Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

GOP Vows To Reverse Contraception Policy, Some Democrats Differ From Obama On Issue

February 9, 2012 by  

GOP Vows To Reverse Contraception Policy, Some Democrats Differ From Obama On Issue

Some members of President Barack Obama’s own party are voicing their displeasure with the Administration on the controversial rule that religious schools and hospitals must provide contraceptive coverage for their employees, Fox News reported.

According to the news outlet, though Democratic women lawmakers have voiced their support of the President on the issue, other members of the party are split over the new birth control policy. Republicans have condemned the move as an “unambiguous attack on religious freedom in our country.”

Representative Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) noted that the decision “violates the long-standing tradition of protection for conscience rights in federal law.”

The White House responded to the outcry by arguing that Obama was sensitive to the objections that people had and was looking for a way to allay the concerns that some groups had over the rule, according to Fox News.

CBS News reported that the head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops urged the President to reverse his decision, as he called the move a “terribly misguided judgement,” and noted the massive negative reaction that occurred.

Personal Liberty News Desk

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “GOP Vows To Reverse Contraception Policy, Some Democrats Differ From Obama On Issue”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • vicki

    What I am trying to understand is what the difference is between telling an employer that they have to provide free contraception and telling them that they have to have an insurance plan that provides free contraception.

    Since insurance companies don’t have slaves to provide contraceptive services, the insurance companies will simply raise prices to “pay” for the service.

  • Harriet Morris

    Let’s not discriminate against other religions. Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t believe in blood transfusions. If your employer is a JW, could he have the right to prohibit your health carrier from offering blood tranfusions to you. There are many religions in the USA who may have a different take on many medical procedures. Who decides? Maybe it’s time to divorce health care from employment.

    • vicki

      Harriet Morris writes:

      If your employer is a JW, could he have the right to prohibit your health carrier from offering blood tranfusions to you.

      I don’t think you understand the problem. If you were the employer and you were a JW would you be upset if the government came and told you that YOU had to pay for a blood transfusion in direct violation of your beliefs.

      How about if you were Muslim owner of a business and the government told you that you HAD to loan money to people even though usury is forbidden by your belief.

  • cawmun cents

    How come only women get a lifetime supply of rubeers for free?
    I feel like I am being discriminated against.
    My rights are being violated.
    -CC.

  • APN

    The self-anointed KING in OUR WH is dumber than a box of rocks. What else needs to be said America?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom