Tony are you that damaged or blind? EVERYONE knows Obama is a fraud. Everyone but you and the rest of the left which is typical. Deny, blame, cry racism. His birth certificate is and has been proven to be a FRAUD. His SSN is identity theft!!
Let me explain: please check this out for yourself.
Jean Paul Ludwig, Immigrated in 1924 from France to Connecticut. Unlike your Fraud in chief Obama Mr. Ludwig lived and actually worked for a living in Connecticut. Obama NEVER lived there, let alone worked. Later Ludwig moved to Hawaii and eventually died in Honolulu. He drew no ssn benefits. This becomes relavent in a moment. Communist commissar Obama had a grandmother Madelyn Payne Dunham who worked in the Probate office in the court house. She had access to deceased records including Mr.Jean Paul Ludwig’s SSN number Which IS 042-68-4425 and so happens to be Brotha B’s!! YES Obama and Ludwig has the same SSN!!!
The reason: Because Obama was either born in KENYA or became a citizen of Indonesia up till his adoption by Lolo Soetoro. Madelyn Dunham scoured the probate records till she found someone NOT recieving Social Security benefits and STOLE Mr. Ludwigs who lived in CT. Did Obama ever live in CT? NO! Did Obama the FRAUD ever work in CT? NO!!!
Point is there are so many inconsistencies on this SOB Fruad, lying POS why else would he spend 2 million bucks having sealed his records, Birth Certificate and school records? Anyone from any of his classmates ever come forward to extol Obama’s past? NO!
Pull you head out of your Butt and wake the F up. Yes I’M TIRED OF THE LIES, DECEIT, AND CORRUPTION TOO! FED UP LIKE ALL AMERICANS.
I’M NOT A RIGHT WING, NOR A LEFT WING, BUT I AM FOR RIGHT AND DOING WHAT’S RIGHT FOR AMERICA.

You are a sexist. Just as bad as being a racist in my book.

it sounds like you might be a little wrong

That is sexist.

And more Balls too! Bachmann OR Palin all the way!! Obama couldn’t lead from the beginning. Mr. Nobel Peace Prize “winner” who in less than a year is bombing Libya without Congressional approval at that. He takes credit for the work of others. What a CHUMP!! History will show this Muslim, communist Traitor for what he is.

Jason-what he says and what he does do not match up. Ask him for his stance on E-verify and making it mandatory for businesses.

I ask you where in the constitution does it give the power to the federal government to do this???
Essentially asking the federal government for permission to work, whether you are from here of not.
How about just enforcing currant law, instead of eventually microchip all of us?

The answer to all big government types is always the same, hand over more power to them, so they can fix a problem you created in the first place
No, no more.

The founding Fathers made it clear that the main job of the Federal government is our security, that is one thing they should do right.
And why is it everyone uses the constitution only when referencing aliens or illegals? The constitution is to protect American CITIZENS no one else. If they want the protection of the constitution, then they need to become citizens. A very good reason to disband the ACLU because they are the worst offenders. Illegals have NO rights.

That 57 States comments has been brought up at least a hundred times on this site. That only means the opposition will have to keep bringing up Michelle’s gaffs endlessly. Correct?

To Jason:
Brilliant reply. I wish these Tea partiers would take this to heart.

i sure can/t see one thing your president has done except put the american people in DEBT

Bonnie – I was referring to Paul, not Obama.

Bachmann thinks John Wayne is from Waterloo, Iowa. John Wayne Gacy is from Waterloo, Iowa.

Bachmann doesn’t have a chance against Obama. Ron Paul understands economics. He doesn’t need a script. He predicted the events plaguing us today, even while he was laughed at for it. Ron Paul was right and we didn’t listen, now look at us.

Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama on every issue. His perfect voting record and his accurate predictions of the events that are happening today up against Obama’s prewritten speeches and his teleprompter… need I say more? Bachmann is just more of the same.

Most people voting for Ron Paul will not vote for Bachmann. We do not support the so called “Patriot Act” because you can’t say you support liberty and say you voted for the patriot act at the same time. They are complete opposites.

If you want to beat Obama, you need to vote for Ron Paul.

You have so much incorrect information, I don’t even know where to start.

“And he also called Ronald Reagan a failure”

Again… objectively look at WHY.

“He wants to be leader and has for a long time.”

This is false… he runs for president because his supporters urge him to.

“I don’t trust someone who backs someone to get in and then tares them down. NO thank you.”

So pointing out thing you don’t agree with, you see as tearing someone down?

“Paul called the American Civil War a mistake”

It was!

“Paul repeated his claim that Abraham Lincoln should not have started the Civil War to get rid of slavery.”

Wrong… he actually says agrees with real historians that show that the civil war was NOT about slavery. Abraham Lincoln invaded the confederacy after a peaceful secession, to subjugate and coerce the southern states, back under central governmental control. Slavery is bad, and I don’t defend that… but that wasn’t honest Abe’s reason for the invasion, as he said… If he could preserve the Union without freeing any slaves, he would do it. You should do a LOT more historical study, and more research on Ron Paul, before you spout nonsense.

“You live a lie when you say you are disappointed in the Republicans and then run as one.”

I don’t see that as living a lie… but rather… correcting what has gone asray, and standing as an example of what Republican should be.

I find it strange how critical you are of Ron Paul, while utterly neglect that your Bachmann voted for the Patriot Act depite her supporters urging her otherwise. Your reasons for not accepting Ron Paul are subjectively based, while you ignore the critical fact that Bachmann is not a good choice.

If I find I am wrong I am willing to apologize and correct myself so let me do more research but something to me does not feel right about Ron Paul. Let’s do it in a manner that isn’t belittling. You can’t figure what kind of person I am by just reading a post (I am a conservative female who loves her country and family, one who is willing to die for country and family).

I watched two debates with Ron in it and he did not impress me one bit. I feel this way with many of the candidates, I will research Bachmann and The Patriot Act, it may change my mind there as well. Ron seems to be along the line to far right where he is willing to forgo some moral laws I don’t see the founding fathers not putting laws into place about prostitution and drugs. There must be law or there is no freedom it only begets tyranny from a neighbor or people, bringing utter chaos. We can’t change and make laws for everything that isn’t practical but have you seen how someone’s drug use effects those around them. I am referring to wise laws. Big government is not the answer though we need to have a healthy balance, leaving it with the states would be better I agree. Perhaps I misunderstand Ron’s reasoning but it still bothers me the same.

My first impulse is to be offended by what you write but that would not be right of me. I have found many times in life to be wrong and having to correct course but I refuse to just pick one candidate right now and go with it. I was merely discussing how I felt (what I had learned thus far, you seem to assume that I was done researching) and not what I had totally decided. You have seemed to have totally picked your candidate and that is fine, great for you but I am not that kind of person. You should be encouraging people to research and learn about all candidates (not just yours) and not trying to force your view on someone else to pick your candidate, that is what many on the left and right want. I have seen how certain people on this site and I am appalled at how self righteous they seem to be on the right and left. Many are offended at every turn and strike in retaliation resorting to name calling and belittling. Wouldn’t it be best to just state facts or opinions and leave it at that. The frustration of it all. I can’t talk to anyone without them being offended. If I am wrong point me to the right sites or the right material and I will read it as well. I have been to Ron’s site and find most of it to my liking but there are still those things that bother me, give me that right as a citizen who is trying to be informed. If you don’t agree with me just point me in a direction that may change my mind but don’t do it in a demeaning manner. You will find you will change many more minds that way.

Many on the left resort to name calling and so do many on the right (I never truly liked the so called statement of right and left, I prefer to use right or wrong, evil or good). This makes neither right. Where is your humanity and tolerance? We are a nation of debaters it was always meant to be that way. As long as there is integrity, tolerance, ideas, opinions and love for neighbor there can be a change but as long as everyone is fixed on their positions we are in real trouble. Even if you think you have come to the right conclusion you should always question everything then perhaps you will be in the right place. Doesn’t mean you leave your morals behind but questioning even God usually keeps them in check. I try to explain best in words what I mean but maybe not doing such a good job. The nations problems is both sided and the sooner both sides learn there is blame to be shared the sooner we can fix it. It’s like two bully’s trying to gain the same turf. Stop the self righteousness and truly look at oneself. I have found I find peace with myself with this philosophy. If you choose differently then great.

Believe it or not I research all the links on here. I appreciate all the links I can get left and right so that I can form an opinion. Thanks you and please bring the links on. LOL..I am a learning machine.

Okay to start with I am female. So far Michelle Bachmann (I am still looking into Herman Cane as well or anyone else who may come in) has my vote. I will vote for her because her ideals appeal to me not because she is a woman. This attitude of history making is what got us into trouble with Obama. What many forget is he is also half white. This man should not be siding with his feelings on one side or the other (when it comes to race) because he is a part of all of us but he despises the white side as he always excludes it. Do you hear much about him being interracial? No, because I believe he despises that part of him. The American people elected a black/white tyrant. Perhaps we need to look at ourselves and change the morals of a people both black and white. White guilt needs to be thrown out the window. We do everyone a disservice by conjuring up a past that is past. We’ve had enough time to mope. This goes for the Indians as well. We are giving them a disservice by continuing federal programs. Many do not work and it hurts them to be reliant. Let them be independent. I want us all to be on equal ground as it was meant to be.

Please do not look to making history just look to what is best for the country and what this person can do for it. Go with your values and principles and pick the one who you are comfortable with. Don’t look at race or whether they are female or male. VALUES and PRINCIPLES.

Just little ole me: Well said! I have Indian in my genes so more than many, I have the right to say this…If it’s ancient history, GET OVER IT!! That includes Indians, blacks or anyone else. There was wrong done on both sides & the government should not be spending money on law suits from 50 or 200 yrs. ago. We also need to get rid of the dash Americans, we are Americans period, not Native Americans, African Americans, etc. Some of blacks didn’t even come from Africa & many who did were sold by your own people so go sue them. As one of the above replies stated, Obama is part white. Most blacks are & many of “whites” have black in their genes as well, there is a question as to whether my family does.

I do go for my values and principles. That’s why I say Bachmann, who voted to extend the Patriot Act, is not fit to be the leader of a free people. You should judge by ones record, and not by what they promise are their values and principles… but by their actions. Bachmann voted for the Patriot Act even despite her supporters urging her not to.

Herman Cain’t is an ex-federal reserve employee. He doesn’t support an audit of the fed. He said they have nothing to hide.

Just recently we found out about all the secret bailouts to foreign banks. Nothing to hide? Yeah right. Herman Cain’t doesn’t know what he is talking about! He Cain’t be trusted to run our country.

bonnie,

All of us AMERICANS just need to put a ‘Constitutional Conservative’ that works for We the People and stands for Limited Government and Checks and Balances in the Three Branches of Government in the presidential office to build and prosper our REPUBLIC…. regardless of sex or race.

If I remember correctly…

The Demos thought… after they saw Hillary not so popular, let’s be the FIRST to put a [half] black guy in the presidential office… and look at the Marxist Muslim, Anti-Free Market, Anti-American we got.

Then the Repubs thought… well, the only way we can beat the first Black guy running for Pres is to have the First Woman Vice Pres… thus RINO John McCain’s running mate was Sarah Palin… she was a good Constitutional Conservative Christian, but he was not.

I’m just sayin’… let’s chose a statesman or woman of character and integrity who has the moral compass (values) and love of our Republic to lead and follow the Rule of Law… or forget it.

I remember a Biblical story where the Jews wanted a king to rule them like the other countries, but God was trying to tell them that they didn’t need a RULER… sometimes I think we would be better without one too… all We need in the Lord.

“Everyone knows he’s a nutcase libertarian.”
Ron Paul is a republican. Ron Paul has some libertarian views, but he has been a republican for a long time. He even campaigned for Ronald Reagan back when it was not the popular thing to do. He is the only candidate that was endorsed by Ronald Reagan. BTW: Nothing wrong with being a libertarian. What is wrong with individual liberties and following the constitution? The forefathers would have been libertarian.

“He is also a 9/11 truther which makes him even more unelectable.

False! Maybe you should get your facts strait before posting on public forums/pages. Ron Paul has said publicly that he does not believe these things, although Ron Paul does support a full investigation.

“Assuming Rick Perry doesn’t enter the race the only smart choice is Michelle Bachman.”

You make me laugh. You support more of the same. That is why we are in the situation we are now. What is the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result… People like you are the reason we are in the situation we are in today.

Carlos, what in the heck is a “Truther”?

You Progressives just have to grow up and realize that your Keyesnian ideas are flawed and everything you have done is a failure.

Until everything that you have done in the past two years is eliminated, the country is in serious danger.

QUIT SPENDING!!!

I agree. Those spendthrifts are nothing more than bank robbers who find it easier to be a politician-thief and get away with it.
If push comes to shove, the spendthrift needs to be arrested and charged with treason (violating the Constitution) and money laundering (stealing the voter’s tax money).

Hypocrisy abounds everywhere. Dr. Ron Paul has proved he’s not part of it, however. I consider myself to be ultra-conservative, and a fundamentalist Christian, but even I can agree with you that Bachmann would be a liability. What conservatives must realize is that it would take someone with a record like Dr. Paul’s to beat Obama. He may not be as popular now as when he was elected president, but getting the independents and fiscally conservative-leaning Democrats to vote for someone like Bachmann is unrealistic. Getting them to vote for Ron Paul is not only realistic, it’s possible, perhaps even enjoyable.

I think that you are as wrong about Ron Paul as the democrats were wrong about Obama. You need to take a hard look at the record of Ron Paul. Look at what he does, not what he says. He is typically a porker and wastes money as bad if not worse than democrats.

I disagree. Ron Paul votes against anything unconstitutional. His voting record is flawless. I don’t know where you are getting your information, but Ron Paul always votes based on principal. He is the same today as he was 30 years ago.

You obviously haven’t looked very hard at Ron Paul’s record. His record is what speaks volumes to … back up what he says! You should do some more critical research.

Bachmann, voted to extend the Patriot Act. What more does a constitutional conservative need to know about her, not to vote for her?

Btw… It is very nice to hear so many of the other commenters on this site supporting Congressman Ron Paul… makes me feel very hopeful for America.

Though Ron Paul seems like a good person I don’t think he is my candidate. I agree with him on most things but one thing has always bothered me about him. Paul criticized Ronald Reagan as a failure. Although I don’t think Reagan was perfect, Reagan did do great many things and I would not have called him a failure. Paul sometimes I thinks goes a little to far right for me and I consider myself pretty right. A little on the anarchy side for my comfort. There must be a small government but also good moral laws in place. We the people have the right to break them as we wish but must face consequences if we do. Problems is I can see Ron’s views as well. Good moral laws would work if we had a good sound wise mind of congress and senate really knowing what good moral laws are. Many of them certainly aren’t leaving it. There are those in the government who scream a moral issue when they want something passed. Oh the good old days when Reagan was president and would not be afraid to call evil, well evil.

Ron seems to be a little to the anarchy side as to Obama is a tyrant.

@just little ole me – “Paul criticized Ronald Reagan as a failure.”

That’s you’re reason for not accepting him as your candidate? Criticizing someone you think liked? Perhaps you should look into WHY Ron Paul critized him.

@Just Little Old Me: Ron Paul never criticizes people personally. He was a friend of Reagan and gave him a “B” as Prez. Why? Because Reagan raised taxes, grew the Federal deficit and used war powers to bomb Lebanon. Ron Paul read Reagan’s memoirs and cites a passage where Reagan said that he was sorry for that and if he hadn’t done it, 265 soldiers wouldn’t have died and 159 wouldn’t have been wounded. Ron Paul praised Reagan for owning up to that.

Want big government and over-reach, get the immoral government involved in “moral issues.” See where we are today. A small, Constitutional government, leaves Tenth Amendment issues to the STATES, where they belong. That is not anarchy, that is the way our Founders planned it.

Another dysfunctional voter…

As for Politico, That’s an Obummer news front. As for Ron Paul he would gut our armed forces. He thinks 9-11 was Americas fault. How can anyone vote for him as a president. He’s alright in congress but not as the leader of the next free world….

“As for Ron Paul he would gut our armed forces.”

No… he wouldn’t “gut” our armed forces… he would bring them home, which would strengthen our national defense, instead of having are armed forces spread over 135 countries around the world.

“He thinks 9-11 was Americas fault.”

Correction… he thinks that our preemptive war policy is incites hatred, and increases the number of enemies we have.

“How can anyone vote for him as a president.”

Because he speaks the truth… he has the a solid and consistent voting record, definitive solutions, a brilliant economist, and has the most experience.

“He’s alright in congress but not as the leader of the next free world….”

The NEXT free world?

TML,

Spot on man!

Even the CIA thinks 911 was the fault of our foreign policy. It’s what the CIA calls blowback. You should google it.

Jeff in Ohio:

Of course you’re “right on” about Ron Paul–the guy is basically a “flake”, has way out far right ideas and hasn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of getting elected if the Republicans make the horrible mistake of electing someone like him–that would just guarantee Obummer another 4 yrs.!

It’s gotten that bad?
The one man in Congress who really abides by the Constitution, and you call him “far out”?
No, Al, it is you who are far out, and unfortunately you aren’t in a small minority. And that is exactly why we have the out-of-control Leviathan Government that thinks the people work for them.

By the way, Al, show us who you know who polls better than Ron against Obama:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/election_2012_barack_obama_42_ron_paul_41

The last thing we need is Romney. Michele stands for all that we, (the Tea Party) & conservatives are adamant about. NO ONE could do a worse job than Obama. Romney is another big government flip flopper. Michele has stood firm against her own party RINOs & the Dems & has not budged on what we sent her there to do. Eyeswideopen,what you are rambling about, I have no idea. Keep up the good work, Michele & don’t let your publicist or anyone tell you different. We are tired of flip flops because of public minorities. Herman Cain lost many when he didn’t stick with his stand on Islam.

Judy,

Your right on those points.

Constitutional Conservative Michele Bachmann would be SO MUCH better that the Lier in Chief we have now and Billy and Hilly ‘[NO] Small Arms Treaty’,'Bilderberg’ Clinton, too.

Constitutional Conservative Ron Paul is a top contender for the 2012 Presidential spot as well.

But ABSOLUTELY NOT Liberal RINO Mitt Romney care.

You got that right,She is a nut case She did not fall to far from the tree

What you said doesn’t make much sense.

And how is it that John McCain got the nomination? Someone voted for him (not me). I held my nose and voted for him over Obama, but sheesh! That was the best the Republicans could do? Give me a break. If people would stop drinking the “he can’t win” Kool-Aid and vote with their guts we would get real hope and change with Ron Paul as president. His non-interventionist / strong national defense foreign policy will win votes from Dems and Independents alike. So maybe the naysayers should rethink exactly what they’re voting FOR instead of what they’re voting AGAINST.

Paul, BTW, did not vote for the Patriot Act as did Bachmann. How can a “constitutional conservative” vote for renewal provisions of the Patriot Act? What they do tells a lot more t an what they say. Who do you believe – me or your lying eyes?