with personal attacks….Such is the practice of those who have nothing to offer in their own defense. Please cover yourself…your stupidity (AKA lack of intelligence) is showing…ewwwwww….
        I haven’t claimed to be anything at all, but I believe that there are many women who would disagree with you on your ASSumption of my private sex life …which, BTW is nobody’s business but my own.

      • Flashy

        “I would not consider the church he attended for most of his adult life a Christian church. http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/03/trinity-united.html
        ———-
        Mr. Livingston…an opinion from a conservative website is to be treated as gospel as to the correctness of “christianity” of a church? I would not consider a conservative website to be the declarative final stance of the correctness of a religious affiliation. Would you consider it to be declarative should a liberal or progressive website was pasted as an authority of correctness of a religious affiliation? If such is your aceptable test…then i will gladly paste links to several progressive and liberal websites attesting to the “christianity’ of the Trinity Church.

        Would you consider Wiki as an appropriate ‘test’ of correctness?

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_United_Church_of_Christ
        ============
        “Christians are to attend services. “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching,” Hebrews 10:25 (KJV)”

        Bush attended church infrequently over the past eight years and did not belong to a Washington congregation..same as President Obama, and Reagan was known to seldom attend services and did not belong to any congregation. Would you cast doubt as to either being a “christian” ?

        Are you stating that to be a ‘christian’ one must accept the corporate worship of the Christian God.?

        ============
        “It’s how one lives that determines the truth.”
        —–
        He is not known to curse, he gives to charities, he was married in a christian church, his daughters were baptized in a christian church, he regularly invokes the word of God and quotes from the Bible. Would you please clarify how he lives that is “unchristian” ? What would be the “correct’ denomination to qualify for being a “christian”? Adhere to the KJV of the Bible and not to any other? Is that the test?
        =============

        “Please provide proof he is all American. His claims in his own book that his father is Obama Sr. would exclude him from the Presidency as he would not fulfill the “natural-born” requirements.”
        —-
        The ‘natural born’ interpretation you cite is not one universally recognized. The Courts have tossed every case challenging his eligibility. I would think that if the courts have ruled he is eligible, then it is not upon his supporters to prove more than what the courts have stated and ruled.
        ============

        That is a quick opinion humble response. I’m certain Doc will add to it if needed. If you desire to clarify some of the questions i asked so as to be certain of the accepted basis … I’d be appreciative.

        Thank you.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        flashy, going to church is not a criteria for selecting a president. The constitution forbids using a religion as a test for office. Obama is entitled to be Islamic if he desires. My question is: did Obama ever come out and say he was a Muslim or did he try to portray himself as a Christian? My objection is to deceit. Can you trust anybody who is deceitful?

      • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

        Dear Flashy,

        You write: “Would you consider it to be declarative should a liberal or progressive website was pasted as an authority of correctness of a religious affiliation? If such is your aceptable test…then i will gladly paste links to several progressive and liberal websites attesting to the “christianity’ of the Trinity Church. Would you consider Wiki as an appropriate ‘test’ of correctness?” There is but one test: strict adherence to Biblical teachings.

        You write: “Bush attended church infrequently over the past eight years and did not belong to a Washington congregation..same as President Obama, and Reagan was known to seldom attend services and did not belong to any congregation. Would you cast doubt as to either being a “christian” ?” Again with the obfuscation and misdirection?

        You write: “Are you stating that to be a ‘christian’ one must accept the corporate worship of the Christian God.?” See first response above.

        You write: “The ‘natural born’ interpretation you cite is not one universally recognized. The Courts have tossed every case challenging his eligibility. I would think that if the courts have ruled he is eligible, then it is not upon his supporters to prove more than what the courts have stated and ruled.” Irrelevant. First, no court has so ruled. Courts have simply refused to hear evidence based on standing or other reasons. Second, there is no proof he is even a native-born much less natural born citizen. The so-called birth certificate has been shown to be a photoshopped creation, his selective service registration a forgery and his SS number probably fraudulent.

        As an aside, he may very well be a natural-born citizen via who I believe to be his true biological father; Frank Marshall Davis. However, the nativity he claims leaves much in doubt.

        Best wishes,
        Bob

      • Flashy

        Mr. Livingston:

        “” You write: “Would you consider it to be declarative should a liberal or progressive website was pasted as an authority of correctness of a religious affiliation? If such is your aceptable test…then i will gladly paste links to several progressive and liberal websites attesting to the “christianity’ of the Trinity Church. Would you consider Wiki as an appropriate ‘test’ of correctness?”

        There is but one test: strict adherence to Biblical teachings.
        ———-
        Yet you posted a link to a conservative website as “proof”the Trinity Church was not a Christian Church. …[I would not consider the church he attended for most of his adult life a Christian church. http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/03/trinity-united.html%5D.

        i’m confused when you state the one test is strict adherence to Biblical teachings. Since there are many sects which have differing interpretations of the bible, would one suffice or is there one particular sect which is the one “test”? Catholic? Protestant? Baptist? Southern Baptist?
        ====================

        “” You write: “Bush attended church infrequently over the past eight years and did not belong to a Washington congregation..same as President Obama, and Reagan was known to seldom attend services and did not belong to any congregation. Would you cast doubt as to either being a “christian” ?”

        Again with the obfuscation and misdirection?
        ——————
        No. I am attempting to have more of a direction from you as to your ‘test’ you have put upon whether this President is a “christian”.

        You had written that “Christians are to attend services.” and followed with the quote “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching,” Hebrews 10:25 (KJV)

        I am asking if such is your test, how would you characterize the “christianity” of Presidents Bush I and II and Reagan? Would you refer to them as being a christian? And if so, as they would not meet the test you yourself put forth, how would they ? You apply the one test to President Obama, would you not also apply it to all Presidents?
        =========

        “” You write: “Are you stating that to be a ‘christian’ one must accept the corporate worship of the Christian God.?”

        See first response above.
        ——
        Uh Uh Mr. Livingston. Your response is evasion. i am not misdirecting. i am seeking clarification. You have stated regular attendance of services is required for a christian. I am asking if you believe to be a christian one MUSt attend regularly and accept corporatism as part of christianity or if one can be a christian without being in regular attendance in church.

        You put forth the proposition President Obama is not a christian. I am asking about the elements of your test and the application of these on an objective basis…or is it subjective according to whom is being examined?
        ===================

        “” You write: “The ‘natural born’ interpretation you cite is not one universally recognized. The Courts have tossed every case challenging his eligibility. I would think that if the courts have ruled he is eligible, then it is not upon his supporters to prove more than what the courts have stated and ruled.”

        Irrelevant. First, no court has so ruled. Courts have simply refused to hear evidence based on standing or other reasons. Second, there is no proof he is even a native-born much less natural born citizen. The so-called birth certificate has been shown to be a photoshopped creation, his selective service registration a forgery and his SS number probably fraudulent. As an aside, he may very well be a natural-born citizen via who I believe to be his true biological father; Frank Marshall Davis. However, the nativity he claims leaves much in doubt.
        ——————
        Mr. Livingston…unless one claims there is a vast conspiracy involving darn near every court in every jurisdiction, I find it difficult to believe that should there be a sound and rational legal question on the eligibility of President Obama to hold the office would not get past first base. State and federal Courts have universally tossed any claim that he is ineligible to hold office.

        i do not think nor believe you are claiming such a vast jurisdictional conspiracy exists..up to and including the SCOTUS. So i am at a loss as to the basis you are making a claim contrary to darn near every court in the Land, including Administrative Courts. .

        To be on a ballot, there are eligibility requirements to meet. to date, there has not been a question by any state as to the qualifications of Pres. Obama to hold office. to stand with every court and every state is not irrelevant. it is sound reasoning that of the hundreds of cases brought, and upon the reviews of every state, that pres. obama is eligible. To deny these bodies of law is….well….

        Thank you

        .

      • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

        Dear Flashy,

        Your questions have been sufficiently answered. If you are confused I suggest you go back and read them again.

        Best wishes,
        Bob

      • JeffH

        Doc says :He goes to Christian churches, refers to his Christian faith consistently even bringing it into some of his speaches.”

        Doc, I’ve posted this for you before and I’ll post it for you now.
        Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing.

        While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer.” (By Richard Poe, 11-27-07)

    • Airangel

      Doc you know in your heart it’s not “one freaking workd” but a compilation of statements and actions…how anyone can support a regime bent on destroying a society of people out of a misguided hate is despicable. All the hard working citizens and their families deserve much better!

      • Doc Sarvis

        Yes, I know that President Obama should be judged on his performance. By that measure he has done pretty well for our country. See:
        http://obamaachievements.org/list

      • http://stoshwolfen.wordpress.com Stoshwolfen

        For Doc Sarvis:

        Yeah, I read that list. Nothing positive on it — just a bunch of expanded bureaucracy and wasteful government spending.

        He can’t even take credit for bin Laden because the policy was in place from 2003 and BamBam took FIVE MONTHS to decide to pull the trigger. LOL

    • Flashy

      Thank you Mr. Livingston. With your last response, you have indeed answered my questions.

  • Steve E

    It’s really sad that people do not understand the Constitution. It is written so plainly that even my mentally retarded brother can understand it. Many people find interpretations in the Constitution to try to support their argument, but the meaning they interpret is not really there. Don’t try interpret the Constitution, just read what is says. You don’t have to think too much.

    • Doc Sarvis

      Tell that to the Supreme Court (from any year in our history).

    • sesame

      So, why do we have all these split decisions by the Supreme Court?

    • nc

      Steve, you say the Constitution, the best ever written, is so easy to understand that your retarded brother can read it and UNDERSTAND it,

      Have you ever been to a library that has the entire collection of the US SUPREME DECISIONS since the Constitution was written! Volumes and volumes of cases where our greatest minds FROM THE VERY BEGINNING HAVE DIFFEREDas to what the Costitution SAYS OR MEANS!! WE’RE TALKING EVEN CONSERVATIVES GOING TO COURT AGAINST OTHER CONSERVATIVE TO HAVE IT DECIDED WHAT A PARTICULAR WORD, PASSAGE OR PHRASE ACTUALLY MEANS.

      i WILL ADMIT THAT YOUR RETARDED BROTHER COULD HAVE DECIDED SOME OF THE DISPUTES BETTER THAN THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED THEM BUT THAT IS AN INTIRELY DIFFERENT MATTER!
      iT’S “PLAIN” ONLY IF THEY AGREE WITH YOU BUT THAT IS NOT THE AMERICAN WAY ACCORDING TO GUESS WHAT? THE US CONSTITUTION!!

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        nc, your capitalizing your remark indicates to me that you’d like to scream at somebody. The fact is that the Constitution is simple to understand except for people who have agendas that go contrary to it. That’s why so many cases end up in court: due to conflicts of interest and not to any difficult verbiage on the part of the constitution. Another issue here: the definition of words. It’s easy to get the wrong impression when you don’t understand the meaning or the context of words. Progressives are good at changing the meaning of words for the purpose of confusion.

      • Steve E

        Katrael, Can’t say it any better. You hit the nail on the head. Thank you.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        You’re welcome. I just don’t like nc’s style nor do I agree with him/her. The constitution is short and to the point especially compared to most laws forced on us today.

  • Mirage

    Bob Livingston …. ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh-myyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy- Goddddddddddddddddddd…. FOREWARD IS SUCH A SCARY WORD!!!!!
    What a relief to see you are right on with identifying code words and able to decipher “FORWARD” as the Left’s code for COMMUNISM/MARXISM! They almost got one by us! Thank god you’re here to tell us what to think today.
    Hey look … is that … is the sky falling … perhaps our water’s flouride is just making me see things????

    • http://stoshwolfen.wordpress.com Stoshwolfen

      Ridicule? Sure proof that a nerve has been hit. :)

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        especially fun when the paid staff of leftist wh basement workers becomes overactive with sarcasm. You do know you hit a nerve – or they are afraid you’re right and all their work has been for naught – they may be slowly discovering, (they aren’t that quick) that they have been had by hope and change —- :)

    • Neil Swan

      Forward doesn’t mean comunist. It means progressing. There are too many stupid people making comments on these email topics. Obviously they have never worked for a technology company, where you knew you had to move forward to stay in business. Moving forward means more progress and more knowlege provision.

      Neil

      • JeffH

        Neil, a little education for you.

        The slogan “Forward” carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other left-wing newspapers and publications.”

        The slogan “Forward!” reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.”
        http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/apr/30/new-obama-slogan-has-long-ties-marxism-socialism/

  • Les

    I’m guessing DOWN is the new UP too. Is he saying we will now move FORWARD? or that we have been moving FORWARD. Someone needs to hand him a dictionary. This is what happens when you put someone in charge that has ZERO experience in anything.

    Sadly too many takers will march into the voting booths and vote for ZERO. Welfare Recipients, Unions, Socialists, Communists, Federal, State & Local Employees, etc.

    Way too many control freaks in the mix too.

    • nc

      Les. I am 76 years old and a History major in college. In EVERY ELECTION AT LEAST SINCE 1932 the Democrat nominee has been referred by some Republicans as a Socialist/Marxist whose election will be the end of our economic system and the take over of our Republic! CHECK IT OUT!! THAT’S 80 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN KOOL AID THAT HAS DULLED THE BRAIN OF THE RIGHT WING!

      Are you really interested in just how big that 80 year LIE has been that electing those Socialist/Marxist Democrats will ruin our economy???? Just go “Bulls. bears, donkeys and elephants” site see how our free market stock market performed in those 80 years under the socialist?Marxist Democrats administrations as compared to the rich-catering Republican administrations in the same time span! Go look! Just type in “Bulls, Bears, Donkeys and Elephants” Remember the old saying of ” The stock market loves the (socialsit/marxist) Democrats.” Well here is the reason!
      Also don’t forget that those Socialist/Marxist Democrats lead us to victory against the Nazis and the fascist and drove (Kennedy) the Communist Russians back to Russia!

      I’ll take the Democrat achievements in making this the greatest place in the world to live against the likes of hoover,nixon and daddy’s boy bush anyday.

      • sesame

        Great Post!

      • Flashy

        A trivia question for you. What was the last GOP winner of a Presidential election that didn’t have a Nixon or Bush on the ticket?

        Taking that, then matching with Bulls bears elephants etc site…kinda makes one sit back and wonder about GOP controllers a tad doesn’t it.

  • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

    Rep. Allen West’s comments about alleged communists in Congress have led to what West calls “A lot of buzz and inaccurate reporting” in the media. Some reporters have nitpicked West on whether he has concrete proof of actual card-carrying members of the Communist Party USA in the Congress.

    Politico called him a McCarthyite and actually quoted a spokesman for the Communist Party as saying that West didn’t know what he was talking about.

    But the alternative media, led by rebel pundit, have been covering the story of how the international communist movement, responsible for about one hundred million dead, is very much alive and has collaborators in the U.S. Congress.

    Rebel Pundit is the work of Jeremy Segal, a disciple of the late Andrew Breitbart who produced the recent video of Rep. Danny K. Davis being honored by the People’s World at the Communist Party U.S.A.’s headquarters in Chicago for a lifetime of “inspiring leadership.”Politico called him a McCarthyite and actually quoted a spokesman for the Communist Party as saying that West didn’t know what he was talking about.

    Davis serves on the Homeland Security Committee where his subcommittee assignments are the Subcommittee on Transportation and the Subcommittee on Oversight. He is also a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

    When Segal started questioning the congressman outside the party headquarters, CPUSA members and a Davis handler wearing an Obama jacket tried to intervene to protect Davis from further questioning, with one person calling Segal “disgusting.” Segal protested, “Don’t touch me!”

    But rather than highlight the case against Davis, who has represented the Chicago-area 7th Congressional District of Illinois since 1996, Chicago Tribune columnist and editorial writer Steve Chapman called West “an embarrassment to the party” for his anti-communist remarks and suggested that he be condemned or expelled from the GOP caucus in the House.

    In a brief telephone interview, Chapman, who is labeled a “conservative” by the Townhall website, told AIM that he had never heard of or seen the Davis video, which was originally released through a Breitbart website on March 12. He said he would determine whether it is newsworthy if a link to the video was emailed to him. It has been done.

    Although the Davis video got some coverage locally in Chicago, on Fox News and by Investor’s Business Daily (IBD), Segal said he wants to see more media pick up the story, especially because of its national security implications. “This is something that should be front page on the Chicago Tribune,” he said. Instead, however, Tribune columnist Chapman claims no knowledge of the video and bashes West for using inexact language in calling attention to the problem.

    “I believe there’s about 78 to 81 members of the Democrat Party who are members of the Communist Party,” West had said. “It’s called the Congressional Progressive Caucus.” Though serious, he was apparently using the term communist in a loose way, to suggest a far-left or radical “progressive” approach, and also to identify what have traditionally been called “fellow travelers” of the CPUSA.

    Indeed, there is abundant evidence of members of Congress cooperating and collaborating with the Communist Party and its front groups, with Davis being only one concrete example. But the major media won’t cover the information because of their apparent fear that such coverage would itself be labeled McCarthyite.

    Unafraid of the negative attacks, Segal reports “from the belly of the beast” in Chicago and was inspired by Andrew Breitbart to become a citizen journalist. “I became a disciple of Andrew’s in the media battle we’re in.” His Davis video is the biggest yet and has the potential to highlight communist influence in the Congress as well as the Obama Administration, since Davis and Obama are long-time friends.

    Rep. West clearly understands the media war as well and said about the controversy over his comments: “The press wants to write gotcha stories and talk semantics, but just look at the words and actions of the [Congressional] Progressive Caucus. You can call them socialist, Marxist, communist or whatever you want, but the point is, they oppose free markets and individual economic freedom, they want to redistribute wealth, and they want to see the nation fundamentally transformed.

    Their policies are destructive and I will stand up to them regardless of the critics. Members of this Caucus lavished praise on Fidel Castro following a 2009 visit, just to name one example. The Communist Party USA claims the Progressive Caucus as its ‘ally.’”

    West was referring to a 2009 visit to Cuba by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Cal.), Bobby L. Rush (D-Ill.) and Emanuel Cleaver II (D-Mo.), who met Fidel Castro. Rush said about Raul Castro, “I think that what really surprised me, but also endeared me to him, was his keen sense of humor, his sense of history and his basic human qualities.”

    Lee began her career in the California state legislature as a secret member of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a spin-off from the Communist Party.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45947

    • Flashy

      “Rep. Allen West’s comments about alleged communists in Congress have led to what West calls “A lot of buzz and inaccurate reporting” in the media.”

      Actually….the town hall was taped…openly…and West made no claims aboput ‘alleged Communists’…he flat out stated it along with the numbers 78-81 verified.

      Not exactly a person whom would be considered having all the bulbs lit on the XMas tree….

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        A man of courage and integrity!

  • http://jheasler12175.wordpress.com jheasler12175

    Morons that believe communism will bring us to a state where we are all “equal” and all of our needs will be equally met are naieve at best, and either delusional or stupid at worst. The truth is that under communism we would just be exchanging one ruling class for another that is totalitarian in nature. There will be the ruling class and the ruled, subject to the idialogical whims and punitive excesses of the rulers. Look at any country that has or has had a communist government. Stalin and Mao have killed more people for political reasons than died in both world wars put together. Obama’s friends, during the years they were formulating their long range goals estimated that approximately 30 million Americans would have to be either re-educated or “eliminated” in order for them to achieve their goals of implementing communism in the USA. Congress, if not clueless, is gutless and will not act to turn this traitor out of office. God help us if we don’t vote him out in November if that is possible. Votes counted in Spain by God only knows who, no ID required at the polls, and newly revealed evidence of mass democrat cheating at the pools in 2008 don’t bode well for our chances in 2012. If things continue as they are, I predict that there will be a bloodshed with the results determining whether we will remain a democratic republic or a nation of slaves ruled by a few communists at the top.

    • Joe Brooks

      Free Trade -> Misery -> Social Revolution.
      (1) Karl Marx on Free Trade (2) Frederick Engels on Free Trade (3) Trotskyists for Free Trade
      (1) Karl Marx on Free Trade
      Karl Marx’s major statement about Free Trade was an address delivered to the Democratic association of Brussels, Belgium, on January 9, 1848, around the same time as he wrote the Communist Manifesto.

      “Moreover, the Protective system is nothing but a means of establishing manufacture upon a large scale in any given country, that is to say, of making it dependent upon the market of the world: and from the moment that dependence upon the market of the world is established, there is more or less dependence upon Free Trade too. Besides this, the Protective system helps to develop free competition within a nation. Hence we see that in countries where the bourgeoisie is beginning to make itself felt as a class, in Germany for example, it makes great efforts to obtain Protective duties. They serve the bourgeoisie as weapons against feudalism and absolute monarchy, as a means for the concentration of its own powers for the realization of Free Trade within the country.

      But, generally speaking, the Protective system in these days is conservative, while the Free Trade system works destructively. It breaks up old nationalities and carries antagonism of proletariat and bourgeoisie to the uttermost point. In a word, the Free Trade system hastens the Social Revolution. In this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, I am in favor of Free Trade.”

      http://mailstar.net/classwar.html

      • Joe Brooks

        “Hence we see that in countries where the bourgeoisie is beginning to make itself felt as a class, in Germany for example, it makes great efforts to obtain Protective duties. They serve the bourgeoisie as weapons against feudalism and absolute monarchy, as a means for the concentration of its own powers for the realization of Free Trade within the country.”

        Here he describes the American School of Economics, that promoted middle class [bourgeoisie] success. Free trade is a backdoor way to Communism. This is obvious when you look at our trade deficits with Communist China, Caste System India, Mexico and the pending agreement with Communist Brazil. The current Mexican Constitution was written by a Commie and the US considered Mexico Bolshevik until the 70s, when “free trade” became popular.

        On “free trade” there is no difference between BO and Romney.

        It is 20 years past time to hammer the Communist front organizations that promote “free trade” back to the foreign nations and multi national corporations that finance the “free trade” political propaganda payoff machine. They can take the illegal immigrants with them.

  • michaeljbeglinjr

    Why is anybody surprised by this? It has been known for a long time that Obama is a Socialist. The endorsement from the American Communist Party is just icing on the cake. If I were a republican campaign manger, I would be telling everyone about THAT endorsement.

    • http://stoshwolfen.wordpress.com Stoshwolfen

      While the charge of “communist” or “socialist” resonates with conservatives, most others say, “So? Isn’t that just another political thing?”

      • Flashy

        it’s because anyone who is not a radical right conservative is called a Commie or a Socialist.

        just a reminder..today, Reagan wouldn’t win a primary with these guys and he’d be termed a ‘subversive Commie’ because of his labor connections and positions he took while campaigning. And I have read it here several times goldwater was a RINO and Buckley wasn’t a ‘true Conservative’ …

        All one can do is chuckle at the absurdities…

      • Average Joe

        “All one can do is chuckle at the absurdities…”

        And we do so regularly…whenever you open your yap….please continue with your words of wit….we all enjoy the humor factor that you add to the conversation… go ahead send me back some more of your wit there ,Flashy….I enjoy the Laughs.

      • DaveH

        To Flashman, anyone who is not a Socialist or a Commie is a “radical” right conservative. And True Conservatives, Flashman, are not right-wingers.

      • Dennis48e

        “I have read it here several times goldwater was a RINO and Buckley wasn’t a ‘true Conservative’ …”{

        Thats odd flushy (Opal’s interpretation of his name) I have NEVER read either of those on this site.

  • roger gunderson

    Exactly, what has Obama done to improve our country? Obama is a very charismatic person and therefore has the capacity to fool people into following him. Hitler and Jim Jones come to mind. Only people who have the capacity to seperate the chaff from the grain can see that this is a man of no substance; in fact , a man who is ruining America. He is a man of only reaction and poor reaction at that. He does not have a ounce of leadership in him. His distingushed honor is he can fool most of the people most of the time.

    • http://stoshwolfen.wordpress.com Stoshwolfen

      Don’t underestimate him. He knows exactly what he is doing and he is doing it exceptionally well. Proof? Even conservatives think he’s just stupid instead of recognizing that he is an evil genius.

      • Doc Sarvis

        HA HA HA, “evil genius”. You crack me up! Who even puts those two words together and expects to be taken seriously?

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        The man is evil but he’s no genius. He does what he’s told to do. He says what he’s told to say. He can’t even speak publically without a teleprompter. When forced to speak without one he repeats the same memorized lines over and over, no matter where he is or who he’s speaking to. He’s an idiot, nothing but a puppet who was born and bred for the job!

      • DaveH

        Who makes regular ignorant remarks, Doc, and then expects people to believe he is a Doc of anything?

    • Doc Sarvis

      Here is a list of what has been achieved under President Obama’s Administration.
      http://obamaachievements.org/list
      I am sure you will not agree all of these are positive but if you are honest you will agree a lot of them have helped our country.

      • sesame

        Good Post

      • Patriot1776

        Doc, looking through the list what I see is 1) Increase deficit spending, 2)Increase the size and scope of government, 3) Ignore the Constitution – it’s too limiting, 4) Promote perversion and support hate groups (LGBT, etc.), 5) A lot of action items that haven’t happened, might be thought about, or are just pure filler material.

        Yes, what a great post. I wonder, does the EPA know that such a pile of bovine feces exists?

      • DaveH

        Now look through this list, Doc, and tell us where in Article I, Section 8, Obama is given the Power to do those things?
        https://www.cato.org/constitution/article1_en.html

        Where does Obama get the money to do those things? From other peoples’ wallets of course. You would call it Compassion. I call it Theft.

      • DaveH

        This particular category cracks me up — Government Efficiency.
        The man builds up a $5 Trillion dollar debt, which is growing at about $1.5 Trillion a year, and you honestly expect people to believe that Obama is creating Government Efficiency?
        What is wrong with you Liberals?

  • http://n/a AmFer

    I hope O is continually ‘emboldened’ – finally, he is being forthright instead of humming and hawing to get his ‘real’ agenda across with innuendos. Keep it coming! Emboldened now, humbled and defeated later.

  • Doc Sarvis

    Now Mr. Livingston and others here are trying to invoke fear of a single word. Absurd!

    • MAP

      Doc, you are obviously a communist shill. Therefore, you are a liar and anything you have to say on the matter is of no account.

    • http://gravatar.com/bychoosing Jay

      With the release of a 40-page “Unfit for Publication” report attacking Jerome Corsi’s new book, The Obama Nation, it should be obvious that the media-backed presidential candidate, Barack Obama, is terrified of having his carefully concealed communist and foreign connections exposed to public view.

      However, the Obama campaign’s attack on Corsi’s book and Corsi personally acknowledges on pages 9 and 10 of its report that the mysterious “Frank” in Obama’s 1995 book, Dreams From My Father, is in fact the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) member Frank Marshall Davis. This identification by AIM and others hasn’t been disputed by the media, which has desperately tried to ignore the Obama-Davis relationship, but the Obama campaign has not responded to it until now.

      The admission that Obama’s mentor was Frank Marshall Davis, an identified CPUSA member, can only add to growing public concern about Obama’s relationship with a Communist pawn of Moscow who was the subject of security investigations by the FBI and various congressional committees which examined Soviet activities in the U.S.

      According to these official documents, cited first by AIM and also by Corsi in his book, Davis was a secret CPUSA member who became a member of an underground communist apparatus in Hawaii. As late as the 1970s, Davis was involved with a CPUSA front organization, the American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born, dedicated to keeping foreign communists such as labor leader Harry Bridges from being deported from the U.S. Davis, a friend of Bridges, a secret CPUSA member, became Obama’s mentor during the years 1975-1979.

      But the Obama report makes no admission that Davis was a communist and doesn’t dispute anything Corsi documents about Davis’s membership in the Communist Party. Instead, the report picks and chooses from Obama’s book in order to try to put some distance between Obama and Davis. The report attempts to play down instances in which Obama soaks up Davis’s anti-American thoughts and pro-communist “poetry.”

      But if the relationship were so innocent, why didn’t Obama identify Frank by his full name in his book and denounce his communist and anti-American views? Why doesn’t he denounce those views now?

      At this point, it is clear that Corsi is to Obama what the National Enquirer is to admitted adulterer and liar John Edwards. The Enquirer exposed Edwards secret life when the rest of the media were refusing to investigate the candidate and making fun of the Enquirer.

      It is noteworthy that the Obama campaign’s “Unfit for Publication” report begins with citing negative “reviews” of the Corsi book from various publications, including the New York Times, Washington Post, and Time magazine. The media are angry and jealous because Corsi did the heavy lifting that the media refuse to do.

      While Obama’s communist and foreign connections are of serious and ongoing concern, Corsi’s treatment of Obama’s admitted drug use has emerged as a special raw nerve for the Obama campaign and his media acolytes. They realize that many Americans, whose families have been decimated and destroyed by illegal drugs, may recoil at the thought of having an admitted user of marijuana and cocaine occupy the oval office.

      More here, Mr. Swan: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4490

    • Flashy

      yeah Doc! how dare you call it as it is !

      isn’t it all clear to you? The FEMA camps no one visits to cerify they exist? the black helicopters and the secret treaties with the UN?

      it began when they floridated our water because they KNEW they’d put President Obama in office and control the population with secret mind waves from staellites…

      Thank gawd for Aluminum Beanies to thwart this consipracy on mind control and thus allowing that the true “patriots” can fight the vast conspiracy of the Commies. !

  • rawhp

    The communists that think it’s a done deal in America grossly underestimate real freedom loving Americans. We a are a different breed of cat from all other people in the world. The only reason they would prevail over us is if God wanted it that way.

  • Flashy

    Oh oh i hear the music in the background. RUN FOR YOUR LIVES ! THE COMMIES ARE COMING !

    I found Pres. Obama’s and Jimmy Kimmel’s orations at the recent National Press Banquet to be hilarious. This article and the follow up posts match those for the comedic entertainment. Surely it wasn’t written to be taken seriously…

    • MAP

      And we can believe Flashy, since he is a communist liar and shil, paid to do the lying and the shilling.

    • http://stoshwolfen.wordpress.com Stoshwolfen

      Ridicule? Recognize that tactic. Kind of proves my point.

    • michaeljbeglinjr

      Obama doing that was just another example of his making a mockery of the office of President. We did not elect him to be a stand-up comic. Can you imagine Washington, Jefferson, or Lincoln doing something like that? That was beneath the office he holds, but typical of the man who holds it. He has shown nothing but contempt for the Presidency since he was sworn in.Obama should not be telling jokes, he is a joke.

      • Flashy

        I take it you also state Reagan made a mockery of the office since he attended and joked at the NP banquets in each of his eight years holding office? In the same light heartedness and roasting as President Obama?

    • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

      Dear Flashy,

      It’s written in all seriousness. I notice you ridicule and deflect, but cannot refute. Be gone if you can’t bring something noteworthy to the conversation. You are simply an Obamafile–or better, a simple Obamafile. I’ve grown weary reading your tripe and regurgitation of DNC talking points. Ask your handlers to give you a new assignment. It’s time you go disrupt a different blog.

      Best wishes,
      Bob

      • Windrinker

        Thank you, Mr. Livingston!

        To flashy….”You ridicule and deflect, but cannot refute.”

        I love it!

      • Flashy

        Wind … as a youngster, I grew up in logging country. I am sure some of my classmates …. both in elementary school as well as High School…emerged as Right wing ideologists. As a teen and early 20′s, to put my way through college, i worked for a few small timber companies whose owners were not what anyoe would refer to as “liberal” and they certainly weren’t prounion. I drank beers with them regularly and debated with them as often. I threw chokers, worked as a rigging slinger on the landing, and in the mills i worked the Green Chain and off bearer to the head rig. In college, i took classes from some very Right professors. and today I have friends who are Republicans.

        So…are you saying with those past connections i’m a secret anti environmentalist and TPer?

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        And flashy what was was, and what is is, and you’ve stated part of your job is to be on this site – – - I think you should ask for a different assignment as well – you have no credibility here and look more foolish since you outed yourself a few different times as to your “real work” – and the one the other day was particularly humorous as to what a goof you must be….timing is everything and you messed up.

      • Flashy

        Liberty..i did not, nor have i ever, state part of my job is to be on this site. I have stated i do use this site as part of my overall research to enable me to do my job in a more comprehensive manner. Such is much different than having it as “part of my job”.

        i have stated time and again i do not work for any gov’t nor political party nor anything involved in politics.

        The opinions and writings i express here are my own…no urging nor job required.

        How much plainer can i get?

      • http://folkartist.wordpress.com Libertytrain

        You’re role here is as plain as can be – couldn’t be any more obvious — :)
        enjoy your research for your job – which you also mentioned once before – they don’t seem to match up at all -

      • Dennis48e

        Flashy why should we believe you since you have been proven a lier many times over.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        I think that if we all ignored him and didn’t respond to his baiting he would go away. Don’t even read his posts. Pretend that he is invisible. His only reason for being here is to stir up trouble. He’s a troll! Don’t feed the trolls!

      • JeffH

        Falsy, what you say is called “deflection”…saying that ” I have stated i do use this site as part of my overall research to enable me to do my job in a more comprehensive manner” is typical and does not change the fact that by being here you’re doing a part of your job.

      • JeffH

        Which means you are being paid to be here!

        Despite what you claim, all roads lead to the same conclusion and Mr. Livingston as well as a great majority here figured all of this out while you were posting comments under other alias’s

      • DaveH

        Flashman,
        Why would you bother to relate personal experience, since you have no credibility on this board?
        And for those who are curious as to what Flashman actually said:
        http://personalliberty.com/2012/04/06/do-the-media-want-a-race-war/#comment-572798

    • carrobin

      That story could have come from the Daily Show writers. All it lacks is the line that “the Democrats chose ‘Forward’ because the Republicans bought the rights to ‘Backward.’”

    • DaveH

      Flashman says — “Surely it wasn’t written to be taken seriously”.
      Surely you don’t think you have any credibility on this board, Flashman?
      For some reason, when I see your comments, the word Deet comes to mind.

  • Sharron

    Sadly, our once beloved nation is totally in the hands of the communists.

    • sesame

      So where is the government ownership of the means of production? Last I looked, all of small business and major manufacturer’s are still in private hands

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        First of all, they’re getting ready to confiscate all private property. The laws are in place. They’re just waiting til the time is right. Second of all, they’re already exerting control over all private and public corporations. They just haven’t declared ownership yet. Between the taxes, the laws governing corporations and the EPA regulations, who do you think controls them? Hell, they’re even regulating garage sales and farmer’s markets. They’ve already taken control. People just don’t realize it yet. They have allowed us the illusion of being in control of our own lives and businesses. Time to wake up! They’ve declared war on us and most people don’t even recognize it.

      • Patriot1776

        GM, the banks, I would say all of the green energy companies, but most of them have already gone bankrupt,…

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        sesame, the words “private ownership of a business” in this country is a smokescreen saying to avoid the painful truth: nobody owns what they don’t control. All businesses in this country are regulated by the criminal government who can come and seize so called “private property” for failure to pay the rent(taxes) or when a business fails to comply to the criminal governments standards it can exact punitive fines which by the way the poor consumer ends up paying. The criminal government laughs all the way to it’s central bank. This goes along with the other smoke screen issue of “private ownership of the land” as the criminal governments can kick you off of it if you any time you fail to pay it’s rent(taxes). Wake up.

      • Marty S.

        Al Capone could only have wished his schemes worked as well as the government of today.

  • http://stoshwolfen.wordpress.com Stoshwolfen

    Like the article and agree with most of it. Unfortunate that the left has managed to make the right look the same as they, at least in rhetoric if not action. So, I wonder is it effective to tell the truth so openly when the lexicon of political speech has become such a perfect example of DoubleSpeak? Have our people succumbed to the psychology of DoubleThink to the point that talk is no longer working?

  • Carol

    Obama should go down in history as the first man without a brain who ‘controlled’ a free country. He isn’t as intelligent as everyone thinks he is. He’s been brainwashed by communists since he was a child and his intelligence comes from reading teleprompters.

    His yelling ‘hope and change’ didn’t work, so now he’s quietly saying ‘Forward.’, with a period. He needs a gray-matter-ectomy to remove the Marxist debris that’s spinning inside his empty skull, or either clogging the left and right sides of his pea-sized brain. I agree with Jon Lovitz – he’s a pathelogical liar and a f’!&%ing a$$hole

  • Dwight Mann

    Øbamanus thinks he will win. He might steal the election again, but that would only incite irate Americans to revolt. Go live in a real communist country and then stay there, punk. . .

    • Dwight Mann

      OOoooooopppsss! ! !
      I forgot to add this
      Ron Paul in 2012

    • sesame

      He didn’t “steal” it the last time. So he can’t steal it “again”

      • Patriot1776

        No, all of those dead people really did vote for him, also those people who liked him so much they voted 2 or 3 times. But of course obama wasn’t aware of any voter fraud going on, he had no part in it. It was never posted on his teleprompter.

        Of course it is easy to see how a junior senator from Illinois could so easily overtake Hillary, it’s not like she was that well known or popular with the demecrats…

  • Tom Cook

    Sadly, the average American is almost functionally illiterate–and yes that includes about fifty percent of so-called college graduates who majored in black studies or women’s studies or journalism. He doesn’t know socialism from a Mandrill’s ass. He identifies with Simon Colwell, not Thomas Sowell or Ben Crystal or anyone else of intellectual stature which is beyond him. He is more interested in freebies than freedom. He is a sheep. He is just like the two-thirds of the “American” population which did not risk anything in our Revolution while the other third risked all. He is prime fodder for the obongo pack.

    • Scott in SC

      Mr. Cook,
      Just how do you equate a degree in journalism with one in womens or minority studies?

  • WillytheGeek

    It’s mispelled, It should read FROWARD, Look it up if you have to.

    • woodman

      ro·ward
      adj \ˈfrō-(w)ərd\
      Definition of FROWARD
      1
      : habitually disposed to disobedience and opposition
      2
      archaic : adverse
      — fro·ward·ly adverb
      — fro·ward·ness noun
      See froward defined for kids »
      Examples of FROWARD

      Origin of FROWARD
      Middle English, turned away, froward, from fro from + -ward -ward
      First Known Use: 13th century
      Related to FROWARD
      Synonyms: bad, contrary, errant, naughty, misbehaving, mischievous
      Antonyms: behaved, behaving, nice, orderly
      [+]more
      Learn More About FROWARD
      Thesaurus: All synonyms and antonyms for “froward”
      Browse
      Next Word in the Dictionary: frower
      Previous Word in the Dictionary: frow
      All Words Near: froward
      Seen & Heard

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        woodman, what dictionary did you use? My Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary has some of the elements of what your definition has but not to the degree of yours. Years ago I came across a dictionary that was at least eight inches thick and over a hundred years old. I offered to buy it but the person wouldn’t part with it for any amount of money. There were things in it that don’t appear in modern dictionaries. Its almost as if the meanings from the past are edited out along with including slight mutations in the meanings to more directly relate to the modern understanding of many of the words we use today. I believe it’s to misdirect the masses. Most people feel that if the colleges can’t teach us the right way what chance do we have? I got that dictionary (Webster’s Collegiate) when I went college as that’s what they recommended. Etymology is important to understanding the past and the present.

  • kategray

    The PRETENDER has been showing his stripes and the AMERICIAN public is seeing it and do not like the results. There are more of us and the telling will be at the polls,(if not rigged). Remember that the auto poll booths are maintained by UNIONS. rEMEMBER WHEN reid WON BUT if you hit for someone else it went to reid.

    • kay

      2012 votes are to be counted by a spanish company called SCYTL with no tangible ballots for count verification. The owner of SCYTL has a past connection to Obama. This has to be addressed and changed or we’ll surely have another stolen election.

      • Windrinker

        Who made the decision to hire a company in Spain to count votes for our presidential election…isn’t this against the law. Why isn’t it being addressed by the News media. Most people haven’t a clue this is the plan. They are still talking like there is going to be a legitimate election.

        There is no need to bother voting when the votes are being counted by the socialist country of Spain.. with its ties to obama. The election is already in the bag. We, as Americans, should proceed accordingly.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        I agree with you, Kay. Why do you think he’s so emboldened? I’ll go one step further. I don’t think any of them care who wins or loses. Either way, “they” go “forward”. They win, we lose. The whole voting process is a joke to them since they own the whole package.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Kay, that’s why we need to return to how presidents were elected to begin with.

  • cawmun cents

    Everything the Grayman does is about Democratic Socialism.
    That way any thing that could be construed as black and/or white,can work either way going FORWARD! for him.Confusion is his stock and trade.Illusion is where his money is made.The gray-area between his ears is only superceded by the gray-area in the minds of his supporters.
    It might mean this but it could mean that.FORWARD!
    People accuse him of being vague,but what he really is isnt exactly clear.
    He could be this,but he might be that.FORWARD!
    He could be Christian,but he might be Muslim.FORWARD!
    He might be a moderate,but he could be a radical.FORWARD!
    He might be a natural-born,but he could be a foreign-born.(can anyone with half a mind see where this is going?If you can then please respond and inform me.)
    He could be a capitalist,but he might be a socialist.
    He might be here to help us,but he could be here to kill us.
    He could be being transparent,but he might have some hidden agendas and gray areas.

    Notice how the democrats made absolutely sure that the opposition was exactly the same,so that no one could use this conundrum as ammunition against Obama?
    If the opposition is a flip-flopper,then we can put that on him and it wont even reflect on us,they think.Yeah….(said Lovitz,”thats the ticket”)

    Meanwhile back at the homefront,there was indecision and a cloud of doubt in the air.
    “Why,since that is what we have had for four years now,why dont we just keep things this way…..what possible harm could it be?”,thought the populace,using their gray-area matter to ponder with.”We arent really any worse off than Bush left us,right?”,they pontificated from the line at the supermarket,while searching for their foodstamps.
    Those trying to run small businesses just looked at them with contempt,and kept right on wading through the multitudes of bureaucrats that were standing in their way.The company store was becoming a place where everyone did their shopping,just like that place on the other side of the globe,where democratic socialism had folks living in the factory attic.
    “But dont worry folks”,the Grayman said as he watched the teleprompter defecating the words which he was told to say to them.”your standard of living has to suffer,so that the world can be more equal.Only then,by being just like them,living in the factory attic,happy as flies on scat,can you really succeed as a Democratic Socialist.”
    The populace screamed,”FORWARD!”and all slapped each other high-fives as the union bosses walked among them,to ensure that there was no deviation from the party lines.

    What could be,and what night be,suddenly didnt seem like such a gray-area anymore.
    We’re living in 1984.
    Cheers!
    -CC.

    • BGinTN

      CC, sir,

      Please read Bill Warner’s work.

      http://www.politicalislam.com/

      Your answer to your Grayman is there.

      Read, study and compare to the 0.
      It fits like a glove.
      This Kafir (their term for me) can see it.
      Please pay attention to the Dualism and the fact that Islam is Communistic with a Religious face.

      • Sirian

        BGinTn,
        Very good article. The Five Principles are also very important for people to understand. But stand by, there will more than likely be plenty of backlash – is it not commonplace any more?

      • BGinTN

        Sirian,
        No reply button on your post so,
        Back-Lash? Bring it on!
        Really study Dr, Bill Warner’s work.

        It totally fits 0 and his actions and plans.
        As well as the UN with all of its Communist and Islamic’s in control.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        BGinTN, the fourth principal, dualism, is nothing more than the same “double think” that progressives so successfully use to keep themselves believing a lie. The way of Islam is hatred and murder and what the poor dopes don’t address: what happens when there is no one left to hate or murder? They’ll have to turn against each other, but that is as it should be:

        Gen 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
        Gen 16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

        Looks to me like they are living up to this prophecy.

      • BGinTN

        Katrael,
        The Dualism is much more than that.
        Islamic ethics are dualistic, one code for believers, another for kafirs.
        Duality is the only way to sustain slavery, and it has for 1400 years.
        Islam’s duality manifest in hoe women must submit to men.
        Women are spiritually and inferior to men and it takes the testimony of two women to equal one man.

        I can go on and on but, read Dr, Bill Warner’s work and check the references in them

        It is one of the foundations to understanding Islam and it’s contradiction.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        BGinTN, though I haven’t had a chance to do an in-depth study of Islam, I believe what you say is correct about the dual nature of it and how I still don’t fully comprehend. I have known this for a long time: That one of the goals of Islam is to eliminate or convert people to Islam until there is no other belief system left and that they will use any means to accomplish this end. A wiser man than I once said, “A person convinced against his will is of the same opiniion still.” This is why they will never be successful.

    • Malachi

      So what do we do to remedy this B/s

      • BGinTN

        Education can be a good thing, let others know.
        Use the knowledge of Islam and what it is to stand up to it.
        Recognize it when you see it in action and put sunlight on it.
        By the way, Islam is not one book the Koran. but three the Sira and Hadith as well.

      • Sirian

        Study up Malachi, study up. What BiGnTN posted is one of many very good sources of information.

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      CC, he’s a puppet. Born and raised for the job. Kind of reminds me of the story of “Rosemary’s Baby”.

  • Sirian

    With Bernie Sanders founding the CPC in ’91 what more evidence is needed to prove that Socialism is the first stepping stone to Communism? This is something that too many people do not fully understand. A dumbed down population is so much more easily influenced – COWS – than anything else. “Forward” is the true moniker of communists and has been used by them time and time again. Obummer chuckles under his breath at the fools that don’t understand. Wake up folks, what you may have been taught to believe to be so much better is as far from the truth as my moniker is from our solar system! :(

    • Warrior

      How about “forewarned”!

      • Sirian

        Most definitely Warrior, most definitely!!

      • Marty S.

        More like bend over forward and spare the lube.

    • Mirage

      I understand you Simian …. as opposed to what the RIGHT PROMISES: BACKWARD.
      Obama sucks, but I’ll take his brand of Capitalism with social safety nets; over the Right’s continued support of Oligarchy.
      Go OWS!

      • Sirian

        “Mirage” – yes, a very good description of the state of your mind.

      • MikeEV

        Just how many of those social safety nets are you benefitting from at the expense of us backward thinking conservatives?

      • Michael J.

        Mirage,
        From Wikipedia:
        “Oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people could be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, corporate, or military control. Such states are often controlled by a few prominent families who pass their influence from one generation to the next”.
        At this time, no matter which boob is planted in the oval office, the oligarchs rule the roost. Take off the left-right blinders to reveal what’s behind the mirage.

      • Liz

        I see the dummying down of America has worked well on you. Idioocracy in progress, I call it.
        Please take the blinders off before it’s too late.

      • 2WarAbnVet

        Unfortunately for our nation, “his brand of Capitalism” is no capitalism but Marxism.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Mirage, read what Michael J said. Then do some research on your own. Use the Internet while you still can. It will soon be so censored that you won’t be able to find the truth.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        MikeEV, I noticed one thing about this site: the people who are most vocally progressive(communist) will never answer a question let alone a good one. The only thing they seem willing to do is to continue to vocalize but, most of the time they just shut up when they know they’ve been bested. What else can they do? They can continue the same lame outcries or they have to shut up. You won’t get an honest answer from Mirage about how much dope (entitlements) he/she gets from the good old dope dealer in order to keep him/her holding the progressive (communist) line. In fact he she doesn’t even care about anything but the next fix and that everyone else should pay for it.

      • JeffH

        Katrael, you’re absolutley correct in that the progressive/Marxist/socialist/communists seem to respond to questions by always ask questions but never answer them directly and start their responses with “So what you’re saying is—?” or Bush-Cheney-GOP-Republicans-T’baggers-conservatives, etc, etc________________________________

        “Social chaos is the GOAL for the transformational Marxist. The crisis of crime and disorder is the door for the … facilitator/change agent to enter the community and to initiate the paradigm shift! Even though these social architects plainly admit what is most vital in making for a crime free community, they have absolutely no intention of restoring ‘individual conscience’ or going back to repairing the traditional family. On the contrary, for the past sixty years these socio-psychologists have been introducing these very dialectic concepts into our school system with the intent of demolishing personal conscience….”:

        Obama’s “Universal” Service Plan – Training a Socialist Army of World Servers
        http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

        Obama is a “modern Marxist” community organizer…camouflage is his key and his plan to change America is radically different.

        Aimed at socialist change, it would raise “religious” boundaries, limit free speech, and ban divisive truths. It must be tolerant of today’s amoral values and militantly intolerant toward traditional values. And — like the tactics outlined in Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” — it would use deception and “agitation” to create conflict, and the Hegelian/Marxist dialectic process to manipulate minds and establish the planned solidarity.

        The transforming power of “SERVICE LEARNING”

        “Service learning” isn’t a new phenomenon. It has been well tested by U.S. educators for more than a decade. What’s new is the scale of Obama’s plan. His massive system would press students and citizens of all ages in a revolutionary government-led program to change the way we think and relate to each other. A more descriptive term would be mass brainwashing!

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        JeffH, I went to the link and read the information there and it seems like I can see how these techniques are used against us. Most people are clueless as to how they are being manipulated. It’s all a gradual infiltration of wolves in sheep’s clothing that is accomplished over many decades which utilizes the things that the people are dissatisfied with to pull them in. Genius. There is one other thing: “hold out your hand…now close your eyes and pray to god for candy. Now open your eyes. (of course there is an empty hand). Then the organizer puts a piece of candy in the hand, “the state can give you what you need.” Something along this line.

      • JeffH

        Katrael, I think it is important to understand where Obama has come from, who his mentors were, and his background as a “commuity organizer”. Alinsky’s teaching were a major influence on Obama and I believe helped give him direction in life. Obama is a purely radical thinker that has studied and embraced the Alinsky teaching.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        JeffH, he apparently learned his lessons well. It seems the only way to fight this is through education. But, Alinsky knew this educational process was a slow one. Do we have time to educate enough people before the S hits the F?

      • JeffH

        Adding to that, it is very important to understand “the enemy” Marxism/socialism/progressivism/communism and to understand Alinsky is to understand the tools being used to transform our Constitutional Republic directly into a “new age” hybrid communist state.

        I don’t know if you are aware that Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis about Alinsky and his radical ideals. She actually worked with him.

        Here’s another link you may find interesting:

        How Obama “Alinskyed” Voters (update 1)
        http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2009/01/how-obama-alinskyed-voters.html

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        I knew Hilary studied Alinsky but I didn’t know that she did so directly nor did I realize just what Alinsky’s teaching really were. I’m learning though. I’ll check out your information.

      • DaveH

        Katrael says — “Genius”.
        No, Katrael. Taking advantage of peoples’ ignorance and lust for easy money is not Genius. It’s a lack of morality.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Well, maybe I should have said: evil genius?

  • anonymous

    the communist party usa endorses obama

    • eddie47d

      The KKK begrudgingly endorses Romney since Gingrich dropped out. So does that mean that all supporters of Romney or Gingrich are Klan supporters?

    • Wyatt

      The Communist Party has been running this country in one way or another since Joe McCarthy left office . They just remained low key and steadily infiltraited the liberal party .Democrats have long been a extremely liberal group , the tax and spend big government group , so it was quite easy for them to get a foothold . And with educators who teach communist docturne and glorify it as an ideal form of government while ignoring its short comings what can we expect ?
      If any one had really paid attention to what was being said in the last election , they would have known they were electing a Communist . All one need have done was to read this clowns book and they would have seen it . Both parents were communists , Those he admired were communists . And now he is acting like a tolitarian dictator of the communist mold . A total distain for our Constitution should be a dead give away . He has already set into place the means to suspend any elective process should he decide or he feels he might lose . And he has his back up plan outsoursing the vote count to a company in Spain that is owner by his backer George Soros .
      Wake up and look around America , We are about to face the biggest challange we have ever known , and if we don’t combat it we will lose our freedom

    • David169

      I would like someone to explain to me why anyone would consider communism as a viable form of government. It has been tried since at least 400BC and has never worked. For communism to work too many people are needed to administer to too few workers. Our country is failing under Obama’s watch due to excessive spending. I’ve heard this is because he subscribes to the Cloward-Piven plan to overload our system of government with debt by entitlements to make it collapse. Presently we have 50% of the people in the US receiving some type of entitlement. If he succeeds in collapsing capitalism how does he figure communism will support the entitlement monster that has been created. The last round of communist takeovers failed in countries where individuals had a strong work ethic. Entitlements have destroyed a lot of the American work ethic so any communistic government here will fail quickly. China is the last remaining communist government and it survives only because it went to a capitalist free market economy. None of what is going on now makes any sense.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        David169, people accept communism because they want to continue those entitlements you mentioned. As far as the government dealing with the entitlement monster: they’re not worried about it or the people who will finally lose out when the government can no longer feed the addiction. The people in charge only know one thing: six and a half billion people will have to die off in a short time in order to reduce the world population to five hundred million (which is the magic number they feel this planet can actually support).

      • eddie47d

        Most entitlements are earned such as SS,Veterans benefits,government pensions and so forth. Welfare,food stamps are mostly a state issue so please be more specific in lumping everything together.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        eddie47d, look up the word “entitlement” and you’d see that those things you listed, even the ones earned, are entitlements.

      • eddie47d

        You are going overboard in pettiness. Not only that there is no plan to exterminate 6 billion people that some of you right wing goofballs are falsely spreading. Now I didn’t say there wouldn’t be wars but even then it wouldn’t annihilate that many. I belong to a group that wants to stabilize the world’s population and they have never advocated any diliberate killing of anyone.

      • Joe Brooks

        Here is a very interesting clip from “The Soviet Story”. George Bernard Shaw, a Communist and co founder of the London School of Economics which Von Hayek spent most of his career teaching at, speaks about Socialism and his advocacy of mass murder.

        Wake up people, free trade was promoted by Marx and the Fabian Communists. The policy of free trade leads to the colonization of non Communist countries, by looting the middle class and then the purchasing of that countries’ assets. Any politician that supports free trade is out to destroy the USA and allow Red China to buy our country.

        The Reds are buying us a fantastic pace.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvsf2MUKRQ&feature=topics

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        eddie47d, who’s being petty? You think that some of us just imagined that there isn’t a desire by some to reduce the population of this planet? Check this out:

        http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=monument+at+elber+georgia&qpvt=monument+at+elber+georgia&FORM=IGRE

        Somebody went to a great expense to make this monument. Just thought you’d like to know that not all of us are dreaming things up on our own.

    • Flashy

      Care to share a link showing the Communist party endorses President Obama? If you are referring to a member of the Communist party endorsing President Obama, and then saying it applies to the entire party or that pres. obama holds the same beliefs as the Communist Party…before making such a claim…perhaps you’d best check out who endorses Ron Paul…and should the same reasoning apply ?

  • DaveH

    “Only 50 percent polled view capitalism in positive terms”. That’s because we haven’t had anything close to Capitalism for a very long time, and the people are confusing the Government controlled markets with Capitalism (Free Markets). The Leaders and their Political Cronies can’t achieve their Power and Perks at the expense of the citizens with Free Markets, so they’ve successfully dumbed-down the populace and blamed their weak economies on the opposite of what is really causing them — that is budding Socialism.

    • http://personalliberty.com Jake

      Just look at the public school system. Dumbing down to the lowest common denominator. Check out the school books – rewriting of history. An educated populace will stand its ground. An uneducated populace will roll over and fall in line.

      • JOSEPH FOSTER

        I agree our education is failing I wish others will stop blaming one party;
        Stop blaming Democrats both parties have failed America, both parties are to be blamed for the massive deficit. One party starts two wars by using the US credit card. Both parties are mired in failure. Our trade policy favors the hiring of Chinese workers and not Americans. Did you know if America becomes De Industrialize it will in time have an unemployment rate of 20% or more. Greece which is not a major Industrial country currently has unemployment rate of 20% When America unemployment reaches 30% the USA may become a communist country created by a revolution. A true conservative works for the interest of his or her country and not for the interest of other countries. The American conservative party has lost touch as to the major problems the country is presently facing.

      • jopa

        Jake: That’s exactly what Mitt Romney is saying why don’t you send your kids to Prep school, Harvard and Yale like his father did for him?

    • http://northwoodsmomblog.blogspot.com/ Tanya

      I’m 42 and I don’t think I’ve seen real capitalism operating in my lifetime, now that I know what true capitalism is. It’s no wonder more and more people see it as a negative thing. They’ve never witnessed the free market.

      • Firefly

        Dave, Jake, Tanya, I agree with you all. I can’t tell you more than I know but the fall elections will be the most important of our lifetime. Never before have we had over 70 members of Congress who were openly socialist and a president who was pro-socialist, pro-Muslim, anti-Biblical (Jewish and Christian), and who, together with a compliant Federal Reserve Bank is creating the conditions to destroy the value of the dollar by making debt so large it could never be paid with anything but huge inflation. I don’t know all the answers. Only a return to the God given values of our founders who believed in the Creator of all that is and a return to the Biblical foundations of our nation can we ‘save’ the United States.

        What I would also suggest is that all reading this, plan on a tripling of prices in the months and years ahead, not in houses, or even in gold and silver (although anything is possible) but in the things you really need, food, water, clothes. Shop sales for food storage (companies like Emergency Essentials, Karst Sports and Honeyvillegrain.com that provide non-perishable freeze dried foods that last for decades). A hobby of growing some of your own will one day be a blessing. Small town America where you know and are known will be better than any large city and some large cities will be far worse than others.

        I don’t know how much time we have. I and others are amazed that we have gotten this far in no worse shape than we are in but our train is flying down the mountain, and it appears that the brakes are in very poor condition. Our debt is out of control and we can’t even pay the interest on it without borrowing more. If the government taxes everyone who earns over 50,000 a year, 95% and cuts social security by 10% and medicare by 20%, we still would not get past the next decade without being in worse shape than we are now, and the big inflation has hardly begun. Millions of Americans have left the USA in the past decade and since the Democrats took over Congress in 2006 that number is increasing. However, since almost all nations are doing the same as we are, trying to print their way out of debt without cutting their spending, running is not likely to help you in the long run.

        If you are fortunate enough to have a relationship with God, nurture it, as He alone will be able to guide you through the coming years. God is no respecter of persons and all who seek His ways and His heart will have a hearing. You cannot do anything to make Him love you more than He already does. You can only draw closer to Him, obey the ten commandments, and the simple rules that Jesus taught, and learn of Him. There is no denomination that has an edge on Him but there is evil in the world and like good, it is growing. A final confrontation is coming but none reading this are likely to be alive when it finally arrives, however it will be hell on earth before that time, as good and evil duke it out.

        If you are already a believer, than pray like you have never prayed before, that God’s will be done in all the land, in the elections, state and national, in the unions, in the supreme court, in everything. Short of that you are not going to like the future regardless of who runs or rules the country. May God bless all who read this.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Tanya, Firefly. we are definitely looking at the end of an age and the beginning of a new one. My question is: what kind of a new age are we getting?

      • http://northwoodsmomblog.blogspot.com/ Tanya

        Firefly, I appreciate your comments. I am a believer, and I agree with you that nurturing a relationship with God is key. I am concerned, though, that many believers are so concerned with the next election and have such a desire to “save” the nation (and possibly so much fear of the future) that they are willing to compromise what they know to be truth for “the lesser of two evils”. I saw it in the last presidential election and I’m seeing it again this time. I don’t believe voting or even the founding fathers’ example is the answer. For me, obedience to YHWH and the principals he has instructed me to live by is much more important than what happens politically.

        With that said, I know what you mean about the uncertain times we’re living in. My family has already experienced the combination of a lower income and rising food and gas prices. We have a low income with a family of nine and we don’t participate in government programs, so it is definitely a test of faith. We are seeking ways to be more self-sufficient and live on less, and we are thankful that we live in a small rural town where we have a strong support system of friends and neighbors.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Tanya, I’m glad to see you using a good transliterated version of our creator’s true name. Thank you.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1556451159 Rand Allan

        @Tanya, I’m 59 and I DO remember what a semblance of capitalism is like (1913 marks the time that Progressives took over and established market-destroying actions). My parents were upper-poverty/low middle class when I was young. Only my Dad worked, yet we had a home, health insurance, and never wanted for anything. Regulations were non-existant compared to now, yet the world was not a cess-pool of crime, injury, inferior products, and entire segments of society falling between the cracks. We had private organizations to certify professions and the safety of products, and if people lost their jobs there were always churches and other organizations around to help care for the indigent. Prices were stable because we were still on a semblance of a gold standard. Inflation didn’t destroy our savings until Nixon took us off the gold standard (curse his soul). Regulation of every aspect of our lives and an obsession with safety at any cost hadn’t reared its ugly head yet, so prices were low (25 cents per gallon for gas) and anybody could still start up a new business with a minimum of cost. It’s the old-timers like me who really resent what’s happened to the country because we can still remember a time when govt wasn’t completely out of control and the general population still valued hard work and personal responsibility for one’s actions

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Rand Allan, I’m only a little older than you and I can also remember those things that you speak about. Now this will be a sore point for progressives and truly the older generations will remember this: no work no eat. Even during the so called great depression people would travel around and be willing to work for just a meal. Now we guarantee that it doesn’t matter what you do you will be able to eat. It would seem to me that no country can remain strong where the population feels that it is entitled to the wealth of others though they themselves didn’t work for it. That this country has come to believe that it can afford for physically capable people to sit on their (censored) and do nothing and receive an income for doing that is asinine. I’d be willing to bet that there is a cosmic law, one other than that found in the bible, that says this.

    • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

      DaveH, since this progressive movement has been in the works since the 1800′s and many people have grown up under its indoctrination, most notably withing the public school system, what do you think it would take to reverse the mindset of a complacent, daydreaming electorate to accept a real true to life capitalistic system? But, another question comes to mind: why if 50 percent of the people view capitalism positively will the public willingly accept what Obama is doing? Is it that they don’t see Obama as a socialist/communist?

      • DaveH

        The Welfare State has got nearly half the population entranced, and the Military State has got most of the rest entranced. The Leaders will do whatever it takes to keep their Power and Perks.
        Will the people awaken from their hypnotic states, or will they just keep slumbering until the economy and our Freedom have completely gone by the wayside? Only time will tell.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom