Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty Digest™ 

The Germ Theory of Disease

November 17, 2008 by  

The Germ Theory of Disease

The germ theory of disease is a foolish hoax created by Louis Pasteur. It is a notion of nonsense that has confused millions of people and made billions for the pharmaceuticals with vaccines and tens of thousands of drugs or over-the-counter preparations.

If one person in society should die of a “contagious disease,” the whole world population would expire.

Well, what about the flu epidemic shortly after World War I that killed 80 million people worldwide? According to the germ theory of disease, this flu should have killed everyone on earth. Of course, it didn’t and some people died in the same household where others did not. Why did this so-called “infectious disease” not infect the entire world population?

The answer is that disease is born of us and in us. If our immune system is strong and healthy, we could sleep with people dying with “contagious disease” and never even get sick. What a relief this is to know, but how difficult it is to get people to believe!

The germ theory of disease is nothing in the world but a commercial enterprise.

Disease comes from within. When the body is overly fatigued with excess stress, toxins and malnutrition, there is a breakdown of immunity.

A person’s nutritional status and hydration level is the prime determinant of health. Disease comes from within!

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American who has been writing a newsletter since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “The Germ Theory of Disease”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Lindsay
  • John

    I have seen parents allow their children to be put on a roller coaster of antibiotics and they seem to always be sick and going back to the Dr.

    There have been two ocassions in my adult experience where such helped me.  One was a severe ear infection that got out of hand.  The other was an infection in a two bone after surgery.  In both situation the antibiotic helped almost immediately to get the infection under control.

  • Dan

    Do Antibiotics actually work to combat illness?

  • Dale

    Perhaps the answer lies amid the extremes. Bubonic plague and some other insidious diseases, if exposed enough to tear down the immune system, will kill you. Worry, fear, wrong stress (stress can be constructive or destructive – it has to be under your control, rather than controlling you), depression, inactivity, smoking, drinking (excessively),  excess toxins (toxin poisoning), lesser diseases, poor eating habits, excess weight, stored toxins in fatty areas (a proper amount of fat is good – lubricant for cells and stored energy), medication conflicts (some things just do not mix well with body chemistry and each other), etc——these are things that destroy immune systems and open the body to health issues.

    The balance is that the body is designed to last a long, long time!!!! Our own chemicals, lifestyle, eating habits, inactivity, etc. is the problem.

    How foods are processed can cause problems. One example is the homoginization process. Breaking down fat particles (eg – milk) into micro-particles may suspend the particles and prevent recombining of the oil into larger particles so that they won’t float or seperate from other liquids, but they also are so small that they can enter the blood stream.

    Another example is sugar. There is nothing wrong with natural sugar. It has a lot of nutrients and is good for you, orientals love pure sugar occasionally. We have white and brown sugar. White sugar is bleached and the nutrients are stripped away. Even mice and rats don’t like it. What about brown sugar? Sometimes it is white sugar with molasses added to it. Molasses is nutritive, so it is better for you, but not as good as if natural sugar were used.

    Also, water is great for you —- as long as it is handled right it is good for you. Chlorine plus water produces some HCL (hydrocloric acid). Chlorine kills off bacteria and makes water better for consumption. Flourine may be good for your teeth but it was used in large quantities by Adolph Hitler in WWII to subdue the people – make them more susceptable to social re-conditioning. Both of these are in city water. Some cities have excess of either or both of these chemicals and can be hard to drink and not good for the skin or digestive system. It is funny to ‘buy’ water at almost the cost of a cold drink so that you can get some water that tastes good.

    Doctors do their best to help the patients, not just make money. No doctor should remain in business if they are not sensitive to the needs of those they serve. However, the AMA (American Medical Institute) sets the standard for education of the doctors (and staff) and promotes the medical ‘myths’. Fortunately, they can’t seem to screw up the breakthroughs in surgical practices that do wonders. AMA is a Government Agency – enough said!! But I will anyhow! With the kickbacks and under the table deals with some pharmaceutical companies (some of the pharma is fantastic and real breakthroughs) the politicians will sell out the country to promote what does not work, or works but tears down the immune system also. After all, what good has come out of Congress the last few years, and now??? Far too many Dems and some of the Repubs are the biggest crooks – promoting lies! Don’t put politics above the ones you are ‘supposed’ to server DC!! (just a quick peeloff – but does pinpoint where most food regulatory problems come from!
     
    The most destructive things are hate and fear, either will tear down your immune system very quickly whereas the other things take time – even many years. In a sense, we are our own worse enemies!

  • SB Smith

    Growing up, our house was clean but my mom was not anal about it.
    As an adult over 40, my house now would Not win the clean house award.
    My excuse has always been that I’m keeping our immune systems on their toes. :-D

  • doktavian

    hi dave,

    i’m glad someone gave ken a taste of the medicine he hopefully understands,
    but on your correction you wrote:

    ( Ken: The correct spelling of your post would be, “You’re and idiot.” )
    i know you meant to write “You”re AN idiot.”
    And ken, your lucid and detailed explanation of why you believed you had the right to call the author an idiot was, well, nonexistent!
    If the author had answered your mean comment in a way that would have made the most clear sense to you, i think it might have sounded something like this,
    “I know you are, but what am I?”
    How’s that middle school working out for you there ken?
    ———————————————-
    The author has made very good points about the immune system.  There are even documented observations of Siamese twins with unshared circulatory/GIGU systems who have not shared the same flu.  It looks like it is all about the individual immune system.  Regarding vaccinations, I have a prediction that 3000 years from now they will regard the vaccination of our young with the same amazement we have when we think about the god Baal 3000? years ago who demanded that your first born child be sacrificed in a fiery alter for the good of agriculture/fertility. Everyone did it.  No one questioned the priests.  I think we need to continue to question the priests!  Thanks Mr. Livingston!
     
     
     
     

  • http://masterjules.net/aspirinflu.htm Lindsay

    Bill on November 18th, 2008 at 8:20 pm:
    Re: Germ THEORY.  Note that you can never PROVE a theory, and that is the only reason why there is no Germ Law.  And it is the same reason why there is a theory of gravity rather than a law of gravity; or why evolution is a theory.  Theories can only be supported by facts, and disproven; but never proven.”

    It is OK with me that Bill, not recognizing gravity as a law, floats towards the ceiling.

  • John

    P.S.

    The likely reason “germs” (ie, bacteria, viruses) affect some and not others is that we have varying strength and/or resilience in our immune systems.

    If our systems are working at high efficiency we have greater resistance and better recovery.  Avoiding toxins and maintaining good nutrition and hydration as well as optimal fitness goes a long way to self preservation.

  • Mark

    Hi Bob,

    I am currently attending college, studying to be an electrical engineer. As such, I am required to learn a wide variety of subjects; please allow me to comment…
    You are half wrong (or half right, depending on your perspective). Viruses and bacteria do indeed live inside our bodies all the time, but it is possible to receive a critical dose of germs from the outside world…for example, if you are sitting on a bus next to a coughing person, you will inhale millions of germs, thus greatly increasing your chances of “catching” the cough (the germs will undergo mitosis and exponentially increase in number once inside you) …the truth always lies in the middle. Outside germs and inside immune system strength both play their roles.

  • John

    I come to most subjects from a biblical worldview.  I have high respect for the Bible.  The overwhelming method of self-protection in ancient Israel was a careful diet and thorough washing.  They were not to allow human waste to be “in the camp” or tolerate molds or be around corpses, etc.

    God designed the human body to function in amazing ways.  We have a fabulous immune system.  It begins with our skin which is violently bypassed when we allow imunizations to go into the muscle or blood, and sadly many times in multiple different pathogens.

    I have 5 children who have not been vaccinated only ocassionally get a sniffle or ear ache.  We typically take them off of all dairy and sugary items and visit our chiropractor.  My 3 youngest have NEVER had an antibiotic.  Their school teachers have been surprised that even if they feel way the recover in record time without visiting an MD or taking drugs.

    Vaccines are questionable to say the least and thrive on an unproven THEORY.

  • http://www.personalliberty.com Bill

    Re: Germ THEORY.  Note that you can never PROVE a theory, and that is the only reason why there is no Germ Law.  And it is the same reason why there is a theory of gravity rather than a law of gravity; or why evolution is a theory.  Theories can only be supported by facts, and disproven; but never proven.

    • http://none Byrd

      Bill,

      I think you need to review the ‘Scientific Process’. If you can’t prove your Theory, then it isn’t a very good Theory is it?
      Oh, what about the ‘Laws of Thermodynamics’, ‘Laws/Axioms of Logic’, and so on. Theories do get proved Law, assuming they are correct. Many that you mentioned are highly controversial and easily debatable, that’s why they are still Theories.

      Thanks and God Bless,
      Michael Byrd

  • Bev

    I totally agree with the ones who do not sterilize their homes. Mine is not sterile by any matter of means and we are less sick than a lot of our neighbors who run around spraying Lysol and Chlorox all day. We have discovered that having a flu shot gives us the flu, but by eating more onions and garlic we are much healthier for it.

    A good example of the properties of onions and horseradish is my dad. He was an artesian well driller for many years. All he took for sandwiches was either raw onion or horseradish sandwiches. All the years he worked outside in snow, sleet, freezing rain, rain and all the other garbage that Mother Nature could throw at him here in New England, he never once took a day off from work sick. He never had a sniffle!!! We still use this and for the most part, we are healthier for it.

    Lets stop all this germ warfare and go back to the old adage that a kid that plays in the dirt and comes home dirty is a healthy kid!!!!! Mine are!!

  • Doug

    We are reaping what we have sown, and the way in which we sowed it. We have decided to follow mans ways, and not GODS ways. The farmers used to rely on GOD to grow their crops, now they have rejected GOD and HIS ways and are doing it mans way and using chemicals, chemicals which are killing you slowly. This is destroying your immine system. There is no nutritional value in the food that we are now eating, so coupled with chemicals, you virtually are losing your ability to fight off even a cold, because you have an orchestrated attack on your immune system. Unless you are eating organic grown foods, and taking other natural, non irradiated, non homogenized supplements you fighting a losing battle. The bottom line is this, eat organic fruits and vegetables, and grains and get a personal relationship with the GOD or you are living on borrowed time, frought with disease and much suffering. 

  • TeresaE

    Right on!

    Truth in a health article.

    If vaccines, drugs and radiated foods were truly “saving” us, America would not be the sickest place on earth, with the most out of control health care costs.

    But we are.

    And supplements are only part of the equation.  Live food, is a big piece missing from our lives.  Nearly everything an American eats is processed, altered and full of chemicals or high fructose corn syrup. 

    Our diets make us sick and vulnerable, then we run to our doctors who push drugs on us that make us sicker and more vulnerable.

    Many vaccinations are poison and actually increase the odds of getting other illnesses–illnesses more dangerous than the illness the vaccine is supposed to protect you from.

    Yet, we our children, and ourselves, up to be sickened.

    Not me, not anymore

    Thanks for the nice article Bob.

  • http://LibertyAlert Dr. G

    Certainly, using herbal suppliments and getting excercise while avioding pathogens will dramatically extend one’s life cycle as well as give that lifetime a high quality standing.  Even an “idiot” knows this, Ken.  Avoiding the over-medication reloving door (e.g., taking an anti cholesterol drug which forces a blood pressure drug which leads to a type-two diabetic drug that makes you impotent and requiring Viagra, etceteras) will greatly help as well.  HOWEVER, never-ever-never-ever blow off chemo treatments or proton therapy whilst in the throes of cancer.  There are definative benefits to both traditional medicines as well as preventative healthy lifestyles.  Common sense is the order of the day when it comes to healthcare.

  • http://masterjules.net/aspirinflu.htm Lindsay

    If the first poster were a scientist, he would understand that Germ Theory of Disease would now be the Germ Law of Disease, if the theory had ever actually proven to be correct.

    Just do a Google search on aspirin+1918+flu and you may learn something like this:
    http://masterjules.net/aspirinflu.htm

  • Pam

    My daughter hasn’t been to a doctor since she was 2 years old.  She’s bright, healthy, curious and quite outgoing.  She says, “We don’t go to the doctor because doctors are for sick people.”

  • Dave

    Ken:

    The correct spelling of your post would be, “You’re and idiot.”

    So please tell us why one who can’t correctly use a contraction to voice his complaint ought to be listened to – - at all?

    • http://www.sovereignsouth.wordpress.com xcesszeal

      I applaud you attempt at correction however, in your correction is incorrect: “you’re an idiot” is proper, not “you’re and idiot”.

  • Rick

    That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard!  If germs don’t cause disease then why is it possible to ‘weaponize’ infectious diseases like smallpox, anthrax, etc.  The notion that the entire world population would die from the flu is not logical either.  There are many factors that effect the way the virus/bacteria would get redistrubuted and thus a person living with an infected person would not necessarily get infected.

  • Chuck B

    If people keep believing that anti-bacterial products are helping them stay healthy, they need only to look at the”upper middle class”.  All the families i know in that class are ill most of the time.  When a soccer or hockey mom goes through the house three times a day spraying door knobs and cleaning surfaces with anti-bacterial cleaners, they are removing germs that the immune system needs to build anti-bodies.  Thus when the younger children leave the “bubble” even for a short time, they usually return with the beginnings of some sickness.  While working construction, I frequent many “germ spots”.  Hospitals, creamatoriums, nursing homes, etc.  I’ve never had a flu shot and never had the flu.  I’ve never taken ” preventitive steps or vaccines” and the worst thing I’ve gotten has been the chicken pox when I was 8.  Without germs humans wouldn’t survive.

  • Bill

    This makes sense. I am a retired health professional. I have also been using alternative preventive medicines  on myself. i have never contracted any of my patients illnesses. I have not been to a physician except for broken bones in over 50 years.

  • Harry

    It is difficult to believe that all people who died of small pox and the bubonic plague died from a poor immune response alone. Surely small pox vaccinations have saved millions of people.

    • http://none Byrd

      Harry,

      I think that you should check out the facts. There is no conclusive evidence that vaccines have helped out at all, in fact they may have actually infected more people. Also, the timeframe of Smallpox vaccinations just so happens to coincide with new standards of cleanliness, sanitation, A/C & refrigeration (less spoiled food), water treatment, and etc. Before vaccines can truly claim any part of the decreased number of infections, one must use the ‘Process of Elimination’ to eliminate many other factors that might have caused the decline of infection.

      Thanks and Peace be with you,
      Michael Byrd

      • Luke

        Byrd,

        Vaccines cannot infect people with disease, only toxins that don’t belong in the human body like murcury and aluminumm. By saying that you are accepting the foolish premise of the “germ theory of disease.” Furthermore, refrigeration and sterilization etc… were the beneficiarie$ of the faulty “germ theory.” (Cheese was a way to preserve milk… there is no reason to refrigerat it, it gets better and more nutritious when it goes bad) Sanitation has nothing to do with disease to the extent that a soiled environment doesn’t produce toxins. It’s the sanitation and nutrition inside your body that is important. Bacteria or “germs” are no match for healthy blood, tissue, organs etc….

  • Elizabeth

    What most people don’t realize is their bodies are factories for germs.  We have bacteria covering every inch of our bodies all the time inside and out.  By buying into the Clorox type advertising and the Dr. Oz type prosletizing, many people have fallen for the idea that antibacterial cleaners are going to keep you healthy.  It’s your imune system that keeps you healthy.

  • http://www.personalliberty.com Florida Girl

    Ken, regardless of whether you believe that which you read, name calling is completely uncalled for.  Man up and post an itelligent rebutal.  I’m sick of cowards hiding behind blog posts.  I guarantee you would not likely stand in front of Bob Livingston and make the same comment to his face… you’d find a diplomatic way to disagree.  Why is it impossible to do the same while sitting behind a computer screen?

    • http://noaa.gov James

      I think “idiot’ is a name called only for its brevity and accuracy with regards to this statement from Mr Livingston that it is in response to…. To use so few words to state clearly – ahh – if I only exercised that talent…
      So when Mr Livingston is going to be cut open for some urgent surgery, let the doctor dip his hands into a “Germ” infested stew (pretty much anything could qualify…) and instead of scrubbing with soap and water – with Mr. Livingston you would not have to – germs don’t cause disease! Even scrub with soap and water and afterwards, just allow the surgeon to touch the tongue of a flu suffering person before sticking his fingers inside Mr Livingston, and HEY – what would Mr Livingston have to fear, germs don’t cause anything! Well if you were to allow a surgeon to do just those things to you and someone called you an “idiot” – very few intelligent (or even barely informed) humans would argue with their choice of descriptive terminology – and the surgeon would probably be jailed for homicide later. The arrogant and snidely childish characterization of Pasteur et al, as conspiring to deceive and manipulate is shrill and embarrassing – don’t you think? If you could ask the ghosts of Gettysburg or Antietam to comment on the unwashed hands of their surgeons and the pronounced disparity of number wounded to number who survived those wounds – back just before washing hands became common (washing solely to “kill germs” my fellow geniuses…) I wonder the word choices those apparitions would select from their personal dictionaries of those long suffering days, at the hands of those pious preachers who reacted to the claims about germs as unseen by the naked eye and intended by our harsh creator to punish the sinful so washing your hands was cheating God from his due obeisance – or so said some clergy in response to the few courageous surgeons who did beg for hand-washing at the front, circa 1860s. How surprising to hear the echoes of those moronic puritan blowhards so arrogantly claiming to know Gods will from their unlearned fixation on a few lines of misunderstood and manipulated ancient text in a modern screed accusing Pasteur of some grave designs on fooling the masses into hygienic alertness. How surprising indeed to enjoy the study of history only to find it’s lamest villains arising so eagerly to repeat the past’s most blushing insanities and inanities. No wonder Walt Whitman’s poetry, after his time spent in those blood soaked field hospitals, took on such a hint of rage at the loudmouths of the day. But at least he could express himself with an aesthetic that lifted the heart, whereas I can only complain in a webpage comment section – forgive me my presumptive stumbling, Mr Livingston does sound like a fun to guy to have a beer and argue with I should add….. we’re all idiots in our own way now and again – aren’t we?? Tis’ courage to reveal this truth publicly (…sometimes, and sometimes something far baser than courage…) – this cry against germs – I am most unsure which……

      • http://www.eequalsmcsquared.auckland.ac.nz/sites/emc2/tl/thermodynamics/overview.cfm Michel

        Thermodynamics is derived from the Greek words Thermos meaning Heat and Dynamic, meaning Change. In the beginning, Thermodynamics was only applied to the relation between temperature, heat and work. One of its main tasks was to understand the processes that converted heat from steam into work and using this knowledge to make more efficient and more powerful steam engines.

        Nowadays, thermodynamics includes many more forms of energy, such as chemical, kinetic, electromagnetic, nuclear and radiant energy and its principles are widely used: from physics and chemistry to biology and economy.

        The history of thermodynamics starts with the industrial revolution. For the first time in history, mankind was able to power an engine with steam. Although it was clear that the amount of heat provided to the steam and the amount of work that was done were related, no one had a theory that described this relation in universal terms.

        Nicholas Léonard Sadi Carnot is often considered one of the founders of the laws of Thermodynamics. In 1824 he published a book called Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire and on Machines fitted to develop that Power. In this book he conducted a thought experiment that is now known as the Carnot cycle. From this experiment Carnot concluded that this reversible cycle was the most energy efficient way to create work from heat.

        Although it is now seen as the starting point of Thermodynamics, Carnot’s work was for a long time ignored by scientists and engineers. It took 12 years before Benoit Pierre Emile Clapeyron put Carnot’s thought experiment into mathematical equations. Now the theory could be tested in experiments.

        In 1850, Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius added the concept of entropy and irreversible processes to the theory. He used measurement data from James Prescott Joule to prove his theory. The new temperature scale defined by Lord Kelvin completed the classical thermodynamics.

        There are two main laws of Thermodynamics: the First and the Second law.

        The first law of Thermodynamics states that all energy in the universe is constant and that energy can only be transferred from one type of energy to another. Energy cannot appear out of nowhere or be lost during the process. With the discovery of radioactivity, the first law seemed to be broken. It was Einstein who showed with his famous E = mc2 equation that matter is also a type of energy, thereby explaining the results found for radioactive materials.

        The second law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy in the universe always increases and describes it as the driving force behind spontaneous processes. Entropy is the unit for disorder. Spontaneous reactions move from a state of order to a state of disorder.

        The laws of Thermodynamics are more generalized than almost any other theory as in principle it does not put any requirements on the building blocks of matter. This does not apply to Statistical Thermodynamics. Statistical Thermodynamics combines the laws of Thermodynamics with properties of matter (often gases) and the resulting probability factors to determine its Thermodynamics properties and behaviour. Ludwig Boltzmann was the first to describe the relation between atoms, probability and the laws of Thermodynamics.

        Classical Thermodynamics only describes the equilibrium states of systems: it tells what the temperature when gas A and B are mixed or the amount of work done by an expanding gas. It does not tell how long it takes before gas A and B are mixed or how quickly the work is done. For many systems, knowing the equilibrium state is not enough: e.g. we know water will run from the mountains to the ocean. But only when we know at what rate it flows down (and how much water falls on the mountain), can we tell how much water there will be in the river. Rather than its equilibrium state (= water in the ocean), we want to know the rate at which the system moves towards this state.

        To calculate such rates, a special kind of thermodynamics, called non-equilibrium thermodynamics, was developed. Lars Onsager and Ilya Prigogine are considered the two main contributors to this type of Thermodynamics. This has found applications in a broad range of disciplines, from variations in populations in biology studies to recurring variations in supply and demand in economical systems. For their work they received the Nobel Prize in 1969 (Onsager) and 1977 (Prigogine).

      • Alleigh Giddings of Missouri

        Shut up, smaty pants!

    • Alleigh Giddings of Missouri

      Hiding behind blogs! Your the one who didn’t even give her real name!

  • Ken

    Your an idiot.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Bottom