Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

Palin’s Popularity Dips Following Liberal Attacks

January 21, 2011 by  

Palin's popularity dips following liberal attacks  Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin has reached new levels of unpopularity, according to a recent survey.

The latest CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll shows that 56 percent of Americans have an unfavorable view of the former governor of Alaska, which is up seven points from a survey that was released before November's midterm elections. Palin, who is considering a run for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, has been the center of controversy following the Jan. 8 shooting in Tucson, Ariz. that left six people dead and 14 wounded, including Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.).

In an attempt to link the Tea Party to the tragedy, some Democratic lawmakers and Left-wing commentators have accused Palin of spewing violent rhetoric toward her political rivals. Many liberals have expressed outrage over graphics that were used on Palin's website last year, with claims that the images were crosshairs targeting congressional districts.

However, columnist Neal Boortz of TownHall.com recently challenged those accusations. Boortz provided a link to a government-sanctioned website that proves that the symbols on Palin's map actually resemble surveyor's marks more than crosshairs.

Furthermore, Boortz included maps that were previously used by the Democratic Leadership Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. In these graphics, several symbols are scattered throughout the country that look like bull's eyes, which are more commonly associated with weapon targeting. 

Personal Liberty News Desk

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Palin’s Popularity Dips Following Liberal Attacks”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Floridagrammy

    If anyone can provide one speech or interview where Palin didn’t speak her hate and violence rhetoric. Since the day she stepped onto the stage at the GOP convention she has spewed hate, violence and lies…24/7. Just show me one speech or interview where hate and violence are not included and I’ll back down. Until then my feeling is that Sarah deserves all the negativity she’s received since the massacre.

    • Doc Franklin

      So name one. I want to hear the lies, I want to hear the hate speech she spews. Since she does it 24/7 since she’s been on the political stage, this should be easy for you. I’m certain you have no animus towards Sarah simply because she intelligent, articulate, well educated and certainly not because she is quite attractive and sexy (unlike your favorite Democratic icons like Pelosi, Sotomayor, Napolitano et al).

      • smilee

        HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO ANYTHING HAVE YOU!!

      • Doc Franklin

        Alright genius, let’s hear the litany of charges!

      • JeffH

        …lol…

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Chirp, Chirp, Chirp!!! sounds of silence!!

    • patriotpartisan

      Granny, your Depends are too tight, apparently… ur getting very crabby! The Left spun this shooting just minutes after as a Right wing action; if that’s NOT irresponsible, then I truly pity u Lefist ass-hats!! The shooter has been clearly linked to ur warped side of the political fence, where commie ideals are celebrated and taught as social norms or status quo for those who “care” about others; all the while u libtards have no problem blaming a person for another’s actions. Despicable!!!

      • http://deleted Claire

        Depends? How crude and disrespectful. If you live long enough you may have to wear them yourself.

      • Doc Franklin

        I guess that just “Depends”, now doesn’t it!

      • http://deleted Claire

        Doc Franklin–Yes, it just “Depends.” I stand by my comment. I am not a person that will “back down” to anyone or anything.

    • JeffH

      -grammy, but not my grammy…want to see some Palin “hate”?
      Here it is!
      http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

      • Ian Burton

        And that is useful?

        I will ALWAYS condemn ignorance on either side, but you can not address it with hate.

      • JeffH

        Ian Burton, did you open the link and view the content?
        The content is very useful and exposes the hypocrisy of the very same people crying “foul” who have been accusing Palin, the Republicans, Tea Party and conservative as being hateful and advocating violence.

        Every liberal/progressive needs to take a long look at that information as a reminder of who they really are. Maybe then, we might start seeing a little more civility but I’m not holding my breath while I’m waiting.

      • eddie47d

        Not again Jeff!! You love shooting yourself in the foot. Is this the 6th time now??Both Sides spew bile;are you ever going to understand that or do you have a learning disability?? Back to Glenn Beck: Joked about poisoning Pelosi,would condone murder of Michael Moore,and has openly endorsed violent revolution. Now we don’t want to get into Ann Coulter and all the other loose lips now do we. It’s both sides Jeff! Now do you get it?? or are you just enthralled with spreading more manure over and over and over!

      • JeffH

        eddie, Polly want a cracker? bbbaaarrraaaccckkk!

      • eddie47d

        That’s what I figured more manure and silliness.

      • JeffH
      • eddie47d

        If you get any denser Jeff they’ll have to make a brick wall out of you. At least you’ll be of some use.

      • JeffH

        Brilliant. Eloquent. The output of an obviously formidable and probing mind.

      • libertytrain

        Jeff – well said, was thinking similar thoughts.

  • Stan Lee

    I’m located in a traditional Democrat-controlled city. I have been to many political gatherings, either out of personal choice or curiosity regarding “the other side.” Not wishing to hurt anybody’s feelings, but having been in the crowds, having witnessed the obscene shreiking against Sarah Palin, I could not help but conclude that homely women are just plain jealous of her.
    Up close and personal, I was impressed by her appearance and demeanor. She’s beautiful, smart, and down-to-earth, no snob is she. And, Mrs. Palin is a real Mom and wife. She may or may not ascend to the Presidency, that’s up to a nation,not Democrats or CNN, but she’s no phony and I’ll bet she can produce her birth records and all else requested of her.
    You Democrats keep on voting for “mystery candidates,” that’s what you’re about, I like my candidates with all that they are on the table.
    We are not playing that game, “Queen for Day” with our nation’s future!

    • Ian Burton

      It is true, it seems that both sides have been far too marginalized in their beliefs, and perhaps one thing that can be taken from this whole fubar ordeal is that we need more moderation in our discourse. The shooter was not politically motivated but we have hopefully been given the insight that we have been to extreme.

      After all, what is civil service without civility? If the people take steps towards moderation, the politics will surely follow.

    • Doc Franklin

      You’re right, jealous, fibonacci ratio challenged, vertically and gender challenged, synaptic deficient things masquerading in the Democratic Party just can’t stand the fact that no one wants to see them on a calender.

    • http://?? Joe H.

      stan Lee,
      Very good post and I’ll tell you one more reason I admire her. I have a handicapped son, and I know what it takes to take care of him. the cost in money and and physical endurance are quite staggering. I don’t wish for pity from anyone as I love my son and wouldn’t lose him for anything on earth but it is a very trying life and I suggest anyone that doesn’t think so go to their local special needs school and volenteer for a week, take that week and multiply it by three, then add to it a modicum of heartbreak then you might START to have the barest idea of what it’s like!

      • JeffH

        Joe H., God bless you. Your son is very lucky to have you as his father.

        I can remember how certain nasty liberals started attacking Palin and her children on this website way back when. Everything and anything they could make up they’d post. It was despicable and very personal, without any knowledge except what the media told them. It really opened my eyes to the deep hate that can overcome some people, particularly the liberals.

      • Doc Franklin

        Joe H. Although I don’t know you, I have tremendous admiration for the parents of handicapped and special needs children. The investment of time, money and emotion is immense. Not only does it bring you much heartache, it also brings a special joy that only a parent of such a child can truly understand. It takes a unique and dedicated person to provide the care that these children must have. I can’t help but think of Kim Peak and his father, what a special bond they have. Neither could enjoy life without the other. You will have many days ahead filled with pain and joy. I sincerely pray that God will bless you, your child and your family in an exceptional way and that all of your hopes and dreams for your child come true.

  • Sierra

    If you carry a handgun, you’re a pussy; end of story.

    • Bruce D.

      If every one carried a handgun you can be sure conversations would be much more respectful. Gun safety and use of a fire arm should be a priority in any free society.

      • Lewis Munn

        Works very well in Switzerland. The anti-gunners conveniently forget this!

        Wonder why when we have the good results of a real large-scale social experiment to display?

        There was a cartoon a while back, of a village where everybody was armed. A newspaper reporter was asking how they could allow this, with all the trouble it would cause?

        The reply was, “Who would start trouble in here?”

        Too true to be funny, too.

    • patriotpartisan

      “handguns are for pussies”; police and military carry them, and when those “pussies” aren’t around to protect you from the “nuts” who murder indiscriminately, then who’s “man enough” to stop a bullet… you? Another gun owner, that’s who, u pathetic liberal jerk-off!!

    • JeffH

      Wow, that was a revealing comment! One baseless comment?

    • http://?? Joe H.

      Sierra,
      your motives are so childish it isn’t funny!! you hope to provoke someone into saying something violent to try to prove your point! such bravado is quite manly for someone as skirt-swishy as you!!

  • Stan Lee

    I see a writer has mentioned the term “gin up,” as though this is a tactic common to Sarah Palin. Sure, when one has become so left-wing media-driven as to look forward to attacking Sarah Palin whenever and for the most contrived reasons! Such a reaction comes as no surprise, we know how you all operate!
    It’s been common knowledge and was related to Sean Hannity by Bob Beckle, a life-time Democrat strategist, that all campaigns in which he’s participated used symbolic targets, crosshairs,etc. to indicate where campaigns needed to concentrate efforts. There’s nothing new or peculiar about it.
    It is so myopic for one side to lambast the other over such an issue.
    But, when you’re living for the moment to demonize another person or Party, then we end up with such CNN polls, upon which left-wing minded people are willing to stake their integrity. CNN can hardly report accurate news!
    If you have a preoccupation that drives you insane that Sarah Palin inhabits a portion of this earth as you do, you have a real mental problem.
    The Republicans, Tea Partyers,and the many Independents that have sided with the Right, will choose their own candidates.
    You leftists and Democrats should be concerned with fielding what you think is decent, you really have nothing but incivility to contribute to Republican choices. You have already revealed that you are inferior judges of all that is decent. Just consider what you have elected!

  • Roland Kiesow

    Why don’t you libs just leave this democratic country & go to Europe where socialism isn’t working? That seems to be the life you want to live. The Az. shooting is way out of proportion, along with the remarks made by the news media & Dupnik, or Dope Nick! Sara had as much to do with it, as I did. This country is headed in the wrong direction in many ways, & the democrats & libs will blame the conservatives & patriots for the downfall of what once was a great, God fearing nation. Then Oboma can say, how do you like me now! Wake up people!

  • rjim

    Isn’t funny how people can’t handle the truth, which in my mind is that Sarah is a very real and strong person and she has my full support. The Democrats/Liberals/Socialist Party is destroying both the American culture and this great country. I feel sorry for our kids.The last place of Liberty in this world is fading fast.

  • http://google.com mathilda

    What poll? I did not recieve one! And if I did I would vote for her! She is not the problem. I talk like that also, and I don’t see anybody out shooting going to shoot someone. The liberals are looking for a scape goat. And they think if they can hammer Palin, then she might not run for president. Well, you people out there look at another case fox news talked about the other night on a bulls eye, and it was a liberal cause, and they had a bullseye and a smiley face and they won’t take it down either. Will someone blame them if something happens? Oh NO! Seems you people do not see the light. We need someone that is willing to stand up for the people and quit bad mouthing the ones that are trying to keep our constitution together, and keep us from terrany. We need to stand together and get someone in the white house that is going to stand up for the people and keep america free.

    • eddie47d

      This issue has been brewing for years and quit awhile before Obama or Palin were on the scene. Both these “characters” have made ridicules comments and should have zipped their lips on more than one occasion.The anger is mostly aimed at talk show hosts and newspaper pundits who sprew their bile. I know,the money is too good for them to stop and we all get a kick out of their Shock Therapy. If that is what you want then it will continue. It’s kind of like pornography or violent videos. As long as there is easy access to to these venues they will get used. It’s not all bad but can be addictive. On the issue of Obama using the Tucson tragedy to score points the argument get’s rather lame. Any President should be expected “to use” a tragedy and it really can’t be helped. In 1986 Reagan “used” the Challenger tragedy as a back drop and rightfully so. Clinton did in 1995 with the Oklahoma City bombing and Bush certainly did with 9/11. They all showed respect in a difficult period and we shouldn’t expect anything less.

      • I hate Jane Fonda!

        The Oklahoma bombing was precipitated by events which are never mentioned by the left.Why is that?I do not condone mass killings but I dont condone mass idiocy either.Thats what you get from the media and the press,mass idiocy….when will people look between the lines of the newspaper and wake up?Sheesh!

  • JKO

    The shooter is a nutcase. His supposed favorite books were the Communist Manifesto – left wing – and Mein Kamf – right wing. No one is to blame but him.
    All of us are faced with this c–p daily and very few shoot people.
    Sarah nor Barry nor anyone else can be blamed for this.
    As for Sarah I find it very interesting (as a conservative woman myself) that the first conservative woman who is placed as a VP candidate is so vilified, especially by other women. Is it because she has the audacity to stand against even those in her own party who go against things like the party line and, oh I don’t know the Constitution.
    Could we list specifics that she has done wrong. Putting cross hairs or whatever on a website is political rhetoric and nothing more.
    Finally, when Obama said something about “if they bring a knofe wwe bring a gun” and talked about kicking someone’s ass (his word) where were all of you then?? This is a viable bunch of rhetoric as well. Should we blame him for the shooting?? No. it’s Loughner’s fault and no one else’s.
    AND it was liberals that turned the memorial into a political moment with T-shirts etc. I have never been so pissed off as when I saw people running with big grins on their faces because they were going to see Obama. This was about the victims and people turned it into a circus. The bummer for me is that I live in AZ and had to see it a LOT.
    You want to talk about shame on America this was a case of shame.

    • I hate Jane Fonda!

      First JKO,I offer my condolences for the treatment by our government of the state of Arizona.Secondly though we do not necessarily agree on the mental condition of the shooter,I will say that for others to politicize the tragedy is quite dangerous.My opinion is rampant on this board and though I may be considered ineffectual by others,I tend to witness through peaceful motive.My intent is to educate,not incite,even if I am hard edged.The liberals arent concerned with the truth when commenting on Mrs.Palin,but are busy “poisoning the well”,a technique which(in spite of a former poster that I will not mention)is often overlooked as a staple of the left.If there are enough negatives spewn out about her then they believe it will doom her prospects of any kind of political future.It has nothing to do with their “supposed search for truth” in the matter.Lastly the Obamantion will make anything he does seem like its the blessed coming of the Messiah.They are more concerned with imagery than with character.Did you ever notice that their Presidential choice is a media whore?Dude is seen way too much for this American.What happened to seeing presidents basically only when something important is happening?He has been coddled into celebrity because that is what the left wants,someone to mold as they see fit.Shameless and laughable if you ask me.

      • eddie47d

        No, We were kept in the dark on many occasions under G Bush and he pulled the wool over our eyes a few times. The American people begged Bush to be more transparent and open. He was neither. I agree Obama doesn’t need to be in the limelight so much. You don’t have to agree with him but at least he let’s you know it’s coming.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        eddie,
        Yeah wright! Just like “I guess we’ll have to pass it to see what’s in it”! just like all those closed door meetings after he promised that they would be on CNN!!! Gee, my TV must not have been working that day!! sorry dude, I don’t fertilize my garden till about March!! Send me that BS then!!

      • JeffH

        Joe H., eddie is 1/2 right(err..left), Pelosi did say the “we’ll have to pass it…”comment.

        BUT and it’s a big BUT…Obama did promise transparency AND lied and: Addressing President Barack Obama at the GOP retreat Friday, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asserted that the president reneged on a campaign promise to broadcast all health care debates on C-SPAN.

        Bottom line: While many hearings and debates have been broadcast, key informal conference committee discussions – where any deal between the House and Senate will ultimately be brokered – are not open to the public or media, giving credence to Chaffetz’s assertion.
        -CNN’s Emma Lacey-Bordeaux

        see obama/C span make this promise
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Api4fUziAnI

      • JUKEBOX

        Obama is about as honest and truthful as John Gotti was, no wait, I think Gotti was more honest.

      • eddie47d

        That was Pelosi who said that Joe. You need to get your facts straight before inserting shoe!

      • http://?? Joe H.

        eddie,
        If he didn’t agree with it, then why didn’t he correct her on something as important as his healthcare(?) act???

    • Doc Franklin

      The “memorial service” was filled with hand picked Obama supporters and it disgustingly played like a political or Oprah Winfrey rally. You have to understand the deep seated psychological needs of Obama to understand why this had to be a rally for him, and why he has to plaster his face all over the television every single day. He never got the strokes he needed as a child growing up. Both parents abandoned him and he was raised by his grandparents during the most critical formative years psychologically. He was placed at the knee of Marxists and radicals who by his own admission, became his surrogate father figures. Because of this large emotional whole created by being a “black” child in a white world, where his primary emotional support abandoned him, and the sympathy this generated in those around him, his self esteem was blown way beyond his accomplishments, he was never told no, and false adoration was showered upon him, in an attempt to make up for his real parents indiscretions. This created his deep seated narcissism and superiority complex. Because of this, he truly believes he is superior to everyone else on the planet and that he is infallible. His own perception of himself is that he is a god. As a demigod, he believes he deserves to be worshipped and in fact he demands that he be worshipped. This of course is the psychological makeup of many familiar historical figures such as Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Kim Jong Ill, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Jim Jones and others. I can assure you his deepest desire is not just to be the loved and worshipped “benevolent” omniscient and omnipotent dictator of the United States, but the first dictator of planet earth. Laugh and chide if you will, but this man is more dangerous than you can possibly fathom and his tolerance for those that don’t share his vision of himself, if given a chance, will cease abruptly.

      • smilee

        DOC, YOUR PATHETIC!!!

  • http://bjwholmes@verizon.net bjholmes

    If we all had the couarge that Sarah Palin has, we would have a much stronger nation. We don’t! We (someone) elected as a leader, the enemy of the people. Now what do we do? Obummer is in no way as exerienced as Sarah Palin as a leader. Nor does he want to strengthen our nation. Instead, he plans to destroy our economy, then the rest should be easy. It is time to return to our faith in God who allowed us to have this nation in the first place.

    • JUKEBOX

      Most of these liberals, including Obama, would not be able to survive a week in Alaska, much like Kate Goslin when she visited Sarah, and she had an easy time by Alaskan standards.

  • Nikita63

    liberals as a rule are lying, duplicitous , two faced slithering reptiles and like the serpents they are, can never just commiserate
    or feel sincere condolences for the Tucson Tragedy but have to make a major issue over Palin’s terminolgogy while uterly dismissing THEIR OWN. Keep in mind that the Daily Kos and Salon were openly advocating Palin’s MURDER and then later praying for her death over a long period of time by terminal cancer! What kind of copulating rectal cavities are those of the liberal persuasion? Im my estimation as a moral , decent, God-fearing heterosexual father of three grown college educated children, I wonder what the hell has happened to a once great country because of these demented demigogues? This common practice of never letting a crisis go to waste is just a euphemism
    for the typical Marxist ploy used to great effect against them by Joe MCCarthy in the early 50′s, known as the Smear Technique. Personally, I am outaged that such ugliness has come to represnt the deomcrats and progressive liberals in this country and their socialist welfare state mentality but more importantly, it is the vapid but unmitigated
    vitriol the Left is UNCEASINGLY spewing in volcanic volumes that has
    split us in to two warring factions, those of us who believe in the Constitution, the rule of law and American exceptionalism, faith in God and what was once considered morally decent as opposed to the perversion of the natural order. Rather than espousing death and denigration, liberals ought to look in the mirror and think for a few SECONDS! They might not like what the mirror reflects about THEMSELVES;but being social misfits they ARE, I DOUBT IT!

    • Ian Burton

      So the concept of agape towards your fellow man has left you?

      True theologians (and no I am not talking about money-hungry evangelist) understand that there is no evil in this world, there is really only ignorance in the face of God.

      Intellectualism should be something that is revered and rather than chastising and bastardizing the opposition in every way, attempt to have a logical, reasonable discussion.

      Anger is such a useless emotion.

      • ValDM

        Evil DOES exist in this world., and true theologians accept that tenet. As long as Satan rules this world, and until Christ returns to claim his property (he holds the deed) on earth, Satan will use anything and everything to blind, deceive and twist the truth until you can’t recognize it. Intellectualism has nothing to do with it. That’s why it’s called a “spiritual war”.

      • Karolyn

        There’s no such thing as Satan!

      • Stan Lee

        Karolyn:

        Then, we’ll have to disagree. The presence of Satan in people is the absence of God in them.

      • ValDM

        Since you’re a self-professed pagan, why am I not surprised by that notion?

      • Karolyn

        Val – I have never professed to be a pagan. Where did you get that from? Just because I don’t believe in your concept of God? Open your mind a little. And why would you care if I were a pagan? What’s it to you?

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        That’s his favorite trick, making suckers believe he doesn’t exist. Sucka !!

      • Karolyn

        Then he’s really gotten to you, Gunner, the way you talk!

      • http://deleted Claire

        Sucka? I think that word could be applied to a lot of people, left or right.

      • I hate Jane Fonda!

        1 Corinthians 1:28,NLT “God chose things despised by the world(thats you Ian, the reference to the world,not the despised part!),things counted as nothing at all,and used them to bring to nothing what the world (again you Ian)considers important.

      • Ian Burton

        The world is possessions, attachment to things that are far from God. It is true that one COULD view the world as evil, in so far as it is not God, but it is truly distance from God that is sin (the idea of Evil in the face of God assigns a value judgment, and as God is wholly transcendent, there is only Him). To suggest that I am one driven by this world, I will not refute this, I have struggled with things but I am trying each and everyday to detach and reach solidarity closer to God, and frankly I don’t feel like I need to answer myself any further to you.

        Read the Old Saints and Masters, Nicholas of Cusa, St. Francis, St. Augustine, St. Aquinas, and ESPECIALLY Meister Eckhart. I am truly sorry that you feel the need to express so much hatred, because that is in-and-of-itself attachment to this world. Remove images from your psyche and learn that there is only love Mr. Fonda.

      • ValDM

        Sounds pretty “new agey” to me. Read the Bible and know God. You can’t possibly know Him any other way.

      • Jana

        ValDM,

        You are right on. Ian is W A Y out in left field somewhere.

      • Karolyn

        Val – One CAN know God without the Bible!

      • Ian Burton

        Val I said nothing about disregarding the Bible, it is a very necessary tool that I believe was given to us by God. I could liken to what I was simply stating that I, and a number of very well known Christian Saints and Masters, believe that one must empty themselves of this world and of their self, so that they can be filled with God.

        There is nothing “New Agey” about what I said either, earliest person I cited was St. Augustine(~400CE) and the latest was Nicholas of Cusa(15th Century). Christianity in it’s base (Pre-Constantine) was a very different thing compared to the commercialism of Christ today.

        And beside that point, I’m not sure how one could defeat all this anger and animosity towards one another after [hopefully] reading the bible and [hopefully] identifying themselves as good Christians. People are going to have disagreements, as I am having one with you now, but I would never want to become angry over it, as letting anger in is letting this world in.

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        Karolyn; that’s not God you’re knowing. Sucka !!

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Ian burton,
        ” you must empty yourself of the world to truly know God”! Ok, then how do you know God if you are using a computer??? your computer is “of the world”!!

      • Karolyn

        Joe – That made no sense to me.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        karolyn,
        I didn’t expect it would to YOU!

      • Karolyn

        I can’t imagine it making sense to anybody but you Joe. It’s totally off the wall.

      • I hate Jane Fonda!

        The “I hate Jane Fonda” is a reference to how our military has been treated by the scribes.I dont know Jane Fonda in reality,but I do know that she will collaborate with communists and disparage our soldiers…evidenced by her willingness to do so.The scribes…one hardly needs to wonder why Jesus had odds with them.Politicians,Actors,Lawyers,Journalists….all part of the caste of scribes.Ever notice they flock to anti-God sentiment?I have a feeling its easy to tell why.Big money has its benefits,as well as power I suppose…but to deny God…is madness.But who needs God when you control the minds of so many,right?

      • Karolyn

        It just appears that liberals are more active than conservatives, never mind whether they are actors, actresses, lawayers, etc. Also, what Jane Fonda did was a long time ago; and I believe she thought what she was doing was right. Also, do you notice that it’s all the liberal actors and actresses who are donating their time and money to causes around the world? Or are the conservatives just hiding their light under a bushel?

      • Karolyn

        Thank you Ian. Anger only hurts the one who’s angry. I know people like that, and they are pretty damned miserable.

      • eddie47d

        There’s a boatload of anger floating around in alot of comments. Hope their ship doesn’t sink.

      • libertytrain

        Perhaps it would do well to look at our own comments and see if we too, are promoting these things. Sometimes it’s difficult to face the reality.

      • http://deleted Claire

        libertytrain–I agree.

      • Karolyn

        Claire & Liberty, Me too.

      • JUKEBOX

        If you don’t believe there is evil in the world, go spend a couple of months in one of our prisons, and then tell us that again.

  • Bob

    I still can’t believe how this woman scares the liberals.

    • I hate Jane Fonda!

      She can kick their asses….thats why.

      • smilee

        iF SO, THEN WHY DID SHE LOOSE THE ELECTION??

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Because of the worthless horses patoot she ran with!!!

      • Palin12

        dID yOU MEAN “Lose” the election, genius? Didn’t they teach you the difference between lose and loose union boy?

    • smilee

      I’ve got yet to meet a liberal who is scared of her, Most hope she wins the nomination in 2012 as they ee her as a sure loss for her party, so whats to fear!!!

      • Palin12

        OMG I thought we were rid of you after the thumpin’ the demoncrats took last November! Where have you been Smelly? Not that anyone missed ya.

  • J.M.R.

    i see the libs are still at it, believe the lying dick-tater over someone that tells like it is and the truth. GO SARAH.

  • James R. Maxwell

    Can someone explain to me since when did a Communist Nothing New ever amount to a hill of beans in the world sceme of things. The Left Wing, Socilist Liberals have a hard chill ever time the see Sarah because they know she would beat Obama in a race hands down. They will do ever thing they can to discredit her regardless of how low they have to go. Her openess, honesty and ability to talk to all Americans across the board is someting they will never understand and the fact that she enjoys live, firearms, hunting and is a pro-life person runs them up the wall.

    • Bruce D.

      You are right James. The left will never understand Sarah Palin. The only thing the left understands is government coming into their poor pathetic lives and saving them from themselves.

    • I hate Jane Fonda!

      Well-stated.

    • JUKEBOX

      The liberals are scared that Sarah might diminish their ever growing, self perpetuating bureaucracy, and they might have to find a job that produces something besides a larger debt.

  • eddie47d

    Palin’s popularity has been steady but not that great. Her books and TV show has kept her in the limelight: although her political knowledge still leaves a lot to be desired. She has a right to speak her mind but should also take responsibility for hurtful remarks or any actions she takes. The same should be for anyone towards her.

    • JeffH

      ” She has a right to speak her mind but should also take responsibility for hurtful remarks or any actions she takes.”

      Such a “middle of the road” comment. We all know where you sit eddie and it’s not in the middle. Maybe you could expound a bt on Palin’s hurtful remarks?

      Again, in case you missed it.
      http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

    • Lewis Munn

      So should you take full responsibility for incorrect and hateful remarks you emit. Here and everywhere else.

      • JeffH

        point to Lewis Munn…one up!

      • eddie47d

        Point it out Jeff for your loose lips are going to sink your ship. If you want to call someone a liar at least be man enough to back it up…..and not your old re-runs of Malkin again. Must be cartoon time for you kiddies. I can’t compete with your nasty remarks and I didn’t want to bring this up but you love playing the left right card. Glenn Beck on June 6th 2010 told his audience the only way to get rid of Obama and Pelosi is to shoot them through the head. I’ve heard others say the same thing about what he says so take your Malkin and put it where the sun doesn’t shine….and stop being a low life by trying to live off of right wing slime. What a pathetic shill! I’ve denounced the left wing garbage but you keep swimming in all the trash the right puts out.

      • JeffH

        eddie, you don’t like the facts so you name call and make things up to “suit your needs”. Did you not think I would research this comment from Beck? Did you insert the name Obama and Pelosi to suit your agenda?

        “Glenn Beck on June 6th 2010 told his audience the only way to get rid of Obama and Pelosi is to shoot them through the head”

        This is a bold faced lie, you know it and I know it…never said it, and yes, I read the transcript…on a progressive website so I could see it for what it was, then I went to the FOX archives and pulled up the complete transcript.

        ‘Glenn Beck’: Party’s Over for Democrats?
        http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,594343,00.html#ixzz1BLaeQ600

      • JeffH

        OH eddie, You forgot to provide the Palin talk you mentioned she was responsible for…or did you not have any?
        All of your hatefull name calling won’t make me stop correcting your mis-information…in case you hadn’t noticed.

      • eddie47d

        Sorry Jeff I read it too and watched the video. I’m no fan of videos but the written script did back it up. You can claim whatever you want.

      • JeffH

        eddie, of course you’ll deny that you made that story up. Like I said, anyone can read the transcript, if it proves otherwise they can step forward. You still haven’t provided the “hurtfull” talk from Palin either.

      • eddie47d

        Always trying to defuse the truth with your trashy lies aren’t you Jeff. You are worse than INSANE and you think you are so intelligent.Wrong again!

      • Doc Franklin

        I read the whole transcript as well and found no such comment or even one you could bend and stretch and distort to make it appear that way. I have to cry foul. We’re dealing with pure unadulterated fabrication. That is really not surprising though, as one of the tenets of the Liberal/Marxist mindset is: “Why tell the truth when a lie serves the agenda?”

      • JeffH

        eddie, I’m still anxiously waiting for the examples of Palins “hurtfull talk”.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        JeffH,
        That’s the problem with eddie parrotting the progressive party line. When one does that and has nothing to back it up, there is going to be someone, sooner or later, that has watched or listened to what he is trying to BS his way through!!!

    • JUKEBOX

      I never heard Obama take responsibility for any of the hurtful statements he has made, or his hurtful lies.

  • Jane

    Not true – she has been criticized for making herself look like a victim of the attack. Had Sarah simply come forward and stated that she sympathisized with the victims families – and that this was not the time to make the situation political – she would have come out of this whole thing untouched. Instead she made the tragedy a Sarah Palin pity party. She is the victim of her own bad sense of timing and taste.

    • Laurie, Haslet, TX

      No She is not a victim of the attack That is just another LEFT WING MEDIA NUT LIE

      SHE IS THE VICTIM of LEFT WING MEDIA insanity. Within minutes – the LEFT was SHAMELESSLY blaming her and the Right for this tragedy and continue to do so after it has BEEN PROVEN the man was not politically motivated at all. The LEFT keeps SCREAMING violent rhetoric on the RIGHT – all the WHILE DOING IT THEMSELVES! They have not stopped.

      While the RIGHT was praying for the victims of this tragedy – the LEFT was using it to further their ILLEGAL AGENDA.

      Yet the LEFT will not stop the LIES and you JANE are stupid to believe any of it.

      WAKE UP AND SMELL THE BS THEY ARE SHOVELING!

      • wanda

        Laurie, that is a real pile of BS you are spouting. Anyone can see that it was political. Sarah cares for no one but Sarah. I think she should stay in Alaska and shut up.

      • JeffH

        wanda, maybe you could expand on your comment…show the truth. Oh, that’s right, you’re a hater, you wouldn’t know what truth is.
        You want to see some truth…read it and weep!
        http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

      • Bruce D.

        Good post Laurie. You are 100% correct on that.

      • Jana

        Laurie, You are so right. There is nothing she could have done that would have been correct according to the leftists. What they don’t like is she is a fighter. She comes back swinging. I like that.
        They want her to shut up and go away. Well actually, they want all of us on the right to shut up and go away. The answer to that is a great big NO!
        NO I will not shut up, NO I will not go away, and Praise God neither will she. We will stand up for what is right and good in this country and even fight for it if necessary.

    • Bruce D.

      It is you and people like you that should be pitied Sierra. Their can be no group more pathetic than the left.

    • Nikita63

      Typical revisionist liberal history if ever I saw an example. From the day McCain named her as her running mate; the vitriol has NEVER Stopped. You are , like most liberals, dismissing the effects of long term hatred on anyone; particulary when it is as Vicious as it has been with Palin. You liberal protozoa have made allegations early on that her youngest child was her daughter’s, not Bristol, WILLOW! You have made physical threats galore, You have denigrated Bristol and her husband Todd and the litany goes on and on. Where is the outrage? Let’s face facts here. There is no one in this country hated more than Barack Hussein Obama for his arrogance, lying ineptitude, pantywaisted and effeminate so- called leadership and his disdain for American citizens and the Constitution and rule of law while actively diminishing our civil liberties and quality of life to supply entitlements to illegals, failing to secure our borders or Enforce existing law concerning them. Palin stands in oppostion to the perversion of our culture, the revisionist history and the socialist/communist hegemomny Obama and his minions so obviously espouse. Sarah Palin is not a victim of her own bad sense of timing and taste; she IS the victim of a dangerous and deluded group of progressiver nit wits. You can bet that if this kind of crap was being thrown at Obama, threatening his solidarity and private life, the Secret Service would; have been all over the perpetrators. Obama and all you liberals display the elitism which was exhibited in the olds USSR. The party never comprised more than 3% of the total population but they lived like the robber barons they were while the general public was tightly controlled with few if any civil liberties and a totally SUBSISTENCE EXISTENCE. Well, Palin and her supporters,will NOT allow Obama or you misguided misfits to wreak that havoc here. You may control the press, but you do NOT control the free citizens of the United States and, no matter what ties to China for any reason Obama creates, nor will yoiu, EVER!

      • Bruce D.

        Good post Nikita. That pretty accurately sums it up.

      • eddie47d

        Nikita63; You are everything you complained about and then some. Over and over Personnel Liberty sets you up and attempts to move your rage into action. This is the 3rd article on Palin in a week so they keep the flames burning. It works every time and the vitriol is here 24/7 and is expressed in spades. You have exposed yourself to long term hatred and have ran with it and I see no signs of anyone letting up. Your extremely vicious attacks on Obama/Reid/Pelosi/Gore et al. shows the uncontrollable anger. Do YOU care about the numerous death threats against Obama? How about Gifford or Judge Roll? Some liberal commentators are puke but your rants are more extreme and just as dangerous as any right wing commentator.You complain about robber barons but history has shown them to be on that extreme right in political views.So are you “calling” out these pirate corporations that have permeated our landscape? When are you “mis-guided misfits” going to stop controlling the talk shows and spreading your verbiage? I think you are the one trying to revise history!

      • Bruce D.

        Why all the hate for Nikita, Eddie47d???? George Soros is certainly a left wing ideologue trying to destroy this country. Nothing right wing about him. There are right wing progressives like yourself Eddie. No doubt about that. But rich powerful left wing ideologues do not have the countries best interest in mind when they lobby Congress either. Regulations benefit bigger corporations as they squash free enterprise and force small businesses to go under.

      • JeffH

        Bruce D., eddie is just the board harpy spokesman for these Marxist/socialist/communist supporting hate spewing liberals.

      • eddie47d

        Hey Jeff, Go post your Michelle Malkin videos again and again and again. Couldn’t the righties’ get it the first time. More of your propaganda from the propaganda master.

      • eddie47d

        Well Bruce; I only repeated and answered what Nikita printed so if I’m “full of hate” then she must be giving us a double dose of it.

      • JeffH

        eddie, The “facts” cannot be “propaganda”. Have you even opened the link or are you afraid you might see something in it that you don’t want to see?

      • eddie47d

        Stop feeding off of yourself Jeff I’ve known about Malkin for years and that has nothing to do with my response to Nikita’s line of crap. Are you sure cancer cells aren’t eating away at that mind of yours? Maybe your plumbing has backed up?

      • JeffH

        eddie, I’m quite sure that should we ever meet you wouldn’t be so bold as you are with your name calling and hate. As for Malkin, can’t stand her because she “smacks” the liberal rhetoric straight down the drain doesn’t she.
        That said, don’t you have some lies to tell your wife and kids, or do you only lie when you’re on the computer?

      • eddie47d

        No lies Jeff, so there you go again lying about others lying. You are really creepy.

      • JeffH

        Wow! Really creepy? You just can’t decide huh?

      • eddie47d

        Okay,You are extremely creepy! Is that better?

      • JeffH

        creepy definition: – unnerving through fear: unsettling because of causing fear, disgust, or uneasiness

      • Ted Crawford

        Good try eddie but the Secrete Service has stated many time that obama gets no more death threats than other Presidents.

      • eddie47d

        Nice try Ted;Wrong again ! So look it up. President G. Bush received 3,000 death threats every year for 8 years. President Obama has received over 10,950 death threats Per Year so far. You do the math.

      • JeffH

        eddie, a little research goes a long way. Ted got it right!

        The number of reported threats rose from 2,400 in 1965 to 12,800 in 1969. According to some reports, President George W. Bush received about 3,000 threats a year, while his successor Barack Obama received about four times that many. This figure has been disputed by Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan, who says that Obama receives about as many threats as the previous two Presidents.(source-wikpedia)

        There have been a few reports this year claiming that threats are up drastically, which the Secret Service has disputed. Ronald Kessler, published a book this year claiming threats were up by 400 percent. The Boston Globe, in a story on a Congressional Research Service report, said Obama was receiving an “unprecedented” number of threats, stretching the Secret Service’s resources.

        “The threats are not up,” Sullivan said, adding that they receive about the same amount of threats against Obama as they did for presidents Clinton and Bush.

        At the time of the latter report, Secret Service Ed Donovan said that although Obama received a large number of threats during his campaign and directly before and after his inauguration, the number of threats was comparable to the past two presidents.
        http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/secret-service-director-threats-against-obama-not-up.php

      • eddie47d

        Jeff, I’ll stand by what I said and you can stand by what you said.

      • JeffH

        Sorry eddie, you can stay misinformed if you like, I’ve provided my sources to back up my post. That’s right, I forgot, you just make it up as you go.

      • eddie47d

        Didn’t make a thing up which of coarse makes you the pathetic liar you have always been. Grow up dude.I search the web just like you and can think for myself, unlike you.

      • JeffH

        When you have no defense, name calling is your substitue.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        eddie,
        if you research, then why don’t you post your sources???? Because you can’t?

      • JeffH
      • eddie47d

        The definition of insanity is posting the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. You are truly INSANE!!

      • JeffH

        Definition of INSANITY.
        in·san·i·ty noun in-ˈsa-nə-tē
        a : extreme folly or unreasonableness
        b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable
        c : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia)

      • Cliffystones

        Nikita,

        Kudos for summing things up much better than I ever could have.

        I’m currently reading the novel “Atlas Shrugged”, and I’m repeatedly blown away by the events in the story and how they parallel what’s happening now.

        You can forget trying to reason with most of these pinko trolls, they will continue to fiddle while our great country burns.

      • JUKEBOX

        That’s why I coined the name “NEROBAMA”.

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        The Left hates Sarah for the same reason they loved Clinton. Sarah is something they never will be; a good, wholesome, patrioic American. On the other hand Clinton is a low life degenerate, a true representative of his minions.

    • patriotpartisan

      Apparently Jane, you missed the Palin family public sympathy -which is unnecessary to do, family prayers and such should be private, not media events- expressed b/c the Left was too busy screaming “murderer” and u couldn’t hear over the sound of the Left’s high horses parading around. Then when all the dust settles, Barry Soetoro and his Queen made a self-image boosting field trip to his awaiting fans in AZ for another ego filled,self-inflated pride contest. SHAME!!

      • smilee

        PURE GOBBLYGOOK!!

    • smilee

      Right on Jane!! I do not recall any focus from Palin on the real victims in this shooting, only showing anger and poor me!!

  • Richard Barrow

    Is there really one person in this country that would not react to
    a false statement said about them.
    Therefore, why should Sarah Palin not react????
    Is she supposed to just sit there and “Take It”
    If any of the persons on this site, were attacked in
    this manner, they would react and quickly.

    It is the Leftist that are at fault for the media attention,
    and the gunman is at fault for the assaults and murders.

    • Bruce D.

      I agree Richard. She is justified in taking a position. The left will continue their attacks with some other false charge. The left play hard ball dirty politics. They have no choice as their ideology will not stand up to close scrutiny. Obamacare is a good example of that.

    • wanda

      Richard. If Sarah were right it would be ok to comment. otherwise she should shut up!!!

      • ValDM

        Right in whose eyes??? Yours, because you are soooo right, or right in her own eyes? Anyone getting the kind of slanderous and libelous attention she has, should ABSOLUTELY stand up and defend herself. I’m not so enamored of Sarah that I think she’s the cat’s patoot, but I abhor the way the left has ATTACKED her.

      • patriotpartisan

        When did freedom of speech get assassinated? Since when does political discourse only flow in one direction? Since Barry and his (offensive word removed) took office, that’s when!! You socialistic, liberty haters need to hop on a slow-boat to communist China where you’ll be happier… actually ur pathetic lives are so empty, even socialism wouldn’t cheer u up.

      • Karolyn

        I have to say you win the prize for the most hateful person on this site. You have even beaten 141, which is quite a feat. I have not heard anybody use so many vile hateful words on one topic since i started posting here, which is at least 6 months.

      • eddie47d

        His comments are rather mild compared to many I’ve read although i41 is still king. It is rather bizarre that they make disparaging comments to tell us how the liberals make disparaging comments. They can’t see the forest through the trees. Which of coarse means everyone is shouting and no one is listening.

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        Damn, I thought I won the cookie. I guess I’ll just have to try harder or act like a liberal; whine, cry, and demand a recount till I win.

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        Damn!!! I thought I won the cookie.
        I guess I’ll just have to try harder or act like a liberal; whine, cry, and demand a recount till I win.

      • eddie47d

        Well Gunner,we definitely know you aren’t paying attention. LOL

      • Don

        wanda, prove where she is wrong, you halfwit, so u should shut up !!!

    • patriotpartisan

      There’s a saying; “When you wrestle with pigs, you get dirty.” That says a mouth full about this situation… The Palin family is best to let the Leftist propaganda parade implode and stay clear of it all.

    • Doc Franklin

      With the Marxist media in this country, she absolutely could not win this one no matter what she did! If she retorted, she’s guilty and just trying to justify herself. If she kept silent, she’s guilty and knows it, otherwise she would be defending herself! Either way she can’t win in the liberals mind. But for me, I love the fact she won’t shut up, she won’t let those marxist pussies in the media shut her up, she won’t take their crap and she can not only take it, but she can dish it out right back, nice and thick. I love Sarah Palin, and it’s by no means all physical. This woman has brains, brawn and class with a capital C. Keep pissin them off Sarah!!!

      • JUKEBOX

        I believe tha these vitriolic liberal pundits are pissin into a fan, and its blowing back in their face.

  • CL38

    What a skewed picture this piece paints. Palin has consistently used violent rhetoric to ramp up the vitriol over the past two years, comments about lock and load…and reload and many other incendiary statements.

    She’s more than earned this unpopularity. As for a run for the Presidency….I can’t imagine this ill-informed, negatively-focused, destructive, self-serving woman as President. If she runs and actually gets any votes, it speaks to how far our country and educational system has sunk, after a decade of Republican control under Bush. Republican policies, among many other destructive actions, targeted our educational system, setting up “No Child Left Behind” only to intentionally NOT fund it; Republicans have cut other educational funding and dumbed down educational standards to the point where some actually think Sarah Palin is a viable candidate.

    Shame of Republicans.

    • Bruce D.

      We have already seen how far the country has sunk by electing Obama. Shame is something the left has no clue about because their spin keeps them from feeling any.

      • Sally

        How far the country has sunk? Really? The stock market has recovered, jobs are coming back, the auto loans worked and have been repaid, we have not been attacked on our soil…Obama’s policies have IMPROVED things, greatly, for all of us. Yes, unemployment is still too high..that will take time. I’d suggest a little patience, or should we begin demanding that the new proud House majority party fix everything by next week, too?
        We are not scared of Sarah Palin. Her numbers are sinking and her book sales tanking due to her own efforts. She has nothing positive to offer. She hates half the country, a great trait in a President, huh? She is never wrong (shades of GWB) and takes advice from no one. She is afraid of the media, so afraid she refuses to be interviewed. So keep dreaming of a Palin in DC…that’s all it is, a very bad dream.

      • Bruce D.

        Judging by your post Sally is you that hates-not Sarah Palin. Jobs are not coming back and there was a successful terrorist attack at Fort Hood. When you give away three trillion dollars in two years their will be people who will benefit. The Federal Debt Clock projects Obama deficits to be 22 trillion by the year 2015 if he is allowed to continue what you think is good policy.

      • Laurie, Haslet, TX

        No Sally – We are not recovering. AS long as unemployment is still in tne MILLIONS of people – we are not recovering.

        This mess started with CLINTON, was inherited by Bush who is also did nothing to FIX it. In 2 years – OBAMA has done nothing to FIX it.

      • Lewis Munn

        What do you call the invasion from Mexico, so dangerous the President has had to maker parts of our country banned to US citizens?

        Maybe this is just a minor “police action” too big for the whole US government to take care of and stop??

      • JUKEBOX

        Sally, Sarah doesn’t hate half the country, she just disagrees with the liberal population of the left coast and the other reinforced bastions of liberalism. The liberals seem to have a monopoly on hate lately.

      • Doc Franklin

        You seem rather pleased with how things have “turned around” so I won’t totally destroy your bliss by telling you everything (Oh, by the way, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain) but, the value of the dollar has dropped roughly 16% since the Messiah was sworn in, he has whizzed away $3.5 Trillion in the past 24 months and in spite of that, the real unemployment rate has climbed from 8% to just shy of 20%, inflation is running at over 10% in real terms on consumables and the family piggy bank (home equity) has evaporated due to average price deflation of roughly 40% nationwide and in some areas, it is considerably higher. By the end of 2011-2012, Deutschebank says at least 60% of home mortgages will be under water and the figure could reach 80%. Car and home sales are subterranean. Fuel prices have sky rocketed and could reach $4.50-5.00/gal by Summer. Of the miniscule number of jobs that have been “created”, their average cost was approximately $285,000/each. Bond prices are on the precipice and in real danger of collapse and the stock market appears way overbought and the Dow could fall to the 9000 level by the end of the 2nd quarter of 2011. You will likely see massive inflation in food prices throughout the remainder of the year. bottom line, things aren’t remotely as blissful as you’ve been led to believe. I hope your job pays exceedingly well, because you’re going to need it. Just for comparison, the unemployment during the Bush years averaged around 4.7%.

    • wanda

      to CL 38
      You are so right. Sarah Palen isn’t running for president. She is running for Billion air.
      She doesn’t care how many people she causes to die for her.

      • Bruce D.

        You sound like one of those individuals Wanda that should be pulled in for a 72 hour evaluation.

      • Don

        I agree Bruce D. and there is a few others, to many to name !!

      • Doc Franklin

        Your jealousy and envy are impairing your ability to rationally cerebrate.

    • bhscpa

      My wife had a decent job during the Bush administration. Then she went to school, got a degree as a radiology technician, graduated 2 years ago and, after sending hundreds of resumes in the last 2 years, is still at home with no job. So much for Obama’s job-creating skills.
      “Palin has consistently used violent rhetoric to ramp up the vitriol over the past two years…” Compare her comments to someone like Alan Grayson, Rep Cohen (the Nazi guy), Harry Reid(the war is lost), Chris Mathews, Olberman. It seems that liberals are the kings of ‘vitriol’.

    • patriotpartisan

      CL38, you are appropriately on the band-wagon with all the other hypocrites!! Now, we are just waiting for that wagon to go over a steep cliff!! Barry Soetoro can be proven, time and time again, saying violent or demeaning phrases against the Right; bring a gun to a knife fight, they can come along, but they have to sit in the back, show the enemy no mercy, when you want to make progress, u put the car in D not R… then when a Leftist nut kills and wounds his own kind, the Left blames the Right. Do u know of the story about living in glass houses?

    • JeffH

      I’ll repost it for all the haters to reard.

      http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

      Now tell me again who the real hater are?

      • smilee

        You really get off on propaganda don’t you. Does this distortion make you feel good??

      • JeffH

        It’s only natural that you would call this accurate record of progressive/liberal hate comments propaganda. I would like to think that no sane individual would want to be associated with such vitriol and hate and would try to play it of as just “propaganda”.

    • Lewis Munn

      Somehow, in the education of my children, it was the Leftists that did the damage, dumbing down the schools, eliminating anything but the leftist religion, omitting patriotic history, even pushing leftist politics on the very youngest now, and throwing out any right-leaning ideas.

      It is called “Right” for a good reason!! The junk and trash is what’s Left when you remove the Right! And on and on.

    • http://?? Joe H.

      CL38,
      do the words “if they bring a knife we will bring a gun” ring a bell??? No? They were spouted by your hero Nobama!!!

  • newsel

    In the context of this discussion this is well worth a read….

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/why_the_left_hates_sarah_palin.html

    • Angel

      Well, that article was a piece of junk. Liberal hate poor ol’ Sarah because they are “jealous”! Hahahaha… “Yes, leftists attack Palin because they envy her beauty” Oh, yes, I’m sure that explains it. “Some conservatives believe that the hatred is a result of brainwashing; this is true, as well.” I think the right are the brainwashed ones here.

      Stop being sheep and follow the money. She is not a true conservative – remember the bridge to nowhere???? She’s just another neo-con looking to siphon off money from taxpayers to help her cronies. Good riddance!

      • Lewis Munn

        I suppose Obama is such a hero because of his beauty?

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        This is your brain on drugs. hint: don’t smoke dope and try to write a letter.

  • http://www.diyyardandhome.com Dan

    Are the comments on this article for real? Do people really believe cross hairs and bulls eyes had anything to do with the shooting? Does any rhetoric have anything to do with an individuals violent acts? Since when doe we excuse violent behavior by an individual based on what anyone else says or believes?

    I can’t believe uniformed individuals feel free to comment on something they no nothing about. The shooter if anything was a far far left nut case and not influenced by any political rhetoric or symbols that all political parties have used since the beginning of time.

    • Laurie, Haslet, TX

      most of them are paid TROLLS – paid to post false hateful rhetoric on as many blogs as possible.
      The others are mis-guided individuals who are just parroting what they are told by the TROLLS and LEFT WING MEDIA.

    • Ted Crawford

      It seems to stem from the rantings of a drug additicted, homosexual that the progressives believe to be the greatest psycologist of all time. I’m aware of no one in greater need of mental help than Sigmund Freud was! They want everyone to play victum to something, anything to avoid personal responsibility!

    • smilee

      Dan says:
      January 21, 2011 at 8:04 am

      If he was a far left liberal then one would think he would have shot a far right wing conservative and not Gabby. You make no sense!

      • JeffH

        …correction, a conservative cannot be on the far right. That would be a far right “winger”, something conservatives are not. Oh, by the way, Giffords was a moderate Democrat or what some call a “Blue Dog” Democrat.

  • Kris

    I don’t take anything that comes out of cnn seriously! Liberal loons own it and work there and most who watch are liberal loons! The lames stream media are doing the same thing to Palin that they did to Bush. Killing her, and why? Because she has balls and they are afraid of any woman who has balls and speaks the truth! If the killer in Arizona represents any party, it is the democrat party! Next comes the gun bans, never let a good crisis go to waste! They are writing bills now that will restrict free speech, is this what you want? The supremes basically declared the constitution null and void on jan 18, 2011. We are well on the way to dictatorship!Wake up liberals, your country is gone! Thankyou so much!!!!

    • Ian Burton

      Ha “has the balls to seek the truth”; at BEST she is a self-promoting media harlot practicing only her own brand of “de docta ignorantia”, and at worst a shameless media troll, willing to abuse ANY platform to a far-right political base of no-government, which may or may not include insurrectionist.

      And please follow your logic… “Dems want to take away guns because they HATE them” equals “dems are likened to the AZ shooter”. I think it is rediculous to say that they shooter was motivated by any politics, the news and many members of the democratic party were WAY too hasty in placing blame directly on Palin. You really can not try and rationalize mental insanity, because it isn’t an issue of ignorance or misdirection, it is one of biology, and saying that any kind of political rhetoric could influence him is outrageous (Although it’s still not healthy). And if it could have been left at that it would have been great, but instead the “bullseye” was brought to the attention of over-saturated ears.

      • James

        Ian B., I agree. There’s no evidence that Jared Loughner targeted Rep. Giffords because of her politics. He shot her because people were lining up to speak to her, while he had no friends left at all. He is a mentally disturbed person who was insanely envious of people like Gabrielle Giffords.

      • I hate Jane Fonda!

        yes…uh huh,Just ignore the fact that he went straight to a politician and shot her.Oh,he’s insane because he targeted one of our “blue dog”(you see me throwing the qoutation fingers up?)Democrats.Wake up you morons.He was and likely still is pissed off at the progressives.Everyone with good sense is.You people could screw up a wet dream,and I have a for instance…California!But the truth is that since you cannot see it coming,it will probably happen again.You are in what the addicts call a state of denial.But who do you choose to direct your spite at?A woman.That shows what cowards you really are!There was a time in America when I thought people like you had backbones….what a farce it all is.You have to pick on Mrs.Palin because you cant stomach the idea that someone who could kick your ass,might possibly have something to say.So you jump on the liberal coward bandwagon,and point the finger at her.You people are pathetic to the core.I wouldnt urinate on you if you were on fire.Nothing but contempt here folks for these progressive idiots….something they well deserve.My home state of California has been decimated by these charlatans,who claim to want to “progress”.Tiny minded wipers of other peoples bottoms,is what they are.Worthless to the bone.Is that scatheing enough for you progressove powder puffs?

      • Ian Burton

        And please correct me if I am incorrect, but you really couldn’t be suggesting that he was politically motivated, it will happen again and for good reason because everyone with sense is upset with progressives?

        Again Sir, I must IMPLORE you to realize that politics isn’t a dichotomy, there isn’t just the “right” and “progressives”. If anything more moderation in politics is needed and veiled rhetoric isn’t conducive toward the democratic process, cooperation is.

        Engage each other with civility and the politics is sure to follow.

      • castaway

        Excellent, to the point, and very accurate post.

      • I hate Jane Fonda!

        Why do you think that politics isnt the reasoning for this man to start shooting?He walked directly up to a politician and shot her. If he isnt pissed off at politicians then he shot this one by accident?He didnt start out with just anyone in the crowd.Hello…. Your issue is that you lsten to the media spout what its told to say by the FCC.Narrow-minded folks do exactly just that.What you need to do is to understand that government is not the end-all-be-all of our nation.We dont like govenment intrusion on everything we do.We dont want their imbecilic laws.We dont want them to become all-powerful.We dont want them telling us what we should or should not do.We dont like Big Brother Sam I am!I felt the need to break this down so even you can understand it…hence the Dr.Suess reference.We have a referendum in this nation,right now.We can either contiue thinking like you do…tantamount to extinction,or we can do what we always did best which is to think outside the tiny box which you have reserved for your limited intelligence.This is a adult problem,so sit your infantile concepts back and let the grown-ups do the math.What we surely do not need is for slack-jawed idiots to keep treating us like mushrooms,a condition that the current power elite tries to perpetuate.Take it from an independent source here folks,he shot a politician because he was tired of the games he saw them playing with everything.Ignore this at your own political peril!

      • ValDM

        He shot a politician because he had a weird fascintion for THIS PARTICULAR politician. He had been stalking her. What about this do most of you not get about this incident?????

      • Don

        i don’t like jane either, and i agree with you 100 % !!!

  • http://MSN Ron Williams

    I think that all of you that are trying to put a good-real person down should take a good look at your selves. First thing you need to do is to pull your head out and get a breath of fresh air.

    • skip

      Ron – is that sort of talk the best you can do when people write a reasoned response? No wonder this country is in such a mess. Civil discourse will go a lot further – give it a try!

      • bhscpa

        Reasoned responses rarely come from the agenda-driven progressives.

      • JUKEBOX

        Most progressives have a terminal case of rectal cranial inversion.

      • wandamurline

        When the left becomes civil, we will join them. Don’t hold your breath … it ain’t a gonna happen anytime soon.

      • castaway

        I have not read a reasoned response here yet. Only liberal rhetoric.Same as I have been listening to for over 6 years. Just more ignorant B.S..

      • JUKEBOX

        Ignorance is when you have not learned anything, stupid is when you ar not capable of learning anything. Many progressives are dumb turkeys, and most of the rest are ignorant idealogues.

  • Glenn Bax NJ

    If Sara Palin doesn’t think what she’s saying or doing is irresponsible then why were her people so quick to take the cross-hairs map off the web site so hastily?
    Of course this guy is a nut case but how many more are out there? It’s bad enough when they hear the voices in they’re head’s telling them bad things. But what happens when those voices are real and broadcast over the media?
    Everyone’s waiting for him to say weather or not the cross-hairs made him do it. That answer may never come from him! But we are all afraid of what these influential politicians are saying and how they are saying it.
    I think they’re afraid also, that’s why the cross-hairs map was removed so quickly? Not so much because of the fear of more random people getting hurt or killed but because of the political consequences.
    The very next day a clear statement should have replaced the cross-hairs map with a heart felt sincere apology that if this was the cause of this tragedy I am truly sorry! Not, “the shooting was not my fault”. It broke my heart to know that 9-year-old Christina Green was killed. Doesn’t Mrs. Palin have a very young daughter also?

    • wanda

      Glenn Bax NJ
      You are soooo right.

    • bhscpa

      “Everyone’s waiting for him to say weather or not the cross-hairs made him do it.” Are you nuts? Where are the facts that suggest the loser might have looked at Palin’s website? It’s like Rep. Cohen’s theory: say it enough and people will believe it. Leave it to the masters of progressive propaganda.

      • meteorlady

        Well said…..

    • Delores Smith

      GlennBaxNJ
      They took down the cross-hair chart to replace it with the Democrat chart that “targets” people. The shooter admitted he never watches Television or Radio. How could anyone but himself? I think I know your problem. Sarah Palin shoots straighter than you do. It’s an ego thing, isn’t it?
      Delores Smith
      Delores109@cox.net

      • Lewis Munn

        Very good point.

      • smilee

        He isn’t talking so how can you say he said he does not watch TV, most likely BS

      • JeffH

        Delores, it was an alleged friend of Loughners that made that statement in an interview.

        A high school friend of the accused gunman dismissed speculation that Loughner’s alleged rampage was sparked by political passion.

        “He did not watch TV, he disliked the news,” Zach Osler said. “He didn’t listen to political radio, he didn’t take sides, he wasn’t on the left, he wasn’t on the right.”

        Osler said that Loughner was angry at the world.

        “He wasn’t shooting people, he was shooting at the world,” the friend said.

      • http://deleted Claire

        JeffH–Thank you for your post. Finally, someone (You) has the decency to post what is accurate. Neither party had anything to do with this murderer’s rampage. He is a classic nutjob just like the Ft. Hood shooter.

    • wandamurline

      She took it down to try to get the liberals off her butt. She has been raped by the news media for everything since the day she accepted to run for vice president. They were so relentless, even after the election, that she finally left her position as governor so the state would be able to function.

      • eddie47d

        Nice spin Wanda.

      • JeffH

        wandamurline, and those are the facts of the matter…without the liberal spin!

      • eddie47d

        Now it’s a double spin with Jeff’s input! Must be a Conservative dance step.

      • JeffH

        You’re right, only it’s call the “Liberal Stomp”, something that Michelle Malkin does regularly!

      • eddie47d

        She gets paid the big bucks to do that. Why don’t you sign up, for that is right up your alley.

      • JeffH

        eddie, Thank You, I’ll take that as a complimant although I’m sure you meant it as a snub.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        JeffH,
        I wonder how many liberal politicians could go through the intense investigation by the media, the police, and detectives that Sarah went through, have that many charges levied against them and come out as clean as she did??? Of all the trumped-up charges she had levied against her in court, she was found innocent of all except one misdemeanor!!! I really wonder if Nobama could do the same????

      • JUKEBOX

        I believe that Obama, under his own signature and writings, has freely admitted to marijuana and cocaine use, which is a felony in most states, especially at the time he did it. Who the hell vetted him for his security clearance? It must have been Barney Fife.

      • JeffH

        Joe H., you just made a good point, something that is convieniently overlooked by the lamestream media altogether.

    • JeffH

      I’ll give the left credit, when they go after somebody, they get the job done, mainly with lies and mis-information or just not reporting the truth. We all know the lefty liberals are the nice guys and the conservatives, Tea Party and the right are the hatefull ones.
      Maybe not, ya think?

      Check out this website if you have the guts. Want to see real hate by the progressive lefty libs…grow some cahones for a change and face up to what is really said by the progressive lefty liberals.
      Michelle Malkin lays it all out, in real time.
      The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010
      http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

      • JeffH

        Oh, before any of you start calling Malkin a sham, I’ll note that she tears you guys apart daily and she ain’t your friend…so have at it. Your negative comments will only reinforce the facts of the matter presented above.

      • http://gunner689 gunner689

        That’s what happens when the media is on the other side, selective and biased reporting

    • castaway

      The media is a very powerful thing to simple minded liberals who have not the brain power to think for themselves. Hence, the reason liberals are drawn to socialism. Cross hairs, who needs em? Look down and do you see the red dot over your heart?

      • Lewis Munn

        Nah, as a Conservative, according to the Liberals, I have no heart, nor any brains, so I should never be killed by anything!

    • JUKEBOX

      Yes she does, and all of her children have been “TARGETED” by the liberal and tabloid press in one way or another.

  • Ian Burton

    “Ad hominem”, “tu quoque” and “red herring”.
    Plus there was the fallacy of… deflecting blame while you’re doing the same thing, I forgot what that was called though; ex. you said that crosshairs weren’t crosshairs while saying bullseyes are bulleyes.

    Keep your logic in check please (-:

    T-PARTY FOR LIFE!!!!!!

    • wandamurline

      Yes, and if you do a little research, you will find that the Democrats used the same thing in 2004…and they called them “targets”, only the liberals can use something and then condemn someone else for using the same thing. Well, that is why they are liberal socialists….they yell fire all the time….everything that has to do with undoing an injustice to the people like Obamacare, they start their rhetoric and pointing out that it is for our own safety…bull…it is for control of the masses and power and money.

      • JUKEBOX

        The liberals will have to start calling TARGETS, “VISUAL SIGHTING AIDS”.

  • Doc Sarvis

    Good post Sally.
    I guess to get her numbers back up Ms. Palin will need to have another “reality” TV show since that is where most desparate lightweights end up.

    • JUKEBOX

      Most of the “LIGHTWEIGHTS” end up on MSNBC or CNN. Reality is where most people in fly over country live.

  • Sally

    Did you not watch her ‘poor me’ interview with Hannity? She herself called them “bulleyes,” several times. Either they are or they aren’t, but the perception from the day she put that map up, it that they weren’t meant to be crosshairs, and she was called on it immediately, but refused to take it down, because she takes advice from no one. Did she pull the trigger in Tucson? No, but her gun references are daily; her churning her crowds in 2008 to cries of “Kill him!” regarding candidate Obama—this is what she does…she gins up rhetoric, then stands back to claim innocence when something bad happens. “Oh, Sean, our calls to arms meant get out to the voting booth. Our votes are our arms.” Right. That’s why conservatives are often at political events with loaded assault weapons. Peace.

    • Mr P

      Sally seems to be just another jealous commie-pinko-liberal bed-wetter. The only hate speach is coming from liberals. Lets start with cris mattews, ed shultz, the clown senator from Tenn., herr olbermann, rachel madcow, etc. and all refferecnces to the tea party being racist, and looking like the kkk. You don’t know history very well. the kkk was started by the democrats, and if it hadn’t been for repubs, the civil rights amendment would never have passed out of congress, as almost all dems voted against it, including algores dad.

      • wanda

        Sally . You are stupid. Beck and Bill have brainwashed you. Stop watching Fox.

      • Laurie, Haslet, TX

        Hey Wanda – your STUPIDITY is showing – you addressed your comment to SALLY – who is on YOUR SIDE

        The Progressives are SO STUPID – they cannot even read!

      • Laura

        Right on Laurie!!

      • http://deleted Claire

        Can any politician use common sense when they talk? Dang few.

      • skip

        Democrats in those days are the Republicans of the South today. They were not Republicans then because they hated Lincoln for his stances on slavery. Check the years the switch from Democrat to Republican took place in the South, and what took place during those years.

        Palin’s popularity is sinking because of what she says and how she says it – nothing more, nothing less.

        On the basis of recent speeches, there is no contest on civility. Like him or not, Obama hit it out of the park with respect to decency and civility – you can’t do better than he did.

      • Stan Lee

        Yeah Skip:
        I can understand how you see it the way you do. Sure,Obama does give a good speech, no argument on that issue.
        Incidentally, I suppose it has dawned on you that his speech was intended to be given for the sake of the families of the shooting survivors and those mourning the losses of loved ones.
        That being the case, why make a campaign appearance out of the crisis, so as not to waste an opportunity? Why arrive four days after the fact to a jammed auditorium of screaming, demonstrating, Obamaites, wearing pre-printed tee shirts with a common Obama motto on them?

        And, what of the “civility” that Obama seemed to endorse? Have his news media boosters and his people in Congress gotten his message?
        Or, do they all understand that the whole thing was a facade, a publicity stunt, a less than half-hearted attempt to appear concerned? And, last but not least, how come that stellar Democrat Party booster, Sheriff Dupnik, is still spouting his uncivil accusations when actually, he ought to be cited for malfeasance in office? That shooter, completely apolitical by the words of all those who know him,was stalking Ms. Giffords, by this Sheriff’s own admission, for three years. Yet, no police protection was provided her for a shopping mall appearance?

        I suppose you’d call such a session respectful, dignified,and solemn.
        Or, was it more necessary and timely for Obama to kick-off his next campaign there?

      • Ship of Fools

        The “campaign”-like atmosphere of Obama’s speech in Tucson was, by all accounts, created by an over-zealous college audience. Obama did a remarkable job at maintaining gravitas in light of that atmosphere. No brainer, friend.

      • ValDM

        this is in reply to ship of fools:
        College kids? Wee must not have seen the same thing, unless your idea of college kids are “kids” over 30. Some of them WAY over 30.

      • RoyfromKs

        This comment is not just for Stan Lee. This applies to everyone!
        You Democrats keep talking about degrees and a degree doesn’t make a man! Where I come from it’s common sense! You can’t take a military scholar and put him in battle because he’ll get killed! He has yet to develop common sense!….that’s why he he goes thru intense training before hitting the battlefield!
        If you listen to Glenn Beck you’d learn more than any Liberal school would have taught you! These people are for real….no mater their schooling….they have common sense!
        I learned a long time ago what the Liberal Democrats were doing to our America! I haven’t voted Democrat sense Kennedy!
        Chris Mathews is a educated idiot! He went to one of our famous Liberal colleges that don’t teach anything except Liberalism as with most of the other idiots!
        Look at Sebelius, she bragged about knowing more than other people because she had a “degree” ! She’s from Kansas and I know her actions! If I were her, I don’t think I would be bragging about my education!
        You talk about the journalist in the news! Our Liberal Journalist go out and make the news and then give their slanted views! That’s not what a real journalist does…..listen to Sara Palin, she had training and said they were all wrong in the way the news was reported!
        Obama killed two birds with one stone at the shooting memorial! He did present a good speech but Where else could you combine memorial services with campaigning? Obama has been I campaign mode ever sense his slipping into office!
        The Democrats will follow all the stupid tactics that they do so well because that is all they have for their defense! Whats bad is that the Republicans have to correct everything the Democrats do to keep America safe and out of the hands of the criminals! When they (Republicans) could be working on other things to improve America!
        George Soros has gotten rich with his Liberal,Marxist views! Now he’s trying to take America down like he did with other countries! Talk about “cross-hairs, bulleye’s and ect. he is elgible for anything or all the above!
        When it comes to Fox News, there is no other. That’s why thit ratings are so high! You see, Fox News reports the truth! Even if it’s not Conservative! The other news people only report on their biased Liberalized slant of the news.
        Degrees are made to frame and put up on the wall! It’s like a Doctors license to practice medicine….it doesn’t make him a doctor! It takes years of training as a person before he gets his common sense! Common sense, you don’t frame and put up on the wall!
        And this part about Abe Lincoln, why are the blacks against him now? Don’t they know which side of their bread is buttered? Abe did a lot for the abolishing of slavery in America and now they ignore what he did for them! That’s really bad, they went with the Liberals because it was an easy way out! We do have a few Conservative blacks and thank God for that! Obama could have really made a good name for himself and the black movement if he would have been Conservative instead of Socialist! I could go on and on but I’m just an old man voicing my opinion!!!

      • who cares

        What would you rather see or hear, President Obama giving comfort to the people of Tucson, AZ. or while in DC speacker John Boehner and the G.O.P are having COCKTAILS. no matter what positive Pres Obama and Democrats do or not do the cons-ervative/republicans will find something nagative to do or say against. When ever any of you or the tea party wants to talk trash you’ll junp in freedom speech wagon last time i remember free speech was for all. But the tea party is the exception to the rules they be running around like white bunnies with their assault rifles, portraying Pres Obama like hitler and the joker words have consequences something half governor Sarah Palin should know a thing or two about words like Blood label or as she like to say dont retreat reload here’s a good one crosshair she calls it a bullseye to add icing to the cake, and if was not plain enough Sarah Palin had to use by name Rep Gabriel Gifford and state, and other Democrats. If Cheney can get away with shooting a person on the face and not even have a investigation. Palin has nothing to worry about. Had a democrat even farted made sound like a shot you fairies would be running around like a chicken with out heads calling them every name in the book. But it’s okay when you fairies do it because you guys have God on you side oh lets not forget and country!! you can lead a horse to water but you can’t get it to drink that falls through with you fairies, we can lead you to the truth and i know is hard when you only have half a brain, and you need Fox (opinio) news 2nd and 3rd person to tell you fairies who, what, where, when and why. But we free thinker tried any way we try to tell you that you are being craped on by you party, lied by Fox. The republicans party are running on dust bunnies they have nothing but lies they know the Public option is not passing it is only waste of time and tax payers money it’s a fairy feel good to you they voted they kept their promise. The difference between Huffington Post, Rachel Maddow and others they point out the lie’s of ($35M)Glenn Beck, ($22M)Sean Hannity, and (tokyo Rose) ($58M)Limbaugh they are paid BIG BUCKS to pass misinformation because they know their listeners dumb shits. Why you think Sarah Palin goes to fox. With all said and done it make’s no F#*&KING different, you fairies a bunch of dumb shitshead. Eight year of Bush what good did he do??? what did he do for you?? He cost me $3000 a year more in taxes. the price fuel went up food, health, car, house insurance they all went up, loss of jobs under bush. Why would anyone want to go back to republican rule? It’s dumb, you fairies are dumb.

      • smilee

        Stan Lee says:
        January 21, 2011 at 9:20 am

        Sorry Stan the families and the victims didn’t see it your way nor did most of the country. Just spin from you!!

      • Dan az

        Who cares
        Some times I wounder who the elite are dont you?
        One of the great myths of the left is that socialism is a movement of the people, the working classes, or the poor. In fact — as Frederick Hayek pointed out long ago — all socialist movements are the creation of intellectual elites, liberally pollinated by millionaires. Karl Marx was the kept intellectual of factory owner Frederick Engels; Bill Ayers, a leader of the terrorist cult called the Weatherman, was a scion of the American upper class; Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of The Nation, is a multi-millionairess; Michael Moore, leftwing propagandist, is a multi-millionaire who has profited handsomely from the “struggle.” The Leftwing Millionaires Club is a very incomplete list designed to illustrate this point and to serve as a reminder that everything is not always what it appears. (Text: Frederick Hayek “The Intellectuals and Socialism,” in Hayek, Socialism and War, University of Chicago Press, 1997)

        LEFTWING MILLIONAIRES’ CLUB

        #
        Anagnos, Aris
        #
        Arafat, Yasser
        #
        Baldwin, Alec
        #
        Baron, Fred
        #
        Belafonte, Harry
        #
        Benjamin, Medea
        #
        Bing, Stephen
        #
        Castro, Fidel
        #
        Cher,
        #
        Chomsky, Noam
        #
        Clinton, Hillary Rodham
        #
        Clinton, Bill
        #
        Clooney, George
        #
        Couric, Katie
        #
        Donahue, Phil
        #
        Ehrenreich, Barbara
        #
        Evans, Jodie
        #
        Farrakhan, Louis
        #
        Farrell, Mike
        #
        Fonda, Jane
        #
        Friedan, Betty
        #
        Geffen, David

        #
        Ginsburg, Ruth Bader
        #
        Glaser, Robert
        #
        Glover, Danny
        #
        Goodman, Amy
        #
        Gore, Al
        #
        Hayden, Tom
        #
        Jackson, Jesse
        #
        Jennings, Peter
        #
        Jong, Erica
        #
        Katzenberg, Jeffrey
        #
        Kennedy, Edward (Ted)
        #
        Kennedy, Jr., Robert F.
        #
        Kerry, John
        #
        Kerry, Teresa Heinz
        #
        Kirsch, Michele
        #
        Kirsch, Steven
        #
        Leno, Jay
        #
        Lewis, Peter
        #
        MacArthur, John R.
        #
        Maher, Bill
        #
        Mailer, Norman
        #
        McKay, Robert

        #
        Moore, Michael
        #
        Moyers, Bill
        #
        Navasky, Victor
        #
        Obama, Barack Hussein
        #
        Penn, Sean
        #
        Pot, Pol
        #
        Raitt, Bonnie
        #
        Rappaport, Andrew
        #
        Rather, Dan
        #
        Redgrave, Vanessa
        #
        Reiner, Rob
        #
        Robbins, Tim
        #
        Roberts, Julia
        #
        Rockefeller, Wendy Gordon
        #
        Sandler, Herb and Marion
        #
        Sarandon, Susan
        #
        Scheer, Robert
        #
        Seeger, Pete
        #
        Sheen, Martin
        #
        Smiley, Tavis
        #
        Sontag, Susan
        #
        Soros, George

        #
        Spielberg, Steven
        #
        Springsteen, Bruce
        #
        Stone, Oliver
        #
        Streisand, Barbra
        #
        Turner, Ted
        #
        vanden Heuvel, Katrina
        #
        Vidal, Gore
        #
        West, Cornel
        #
        Zinn, Howard

      • JeffH

        skip-py, “Palin’s popularity is sinking because of what she says and how she says it – nothing more, nothing less.”

        Naw skippy, Palin never will be popular because the Marxist run media attacks destroyed her in ’08 and the “majority” still believe what the leftist lame stream media has been telling them for two years. Nothing more, nothing less.

      • Stan Lee

        Ship of Fools:

        Well, Ship old boy, a considerate-thinking President would not have held a memorial service for mourners at a loaded college auditorium.
        But, once there, with all the adulation he got from those mass-printed, tee shirt clad “college kids,” Mr. Obama could have beckoned them to quiet down and be respectful of the occasion.

        He didn’t…he saw only one thing, votes! The man’s all about himelf.

      • JimBob

        Jeffy Boy,

        Y’all jis don’t git it, does y’all? Y’all must be a dum ol’ yankee. If’n days more of y’all CONservatives dan days of us’ns, why dos it matter what the media critters says or writes ’bout Po Ol’ Sarah, the CONservative talk show media ho? All y’all CONservatives is jist what the first three alfabit things say y’all is – CONs. Y’all got bunchs of dat ol’ mule feces stuff in y’alls noggins dat runs outta y’alls traps, but y’all ain’t got none of dat gray stuff dat y’alls posta use ‘fore y’all shoot off y’alls trap. Git it? I’m sorry fer y’all.

      • Sprock

        First try using spell check. Obviously you have no substance to your argument or you wouldn’t have started you response with an Elementary school name calling rant. Chris Mathews, Keith Olberman, and Rachel Maddow all have COLLEGE DEGREES. Keith Olberman has a degree in Journalism and Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar. Your icons, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck have NO degrees. Those three think you spell it “Road Skoler”. Please Please Please nominate Sarah as your standard bearer for 2012. I love a slam dunk.

      • meteorlady

        Ah another better than you person who believe a degree is tantamount to success or honesty. IN all honesty I don’t listen to any of these people because they are not journalists anymore. A good journalist reports the news, does not incite people, does not twist things to suit their purpose. A good journalist does not ever put their personal opinion into an article. They are honest, non-biased and fair in their reporting. These type of journalists have been dead a long time, ever since the elites took over the broadcast and paper news through mergers and aquisitions.

      • http://Verizon Bud G.

        Sprock seems to believe a degree makes you intelligent. There was a test on the internet two years ago to see if one was smarter than President Obama. Well, according to the test, I am and with only two years of college. In the school for senior non commissioned officers, I scored higher on exams than three who had masters degrees and 27 others who had three or more years of college. If you have a degree and an IQ less than 130 and no common sense, I believe it doesn’t make you more intelligent than one with no degree with an IQ of 130 and common sense. Why are the ratings of the people you love going down. Could it be the American public is tired of listening to their twisted views?

        Unfortunately, our institutions of higher learning are more interested in teaching the propaganda of the left than educating our students.

      • Kinetic1

        meteorlady,
        You are confusing journalists with commentators. Olberman, Rush, Shultz and Beck are paid to provide their opinion. The difference come into play when people like Hannity, who stresses his position as commentator whenever he is assailed for distorting the facts, then turns and tells us that we need go nowhere else to hear all the news of the day. Also, contrast the experience of Limbaugh or Beck to that of Chris Matthews or Lawrence O’Donnell. The latter two have years of working alongside leaders in our government, while the former two are a DJ and a comedian. The opinions of commentators can be of value in learning the facts in any case, but you need to be aware of the knowledge and the agenda of those you are listening to.

      • Lewis Munn

        I agree. I think it used to be called “Yellow Journalism”, when rather than reporting facts, personal biases were included to slant the news. “All the new we print to fit” approach.

        And the vociferous hollering of those who seem to be Liberals shows that the truth hits home, and hurts.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        kinetic,
        Now you BELITTLE commediens while a while back you were touting the virtues of a certain elected official that was a commedien!!!

      • Dan Burke

        I find interesting that there are those here so obsessed with how poor it is that we get our news from commentators like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity. I don’t listen to all of them, but if you listened you would actually hear them decry what a shame it is that you get more honest news from them too!!! And why is that, because the people here that state that journalists all too commonly are not really journalists anymore, well, they are speaking the truth.

        Take for example, the recent shooting of Gifford. How many articles and statements included, “there is no evidence” and then proceeded to condemn the vitriol of the commentators on radio as well as Sarah Palin for inciting people like this young man to violence. Is that reporting? No evidence is reporting? That is the sad state of journalism.

        I work with computers. There is an expression. “Garbage in. Garbage out.” The same thing applies to humans. If all we learn is garbage, then all we will regurgitate is garbage in our thinking. While it possible to change course, how many abused in childhood become abusers as adults? How many that saw their parents cheat in their marital relationships will do the same to their own spouses? There are many that beat these cycles, but you may find a common theme that at some point the “garbage in” had to be rewritten, removed, and/or replaced.

        So what of those college degrees? If our journalists and politicians are any sort of litmus test for how much “garbage in” they are getting, then I would agree that they are worthless. In fact, I talked to an executive once who said that when he chooses college candidates over the uneducated like myself (he was trying to encourage me to finish my degree) is because it speaks of commitment to finish a project to the end. The degree itself was only minimally worthwhile. Most of the time they have to re-train the individual anyways, building upon what they learned in their degree and helping them “unlearn” what would detrimental to the job.

      • Peter

        With apologies to no-one, and a very clear statement that I am neither GOP nor Dem, let me point out as kindly as I can that there is not one honest politician in either house! Nor is there an honest, unbiased journalist reporting on matters emanating from either house or the Whitehouse!
        Fact: All politicians receive donations from either the corporate world, the unions or both. The donors don’t do so for nothing, they want a serious return on their investment. BO has disappointed many, so guess what? Millions of dollars is pouring into GOP campaign coffers from corporate & insurance interests. In the US it’s called donations. In any other situation it would be called what it is – bribery and corruption. On both sides of politics folks, America is for sale to the highest bidder. None of them are honest. Period.
        Fact: In any business, the owner never employs anyone who doesn’t agree with their ethos, therefore, liberal media owners (like CNN) employ liberal trained ‘journalists’ (I use the term very lightly), who are well trained in putting a liberal bent on every story, while appearing to present both sides. Conservative media (like Fox) employ conservative ‘journalists’ to do the same thing from the other side of the coin.
        Like the politicians, there is not one honest, unbiased ‘journalist’ reporting anything these days. No journalist presents an open, honest appraisal of both sides of any issue. By simple but devious acts of emphasis or omission, they all subtly convince the public that their presentation of the issue is ‘correct’.
        It then falls to you and me, the public, to display our own integrity by searching out the truth for ourselves. By that I mean not just reading or viewing material from one side, but investigating every available source of information on a subject, so you can find the real truth somewhere in the middle of all the spin and hype.
        Folks, both sides rely heavily on the fact most Americans won’t bother to do that. Most citizens act more like sheep than intelligent human beings unfortunately. An old adage says, “2% of people think; 3% of people think they think, and 95% of people would rather die than think”. This is what politicians and the media (all of it) rely on.

      • SteveB

        Sprock…..Some of us “read the books” and some of us “write the books”. Without getting long winded and boasting about my own qualifications let me remind you to check your history. You’ll find that many so-called “geniuses” had “no degrees”! Sounds like the best use of your degrees is for toilet paper.

      • Laurie, Haslet, TX

        Being a Rhodes Scholar does not mean you have any intelligence.
        C

        Bill Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar – yet did not know that ORAL SEX had anthing to do with SEX or infidelity..

      • Ship of Fools

        Huh?

      • bob wire

        “Laurie, Haslet, TX says:
        January 21, 2011 at 10:07 am

        Being a Rhodes Scholar does not mean you have any intelligence.”

        Well please tell us what it does mean Laurie.

      • Jana

        bob wire,
        It could mean that he is just an educated idiot. Being educated does not guarantee common sense, which most of these supposed highly educated people lack.

      • Deanna

        Yeah, He’s real smart, isnt he, oral sex even has sex in the name. So what does all his education mean, he still not to smart!!

      • Cliffystones

        I’m quite sure Olbermann, Maddow, etc. spent their college time experimenting with the “brown acid”. They make me ashamed of my higher education.

      • bob wire

        sorry buddy,

        but I think not, ~ people that have used much acid, tend to think slower and say, ugh? da? a lot.

      • eddie47d

        Limbaugh?

      • http://deleted Claire

        Don’t even mention Limbaugh’s name. Yuck!!

      • ValDM

        A Rhodes Scholar is a socialist. If you doubt me, look into the hsitory of Cecil Rhodes, who started this mess. He was one of the most influential men to promote socialism and communism of both the 19th and 20th centuries.

      • ImWithStupid

        My favorite professor in college was a devout christian and a true conservative… oh ya she was also a Rhodes Scholar

      • bob wire

        “ValDM says:
        January 21, 2011 at 10:50 am

        A Rhodes Scholar is a socialist.”

        Could very well be. ~ A Rhodes Scholar is someone that has applied themselves in discipline of thought and can absorb and assimilate data and information well beyond what might be considered “common”.

        They are to be despised and hated by any Tea Party crowd that’s mind works primarily off the sense of smell.

      • ValDM

        If she was a devout Christian, she must have thrown over her “indoctrination” from being a Rhodes Scholar. You can’t serve two masters. Incidentally, Kris Krisofferson (you know, the country singer/songwriter) was also a Rhodes Scholar……….what does that have to do with the price of tea in China?? At least, he didn’t get on the politcial stump and tell us he knew how to run our lives better than we do.

      • Doc Franklin

        Bob Wire. The better the olfaction, the higher the IQ. One of the earliest signs of impending dementia is the loss of smell. You were serendipitously correct. Thanks for the compliment, and for admitting what we already knew, that we are intellectually superior to the anosmic liberal.

      • Stan Lee

        Sprock:

        “People who live in glass houses….” Talking of “name-calling rant,” the TV commentators you named, all with college degrees (which seems so important to you)lead their profession in character assassination and name calling. Ergo, the fact that all three of them, lumped together, don’t compete with one show rating of the same type on Fox News. The Fox News audience certainly isn’t all Republicans, therefore an audience in such record-setting numbers has to be looking for far more than what Matthews, Maddow, and Obermann give them.

      • Kinetic1

        Stan Lee,
        The comic book link seems apropos. Estimated readership of Newsweek magazine, 1.5 million. Estimated readership of The National Enquirer, over 9 million. Quality of content can not be measured by ratings.

      • JeffH

        Sprock, another “intelligent liberal” who actually believes a “degree” automatically put you above everyone else. Seems to be another “myth” the left takes pride in. The “You’re all ignorant and I’m not because I’m better educated” syndrome. Ah, and spell check…yea, you’re also the grammar and spelling cop too! That’s all the argument you can make? By the way, just showing your support for the “alphabet” morons at MSNBC speaks volumes about your education…book smarts and not an ounce of common sense!

        I didn’t even use spell check either…imagine that.

      • Ted Crawford

        Ted Kaczynski had a PHD sprock. It didn’t make him very intellegent! He clearly lacked any sembelence of common sense

      • http://yahoo richard

        and any one of the three you named is smarter than all of those educated idiots you named combined

      • Kinetic1

        Mr P,
        Have you ever actually watched Rachel Maddow’s show? She is among the most even tempered folks on TV. Just the other night she devoted almost half of her show to a very pleasant interview with Michael Steele. And I have never seen Olberman resort to the levels of hate commonly seen on Glen Beck’s show. All these claims of left wing hate talk are just another example of the Carl Rove play book; attack the oppositions strengths and blame them for everything you yourself have done.

        As for your claims about the KKK, anyone who has studied the history of the parties knows that both parties were vastly different 100 years ago. At the time of the KKKs founding, Southern Democrats were a very powerful segment of the party. In 1860 the issue of slavery split the Democratic party between those in the north and those in the south, each of whom nominated their own candidate for president. This split lead to the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln.

        Following the Great Depression, the divide between the Democrats reached a peak, and the conservative constituency of the South, angered by the progressive agenda of FDR either retired, or in many cases left to join the Republican party. To quote a passage from wikipedia “Under FDR, the Democratic Party became identified more closely with modern liberalism, which included the promotion of social welfare, labor unions, civil rights, and the regulation of business. The opponents, who stressed long-term growth and support for entrepreneurship and low taxes, now started calling themselves “conservatives.”

        Jump forward to the 60s where a new Democratic party, lead by Harry Truman advanced a platform of civil rights, which drove the Southern Democrats to form the Dixicrats. This is followed by Nixon’s “southern strategy” to bring the conservative southern voter, now disenfranchised by their parties move towards civil rights into the Republican party.

        So can you see the future now? Can you see how useless it is to try and compare the Parties of even 50 years ago to todays? The old Republican party made some great leaps in the civil rights movement, but that is not the Republican party of today.

      • Ted Crawford

        Robert Byrd democrat and KKK member

      • eddie47d

        That was also more than 60 years ago. Time to move on.

      • Jovianus

        Whoa….nice civility you guys show in this place. A friend turned me onto this place last week, and now, without warning or comment, his replies are not published…seems censorship is alive and well in a place that calls itself a free discussion area. Must be a conservative version of free discussion. So I’ve decided to carry the flag.

        Sally is absolutely correct and stated a well written opinion.

        Overall, Palin is an empty head. She is not suited for any office other than perhaps President of her local PTA. She has built up her image where she has cashed in making millions (which was the reason she resigned her governorship no matter what her superficial reasons were. She knew her time to make millions had come).

        Getting back to civility. If any moderate or liberal responded with such language, it is certain they’d be kicked off this site. The censorship has been done already with at least three moderates…and their replies and comments are nowhere near the childishness displayed today alone.

        Have a nice day and we can chat soon.

      • libertytrain

        Am guessing your “friend” perhaps has gotten caught up in automatic spam for words that may be inappropriate or perhaps attacked in a way covered by the rules of this site. You know better than anyone just from reading this site, all sides are represented.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        libertytrain,
        how much you want to bet his “friend” is dogma free and dogma free too??

      • libertytrain

        I think you might win the bet.

      • Deanna

        I couldnt agree more Mr. P!!!

    • Laurie, Haslet, TX

      Sally
      you really need to stop listening to the LEFT WING NUT MEDIA – they are lying to you and have been lying to you.

      The PROGRESSIVES THINK EVERYONE is stupid and are unable to make any decisions for themselves. They believe that they are THE ONLY PEOPLE who can make decisions for you.

      Instead of blindly following the LIES – do the research and FIND THE TRUTH! Watch or listen to FOX, Glenn or Rush – then look at how the LEFT completely distorts what they are actually saying.

      The question you have to ASK yourself – WHAT IS IT THE LEFT DOES NOT WANT ME TO HEAR? Its called the TRUTH!

      Millions have done this and found the LEFT to be lying – that is why the LEFT lost on Nov 2nd.

      • Ian Burton

        And what “LIES” did she blindly state miss Laurie? And the fact that you use the term “progressives” interchangeably with any form of liberalism shows that you probably are not very well versed in the multiple FACETS of political ideology. There isn’t just “us” and “them”, nothing is black and white, and we should return to a moderation in our political discourse.

        And Laurie, you challenged Sally to watch Fox to learn the truth; I challenge you to read some Pol. Sci. articles that are peer-review and published in a journal.

      • Laurie, Haslet, TX

        Where did I state that Sally was lying?

      • Ian Burton

        I never said you intend that Sally was lying directly, but rather stating or “..blindly following the LIES – do the research and FIND THE TRUTH!”.

        You kind of missed the point, too many people feel that they “own” their opinion, or that the beliefs are like possessions, I was challenging you to see the fluidity in belief, but I fear it may have been to deaf ears.

      • eddie47d

        Duh,Your whole article!

      • Laurie, Haslet, TX

        This is YOUR comment IAN
        “And what “LIES” did she blindly state miss Laurie?”

        you SAID that I said Sally was lying. I said the LEFT WING MEDIA is lying.

        It takes an open mind to see the truth – to look at both sides of the argument apply common sense and see what is REALLY happening in our country.

        And your comment about reading Political Science journals – what makes you assume I am NOT EDUCATED?

        By the way the POL SCI journals are written by PROGRESSIVES.

        And no being LIBERAL is not being a PROGRESSIVE as you seem to believe is my opinion.

        Progressives assume they are the ONLY smart people and the rest of us are stupid so they have to tell us WHAT TO THINK.

      • JeffH

        Laurie, Haslet, TX…very good, I that was a “slam dunk”! These liberals, or should I say these supporters of the Marxist/socialist/communist ideology, are always making assumptions and take great pride in putting “words” in someone else’s mouth. As you can tell by the responses, they are quite “sensitive” about labels, especially the ones that fit!

      • Ian Burton

        I chose not to respond back, and I never intend to put words in her mouth, if that happened it wasn’t my doing. She was missing my point totally so I had given up. People statistically are more likely to receive their News from like-minded sources, which further alienates them from the middle. I often try to look at current events from all sides (ergo I’m here) and I was challenging to do the same.

        But she has a believe that scholarly reviewed sources are controlled by “progressives” as they are known so there was no use for me to continue trying to engage her in a civil discussion.

      • Jana

        Ian,
        The leftist leaning group are calling themselves Progressive. It is the “New Term”. By any name they are liberal, they are socialists, and embrace the communists among them. They want to change our country from its Standards and turn us into a Socialist country.
        Most of us do comprehend what is going on, some choose not to see it.

      • Dan az

        Modern liberalism is a leftist and nihilistic rebellion against the inherently unequal nature of the human condition. If we conservatives named this ideology for what it is, we would have a fair chance to defeat it or at least stem its advance. But if we go on imagining that leftists are liberals who share with us a common moral consensus as Americans—if we continue to regard their hateful assaults on us and our institutions as expressions of “silly” political correctness rather than of their fundamental drive to abolish our system of government and destroy us as a people, then we will be unable to oppose them in any way that counts, and they will keep driving us and our civilization backwards, step by step, until finally nothing remains. If we are effectively to oppose modern liberalism with its destructive double standards, we must oppose it on principle.

      • ImWithStupid

        Dear jesus, please do not reproduce.

      • Lewis Munn

        He did not reproduce anything but the ideas of truth and love and peace.

        Contrary to what the Left usually says of Christianity.

        But they will not listen, will they? Or research, either, lest the Truth make them free!

      • Kinetic1

        Laurie,
        Please, Beck is the king of distortion. Just listen as he tries to re-write history. Join him as he and his mentor David Barton produce “facts” that prove Jefferson was a devout Christian! Pay no attention to the Jeffersonian scholars (you know, those folks who have actually devoted their lives to the study of Jefferson’s life?) who have debunked everything Barton has presented. This is a Christian nation, no matter what our founding fathers said! Fox has done a great job of providing content and commentators that reinforce what people WANT to believe, despite the facts.

      • Curtis

        Faux News… has been caught in so many deceptive journalistic practices it’s sad… but their sheep don’t notice ‘cuz it feeds them what they want to hear. I loved the Bill O’Reilly segment when he asked the atheist to explain the mystery of the tides. Bill: “Tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication. You can’t explain that.” (@1:51) Oh really O’Reilly? Most grade schoolers know that the tides are influenced by the gravitational pull of the sun and the moon… it has nothing to do with god. The tides are predictable… there are tables that are produced that KNOW when high tide and low tide will occur. YES, you CAN explain the tides and there’s no need for a ‘god’ to make the tides happen.
        Watch the entire O’Reilly train wreck here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XEgkViLbTk&feature=player_embedded#!

      • JeffH

        Curtis, you’re reaaaaaalyyyy reaching with this one. LMAO! You can certainly do better than that.

        The tides? Hah! Give me a break, the athiest promoting Silverman didn’t refute O’Reilly over that question, never attempted to. O’Reilly asked him to explain the tides in and out and he wouldn’t go there.

        As for any gradeschooler answering the same question, I beg to differ. My nephews kids, 8 and 12 didn’t know the answer and their three freinds, same ages, didn’t know the answer. The wife didn’t know as well as two of the kids father. I’d say that a lot of people couldn’t answer that question without thinking long and hard, unless they were raised around tidal waters or boats.

      • Deanna

        Laurie, Right on tell it like it is!!

    • 2WarAbnVet

      Pleas stop calling poor Sally names. It’s not her fault she has been Obamtomized.

    • Bruce D.

      It amazes me how much the left fear Sarah Palin. You would not think this loving mother and wife from an unpopulated state could possible create that kind of fear in the left. It is not the cross hairs they fear though. It is her unyielding attack on their leftest ideology. I think Conservative woman are an emerging and an amazing force that will not be so easily dismissed. Conservative woman are good role models and have been eroding much of the liberal base despite liberals trying to paint a very different picture..

      • http://aol Bill

        Democrats don’t fear Palin, they love her. They all want her to run for president to insure a landslide win for Obama.

      • meteorlady

        Then why the constant attacks? Why the lies and hatred? Why even listen to her or give her publicity if she’s such a non-event?

      • Kinetic1

        Palin makes news, and news makes money. I don’t care to listen to her, but it’s difficult when everything she says is repeated 100 times a day in the media. And once you hear what nonsense she has spouted to day, it’s difficult not to comment.

        Do I fear Sarah Palin? No. Do I fear that she is a symbol of our nations downward spiral towards uneducated jingoistic rhetoric taking the place of real news? You betcha!

      • Deanna

        Kinetic, She would be a lot better than that soci-commi in office now I fear for where our country will be in 5-10 years and feel sorry for my kids and everyone else’s!!!

      • Bruce D.

        Thanks for clarifying what liberal love is all about Bill. Most of us already felt that liberal loved evolved are deceit.

      • Bruce D.

        …liberal love evolves around deceit.

      • marvin

        Bill
        i bet the love for palin from you is running down your legs and is brown

      • meteorlady

        Nothing intelligent to add? Well then just insult…..

      • JeffH

        marvin, you’ll have to ask Chris Matthews about that, that’s his line.

      • Jana

        Of course CNN would publish that Palin’s popularity has dipped. This is what the left wants us to think.

        Like Psalm 37:32 says, The wicked watcheth the righteous and seeketh to slay him. (They are trying to slay her with their words and evil portrayals.

        Again though I am comforted because Psalm 37:12 -15 puts it so appropriately,

        The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him (her) with his teeth 13. the Lord shall laugh at him, for He seeth that his day is coming. 15. Their sword shall enter their own heart and their bows shall be broken.
        All of their accusations and rantings and ravings will get them nowhere in the end.

      • Lewis Munn

        …And the people evil in their hearts will pay just as much attention now to those who speak truth as they did back then!

      • barbm

        i’m so far right, i make reagan look like a commie, and i wouldn’t vote for palin for pta president. am i afraid of her? no, because i don’t think she has a snowball’s chance in hades of getting nominated for 2012. we, in texas, had a fabulous tea party gubernatorial candidate, debra medina. instead of coming here and supporting medina, palin threw her support to the rino incumbent rick perry. and glenn beck sabotaged medina on his show – he works with palin, you know. after he threw her under the bus, he even said on the air that he wanted to french kiss rick perry. but, no, he wasn’t helping his little buddy, perry. my big old fat white behind he wasn’t. i’ll never listen to his show or trust anything he says again.

      • Lewis Munn

        Liberals tend to fear anything that could disturb their ideas. I have noted that since grade school days. They cover it, but I lived with it through school.

        I do note these days the “liberals” generally are those who want to be “liberal” with my money, not their own!

        Maybe some knowledgable “Liberals” can tell me when the meaning changed from being liberal with their own to being liberal with mine??

    • meteorlady

      Obviously you live in a big city and have never been anywhere where people are self-sufficient and hunt for food. These are common saying and are part of the culture of the area. I live in Texas and we also talk about hitting the bulls eye and taking aim, for people to get up in arms so much that they accuse here of causing the shootings makes me sick. This country is getting nastier and nastier when people disagree. We used to work together and now we have polarized so much that people can’t even talk civilized to each other. People like you, city people, need to understand that people like me, country people, live a different life culturally. We expect to help out in the community, we volunteer and we help our neighbors through hard times. That’s the same in Alaska, the people care about each other. City people just go to work and talk about spending my money to help out the less fortunate. They don’t pitch in and help, they just expect the government to do it for them.

      In this case, if you want to place blame, blame the poor lost person who did it. Blame the government and the liberal media for whipping up racism, divisions, and labeling people right or left. But hey, to people like you the government is always the solution right?

      • marvin

        meteorlady
        well said i like you grew up in the country and have been a hunter all my life,to me gun control is hitting what you shoot at

      • mary ann from maine

        I also go hunting and ew eat what we get i would like to go hunting with sarah palin

      • JeffH

        Ditto that mary ann.

      • DB

        HOW MUCH DID SHE PAY A POUND FOR THAT “WILD GAME”????
        I’LL BET OVER $1000.00. THREE AIRPLANES, HUNTING TAGS,A HUNTING GUIDE,THATS NOT RURAL AMERICA. THAT WAS AN ELITIST HUNTING TRIP.

      • meteorlady

        See that’s what I mean by nastiness. You can’t just accept the fact that they hunt, and they eat and use what they kill? None of that costs anything much except to get out in nature and enjoy the day and camping trip. I just get in my car or truck, go out the ranch, kill a white tail and have it processed for meat. We eat that through the year and it’s good to know that I didn’t have to go to the grocery store all the time to get my protein. I’m self sufficient, you are not. What happens if they cut off your meat supply? Which, by the way it getting harder to come by since we are now using cattle feed to make fuel for cars when we have huge supplies of natural gas. You city people are in for a rude awakening when you can’t get your veggies because the land is now producing corn and soy beans.

      • Cliffystones

        Not to mention that most of the restrictions placed on hunters come from the leftists in our government bureaucracy.

        Even on so called “public land” you are severely restricted as to when , where, what species, etc. For the last few years it ‘s been very easy to get Elk tags for the first season here in Colorado due to the economy, increasing restrictions and the cost of tags for non-residents.

      • Jana

        meteorlady,
        Well said, oh so very well said. Plus they couldn’t possibly get their little dainty fingers dirty, nor even dare protect themselves or their families.

      • Stan Lee

        DB:
        You mean “elitist” like ex-Speaker Pelosi’s formerly reserved and dedicated only to her whims, Air Force transcontinental air liner, so she could fly back to ‘Frisco without refueling in “fly-over country?” Imagine, an entire AF flight crew and ground crew, plus security, all on exclusive “stand-by” at Dulles Int’l (not an AF base) for Madame Pelosi!
        Is that the kind of “elitist” you mean, DB? :) :)

      • JeffH

        DB, your comment just shows your ignorance about hunting and hunters.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        JeffH,
        I wonder how much a pound DB pays for beef and pork that is full of antibiotics and hormones?? She got what, about 300 pounds of meat from that bull elk? Let’s see, at 2.50 a pound for beef, that would be 750 dollars for very lean, great tasting meat, which elk is! That would also be an average, as some of the cuts of beef are as high as 7.00 a pound!! I was told by a medical research service from my insurance that venison and other wild game are much, much better for you fat wise than either pork or beef!! I would say 1000 to 2000 dollars for the trip was a bargain, and an eleitist I am definately NOT!!!

      • JeffH

        JoeH., not to mention the hunting experience and the time she got to spend with her father…plane flight $600 bucks…experience-priceless!

      • Lewis Munn

        DB,

        How much did you pay for the computer and accessories to strikei out at other people?

        ASnd while you condemn someone who has money for doing what they want with it, not what you might, I wonder what “vices” you spend your money on that if I knew I would condemn as wasteful, etc.

        I kinda suspect you would condemn me for spending some of my limited resources helping directly a poor family, rather than shooing them off to the Public Assistance office to fill in piles of forms and sign their lives away. And I not right?

        Government assistance is not nearly so rewarding as helping directly where you know the needs, and can help as needed, not as prepackaged like it or lump it bureaucracy.

        If I am wrong, feel free to say so.

      • Kinetic1

        meteorlady,
        What a load of simplistic trash. I have lived in the big city and in small communities. I have lived alongside folks who have never seen an animal slaughtered, and those who hunt for their food. Never, ever have I found that city people were less likely to help their neighbors in the next apartment any less than small town folks will come to the aid of a neighbor across the pasture. It’s these sorts of “us vs. them” views that keep the pot boiling.

      • Jana

        Kinectic1,
        It seems you do an awful lot of ‘pot boiling’ yourself.

      • Lewis Munn

        Nothing tastier than a well boiled pot for supper!! Lots of iron in it too, builds red blood.

      • Jana

        LOL,
        But the left forgets that besides red blood they need a good backbone, not just a big mouth.

      • Lewis Munn

        No, they think the only solution is what’s left! They abhor even the word “right”.

    • Jovianus

      Well stated

    • marvin

      Sally
      like your liberal view point ,you say what you want ,palin has the same right as you or any other american citizen,as for gun this country was founded on god guns and guts ,with the loss off anyone of the three you and i both lose are right to speak out would i take a gun to a meeting, demm straigh i would it is my constitutional right to if i choose, and you have the same right not to ,so don,t be stuped and try place blame on someone for your action,mad men and womam do bad things and don,t need you or i to incourage them ,that like saying you or your girl is pregnent and it was not your fault lest you where raped it is your fault not mine not palin not bush,so manup liberal put the blame where the blame should be

    • bhscpa

      Another case of Palin Derangement Syndrome. The lying liberal media is very good at their job.

    • Cliffystones

      Sally,

      For all of us inbred redneck yokels, would you please define the term “assault weapon”?

      I can leave my AR-15 loaded all day, carry it around, lay it on a table, or snuggle with it in bed if need be. And it has never “assaulted” anybody! Do you suppose my AR is a closet liberal?

      I just loathe the terms assault rifle/weapon. Another left-wing trigger term designed to make the uninformed think that the guns themselves are somehow dangerous or responsible for the actions of the people (mis) using them.

      • Lewis Munn

        Better lock it up in a safe in a locked closet! It might sneak out and go on a murder rampage if you do not have it under your personal control at all times…or better yet, hire a Liberal to guard it at all times.

        Maybe even hire an illegal alien to guard it! Pay him good, as a Liberal says they would!

      • JeffH

        Cliffystones…reminds of the time when Diane Feinstein was pushing her anti-gun rhetoric at a press conference to ban “assault weapons”.
        Holding an SKS and calling it an AK-47…oh so typical.

    • wandamurline

      Sarah Palin is not the enemy here…the enemy lies within the progressive liberal medias (notice I did not call them news). Andrea Mitchell was the first out the chute to start pointing fingers without any shred of evidence…and still there is no evidence to verify any of what she said. Had I been Palin, I would not have made the video…I would have just sued the pants off Mitchell for slander and liabel…you see, even the press has to report something of the truth of which there is none to support the progressive liberal’s attacks on the Tea Parties, Republicans or Palin,Beck, etc. Pleeeeese stop drinking the koolaide and get yourself sobered up…then maybe you can actually see the truth. Of yeah, we are still waiting on the video that showed the Tea Partiers spitting on the Black Caucus and calling them the “n” word…the reason is simple…it did not happen…it is the lies of the liberals. When they want to get your vote, they simply make up lies and spread them around, cannot justify anything, just keep lieing. Maybe that is why CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS and NBC have the lowest watching audience in their history…they are owned by George Soros…I do not watch them anymore. When they start reporting the news instead of their view of the news, maybe then…but don’t look for it to happen anytime soon.

    • Jim

      Sally, are you out of your freakin mind or are you really that stupid. Perhaps you are just so blind to the facts that no matter what is said all you can do is parrot the liberal agenda. What ever was said by Palin, Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh or any other conservative it had no more to do with the shooting in Tuscon than you did. In all of Palins speeche she has never called for anyone to be killed, something that can’t be said for many of the Liberals. Why don’t you get you facts straight befor you spout off and shouw just how ignorant you are.

      • Stan Lee

        Jim:

        “Forgive them for they know not what they do.”
        Next week, they’ll probably be blaming the Fuller Brush guy or the Amway lady for not being civil bcause they’re not unionized! :) :)

    • Dogma-Free Too

      Spin, Vanna…spin!!

      hahaha…I love the spin they try to put on this…like the Libs had anything to do with air-head Palin’s popularity dropping…you know, as opposed to the fact that she made things worse for herself by trying to take advantage of a GUN SLAYING that SHE HELPED CAUSE!

      She is so utterly shameless, that she actually tried to make it sound as though she herself was a ‘victim’ of the horrible MASS GUN SLAYING in Tucson…and like I said, she had a major part in bringing that MASS GUN SLAYING about in the first place.

      She should be held accountable, and charged as an accomplice in the MASS GUN MURDERS that happened that day.

      And, by the way…for the mindless NRA crowd…do you ever happen to notice how there are no mass stabbings…or mass deaths by stoning…??

      No, of course not…why would anyone be bothered with those ineffectual, and inefficient things, when they can just waltz into a GUN store, and regardless of mental state, just buy the GUN of their choosing…and to make it even more convenient to KILL WITH, they choose to buy a bigger CLIP (or ‘magazine’, to the anal-retentive) to hold even more ammo (or ‘ammunition’ or ’rounds’, to same said anal-retentive folks), so that they can just keep pulling the trigger, and consequently, KILLING MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE WITH THEIR GUNS!

      Honestly, people…pull your heads out of the warm, dark, and dusky place you have them currently lodged in, and give them a good, hard shake.

      You don’t need to live your lives in pant-wetting, McCarthy era fear anymore.

      • JeffH

        Dog, another baseless liberal rant. Isn’t it breaktime yet?

      • castaway

        Nor do I need a gun to cap your ass buddy! If I decided to end your existance on this planet I do not need to go to the gun store for a means. Guns are available everywhere and cheap. But who needs a gun. I sure don’t. There are many much more effective ways than using a gun. Remove all the guns, think you are safe?? Not a chance. However if you are packin heat, you will have a better chance of protecting yourself for sure.

        In addition, if you really believe Palin is responsible for this nutcase that shot those people in Arizona, you are just like him. A nutcase yourself and should be locked away in a rubber room.This guy had bad things going on long before Palin appeared on stage. You are just another coward from the liberal la la land.

      • Lewis Munn

        You err, Sir Leftie.

        Getting stoned is the cause of many more civilian deaths than gunfire. Teens getting stoned and driving murder millions of innocent victims in public on our roads.

        Do you deny that?

        Oh, do you let your Dogma run free without a leash? ASPCA might like to know.

      • eddie47d

        I will deny that 100% Lewis Munn. Total driving deaths in America is around 42,000 and has remained the same for at least 30 years. Alcohol accounted for 17,941 of those deaths in 2010.That figure has also remained about the same over the last 30 years but slightly higher in 2010. The major cause for teen deaths is distractions (cell phones,texting,talking to friends). Not drugs.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        gee eddie, I suppose now you want to do away with those dangerous cell phones, too??? Watch it, if a teen is on the phone and distracted he could kill 8 or 9 and injure 10 or 12!!! Ban those dangerous cell phones!!!!

      • eddie47d

        Joe; You show so much baffling ignorance and there is so little time to deal with you and that crooked mouth.

      • John Woodbury

        Hey Dogwhatever, I am not a fan of Palin, but your crazy rant does not help your case at all. The shooting was caused by PERSONAL vendetta against the Congresswoman, what part of PERSONAL do you not understand?

      • Allan Halbert

        What we have today is the new McCarthyism — virulent, self-serving political correctness now being perpetrated by the left. 50 years later they are looking for the politically incorrect behind every bush. The communists now trying to weed out the elements of a free society.

    • castaway

      She has her shit together, and that is more than I can say for you and other liberal sheepies like you. As they say, No brains no pain!!!!

    • JUKEBOX

      I haven’t seen any shootings at those gun toting rallies Sally. Your thinking might change if you spent a few weeks with the Palin family, and see how real people live, and not just the pseudo intellectual elites in DC. You probably would act like Kate Goslin.

    • Allan Halbert

      Ya know, businesses having been putting targets on maps for years. Even United Way did for its fundraising campaigns. This political correctness is hypocritical and disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    • http://gunner689 gunner689

      only a nitwit would misinterrput what she meant.

    • EddieW

      Sarah Palin is possibly a traitor…her mentor is Kissinger, who advocated spraying E-bola on big cities, to kill the population…to lower the population!! Probably no one left to bury them is the reason they didn’t do it!! I don’t know if she is CFR or not, but would bet she is, so might as well keep Obaba!!!
      Big problem coming up this summer, please pass this on to all your friends!!
      China is devaluing the dollar by 30%…other countries will soon follow suit!! By summer we can expect a 30% inflation rate, for clothing, gas, oil, electronics, and most importantly FOOD!!
      .
      If you can afford to, and have a cool place to store it, pick up some Freeze Dried foods…They will last 25 years! Dehydrated needs spices, which could be hard to locate!
      My favorite Freeze Dried food company is…beprepared(dot)com.. Rule 1….Buy things you like to eat!!!

      • John Woodbury

        EddieW, I like you are trying to prepare, but I have news for the Chinese want a storng dollar, the FED is dropping the value of the dollar.

    • Al Sieber

      B.S., Sally, where’s your proof? I don’t like NEO-Cons at all. both parties are the same.

    • steve

      Palin is a loose cannon, a wacko and a nutcase. She is also a quitter. She took an oath when she became Governor of Alaska and she broke it when she went Hollywood. A public servant she is not. What a loser.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom