Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

Franks Get Frank: Impeach Obama Over DOMA

March 9, 2011 by  

Franks get frank: Impeach Obama over DOMAPresident Barack Obama's refusal to support the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) has led one Republican lawmaker to consider an impeachment of the nation's commander-in-chief.

In an interview with ThinkProgress, Representative Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) said that he would "absolutely" favor impeaching Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder if he could "gain collective support" from other lawmakers. Franks' statement was in response to the President's decision not to defend Section 3 of DOMA, which prohibits the legal recognition of same-sex marriages. The White House advised the Department of Justice to no longer defend the Constitutionality of the law.

Franks condemned the Obama administration for speaking out against the law of the land, which he believes is an impeachable offense. According to the news provider, this isn't the first time Obama has been accused of legal misconduct while in office. Last year, Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas) hinted at impeaching the President over his immigration laws, while Representative Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) challenged Obama for not providing a birth certificate that proves his legal status.

The American Legion, the largest group of United States war veterans, recently sent a letter to Congressional leaders recommending that lawmakers enforce and defend DOMA. In the letter, Legion National Commander Jimmie L. Foster said that "we oppose all efforts to undermine, alter or otherwise corrupt the institution of marriage." 

Personal Liberty News Desk

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Franks Get Frank: Impeach Obama Over DOMA”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • karolyn

    “Since everyone want research facts, blacks when in prison become queers as easy as using drugs in slum land in Harlem.”

    MEN, white included, do not “become queers” in prison. They sexually assault other men for power and sexual release. It has absolutely nothing to do with being gay. And I am wondering where are the “research facts” you refer to.

    • karolyn

      The above was a response to i41 and appeared in the wrong place somehow.

      • eddie47d

        i41 hasn’t made sense since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.You nailed it Karolyn on the prison situation.

  • jopa

    Never heard of this Trent Frank guy but I probably will hear about him everyday now.Just another mouthpiece trying to get his face and name on television.I would venture to bet five to one he is another Larry Craig with a wide stance or are they just bowlegged from riding up and down on Brokeback Mountain?

  • Jay

    Impeach Obama? Good luck! Although a comforting thought, to assume that it would be a fair trial, much less successful, would be comparable to that of the mafia crime syndicate presiding over its own trial, as judge, jury and executioner. I’m willing to bet, they would be found not guilty! Impeach Obama, who will be the presiding judge, will it be of the same stripe as the ones that upheld obama care, as being constitutional? I think this is nothing more then a carrot on a stick!

  • http://com i41

    Since when is Onumnutts become a dictator to decide what laws to enforce,damn we forget Holder wouldn’t go after the niggardly Black Panthers on voter intimdation charges, attempted assault charges,and failure to appear charges. But we shouldn’t for get they are black racist who always get the free pass card. The muslim marxist moron is showing his personal presudice since he was and always has been a peter puffer just like Rambutt and their Chitcago bathhouse gangs. Since everyone want research facts, blacks when in prison become queers as easy as using drugs in slum land in Harlem. By Onumnutts own words he fits the MO and should have been in the crowbar hotel even now! Liberty must be his good buddy and a soros socialist democrat that voted for the marxist muslim moron.

  • Gary

    Impeach this President? He has more teflon than Ronald Reagan. The pipedream of the century.

  • Alarmed

    I also believe two million should march upon Washington.With though a different outcome than Spitfire’s. We need to organize and make our opinions heard! Does it require Glen Beck ….seems so. So until We organize and plan showings of strength the political machine will just keep on running, doing what they think America wants or needs. We need to tell them what we want. We can’t rely on the media to do this for us. We should find another medium. We need a leader.

  • newspooner

    Marriage has been defined by society in general for centuries. Government has no right to redefine it. If we let government get away with redefining marriage, it can redefine anything, and all liberty is lost because we would then have unlimited government. DOMA is only wrong because it is not government’s business, and no law is needed for the legitimacy of marriage.

    • Liberty

      couldn’t have said it any better than this.. Newspooner.. for those who do or don’t agree with same sex marriage, you should at least agree with this.

      • eddie47d

        Marriage is not being hijacked and men and women will still take their vows until the end of times. Maybe gays need to stop using the word marriage(singular). Find their own version such as civil unions or marriage II and then live happily ever after. You know;Demand the same rights as a married heterosexual and call it a Commitment Certificate. That way you will be legal in the eyes of the law and avoid the constant persecution from the opposition.

      • Ellen

        They don’t want civil unions; they want marriage.

      • karolyn

        So, if they changed the word, it would make a difference?

      • Ellen

        They want the right to marry, not have a civil union. They think that still makes them unequal.

      • smilee

        THEY WOULD BE OK WITH CALLING IT CIVIL UNIONS IF MARRIAGE WAS CHANGED TO CIVIL UNIONS AS WELL, AFTER ALL IT IS COVERED UNDER CIVIL LAW, MARRIAGE IS A RELIGIOUS TERM!!

      • http://?? Joe H.

        eddie,
        you have finally said something with a pinch of intelligence!!! you must have missed your turn on the koolaid bottle!!!

  • Liberty

    This is for those of you who just HATE that this man is OUR president.

    Take a look at this. It is rare but not uncommon that presidents have decided not to defend a law..

    NOTABLY YOUR RePUBLICAN MESSIAH REGAN!!!

    * Bob Jones University v. United States 461 U.S. 574 (1982)

    In this case, the IRS had denied Bob Jones University tax-exempt status based on its history of racial segregation and discrimination, which it claimed was religiously based. The Reagan Justice Department declined to defend the decision in Court and filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the University.

    http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/presidential-decisions-not-to-defend-the-constitutionality-of-federal-law-a-brief-history/

    • Robin from Arcadia, IN

      Liberty… Obama or Barry, whichever, is not disliked because he is a Mulatto, he is ruining our country. Any one with eyes can see this.

      • Liberty

        Said nothing about him being mulatto.. What exactly, what is being ruined?

      • Ellen

        Are you kidding? Let’s begin with the budget of every state (all 50)that can’t handle the additional Medicaid requirements in Obamacare. It, along with the unconstitutionality if the individual mandate, is the reason 26 states sued. How about circumventing Congress everytime he can’t get another bad idea past the Senate? The better question is, Has he done anything of value for the US?

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Liberty,
        and ad nauseum!!!

    • http://naver sook young

      Be quiet crazy one. Thank you.

      Sook Young
      Wife of the Samurai

      • Eddie47d

        That’s really polite!

      • http://naver sook young

        You’re right Eddie. I shouldn’t have called him crazy. But what else can I think about someone who constantly repeats themselves? If they at least brought more facts then this one incident, that would bring more credibility as far as I’m concerned. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

  • B. Holmes

    It is so humerous that Obummer taught Constitutional Law in the University????? It is obvious that he did something else with the students and took a paycheck illegally. There is evidence that the FBI needs to investigate college and university presidents all over the country. They either do not do their job or they are subversive, themselves. If math and science teachers were as retarded in their subject as the Political Science, History, Education, and Journalism departments, the nation would produce even weaker graduates than they do now.

  • LaVerne

    Obama should never have been able to run for president without proving he is a naturalized citizen.. Yet everything he does and says is ignored by the media and it seems he is protected from any controversy. And I know he is not protected by my God.. so I can only assume he is protected by Satan. Because he is tearing down this country and has already told the world that the US is not a Christian nation.. This country was founded on Christian principals and it shows on every building in Washington, DC.. and every one of our governing documents. He is trying to change those documents and has already removed prayer from our schools. What is next?? He is associating and praising the Muslems in this country.. So next we will be a Muslem nation and he will be the supreme ruler.. Wake up America..

    • Liberty

      To you to imply that Obama is a muslim or not a citizen discredits everything you say after.

    • karolyn

      Your God?

      • smilee

        IT DOES APPEAR SHE IS IN NEED OF HAVING HER OWN GOD!!

      • http://naver samurai

        There is only one true God, the Judeo-Christian God. None other rules supremem over him. Smilee, Karolyn, and Liberty sound like they need to go to church and meet him before they get it in the end. Literally. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

  • Joyce from Loris

    All presidents are sworn into office with the pledge to uphold the laws of our nation. I saw Obama do that. Now, he wants to decide which laws to uphold and which to not? Whether you agree with DOMA or not, it is the law. It is a scary thing when the current president thinks he can decide which laws are “good” and which ones are “bad”, or unconstitutional. He does not have that power, but he THINKS he does! That’s the scary part. What law will he decide next that the doesn’t like? Maybe the right to bare arms? The right to vote? Who knows? And as taxpaying American citizens, we want to know. Our nation is not a dictatorship, YET! But it will be if we do not halt practices like this. We need a president, a Senate and Representatives that will uphold our laws, period.

    • Liberty

      This is for those of you who just HATE that this man is OUR president.

      Take a look at this. It is rare but not uncommon that presidents have decided not to defend a law..

      NOTABLY YOUR RePUBLICAN MESSIAH REGAN!!!

      * Bob Jones University v. United States 461 U.S. 574 (1982)

      In this case, the IRS had denied Bob Jones University tax-exempt status based on its history of racial segregation and discrimination, which it claimed was religiously based. The Reagan Justice Department declined to defend the decision in Court and filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the University.

      http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/presidential-decisions-not-to-defend-the-constitutionality-of-federal-law-a-brief-history/

      • mrbill

        Are you saying two wrongs make a right.

      • Liberty

        I’m not saying it is wrong. There were numerous presidents that did it.

        If his job is to serving the people how can any president do that if The law that was passed is not equal. There for how can anyone uphold it under the constitution. If the constitution was a person it would not have allowed Doma under its umbrella!!

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Liberty,
        I find it funny, no hilarious that people here have given you many examples of how he has broken his pledge to up hold the laws of the land, yet you keep comming up with that same little LAME argument time and time and time and time ad nauseum!!!

      • Joyce from Loris

        You are so stupid.

      • http://naver samurai

        What’s your mental malfunction? FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Joyce from Loris

        Liberty, you are stupid too. Did I say that Regan was my “messiah”? I don’t care who does it, it’s wrong. Period. You are an idiot.

      • http://naver sook young

        Do you have to say this childish rant again? Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • smilee

        sookie

        COMING FROM THE MOUTH OF A CHILD WE UNDERSTAND YOUR STATEMENT IN THAT CONTEXT

    • smilee

      jOYCE

      “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” It says nothing about the laws made by Congress and as the Constitution trumps the laws made by Congress and if in his opinion he believes the law is not Constitutional he must then defend it and not the law and in this case that is so and he is doing what is required of him and your not agreeing with his decision means nothing as it is not your call and if in the end the SC agrees with him he will have been proven to have made the right decision. My observation here is that not many on this site do understand the Constitution and it is clear you do not. Quit twisting the oath to read laws when it does not!! Thank you!!

  • spitfire

    Liberals, the dung of humanity!

    • karolyn

      Wow! You’re getting more intelligent with every remark! :-)

      • smilee

        OH COME ON!! WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A MAN WITH ROCKS FOR BRAINS!!

      • http://naver samurai

        Stop describing yourself! FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

  • http://Walkermedia.org ARTHUR

    THE PATH NARROWS IN FAVOR OF US DESTRUCTION BY LEGAL MEANS, talk, talk, talk, by politicians, HELL, DO IT NOW, ELIMINATE THIS FRAUD, MUSLIM DICTATOR, DO IT NOW, NOT LATER. HE SEES THE NOOSE CLOSING, HE WILL GET WORSE.

    • eddie47d

      Arthur; Are you related to spitfire and represent the Republican Party or some far right fringe group? People like you are the reason the DOMA law should be repealed. You are nasty and hateful in your lynch mob remarks.You do not represent America in your diatribes and ugliness and I long for the day your venom disappears.

      • http://naver samurai

        No it shouldn’t be repealed. One man and one woman are required for a marriage, not a couple of immoral individuals. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Doug

        Eddie the chump what do you know about what America wants you need to come out of your moms basement and join the real American race not the progessive, socialist communist you seem to think are such a great bunch! It would be nice to take all of you idiots and put you in a time machine and let you live in these wonderful times or countries under such wonderful regimes!

      • eddie47d

        Doug; Since Obama is not a Muslim or a communist and so far his eligibility is still valid then you are the one who needs to crawl back into your basement. Okay Chump! You can let us know your opinion all you want but don’t label them as facts until you have the FACTS. Go back and join your lynch mob friends.

      • JUKEBOX

        I will accept the repeal when Adam & Steve can prove that they can produce a child by engaging in Sodomy.

      • smilee

        oh my god!! they never said they could

      • http://naver samurai

        Then it should NEVER be repealed. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

    • Liberty

      to imply that he is muslim discredits everything you say after is highlights your ignorance and showboats your hate.

      • Robin from Arcadia, IN

        Liberty… I think I understand you to say that you don’t think that Barry is Muslim? Really? He had a Muslim father. Doesn’t that make him Muslim?

      • Liberty

        you think religion is passed down like dna. It is not. you choose your faith or it chooses you. He was raised by his white family. Were they muslim no. They were Christians. He grew up in the Christian faith. You don’t dibble in it like witchcraft. Your in it or your not. Clearly he is Christian.

      • ValDM

        In the Muslim world that’s exactly how it is. Look it up and get yourself smartened up a bit. His Daddy was a muslim, his step-father was muslim. O-man attended muslim schools and lived as a muslim in Indonesia. How much more do you need??? Also, he brought a whole slew of muslims to the WH to have prayer with them (about 50K of them). How about that bowing thing in Saudi Arabia???

      • JUKEBOX

        He was not with his grandparents until he was almost a teenager. Until then he was educated in a Muslim school in his young, formative years.

      • http://naver sook young

        Actually, he was raised in Indonesia by his muslim step father, went to a muslim school, and attended mosque. How he is a Christian, I don’t know. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • Eddie47d

        20 years of going to church in Chicago. Were your relatives in Korea always Christian or were there a couple of Buddhists thrown in? People do change and convert all the time.

      • smilee

        sook young says:
        March 10, 2011 at 6:52 am

        HE WENT TO A SECULAR SCHOOL IN INDONESIA, AND WAS ONLY THERE FOUR YEARS LESS THAT A FOURTH OF HIS BRINGING UP TIME SO TO SAY HE WAS RAISED THERE JUST SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE. HE WAS NEVER TAUGHT THE MUSLIM RELIGION. FOR A PROFESSED CHRISTIAN YOU SURE DO NOT HAVE A LOT OF AGAINST LYING DO YOU, WANT TO EXPLAIN THAT TO US.

      • http://naver samurai

        Smilee and edduh, you two morons have to prove my wife wrong. Just like a lib, gay loving, baby killing, marxist to call someone a liar and have no facts or sources to back up what they are saying (smilee). There are many sites on youtube and others that support what my wife says. We sure the h*** aren’t going to do your homework for you. How about when Obama bin Laden went to Afghanistan? He went directly from Kenya. He was a young man at that time, so were do you morons get he came back around 10 years old? Secular school? Are you injecting yourself with interveinous drugs or what? Indonesia is a muslim, not secular, nation. This being so, how the h*** do you get a secular school? Cite your sources and state some real facts or don’t answer my post. People like you two give a bad example of this country. You understand the words comming from my mouth smilee (chris)? You’re not really too smart now are you? FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • smilee

        samurai says:
        March 10, 2011 at 10:06 pm

        YOU ARE NOT GIVING FACTS JUST REPEATING THE FAR RIGHT PROPAGANDA RHETORIC THAT IS NEITHER FACT AND CERTAINLY NOT TRUE, BUT THEN FACTS ANT THE TRUTH HAVE NEVER BEEN IMPORTANT TO YOU!!

      • http://marcum1@wildblue.net coal miner

        Bull crap!

      • smilee

        NO, HE WAS RAISED CHRISTIAN AND ONLY SEEN HIS DAD ONCE AFTER AGE TWO, MANY PEOPLE DO NOT FOLLOW THEIR PARENTS RELIGION, MANY DO IN HIS CASE HE FOLLOWED HIS MOTHERS RELIGION AND YOU SAYING OTHERWISE CHANGES NOTHING!!

      • http://naver samurai

        Actually he followed his step fathers religion (islam). Stop repeating the same lies. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • smilee

        SAMMY

        HIS MOTHER WAS NOT MUSLIM AND SHE AND GRANDMA RAISED HIM CHRISTIAN. YOU ARE THE LIAR, SELDOM ON HERE TO YOU TELL THE TRUTH, I GUESS IT IS NOT A PART OF YOUR CHARACTER, ON SECOND THOUGHT YOU HAVE NO CHARACTER!!

      • Doug

        Really here is a man who went to a church for 20 years that spewed nothing but hate for America. Denied that he is good friends with a domestic terrorist who by the way wrote most of his books for him. Go ahead show me something a piece of paper anything showing us where he was born what his grades were, how he got into Indonisa when no American were allowed to travel there. Anyone who knew him in College, high school anything come show it to us! You really need to learn what goes on in the world before you show your ignorance for all to see!

  • tim

    He has broken many laws

    • Doc Sarvis

      And what recent President has not?

  • Donald Winters

    The foretold Beast of the antichrist is alive and well and completly on tract and is in the white house today, don’t believe it, within 12 months you will.

    • karolyn

      Unbelievable that people like you exist in this day and age! Open your mind a little. Let some sun shine in!

      • Mike in MI

        Karolyn -
        Don’t worry about what he penned up there. Obama can’t be the Beast or The Antichrist. When hedoes come he will put Obummer’s evil to shame. THAT dude will blow your mind for horrid.
        If you don’t die in prelims to his time you will worship him then.

        Of oourse, one of the things Jesus Christ believed to accomplish was to get you out of that dilemma. Decide to make him your Boss (Lord) and tell God with all the conviction can muster that you believe God raised Jesus from the dead. There wasn’t that easy?

  • spitfire

    I have a better idea. At least a crowd of 2 million of us decend on the US capitol, drag that dirt bag out side and hang him from one of the trees on the lawn.

    • Liberty

      spitfire.. lol you are a laughable chump. you are hiding behind you computer with you potbelly stained wifebeater. frantically typing away in your trailer with your 30 cats stewing in your hate and wallowing in your ignorant filth to say such things like this. What i just said can not be as bad as what you said about a black man.. shows that you still have the intelligence of a toddler and a penis to match.

      • ValDM

        WOW! What a civil response. Without even a hesitation. I’m in awe of someone who can spew vitriol so effectively. I guess the O-man’s plea for civility wasn’t for the likes of you. Take a pill and get over yourself.

      • Liberty

        I am very civil. I have used my words effectively (they may have hit home because what I have said is true.) I have not been over there to whoop his ass yet. So I would say that I am very civil.

      • Marlene

        You certainly sound like Charlie Sheen who is certifiably insane – can you say “Winning”?

      • JUKEBOX

        Michelle has managed to keep Barry’s fondness for penises a secret with her intimidating threats. As for the hanging, I disagree, because we do not need another half black man to be sanctified.

      • http://naver sook young

        Childish. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • Doug

        Stop hiding behind the color I find people who like to yell racist are usually the biggest racist! What we people don’t like about this idiot has nothing to do with skin color the fact the he is and illegal allien, Muslim and a communist!

      • http://naver sook young

        You sound like an immature little man named chris. Does your mother know that you’re playing with her computer? Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

    • smilee

      PLEASE AIR OUT YOUR POINTED WHITE HAT AND WHITE SHEET BEFORE YOU DO SO IT DOES NOT SMELL OF MOTH BALLS!!!

      • http://naver samurai

        Why don’t you take out your scarlet and black uniform, jack boots, and practice saying “seig heil” to Obama bin Laden in the mirror. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

  • Michael R. Hopkins

    Where’s the Birth Certificate and School records of Obama, alis Barry Soto.
    Impeach this clown!

  • Ellen

    Whether or not you support gay marriage, Obama’s actions are wrong. He does not have the authority to make this decision and, by making it, has failed his presidential pledge to uphold the laws of the US. He should’ve been impeached when he sued Arizona for writing a state law to enforce our federal law. Imagine all the additional damage he can do by 2012 if we don’t impeach him first.

    • James

      Ellen, Amen!

    • Liberty

      This is for those of you who just HATE that this man is OUR president.

      Take a look at this. It is rare but not uncommon that presidents have decided not to defend a law..

      NOTABLY YOUR RePUBLICAN MESSIAH REGAN!!!

      * Bob Jones University v. United States 461 U.S. 574 (1982)
      In this case, the IRS had denied Bob Jones University tax-exempt status based on its history of racial segregation and discrimination, which it claimed was religiously based. The Reagan Justice Department declined to defend the decision in Court and filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the University.

      http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/presidential-decisions-not-to-defend-the-constitutionality-of-federal-law-a-brief-history/

      • Doug

        Yes I hate Muslims and communist which Obama is all of the above. I can find a bum on the street who could do a better job than this non working American hatting piece of crap!

      • Mike in MI

        Doug -
        At least the bum would be less likely to do things that are designed to ruin the economic base upon which we all depend, put out the fire of our energy sector, use the Department of Justice to obliterate the force of the legal system that assists in a smooth flow of the business of living or give aid and comfort to those who are our sworn enemies – unless, perchance, he were one himself.

      • tim_

        Liberty is this the only thing you can do is to refer to a case of
        Bob Jones University v. United States 461 U.S. 574 (1982) Something that took place 20 years ago? The current administration is degrading this country and driving the bus over it’s people.
        Mrs. Obama should stay out of the public’s business of what food is healthy for people to eat or not. Just like her husband she doesn’t have any credentials to be dictating what the people eat.
        He sure ttok an about face as soon as Nancy was taken out of the big picture…show us your credentials Mr. President or get out

      • Liberty

        @tim. I can refer to more that is why the this link is here!!!

        http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/presidential-decisions-not-to-defend-the-constitutionality-of-federal-law-a-brief-history/

        The referral to the Reagan decision was just to show that this is not a liberal thing. Also, that Obama was not the first to do it. So impeachable I don’t think so. I know it is not. So finally read the article (assuming that you can read) and see that he is doing his job and that is defending the constitution and the people that are covered by it.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        tim,
        He did a real quick about face on GITMO as well. WAIT, COULD IT BE? A LIE, TOLD BY THE NOBUMMER?!?!?!?!?

      • http://naver sook young

        Must you really repeat yourself? President Reagan is dead and Obama is the president now, so please try to come back to reality. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • smilee

        Being dead does not change what he did when he was alive. UNBELIEVABLE STATEMENT!!

      • http://naver sook young

        OK, then that means that LBJ is still responsible for illegaly taking money from social security. FDR is still guilty of making the Great Depression go on longer than needed. He also increased the size of government, which is unconstitutional, and tried to get us into World War 2. It’s even been proven that he made it so the Japanese would attack this great nation and kept our patrols at a low level so we would be attacked (The Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor.). That would also mean that former presidents that haven’t died are also still responsible? Clinton being impeached for lying and parading around Washington with many girlfriends? How about Clinton bombing an aspirin factory in Sudan and abandoned camps in Afghanistan? How about Clinton not doing anything to go after terrorists after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the U.S.S. Cole bombing, the Kobar Toweres bombing, the U.S. Embassies being bombed in Kenys and Tanzania? How about Carter with his Fair Housing Act and Clinton with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? These acts lead to the downfall of our housing markets. How about another democrat named Andrew Jackson and his treatment of the Native Americans? How about Woodrow Wilson and the Federal Reserve Act? If your prepared to debate me, you have to be willing to look at both sides. Actually it is you that is the ignorant one here. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

    • smilee

      Ellen

      “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” It says nothing about the laws made by Congress and as the Constitution trumps the laws made by Congress and if in his opinion he believes the law is not Constitutional he must then defend it and not the law and in this case that is so and he is doing what is required of him and your not agreeing with his decision means nothing as it is not your call and if in the end the SC agrees with him he will have been proven to have made the right decision. My observation here is that not many on this site do understand the Constitution and it is clear you do not. Quit twisting the oath to read laws when it does not!! Thank you!!

  • Tim L.

    If your marriage needs the support of the president and congress in order to survive, guess what? Your marriage is already dead! Get over it!

    • Sven

      Hear, Hear!

    • http://naver samurai

      The same would count towards the gays also. You can’t have it both ways, moron! FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robin from Arcadia, IN

        samurai…
        Excellent come back! And oh so true!

      • http://naver samurai

        Thank you fellow patriot! FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        Actually gays as anyone can tell so far will divorce at similar or slightly lower rates than heterosexuals. There hasn’t been enough time to be conclusive yet, but that appears to be the trend.

        But even if ALL same sex couples were to searate how does that impact you samurai?

        MOF, best guess is that gays are 10% (all the Republicans aren’t out of the closet yet) of the population.

        The heterosexual population has a whole lot more divorce than gays ever will. So, are you going to tell Rush (3 wives), or any of the other hypotrical right wingers that they too are immoral?

        My guess is that they are forgiven and you accept their word like a bunch of “here here” at a church social.

        BTW, again because there are so many heterosexuals in America it is clear that they commit more “sodomy” than any other group. Why don’t you attack them and deny those Americans equality?

        Rob

      • http://naver samurai

        Robert, you’re being a moron again. I never said that they had less rights then we did, now did I? You say that heterosexuals commit more sodomy than gays? Now we both know that isn’t true. If you have two “gay men” (for lack of a better term) and they love each other, how do you think they’ll do it, hmmm? They’ll sodomize each other. Usually, sodomy is a crime dealing with heterosexuals. Gays 100% chance of sodomy, heterosexuals would be criminals or mentally impared (like rob). How do you know that 10% of the people in this nation is gay? Put up some real facts and a source or shut up and get to steppin’. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.

        Oh, I forgot to answer you on another lie about the gay gene. There still isn’t one, moron. Quit trying to make exuses for them and try to correct the direction this country is going. If you break down the family, then morals and ethics tend to fall apart afterwards.

      • Robert Smith

        So, samurai, if gays are allowed to marry you will divorce your wife?

        Please explain how two people you don’t know can impact your life.

        Rob

      • Moogi

        This isn’t reply to Robin so Robin don’t take this personnaly.
        In reading this blog for about five minutes I see why this country is on the brink of disaster. Going going and I belive gone.
        I don’t need any white sheets. I have moved away from the big cities where the death tole is going to be an expected 90% over the first year of a total colapse. Also it’s the target of dirty bombs etc.
        I’m way out in the country in deep woods. I have provisiong to exist for over 3 years of no supplies in the stores and yes in spite of the dooms day fall out radiation I’ll survice a bomb that puts fall out all over the area.
        If you believe the BS shown in movies like, “on the beach etc” then go ahead and set idlly by and burn in gama radiation the few days after a nuke or dirty bomb. As a matter fact I’ll have food and water for a long time, and then after the fall out has disipated to safe levels, “yes it does fade away with time,” I’ll have a garden, eggs and fresh meat.
        If any of you liberal morons show up attempting to raid, for goods to survice on I won’t have a white sheet, I won’t be a racist etc but you will be dead, dead, dead! If I see any GAY trappings, dead, dead, dead whether raiding or not. If I see UN markings, dead, dead, dead.
        I’m an engineer in several fields, Chemical, Electronics and mechanical.
        I have a complete solar referigration system. No moving parts, no delicate solar cells etc.
        Via solar I do have a large sterling engine driving a generator.
        I have parts to rebuild it about 20 times if necessary.
        I have defenses most liberals are incapable of conceving.
        Remeiber the chemical degree…………
        Remember the electronic……………..
        Remember the mechanical…………….
        Some of each of the above skills are involved in almost each of my defenses.
        As a last resort if I’m overwhelmed by numbers I will auto destruct and a rather large area, “my secret” will become completely leathal to life for a few hours. Nothing that breathes will survive, none of the goods will be left for idiots like liberals.
        It’s mine, I worked for it and I intend to keep it even in death.
        No sharing the wealth here you liberal jerks. Just plane old I made it, bought it with my hard work etc. It’s my money,supplies etc. If you are so stupid as to be forced into taking from others to survice due to your stupidity then come here, YOU WILL NOT SURVICE!

      • Robert Smith

        Yup, another death threat from the extreme right: “If I see any GAY trappings, dead, dead, dead whether raiding or not.”

        How christian of you Moogi.

        Rob

    • James

      Tim L., Marriages, in America, were and are performed in churches. There was, and is, no requirement to obtain a state marriage license. The Bible defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman “these two shall become one.”

      • Liberty

        yes the Bible says this.. however.. there is a separation between church and state.

      • http://naver sook young

        That is an outright lie. Please show me the paragraph in the Constitution that says anything about separation of church and state. It isn’t there. Are you sure you’re not some middle school student with a bad education? You sound like someone I used to know and he was so ignorant that he had a “god” complex about him. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • smilee

        The Supreme court has defined the first amendment as separating church and state, what you say means nothing as your word does not trump theirs. Only simpletons like yourself would require your words to used before you can understand it.

      • http://naver sook young

        Sorry smilee, but you don’t need to call me names. I get you’re just an ignorant liberal that comes to this site. If you read the 1st Amendment, which I don’t think you have, you would see that the government can’t set up an official religion and cannot pass any laws prohibiting the free expression thereof. The Supreme Court has said this? Like you said, only an ignorant child would post such words without a source. Have you taken your medicine today? Are you still suffering from the prune and viagra diet your doctor perscribed for you? Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • Robert Smith

        Sook says: “Sorry smilee, but you don’t need to call me names.”

        No need for samurai to call people names either.

        Thanks for the clear demonstration of the double standard from the extreme right.

        Rob

      • James

        Liberty, I believe that’s what I said. The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” State constitutions contain similar restrictiions.

  • Dave Carr

    You’ve got to be kidding…with all the crap that’s going on in the country and the world right now…. This one politician is still focused squarely on the big gay peril. Give it a rest already and concentrate on the real issues, needing urgent and immediate attention. Inflation, the wars, job creation, government corruption. Everyone’s efforts would be better served.

    • James in NY

      Amazing isn’t it. And what’s the American legion doing sticking its nose in as well. What about the thousands of gay Americans who have served this country so that we can continue to have our freedoms. Is there no freedom for gay Americans. Hypocrisy at the extreme.

      • http://naver samurai

        They have the same rights as are given to us by God. Just have to marry someone of the opposite gender. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Mike in MI

        James in NY – Sure, the gays have all the rights any others of us have – within the laws.
        Liberty has never been defined as licence to encourage licentiousness; but laws are enacted to maintain order, promote the well-being of the greatest numbers possible and lubricate a decent smooth flow of life that keeps everybody off of everybody elses toes. If every little splinter group shows up demanding the right to do whatever their hyperactive imaginations can devise…then, wipe the laws off the books and let everybody do whatever, whenever , however to whomever they damned well please.

      • Mike in MI

        P.S. – Then we’ll go back to the law of the jungle. But then, isn’t that why a lot of libertarians and progressives are also anarchists (if you scratch the surface paint off)?

      • marmoolaki

        Mike,
        1) how marrying someone with the same sex, jeopardizes your marriage?
        2) Rule of jungle is who has power will rule. This is not America.
        3) Honesty what is in your life that you are soooo unhappy. Pls try to fix that instead of taking your frustration on others.

      • http://naver sook young

        Marmoolaki, we both know that gay marriage destroys morals, ethics, and the traditional family. The family was one of the Christian beliefs we were founded on, so how can you support a lifestyle that is this destructive to our nation and can cause our nation to fall apart like Rome, Greece, and so on? Please cite a source and state some facts and stop posting rhetoric and inuendo. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • Robert Smith

        From sook: “Marmoolaki, we both know that gay marriage destroys morals, ethics, and the traditional family.”

        Really. “Morals” are most often a religious thing. We all know how corrupt your hateful god is. All those floods and destroying a couple of cities (I still wonder that “Gamority” is.)

        MY ethics are that people who love each other should be able to have the same conract that anyone else declaring themselves to be a couple in the CIVIL blessing of our government. Remember, even atheists can marry.

        “The family was one of the Christian beliefs we were founded on,”

        Is that why it was mentioned in our Constitution? Can you quote such a claim in our founding document? Otherwise please admit your lie.

        Sook you ask: “how can you support a lifestyle that is this destructive to our nation”

        How so? I haven’t seen ANY OTHER nation brought down by gays. The one that shines though is Hitler who simply killed them. Do you agree with Hitler sook?

        More from sook: “can cause our nation to fall apart like Rome,”

        Rome lasted 800 years and tolerated most religions until they started pushing religions upon those who didn’t want it.

        From sook: “Greece, and so on?”

        Ummm sook…. I’ll break this to you as gently as I can.

        GREECE is still around after a couple of thousand years. Maybe you missed it in your version of history.

        And then you ask: “Please cite a source and state some facts and stop posting rhetoric and inuendo”

        Really? You dare ask such when you post that Greece was destroyed by gays? Another lie from the right.

        BTW, look what followed Rome. The christian church grew and exerted control over populations through and assortment of tactics. Inquisitions anyone? How’s ’bout an good long Dark Age.

        Rob

  • Robin from Arcadia, IN

    Of all the issues that would seem to be impeachable issues, it seems like at least one of them would stick!

    • Tim L.

      And what issues are you refering to exactly?

    • smilee

      KEEP ON DREAMING!! CAUSE THAT IS ALL YOU ARE DOING

  • http://none norm

    We must get rid of this traitor before he continues on his distructive path of the disrembering of America.
    Why the hell do we have a Congress and Supreme Court and what is wrong with them?

    • Sven

      I like the way you Troll, sir

      • http://naver samurai

        Why? The man is right, moron! FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        There goes samurai again. No cogent argument, just name calling.

        So much for reason from the extreme religious right.

        For goddess and America.

        Rob

      • Mike in MI

        Sven -
        There is a “norm” who often comments here and has been strong for liberal theology. I don’t know if this is the same commentator or not. But if it is, his step over to this side of the line-in-the-sand is strong evidence of the grave danger and awful consequences Obamaism represents. More and more, people of reason and principle are realizing things must not continue in the present direction or chaos is in the offing.

  • Forrest

    The President’s and the Justice Department’s refusal to defend the DOMA is DERELICTION OF DUTY. Only the Supreme Court of the United States can decide the constitutionality of the law. The President’s decision is the result of implementation of “royal law”. Mr. Barak Hussein Obama has established himself as the new “KING” and he will make decisions as to what is legal or not.

    Yes, this is an impeachable offense.

    • James

      Forrest, Amen!

    • Liberty

      no it is not impeachable.. read this. even your messiah Regan did this same thing.

      Bob Jones University v. United States 461 U.S. 574 (1982)

      In this case, the IRS had denied Bob Jones University tax-exempt status based on its history of racial segregation and discrimination, which it claimed was religiously based. The Reagan Justice Department declined to defend the decision in Court and filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the University.

      http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/presidential-decisions-not-to-defend-the-constitutionality-of-federal-law-a-brief-history/
      Reply

      • Mike in MI

        Li-bitter-ty -
        Well now…I’d say you had your chance – then – to act against a president whose inaction you seem to think was improper. AND, it seems someone required them to file briefs defending their action. Subsequent to that no one had grounds or guts sufficient to take further action against his Administration.
        Well, today, in light of the seriousness and the on-going damage to the nation’s safety, peace and continuity due to Oblama-lama-ding-dong’s serial offenses, breaches of his oath of office and service to our enemies someone is finally going to move…hopefully.

      • http://naver sook young

        Why do the liberals always bash dead presidents, but don’t want to correct the one we have now? Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • Eddie47d

        Your side goes after Lincoln,Roosevelt,Johnson . I do believe they are dead. We say one word about Bush who is living and you all get a rash.

      • http://naver sook young

        Sorry Eddie but you misread what I was saying to him. He said Reagan and not Bush. Also, Lincoln wasn’t a democrat. He was the first republican president. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • Robert Smith

        Hey sook, haven’t seen you lately.

        You said: “He said Reagan and not Bush.”

        Yup, Reagan did exactly what was posted about that right wing Liberty college.

        Why don’t you address that and come to the same conclusion that Reagan should have been impeached?

        After all, if it’s good enough for Obama it’s good enough for Reagan.

        Rob

    • smilee

      “Are you as dumb as you write????”

      • http://naver samurai

        Are you, moron? FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        There goes samurai again…

        How does he get such privelage?

        Remember: “…or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don’t stoop to name calling.”

        I consider being called a “moron” when I clearly am not to be slanderous.

        Rob

  • Doc Sarvis

    At the end of the article was the quote; Legion National Commander Jimmie L. Foster said that “we oppose all efforts to undermine, alter or otherwise corrupt the institution of marriage.”

    Seems like the divorce rate did that a LONG time ago.

  • http://rorels@sbcglobal.net Lita Z. Biejo

    Obama’s impeachment proceedings should have been started a long time ago and Obama should have been impeached already for all his misconducts and disregarding our constitution. He should not be just impeached but put in prison.

    • Sven

      Why? Because he has different ideals? When did our nation become so petty as to call a different view-point grounds for impeachment? Also, Obama has broken no laws, which makes imprisonment impossible, unless you want our nation to go down the path of tyrants and dictators.Do not be so quick to judge another. You probably do not carry any of the same qualifications Obama does when it comes to political office, which makes your absurd statements even more absurd. Nor can you presume to know the complexities, and pressure, of being president.You can get rid of him in about 1.6 years, so save the hot air for then. One of the faults of our political system is that, by having only 2 polarized parties, no one will ever be happy with our “progress,” if you can call it that, and will always find some stupid,irresponsible, and religiously biased reason for refuting it. All that sec.3 of DOMA does is stigmatize our citizens who happen to be different, this is reminiscent of Jim Crow laws. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This says that no matter what we are the same and should be treated as such. DOMA can be called unconstitutional because it infringes on liberty and can halt these individuals pursuit of Happiness. By that logic alone DOMA should be struck down by the supreme court. It’s like racism, but the Gay folk are the ones being oppressed now. Our nation has far more to gain by recognizing civil unions than by ignoring them, chiefly, we create a bigger tax base and can increase revenues by taxing Life Partners as couples. Besides, a lot of the anti-gay rhetoric and legislature out there comes from people who bring their religion into the picture, which is just wrong, because these are the same people who complain of being forced to go out of step with their beliefs, which is a major Hypocrisy, because they turn around and create religiously motivated legislation.

      • Tim L.

        BRAVO!

      • grannymae

        I could care less about the marriage thing, let them do what they want but he should certainly be empeached for going against the US Constitution so very many times and he is getting ready to do it again by signing the international green act. I don’t think you people have a clue as to what is going to happen when he does that so let me fill you in. We will no longer be a sovereign country. We will be under the thumb of the United Nations and they will tell us what we can and cannot do in this country. They will control the air we breath, the land we stand on and the ocean we fish and swim in. Any violation of UN or international law concerning those things can get you inprisoned and tried by a international court and you will not have the protection of our constitution like you have right now. You people better get your head out of you butt and stop argueing about Republicans and Democrats (they are one in the same now days) and start finding out where the rich and powerful are leading you. Once we become a part of the new world order you will then be a part of the communist government (socialist). The reason there is nothing getting done about the Mexican boarder is in the new world order there will be no boarders on the entire north American continent. The fastest way to force this country into the new world order is to bankrupt this country and put us so far in debt that we have no chance of ever getting out of debt. When you are cold from a lack of heating oil and hungry because there is no food in the grocery stores, because truckers can’t afford the fuel for their trucks, then maybe you will wake up and cry foul ! If I were you I would check out http://www.CoalitionConservatives.com and financially support them as much as possible. I know all you liberals are screaming bloody you know what but these people may just be the only hope to save your stupid a$$. You are about to loose your country and your freedom. If it happens it will serve you right. I can hardly wait to hear you all complaining when it happens. This stuff has been in the works since the 20′s and it has been helped along by both the democrats and the republicans. We as a people have been duped by both parties and that my friends is disgusting. Al Gore wasn’t pushing global warming just to get rich ( but that was going to be a great side perk for him) he was pushing you into the new world order! Isn’t he a great guy? Already the UN is pushing Obama into making the U.S. the police force in the middle east. Get ready people for your part in the war of armegedon, or the third world war if that is what you prefere to call it. The near future is not going to be nice so just get use to it. If you have had any brains at all you will have stored up some provisions to help you and your families in the near future, if you haven’t, too bad , so sad ! You can say what you want about this post, I really don’t care, I am ready and I will give you this last warning to get yourself ready, but understand this do not come my way if you let yourself get shut out in the cold, like I said I am ready ! Hope you get ready too!

      • Robert Smith

        From granny: “I don’t think you people have a clue as to what is going to happen”

        I want a clue but I just don’t believe you.

        Do you have any real informational sites we can see what you are claiming? You know, something like a copy of the treaty…

        I find it sad that you just don’t have enough credibility as far as I’m concerned. Please don’t take it personally. I don’t think anyone on the extreme right has any credibility.

        Why you might ask! The rich are getting richer. Our medical care is on par with Cuba. The price of gas at the pump isn’t going up because of a shortage. It’s going up because the very rich are trading oil futures knowing that someone will always pony up more because eventually they know we’ll pay the pain at the pump.

        Rob

        Rob

      • spitfire

        Sven Please eat Poop and die.

      • karolyn

        Wow! That’s really intelligent!

      • James in NY

        It shows the wingnuts have nothing of substance to say

      • http://?? Joe H.

        karolyn,
        i asked you a question awhile back and you never answered me so I’ll try again. Name what rights I have that the gays don’t? I can name a right they have that I don’t. The biggest one is equal protection under the law. How? If I beat the hell out of one of them and mention the word homo while doing it, I get years added on my sentence for a hate crime. If one or more of them beat the hell out of me and mention the word hetero, they won’t get any added time for a hate crime! That in NOT equal protection under the law and it is supposedly guaranteed!

      • Robert Smith

        Awww joe, you’re playing your game again. Repeat your alleged “question.” The fact that you vaguely refer to a question without supplying information about it is at best disingenous and more likley in my humble opinion a deliberate effort to discredit from others who actually have a valid point. Why do you rely on tactics rather than facts?

        Now I’ll answer your often repeated question AGAIN. Here we go. You ask: “Name what rights I have that the gays don’t?”

        The ability to file a joint federal tax return.

        The ability to to visit any of your family without anyone denying that. Gays can be banned from the hospital room if the “family” denies their presence.

        Gays can’t join the local swim club, golf course, or any other group that offers a “family” rate. They each have to pay full price. Your fqamily gets it, why can’t theirs?

        Gays can’t get social security or military benefits. Your family gets it. Why can’t theirs?

        You’re big in your inquisitions, aren’t you joe?

        And finally I’l answer the one where you feel “hate” crimes should be…

        It’s like lynchings, joe. If someone is harmed because they are hated for being who they are it guarantees that there are other hateful things being done to folks. Hate is NOT a family value and it should be discouraged. Sadly not all families teach their kids that all Americans ARE equal and should be treated equally under law. Hate crime laws drive that point home in an environment where the attackers are slow learners.

        When blacks, gays, jews, or any other minority is attacked simply because of who they are it IS a second crime. That’s why we have hate crimes. If people aren’t put away because of hate for infractions against minorities then the odds go up that they will eventually set off a bomb or some other such evil. So, it’s better to keep them off the streets for a longer period of time.

        It’s not like those dumb laws about harming a fetus come in. You cliam it’s a “baby” but it isn’t a baby anymore than an acorn is a tree. Yet I’ll bet you approve of extra penalties for injuring a fetus. Such hypocracy.

        Rob

        Rob

      • marmoolaki

        See spitfire,
        You guys dont have “rational basis” so what remains is insulting.
        Do you really think you will win in court.

        That would be a great defense strategy. when they ask you to present facts and express your logic, you can say “GO EAT POOP” :) )))))))))

        And you really call yourself religious?? Which GOD you worship?

      • Robert Smith

        I’ll bet they worship the same god that Fred Phlps and his “god hates fags” troup of monkies follow.

        After all, they all claim to be christian. AND! They deny folks like Bishop Spong and deny that he is a christian.

        Rob

      • http://naver samurai

        If we did recognize them, then they would be able to get benefits from the government. That is one of the reasons for the Defense of Marriage Act. You say that the gays are being supressed? They’re the ones trying to force their immoral and unnatural lifestyle on us. Why is it when our soldiers come home and have a parade, but have a darn gay pride parade afterwards it is OK, but if you have a group of Christians that go to a gay pride parade and sit about 50 meters off to the side praying getting arrested, this shows who is really the group being suppressed here. Remember also, behavior is not mentioned anywhere in our Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. If you want to know what the majority of Americans think about gays, just read Leviticus 20 verse 13 and Romans 1 verses 26 – 28. Stop riding the bandwagon for these immoral fools that just seek to help bring down this country. “As goes the family, so goes the Empire.” Augustus Ceasar. Destroy the traditional family, you destroy the nation. All these things that you and Tim have stated are just rhetoric with no facts or sources to back them up. Typical lib, gay loving, baby killing, marxist nonsense. Go home and don’t come back till you two grow up and get lives. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • eddie47d

        Good post Sven, equality for all Americans not just a select few. Heterosexuals have nothing to fear but fear itself.

      • Liberty

        Gays are destroying families and the moral values between a man and a woman.. now there will be no men to marry women.. if gays get married.. marriage will be destroyed.. because now gays will climb into the beds of the heterosexuals and sleep in between them so they can not reproduce.. and then the heterosexuals will be turned into homosexuals.

      • karolyn

        WHAT????????

      • eddie47d

        I think Liberty has been sniffing the real fairy dust!

      • Liberty

        you see this was absolutely absurd, what i just said.. I was trying to see what their argument would be against same sex marriage. lol

      • eddie47d

        Liberty; Gotcha.

      • http://naver sook young

        I think liberty has forgotten to take his meds today. Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • liberty4me

        samurai:

        “They’re the ones trying to force their immoral and unnatural lifestyle on us.”

        When … where? I’m nearing 70, have traveled the world, lived in several countries, and have never been approached in any manner by a gay person even suggesting, let alone forcing, any alternative life style on me or anyone else. But I could not count the number of times I have been verbally accosted by born-again Christians who believe everyone is a sinner and demanding I change. I survived combat in South East Asia, fighting for freedom and the ideal of personal liberty for all. I firmly believe those who would deny liberty for anyone (excepting criminals) has no right to liberty himself… There seem to be many opinions expressed here that would deny liberty for many who think and behave differently. The hatred among us (Democrats/Republicans, Right/Left, Christians/others, Gays/ Straits, Liberals/Conservatives, etc.) will destroy us from within. These distractions enable and empower our enemies.

        Let’s focus on the real problem THEFT of OUR FREEDOM and DISMANTELING of OUR CONSTITUTION by a government out of our control. The retaking of OUR Government (BY THE PEOPLE) will require the cooperation and mutual, organized effort of ALL AMERICANS.

        Put an end to the petty decent.

      • marmoolaki

        Liberty4me,

        Who is forcing you their moral ???
        IF YOU DON’T LIKE SAME SEX MARRIAGE DON’T MARRY A PERSON WITH THE SAME SEX.

        and if from the bottom of your heart you wanna marry a person with the same sex quit blaming it on US and try to embrace yourself, there is nothing wrong with you, relax life is beautiful.

      • Robert Smith

        They are scared that they can’t teach their kids not to be gay. After all Chaney’s daughter turned out to be a lesbian. How can Dick Chaney blame himself (nature or nurture) for an outcome like that? It must be the gay people who make more gays. Dick just won’t take responsibility for his daughter being gay.

        Rob

      • grannymae

        samurai,

        It won’t be long and they will find out what it is going to be like to spout off about gays and such , when we get forced into the new world order ! I wonder what the stance on gays will be then? I wonder just how much freedom they think they are going to have then? Me thinks they are in for a big surprise ! I saw a show the other night called the new world government and it was almost like a documentary and what an eye opener. The guy that made it was a retired news reporter and an older man and he had been in a lot of press conferences and has put together all the things that have gone on in his life time up to now and compared them to the bible and it was unreal ! He has news clips of people and in their own words the things said that are now coming to be! I’m going to order the DVD so I can let my family see it. I think you can look it up on the internet under the new world government or you can call 1-800-endtimes. It is quite impresive. Seeing that and knowing what has been going on in the news of late, all I can say is get ready for all heck to break loose ! I don’t know if it is even possible to pull our country back now. Obama has really done a number on us and either all Washington is in on it our we have some very stupid people in office ! In your words, FOR GOD AND COUNTRY !

      • http://naver samurai

        Good post Granny Mae! If the NWO will be like people say, then they’ll practice totalitarian tactics. This will mean imprisoning or killing anyone who is different from the way they believe. These morons should understand that all regimes like these have had gays shot for being gay, so what have they earned? FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        From Granny: ” I wonder what the stance on gays will be then?”

        Gays will follow the example of that republican “conservative.”

        Their stance will be very wide and hypocritical.

        Rob

      • Robert Smith

        From samurai: ” They’re the ones trying to force their immoral and unnatural lifestyle on us.”

        When you say “us” I presume you are following the same hateful god that Fred Phelps is following.

        BTW, don’t include me in your “us.”

        Why don’t you just go off to your little church and worship your hateful god and leave the rest of America alone?

        Rob

      • James

        Sven, The purpose for the Executive Branch of the national government, is to execute the laws enacted by the Legislative Branch. Presidents take an oath to do that. If a president is allowed to ignore the laws he disagrees with, or thinks they are unconstitutional, he has replaced the functions of the Legislative and the Judicial Branches. That’s empiricalism.

      • karolyn

        He’s not not-executing the law.

      • James

        Karolyn, If he’s not not-executing it, doesn’t two negatives make a positive? Doesn’t that mean he IS executing it, when he said he wouldn’t?

      • JUKEBOX

        No, that is Obama Chicago style dictatorship, agree with it or pay the consequences. Got a dead fish lately?

      • smilee

        WTF Are you as stupid as you write??

      • smilee

        James says:
        March 9, 2011 at 8:51 am

        WRONG!!! “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” It says nothing about the laws made by Congress and as the Constitution trumps the laws made by Congress and if in his opinion he believes the law is not Constituional he must then defend it and not the law and in this case that is so and he is doing what is required of him and your not agreeing with his decision means nothing as it is not your call and if in the end the SC agrees with him he will have been proven to have made the right decision. My observation here is that not many on this site do understand the Constitution and it is clear you do not.

      • Robert Smith

        Further: Bush didn’t enforce the laws that could have saved America from his depression. Why weren’t they screeching to get George back out on the street?

        Rob

      • James

        Smilee, That’s the silliest thing I’ve ever read. The U.S. Constitution created the federal government, it has no laws in it. It empowered Congress to make laws by delegating certain powers to it in Article I, Sectiion 8. The Executive Branch is supposed to execute the laws that Congress enacts pursuant to the Constitution. And the sole authority to declare such laws unconstitutional rests in the Judicial Branch, that is, in federal courts and ultimately in the U.S. Supreme Court.

      • http://PersonalLibertyDigest AZ-Ike

        Sorry Smiley,
        You are the one who does not understand the Constitution. The 3 branches of government, Executive, Legislative and Judicial are separate, but interdependent. If Obama does not believe DOMA is constitutional, it is his responsibility to submit a lawsuit to the Supreme Court for their decision. It is NOT Obama’s right to decide the constitutionality of a law written by the (significantly bi-partisan-in this case) Legislative branch and signed by the Executive branch during the administration of a previous President. He is, in fact, breaking the law if he does not support an executed law of the country.

        This is only one of many Constitutional responsibilities and laws Obama has broken. The first and most egregious is campaigning for and occupying the Office of President as a Constitutionally ineligible candidate/president. The enormous fraud he has perpetrated on We the People is enormous and frightening. Obama’s stated goal has been to change America from a federal republic to a socialist state. His goal has always been to destroy the Constitution and bring the great nation of America to its knees.

        One of the above replies stated it was tyranny for homosexuals)to have DOMA in place. Tyranny is a man acting as President and subsituting the rule of man (Obama’s rule) for the rule of law (Constitution.) The first act of the new Republican Congress should have been to demand eligibility proof from Obama. Barring their cowardly inaction, Impeachment is long over due.

      • Liberty

        This hits right on the nose. DOMA is unconstitutional. This is impedes on the rights of others. Civil uniions!! You ever heard of “separate but equal?” This was struck down because it is not EQUAL. Equal rights are guaranteed under the constitution for ever citizen of America. Who are you to tell someone they can not get married? the only way this will work is if you make being gay against the law. Let me tell you.. that aiint gonna happen.
        It says in the bible that homosexuality is wrong.. but that would say that the state is allowing the church to dictate how to live.. but who’s church? The Christians, The Jewish, The hindu, The catholic, The protestant, the Muslim etc.. Which one should the government follow.. This is why church is separated from the state.
        The institution of marriage.. Cheating spouses, women beaters, High divorce rates.. and the gays are the ones disrupting the institution of marriage?? Get over yourselves this is a movement that is gonna happen..

      • Vincent

        We should let Islam rule our country since they are the religion of Peace and they are already starting to change our laws. Watch out because Islam doesn’t consider homosexuality a way of life to them it is a sin punishible by hanging. Up until 1979 most people thought homosexuality was a mental disorder. This was true until the homosexual lobby started infiltrating the field of Phsychology so they can remove homosexuality as a mental disorder. Now the lobby has moved into every facet of State and Federal Government so the can force acceptance of their choice of sex parnters. Hey if I said that I am a dog living in a mans body everyone would think I am crazy but when a guy says he is a girl living in a mans body we are supposed to accept that as a sane person. I am not saying that gay people are not capable of maintaining a normal life quite the opposite they are very powerful and smart. That is the only reason for the striking down of DADT and the decision not to defend DOMA. I would like to see the war between the homosexuals and the Radical Islam because they are both fighting to take over the USA.

      • marmoolaki

        Thats a great compliment Vincent.

        It shows we worked hard to remove it from mental disorder by funding research and hard work. THANKS A LOTTTTT

        Lets see if you can put it back as dis-order? :) ))

        I again want to appreciate your compliments :)

      • Mike in MI

        Vincent -
        Someone may not be mentally disordered when he decides to start that behavior. But, after a while with fair frequency of entanglements one’s mind becomes broken down by the selective death of brain cells.
        The cause is the actions in a man’s body (not a woman’s, her system is set up for it) of certain chemicals designed to facilitate conception after normal relations. But in male-to-male (I refuse to say man-to-man) some results are immune destruction and a spectrum of madness from neurological damage and cell death.
        I can’t fathom why medicine doesn’t cknowledge what they know – except that they make a lot of mney treating th problems that arise.

      • marmoolaki

        Mike,
        it should be hard that you need to come up to such a laughable finding.

        Honey Psychologist, sociologists, doctors history experts dont agree with you.

        If you are right pls share your research with American mental institution and ASA so they can put homosexuality back as a mental dis-order until then pls shut up and respect the experts.

        By the way, I believe you mental condition need therapy.
        The comment and disease you just explained just shows how delusional you are!

        PLS ask for help. gay marriage will come sooner or later but that’s a fact. You should start to cop with it. for your own good not anybode else’s.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        marmalooki,
        show me proof that the “gay gene” exhists, that isn’t disproven by other research!!

      • http://naver samurai

        Marmoolaki, there is NO GAY GENE so get over telling those lies. Just by saying something over and over again doesn’t make it the truth. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        samurai says: “there is NO GAY GENE so get over telling those lies. Just by saying something over and over again doesn’t make it the truth.”

        How do you know samurai? Why don’t YOU get over spreading lies?

        Remember, there was a day when christians believed that a whole babies were sent down the urethia into the woman to gestate. Now we know that only half of the DNA comes down the pipe. They were wrong then. BTW, they had no clues about DNA whatsoever. Yet it is real.

        BTW, if it isn’t a gene then how did Dick Chaney’s lesbian daughter come from? I’m sure Dick Chaney didn’t encourage their daughter. Oooooo, I get it… They are gonna blame her misadventure on others.

        My my, a right winger not taking responsibility for things in their lives. Yup, looks kinda hipocritical to me.

        Rob

      • Robert Smith

        Liberty asks a right winger: “Who are you to tell someone they can not get married?”

        They think they have the authority to force their beliefs about their brand of christian “god” upon other Americans.

        THAT is un-constitutional too.

        Rob

      • wandamurline

        When Mexico has invaded the US with illegal aliens, Obama and Holder are NOT enforcing the immigration laws…in fact one of the few responsibilities given the federal government (many have been overstepped already) is that they must defend America from invasion of a foreign country…when you have over 12 million illegal aliens in this country from Mexico, that my friend is an invasion. Not only have they aided and abetted the invaders, they even filed suit against the people of Arizona for attempting to do the job they are unwilling to do plus they allowed Mexico to file suit also. That is against Article IV, section IV of the constitution and an impeachment and treason action. Then they won’t enforce the law of DOMA, refuse to enforce civil rights laws because the victims were white, and refuse to stop Obama care after a federal judge has told them to do so. These people feel that they are above the law….no wait, they feel as if they are the law. Well, they are not. They both need to be under investigation for their crimes against America….and while we are at it, we need the real birth certificate and passports from the 80′s. All will come out eventually, as eleven states have passed laws that state the presidential candidates must file the proper paperwork or their name will not appear on that state’s ballot…so sooner or later, Obama is going to have to submit his papers, then we will all know. I know that there are going to be a lot of disappointed people when they can’t come up with the birth certificate…as his new governor friend in Hawaii in an attempt to help put this to rest for Obama, stated he couldn’t find it…but then the news medias stopped all interactions on his statement. Once we find him inelligible for office, all laws will be null and void that he has signed…he will go into history as the only president elected to office that was black and inelligible for same.

      • paul

        Well said.

      • Ellen1

        You’ve nailed it again, wandamurline! Well said.

      • Mike in MI

        “wandawoman” to the front of the class -
        Everyone, show appreciation, please.

      • marmoolaki

        and your point is??

      • Mike in MI

        Marm -
        point is probably unintelligible to someone in your mental state.

      • marmoolaki

        Sorry Mike,

        I didnt quite get you.
        It seems our friend Vince and you are not in stable mind.
        she seems that she is gonna pass out of anger. should I call 911??

        + seriously who is talking about passport and ….

        Discussion with you guys is not even interesting. There is no logic on your side that can challenge, it is just bible and hate!
        THIS IS HOW YOU GUYS KEEP FLUNKING IN COURT.

        and honestly it is not that you are doing a bad defense. you are defending something that is not defensible! Sorry if i went above your head.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        marmoolaki,
        Prove the long form exhists!!! The short form was issued to people to recognise that there was a live birth, we know he’s alive, we aren’t arguing that point!! Show me the long form birth certificate!!!!

      • http://naver samurai

        Joe H., if the governor can’t find it then it doesn’t exist. Just another lie by the traitor’s side and not the patriots. They can’t prove it and will never be able to prove it. They just haven’t taken their geritol yet. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        joe h. goes off again: ” Show me the long form birth certificate!!!!”

        Show us one from where YOU think he was born.

        After all there is paperwork, witnesses, and newspaper reports of his being born in Hawaii. As you discredit the facts with lies and bogus demands you have offered zero proof that he was born elsewhere.

        So, joe… Can YOU come up with any proof otherwise?

        Rob
        Rob

      • grannymae

        wandamurline,

        Yaaaaa! great post !

      • Robert Smith

        from wandamurline: “when you have over 12 million illegal aliens in this country from Mexico, that my friend is an invasion.”

        Why didn’t Bush do something about it?

        When did it come time to blame Obama? When it was 11,999,999?

        Reagan solved the problem with amnesty. Why shouldn’t Obama do the same thing?

        BTW, why do you punish kids who have been here all of their lives by denying them citizenship? Punishing the kids for the sin of the father? Some of them can’t even speak spanish.

        Rob

      • mrbill

        About that qualifications stuff. He has never held a private sector job. He was a community organizer (Wow) and two whole years in the Senate.

      • karolyn

        And???

      • smilee

        Community Organizer is a private sector non profit job it is not a government job as you infer!

      • http://naver samurai

        He was definately not working for free. He also was groomed by Jerimiah Wright, Saul Alinsky, and Bill Ayers. He’s also been on this path for a long time, at least 20 years, and Michelle probably also keeps him in check. So who was paying him, hmmm? It may not be an official government position, but he was getting paid. Remember, even Hitler and Stalin started off as organizers also. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Edie

        Your comments revolve around whether the DOMA law is a just law, and are based on your personal views. The call for impeachment is based on the constitutional requirement for the POTUS to enforce the laws of the US. Whether you like it or not, DOMA was passed lawfully and is now the law of the land. Obama is required by the oath he took to uphold and enforce the law. Anything else is grounds for impeachment!
        If the POTUS is allowed to pick and choose which laws to enforce, we’re in a bigger MESS than I thought.

      • smilee

        Wrong!! See my post above that contains the oath and it says if he believes it Unconstitutional he must not defend it

      • http://naver samurai

        That’s the SCOTUS that determines something to be unconstitutional or not, moron. The president doesn’t have that ability. Its the job of the SCOTUS, not the president! FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        There you go agian, with your special privelage from this website,
        calling people names again.

        Seems to me you have no facts and just want to insult (apparently from some of the remarks I’ve seen from the extreme right abound here maybe even physicaly harm people).

        Rob

      • Dan

        Obama should be impeached because he is supposed to enforce our laws and follow the constitution of the US

        He has not, repeatedly

        immigration
        DOM
        Healthcare Law (defined , by a Fed court as unconstitutional) and he’s still going with it vs stopping (as he is supposed to, by law)

        Next he’s a liar, and he’s racist

        read his books, listen to his statements

        Jeremia Wright, His pastor, 20 years, I didn’t know he was a radical bigot? right…

        He’s a radical, socialist who doesn’t have any intention of following our constitution, he wants social justice and group salvation

      • Robert Smith

        Dan says: “Next he’s a liar, and he’s racist”

        Do you mean like samurai? Whenever someone disagrees with him he goes on and on about how they are a “moron.” That is easily proven that samurai is a liar.

        Easily proven. Moron as defined is an IQ of 20-49. Actually the percentile varies depending upon which test you take. An excellent example is seen in the various tests and the scores required for a high enough IQ (top two%) to get into Mensa.

        That is at: http://www.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScores/QualifyingTestScores/QualifyingScores.htm

        And to prove him to be a liar: Those who he is responding to (including myself) have easily demonstrated facility with the English language, sufficient ability with a computer to actually post things, and making complete statements that are well documented.

        I’ll continue to point out the racist remarks from samurai and his alleged wife as I see them. I’m sure you can find some on your own if you look.

        Rob

      • http://charter howe

        The personal attacks against each other make no sense and are futile. We are all different and each of us expects to be individually treated with respect. As to the argument, if you think about it, its about having loyalty and respect for the Constitution and the laws of the land. That is how everyone gets to enjoy the freedoms we have in the greatest nation in the world. The Congress is elected by we the people to change and fix what we need them to legislate to make our lives safer, happier and more secure. The socialist democrats in the Whitehouse and the Congress have created a massive amount of unrest and devisiveness and many of us have swallowed the bait. That is the Salinsky method of divide and conquer when you want to kill the free market and create a big govt Marxist ideology. I am not paranoid, I spent almost 29 years in the military and I have been in dozens of countries that were plagued with bizzarre ideologies and most were worse than the sh_thole country of Mexico. So enough of the vitriol and show up to take your country back on 2 Nov 2012 so we don’t become embroiled in the crap Greece, Spain, Libya etc are going through.

      • Robert Smith

        From howe: “when you want to kill the free market and create a big govt Marxist ideology”

        As opposed to corporate greed that has moved more money out of the middle class and seen it go to corporate things like Enron…

        The choice you are proposing is:

        1. Give the money to greedy corporations who have very little accountability (Do you really believe Madof acted alone) and every interest in getting as much money as they can

        or

        2. Government where at least we get to change things through elections once in awhile…

        Rob

      • WALTER

        Talking about bringing your religion into it, you would be the type of person who thinks Sharia law would be acceptable. You have to give everyone equal representation after all.

      • Bloodhound

        Obamabi has broken no laws? LOL, where have you had your head buried? Allowing thousands of weapons to be sent to Mexican Cartels, under the pretense of busting American gun runners, is one thing. His slow, dumbass response to the oil spill, the refusal to prosecute the Black Panther Scum for Voter Intimidation, how many more you want? Get your nose out of Husseins butt long enough to see the truth.

        Allen West 2012!

      • Moogi

        When his disagreeing with the law of the land it isn’t a problem. When he takes action that is against the law of the land, it is a crime.
        He has enacted more laws and rules that are a violation of the Constitution than most of the other presidents combined. Only Clinton has committed a crime of treason higher than Obma.
        It is treason to not uphold the oath of office. It it treason to make laws or do unconstitutional acts. Obama has done all the above many times.
        Clinton also but not as many time but Clinton sold our ICBM guidance system to the Lippo group. TREASON ANY WAY YOU LOOK AT IT.
        Sure you liberals with mumbo jumbo BS around it.
        Liberals are known for lying and deceit. It’s just the kind of people who become Liberals so it’s no surprise that lying is OK with Liberals.
        Frankly I’ve begin to think lying so normal for Liberals they think everyone lies. Nope it ain’t that way.

      • Bill

        what qualifications did obama bring to the presidency? Can you name some??

      • Rick Watson

        Why Sven, because he was elected to uphold the laws of the United States, not to interpret them or only choose the ones he likes. I say put the Ba—-rd in jail where he belongs!

      • Ken

        Why? Not because of his Ideas, because he’s not enforceing the law of the land and Hes not a Natural Born Citizen. Which means Mother and Father must be United States citizens and have no alliance to another country. Impeach the son of a Kenya father Now

    • Tim L.

      On what grounds? Just because you didn’t vote for him doesn’t justify impeachment proceedings.

      • http://naver samurai

        Many of the legislation that he had passed is unconstitutional. Also, he cannot prove if he meets the eligibility to be president according to the Constitution. These 2 things are enough. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • James

        Samurai, Presidents don’t pass legislation, they either sign it into law or veto it. When he signs it into law, he is then obligated to enforce it, and if he fails to do that, it’s impeachable offense.

      • http://marcum1@wildblue.net coal miner

        James,

        Right on target.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        James,
        100% correct, and DOMA was passed, without veto, into law and he has stated he will not enforce nor defend it!! therefore he is non-compliant with the constitution!! Impeachable offense!!! The immigration laws have been passed without veto, and he refuses to enforce it and is non-compliant with the constitution, IMPEACHABLE!!!

      • smilee

        JOE

        “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” It says nothing about the laws made by Congress and as the Constitution trumps the laws made by Congress and if in his opinion he believes the law is not Constituional he must then defend it and not the law and in this case that is so and he is doing what is required of him and your not agreeing with his decision means nothing as it is not your call and if in the end the SC agrees with him he will have been proven to have made the right decision. My observation here is that not many on this site do understand the Constitution and it is clear you do not.

      • Robert Smith

        Hey samurai!

        Why don’t you come up with a birth certificate from where ever you think Obama was born.

        Anything… You haven’t offered a scrap.

        You know, try finding something like a certificate of birth, maybe a bit in the paper of the town, or maybe some real live people who say he was born there.

        Rob

      • http://PersonalLibertyDigest AZ-Ike

        Sorry Smiley,
        You are the one who does not understand the Constitution. The 3 branches of government, Executive, Legislative and Judicial are separate, but interdependent. If Obama does not believe DOMA is constitutional, it is his responsibility to submit a lawsuit to the Supreme Court for their decision. It is NOT Obama’s right to decide the constitutionality of a law written by the (significantly bi-partisan-in this case) Legislative branch and signed by the Executive branch during the administration of a previous President. He is, in fact, breaking the law if he does not support an executed law of the country.

        This is only one of many Constitutional responsibilities and laws Obama has broken. The first and most egregious is campaigning for and occupying the Office of President as a Constitutionally ineligible candidate/president. The enormous fraud he has perpetrated on We the People is enormous and frightening. Obama’s stated goal has been to change America from a federal republic to a socialist state. His goal has always been to destroy the Constitution and bring the great nation of America to its knees.

        One of the above replies stated it was tyranny for homosexuals)to have DOMA in place. Tyranny is a man acting as President and subsituting the rule of man (Obama’s rule) for the rule of law (Constitution.) The first act of the new Republican Congress should have been to demand eligibility proof from Obama. Barring their cowardly inaction, Impeachment is long over due.

      • smilee

        AZ

        Boy are you so full of BS and so confused I actually do think you think you understand the Constitution which you certainly do not. All laws that congress makes has to be covered under the constitutional or it is unconstitutional and until that is decided it should not be defended. You did say that there are three independent branches of government and the Congress cannot dictate to the president what he is to do nor visa versa but the courts can and sometime I believe they will ON THIS ISSUE and if the President is supported by them then he was right. WHAT IN THE CONSTITUTION HAS HE NOT COMPLIED WITH, FACT HE HAS COMPLIED. IF HE HAS NOT DONE AS YOU WOULD LIKE IT DOES NOT MEAN HE HAS NOT DEFENDED THE CONSTITUTION. YOU CONCLUDE IN YOUR SIMPLE THINKING PROCESS HE HAS NOT, BUT AS USUAL YOU ARE WRONG!!!

      • BLUEEYESOL

        DOMA just happens to be the law of the land right now and Obama and Holder are under oath to defend that law. Change the law if you don’t want it, by proper channels and authority, but until then, it is the law of the land and as such, the President and his Attorney General are obliged, under oath of office, to uphold, protect and defend that law. To not defend the law of the land is an impeachable offense and neglect of duty and breach of contract of their Oath of Office. Period! He is also breaking this same oath by not defending our borders, again which is the law of the land at present. So, until the law is changed, they are under oath to defend the law.

      • Liberty

        This is for those of you who just HATE that this man is OUR president!

        Take a look at this. It is rare but not uncommon that presidents have decided not to defend a law..

        NOTABLY YOUR RePUBLICAN MESSIAH REGAN!!!

        * Bob Jones University v. United States 461 U.S. 574 (1982)

        In this case, the IRS had denied Bob Jones University tax-exempt status based on its history of racial segregation and discrimination, which it claimed was religiously based. The Reagan Justice Department declined to defend the decision in Court and filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the University.

        http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/presidential-decisions-not-to-defend-the-constitutionality-of-federal-law-a-brief-history/

      • Doug

        If you are such a law abiding citizen then the NAACP should be brought before the court for being a rasict oranization. Do you mine if I have WET TV how about the NAAWP is that okay with you.

      • eddie47d

        Doug; I guess you can watch Wet TV if you are a degenerate and like pimps and prostitutes. Knock yourself out!

      • Liberty

        @doug you are an idiot.. if you actually believe it is a racist organization. Naacp is to uplift and cry out against racism and discrimination. The Naawp is aka KKK!!!

      • http://naver samurai

        You’ve repeated this many times moron! FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • James

        Liberty, The issue in Bob Jones University v. U.S. (1982) was whether section 170 and 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, should exclude nonprofit private schools, that prescribe and enforce racial discrimination, from acquiring a tax-exempt status, when the law didn’t actually say that. The District Court held the IRS revocation of the University’s tax-exempt status, had exceeded the law’s scope and ruled for the University. The Appeals Court reversed, holding that racial discrimination is an understood disqualifier of that law.
        The Supreme Court agreed with the Appellate Court, and admonished Congress for not revising that law. There is nothing wrong with a president taking sides on such issues, when it’s in court.
        However, DOMA (1996) specificly excluded same-sex marriages from federal benefit rolls, there was no question what it meant. While I agree that federal courts would hold that part of the law (if challenged) unconstitutional, it is not the role of a president to do that. He must enforce the law as it is written.

      • smilee

        BLUEEYESOL

        “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” It says nothing about the laws made by Congress and as the Constitution trumps the laws made by Congress and if in his opinion he believes the law is not Constitutional he must then defend it and not the law and in this case that is so and he is doing what is required of him and your not agreeing with his decision means nothing as it is not your call and if in the end the SC agrees with him he will have been proven to have made the right decision. My observation here is that not many on this site do understand the Constitution and it is clear you do not. Quit twisting the oath to read laws when it does not!!

      • Robert Smith

        Looks to me like you just don’t like the actual Constitution being on this forum.

        After all, it disproves any claim that Obama must fight for a law that he believes to be un-Constitutional.

        BTW, if the SCOTUS shoots down the DOMA will you accept it or claim that they are ligislating from the bench when they toss it out?

        BTW, how can it be called “legislating” when in fact what they are doing is removing un-Constitutional laws?

        Rob

      • smilee

        Robert Smith says:
        March 10, 2011 at 9:32 pm

        wow!! you make no sense at all!!

      • Robin from Arcadia, IN

        Tim L..
        There is still that little matter of the birth certificate….

      • Tim L.

        Robin,
        No, that little matter only exists in the minds of morons. Not knowing the truth about a matter is understandable, even forgivable. The Birthers, however, refuse to acknowledge the truth, and that is neither understandable nor forgivable: They are simply a bunch of demented, morons who don’t give a damn about this country. They only care about their hatred!

      • http://?? Joe H.

        If it is just that I am a moron, dumbazz, then show me the long form birth certificate!! Proven fact states that the short form had been issued in the past to non-residents to show a live birth!! SHOW ME THE LONG FORM!!!!

      • JUKEBOX

        I can do something that Obama can not: I can show my long form birth certificate in less than one minute. I still want to see his passport from where he returned to Hawaii from Indonesia.

      • http://naver samurai

        God and Obama bin Laden have no birth certificate, but God doesn’t think that he is Obama bin Laden. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • Robert Smith

        Hey Joe, let me remind you that this is America. Why do you violate the notion that one is guilty when proven guilty. NOBODY has offered any proof that Obama is guilty.

        Show US a birth certificate from somewhere else. Don’t have one?
        Then there is no proof.

        Show us a clipping from a local paper.

        Have someone say that they were born somewhere else.

        Oops, nothing presented so far.

        Rob

      • Moogi

        Nope I didn’t vote for the criminal. Didn’t vote for his health care law either.
        Oh neither did a full congress or senate vote on it. That’s unconstitutional and treason.

    • Bill

      I said this very thing, when that muslim got elected to office. He and his wife is so anti-American, and anti-White.

      • karolyn

        I have not heard an anti-American word come out of either of their mouths. You sound more anti-American to me!

      • eddie47d

        Yes Karolyn the sheets and hoods are coming out. Bill is a prime reason I won’t vote on the right.

      • Tim L.

        eddie47d,
        AMEN!!!

      • smilee

        DITTO

      • http://?? Joe H.

        how about ” For the first time in my life, I am proud of my country”? If you don’t think that’s anti-American, then you must be an illegal alien!!!

      • http://naver sook young

        Maybe Michelle is also from Kenya? Thank you.

        Sook Young
        Wife of the Samurai

      • smilee

        Joe

        P;ease explain what is anti American about that statement, you must not believe in the freedom of speech, DOES THAT MAKE YOU ANTI AMERICAN???

      • http://naver samurai

        Let’s go over this again smilee and the rest of you lib morons, “An American shall have the right to speak out against their elected officials without anything happening to them. This freedom of speech shall not be taken from any American.” Verbatim from the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Now you tell me how what she said and you lib morons are saying that falls into that category. Remember, we weren’t founded on “if it feels good do it” policy. FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!

      • JUKEBOX

        Actions speak louder than words. I do not remember Roosevelt bowing down to Hitler, Mussolini or Hirohito, and he was a liberal Democrat. I don’t remember Lyndon Johnson bowing down to Ho Chi Min either, but this so called Intelligencia has bowed to some of the worst world leaders since Genghis Khan. I am beginning to believe that he may be bowing down to check their package.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom