Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

Federal Reserve Corruption Coming To Light

April 20, 2012 by  

Federal Reserve Corruption Coming To Light

Despite stonewalling by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his cronies in the moneyed institutions of privilege, the recent partial Fed audit and dribbled-out documents sought by news organizations under the Freedom of Information Act are revealing an astounding level of corruption in the institution.

There is a revolving door between the Fed boards and the “too-big-to-fail” financial institutions like Citibank, Bank of America, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, etc. This, of course, we knew. What we didn’t know — but suspected — was the speed at which the door revolved.

At the time we were being warned by President George W. Bush and former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson (formerly of Goldman Sachs) that something had to be done to save the large financial institutions that were teetering on the brink of bankruptcy because of their own debauchery, there were 18 Federal Reserve Board members who were previously high-level executives of the “too big to fails” that were in line to receive the bailouts, according to a GAO report. And 76 percent of Fed board members also own or owned stock in those same institutions.

After spending time on the Fed board and determining whether those financial institutions lived or died and acquiring insider information available only to Fed board members, those members then return to the banks as executives who set the future policy for those banks. Now, according to Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the top six financial entities have assets the equivalent of 65 percent of the United States gross domestic product.

Those entities spend billions of dollars to lobby Congress and finance Congressional campaigns and buy Presidents (they own both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney).

While laws in Europe and Australia prevent their central bank board members from similar conflicts of interest, there are no such laws regulating Federal Reserve board members.

The Federal Reserve is a criminal enterprise that is looting the savings and investments of Americans for the benefit of a privileged elite class. Very few people understand this, even though I and others have been saying it for many years, enduring ridicule and disdain all the while. But thanks to the efforts of people like Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul in Congress, and a very few diligent reporters like Dylan Ratigan, the truth is getting into the mainstream for all to see.

Editor’s note: It’s time to make your submissions for this month’s You Sound Off! feature, which will run April 25. Get your submission in by April 23. It should be no more than 750 words (if they are longer, we probably won’t read them). We will select the one or two we think are the best of the week to publish. We reserve the right to edit for grammar and style but will try not to alter the meaning.

Send your submissions to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com. Please include your name, address and telephone number (only your name will be published) so we can contact you if we need to clarify something. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.–BL

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American who has been writing a newsletter since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Federal Reserve Corruption Coming To Light”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Dave

    France invented the guillotine to deal with the Aristocrats.

  • Dave

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEZfMruLMSI&feature=relmfu

    If you want to know about the FED and learn how you are being ripped off watch this history of the FED

  • Nancy in Nebraska

    I am absolutely FOR doing away with the fed. I’ve been doing a lot of reading on what they are and what they do. Here’s my question; at this point in time, how would we replace the fed? Our government no longer has enough gold to go back to a gold backed currency. We are so far in debt and continue to accrue debt at a rate that is astounding. The dollar is very close to losing it’s status as the international monetary unit. Many countries are already trading in currencies other than the dollar. So right now, how could we do away with the fed and what kind of currency should be put into place? Anybody have any ideas on solutions?

    • Nancy in Nebraska

      What?!? No ideas? Me neither. So where do we go from here?

    • DaveH

      Sure we do, Nancy. We could have a real gold standard like used to be common before the Bankers and Government caught on to the easy way to fleece the citizens with fiat money. The new dollar (or whatever they want to call it) would be declared as being worth X grains of gold (1 grain of gold is currently worth about $3.75). Then with that as a standard, for small transactions silver could be used with an exchange rate (e.g. 50 to 1) set maybe once a week or month or year. Then the merchants could accept weight denominated silver coins with known current exchange rates. With the computer technology we have now, it would be a snap for them to convert from the new dollars to how many ounces of silver you would need to pay your bill if you had silver coins. The same would be true for the lesser valuable metals which the consumers and merchants could work out between them as to what they would accept as money.
      People could also put their gold in warehouses (banks) that they trusted, and trade notes from trustworthy banks giving the holders the right to redeem them for Gold. Only, those banks would be guilty of Fraud and appropriately punished if they fraudulently issued more notes than they had Gold to back them up.

      • Nancy in Nebraska

        Ahhh but, we don’t have the gold to do it. We (the government) have divested ourselves of our gold. We can’t get the gold because we are broke!

      • DaveH

        Since when did being broke stop the Government from spending? Besides, the Government shouldn’t even be involved, other than declaring the ratio of Gold to the new dollar.
        Banks would become what they should be — warehouses for real money with real value. And as I said they could issue paper money for convenience, but it would have to be fully backed with their vaulted assets, for anybody that wanted to redeem their paper notes. But the banks wouldn’t be limited to holding Gold. They could choose to hold other precious metals in addition to Gold, which considering their volatility might be a little riskier than Gold, but it would certainly be much less risky than paper money (which can be printed at will by the Federal Reserve) and the Fractional Banking System.
        Whatever course the Banks choose, they should be held to the same Fraud rules as any other business. If they tell their customers, for instance, that their notes are exchangeable for Gold, then they better damn well be.
        The new dollar would be denominated in Gold, but that would not preclude people from using other precious metals as money, they just would be subject to market forces and their values relative to the gold dollar would fluctuate somewhat.
        Read this book, Nancy, and I think you will get a clearer picture of what I’m talking about:
        http://mises.org/books/whathasgovernmentdone.pdf

    • Meteorlady

      Some states have passed laws and have their own currency right now. Another way is to end the “guaranteed” loans to banks that have bad business practices. I’m tired of bailing these guys out and I believe it’s a scam of monumental proportions. Research the Savings & Loan bailouts of the 1980′s – this is it again only this time they took us to the brink and are using our money (devaluation/inflation) to get the economy back so they can build it up and do it again.

  • Rafael

    An article by Frank Shostak concluded that, “contrary to Bernanke, his loose policies didn’t save the US economy from a depression but have instead damaged the process of real wealth generation.
    Bernanke’s loose policies have provided support to bubble activities, thereby destabilizing the economy. So in this sense his policies have saved the bubbles, thus undermining wealth generators.
    This runs the risk that at some stage the United States could end up having a stagnating or worse, declining, pool of real savings.
    Over a prolonged period of time the policies of these countries (an ever-growing government and central-bank involvement in the economy) have severely damaged the heart of economic growth — the pool of real savings.”

    • Meteorlady

      Next bubble – college loans. Stay tuned…. once again we will be asked to bail out those that borrowed irresponsibly…..

      Then the US dollar will be unseated as the world reserve currency and it will plunge. We are truly slave to the world banking elites.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        There are two guilty parties in the Student Loan Debacle: Lenders and Borrowers. Now, since the good ole boys aint getting their money back then maybe it is time to forgive the ones that they’ll never see a nickle from and then make it where they can’t secure debt until they somehow display credit worthiness. We used to have such a thing as bankruptcies to relieve the strain so that a person could get their life back on track. Why is it the Fed is the only corporate entity that a person or even another corporation can’t go bankrupt against?

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        The US Dollar is going to fall as the world’s reserve currency and that is just a matter of time. I hate it but it’s true.

  • Armyblue

    “no means of calling our miss-managers to account.” We are basically slaves in this country, and too far in debt to change things.

    • Windrinker

      Armyblue, it is NEVER too late! As long as there is a breath left in freedom loving Americans, there will be those seeking God given rights and individual freedom.. That huge debt needn’t stand in the way…of securing this country IF Americans want to do it.(instead of waiting for someone else to come along and do it for them.)

  • jake

    if anyone really wants to clean up the federal reserve and the corruption that has been hidden since 1913, put ron paul in charge.

    • Meteorlady

      I totally agree and that is why the mainstream media tries to ignore him or make him out as either a nutcase activist or a far right crazy. He is in fact probably one of the last great, truly great, representative and statesman we will ever see.

      The only person who has stood fast and told the truth. Too bad people can’t comprehend what’s coming.

  • http://twitter.com/lucitee4 Luci Tomlin (@lucitee4)

    Despite what a LOT of people BELIEVE, the FEDERAL RESERVE is NOT a Government ENTITY! The ONLY ones they answer to is the WORLD BANKS! And WHO “OWNS” the
    Worlds BANKS and has UNQUESTIONED, NON-TRANSPARENT, and TOTAL CONTROL? The OIL RICH, MULTI-BILLIONAIRE Barons in the radical, rebel, MIDDLE Eastern Countries! Their citizens have NO say in what happens to them, but are used like SLAVES! Ruled by DICTATORS and THEIR LAWS! What is their most useful(To THEM)CREATION? YOU DECIDE! Do WE want to be OWNED by these Dictators? Do we REALLY want to be “taken over” by a foreign force that ONLY WANTS our wealth, resources, assets, property and our FREEDOM! And another four years of THIS present occupant in our White House, and we WILL BE! PREPARE for it! November, “DECIDE” to VOTE CONSERVATIVE THIS time and send their CREATION back HOME! Conservatives WILL, but we NEED the votes of the Conservative DEMOCRATS and INDEPENDENTS as WELL! Help save our beloved Country!

  • Steve E

    The best thing for any individual to do is to stock up on gold and silver. No one knows exactly when the monetary crash will come, but it will come suddenly. Those that have precious metals will be king and will be able to trade for goods without buying a wheel barrel to carry their cash. Also, keep your precious metals hidden so the government cannot confiscate it.

  • sesame

    Why the surprise? The Fed was set up to protect the banks at time of economic disaster. It just did what it was designed to do. As for the movement of personnel between the Fed and the Banks, such movements are true of all branches of government, starting well before Eisenhower warned. about the Military-Industrial complex That was just the first of these arrangements that the public knew about. Of course now, we have the Military, Industrial and Academia Complex. The careers of all the top people involve experience in at least two of these organizations. Oh. and don’t forget Big Pharma, the FDA, and the American Medical Association. And where do retiring Senators go? They become lobbyists for the Big corporations or work on legislation and politics in the Think Tanks. Where have you all been? Welcome to The Establishment!

    • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

      Dear sesame,

      No surprise here. I’ve writing these things since 1969.

      Best wishes,
      Bob

      • http://twitter.com/lucitee4 Luci Tomlin (@lucitee4)

        THANK YOU, Bob! Like you said, most Conservatives saw the ineptitude of this interloper from the START! I grew up in the Church and was often the “victim” of a backwoods country hot-head posing as a Minister! HIGH on moonshine and his ego, he could preach a “serman” non-stop for hours! Since CHURCH was the entertainment center, these loud, divisive, condemning and brow-beaters had the sainted women rolling in the aisles in ecstacy! This was the ONLY time they were allowed to “express” themselves without being repremanded by their husbands! 0′Bama kinda, but not QUITE, makes me homesick
        for the good ole’ days and memories of hot summers, tent revivals with sawdust floors and FLIES!

  • don

    ron paul would have to watch his but if he made president. i read somewhere that john kennedy wanted to shut down the federal reserve. i have a feeling that the big boys with all the power were behind his killing. they say it was communists, mob, and i’m sure they came up with a few more suspected groups. we all know johnson had ties to big money by expanding the veit nam war and a lot of companies building huge wealth supplying the war with war materials. who knows some of these jackals would probly try to snuff ron paul. right now they are silencing him. with all the glorifying of chosen candidates in the elections the elects are made into something like beauty padgents. voters fall for it. i.ve been paying a lot of attention to politics since the “92″ elections when the only choice we had was the same thing in clinton and bush,the same type of candidites we have in this election. i woke up after that. all owned by big banks, big business and big money. i don’t think people don’t realize the vote can beat big money. people think that what we have now will never change and we’re stuck with everything that happens in the present. get rid of the wealth generated beauty padgent elections and vote. the only wealth backed candidate was ron paul this time but big money made sure he was shut out by media. i wish he would go independant and the fooled voters would put him in. then go to work on congress. check out the “obama deception ‘ online. they talk abou the elitist backed presidents of the past. i believe it goes back to ike or further. i don”t think kennedy was in onbeing with this bunch. it might go furthe back than that. common people, wake up.

    • Ray

      Don, I agree with you. Kennedy was going to sign a bill to do away with the federal reserve. Executive Order 11110 was going to do away with those bunch of crooks. See this http://web.archive.org/web/20041015152049/www.jfklibrary.org/exec_orders/eo11110.html
      Kennedy’s assassination was a warning to all future presidents or anyone else who would try to mess with the BIG money boys.

      • Wyatt

        It would seem that way Ray . I have long thought Kennedy was killed by people within his own party, or at least with their knowledge. All because he was halting the agenda of the Liberal faction who were trying to turn us into a communist nation . Slowly , The Democrats have been moving us closer and closer . This clown running the country now is rushing us head long in to it . The Buffet rule ? Yes , take all our money so he and his cronies can all belly up to the Buffet

      • Meteorlady

        I believe that Kennedy did actally sign this bill and he was dead 6 month later? Seems such a coincedence….

  • runstowin

    Voting in national elections is of course, an act of impotence.

    • Ted Crawford

      It’s better to have fought and lost than to never have had the courage or personal sense of responsibility to fight at all!

      • runstowin

        Voting for a candidate selected for us is an abject exercise in impotence, it is not fighting, it is abdicating your responsibility to fight.

    • Meteorlady

      Not if there is a concerted effort via email and the interenet to write in a Candidate….. By-pass the two party system.

  • http://www.ifonlyphotos.com Alex Frazier

    There’s no delicate way to end the Fed. It needs to be done, and it can be done. But it’s going to take the same tactics used by Jackson, and then a few more above and beyond that.

    Read the history about what happened when Jackson challenged the Bank of the United States. The bank contracted the money supply and created a depression. In other words, they tried to put the squeeze on Jackson to get him to back down due to financial woes being experienced by the people.

    Fortunately, in his day the people were aware of where the problem was coming from. I don’t know that we’ll be so lucky this time. There are too many liberals who will eagerly blame the president during such a crisis. So the bank’s tactic might work this time, as it will most assuredly make things difficult by raising interest rates, requiring higher reserves in local banks, etc., which will tighten credit, make borrowing more costly, cause a stock market crash, and ultimately a depression. That’s what happened in the late 20s. They raised interest rates, and the entire house of cards came crashing down.

    So the Fed does need to go. But don’t think for a second that we can put down this rabid dog without getting bit.

    • Meteorlady

      I believe John F. Kennedy signed an Executive Order (11110) that would have effectively ended the Federal Reserve. I’m hazy but I think it stated that the Federal Government could no longer borrow money from them which would have put them out of business.

      I think Ron Paul could do it and do it well. He has a great understanding of that institution.

      • Windrinker

        Yes, and JFK was murdered six weeks later.

        The owners of the Fed Bank are not going to give up their strangle hold on this country without a fight..They are the real “shadow government” that controls us.

        We will never be free and masters of our own fate until we get rid of these powerful adversaries. Right now, “they own us.”

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Good description: shadow government. That shadow government has an extreme direct control over what happens to us even though it’s a shadow. Maybe a better description would be a “clandestine government” or a “secret government”? What ever it is, most people don’t recognize it for what it is and have no idea that they need to do anything about it. Yes, they won’t go down without a fight.

      • DaveH

        The case for Gold:
        http://library.mises.org/books/Ron%20Paul/Case%20for%20Gold.pdf

        Thank you Mises Institute.

      • arizbill

        To Meteorlady. If Kennedy signed a bill to eliminate the Fed why is it not eliminated?

      • Meteorlady

        AZ – because LBJ took office and never enforced it. It’s not a law or constitutional amendment it’s just an EO.

  • JC

    “I am not among those who fear the people.
    They, and not the rich, are our dependence for continued freedom.
    And to preserve their independence,
    We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.
    We must make our election between economy and liberty
    or profusion and servitude.

    If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and
    in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and
    our amusements, for our calling and our creeds
    as the people of England are, our people, like them,
    must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four,
    give the earnings of fifteen of these
    to the government for their debts and daily expenses;
    and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread,
    we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal and potatoes;
    have no time to think,
    no means of calling our miss-managers to account
    but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves
    to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers.

    Our land-holders, too, like theirs,
    retaining indeed the title and stewardship of estates called theirs
    but held really in trust for the treasury,
    must wander, like theirs, in foreign countries,
    and be contented with penury, obscurity, exile,
    and the glory of the nation.

    This example reads to us the salutary lesson,
    that private fortunes are destroyed by public
    as well as by private extravagances.

    And this is the tendency of all human governments.
    A departure from principle in one instance
    becomes a precedent for the second;
    that second for a third; and so on,
    till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery,
    to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering.

    Then begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia,
    which some philosophers observing to be so general in this world,
    have mistaken for the natural, instead of the abusive state of man.

    And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt.
    Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.”
    – Thomas Jefferson
    (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
    Source: Letter to Samuel Kercheval, Monticello, July 12, 1816

    And there you have it.
    END THE FED

  • http://gillysrooms.blogspot.com GILLYSROOMS IN AUSTRALIA

    The best and only way to claw back most of the benefits the Federall Reserve has given to these corporations is to have the federal govt increase both income and asset taxes taxes especially if they did not demand equity at the same time as handing out financial assistance. The Federal Reserve had to pump up the deflated financial markets to avoid an implosion of the whole system but now its got to be pay day for tax payers…

    • Meteorlady

      It’s payday for every man, woman and child in this country. We will all share higher food prices, gas prices, a devaluation of the dollar, double digit interest rates (if you can find credit) and double digit inflation.

    • DaveH

      Oh sure, punish people who didn’t have anything to do with the mess and reward the Politicians, who did, with even more money. Taking money out of the hands of the people who invest most in Capital Goods (productive machinery, plants, etc.) and putting it in the hands of Government, which just consumes it, is about as ignorant a move as we could make.

    • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

      GILLYSROOMS IN AUSTRALIA, I’m not a financial genius but I’ve been in business for enough years now to know that what you suggest “The best and only way to claw back most of the benefits the Federall Reserve has given to these corporations is to have the federal govt increase both income and asset taxes taxes…” is a load of nonsense. I’m being kind here as I wanted to say something stronger.

      You obviously have never been in any kink of business that was successful or you would never suggest this. A couple of questions: first: where does a business corporation get it’s income from? Next: If the government does impose a tax where does the business corporation get the funds to pay it? Finally: who is it that ultimately pays those taxes?

      I’ll try to do a credible job at some answers and people with more knowledge than I have can straighten me out if I’m wrong.

      First, business corporations get there incomes from the products and services they sell. Yes they can get investment capital from the sale of stocks but, their real wealth comes from the sale of products and services.

      Second, when the government imposes a tax the business corporation has to take funds from it’s income to pay the taxes. Since a business corporation must make a profit to stay in business they have to make up the difference by increasing the cost of their products and services.

      Finally, the consumer buys the products and services the business corporation sells. Those taxes are hidden in the cost of the product so the consumer gets mad at the business for gouging them and not at the government for imposing the tax. The real point is that it’s you and me the consumer who pays all corporate taxes. All of them and not just some of them are paid by us. The only businesses that end up paying tax are the ones that go belly up because they weren’t successful at passing the tax on to the consumer. I realize that there are many reasons that businesses fail but, excessive taxes are one cause. No successful corporation will ever pay a tax it will only pass the tax onto the consumer in the form of higher prices then pass the difference to the government.

      • http://gillysrooms.blogspot.com GILLYSROOMS IN AUSTRALIA

        Income taxes are paid out of a proportion of the profit any businesses make after deducting all expenses whether funded by cash or non funded depreciation. All businesses and private individuals should pay taxes if they make a profit after trading or working.. I cant imagine any USA company putting capital into making widgets if all you have to do is import them from China or India where they use very much cheaper labour than even the cheapest wage rate in the USA. No bank will lend in such circumstances of stupidity unless you offer some other form of property or asset as security, as some banks might not mind if you get competed out of business by another operator who imports those similar but cheaper widgets. Some types of services cannot be imported except cheap labor from Mexico perhaps, and some specialty products or services need to be made or performed in the USA.

        Everyone needs to pay taxes to keep your economy going and its up to your representatives who you been voting in for the last 300 years to do what the majority wants them to do even if you as an individual or a group do not agree with the results.. That’s life, but some of you guys can’t accept the results of every one of your elections and continue to be bad losers when your party does not win.You act in a treasonous way with what some of you and your representative do against the good running of your elected or part majority elected government. I don’t blame you for being that way as it is the nature of men who have strong political beliefs and I myself do it sometimes too. Every time you have an election the losers complain that they could do it better and when they do win…THEY DO LITTLE to improve your economic situation.

        Taxes cannot be apportioned according to some fair sharing system…it does not work that way. , Unfortunately your economy is not structured to suddenly cut expenditure programs to counterbalance lower taxes, that instant program will put your economy into a much worse situation than your in now…it will nosedive and gold prices will rise substantially for the benefit of traders and the major holders of gold such as the Chinese.

        Those of you who might like to make more money out of such a scenario would in my opinion be unpatriotic to wish to profit from the demise of everyone else in your community IMO. i SUGGEST THERE ARE OTHER PROVEN WAYS TO MAKE THE PRICE OF GOLD SKYROCKET WITHOUT HAVING TO WRECK YOUR ECONOMY IN THE PROCESS BUT IT MIGHT NOT BE THE AMERICAN CORPORATE SECTOR. WHO WILL BE ABLE TO CAUSE THE PRICE TO RISE.

        IMO the Chinese seem to own or control most of the gold and one way to increase the price or manipulate the price of gold..is to simply close down all the gold mining operation in which they have a management control in ….how long? Maybe a month or more? Any traders out there could work out what would happen to futures prices? Example EXTRADA did it with the price of Copper many years ago by closing down some Australian copper mines…

        The reality is that your economy cannot operate without more people or corporations paying higher taxes…and so get on with it and pay more income taxes or pay more by losing everything in your financial collapse..I CANT PUT IT IN ANY OTHER LANGUAGE. iF YOU PAY MORE TAXES, THEN YOU WILL MAKE MORE MONEY AND GET TO KEEP WHAT YOU OWN NOW. LOOK AT THE SO CALLED SMART GREEKS…HOW SMART ARE THEY NOW??? DO YOU WISH TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS TOO?? JUST THINK ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR CONTINUAL EGO BICKERING IN CONGRESS. ITS A TOTAL DISGRACE…IMO but you might think the Republicans are being clever, but i doubt it.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        GILLYSROOMS IN AUSTRALIA, you prove my point about your knowledge of business. It doesn’t matter if the product comes from the US or China, if the good ole gov puts a tax on the business the business turns around and adds the cost back into the price of the product. Then to make matters even worse than they are we pay a sales tax on top of all of those corporate taxes that we already paid for while purchasing a product or service. Talk about a double whammy: a tax and a tax calculated on the amount of tax already paid! You don’t seem to be able to grasp that concept. Who pays for the products? You do so by default you pay the tax.

        And why is it that we have to pay a tax after we make a profit? Because you say so? So that we can have bigger and more successful government crooks? We need a government but not the giant tyrannical monster we have now. I had to ask myself a question: why is it a guy like you, who comes from somewhere outside the US, is so interested in having me and my business pay more taxes? Could it be that you plan on being one of those tyrannical elites? Or, is it that you are a leech or a cancer on society and need the the life blood of the real producers to survive?

        Your point about businesses going outside the US to find cheap labor is another issue separate from the tax issue I was writing about altogether but which has it’s cause in the level of taxes paid by employees or for employees. Here’s why labor in the US is so high: unemployment compensation, social security with its employee paid portion and the so called employer paid portions (total 12.6%, the 6.3% that the employer pays really comes out of the pocket of the employee and add to that social security’s daughters of welfare, medicaid, medicare, food stamps, AFDC), workers compensation( the cost of this can exceed 50% of pre-tax business income for some businesses), OSHA regulations that aren’t a tax but add to the cost of doing business in this country.

        Your assertion that taxes keep the economy going as if it’s a tax that creates wealth is preposterous. Everything we eat, wear, drive, live in; all had it’s beginning in the land. Without wealth produced from the land there can not be any taxes and the reason that this is true is due to the fact that you can not tax something that doesn’t exist. If I have no wealth to pay a tax with then there is nothing to tax. It all starts with the land and what comes out of it. Taxes are only supposed to be a cooperation between individuals to help provide for police, fire fighters, teachers, roads, armies, water distribution systems and other necessities that the people coming together and joining resources (taxes) makes possible but there is no need for this without the basic building blocks of society: family, farms and industry. But, what level of taxation needs to be a fact of life? 10%, 15%, 50%, 100%? Additional taxation won’t fix our current problems.

        And just what does all of this wealth that is being forced (no longer a cooperation) from the real wealth producers go to pay for? People who don’t want to work, politicians who only want to control people and a host of other wealth consuming activities that are not necessary to the survival of society? There is too much of that.

        The only way to cure a cancer or to get rid of a leech is to shut off it’s food supply. Sometimes you have to do surgery or you have to pull them off but to do that but, that’s what’s necessary for the host organism to survive. The surviving host organism can then use it’s remaining resources to heal itself once the blood suckers are gone. Being denied blood is detrimental to the parasite but it’s life saving to the host.

        There will always be a wealth as long as there are people and probably there will always be a tax to pay so there will always be a fight between the wealth sucking portion of society and the real producers. Right now I don’t think I should have to pay 50% of my hard earned income in the form of tax to support all of these leeches out there. But, the problem is that we gave the leeches control of the army so that it can come and take my wealth forcefully by gunpoint. This probably warms your leech like heart?

        Show me how paying more taxes makes me more money? Your assertion may be true if I’m one of those cancers or leeches. What you said you can’t prove. Let’s see: I already pay fifty percent of my income to taxes to one source or another and by paying seventy five percent I’ll be richer? What kind of witchcraft makes this possible? I first need to make more money before I can be richer. And this doesn’t take into account the wealth sucking actions inflation has on an economy.

        Thank you for your reply as it reconfirms what I already suspected of you: that you are clueless about business and the effects that ever increasing levels of inflation and taxation have on an economy. It will be a frightening day when this system collapses under it’s own weight, and it will. It will be the blood suckers who cry for and get higher taxes that will cause it to collapse and that will cause the untimely unnecessary deaths of millions if not billions of people world wide. This system can not sustain itself without growth. The people who promised everybody everything planed on continual growth but if you know anything about life you’d understand that there are cycles to everything including growth. The United States of America and the other countries that depend on it for growth don’t want to admit that the USA is headed into the non growth part of the life cycle. It’s unfortunate that you poor slobs in Australia are tied to a dying system and will undoubtedly suffer for it and that it is…well…sad. Suck it up and take responsibility for yourself and your own bad decisions and lack of foresight.

        I fervently pray that if you ever try to immigrate that you’ll be denied entry as we don’t need uneducated people such as yourself helping to make government policy in this country. I don’t need more people coming here and sucking blood from me or mine.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1339255666 Rhonda Reichel

    Romney supports the Fed…..so tell me…..why is he the presumptive nominee?

    • Steve E

      Because too many people are influenced by the GOP Wholesale Brainwashing Machine.

      • independent thinker

        I must dissagree. It is the news media that have gave us Romney-Santorum and now that Santorum is out Romney. If you will reflect on the coverage the news media has given to the candidates Mr Paul has gotten less press than any other candidate. Bachman and Cain even though they are no longer candidates are mentioned in the news more than Ron Paul.

      • Steve E

        The media is the main part of the GOP Wholesale Brainwashing Machine.

      • http://naver sook young

        Sorry Steve, but the MSM is basically owned and operated by the liberals and not the GOP or conservatives. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

    • Meteorlady

      Because he stepped aside in 2008 and let McCain run. It’s always been Romney which shows how corrupt the two party system really is in this country.

  • Ted Crawford

    I have no doubts that all this is not only very true, but it’s just the tip of this iceberg! Dr. Pauls idea to dissolve the Fed. is sound. My only concern with it is, the method and timetable! Once this process is begun any misstep, even a seemingly small one, could create an economic nightmare even worse than four more years of Obama! The Congresses, up to now, have a terrible track record of handling delicate matters such as this!
    I also believe that for us to take this action without a majority of the G-20 Nations taking similar action, would be highly risky! It seems it would take at least a decade for our economy to get back up to speed. We would find it difficult to compete in the International Marketplace! If we were successful we would become an almost unchallengable economic powerhouse, however over a decade we would have at least 5 election cycles. Enough to completely change the make up of Congress. It’s possible that not a one who were there at the start would still be standing at the end!
    It’s a very daunting challange. We need to deciede if the certain risks are worth the possible gains!

    • Gary D Rhodes

      Allowing competing currencies, such as proposed in Utah, is how Ron Paul would move forward without a huge reset gamble.

    • Windrinker

      Lets just call it like it is….an international group of multi-billionaires (Bilderbergers) took over this country in 1913 and have manipulated and connived ever since to rule this country by means of our economy. They have so much money, after stealing Trillions of wealth out of this country, and it has been so lucrative and successful, that they have decided to control the world…New World Order. It just so happens that It is time for them to speed-up their efforts and go for “the big banana.”

      These individuals have so much money that they can buy the presidency and place their
      candidate of choice in the oval office. I believe that is what happened in 2008 and what is planned for 2012, so that they can deliver the crushing blow to the U.S. America is the last Nation standing in the way of their world domination.

      Americans didn’t have a choice in 1913, but we have a choice today. Abolish the rulers of this country…the Federal Reserve Bank, its owners and lackeys.

      There is NO up-side to keeping the Fed, Ted!

      The sooner it is abolished the better and it is long past-due, no matter what the cost.
      Otherwise, the Fed will be the instrument of destruction within this country….along with their lackey, the illegal foreigner they placed on the “throne of America.”

      With these all-powerful people behind him, no wonder he believes he is dictator….he is/has been..for all purposes.

      Most Americans have no idea about the immense power that has been leashed against them. These people can “buy” anyone or anything in the world..

      • chiox198

        Well said….bump!

      • Meteorlady

        Nicely said…. most believe, I guess, that they meet in private, with tight security, just to get together for dinner and a bottle of wine. The fact that any reporters or investigative journalists are run off or intimidated until the leave is beside the point.

    • James

      Mr Crawford you almost get it these reasons you mention are real the danger is real but the rules of success and failure are real and unchanging. The easiest way to insure failure is to do nothing the next surest way to insure defeat or failure is to do the SAFE thing.

      • Ted Crawford

        Sound logic there James, very sound!

    • http://Aol CommonSense4America

      If Ron Paul were elected to POTUS and he tried to do away with the Fed, he would be eliminated. The BOYS at the top of the heap have a lot of power. To bad we can’t just go back to bartering and screw them. Let them eat their money.

      • DaveH

        I doubt that they would risk turning Ron Paul into a martyr. He hasn’t got that many years left, and they would be causing a mass awakening of the populace if they did such a foolish thing.

      • Meteorlady

        Funny Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110 which would have effectivly ended the Federal Reserve system because it disallowed the government to borrow from them. He died some 6 months later just when he was getting ready to start the plan,

  • Diane

    Ron Paul ! We need Ron Paul !

  • dan

    shhhh….don’t wake the wage slaves from thier dreams of retirement payed for by the ponzi-scheme …. redistribution of wealth promised them if they just went along with socialism overseen by the wise and benevolent Fed masters

    • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

      I like that. They are asleep but I don’t think we have to worry about waking them as they are in a drug stupor.

  • LAB

    Yes, the big crash is coming…the crumbling has been going on for the last 5!!! Starting in 2007 when dummycrats took over this f’ng country!!! THUGS and THIEVES!!!

  • http://personalliberty.com/2012/04/20/federal-reserve-corruption-coming-to-light/?eiid= William L Collins

    and all you people thank RON PAUL was nuts for saying he was going to shut down the fed, reserve he has been telling this for thirty years and you still want to put Obama back in Or Romney in why not put some one in that they can’t buy off I’ll vote RON PAUL

    • Linda

      You are so right. The problem is people don’t want to believe it. they think again that for some reason our government is going to take care of us. That is the problem. People want the government to take care of them instead of standing up and taking care of themselves.

      There is a conspiracy but people don’t want to believe it. I tried talking to one of my friends about it and she told me if I believe in that than she is worried about me. She thinks it can’t happen.

      One more term of Obama and we will be a communist country. If I could convince my husband I would move to Canada. But then again it won’t matter because it isn’t just about the US.

      People do not realize that we were sold out a long time ago. this has been going on for quite some time now. Obama is just the puppet to this whole thing. bush was so bad that people voted for him just to get Bush out of office. It was a ploy.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        Linda, your point is well put. If my neighbors, who have an active interest in what I do, doesn’t care about me then how much less does an evil organization like the fed. and the corporate government it owns care about me?

        For all of those out there who believe our criminal government cares: beware as they are like drug dealers who pass out freebies in order to get you hooked. Once hooked you’ll have to return to them to get your next fix but this time it won’t be for free. There is no other dealer in town that can do what we gave them the right to do. Now we have to pay for this oversight either by becoming their slaves or by fighting their tyranny.

      • DaveH

        Well put, Katrael.

  • http://http sean murry ILLIN

    No wonder we are broke with these crooks in office.

  • Vigilant

    Excellent article, Mr. Livingston.

    It is indeed a shame that so few in America understand the depth to which the greedy tentacles of the Fed are embedded in fabric of our daily lives. There can be little doubt that the coming financial tsunami, that which will make this recession look like child’s play, will be the direct result of the insane monetary policies of the Fed, combined with the profligate fiscal irresponsibility of the socialist venture.

    Projections seem to indicate that the BIG crash will come within the next two years.

  • Sirian

    Very good Bob, the more people read, the more they will finally understand. I have personally passed out over twenty copies of “The Creature from Jekyll Island” and the understand level has grown and grown. The more people know about the Fed, the masters of fiat thievery, the life span of it shall be shortened. Thanks again Bob, great article.

  • s c

    Utopians, the Fed is a PRIVATE CORPORATION. It is a MONEY MONOPOLY. Where are you, you miserable, Amerika-hating slimers? The Fed is REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH on steroids. The Fed wants your kids in perpetual servitude. HOW can you SOBs think you serve a purpose when we’ve been trying to make you WAKE UP?
    You hate the TRUTH, don’t you?

  • DaveH

    Good stuff, Bob. Thank you.

    • FreedomFighter

      End the FED

      Laus Deo
      Semper Fi

      • GALT

        “For every subtle and complicated question there is a perfectly simple and straightforward answer which is WRONG!” H.L. Mencken

        Nothing new here, Mr. Livingston…..End the Fed is a bumper sticker, not a solution……hoarding is not a solution……gold and silver is not a solution………..drill baby drill is not a solution……..Ron Paul is not a solution, although coupling him with Bernie Sander’s is quite a pairing?

        But you may be closer to identifying the PROBLEM……which might not be a good thing given the “mythologies” that persist here and everywhere else, different one’s to sure, but “mythologies” all the same.

        The PROBLEM is “free market, unregulated, capitalism”……which requires the term “capitalism” to be DEFINED PRECISELY for it’s usage in this context………the extreme consequence of money/credit/debt economics where the final stage is the creation of “financially engineered products” whose value is completely imaginary and unrelated in any way to the “production of physical assets” except to act as a claim against them, and whose enforcement of such a claim will require a legal framework to validate, and a well armed authority to enforce. ( the government of the UNITED STATES providing the both the legal framework and the enforcement authority at this time )

        The actions of the Federal Reserve in this instance were in fact necessary to prevent from happening IMMEDIATELY, what you NOW all are claiming……is inevitable……eventually. Hopefully, your audience is of insufficient numbers to actually fullfill this prophecy, because in such an “imaginary economy” panic at this point, which got us to the edge, can easily push us over…….and while you will be able to claim to have been RIGHT, it will have been for the wrong reasons and no one will be able to hear you anyway.

        As noted, this is the final stage and because of the increase in the velocity of money, once it was in place, it took less than a decade to assert itself…….to bring us where we are.
        It was preceded by another myth, that continued growth was both possible and a solution to all the world’s problems….but what has grown is population, and the predicted problems that this would cause………this prediction seems to have been made too early, so that while it was always a valid prediction……certain technological advancements postponed the inevitable effects from being IMMEDIATE……feeding both the infinite growth myth as well as masking the unintended negative consequences of the technologies that provided the enviorment for its construction.

        This world of “illusion” is at an end…….and the past has nothing to offer except……things to avoid.

        “The most common of all follies is to believe passionately in the palpably not true. It is the chief occupation of mankind.”H.L. Mencken

        In the spirit of “limited government” and “equal JUSTICE under law”,
        Where are the common law and equity courts?

        http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=130&contentid=9559&page=2

        P.S. This link provides clues to answer the question asked. If should also be noted that in recent testimony regarding the GOA scandel before Congress the witness ” on advice of counsel, declined to answer based on his Fifth ammendment PRIVILEGE.”

      • WhatWillYouDoWithoutFreedom

        Hey Galt here is a solution. Stop people like you from wasting our time by reading long drawn out drivel that comes from short circuited minds such as yours. And yes the answer is usually very simple if you get to the source of the problem. Capitalism is the only source on this planet that will keep men free. Capitalism fails when Gov. and Institutions such as the fed. start making rules that will decide who wins and who losses and by the way at this level its not about money it’s about control. You want more regulation, that just feeds the beast that caused the problem to start with.

      • http://katrael.wordpress.com Katrael

        WhatWillYouDoWithoutFreedom, capitalism may not be the whole solution to the problem because not all of our problems are caused by capitalism but at least our individual efforts can be rewarded under a capitalistic system which our natures require in order for us to continue to produce consistently and efficiently. We’ll probably stop producing when our efforts go unrewarded and that’s human nature which no other system is able to address. What we haven’t learned to do is to deal with greed properly.

      • GALT

        To WhatWillYouDoWithoutFreedom

        The answer is NOT SIMPLE…..End the Fed is SIMPLE and WRONG……..which simply demonstrates that you didn’t comprehend the first quote, or anything that followed…
        but thanks for sharing……

        Mr. Livingston’s headline is that the FED has been corrupted……he also identifies the source of the corruption……what he doesn’t do is define it as…..”unregulated free market capitalism” which I define……not to be confused with “private ownership of the means of production”……….which is what capitalism began as…….. just at the term liberal, use to mean “laissez- faire”………

        Now I am sorry if you found that post long and challenging, and I am going to assume that you are NOT one of those who is benefiting from the “corruption”………but it is clear that
        your opinion is easily manipulated by the use of “certain words” which you react to without thinking…….which is what this site and others like it generate, not only in the primary post, but even more so in the comments in “inspires”……..so for future reference, if you can not expend the effort to comprehend what has actually been said when you see my name….simply avoid responding to it…….clearly I have nothing to offer you…..and your soundbite wisdom will certainly be more appreciated by others who have attained the same level of intellectual achievement?

      • http://twitter.com/waitingforshoet Hadenoughalread (@waitingforshoet)

        Amen!

      • DaveH

        Our wise founders knew that Central Banks were trouble. And they kept them at bay for many decades. Central Banks go hand in hand with Government Leaders to help them fleece the citizens by creating excess money which benefits those who create it and/or get to use it first (usually Government), but hurts everybody else by depreciating the value of their money.
        Since the Federal Reserve was created (less than 100 years ago), the value of the dollar has decreased to the point where 1 dollar now can only buy what a nickel could buy in 1913. That could only have happened with negligent money creation by self-centered people who could care less about the value of Mom and Pop’s hard-earned savings.
        Somehow that doesn’t compute with certain people who use the same lame tagline over and over ad nauseam.
        No, ending the Fed would be quite appropriate for everybody but the Leaders and their Political Sycophants.
        For those who are tired of hearing Liberal ignorance and want a real education, read this book:
        http://mises.org/books/capitalism_kelly.pdf

      • Justin Rogers

        GALT – You say “Mr. Livingston’s headline is that the FED has been corrupted”. That is not exactly correct. The headline is not explicit, but I think the implication is pretty clear that he feels the FED is and always has been corrupt, but that now that corruption is coming to light. That he also called it a “criminal enterprise” (without any kind of time-frame reference) supports this interpretation. I think that in a way you fell prey to your own beef; i.e., you oversimplified and got it wrong.

      • GALT

        HHHHHmmmmm

        “Federal Reserve Corruption Coming To Light”

        Doesn’t look like “always”…unless coming to……supported by recent evidence….means always………did you know the Federal Reserve Act was 32 pages…while Dodd Frank is 800 +…….but since you have nothing say Mr. Rogers…..which seems to be a disease here……..I’ll just leave it there……P.S. Mr Livingston is quite capable of responding….he managed “historical revisionist”……..which I found quite compelling. ( not)

        DaveH….did you mean like End the Fed, Ron Paul in 2012. and “unconstitutional”……it used to be three times for the normal mind…….kinda hard to figure out how long it will take when no minds are involved? Nice to see your getting religion though……maybe God will listen to YOU?

      • Meteorlady

        GALT – interesting choice of name though I don’t think you deserve to have it. My belief is that I work because I am rewarded. There is no other reason. Making money is honorable and honorable people make as much as they can by creating, innovating and working hard.

        The fact that the Federal Reserve has run our economy for 100 years makes me sick. AND yes, they are a corrupt organization. You only have to hear and see the testimony before congress about a little thing like a missing $2.3 TRILLION to know that they are corrupt. The recent partial audit has also revealed corruption within the central banks and the FED.

        To give me a lot of big words and condescending comments does not change my mind on the Federal Reserves role in our lives. Nor does it make me respect the IMF where, by the way we just put in more money for the European prop-up.

      • DaveH

        I meant, Galt, that people should ignore your double-speak and do some studying themselves because you are clueless.

      • GALT

        “In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.”
        ― Confucius

        For Meteorlady: One of the mysteries that confound existance is that regardless of what is actually said: people hear what they want to hear.

        I did not disagree with Mr. Livingston’s assessment…….I disgree with the “simple soundbite solutions” that persist……..after all, it becomes quite difficult to state that all government is corrupt, which is the constant theme here………and for which all manner of evidence exists to support, and then to propose End the Fed as a solution, or Ron Paul……..

        If one follows the logic that “all government is corrupt” then shouldn’t the proper soundbite be End the Government? I believe one of those distant father’s of the republic suggested that “eternal vigilance” was a prerequisite………and it would seem more appropriate under the circumstances that the solution is to “end the corruption” rather than any particular institution…….of course, that course would require a bit more individual intellectual effort than chanting “End the Fed” which probably explains WHY that approach doesn’t seem to be favored by politician’s or those who vote for them?

        I also, don’t believe Ayn Rand, made any of her hero’s “bankers” and her exploration “Capitalism: The UNKNOWN Ideal did not seek to alter the classical understanding of “the private ownership of the means of production”………..which makes your comment a bit difficult grasp regarding your implications?

        “My belief is that I work because I am rewarded. There is no other reason. Making money is honorable and honorable people make as much as they can by creating, innovating and working hard.”

        So I am a bit uncertain as to whether you believe that the “quants” and the companies that employed them, which precipitated the present “crisis” and which Mr. Livingston has identified as corrupting the FED, are being included in your definition? If the answer is NO, then you are beginning to hear, what I have actually been saying…….

        For DavidH…….that is why the following books have been offered for their edification again and again….they are all recent BTW and a title search should be sufficient to FIND them…..you, of course, can feel free to continue to “ignore” them……

        Power, INC. ; Extreme Money ; Lords of Finance ; Ratification: The PEOPLE debate the Constitution ; A Rogue History of the United States ; Debt: The First 5000 Years ; Fool Me Twice ; A Brief History of Thought.

        “The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name.”
        ― Confucius

      • DaveH

        Is that the best you can do, Galt — cite books? Have you read them? Can you enlighten us, as to what you’ve learned? I haven’t yet heard you say anything intelligent.

      • DaveH

        Here’s an example, Galt. You say — “and it would seem more appropriate under the circumstances that the solution is to “end the corruption” rather than any particular institution”.
        If you knew anything at all about Economics and the History of Central Banks, you would know that it is inherent in their existence to create unbacked fiat money through any means palatable to the ignorant public, and to use that money to support wasteful Government Spending and themselves at the expense of the rest of the citizens.
        We can’t “end the corruption” because it is at the core of the Institution. Any such attempt would just give them more time to further cook the books. It would be like trying to reform a psychopathic serial killer.
        And I suspect you know that, Galt. My guess is that you’re an administration shill. You’ve shown no sign at all of having read the many suggested books and articles that would have awakened you if you were indeed an information seeker. I think you are here, like many of the other Progressive posters, as a misinformer attempting to divert Freedom Loving people from learning reality.
        If you weren’t a Decepticon, why would you choose the moniker of Galt, the protagonist who was the counterpoint to the collectivist social and economic structure depicted in Atlas Shrugged, when in fact you are anything but that?
        As I said before, anybody who reads the books that I’ve linked to will realize that your comments are just double-speak.

      • GALT

        DavidH……of course I have read them, and I am capable of both transmission of what was in them…..as well as extrapolation from them…..the definition of “free market unregulated capitalism” is very specific and “original”….

        Now I hate to burst your bubble, but almost everything you think you know about anything is WRONG……….and it’s not that you don’t make sense from time to time, the problem is when you do…..it’s like a blind rabbit finding a carrot in the CARROT PATCH……

        Clearly, you have a closed mind……which is probably based on concerns for whatever it is that you imagine your perceived rational self interest is…….and on this site, you are an insider……which is clear because you waste a lot of time trying to eliminate those that oppose you…..or worse, those you IMAGINE oppose you……

        For me you are a waste of time…….so do yourself a favor, go to Bob’s book reviews and read what he wrote regarding Buckminster Fuller……and then consider the fact that every one of those books……is of the same caliber…..they will turn YOUR head, up side down and challenge everything you think you understand……or know.

        I am simply asking you to think……if you can not take the time to actually comprehend what I have written……I have no reason to respond to you……my posts are not addressed to you….or anyone else here except the “author”………what they are here for is somewhat questionable……but I do believe, they are quite capable of responding, if they want to…..

        So, unless you can manage something of substance regarding what I HAVE written…in your own words……you will be ignored…..or cited for the logical fallacies, you continually believe represents intelligent argument……I do SOLUTIONS….which requires actually understanding what the PROBLEM IS!!!!!!!!! Bye now.

    • Victoria

      “And the walls came down”, this is just the tip of the iceburg. Follow the money all the way to the top. Patiently sit and watch.

    • http://factnotrhetoric.wordpress.com factnotrhetoric

      ActOfWar.US.com is the start of a site to document the Federal Reserve Bank’s Declaration of War on the Americans through counterfeiting.

      • DaveH

        Start? They’ve been doing it for almost 100 years now.

      • http://factnotrhetoric.wordpress.com factnotrhetoric

        This whole mess is caused by a $16.2 Trillion Dollar Counterfeiting Scheme by the Foreign Owned and Operated Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

        There are only $9.2 Trillion US Dollars in the entire world.

        In April and May of 2009 the federal reserve pretended to have $16.1 Trillion Dollars in their Vaults and then SWIFT Wired $16.2 Trillion Counterfeit Dollars out of the US to themselves and called it a Bank Bailout. Where the money ended up was in the pockets of the Bushes, the Clintons, the Obamas, George Soros, Biden, Romney and their “Organized Crime Syndicate D”. “D” stands for DICTATORSHIP.

        $16.1 trillion fake US Dollars were SWIFT Wired and dumped into where the FBI and the Secret Service have no jurisdiction. The British House of Lords is trying to identify and stop this fake, counterfeited US Dollars. They don’t want them dumped on Europe.

        This is the largest attack on America that America has ever experienced, and it is not with bullets, it’s through COUNTERFEITING $16.1 Trillion Dollars. The effect will be devastating, by tripling the Total US Money Supply to $25.3 Trillion Dollars.

        In plain terms, there are now three times as many dollars out there, bidding to buy that one gallon of milk. So milk will triple, so will all food, all clothing, all homes, all cars, all schools, and all gasoline.

        Tripling the Total US Money Supply equates to 300% inflation.

        But counterfeiting $16.2 Trillion Dollars is a Really Stupid DECLARATON OF WAR ON ALL AMERICANS by this Organized Crime Syndicate D. If it goes undetected and not prosecuted, it will destroy America and replace our Democracy with an Organized Crime Syndicate Dictatorship where the Organized Crime Syndicate owns the oil under the ground, the drug trafficking, the utility companies, the gold in the mines, eliminates all privately owned guns, owns all taxes, owns the media and have control of the LARGEST MILITARY BUDGET THE WORLD HAS EVER KNOWN.

        GALT is right in much of what he said but I picture GALT as a person bending over and stuck in a position to “kiss his own ass goodbye”.

        I disagree with GALT’s position. I am going to go down fighting and so is Bob Livingston. First you need proof and need to learn who the enemy is.

        ActOfWar.US.com is a summary site to get your feet wet

        TheWhiteHatsReport.com names dollars and amounts of this fake money that went to the members of the Organized Crime Syndicate like the Bushes, the Obamas, the Clintons, George Soros etc. etc. etc.

        Lord James of Blackheath’s Speech to the House of Lords on February 6, 2012 shows how Europe is confronting this counterfeiting attack from the Foreign Owned Federal Reserve Bank.

        The video of Lord Jame’s Speech is at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaA-5_IjkeE
        The transcript of the speech is at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/81988787/Transcript-of-Lord-James-2-16-2012

        And Bob Livingston, do not ignore prosecuting this Organized Crime Syndicate. It’s done by overturning one rock at a time.

      • MAP

        factnotrhetoric, what you say is very interesting. If I can find the time, I would like to research some of what you write. I am no economist. In fact, no offence to those that are believers, but I view economics as a pseudo-science, much like the social sciences. I recently saw a video where a bureaucrat from the Bush administration, who was present at the bail-outs and witnessed the whole thing, declare that the entire charade (the economic downturn) was purposely orchestrated with the intent to utterly destroy the middle class. There would certainly appear to be a massive conspiracy under way, and global in nature. The emergence of our first full-blown communist president being a part of it. These are dark times. And will become far darker before it is over. Thanks for sharing.

      • MAP
    • Pat

      For a quick education on the Fed, the book “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by Edward Griffin tells you the evil story in the first hundred pages or so… the crimes started almost 100 years ago and have run rampant since then. Ron Paul has been warning people about this for years, but no one in goverment is listening.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom