There is no place for a civilian judge to issue a ruling within the military. The Military has its own judicial system, and everyone else needs to stay out of it. We don’t even need reporters going to war and showing the world what goes on. All we need to know is that our military kicked ass or not. if we are in a “war” then fund them, help them out every way you can, but rulings like this make soldiers worried about stuff they don’t need to. Their lives are at stake and activists are just making it that much more difficult.

Stay out of the military and let them be the “Bad-asses” we need right now, and I guarantee you they will do just fine. They have thus far.

THE 9TH CIRUIT COURT IS ONE OF THE WORST IN THE COUNTRY. IF SOMEONE ON THE LEFT WANTS A DECISION IN THEIR FAVOR, THIS IS WHERE THEY GO. I BELIEVE WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD DEMAND FROM OUR REPRESENTATIVES THE ELIMINATION OF LIFE TIME APPOINTMENTS AND OUR REPRESENTATIVES START DOING THEIR JOBS WITH CLEANING UP THE MESS IN DC. WE HAVE ELECTIONS TO BE USED FOR TERM LIMITS. LET’S PUT THE JUDGES ON THE SAME BALLOTS. .

WHAT THE HECK DOES “NO ASK – NO TELL” GOT TO DO WITH FREE SPEACH ???? Does the member say hello before it’s inserted into the tunnel to make whoopi………By the way won’t high heels cause a marching problems. Klinger was funny, but this is REAL AND SICKENING.

Our country is turning into joke. This is another nail in our coffin and we had better get busy stopping all of this crap and insanity. If not it’s all lost and we can rename the country the USSA.

As I recall, America’s “first” black prez [Bubba Clinton] was in the White House when DADT started. It was implemented to aim a pc body blow to the military, and make lots of new ‘friends’ at the same time.
If a judge thinks it’s now unconstitutional, then aren’t we being fed mixed messages on purpose? It sure sounds as though some people refuse to be happy. I have to conclude that no matter how flexible you try to be, bending over to ‘please’ others just isn’t worth the trouble.
Common sense would seem to dictate that if gays didn’t try to get into the military, the old issue would be solved, they could get on with their lives
and the military would no longer be bothered with a bs issue that shouldn’t exist in the first place.

As I write this, the Appeals Court has stayed the order, so DADT is still in effect.

If openly gay folks are allowed to serve, I wonder what will happen the first time a Muslim member of the US military is accosted by a gay fellow serviceman. If the Muslim commits a violent act against the gay in reprisal, which side will the military justice system support?

This judge is clearly wrong. DADT as implemented is in compliance with the First Amendment’s first clause. it does not make any religion recognized and it dies not prohibit the free exercise of any religion.

Repeal of DADT, however clearly violates the First Amendment by recognizing and giving precedence to the religion of Atheism. It also violated the free practice of religion of anyone who believes that homosexuality is prohibited by his faith.

It seems that DADT is constitutional and repealing DADT is what is unconstitutional.

Well, Oblama did say he wanted to cut the military by 25%. And for some odd reason, 25% of the military said they would resign rather than serve with openly gay people.

Now that the adoration of the ONE is slowly diminishing it might have to take a banana
Republic revolution remove those clowns from office.
Keep your powder dry!

AS LONG AS GOVERNMENT ELECTED PEOPLE PUT UP WITH THIS OUT OF CONTROL JUDGE OPINION, THE FURTHER WE ASCEND OR DECEND INTO THE BRITISH RULE BY THE COURTS…CONSTITUTION PUTS THE CONTROLS IN THE SENATE, HOUSE, NOT THE JUDICIARY, BUT THESE WARPED MINDED JUDGES SEEM TO THINK THEY RULE THE WORLD. EVER WONDER WHY A JURY? IT IS TO OVERRIDE THE JUDGE IF HE IS OUT OF ORDER, REMEMBER, WE THE PEOPLE? STILL WE THE PEOPLE, BUT LOOKS LIKE SOME MUSCLE WOULD REAFFIRM THAT TO THESE GLORIFIED LITTLE PIP SQUEAKS WHO CLAIM SO MUCH AUTHORITY…

Life time appointments for anything, are always wrong. Nobody is all wise and indespensible. Term limits, for anyone one in any government position is warrented. Congress need to leave the 2 years for representivies, 6 years for a senator, but make them sit out twice the years they served before running again and cannot be lobbyists of any type with state of federal government entities or have any contact. Violate the standards and get 20 year mandatory jail sentence and become a felon, of course that would keep the democrat party in plenty of party leaders.

My concern is not so much about right and wrong as it is that a judge can over rule congress and interpret our constitution any way they please.Life time appointments should be abolished.As long as this nation remains as a democracy whether we like it or not The Majority should rule not the minority.

Just more of the pusifing of the American males and society. Since the chocolate muslim overeducated lab pooch keeps promoting more segregation and muslims and fuitcakes. For puke minorities. The best thing is to create a muslim faggot battalion to do the pick road ditches and laterine construction. It will be called the “Lavender Rug Rumpers” motto “Ideological Perverts Who Stink”.

With a tiny bit of common sense congress this judge should be impeached. Her misuse of constitution has NO authority. The federal government taks pentagon with job to protect country. They make rules and regulations to do such. Keep the liberal queer judges out of our business. Why was military given right to own UCMJ to control and manage their activities? All gays have ever wanted is attention, any way they can get it. too bad this country has lost a simple thing, “common Sense”

I agree completely with Tony Perkins. This judge is playing politics. If anything, HER actions are unconstitutional. She has taken over the constitutional job of the Congress AND ignored the expert advice of those truly involved…the chiefs of the military branches. Social “correctness” (HER DEFINITION) comes before national security? I THINK NOT!

The wording caught my attention. Exactly what is an “openly gay” service member?? By definition wouldn’t that be like “pink and lavender camo?? high-heel boots?? Kevlar fish-nets?? goo-goo eyes at your fox-hole buddy??” I don’t see how order can be retained on this one-way tolerance street.

This is not about civil rights or even gay rights. This is instead an invasion of our conservative minded military by left leaning America haters who also happen to be gay. First infiltrate with the intent to dominate and our military will go the way media, education and government has gone. The architects of “Political Correctness” must be laughing from their graves with amazement at how sucessful their communist subversion plan dubbed “Political Correctness” is working.

All of these West Coast federal judges are a bunch of mindless jerks who will be up against the wall when the Revolution comes.

Do these West Coast federal judges have the power to ignore the Separation of Powers provisions in the United States Constitution? They must act only for the area of their own jurisdiction.

More legislation from the bench. We really need a strong Congress that will tell the judiciary that enough is enough.

Can’t find my copy of the Constitution right now but there’s an article in it that allows Congress to override any decision made by a federal court. To my knowledge, it’s never been invoked. Now is the time.

It’s estimated that at least 24% of our military will be lost due to resignations and refusal to reenlist because of this. Why is less than 3% of the population, acknowledged perverts, allowed to dictate?

Here’s a suggestion: Suspend all new enlistments until this foolish ruling is overturned.

This weakening nation just got more weaker.Who will want to be in a military with people who flout their gay lifestyle..who can use their rank to harass someone,think of the gay military parades and what they’ll do to the uniforms and the shameful behavior,lack of morals,lack of discipline that will enter.I don’t understand why they have to serve as gays and not simply as people..why is it an issue who you sleep with..homosexuality is not a civil right..this society has become so twisted and lost and now perverted.God Bless America..I think not.

This is another example of this administration ignoring the constitution. The military is controlled only by congress which sets regulations and governs the military. The UCMJ was established to put in rules of conduct. The rest of the constitution does not affect the military. They are not subject to the courts.

Well_ I wonder how long before they renege this!_This immature, indecisive Administration can’t seem to make up its mind, on anything except the destroying America!__ C’mon November!!_-Lets for God’s sake, get some common sense going on!