Well, “FEAR” seems to be the single common denominator among most all self-proclaimed “Conservatives” . I find this paranoia and fear excessive and well over the top.

The GOP has tapped into this fear and exploits it in ways that serves them best. The GOP, by and large is guilt of feeding this fear if not actually the ones that create it.

Why self proclaimed conservatives have this unlimited capacity for “fear” has amused me for many years. The paranoia seems to be a “staple of life” like bread itself. They need it. I’m left to believe that they were taught to “fear” from childhood and do not know of life without it. It’s sad really, to have such a thing as fear locked forever in your mind and much of what you think , do and say is predicated on “fear”, that paralyzes and restrict a person from being truly free and a free agent unto yourself.

When I came back from Nam I carried a paranoid of being ambushed for many years. Roads, bridges, rivers, stands of tree lines, blind corners, strangers, silence, unusual stillness, I seen danger in many places where there was no threat. It wasn’t much fun, I was glad to be back, but those years was really hell to live through.

Deerinwater, I,too, in my 76 years have noticed the fear and paranoia of the Conservatives. From the mania of the Joe McCarthy days through the fear of Nixon that everyone was out to ruin him to the conspiracy laced posts of this thread.I think it is a fear that the world is too complex for their simplistic “answers” for the problems.

WELCOME BACK FROM THE MENTAL HELL YOU HAVE HAD TO ENDURE. I was in the military only a short time and I have often wondered if I could endure the mental strain of a war with no front lines.

NC, in your 76 years, did you ever take some time to work on your vocabulary? Frankly, you sound like a typical utopian.
There are neocons, there are RINOs and there are ‘Republicans.’ And then there are conservatives. Why should I think you ever take the time to sort and sift one group from another?
It’s SO easy for some to turn off their brains. It’s the ONE AND ONLY ‘gift’ that utopians have. Hence, my doubts about you, your ‘vocabulary’ and your reasons for being here.

Thanks for your service! But I fear no one and I consider myself a conservative! If you live in a fantasy land and think the world is like playing candy land you sadly mistaken. There are many things going on in this world you should fear and that is that power corrupts most people!

But I do not fear, I respect prudence but I refuse to be dominated by fear of what “might happen” or what someone “might do”

Fear kills the spirit and clouds the mind with question, doubt and confusion. Fear engages the most basic emotions of “fight & flight” and supersedes all other thoughts and emotions, blocking them out.

Fear is a killer of the soul.

and thank you NC, I’m glad to be home and complete today and offer testimony.

When Churchill said; “We had nothing to fear but fear itself” he meant exactly what he said, it was not metaphor but a naked truth.

From Deerinwater: “They need it. I’m left to believe that they were taught to “fear” from childhood and do not know of life without it.”

Well, most of ‘em have been taught to fear a brutal god that has destroyed the word, except for Noah and his kin, blasted cities, and generally threatens folks with eternal hell. And he loves you? Yup, like a priest loves a little boy.

Yup, the root of it is fear.

Rob

I considered getting into the “Fear of God” aspects of the self proclaimed, born again Christian but declined, not having the time to develop it well at the moment.

It’s a delicate subject and touches many, I’m slow to dive in head first without a clear message and purpose. I’d like too! But offending people for the sake of amusement is not why I am here.

But it is a shame the volume of fear we see and hear, things that will never happen and even if they did, it’s out of your control to change.

I’m a old boy scout, “Be Prepared” is or was the Boy Scout motto. I guess it still is. I wear a belt and suspenders, I fish with 3 fishing pole, I hunt with 3 field rifles, I keep my money in three places, if one fails , I got back up to my back up. But I don’t worry and fret over things. You do what you can do and Let go & Let God deal with the details.

FOR DEERWATER–YOUR QUOTATION WAS FROM FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT, NOT CHURCHILL– FROM FDR’S RADIO BROADCAST “FIRESIDE CHATS TO AMERICA.” NEAR THE BEGINNING OF WW 11, IN EARLY 1942. I REMEMBER IT WELL, I WAS FOUR AT THE TIME–NOT REALLY!!! I WA 8 BEFORE ANY POLITICAL INTEREST, TRULY.

Doug, there are only two viable candidates (r)or (D) on the national ballot every four years! How long since we have had a President who was not one or the other?
By election day the “More conservative groups”(R) have picked their candidate from neocons, rinos, ultras or libertarians or what ever you people choose to call yourselves. We Democrats don’t really care what you people choose to call yourselves or how you make the distinction of who becomes the (R) on the ballot.
If you choose to write in a name please have at it! If you choose to splinter and run a third party, Mr. Paul, PLEASE ,PLEASE,PLEASE HAVE AT IT! The DNC will gladly pay the costs of your convention!!

Honestly, you don’t fear Obama?? Do you fear that “spot on ron” won’t get nominated? Do you fear that without Ron the country will be weaker? You really do have some fears don’t you??? Do you have “THE REAL FEAR” that we will get another george w. “the village idiot” bush if we pick the (r)in 2012? Can we survive it? The 69+ million who voted against MCCain(R) in 2008 will have to make that decision again. I don’t see any (R) running I would trade my 2008 for!!

Nick –

Don’t sell out your principles. (You’ve got to believe).

The American colonists had no chance to defeat the King’s Army and Navy in 1775, but in Yorktown (Va), by 1781 “the world turned upside down”.

Nick the only reason Ron Paul “cannot” win is because the Republican establishment doesn’t want him to. These are the same people who come to me every 2 years and ask for my vote then crap all over me once they have it. If this group won’t ever vote for my candidate why should I vote for theirs?

Henry Stock:

Hmmm… That sounds like a threat.

You should be careful about threatening other people’s posts.

GOOD SHOT, BUDDY.

GOOD SHOT, BUDDY.

NO MODERATOR–I ONLY POSTED IT ONCE!!!!!

Sometimes we think a comment didn’t post, but if you refresh after you send the first comment you will more than likely see it posted….just trying to relay my own experiences…there’s no moderator watching you post, it’s an automatic thing…it’s also automatic for certain things to need moderation, or to go to spam. I think the living moderator comes into play when deciding if something needs to be approved, etc.

Well South Carolinian’s are certainly not idiots by a long shot. But they do vote to their own self interest. What is best for South Caroline is simply not what’s best for the nation or the world.

If history serves us, South Carolina’s passion for a good fight supersedes their a$$ets and found blind to all reason.

Deerinwater–Tell me then, why has their primary winner been the nominee for the past 30 years–sounds seated in the very center of the Republican canoe to unbiased observers.

Elections are a business.

The candidates often take home a bundle, win or lose.

Rob

Technicaly you are wrong eddie although you are close enough. The fedreral tas an gas is 18.4 cents and it is 24.4 cents on diesel.

And…. you are wasting your time (a valuable comodity that can’t be replaced) trying to convince us that you are correct and we are incorrect….pssst…we ain’t buying the BS….take your truckload and go home.

Ron Paul/Andrew Napolitano 2012!

But Joe, you aim’t average– if you were, Paul would be much higher on the polls.

ROB, KARL MARX DID NOT INVENT SOCIALISM OR COMMUNISM, FRANCE HAD A BRIEF ROMANCE WITH COMMUNISM BEFORE MARX WAS BORN.

MARX DID, ACADEMICALLY, PUT BOTH ON THE POLITICAL MAP– HE GAVE THEM PHILOSOPHICAL STATUS–ALTHOUGH VIRTUALLY NOTHING HE WROTE WAS ORIGINAL. HE STARTED WITH ATHEISM–GOD DOES NOT EXIST; THEREFORE THE STATE MUST BECOME GOD. THE PEOPLE ARE TOO STUPID FOR SELF GOVERNMENT–THEY MUST BE DICTATED TO, IN EVERY FACET OF THEIR LIVES; IF THEY RESIST, KILL THEM, THERE IS NO GOD SAVE US, THE ELITE.

MARX BORROWED A VERY GREAT MASS OF HIS THEORY FROM THE GERMAN PHILOSOPHER HEGEL– ANOTHER GOD HATER WHO HAD DEVELOPED THE IDEA OF “DIALECTIC MATERIALISM”– GODLESS MATTER ARGUING WITH ITSELF: REDUCIBLE TO A SIMPLISTIC_ “THESIS; ANTITHESIS; SYNTHESIS. THE WHOLE OF HUMAN HISTORY IS THE PRODUCT OF WHAT “ONCE WAS(THESIS, AN EARLIER WORLD VIEW; COMBATED BY AN ANTITHESIS (ACTIVISM OF AN OPPOSITE THESIS) RESULTING IN A SYNTHESIS= THE NEW THESIS–DESTINED TO BE SUBJECT TO THE IDENTICAL CYCLE AND AN ULTIMATE DETERMINISTIC, THESIS– COMMUNISM– IT’S INEVITABLE, ACCORDING TO MARX AND ENGELS, BUT HEGEL WAS MUM ON THE ULTIMATE.

NOTE WELL, THAT MARXIAN THEORY STATES THAT SOCIALISM IS THE ***FIRST STAGE OF COMMUNISM** AND COMMUNISM REPLACES SOCIALISM BECAUSE THE STUPID PEOPLE WILL NOT COOPERATE WITH THE DEATH OF THEIR GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS–AND MUST BE COMPELLED AND CONTROLLED BY AN IRON-FISTED DICTATORSHIP.

MARX CALLED THIS “FINAL” GOVERNMENT, THE ULTIMATE SYNTHESIS– BY THE PATENTLY DECEITFUL NAME “THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT (THE DOMINANT LABOR CLASS UNDER MARXIST THEORY–THE PEOPLE’S DICTATORSHIP–WHEN ALL LIFE UNDER THE ELITIST DICTATORS WERE WERE SIMPLY THE ***VICTIMS*** OF THE OF THE GODLESS DICTATORS.

THE SOCIALIST STAGE OF THE RUSSIAN CONQUEST WAS VERY BRIEF, INDEED.

THE FIRST MOVE OF USSR WAS TO BAN GUNS AMONG THE PEOPLE–NEAR SIMULTANEOUSLY, PRAYER IN PUBLIC OR USING THE NAME OF GOD WAS SEVERELY PUNISHED, MANY COMMON WORDS WERE BANNED FROM PUBLIC SPEECH– THE BIRTH OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. (SOUND FAMILIAR? DID YOU NOTE THAT THESE EDICTS ARRIVED WITH OBAMA?) WHEN THE PEOPLE RESISTED, THEY MURDERED THOUSANDS OF ORTHODOX PRIESTS AND CLOSED ALL CHURCHES. THE LATTER WAS STATE SOCIALISM CUM VILE COMMUNISM.

JOSEPH STALIN, FDR’S “UNCLE JOE” MURDERED 60,000,000 MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN WHO RESISTED. THEIR BODIES FORMED THE FOUNDATION OF USSR COMMUNISM.

MAO TZE DUNG (MY PREFERRED TRANSLATION) MURDERED SEVENTY MILLION CHINESE PEASANTS– THE POPULATION SUICIDE RATE WAS UNCOUNTABLE–WHEN TOLD OF THAT, MAO TOLD HIS ARMY; “DON’T STOP THEM, WE HAVE TOO MANY PEOPLE– JUST REQUIRE THE PEASANTS TO BURY THEM, AND DIG THEIR OWN GRAVES WHICH WE WILL USE FOR THE DIGGERS. I AM PREPARED TO KILL 300,000,000 TO COMPEL OBEDIENCE (ONE HALF OF THE POPULATION OF CHINA AT THE TIME.)

ROB, CRITICS REFER TO SOCIALISM AS “COMMUNISM LITE”– OTHERS, “COMMUNISM, BY THE DRINK”

IS OBAMA A SOCIALIST? COMMUNIST? OBAMA IS A CONFIRMED MARXIST AT THE SOCIALIST STAGE. I BEGAN A STUDY OF CLASSICAL POLITICAL THEORY AS A CHILD OF 12– THAT WAS 62 YEARS AGO, I TAUGHT UNIVERSITY COURSES AT 26– THERE HAVE BEEN VERY FEW DAYS IN MY LIFE WITHOUT CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THIS FIELD. THE SECOND SPEECH MADE BY AN ELECTED OBAMA WAS RECORDED BY ME AND 11 PROFESSORIAL COLLEAGUES, AT SEPARATE LOCATIONS; THE CONSENSUS? THE MAN IS A MARXIST.

ONE OF THE DEBATE MODERATORS ASKED THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES THE QUESTION: “IS OUR PRESIDENT A SOCIALIST– GINGRICH’S IMMEDIATE, TERSE RESPONSE:
“OF COURSE.”

OBAMA’S HATE FOR NEWT IS ONLY EXCEEDED BY HIS FEAR OF FACING NEWT. THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S PRINCIPAL WEAPON IS THE LIE, THEY FEEL THAT ROMNEY WOULD WEAKER THAN OF ANY OF THE THREE POSSIBILITIES, THEIR CONTINUAL LIES TO THE CONTRARY, NOTWITHSTANDING.

If I remember correctly Ron Paul and possibly other candidates have also run ads here.

You don’t think that some of the amendments need to be changed or clarified?

Capitalist at Birth,

Absolutely…starting with the 14th Amendment, 16th Amendment, the 17th Amendment and the 21st Amendments….the rest seem to be pattently sound though.

OOPS!…scratch 21st(I didn’t proofread before posting)…I meant to say the 22nd Amendment.

You can change/clarify any particular thing in the constitution without scrapping and re-writhing it. It is called amending the constitution.

That is right. And that’s why when obama tries to convince the American people that we need to fundamentally change America is nothing but a diaper full of ——–. All that needs to be addressed is everything that has to do with the money aspects also known as torc reform and yes clarifying the bill of rights, the constitution document like that oh and cronyism of all kinds. But not by all means touch the main core element that this country stands for and that is capitalism. And that is what obama and all his Anti-American thugs have been and to this day is still trying to fundamentally change.

Page –

What I’m hearing is that you prefer “death by 1000 cuts” to asphyxiation?

“But saying that, anyone one of the candidates will be better than Obama.”

I couldn’t disagree with you more. You watch too much Television.

Your selection is critical, your vote should not be viewed as a hand grenade.

Dear Houdini1984,

Please site for me the passages from Dr. Paul’s “newsletter” that you consider hate-filled.

Best wishes,
Bob

Hi Bob,

For a full rundown to some “highlights” you can go to: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/01/18/10-most-shocking-ideas-in-the-new-ron-paul-newsletters.html

Here is one example: “4. Thanks for an Article in Anti-Semitic Magazine

Though Paul has denied his involvement with these statements and theories, a thank-you letter to Mr. Amos W. Bruce for an article in The American Mercury—an anti-Semitic magazine owned by well-known Holocaust denier Willis Carto—was written by the representative himself, on congressional stationery. TNR points out that the issue of the magazine Paul praises in the letter includes articles such as “You Can’t Escape the Kosher Food Tax,” “Are You Ready for the White Man’s Doomsday,” and “Racism—Black African Style.”

If Ron Paul can’t control his own stationary and what goes out in his name he ain’t qualified to be President, IMO.

Rob

Dear Robert Smith,

As you know, Ron Paul has disavowed the newsletters, which he said were not written by him. As for the letter, I cannot confirm its authenticity or its context. It seems to me as if he’s responding to Amos Bruce, thanking him for sending to Paul a copy of an article from The American Mercury and copies of essays written by Bruce. Responding to a constituent who communicated to you would be the courteous thing to do. Whether this is authentic, what is its context, or whether Dr. Paul saw or knew of this when it went out will of course be up to Dr. Paul or his campaign to comment on if they so choose. I fail to see that is evidence of perceived anti-Semitism.

Best wishes,
Bob

Bob posts: “I fail to see that is evidence of perceived anti-Semitism.”

OK, I expected denial even though I’ve cited the source and there a bunch more examples there.

What would you accept as evidence?

And! Even though he said he didn’t do it, there certainly is a bunch of stuff laying around. I’d say that the evidence is at least way more than the birthers have.

Rob

Dear Robert Smith,

You ask: “What would you accept as evidence?” A person providing direct quotes or evidence. A Youtube clip. Something that he penned himself. These charges were debunked in 2008. The thank-you letter you cite certainly doesn’t do it.

Best wishes,
Bob

To Capitalist at Birth:
Who then, if not Ron Paul? I just curious.

Tony asks: “Who then, if not Ron Paul?”

Obama comes to mind.

Rob

Why not Bill Ayers or some other admitted terrorist?

Because I think Obama is the qualified one.

Rob

Obama isn’t qualified to clean the cow $–t off the toe of my boots.

But he is qualified to be President.

BTW, you should be able to clean your own boots. They taught me that in the USN.

Rob

i know how to clean them and I didn’t need the USN or anyone else to teach me. I said obama wasn’t qualified to do it and if he isn’t qualified to do that he sure as he!! isn’t qualified to be president.

When are you guys finally going to grow up and stop already with the “racist” or “anti-semite” crap. This kind of crap might have seen like the thing to do in college, chanting this nonsense in the hopes of getting in some liberal girl’s pants. However now, it is just getting old and stale. Get new material already. Do you have anything of substance where Ron Paul actually did something to hurt somebody for no reason other than his race or religion?

I clicked on the wrong Ron Smith post but it still applies.

CAB– PURE, UNADULTERATED TRUTH!!!!!

Suzie, a write-in for Paul is a vote for Obama.

Why don’t you inquire to your conscience about that?

Maybe so and the media can go into overkill but Newt stonewalled the media and it is played both ways. When asked embarrassing questions we all have a tendency to change the subject or turn it around on the other person. Newt plays it masterfully.

oh ye of little faith,

Behind yon clouds the sun’s still shining.

In every life ~ some rain must fall.

“H W Longfellow”

Deer –

I suppose a little water is necessary, but a lot will kill you!

Deer –

By the way, did you realize there are Ron Paul talking action figures available for sale. No joke.

If you want to see some ignorant haters rant, go to:
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/super-paul-pac-selling-ron-paul-action-figures.php

Do not blame the candidates, but lay the blame on the “CAREER BUREAUCRATS”, who are so deeply entrenched in our government, that it would take an Iranian nuclear bomb to get rid of them!

JUKEBOX. you asked in an earlier post how many times Obama voted “Present” when it came time to vote> Your answer was “nearly very time.”
That, in itself, tells me a lot!! 1. That he was on the job “nearly every time” which is a h*ll of a lot more than a lot of politicians. and 2. that his vote was not for sale for a “yes” or “no” vote “nearly every time” which is probably a record among politicians.

Nice try but no cigar!

Which is becoming every day, a more distinct possibility.

An Iranian freighter along the east coast at 100km seaward, from the Jersey shore, in only 12 minutes AND THREE SHOTS could take our Boston, Greater New York City, and Washington/Baltimore with Atomic weaponry (which they may have now, or will have soon) –and short range missiles– (which they DO HAVE HAVE NOW). A simultaneous “friendly” freighter off the West Coast near San Francisco could, in the same, way, destroy the entire Bay area, Seattle, and Los Angeles closing 96% of American ports, destroying the electrical power and crucial communications capacity of 50% of the U.S population–including the U.S Capitol, the Pentagon, not to mention 25- 30%, plus of the country’s population.

Carrying an Italian or Greek flag, counter reconnaissance (a miracle if sent– with the President, the Congress and the Defense department incinerated–who would know what to do, and when, and whom to blame if two Greek/Italian freighters among a thousand vessel off each coast.

I intensely studied biblical Eschatology– the Christian doctrines of “The Last Days” (beginning long before seminary, less than the age of eight 8. Just before my tenth birthday, the atomic bombs were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima (1945) and it began to occur to me that there was now a weapon capable of destroying any country–even mine– with relative ease and with the very limited manpower of a small country.

I readily admit that with all my early (and later) studies, the prophecies of Revelation, Isaiah, Daniel and others dealing with the picture of Things Of Finality, are just too obscure to be clear to me. I believe in what is called Premillennial Eschatology (the dominant Evangelical position) but I claim no certainty beyond.

But in the minds of some sage scholars ,there is absolutely NO biblical account, implicit, or otherwise, that the land of now called America has any participation in the battle of Armageddon (The final battle between Good and Evil–biblically prophesied to take place about 80km southeast of present day Haifa, Israel. “Harmageddon: Greek from Hebrew: “the valley or plain of Gedon–Rev.16;14-16 KJV.

I bow to their judgement. But just before my 11th birthday, (1948) God fulfilled a 3,000-year old promise and rebirthed Israel. accordingly, I knew if the prophets desired to prophesy about a new land rising in 2500 years (ours) they were more than divinely endowed.

So the sage scholars recognize some participating nations beyond Israel, but all are Euro-Asian. And since childhood, I still wonder why the USA won’t be there.

Can you imagine how many virgins Iran will be given for taking us out? If the Word of God teaches anything to us it says ARMAGEDDON IS IMMINENT.

There was an interview with folks and one question was to men. What would you give up to watch the Superbowl. 15% said that they would not go to the hospital to see their baby born if it meant giving up any part of the Superbowl. Hmmmm!

Penny –

So you too prefer the Republic die from asphyxia or prolonged blood letting. I suppose, then, the Continental army should have folded when they were driven from Bunker Hill in 1775?

I guess if we were still British subjects most of the anti-Paul advocates would make a case to be loyal to the British crown?

It appears we have finally become a nation of sunshine soldiers and cheap goods peddlers.

PENNY, RON PAUL MAY BE MANY THINGS– BUT HE ISN’T DUMB.

DOCTOR PAUL KNOWS HE CANNOT WIN THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION, BUT HE HAS KNOWN THAT FROM DAY ONE.

WHAT HE CAN DO IS AIR OUT HIS POLITICAL IDEAS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHICH HE FEELS WILL HELP, EITHER HIMSELF, OR SOME FUTURE CANDIDATE WITH HIS LIBERTARIAN VIEWS.

MOREOVER, IF HE STAYS IN THE RACE WITH WHATEVER SUPPORT–HE’S IN A GOOD POSITION TO PARLEY HIS POLITICAL CLOUT–DEPENDING ON ITS MASS– TO ADVANTAGE WITH THE REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT. (YES, VIRGINIA THERE REALLY IS AN ESTABLISHMENT– IN BOTH PARTIES– THESE ARE THE REPUBS THAT INSISTED ON RICHARD NIXON AND SENATOR McCAIN) PERHAPS,HE CAN EVEN FIND COMMITMENTS TO BE APPOINTED TO MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS–MAYBE CABINET LEVEL.

I CANNOT VOTE FOR HIM AS PRESIDENT–THE REASONS ARE PARTIALLY POLITICAL, PARTIALLY SPIRITUAL. BUT I WOULD CERTAINLY SUPPORT HIM FOR SOME AREAS OF HIS PERCEIVED PLATFORM–SOME OF WHICH ARE NOT REALLY COMMON IN CURRENT REPUBLICAN POWER CLIQUES– AND TOTALLY ABSENT AMONG THE RANKS OF VIRTUALLY ALL DEMOCRATS.

I WOULD NOT SUPPORT HIM FOR AS HEAD, IN ANY WAY OF THE FEDERAL BANK SYSTEM–FOR I, AS HE, WOULD BE ONLY SATISFIED IF THAT VILE CRIMINAL SYSTEM WERE PADLOCKED.

HE WOULD, I THINK, BE VERY EFFECTIVE IN BRINGING THE LABOR DEPARTMENT UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL CONTROL– ESPECIALLY IF HE WOULD PUSH IT OVER AND START ALL OVER WITH A NEW ORGANIZATION UNDER COMPLETE, NON-NEGOTIABLE CONGRESS RULE.

OBAMA HAS, AMONG OTHER THINGS SHOWN US THE HORRIBLE, DANGEROUS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL MOVES AVAILABLE TO A ROGUE, RADICAL PRESIDENT THROUGH DELIBERATE, ALIEN INTENT.

CONGRESS MUST ADDRESS THIS ACUTE DANGER, JUST IN CASE OBAMA 11 APPEARS ON OUR SCENE AND OUR ALIEN LEFTEST PRESS DECIDES TO DECEIVE AND LIE HIM INTO DC ALSO.

IF THESE RANK, FOURTH ESTATE, FIFTH COLUMNISTS, HAD GRILLED OBAMA WITH 10% OF THE ENERGY EXPENDED ON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES– BARACK OBAMA WOULD STILL RESIDE IN CHICAGO.

THESE DUDES HAVE BECOME PATENT ENEMIES OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMERICA.

A RECENT PEW POLL, FOUND 72% OF AMERICAN CITIZENS(OF ALL POLITICAL PARTIES)BELIEVE THE NATIONAL MEDIA IS BIASED IN FAVOR OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS–READ LEFTIST DEMOCRATS. ONLY .08% DID NOT AGREE, AND 20% “DID NOT KNOW.” THE LATTER IS A PATHETIC REALITY.

IS IT ANY WONDER THIS REPUBLIC IS NEARING ITS POLITICAL/ECONOMIC DEATHBED?

PAUL’S ECONOMIC ACUMEN PUTS HIM IN SEVERAL POSITIONS– IF HE STAYS IN THE RACE, HIS CHANCES EXPAND.

I DO PRAY THAT IF HE SHOULD CHOOSE A THIRD PARTY RUN– HE WILL RUN AGAINST OBAMA AS A NEODEMOCRAT/LIBPUBLICAN, AND ONLY ACCEPT VOTES THAT WOULD OTHERWISE GO TO DOCTOR DECEIT.

ITS HIGH TIME AMERICAN PATRIOTS GOT A BREAK–IF WE LOSE THIS ONE–WHAT IS OUR FUTURE WORTH?

“IF WE LOSE THIS ONE–WHAT IS OUR FUTURE WORTH?”..

And that’s the problem.. We’re only thinking about OUR sorry butts.. Paying little or no attention to what we do or say today will affect our children of tomorrow. We need to think beyond our needs and create a safeguard for the adults of tomorrow just as our parents and grandparents sacrificed for us. We dropped the ball because life failed to include ‘WE’ and started to exist with “ME”.. Therefore, vote as if you were voting for your children’s sake. Who? You decide.

Wicked, If you cannot equate Our Future with Our Children and Grandchildren and their grandchildren– wait until your sober and read the comments again.

Your problem are not any concern about others,rather as many Americans today– you are uncomfortable with having to think about “unthinkable things”– “whistling past the graveyard,” a way of life for many.

“WE MUST think about ‘unthinkable things’ because when things become unthinkable, THINKING STOPS and action becomes mindless.” Senator William Fulbright

This is one of the few Democrat quotations I feel clear and powerful enough to cite. And it is exceedingly important to this country at this time.

How sure are you that the above editorial isn’t just a bunch of lies and distortions???

All you have to do is look at his voting record. What Newt says and what he does are two different things.

Yes, and almost every complaint I hear about Newt has to do with things he has said. How did he legislate? I mean, other than leading the charge for welfare reform, reduced deficits, and other things conservatives claim to care about.

Yes, he often speaks off the cuff and says things that many conservatives find disturbing. As a leader, however, he generally tried to lead from the conservative point of view. Given his constant admonition to always seek consensus before trying to make stark changes to policy, most of his statements can be attributed to his desire to have a conversation about controversial issues prior to proposing a firm policy. What exactly is so wrong with that approach to communicating with and educating voters?

How many times did Obama vote “PRESENT” in any legislative office he has held, instead of yes or no? ANSWER: Nearly every time.

How did he legislate? For starters he had impeachment hearings over extra-marital affairs, while having one himself. There’s an old saying for this, those who live in glass houses, shouldn’t throw stones. There’s another, pot to kettle, you’re black.

Seriously, it takes some real arrogance to place one’s self in a position to stand in legal/this case congressional proceedings over another individual; when one’s guilty of the same sort of thing, that they’re leveling the charge over another on… Doing one thing, and accusing another of the same thing is hypocracy. Having impeachment hearings, a legal procedeing, or somehow putting one’s self in a position to preside over another, for the very same activity is not only hypocritical, it’s quite frankly over the top…

Dear Guest,

Because I documented what I presented. If you can prove an inaccuracy there, please do so. I will correct it.

Best wishes,
Bob

Not that it means much at this time, but we met many years ago . . . at a karate match, believe it or not. I think it was one of the sadder days in my life when you resigned from the Congress.

I’m writing simply to say: Don’t you think we have heard enough of what’s wrong with the country, what’s wrong with the candidates, who is BAD. I want to know who is GOOD. Obama is leading us forceably down the road to Communism, and that’s bad. We NEED to know who will
stop that progression. What happened to the good guys in this country?

i wouldn’t waste my time, Bob, it is called an exercise in futility.

Dear EdinNola,

I am not former Congressweasel Bob Livingston the adulterer.

Best wishes,
Bob

Bob Livingston says:
January 25, 2012 at 10:34 am
Dear EdinNola,

“I am not former Congressweasel Bob Livingston the adulterer.

Best wishes,
Bob”
Who cares?They keep bringing that silly subject up.Tell them it is none of their business.Better yet,tell them you won’t dignified that with an answer.

Coal Miner.

If you wait for a candidate that hold all the same views you do, you will never have anyone to vote for. That doesn’t mean just accepting everything that comes from the media or even the candidate themselves. We will always vote for the lesser of two evils. If you don’t think so, you are fooling yourself.

I will support whichever one wins the nomination. I will hold my nose for any of them.

You can’t blame them for their ignorance Alice, the media, even the candidates have pointed them in that direction.. I too see Ron Paul as a chance for healing of this Country.. Many say they can’t understand him, that he’s living in his own fantasy world of yore.. I say he makes perfect sense. Fact is, the only way to see his views is to forsake your desire that he’s speaking directly at you.. Speaking like the other candidates who live the fallacy that you can win votes one at a time thus making you feel warm inside because your certain that he’s speaking directly at you while Ron Paul is speaking directly at the Nation and ALL who live or at least value the constitution.. Speaking as such, many can’t understand his message because they have been conditioned to live in the ‘ME’ generation thus when the fools speak as if they were talking directly at you, just realize their actually looking through you to see the stately position they will live once they convince you that their sincerity leans toward your needs.. Obama used this gimmick (as had those before him) and in each case, the winner NEVER fulfilled either your or your neighbors dreams. Only two candidates has spoken in the words of the constitution.. DDE who became the president and Ron Paul (in waiting). Ron Paul has gone beyond the ‘user’ mold by speaking to and for the nation.

Goldwater had the right ideas, but unless you’re elected, you can’t get anything done. As much as I feel Newt is patronizing, people tend to only choose people who act with certainty, not honesty.

CJ –

I guess we DO get the government we deserve.

A very good point CJ.

So you don’t care about protecting life. Ron Paul does, he’s pro-life. Hitler was pro-choice, too. He believed in aborting others. And, same-gendered individuals have every right to marry and serve openly in the military, but their lifestyle and the lifestyle of those who sleep before marriage together are living the immoral life.

Both M & N are degenerated bastard. They are lying left and right. That’s what the brainless masses like. The media has done a great job a lot people in Fla doesn’t know about Ron Paul. Our future less jobs less freedom in few words more misery.

According to the lies told by the current occupant of the White House, both these candidates will make grand presidents.

Both would make “great” mediocre Presidents at best. When I was watching the Monday night debates I looked at Newt as Humpty Dumpty,full of cracks BEFORE he falls.If elected the Yolk would be on the American people. I also had a vison of Mitt Romney for he looked exactly like Billy Graham, then I came to my senses. I must have been hallucinating for he is really more like Judas.

Only for the good.

Obama would not make a decent scab on either man’s behind.

Jukebox, regardless of how bad Obama is, he mops the floor up with these two turds Romney and Gingrich. Joe sixpack will never identify with a guy who pays a lower tax rate than him who is quite arrogant about how he got his money and who’s tactics in getting it are only applauded on Wall Street. As for Gingrich, no dissatisfied Democrat will vote for him. If he thinks pandering to illegal aliens is going to get enough votes to make up for the lost white working class then he is as delusional as Bush and McCain. He is also one of the architechs of the Republican war on the middle class. The hatred of Obama can only be tapped by a candidate who isn’t the same thing with a white face.

One point to consider: Of all the presidential hopefulls that are in Congress now, not one of them has had the stomach to call out the current President for his unconstitutional acts. The latest being the recess appointment of another Czar. Tell me, why should we believe any of them when they say they will stand up to Obama?

Yes, I will vote for the GOP nominee but I certainly will have to hold my nose to do it. Even when they have the law on their side, the wimps in the GOP won’t stand up for what is right. This makes me very nervious.

Tony, every time Mitts eyes blink his brain re-sets.He says whatever they need to hear!

You are both blind and deaf.

http://www.whichmitt.com

Dear Capitalist at Birth,

Please point out for me any lies in the article. I will gladly correct any inaccuracies.

Best wishes,
Bob

You got that right. I am 72 years old and voted all my life as soon as I was of age. I did change parties a few times.I am just appaled at what people can do and say to get there party voted in. You talk about lies. This stuf makes you sick. My aunt was 90 years old and would tell about our History of presdents and ther great achevements.
I do not want to be a part of this noncence anymore. The truth is so wrong. If you listen to what is said Newt steped down 2 years before the scandel. The DEM. ACUSED HIM OF ETHICS VIOLATION. It was taken to a higher court. In the end they found no wrong doing. Newt was exonarated of all wrong doing. He paid 300,ooo.for the envestagtion.

That’s definetely a new “spin” Dorthy. Where did you get this information? Or did you just make it up?

I heard it on Fox news.Bret Bair [not sure of the spelling]the last 15 min. he has a panel of 3 columnist at the end of his show. Dr. Charles Krauthammer a very smart man. He was ask about this because of Mitt telling it his way. He said Newt stepped down 2 years before the scandel. Newt stepped down because there was the election and more Dem. got voted in office so Rep.were out numbered and he would have been voted out anyway. The scandel was an accused ethic violation by the Dem. It went to a higher court and they found no evedence that he did anything wrong. He paid 300,00 court fees.

That explains it all::: “I heard it on Faux News.”

RP what Dorothy is saying is a matter of record. Everyone can access this information. but I must warn you it may cause you to start crying & cussing because you know liberals can not stand the truth.that is why they stay tuned into ABC, NBC, CBS and other liberal news stations.

The pit yorkie, David Bonnier, was the one who filed all of the ethics complaints against Newt, and it became cost prohibitive for him to continue in the Speaker position. He had to pay all of his defense costs out of his own pocket, not out of the Government treasury.

Where did you get your information. Newt told the story also just like I heard it.

Newt stepped down from the speaker position ONLY because the GOP has a bylaw that says any leader under investigation has to step down from their leadership role. Doesn’t matter if they are valid charges or not. The Dems do not have such a policy and refuse to implement that policy.

Dorthy,
Of course Newt wouldn’t fabricate a little white lie to make himself look better…would he?
Maybe, in the future…instead of relying on the MSM to get your facts…you might try looking online for material to verify that what you’ve been told…is in fact…the truth (that doesn’t mean watch it on FOX and then go to the FOX site to verify..oh wait, you’ll listen to Newt say it and check it out on Newt.Commie…right?). A bit of due dilligence on your behalf will go a long way towards enlightening you to the realities of the world around you.

No statement should be believed because it is made by an authority.
Robert A. Heinlein

Ron Paul/Andrew Napolitano 2012!

THE MARIANNE GINGRICH ACCUSATION THAT NEWT GINGRICH HAD ASKED HER FOR “AN OPEN MARRIAGE “– WAS PREFACED BY ABC, THE SLAM’S PERPETRATORS, THEMSELVES, THUS:

“… A STATEMENT FROM ANY DIVORCEE {REGARDING THE FORMER MATE}, MUST BE TAKEN WITH A GRAIN OF SALT…”

THIS ABC CAVEAT WAS, STRATEGICALLY, IGNORED BY CNN AND THE LIBERAL PRESS. THE DESIGNED SHOCK AND INJURY OF A LEFTIST “GOTCHA” DARE NOT BE ENFEEBLED BY MERE FACT.

CNN’S JOHN KING, IN OMITTING THE ABC, “GRAIN OF SALT” DISCLAIMER, DEMONSTRATING CRIMINAL BIAS  AGAINST GINGRICH— AND, TREATED THE UNCORROBORATED ATTACK AS  UTTERANCES FROM GOD, HIMSELF– DESERVING OF THE  PRIMARY SPOTLIGHTED– NUMBER–ONE ISSUE– OF THE FINAL, SC STATE PRIMARY DEBATE.

AND,  AS IF THIS  SICKENING DISPLAY WAS  NOT ENOUGH TO THOROUGHLY (AND ACCURATELY) DEBAUCH  THE IMAGE OF THE LEFTIST AMERICAN MEDIA – -   DAYS FOLLOWING, FOX NEWS CONSERVATIVE COMMENTATORS,   SHEPHERD SMITH  AND NEAL CAVUTO, INCREDIBLY– IN RED-FACED, TORRID TERMS – BOTH AGREED WITH AND DEFENDED CNN’S ASSAULT ON GINGRICH AND REBUFFED GINGRICH’S STANDING-OVATION REPLY— RESULTING IN THE ADDED AND SIMULTANEOUS CONDEMNATION OF– AND INSULT TO– THE CONFIRMING APPLAUSE BY CITIZENS OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

THESE TAWDRY EVENTS FOLLOWED SHEPHERD SMITH’S RECOIL FROM FOX NEWS’ HONEST JOURNALISM, ONLY DAYS BEFORE, PROVIDING JUAN WILLIAMS A FREE SOAPBOX AND AMPLE TIME TO DELIVER TO THE FOX WORLD,  A  WILD-EYED RANT– INSISTING, AGAIN, THAT GINGRICH’S POSITION ON “FOOD STAMPS” WAS PURE RACISM. SMITH, ALL THE WHILE, NODDED IN AGREEMENT— TRANSPARENT, DEVIANT BEHAVIOR– SIMPLY ASTOUNDING TO ANY FOX- REGULAR, KNOWLEDGEABLE AMERICAN. I AM 7O YEARS OF AGE– I HAVE NEVER OBSERVED, ON ANY NEWS MEDIA VENUE, RANCOROUS BIAS AND OUTRAGEOUS POVERTY OF BALANCE COMPARABLE TO THIS SMITH OUTRAGE. NEVER!

THE “OUT FRONT” PROGRAM (CNN’S LIBERAL ERIN BURNETT, IN HER GINGRICH INTERVIEW, FRIDAY EVENING) REVEALED A WOMAN OF ABUNDANT FAIR AND BALANCED COVERAGE –IN  CONTRAST TO THE CONSERVATIVE, MEGYN KELLY, WHOSE BEAUTIFUL FLUSHED SMILE FADED TO COLD ALABASTER STONE, WHENEVER GINGRICH RECEIVED A PASSING COMPLEMENT FROM ONE OF HIS VERY FEW SUPPORTERS ALLOWED TO CHAT–DURING FRIDAY‘S DIMINISHING HOURS PRECEDING THE ELECTION. 
 
I HAD VIDEOED ALMOST ALL OF THE FOX PROGRAMMING THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY AND SUNDAY AM. ONE THING IS CERTAIN: WITH THE EXCEPTION OF BILL O’REILLY,  SEAN HANNITY,   GRETA VAN SUSTEREN AND FOUR OF “THE FIVE” -(LATE AFTERNOON FOX PROGRAM)– — THE “FAIR AND BALANCED” FOX NEWS PLATITUDE WAS NOWHERE ACCESSIBLE TO GINGRICH, FROM THE DOMINANT DIRECTORS, AIDED BY THEIR HANDPICKED ANTI-GINGRICH GUESTS, THROUGHOUT THE PROGRAMMING LEADING UP TO SATURDAY’S ELECTION.

THE ELDER-SAGE, FOX ILLUMINATI, KARL ROVE AND CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, EXHAUSTED MOST OF THEIR SUNDAY TALK TIME, POOH-POOHING AND ATTEMPTING TO MINIMIZE THE WIDE DISPARITY BETWEEN THEIR NEGATIVE PREDICTIONS ON GINGRICH AND SATURDAY’S REALITIES.

BRIT HUMES’ VITRIOL–LADEN BLAST OF GINGRICH ON O’REILLY’S SHOW MONDAY NIGHT WENT COMPLETELY BEYOND POLITICAL ANALYSIS– RATHER, REVEALED A STRONG PERSONAL AND EXTREME DISLIKE FOR GINGRICH– SOME CLASH FROM THEIR PAST (?) . O’REILLY’S CLEAR, CALM, BUT EFFECTIVE COUNTER TO HUME’S BLAST WAS BRILLIANT AND CLASSIC O’REILLY– NEAR PERFECT IN TONE AND LOGIC.

SUPERB JOURNALIST, BRET BAIR, HIS FACE DEVOID OF THE TINIEST SMILE OR VESTIGIAL GRIN, RESPONDED TO ANOTHER DARK AND ABSURD HUME CRITICISM: “I HOPE THE SENDER’S REMEMBER THAT THE COMMENTS WERE YOURS — WHEN THE ANGRY LETTERS COME POURING IN.”

THE EMBARRASSING MISCUES OF THE ICONIC ILLUMINATI- – AS WELL AS THE DISGUSTING ACTIONS OF THOSE FOX OPERATIVES MENTIONED ABOVE – - WERE DUE TO A COMMON AND POWERFUL AGENCY:

IT IS CALLED BIAS– A POISONOUS, VIRAL EMOTION, FOREVER LETHAL TO CLEAR, RATIONAL THOUGHT.

IT WAS UNTHINKABLE THAT I WOULD EVER WITNESS ANYTHING APPROACHING THE PATENT PREJUDICE OF THOSE STARS OF THIS UNIQUE VENUE – - A NEWS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WHOSE PHENOMENAL SUCCESS AND WORLD STATUS WAS– AND IS – - PRECISELY, BECAUSE FOX HAS DEMONSTRATED, DAILY, FOR ONE AND ONE-HALF DECADES THAT FAIR AND BALANCED REPORTING CAN SAIL WITH EXCELLENCE AND TRIUMPH WHILE SURROUNDED BY STORMY, FOAMING SEAS WHILE OTHER JOURNALISTIC VESSELS ARE SINKING FROM VAST OVERLOADS OF PRETENSE AND DECEIT.

MODERN AMERICA HAS NEVER FACED THE LOOMING INTERNAL THREAT OF TODAY. MORE THAN ANY OTHER SINGLE FACTOR– –OUR DECEITFUL LIBERAL MEDIA HAS PUT THAT THREAT IN WASHINGTON. NEWT HAS HAD THE GUTS TO SAY SO– AND NEWT CAN TAKE HIM OUT.

LENARD HATHAWAY
Lenardhathaway@gmail.com

Dorothy be careful about telling Democrats the truth. It could throw them into spasms. like Crying , Cussing, they have been known to do do in their pants.

DOROTHY, YOU ARE TOTALLY CORRECT– THERE SEVERAL HUNDRED PAGES OF FEDERAL DOCUMENTATION, AVAILABLE, FREE– ON THE INTERNET; FOR YOUR DETRACTORS: SEE NEWT.COM FOR ADDRESSES.

THE NUMBER OF LIES AND DISTORTIONS, IN THE GUTTER, ON THIS SUBJECT ARE BEYOND COUNT.

NOT SINCE BARRY GOLDWATER (48-YEARS AGO) WAS ACCUSED BY CBS NEWS OF BEING PART OF A BERLIN NEO-NAZI POLITICAL GANG (AS ONLY ONE EXAMPLE EXAMPLE)– HAS THE CRIMINAL MEDIA BEEN BEEN SO FANATICALLY BUSY SLANDERING A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE.

NEWT’S ONLY HOPE, AND OURS, IS THE ULTIMATE NUMBER OF THINKING PEOPLE LIKE YOU DECIDE TO STAND UP.

An agenda? Lol, yeah, I guess we do. I’ll give you 10 guesses what that agenda is

Newt voted for the Patriot Act. That’s all I need to know.

Wasn’t the Patriot Act passed after 9-11? What office did Newt hold at that time that allowed him to VOTE on ANYTHING ?????

USA– YOU ARE CORRECT– NEWT WAS OUT OF CONGRESS FOUR YEARS AT VOTING TIME–***HE DID NOT ASK FOR THE ACTS STRENGTHENING***, HE WAS 8 YEARS OUT OF CONGRESS AT THE ALLEGED TIME.

THE RUMORS AND STUPID FABRICATIONS ARE ENDLESS–DEMO PROPAGANDA SPREAD BY THE LEFTIST PRESS.

WRITE THIS DOWN: OBAMA IS PETRIFIED WITH THE THOUGHT OF FACING NEWT GINGRICH– FOR EVERY LIE TOLD ABOUT ROMNEY–4 OR MORE ARE ON THE STREET ABOUT GINGRICH.

PANTY-WAIST MICK WILL MELT LIKE MAY SNOW IN ATLANTA WITH DOCTOR DECEIT. OBAMA KNOWS THIS.

Not only that, TML, Newt is all in favour of extending, and strengthening the patriot act. The man is worse then Bush!

and the comments he makes on his website are believable because he said so?
you seem to be conveniently ignoring the reality that newt gingrich is a liar. he is immoral, unethical, narcississtic, hypocritical and cannot be trusted with a burnt out match.
mitt romney too.
santorun just has a napolean complex

I just saved a bunch of money by switching to Ron Paul
Ron Paul took a lie detector test. The lie detector tapped out.
The chicken crossed the road to vote for Ron Paul.
Ron Paul knows dozens of words that rhyme with “orange.”
Ron Paul doesn’t act like a patriot, a patriot acts like Ron Paul.
26. King Midas shook hands with Ron Paul once. Nothing happened.
he is..the most interesting man in the world
“i dont always accept authority, but when i do, i prefer the Constitution”

Ron Paul is a delusional libertarian living in his own little make believe world. His policies not only would destroy our economy even worst than Obama, they would put our national security at risk. Ron Paul belongs in the 19th century from where his ideas originates. He has no place being in charge in the 21 century world we live in.

Rick Johnson is a Jackass!
(my statement is as least as truthful as yours, maybe more so)

Ron Paul/Andrew Napolitano 2012!

Your teacher told you to write this nonsense from what she wrote on the blackboard (greenboard).

Ron Paul gets most of his ideas, which you deride as “19th Century”, from the Constitution. The Constitution was designed in the 18th Century to cope with human nature, which has not changed. The most troublesome delusional ideas from the 19th Century are Atheism and Socialism, neither of which are accepted by Ron Paul.

The reason the Constitution doesn’t work is because it is not being used as intended, if it is used at all. It was never intended to give Congress blanket authority over anything that could be labeled “General Welfare” or “possibly affecting interstate commerce”.

Ron Paul’s foreign policy seems unrealistic when expressed in half-minute sound bites, but his point that we probably have far more foreign-based troops than is really necessary is worth examining. Can we restructure our international relations so we can bring the troops home and cut a significant amount of our military expense without putting our friends and allies at unnecessary risk? Let’s ask Mr. Paul to explain how he would handle this transition.

Name-calling doesn’t persuade anyone except those who have already closed their minds against the target.

Would you please be so kind as to post the aspects of Ron Paul’s Path to Prosperity that you believe would lead to America’s destruction and give detailed explanation as to the adverse effects of each?

There can be no-doubt, that Newt belongs in a insane asylum, bunking with his pals Bush, and Obama. The only difference between the three; Bush is a mass-murderer, Obama currently holds the record, and Newt, wants to be the new champ/chimp!

“santorun just has a napolean complex”
Please explain, or be dismissed as a well-poisoning troll.

I don’t know about a Napoleon Complex, but if you’re willing to challenge your perceptions, read the article at the link below; then research the information and try to disprove it.

http://santorumexposed.com/?p=133

Seriously, you don’t really believe you’d get the truth by going to Newt’s website, do you? We’re in a sad state of affairs if people have become this naïve and gullible. No, the truth of any of these politicians can be found in their voting records. Go to: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php

Please, get the gumption and do the research yourself instead of relying upon someone else to do your thinking for you. Another good resource is transcripts of their past speeches.

We truly are in a sad state, and the reason why we’re in our present position, that a portion of our voting public are so naïve and gullible that they rely upon major media and what someone states about themselves as being proof of truth. IMHO, this is deliberate and intentional ignorance so that they can somehow later claim, ‘I didn’t know’ and cleanse their conscience. I hold these people directly at fault for our country’s destruction.

FWIW, I’m past a half of a century old, and have watched Newt for the last 20 years. It was plenty obvious to those of us who were not too lazy and DID do the research and watched voting records, to see Newt was a globalist with not one iota of loyalty to this country or our sovereignty close to 20 years ago. This piece of scum, Newt, is a leopard that has not changed his spots or loyalty. The only thing he changes is his act for the public. Go to the voting records, they speak the truth.

Good link that you provided Alice. Let’s hope some people here use it.
Live Long & Perspire: r.p.

ALICE, IN RETROSPECT–IF YOU EMPLOY SUCH THINKING– YOU SHOULD HAVE ASKED SOMEONE ELSE– SOMEONE OF REASONABLE KNOWLEDGE.

NEWT IS JUST THE SAME AS OBUMMER DO AS I SAY NOT AS I DO, A TRUE TWO FACED PERSON WHO WILL SAY ANYTHING TO GET INTO THE OFFICE.
GO RON PAUL……

One doesn’t have to make up fantasy to see negatives wrt Newt… All they have to do, is look back at history, and take a good look at the headlines from say 12 years ago and so. Newt painted his own bad press, then tried to blame it, for his hypocracies….

The real question is if one believes he’s really a “changed man”, I for one, don’t…

Amen, point well made

slapjack, I believe that our beloved POTUS is still most vulnerable on his actions as a community organizer on Chicago’s South Side. He was personal council for Tony Rezko, one of the Windy City’s biggest slum lords, a man who made his fortune oppressing poor minority folks! His projects were some of Chi-Town’s nastiest, run down, roach and rodent infested, non-maintained apartments in the city!!! By serving as his personal council, the Obama’s landed a sweet deal on their Chicago mansion including an adjoining lot which to my understanding was not legal for some legalese reason far over my humble little head.

“Don’t continue to attack each other attack Obama. May the best person win. Anybody but Obamasoros”..

I can follow you with the blunt of you’re nagging slapjack, but fall short on you’re last declaration “Anybody but Obamasoros”.. Even Popeye the sailor man? You (and others) really need to reconsider.. Remember, this is politics we’re talking about.. There are others just as if not worse than the present POTUS just waiting in line for their turn at bat.. You can think with that mentality but beware, you might just get what you deserve.. Now, I’m not saying who you should vote for (as that’s you’re choice as it is mine) but I do insist that you vote intelligently and with as much knowledge of your candidate as possible.. And the only true way to determine a successful vote is to check the candidate’s past successes and failures.. In other words, vote FOR a president, not to OUST a president.